|
On December 14 2011 11:41 Radfield wrote: I think risk looks pretty town right now. I think he legitimately suspects you curu. Bad lynch in my eyes.
Oh because Rad said so. Makes sense.
Radfield, can you explain how risk looks town to you? Like, could you explain a townie motivation for the Why? post I just quoted a bit ago?
|
On December 15 2011 08:02 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:On December 15 2011 07:58 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 07:49 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 14 2011 11:02 risk.nuke wrote:No I'll be damned if you actually lynch nisani. ANYONE who votes for him I will consider to be scum. same for Zentor. Why? Because if they were mafia their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. Now I'll tell you something about bandwagons. Bandwagons are almost always influenced by mafia. due to the uncertainty of townies it's nearly impossible for a bandwagon to kick of without the mafia influencing it. Thats why in 99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing. Okay, this post. What is going on with this post? He's threatening to attack anyone who votes for the 2 present lynch candidates (or so I gather from the thread - the consensus seems to be that the lynch is either Zentor or Nisani). Why? Because if they were mafia, their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. You know, like he's doing here. He backs it up with fear tactics (Bandwagons almost always "influenced by mafia") and imaginary statistics (99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing). My read on risk.nuke gets redder and redder. Why isn't anyone considering this guy seriously? You do realise that YOU are nisani... He was saying that zentor and nisani were the top lynch candidates at that time, not that they should be now... No he was saying I am red. And his case builds around the fact that MrZentor and Nisani is scum and I'm their scumbuddy coming to protect them.
No, I'm building a case based around your scummy bullshit bro. I never said they were red (and yes, I realize I'm Nisani). What I said was you were putting a stop to their lynch with your post, though I can see how you'd think that's what I meant.
I was saying that the way you were going about stopping the lynch was scummy.
|
On December 15 2011 08:06 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 08:02 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:On December 15 2011 07:58 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 07:49 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 14 2011 11:02 risk.nuke wrote:No I'll be damned if you actually lynch nisani. ANYONE who votes for him I will consider to be scum. same for Zentor. Why? Because if they were mafia their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. Now I'll tell you something about bandwagons. Bandwagons are almost always influenced by mafia. due to the uncertainty of townies it's nearly impossible for a bandwagon to kick of without the mafia influencing it. Thats why in 99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing. Okay, this post. What is going on with this post? He's threatening to attack anyone who votes for the 2 present lynch candidates (or so I gather from the thread - the consensus seems to be that the lynch is either Zentor or Nisani). Why? Because if they were mafia, their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. You know, like he's doing here. He backs it up with fear tactics (Bandwagons almost always "influenced by mafia") and imaginary statistics (99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing). My read on risk.nuke gets redder and redder. Why isn't anyone considering this guy seriously? You do realise that YOU are nisani... He was saying that zentor and nisani were the top lynch candidates at that time, not that they should be now... No he was saying I am red. And his case builds around the fact that MrZentor and Nisani is scum and I'm their scumbuddy coming to protect them. No, I'm building a case based around your scummy bullshit bro. I never said they were red (and yes, I realize I'm Nisani). What I said was you were putting a stop to their lynch with your post, though I can see how you'd think that's what I meant. I was saying that the way you were going about stopping the lynch was scummy. So your case is I'm scummy because I'm stopping a lynch on two townies, okey now I get your logic.
|
On December 15 2011 08:02 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:On December 15 2011 07:58 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 07:49 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 14 2011 11:02 risk.nuke wrote:No I'll be damned if you actually lynch nisani. ANYONE who votes for him I will consider to be scum. same for Zentor. Why? Because if they were mafia their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. Now I'll tell you something about bandwagons. Bandwagons are almost always influenced by mafia. due to the uncertainty of townies it's nearly impossible for a bandwagon to kick of without the mafia influencing it. Thats why in 99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing. Okay, this post. What is going on with this post? He's threatening to attack anyone who votes for the 2 present lynch candidates (or so I gather from the thread - the consensus seems to be that the lynch is either Zentor or Nisani). Why? Because if they were mafia, their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. You know, like he's doing here. He backs it up with fear tactics (Bandwagons almost always "influenced by mafia") and imaginary statistics (99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing). My read on risk.nuke gets redder and redder. Why isn't anyone considering this guy seriously? You do realise that YOU are nisani... He was saying that zentor and nisani were the top lynch candidates at that time, not that they should be now... No he was saying I am red. And his case builds around the fact that MrZentor and Nisani is scum and I'm their scumbuddy coming to protect them.
