• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:35
CEST 15:35
KST 22:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-66SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-63PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)11Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE15
StarCraft 2
General
August World Ranking: Clem climbs to #2 Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week Life's Huge Gambling Spree After IEM Katowice 2014
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event INu's Battles #19 2-Days Event SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game BW General Discussion ASL22 General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool
Tourneys
2v2v2v2 Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6 Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
valeq
valeq
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4514 users

TL Mafia XLVII - Page 140

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 138 139 140 141 142 266 Next
BloodyC0bbler
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Canada7876 Posts
November 28 2011 23:28 GMT
#2781
On November 29 2011 08:26 Ace wrote:
BC you just did something so fishy.


Pray tell enlighten me, I get called out on a fairly frequent basis.
#3 Member of the Chill Fanclub / Rhaegar fought nobly. Rhaegar fought valiantly. Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaeger died. --Ser Jorah Mormont TL MAFIA FORUM http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 go go !
annul
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2841 Posts
November 28 2011 23:29 GMT
#2782
the only other clue game i ever played was haunted mafia, a three team game, two mafia teams + town (each mafia team had to outlast the other team to win). i successfully used clues -- and ONLY clues -- to root out the members of the opposing mafia team (i was on one of the red teams). consistently. and i took MVP in that game.

if you care to read night 1, or hell, anything ive said day 2, you will see that i argue consistently and firmly that killing palmar -- AS LONG AS HE KEEPS UP DOUBLE LYNCH -- is fucking stupid. sure i think hes red. but hes self-sabotaging his team if so if hes using double lynches and helping town. so let him keep doing that. and if he is NOT red by some chance, why risk having the sheriff be red and sit on the double lynch?

zeks is 100% reliable a clue. if it isnt, lynch me tomorrow.

IF WE KILL ZEKS AND HE DOES NOT FLIP RED, LYNCH ME TOMORROW. i will shut the fuck up and not bother fighting it. i am that certain in the ability to use clues to get correct lynches.

i have confidence that somewhere down the line someone will stand up to a red mayoral palmar if im not around to do so myself. he cant get rid of everybody with common sense.

also, lurker banes need to shut the fuck up and not say shit today. or tomorrow. or at any point in time until they use their ability.

and as for "Is strongly pushing modkill on ace?"

yes, i am. he fucking cheated. i quit mafia last year because of cheating, just to be exposed to even worse shit on my first game back. i dont care WHAT color any of us happen to be, there is no place for this garbage in mafia. so yes.
Kenpachi
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States9908 Posts
November 28 2011 23:30 GMT
#2783
^what a boss
Nada's body is South Korea's greatest weapon.
annul
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2841 Posts
November 28 2011 23:32 GMT
#2784
i do find it interesting though that you want palmar dead. maybe its because he IS town and you arent. that would be very interesting and somewhat fitting for your argument.
supersoft
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany3729 Posts
November 28 2011 23:33 GMT
#2785
On November 29 2011 08:29 annul wrote:
the only other clue game i ever played was haunted mafia, a three team game, two mafia teams + town (each mafia team had to outlast the other team to win). i successfully used clues -- and ONLY clues -- to root out the members of the opposing mafia team (i was on one of the red teams). consistently. and i took MVP in that game.

if you care to read night 1, or hell, anything ive said day 2, you will see that i argue consistently and firmly that killing palmar -- AS LONG AS HE KEEPS UP DOUBLE LYNCH -- is fucking stupid. sure i think hes red. but hes self-sabotaging his team if so if hes using double lynches and helping town. so let him keep doing that. and if he is NOT red by some chance, why risk having the sheriff be red and sit on the double lynch?

zeks is 100% reliable a clue. if it isnt, lynch me tomorrow.

