Pick Your Power Interesting! - Page 39
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
My previous post? or your post? What sounds ridiculous, you're making less and less sense btw. | ||
hiro protagonist
1294 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
IMO it's Radfield. Perhaps other people disagree, but what is almost everyone's reason from going against him? He's really good at seeming townie as mafia. With this attitude, might as well kill him now [sarcasm]. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
oh and that "implying" is from my post | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:18 heist wrote: Who is the player that is contributing, staying active, logical and generally acting as a townie should? IMO it's Radfield. Perhaps other people disagree, but what is almost everyone's reason from going against him? He's really good at seeming townie as mafia. With this attitude, might as well kill him now [sarcasm]. You didn't answer my question...Which post implied that he should be killed? my previous post or one of your posts? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:18 heist wrote: left out the word best in there somewhere oh and that "implying" is from my post Can you quote the post that is implying that he should be killed? | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
if he's better at hiding his mafia alignment why would you vote for him even if he is active??? I'm not implying you want him dead. I'm saying if you follow this train of thought, you might as well just go the extreme and kill him off. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:22 heist wrote: I guess it was your post if he's better at hiding his mafia alignment why would you vote for him even if he is active??? I'm not implying you want him dead. I'm saying if you follow this train of thought, you might as well just go the extreme and kill him off. So do you go to the extreme with every single statement like that? I didn't see you ever do a logical jump like this in LOTR and there was a lot of things that happened in that game that had a train of thought that could have been followed to the extremes. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
heist
United States720 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
| ||
JimboSilvers
United Kingdom167 Posts
On October 16 2011 05:36 heist wrote: im not looking for every opportunity to "take something to the extreme" Out of curiosity, why Radfield instead of me? I've not been as active as Radfield, but I have been active. Do you just not like me because I'm a #3 pick? | ||
Node
United States2159 Posts
![]() | ||
Arctocod
Norway251 Posts
On October 16 2011 06:33 Node wrote: I'm voting Greymist for pretty much the same reason as the other guys. I'm not satisfied with the townie-ness of the other candidates, but in reading Greymist's posts and seeing him talk in IRC I'm pretty confident saying that I've got a stronger town read. He's pretty transparent -- almost too transparent. ![]() greymist is town he just has a slightly weaker reason to be the major than the other two. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
But one thing I found flawed is the mentality of voting for someone based on who they would lynch. The lynch target should the same regardless of the mayor. Obviously, the mayor has final say and veto. And obviously, I'll ask candidates who they want to lynch, which can be revealing, but the lynch should be a town decision overall. It shouldn't really be used as a platform to get elected, but rather something for town to discuss while electing the mayor on their own merits. So let's say I wasn't exactly receptive when you started off your campaign founded on a promise to lynch Sandroba. It just came off as: This is my best judgment, This is what's going to happen if I'm mayor, vote for me if you agree. The #3 thing didn't really bother me so much as that. | ||
Radfield
![]()
Canada2720 Posts
On October 16 2011 06:12 kitaman27 wrote: Mig/Radfield, would you both be capable of being around at the deadline each cycle if you were to be elected the pardoner? I don't think there is a need for that. Protect said we can conditionally pardon. | ||
kitaman27
![]()
United States9244 Posts
On October 16 2011 06:45 Radfield wrote: I don't think there is a need for that. Protect said we can conditionally pardon. As in "I'll pardon if the Showtime! or vote rigger role gets used on person x, y, or z?" | ||
Arctocod
Norway251 Posts
I already know like 10 people or something. | ||
heist
United States720 Posts
On October 16 2011 06:47 Arctocod wrote: guys, you should just claim to me. I already know like 10 people or something. then something is seriously wrong | ||
| ||