Really, because I want nuke dead. He acted like acro purposely resigned from office, then tried to get it himself. MAFIA He said I shouldn't think his mafia, because he stopped people from bandwagonning me. He didn't do anything, people still bandwagonned me. He wants to make it looks like he did a lot of good without actually doing any good. MAFIA
I am pretty sure we will get a scum if we lynch him in the day.
|
At VE, thanks man. Ive been reading a bunch of games to get better. SNMMII is something I cringe at when looking at it.
|
On December 14 2011 23:53 Radfield wrote: hahahahaha
so awesome.
So VE, what do you think of Arctocod?
Null. I've found myself agreeing more than disagreeing with him so far and that's refreshing. What do you think of Arctocod?
|
On December 15 2011 08:07 risk.nuke wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 08:06 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 15 2011 08:02 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:On December 15 2011 07:58 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 07:49 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 14 2011 11:02 risk.nuke wrote:No I'll be damned if you actually lynch nisani. ANYONE who votes for him I will consider to be scum. same for Zentor. Why? Because if they were mafia their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. Now I'll tell you something about bandwagons. Bandwagons are almost always influenced by mafia. due to the uncertainty of townies it's nearly impossible for a bandwagon to kick of without the mafia influencing it. Thats why in 99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing. Okay, this post. What is going on with this post? He's threatening to attack anyone who votes for the 2 present lynch candidates (or so I gather from the thread - the consensus seems to be that the lynch is either Zentor or Nisani). Why? Because if they were mafia, their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. You know, like he's doing here. He backs it up with fear tactics (Bandwagons almost always "influenced by mafia") and imaginary statistics (99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing). My read on risk.nuke gets redder and redder. Why isn't anyone considering this guy seriously? You do realise that YOU are nisani... He was saying that zentor and nisani were the top lynch candidates at that time, not that they should be now... No he was saying I am red. And his case builds around the fact that MrZentor and Nisani is scum and I'm their scumbuddy coming to protect them. No, I'm building a case based around your scummy bullshit bro. I never said they were red (and yes, I realize I'm Nisani). What I said was you were putting a stop to their lynch with your post, though I can see how you'd think that's what I meant. I was saying that the way you were going about stopping the lynch was scummy. So your case is I'm scummy because I'm stopping a lynch on two townies, okey now I get your logic.
LOL
No. That's not my point...although I have to ask, what makes you so certain that Zentor and I are townies? Seriously, inquiring minds want to know. That's information that only we and scum have, so explain how you've come across it with such certainty that you try and use it as a defense of my argument?