IF WE KILL ZEKS AND HE DOES NOT FLIP RED, LYNCH ME TOMORROW. i will shut the fuck up and not bother fighting it. i am that certain in the ability to use clues to get correct lynches.

i have confidence that somewhere down the line someone will stand up to a red mayoral palmar if im not around to do so myself. he cant get rid of everybody with common sense.

also, lurker banes need to shut the fuck up and not say shit today. or tomorrow. or at any point in time until they use their ability.

and as for "Is strongly pushing modkill on ace?"

yes, i am. he fucking cheated. i quit mafia last year because of cheating, just to be exposed to even worse shit on my first game back. i dont care WHAT color any of us happen to be, there is no place for this garbage in mafia. so yes.


what do we get from lynching you if zeks is innocent and we misinterpreted the clues... These "do that if this happens"-posts are extremely scummy. If you're scum I may aswell vote you just now?! If you are town, why should we lynch you at all, even if you're wrong.
Maybe I don't understand you properly. Do you rather mean something like: "I am pretty sure that zeks is scum, I'd even bet my game-life on that"?
annul
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2841 Posts
November 28 2011 23:34 GMT
#2786
"Do you rather mean something like: "I am pretty sure that zeks is scum, I'd even bet my game-life on that"?"

that is exactly what i am saying.
Kurumi
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Poland6130 Posts
November 28 2011 23:35 GMT
#2787
On November 29 2011 08:34 annul wrote:
"Do you rather mean something like: "I am pretty sure that zeks is scum, I'd even bet my game-life on that"?"

that is exactly what i am saying.

Where is Serejai
I work alone. // Visit TL Mafia subforum!
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
November 28 2011 23:35 GMT
#2788
On November 29 2011 08:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 29 2011 08:26 Ace wrote:
BC you just did something so fishy.


Pray tell enlighten me, I get called out on a fairly frequent basis.


Why did you vote for Palmar.
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
annul
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2841 Posts
November 28 2011 23:36 GMT
#2789
but there is no chance zeks is not red, so what happens tomorrow is irrelevant to the scenario imo
supersoft
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany3729 Posts
November 28 2011 23:38 GMT
#2790
On November 29 2011 08:36 annul wrote:
but there is no chance zeks is not red, so what happens tomorrow is irrelevant to the scenario imo


Your assumption is exclusively based on the clues right?
Isn't zeks a lurker? Can't we bane him?
annul
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2841 Posts
November 28 2011 23:39 GMT
#2791
i do not know what the standard of proof is for lurkership or if zeks would meet it
intrigue
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Washington, D.C9935 Posts
November 28 2011 23:41 GMT
#2792
fuckkkkk i keep going to make my second vote and then someone else posts and i get convinced again. i have annul voted already, and the second was gonna be hier. and then i read about palmar and zeks ugh
Moderatorsloppy little slug
intrigue
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Washington, D.C9935 Posts
November 28 2011 23:41 GMT
#2793
inb4 annul convinces me he's not mafia and i have 0 votes decided
Moderatorsloppy little slug
wherebugsgo
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Japan10647 Posts
November 28 2011 23:44 GMT
#2794
On November 29 2011 08:41 intrigue wrote:
fuckkkkk i keep going to make my second vote and then someone else posts and i get convinced again. i have annul voted already, and the second was gonna be hier. and then i read about palmar and zeks ugh


make your own opinions, don't be so easily swayed by what other people are saying.

Listen to the arguments, sure, but trust yourself more than anyone else if you are actually town.
supersoft
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany3729 Posts
November 28 2011 23:44 GMT
#2795
On November 29 2011 08:41 intrigue wrote:
inb4 annul convinces me he's not mafia and i have 0 votes decided


On November 29 2011 07:21 supersoft wrote:
I want everyone to answer this question please:

Do you think that Palmar and BC are both town?

If you answer this question with "no", who do you think is scummier and why do you think that?


I urge you to answer these questions in the next post you make. Plus i want to hear your reasoning behind that. You don't have to write a novel. I want to see something like:

"No, I think Palmar is scummier. The main point for me is his hesitation to nominate prplhz erandorr on that scummy top10list. / his overall passive playstyle / the horrible mislynch on a townie day1 / whatever...

or

No, I think it's BC. The main point for me are the circumstances of his election like / his DT plan he probably knew would never work / his hesitation to call anyone scummy / whatever"

I believe that this is the main questioning we have to solve.

