On November 29 2011 08:26 Ace wrote:
BC you just did something so fishy.
BC you just did something so fishy.
Pray tell enlighten me, I get called out on a fairly frequent basis.
| Forum Index > TL Mafia | 
| 
							BloodyC0bbler
							
							
						 
						Canada7876 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:26 Ace wrote: BC you just did something so fishy. Pray tell enlighten me, I get called out on a fairly frequent basis. | ||
| 
							annul
							
							
						 
						United States2841 Posts
						 if you care to read night 1, or hell, anything ive said day 2, you will see that i argue consistently and firmly that killing palmar -- AS LONG AS HE KEEPS UP DOUBLE LYNCH -- is fucking stupid. sure i think hes red. but hes self-sabotaging his team if so if hes using double lynches and helping town. so let him keep doing that. and if he is NOT red by some chance, why risk having the sheriff be red and sit on the double lynch? zeks is 100% reliable a clue. if it isnt, lynch me tomorrow. IF WE KILL ZEKS AND HE DOES NOT FLIP RED, LYNCH ME TOMORROW. i will shut the fuck up and not bother fighting it. i am that certain in the ability to use clues to get correct lynches. i have confidence that somewhere down the line someone will stand up to a red mayoral palmar if im not around to do so myself. he cant get rid of everybody with common sense. also, lurker banes need to shut the fuck up and not say shit today. or tomorrow. or at any point in time until they use their ability. and as for "Is strongly pushing modkill on ace?" yes, i am. he fucking cheated. i quit mafia last year because of cheating, just to be exposed to even worse shit on my first game back. i dont care WHAT color any of us happen to be, there is no place for this garbage in mafia. so yes. | ||
| 
							Kenpachi
							
							
						 
						United States9908 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							annul
							
							
						 
						United States2841 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							supersoft
							
							
						 
						Germany3729 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:29 annul wrote: the only other clue game i ever played was haunted mafia, a three team game, two mafia teams + town (each mafia team had to outlast the other team to win). i successfully used clues -- and ONLY clues -- to root out the members of the opposing mafia team (i was on one of the red teams). consistently. and i took MVP in that game. if you care to read night 1, or hell, anything ive said day 2, you will see that i argue consistently and firmly that killing palmar -- AS LONG AS HE KEEPS UP DOUBLE LYNCH -- is fucking stupid. sure i think hes red. but hes self-sabotaging his team if so if hes using double lynches and helping town. so let him keep doing that. and if he is NOT red by some chance, why risk having the sheriff be red and sit on the double lynch? zeks is 100% reliable a clue. if it isnt, lynch me tomorrow. IF WE KILL ZEKS AND HE DOES NOT FLIP RED, LYNCH ME TOMORROW. i will shut the fuck up and not bother fighting it. i am that certain in the ability to use clues to get correct lynches. i have confidence that somewhere down the line someone will stand up to a red mayoral palmar if im not around to do so myself. he cant get rid of everybody with common sense. also, lurker banes need to shut the fuck up and not say shit today. or tomorrow. or at any point in time until they use their ability. and as for "Is strongly pushing modkill on ace?" yes, i am. he fucking cheated. i quit mafia last year because of cheating, just to be exposed to even worse shit on my first game back. i dont care WHAT color any of us happen to be, there is no place for this garbage in mafia. so yes. what do we get from lynching you if zeks is innocent and we misinterpreted the clues... These "do that if this happens"-posts are extremely scummy. If you're scum I may aswell vote you just now?! If you are town, why should we lynch you at all, even if you're wrong. Maybe I don't understand you properly. Do you rather mean something like: "I am pretty sure that zeks is scum, I'd even bet my game-life on that"? | ||
| 
							annul
							
							
						 
						United States2841 Posts
						 that is exactly what i am saying. | ||
| 
							Kurumi
							
							
						 
						Poland6130 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:34 annul wrote: "Do you rather mean something like: "I am pretty sure that zeks is scum, I'd even bet my game-life on that"?" that is exactly what i am saying. Where is Serejai | ||
| 
							Ace
							
							
						 
						United States16096 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Pray tell enlighten me, I get called out on a fairly frequent basis. Why did you vote for Palmar. | ||
| 
							annul
							
							
						 
						United States2841 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							supersoft
							
							
						 
