EPTReffallen in particular because he has been misleading and outright lied in his statements about possible roles/actions and because i think that other lynches have less of a chance of hitting angels
Purgatory Mafia - Page 109
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
Reffallen in particular because he has been misleading and outright lied in his statements about possible roles/actions and because i think that other lynches have less of a chance of hitting angels | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
(Am I invisible this game?) | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
I kinda hate that Grack hasn't voted. Anyone know when he is around? | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On January 17 2012 23:19 Dirkzor wrote: Wrong. After RoL claimed VT he could later have claimed channeler without it looking suspicious. As he had already claimed VT he could wait for everyone else to claim. The channeler would be missing and he could then claim channeler and most would believe him because no one else claimed channeler. If someone else claimed channeler before him he could counter-claim and town would lynch RoL (and get channeler), but after that we would lycnh the person who claimed channeler as he was lying. I'm agreeing more and more with Layabout. It appears as Refallen and HoD are buddy-ing up. They are getting their story straight as they say. Now the big question is: Which one is the AoD? HoD would be the obvious choice. Unless AoD hit Syllo first night which I don't think is unlikely. I want to lynch Refallen or HoD as of now. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
I'll leave my vote on Refallen. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
Bluelightz -> will not be back in time for the lynch if his past posting history is correct Jackal -> normally would be back with like an hour to spare, but today is a Tuesday. We might lose him to bowling. Refallen -> maybe 50/50 on being back in time? Probably not back with more than an hour to spare though Tyrran -> decent chance of being back in time, although far from guaranteed. Grackaroni -> should be back in time Layabout -> here now Dirkzor -> here now Zephirdd -> here now HarbingerOfDoom -> here now Blazinghand -> here now, can't vote I don't like our odds based on available votes alone T_T | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 18 2012 05:48 Dirkzor wrote: BH, since they moved your vote... doesnt that mean that the demons answered you "Move my vote"-code (rimes!) shinanigans? um, no... they moved my vote before i suggested the code. otherwise, I wouldn't have had to make a complicated code regarding "how to indicate you want to lynch layabout", instead i'd just use my control of my vote to ##unvote and make things simpler. I am currently not in control of my vote. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 18 2012 06:00 Zephirdd wrote: They moved the vote to Refallen and back to layabout. From his codes, that means nothing. Actually I was the one who made that move-- I voted refallen, then voted layabout. Then, the demons made me unvote, then revote refallen. Then, I suggested the voting code. since then, my vote has not moved. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 18 2012 06:02 Blazinghand wrote: Actually I was the one who made that move-- I voted refallen, then voted layabout. Then, the demons made me unvote, then revote refallen. Then, I suggested the voting code. since then, my vote has not moved. EBWOP: Actually I was the one who made that move-- I voted refallen, then voted layabout. Then, the demons made me unvote, then revote LAYABOUT. Then, I suggested the voting code. since then, my vote has not moved | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
I have a bad feeling about this :-/ | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On January 18 2012 06:04 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Voting Refallen for now :-/ I have a bad feeling about this :-/ if you don'[t think he's an aangel, don't vote for him. if you do, vote for him. don't pussyfoot around the issue. | ||
|
Dirkzor
Denmark1944 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On January 18 2012 06:07 Blazinghand wrote: if you don'[t think he's an aangel, don't vote for him. if you do, vote for him. don't pussyfoot around the issue. A no-lynch gives us a 0% chance of lynching scum. Angels we can ONLY kill via lynching. I like >0% more than 0%. | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On January 18 2012 06:10 layabout wrote: if you insist on pussyfooting, could you please use your angel wings to fly to the gallows? I don't have angel wings. | ||
| ||