If you add a quote, that'd be awesome:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=87086 Palmars filter
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=285690&user=10200 BCs filter



Hi, I want to hear everyones opinion :-)
layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
November 28 2011 23:46 GMT
#2796
On November 29 2011 08:22 Pigsquirrel wrote:
I will be voting zeks for this lynch. First off, we have the clue: Syllo getting killed on a rarely traveled path in woods (cough cough his quote is Robert Frost's poem about a rarely traveled path in a wood cough cough), but I did a quick read through of his filter to take a look at his behavior.
First, his initial candidates he supports.
Show nested quote +

Will keep my vote for now but right now I have
1. Prplhz
2. BloodyC0bbler
3. Sandroba

All three of these have been looked at as slightly scummy. Prplhz's campaign was pretty meh, nothing special, and did not stand up to much criticism. BC and Sandroba were both accused of scumminess early on, and both were supported by Zeks. His support for these candidates is rather flaky: he is getting a "good vibe" from Prplhz, and wants to "hear more" from Sandroba. I think you get the gist of things. Note: Should zeks flip red, at least one of those three is almost certainly red. That list reeks of scumbuddyhood.

His actual vote: Palmar. Palmar is a pretty easy guy to vote for if one is trying to hide in a crowd, but it's impossible to use "he voted Palmar" as evidence, as that would require us to lynch half the town.

After his short-lived campaign fell apart, he fell off of the map until the clue pointed at him. I don't really have any idea how one defends against a clue, as they are less logic than interpretation, but "my profile shafts me no matter what" is a pretty bad defense imo.

And to go meta. Zeks was one of my scumbuddies in PYP Mafia about a year ago. From the sounds of things, he hasn't played Mafia since then, so his scum play should be pretty similar.

His PYP Mafia filter
He is not particularly active, and posting a small amount of logic analysis. Seem familiar?

So, for one of my Day[2] (see what I did there?) lynches, ##Vote zeks


@ <anybody that is intelligent>i find myself somewhat swayed by this case but i also feel that BC's point against using day1 clues for lynching makes perfect sense. should i try to come up with analysis based on zeks post? (though i feel like i may have already made up my mind making the analysis less valuable) or should i mirror this point and straight up vote?
or should i decide to not trust my read and perhaps target annul + undecided and support it with analysis tomorrow?

can somebody please answer this?!
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 29 2011 05:32 layabout wrote:
i think i might attempt some behavioural analysis soon but until then i noticed that in Mattchew's profile there was a large number of seemingly random (i say this because it may in fact be meaningfully to him) words/information/gibberish, i think that this would serve to make it more difficult for clues to lead to him, but clues would only lead to him if he had commit a kill. It is my understandiing that kills by blues or reds will give clues but that clues themselves will not be the basis for a lynching simply a contributing factor and a blue he should have very little to fear from a lynching because he should be pushing a pro-town agenda and would probably play a large part in their own lynching.

Therefore i can only see how making a profile deliberately difficult to connect to a clue would benefit a red
surely doing this to your profile is a scummy action and should we focus on players that have done this?

Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
supersoft
Profile Joined April 2010
Germany3729 Posts
November 28 2011 23:48 GMT
#2797
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 29 2011 08:46 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 29 2011 08:22 Pigsquirrel wrote:
I will be voting zeks for this lynch. First off, we have the clue: Syllo getting killed on a rarely traveled path in woods (cough cough his quote is Robert Frost's poem about a rarely traveled path in a wood cough cough), but I did a quick read through of his filter to take a look at his behavior.
First, his initial candidates he supports.

Will keep my vote for now but right now I have
1. Prplhz
2. BloodyC0bbler
3. Sandroba

All three of these have been looked at as slightly scummy. Prplhz's campaign was pretty meh, nothing special, and did not stand up to much criticism. BC and Sandroba were both accused of scumminess early on, and both were supported by Zeks. His support for these candidates is rather flaky: he is getting a "good vibe" from Prplhz, and wants to "hear more" from Sandroba. I think you get the gist of things. Note: Should zeks flip red, at least one of those three is almost certainly red. That list reeks of scumbuddyhood.

His actual vote: Palmar. Palmar is a pretty easy guy to vote for if one is trying to hide in a crowd, but it's impossible to use "he voted Palmar" as evidence, as that would require us to lynch half the town.