						Germany3729 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:36 annul wrote: but there is no chance zeks is not red, so what happens tomorrow is irrelevant to the scenario imo Your assumption is exclusively based on the clues right? Isn't zeks a lurker? Can't we bane him? | ||
| 
							annul
							
							
						 
						United States2841 Posts
						 | ||
|   
							intrigue
							    
						Washington, D.C9934 Posts
						 | ||
|   
							intrigue
							    
						Washington, D.C9934 Posts
						 | ||
| 
							wherebugsgo
							
							
						 
						Japan10647 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:41 intrigue wrote: fuckkkkk i keep going to make my second vote and then someone else posts and i get convinced again. i have annul voted already, and the second was gonna be hier. and then i read about palmar and zeks ugh make your own opinions, don't be so easily swayed by what other people are saying. Listen to the arguments, sure, but trust yourself more than anyone else if you are actually town. | ||
| 
							supersoft
							
							
						 
						Germany3729 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:41 intrigue wrote: inb4 annul convinces me he's not mafia and i have 0 votes decided On November 29 2011 07:21 supersoft wrote: I want everyone to answer this question please: Do you think that Palmar and BC are both town? If you answer this question with "no", who do you think is scummier and why do you think that? I urge you to answer these questions in the next post you make. Plus i want to hear your reasoning behind that. You don't have to write a novel. I want to see something like: "No, I think Palmar is scummier. The main point for me is his hesitation to nominate prplhz erandorr on that scummy top10list. / his overall passive playstyle / the horrible mislynch on a townie day1 / whatever... or No, I think it's BC. The main point for me are the circumstances of his election like / his DT plan he probably knew would never work / his hesitation to call anyone scummy / whatever" I believe that this is the main questioning we have to solve. If you add a quote, that'd be awesome: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=87086 Palmars filter http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=10200 BCs filter  Hi, I want to hear everyones opinion :-) | ||
| 
							layabout
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom2600 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:22 Pigsquirrel wrote: I will be voting zeks for this lynch. First off, we have the clue: Syllo getting killed on a rarely traveled path in woods (cough cough his quote is Robert Frost's poem about a rarely traveled path in a wood cough cough), but I did a quick read through of his filter to take a look at his behavior. First, his initial candidates he supports. Show nested quote + Will keep my vote for now but right now I have 1. Prplhz 2. BloodyC0bbler 3. Sandroba All three of these have been looked at as slightly scummy. Prplhz's campaign was pretty meh, nothing special, and did not stand up to much criticism. BC and Sandroba were both accused of scumminess early on, and both were supported by Zeks. His support for these candidates is rather flaky: he is getting a "good vibe" from Prplhz, and wants to "hear more" from Sandroba. I think you get the gist of things. Note: Should zeks flip red, at least one of those three is almost certainly red. That list reeks of scumbuddyhood. His actual vote: Palmar. Palmar is a pretty easy guy to vote for if one is trying to hide in a crowd, but it's impossible to use "he voted Palmar" as evidence, as that would require us to lynch half the town. After his short-lived campaign fell apart, he fell off of the map until the clue pointed at him. I don't really have any idea how one defends against a clue, as they are less logic than interpretation, but "my profile shafts me no matter what" is a pretty bad defense imo. And to go meta. Zeks was one of my scumbuddies in PYP Mafia about a year ago. From the sounds of things, he hasn't played Mafia since then, so his scum play should be pretty similar. His PYP Mafia filter He is not particularly active, and posting a small amount of logic analysis. Seem familiar? So, for one of my Day[2] (see what I did there?) lynches, ##Vote zeks @ <anybody that is intelligent>i find myself somewhat swayed by this case but i also feel that BC's point against using day1 clues for lynching makes perfect sense. should i try to come up with analysis based on zeks post? (though i feel like i may have already made up my mind making the analysis less valuable) or should i mirror this point and straight up vote? or should i decide to not trust my read and perhaps target annul + undecided and support it with analysis tomorrow? can somebody please answer this?! + Show Spoiler + On November 29 2011 05:32 layabout wrote: i think i might attempt some behavioural analysis soon but until then i noticed that in Mattchew's profile there was a large number of seemingly random (i say this because it may in fact be meaningfully to him) words/information/gibberish, i think that this would serve to make it more difficult for clues to lead to him, but clues would only lead to him if he had commit a kill. It is my understandiing that kills by blues or reds will give clues but that clues themselves will not be the basis for a lynching simply a contributing factor and a blue he should have very little to fear from a lynching because he should be pushing a pro-town agenda and would probably play a large part in their own lynching. Therefore i can only see how making a profile deliberately difficult to connect to a clue would benefit a red surely doing this to your profile is a scummy action and should we focus on players that have done this? | ||
| 
							supersoft
							