|
On December 15 2011 08:25 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 08:07 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 08:06 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 15 2011 08:02 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 08:00 GreYMisT wrote:On December 15 2011 07:58 risk.nuke wrote:On December 15 2011 07:49 VisceraEyes wrote:On December 14 2011 11:02 risk.nuke wrote:No I'll be damned if you actually lynch nisani. ANYONE who votes for him I will consider to be scum. same for Zentor. Why? Because if they were mafia their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. Now I'll tell you something about bandwagons. Bandwagons are almost always influenced by mafia. due to the uncertainty of townies it's nearly impossible for a bandwagon to kick of without the mafia influencing it. Thats why in 99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing. Okay, this post. What is going on with this post? He's threatening to attack anyone who votes for the 2 present lynch candidates (or so I gather from the thread - the consensus seems to be that the lynch is either Zentor or Nisani). Why? Because if they were mafia, their buddies would had putten a stop to this ages ago. You know, like he's doing here. He backs it up with fear tactics (Bandwagons almost always "influenced by mafia") and imaginary statistics (99% bandwagon cases you're either lynching a townie or scum is bussing). My read on risk.nuke gets redder and redder. Why isn't anyone considering this guy seriously? You do realise that YOU are nisani... He was saying that zentor and nisani were the top lynch candidates at that time, not that they should be now... No he was saying I am red. And his case builds around the fact that MrZentor and Nisani is scum and I'm their scumbuddy coming to protect them. No, I'm building a case based around your scummy bullshit bro. I never said they were red (and yes, I realize I'm Nisani). What I said was you were putting a stop to their lynch with your post, though I can see how you'd think that's what I meant. I was saying that the way you were going about stopping the lynch was scummy. So your case is I'm scummy because I'm stopping a lynch on two townies, okey now I get your logic. LOLNo. That's not my point...although I have to ask, what makes you so certain that Zentor and I are townies? Seriously, inquiring minds want to know. That's information that only we and scum have, so explain how you've come across it with such certainty that you try and use it as a defense of my argument? I'm not sure on you beeing townies, but since you're the ones accusing me I think you should have have arguments that doesn't involve you beeing mafia.
|
|
On December 15 2011 08:30 VisceraEyes wrote: /facepalm No you're the bloody facepalm, the fucking shit I have to put up with from you and fucking zentor. I'm getting an idea to why palmar wanted you shot.
|
Risk, you're kind of sidestepping my points...
|
Also, just because Zentor brought it up: I was the first one to place serious concerns on Risk with evidence.
On December 14 2011 03:31 GiygaS wrote: So first of all I'm confused on how a lynch on graymist would reveal info on me :/ You didn't really explain that at all risk.
So the evidence against me is that I'm only speaking fluff and because I FoSed Dropbear...
First of all @Dropbear, I FoSed you because of other people's evidence as well which I did put in that little compilation, I was just mentionning that one of our leading scumhunters had already mentionned you early in the thread, you know adding some info that may have been forgotten. Just because you've now voted for me doesn't mean I'm dropping my FoS on you BTW.
Next people(or Dropbear, as other people are saying some of my posts are sort of useful), are saying my posts are fluff. I disagree. My post was meant as a clarification on the things about Pardoner and Mayor so that we could move on. If you look in to the context and don't just filter, a lot of people were also worried about similar things at the same time (including you risk) and actually a lot of the info that I posted there was brought up as new info later on (wait mayor cant echnically vote 3 times!!!!) My talk about LaL was answering a question, where I was elaborating on my own thoughts (yeah you can lie if you're blue, but don't make petty lies like the one I had an example of). My talks about Pardoner aws actually something I wanted done, and people opposed to it, so now I've dropped it. Risk, you even brought up an idea for exceptions too. Which you then had a complete role reversal on as soon as people seem opposed to my ideas on a more specific idea (care to explain that one?) You then later stated that forbidding pardoning is stupid and should be used at that player's discretion (which is better than a current majority how?) Anyway, I'm getting off-topic:
Yo, I'm innocent.
|
On December 15 2011 08:37 GiygaS wrote: Risk, you're kind of sidestepping my points...
Yes, could you respond to GiygaS points against you? I mean, you act like I've put you through the ringer, and I only JUST finished reading the thread - I haven't yet begun to tunnel you. Your repeated logical fallacies and appeals are only confirming my read on you. You're fucking caught bro, and I think town will agree with me by dusk tomorrow. Just sayin.
|
Gigyas you said I contradicted myself by dissagreeing with something you said. You wrote what I said but what did you say I can't find it.
|
risk.nuke could you please calm down in your posts a bit? It feels like your angry because nobody understands your logic and you get attacked on it. So would you calm down and post your reasoning behind your posts, instead of just raging? Because what we don't need right now is a slugfest of shouting names and so forth. We need to make constructive posts, to keep a townie atmosphere.
|
On December 15 2011 08:49 risk.nuke wrote: Gigyas you said I contradicted myself by dissagreeing with something you said. You wrote what I said but what did you say I can't find it.