After his short-lived campaign fell apart, he fell off of the map until the clue pointed at him. I don't really have any idea how one defends against a clue, as they are less logic than interpretation, but "my profile shafts me no matter what" is a pretty bad defense imo.

And to go meta. Zeks was one of my scumbuddies in PYP Mafia about a year ago. From the sounds of things, he hasn't played Mafia since then, so his scum play should be pretty similar.

His PYP Mafia filter
He is not particularly active, and posting a small amount of logic analysis. Seem familiar?

So, for one of my Day[2] (see what I did there?) lynches, ##Vote zeks


@ <anybody that is intelligent>i find myself somewhat swayed by this case but i also feel that BC's point against using day1 clues for lynching makes perfect sense. should i try to come up with analysis based on zeks post? (though i feel like i may have already made up my mind making the analysis less valuable) or should i mirror this point and straight up vote?
or should i decide to not trust my read and perhaps target annul + undecided and support it with analysis tomorrow?

can somebody please answer this?!
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 29 2011 05:32 layabout wrote:
i think i might attempt some behavioural analysis soon but until then i noticed that in Mattchew's profile there was a large number of seemingly random (i say this because it may in fact be meaningfully to him) words/information/gibberish, i think that this would serve to make it more difficult for clues to lead to him, but clues would only lead to him if he had commit a kill. It is my understandiing that kills by blues or reds will give clues but that clues themselves will not be the basis for a lynching simply a contributing factor and a blue he should have very little to fear from a lynching because he should be pushing a pro-town agenda and would probably play a large part in their own lynching.

Therefore i can only see how making a profile deliberately difficult to connect to a clue would benefit a red
surely doing this to your profile is a scummy action and should we focus on players that have done this?




layabout, no because they did that pregame i believe.
layabout
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
United Kingdom2600 Posts
November 28 2011 23:53 GMT
#2798
On November 29 2011 08:48 supersoft wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 29 2011 08:46 layabout wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 29 2011 08:22 Pigsquirrel wrote:
I will be voting zeks for this lynch. First off, we have the clue: Syllo getting killed on a rarely traveled path in woods (cough cough his quote is Robert Frost's poem about a rarely traveled path in a wood cough cough), but I did a quick read through of his filter to take a look at his behavior.
First, his initial candidates he supports.

Will keep my vote for now but right now I have
1. Prplhz
2. BloodyC0bbler
3. Sandroba

All three of these have been looked at as slightly scummy. Prplhz's campaign was pretty meh, nothing special, and did not stand up to much criticism. BC and Sandroba were both accused of scumminess early on, and both were supported by Zeks. His support for these candidates is rather flaky: he is getting a "good vibe" from Prplhz, and wants to "hear more" from Sandroba. I think you get the gist of things. Note: Should zeks flip red, at least one of those three is almost certainly red. That list reeks of scumbuddyhood.

His actual vote: Palmar. Palmar is a pretty easy guy to vote for if one is trying to hide in a crowd, but it's impossible to use "he voted Palmar" as evidence, as that would require us to lynch half the town.

After his short-lived campaign fell apart, he fell off of the map until the clue pointed at him. I don't really have any idea how one defends against a clue, as they are less logic than interpretation, but "my profile shafts me no matter what" is a pretty bad defense imo.

And to go meta. Zeks was one of my scumbuddies in PYP Mafia about a year ago. From the sounds of things, he hasn't played Mafia since then, so his scum play should be pretty similar.

His PYP Mafia filter
He is not particularly active, and posting a small amount of logic analysis. Seem familiar?