							
						 
						Germany3729 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:46 layabout wrote: Show nested quote + On November 29 2011 08:22 Pigsquirrel wrote: I will be voting zeks for this lynch. First off, we have the clue: Syllo getting killed on a rarely traveled path in woods (cough cough his quote is Robert Frost's poem about a rarely traveled path in a wood cough cough), but I did a quick read through of his filter to take a look at his behavior. First, his initial candidates he supports. Will keep my vote for now but right now I have 1. Prplhz 2. BloodyC0bbler 3. Sandroba All three of these have been looked at as slightly scummy. Prplhz's campaign was pretty meh, nothing special, and did not stand up to much criticism. BC and Sandroba were both accused of scumminess early on, and both were supported by Zeks. His support for these candidates is rather flaky: he is getting a "good vibe" from Prplhz, and wants to "hear more" from Sandroba. I think you get the gist of things. Note: Should zeks flip red, at least one of those three is almost certainly red. That list reeks of scumbuddyhood. His actual vote: Palmar. Palmar is a pretty easy guy to vote for if one is trying to hide in a crowd, but it's impossible to use "he voted Palmar" as evidence, as that would require us to lynch half the town. After his short-lived campaign fell apart, he fell off of the map until the clue pointed at him. I don't really have any idea how one defends against a clue, as they are less logic than interpretation, but "my profile shafts me no matter what" is a pretty bad defense imo. And to go meta. Zeks was one of my scumbuddies in PYP Mafia about a year ago. From the sounds of things, he hasn't played Mafia since then, so his scum play should be pretty similar. His PYP Mafia filter He is not particularly active, and posting a small amount of logic analysis. Seem familiar? So, for one of my Day[2] (see what I did there?) lynches, ##Vote zeks @ <anybody that is intelligent>i find myself somewhat swayed by this case but i also feel that BC's point against using day1 clues for lynching makes perfect sense. should i try to come up with analysis based on zeks post? (though i feel like i may have already made up my mind making the analysis less valuable) or should i mirror this point and straight up vote? or should i decide to not trust my read and perhaps target annul + undecided and support it with analysis tomorrow? can somebody please answer this?! + Show Spoiler + On November 29 2011 05:32 layabout wrote: i think i might attempt some behavioural analysis soon but until then i noticed that in Mattchew's profile there was a large number of seemingly random (i say this because it may in fact be meaningfully to him) words/information/gibberish, i think that this would serve to make it more difficult for clues to lead to him, but clues would only lead to him if he had commit a kill. It is my understandiing that kills by blues or reds will give clues but that clues themselves will not be the basis for a lynching simply a contributing factor and a blue he should have very little to fear from a lynching because he should be pushing a pro-town agenda and would probably play a large part in their own lynching. Therefore i can only see how making a profile deliberately difficult to connect to a clue would benefit a red surely doing this to your profile is a scummy action and should we focus on players that have done this? layabout, no because they did that pregame i believe. | ||
| 
							layabout
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom2600 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:48 supersoft wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 29 2011 08:46 layabout wrote: Show nested quote + On November 29 2011 08:22 Pigsquirrel wrote: I will be voting zeks for this lynch. First off, we have the clue: Syllo getting killed on a rarely traveled path in woods (cough cough his quote is Robert Frost's poem about a rarely traveled path in a wood cough cough), but I did a quick read through of his filter to take a look at his behavior. First, his initial candidates he supports. Will keep my vote for now but right now I have 1. Prplhz 2. BloodyC0bbler 3. Sandroba All three of these have been looked at as slightly scummy. Prplhz's campaign was pretty meh, nothing special, and did not stand up to much criticism. BC and Sandroba were both accused of scumminess early on, and both were supported by Zeks. His support for these candidates is rather flaky: he is getting a "good vibe" from Prplhz, and wants to "hear more" from Sandroba. I think you get the gist of things. Note: Should zeks flip red, at least one of those three is almost certainly red. That list reeks of scumbuddyhood. His actual vote: Palmar. Palmar is a pretty easy guy to vote for if one is trying to hide in a crowd, but it's impossible to use "he voted Palmar" as evidence, as that would require us to lynch half the town. After his short-lived campaign fell apart, he fell off of the map until the clue pointed at him. I don't really have any idea how one defends against a clue, as they are less logic than interpretation, but "my profile shafts me no matter what" is a pretty bad defense imo. And to go meta. Zeks was one of my scumbuddies in PYP Mafia about a year ago. From the sounds of things, he hasn't played Mafia since then, so his scum play should be pretty similar. His PYP Mafia filter He is not particularly active, and posting a small amount of logic analysis. Seem familiar? So, for one of my Day[2] (see what I did there?) lynches, ##Vote zeks @ <anybody that is intelligent>i find myself somewhat swayed by this case but i also feel that BC's point against using day1 clues for lynching makes perfect sense. should i try to come up with analysis based on zeks post? (though i feel like i may have already made up my mind making the analysis less valuable) or should i mirror this point and straight up vote? or should i decide to not trust my read and perhaps target annul + undecided and support it with analysis tomorrow? can somebody please answer this?! + Show Spoiler + On November 29 2011 05:32 layabout wrote: i think i might attempt some behavioural analysis soon but until then i noticed that in Mattchew's profile there was a large number of seemingly random (i say this because it may in fact be meaningfully to him) words/information/gibberish, i think that this would serve to make it more difficult for clues to lead to him, but clues would only lead to him if he had commit a kill. It is my understandiing that kills by blues or reds will give clues but that clues themselves will not be the basis for a lynching simply a contributing factor and a blue he should have very little to fear from a lynching because he should be pushing a pro-town agenda and would probably play a large part in their own lynching. Therefore i can only see how making a profile deliberately difficult to connect to a clue would benefit a red surely doing this to your profile is a scummy action and should we focus on players that have done this? layabout, no because they did that pregame i believe. bollocks!, i didn't think to read that, might as well spend another hour reading, at least i haven't answered a question that is directly addressed in the OP+ Show Spoiler + coughyouknowwhoyouarecough | ||
| 
							Steveling
							