+ Show Spoiler +On December 13 2011 05:00 GiygaS wrote:I have already stated that I would want an exception to the no pardon rule (before anyone else actually, I stated that the pardoner rule should only be used in aforementioned exceptions). I'm just thinking of a hypothetical situations that we suddenly get a really strong scum-read on somebody, and the majority of people in the thread want to lynch this new guy, but there are a lot of inactives who can't switch their vote because they are afk. Basically, we want to regulate these kind of exceptions so that we don't have no direction when these sitautions arise. This is what I want: When the Pardoner should Pardon: In a period of time of 30 minutes to 3 hours before the lynch, a pardoner can commence an unofficial voting session . All those active int he thread at this time will HAVE to vote either Yes or No to pardon the person in quesiton. This keeps the pardoner power in the hands of the town, and keeps things by and large under control. If anyone has any doubts ont his subject, bring them up, and we may want to change some of the restrictions on this. If there's a stituation that this rule did not think of, I would really feel bad data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" On the subject of rules for elected officials: I believe mayoral candidates should declare who their hidden vote is for. The benefits simply outweigh the negatives. Sure, the mafia gets a better idea of the voting situation, but it gives the mayor far more transparency, and gives us ability to monitor and regulate these powerful roles. On the subject of campaigns, I'm going to be voting for Radfield/Arctocod.and more specifically Arctocod. I feel he's being more transparent than Radfield, and has been raising some good points with good logic. I feel like Radfield has kind of said canned start of game sort of stuff so far, so i don't have any reason to think he's mafia, but I'm not convinced he's totally town either. Again, I'm leaning more int eh way that he's town because he brought up another very good palyer so quickly, who I would believe would be a threat to him if he was a mafia. On to the subject of who I want to vote: I'll be be putting my tentative lynch vote on Zeks. This will turn in to a real vote if I come back in 3 hours and no new info has really been unveilied/no info that's an easy analysis for a lynch. The points against him have been pointed out by Deus-Ex, he wanted to vote a hydra off for really no reason, other than what I can see that he's threatened by them (a mafia would be threatened!) He also dissappeared for a while, and when he returned, he just quickly answered a quesiton, and didn't either reference or defend his accusations.
There ya go.
|
I'm angry and I got every right to be. Look at Zentor, read his last two pages of post, maybe I've missed one but there isn't one that isn't either defending him or attacking me. Very usefull guy. And Vicera, for everything I say he says I'm more scum and I still don't even know what his point is.
On December 15 2011 08:54 GiygaS wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 08:49 risk.nuke wrote: Gigyas you said I contradicted myself by dissagreeing with something you said. You wrote what I said but what did you say I can't find it. + Show Spoiler +On December 13 2011 05:00 GiygaS wrote:I have already stated that I would want an exception to the no pardon rule (before anyone else actually, I stated that the pardoner rule should only be used in aforementioned exceptions). I'm just thinking of a hypothetical situations that we suddenly get a really strong scum-read on somebody, and the majority of people in the thread want to lynch this new guy, but there are a lot of inactives who can't switch their vote because they are afk. Basically, we want to regulate these kind of exceptions so that we don't have no direction when these sitautions arise. This is what I want: When the Pardoner should Pardon: In a period of time of 30 minutes to 3 hours before the lynch, a pardoner can commence an unofficial voting session . All those active int he thread at this time will HAVE to vote either Yes or No to pardon the person in quesiton. This keeps the pardoner power in the hands of the town, and keeps things by and large under control. If anyone has any doubts ont his subject, bring them up, and we may want to change some of the restrictions on this. If there's a stituation that this rule did not think of, I would really feel bad data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" On the subject of rules for elected officials: I believe mayoral candidates should declare who their hidden vote is for. The benefits simply outweigh the negatives. Sure, the mafia gets a better idea of the voting situation, but it gives the mayor far more transparency, and gives us ability to monitor and regulate these powerful roles. On the subject of campaigns, I'm going to be voting for Radfield/Arctocod.and more specifically Arctocod. I feel he's being more transparent than Radfield, and has been raising some good points with good logic. I feel like Radfield has kind of said canned start of game sort of stuff so far, so i don't have any reason to think he's mafia, but I'm not convinced he's totally town either. Again, I'm leaning more int eh way that he's town because he brought up another very good palyer so quickly, who I would believe would be a threat to him if he was a mafia. On to the subject of who I want to vote: I'll be be putting my tentative lynch vote on Zeks. This will turn in to a real vote if I come back in 3 hours and no new info has really been unveilied/no info that's an easy analysis for a lynch. The points against him have been pointed out by Deus-Ex, he wanted to vote a hydra off for really no reason, other than what I can see that he's threatened by them (a mafia would be threatened!) He also dissappeared for a while, and when he returned, he just quickly answered a quesiton, and didn't either reference or defend his accusations. There ya go. What I ment were reasons for the pardoner to SINGLEHANDEDLY decide if he wanted to pardon if something suspicious happens. But he should be aware that an (judged by the town) inadequate reason will get him lynched. You're saying that it should be decided by majority by those present. I know think a setup like that will likely favor the mafia.