So, for one of my Day[2] (see what I did there?) lynches, ##Vote zeks


@ <anybody that is intelligent>i find myself somewhat swayed by this case but i also feel that BC's point against using day1 clues for lynching makes perfect sense. should i try to come up with analysis based on zeks post? (though i feel like i may have already made up my mind making the analysis less valuable) or should i mirror this point and straight up vote?
or should i decide to not trust my read and perhaps target annul + undecided and support it with analysis tomorrow?

can somebody please answer this?!
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 29 2011 05:32 layabout wrote:
i think i might attempt some behavioural analysis soon but until then i noticed that in Mattchew's profile there was a large number of seemingly random (i say this because it may in fact be meaningfully to him) words/information/gibberish, i think that this would serve to make it more difficult for clues to lead to him, but clues would only lead to him if he had commit a kill. It is my understandiing that kills by blues or reds will give clues but that clues themselves will not be the basis for a lynching simply a contributing factor and a blue he should have very little to fear from a lynching because he should be pushing a pro-town agenda and would probably play a large part in their own lynching.

Therefore i can only see how making a profile deliberately difficult to connect to a clue would benefit a red
surely doing this to your profile is a scummy action and should we focus on players that have done this?




layabout, no because they did that pregame i believe.

bollocks!, i didn't think to read that, might as well spend another hour reading, at least i haven't answered a question that is directly addressed in the OP+ Show Spoiler +
coughyouknowwhoyouarecough
so thanks
Be the Best You Can Be ! Play MAFIA II http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/ II Dragonsound Best Band
Steveling
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Greece10806 Posts
November 28 2011 23:58 GMT
#2799
##vote Palmer
##vote xtfftc
My dick has shrunk to the point where it looks like I have 3 balls.
Benjef
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United Kingdom6921 Posts
November 29 2011 00:21 GMT
#2800
On November 29 2011 08:58 Steveling wrote:
##vote Palmer
##vote xtfftc

As anti palmer as I am you logic against him isn't very strong

On November 29 2011 06:28 Steveling wrote:
One of my votes will go to Palmer.

He has made the YM slip up and I'm not satisfied with the explaining he gave.

He has made the extremely obvious comment '' Medics don't target on Ace ''

He is now suddenly switching targets accusing prphlz. He realizes his time is nigh and he doesn't have enough sway against Ace so he needs an easier to frame scapegoat.

My other vote will probably go to xtfftc. Most damning evidence on his profile.
I have news for you mate, a police bat is also a club.


He has multiple people backing him on the YM slip up and plus YM did spout a lot of crap but he was the only person to really go against Palmer. So it can be viewed as a personal attack.

If you read the posts around the subject you would have been aware BC was jailing Ace protecting him so medics need not worry.

As for the swapping targets, he only made one post about prphlz which is fair enough. I imagine when Ace starts confronting him again they will argue some more.
<3 | Dota 2 | DayZ | <3
Prev 1 138 139 140 141 142 266 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
INu's Battles
11:00
#19 - Day 1
ByuN vs ClassicLIVE!
Clem vs NightMare
IntoTheiNu 1571
WardiTV1164
LiquipediaDiscussion
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #140
Classic vs Iba
ByuN vs TBD
CranKy Ducklings50
CranKy Ducklings SOOP9
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 46307
Calm 10355
Bisu 2748
Jaedong 1092
EffOrt 927
Horang2 630
Shuttle 562
BeSt 508
Mini 452
Leta 312
[ Show more ]
Larva 302
Stork 285
ZerO 284
Zeus 138
hero 94
Pusan 79
Hyun 76
Sharp 74
Mong 71
JYJ 52
ToSsGirL 51
Mind 50
Hm[arnc] 43
sorry 29
Terrorterran 25
soO 24
Shine 22
Barracks 21
Sexy 19
zelot 15
Noble 11
Rock 7
Dota 2
Gorgc11494
Dendi1082
syndereN291
BananaSlamJamma159
Counter-Strike
byalli539
edward495
Other Games
singsing1988
B2W.Neo924
hiko672
Lowko544
Pyrionflax186
Liquid`LucifroN168
Liquid`VortiX87
ZerO(Twitch)19
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV76
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 25
lovetv 18
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV452
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
10h 25m
Replay Cast
19h 25m
Kung Fu Cup
21h 25m
Replay Cast
1d 10h
The PondCast
1d 20h
INu's Battles
1d 21h
Percival vs Cure
Replay Cast
2 days
Escore
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
PiG Sty Festival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-03
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
RSL Revival: Season 6
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5
Escore Tournament S3: W6
Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.