							
						 
						Greece10806 Posts
						 ##vote xtfftc | ||
| 
							Benjef
							
							
						 
						United Kingdom6921 Posts
						 On November 29 2011 08:58 Steveling wrote: ##vote Palmer ##vote xtfftc As anti palmer as I am you logic against him isn't very strong On November 29 2011 06:28 Steveling wrote: One of my votes will go to Palmer. He has made the YM slip up and I'm not satisfied with the explaining he gave. He has made the extremely obvious comment '' Medics don't target on Ace '' He is now suddenly switching targets accusing prphlz. He realizes his time is nigh and he doesn't have enough sway against Ace so he needs an easier to frame scapegoat. My other vote will probably go to xtfftc. Most damning evidence on his profile. I have news for you mate, a police bat is also a club. He has multiple people backing him on the YM slip up and plus YM did spout a lot of crap but he was the only person to really go against Palmer. So it can be viewed as a personal attack. If you read the posts around the subject you would have been aware BC was jailing Ace protecting him so medics need not worry. As for the swapping targets, he only made one post about prphlz which is fair enough. I imagine when Ace starts confronting him again they will argue some more. | ||
| 
 | ||
|   StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g4858 tarik_tv1787 qojqva1649 Grubby1292 FrodaN1214 fl0m1013 Beastyqt899 Hui .150 Liquid`VortiX138 C9.Mang0131 Fuzer  100 ToD94 Skadoodle62 Trikslyr44 ZombieGrub29 Organizations 
StarCraft 2 • kabyraGe StarCraft: Brood War  156 • HeavenSC  30 • Adnapsc2  21 • Kozan • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel  • intothetv  • IndyKCrew  League of Legends Other Games | 
| The PiG Daily herO vs Clem Solar vs Clem Zoun vs Spirit Clem vs MaxPax Replay Cast Epic.LAN BSL Team A[vengers] Dewalt vs Shine UltrA vs ZeLoT LAN Event BSL 21 BSL Team A[vengers] Cross vs Motive Sziky vs HiyA LAN Event BSL 21 Replay Cast [ Show More ] Wardi Open Monday Night Weeklies Replay Cast Sparkling Tuna Cup Replay Cast The PondCast | 
|  |