|
sup
On December 15 2011 00:31 prplhz wrote:I think it is weird that Nisani201 wasn't lynched last night, when MrZentor was shot down he should have been a very easy guy to switch to but his wagon never picked up speed and instead a ton of people jumped on Spaaackle. Show nested quote +On December 13 2011 21:45 Eiii wrote: I'm going to bed now and will gladly discuss this more in the morning, but giygas feels a lot more to me like inexperienced townie than actual scum. I mean, his immediate latching on to LAL, his idea on how pardoner should work that almost seems sane at first glance... I agree that he's not significantly contributing, but given that he's only played one game other than this one and has clearly demonstrated that he's willing to post and speak his mind, I think he would be a poor lynch for today. You mention 201 though-- I *do* expect more out of him than what he's put out, since he's been around for a while. Show nested quote +On December 14 2011 11:32 Eiii wrote: oh man I address sheth just as he addresses me
I think removing Eiii is an awful idea! And I don't think 201 is scummy because he straight-up hasn't done anything scummy. He hasn't contributed, sure, and he's lurked a lot-- but if he hasn't developed significantly as a player since I last played with him, that is exactly what I would expect him to do as town. We have better targets to lynch today than a lurking townie. Why the blatant contradiction? Nisani201 didn't do ANYTHING in between these two posts.
Yep! I changed my mind, and him doing nothing was exactly what made me flip on him. I played with him in his first game a while back, and he played more or less exactly as he did now-- inactive, and pretty useless. I had expected him to develop as a player in that time... but once his name got brought up and I started actually paying more attention to his posts (or lack thereof) it became pretty clear that he was playing exactly the same as when I first played with him. I still think him/visc are town, and Visc instead of him is a pretty big win in my book.
On December 15 2011 01:39 Arctocod wrote:
Hello Eiii
prplhz pointed out your radical change of mind.
you should be receiving your gift soon enough. Please accept it, or the consequences for you will be... mortal.
On December 15 2011 02:29 GiygaS wrote: Eii, I sent you a package with the same contents as Arc's, we want to know your opinion on this info.
I've only received one package! Anyway, this is probably the meanest mechanic in any game I've played because there's like an 80% chance that this'll blow up and kill me and a 0% chance that I'll be able to resist opening the box either way. If I die, I'm going to be making a very angry face at you two. HERE WE GO
|
But what I was saying is you proposed this system in the first place, I was just adding some specifics, and then you immediately pulled a 180 with 0 explanation on the subject.
|
I didn't really propose a system at all-- when people were first bringing up 201's name I threw in that I expect him to be playing better than he was, and implied that I would be keeping an eye on him. Once he was brought to my attention like that, I realized that his play wasn't any different than what I had seen from him before-- the more reasonable explanation is that he was playing lurking town like usual instead of that he had gotten way better since I had last played with him and was just lurking because he was scum but if he was town he'd be super active. When the bandwagon started on him, it was pretty obvious that it was an easy lynch-the-lurker bandwagon that wouldn't have netted us anything but a dead town, albeit a pretty useless one (at the time!).
|
|
|
|