|
Kurumi stop tunneling him. He claims he has to do it to you but you don't have to do it back unless you actually think he is Mafia for more than just accusing you.
Let's not make day 1 you two just tunnel fucking each other uselessly.
|
Look at the town go round and round with their spammy arguments. I'll be out of a job at this rate my old friend. Everyone is so unhappy with things, why can't we just get along? Brown isn't a third party, it's the ONLY party. Sad...Very sad.
Very well, in an attempt to make people happy, I will read you all a letter I just intercepted. I don't know who it was for, but I found that the author is someone by the name of Uncle Screwtape Flamewheel!
Original Message From flamewheel:
Dear Walton,
I am pleased to see that your efforts to take over the town seem to be off to a swiming start. The town is caught up in their cute role-playing games, and even those who are calling them out are only role-playing themselves! Ha, this is sure to be an easy victory. First and foremost, you need to let the town do their own thing for a little while, nobody has shown up to really lead the town, and if you let them start the meham themselves, some townie will take the fall for it. So let them be, but once they start getting into the roleplaying, you MUST make sure that they continue posting only roleplay content, and nothing useful. Thankfully stage one is almost complete, and people are in shouting maches already! You will want to step in soon however, to avoid mod-kill, as that would be both a great victory for the town, and a travesty for the Mafia. I'm very interested in how this will all turn out, so don't dissapoint me.
Wishing to an early townie lynch, and swift lylo for town,
Flamewheel
A curious message indeed I must say. I wonder who this mysterious Walton could be? Whatever his identity, I'd best be on the look out for the devious strategies Flamewheel mentioned. Who knows what dangers there may lurk beneith the surface here.
|
On August 14 2011 05:02 Curu wrote:
Kurumi stop tunneling him. He claims he has to do it to you but you don't have to do it back unless you actually think he is Mafia for more than just accusing you.
Let's not make day 1 you two just tunnel fucking each other uselessly.
I am just pointing out that it makes no sense for anyone to do actions claimed to be done by Jackal. Well, I might as well go afk if You want.
|
On August 14 2011 05:03 Kavdragon wrote:Look at the town go round and round with their spammy arguments. I'll be out of a job at this rate my old friend. Everyone is so unhappy with things, why can't we just get along? Brown isn't a third party, it's the ONLY party. Sad...Very sad. Very well, in an attempt to make people happy, I will read you all a letter I just intercepted. I don't know who it was for, but I found that the author is someone by the name of Uncle Screwtape Flamewheel! Show nested quote +Original Message From flamewheel:
Dear Walton,
I am pleased to see that your efforts to take over the town seem to be off to a swiming start. The town is caught up in their cute role-playing games, and even those who are calling them out are only role-playing themselves! Ha, this is sure to be an easy victory. First and foremost, you need to let the town do their own thing for a little while, nobody has shown up to really lead the town, and if you let them start the meham themselves, some townie will take the fall for it. So let them be, but once they start getting into the roleplaying, you MUST make sure that they continue posting only roleplay content, and nothing useful. Thankfully stage one is almost complete, and people are in shouting maches already! You will want to step in soon however, to avoid mod-kill, as that would be both a great victory for the town, and a travesty for the Mafia. I'm very interested in how this will all turn out, so don't dissapoint me.
Wishing to an early townie lynch, and swift lylo for town,
Flamewheel A curious message indeed I must say. I wonder who this mysterious Walton could be? Whatever his identity, I'd best be on the look out for the devious strategies Flamewheel mentioned. Who knows what dangers there may lurk beneith the surface here.
I think You are a mole bro 
|
oh nvn You intercepted the message
|
This is very strange, I think that Flamewheel may have my identity confused with someone else, because I just received an IM from him where he was laughing about the fact that there were 15 pages already. He seemed to think that there was a delicious amount of spam, and that it was helping the mafia nicely.
Best keep that in mind. Stay out of petty arguments.
|
On August 14 2011 05:03 Kurumi wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 05:02 Curu wrote:
Kurumi stop tunneling him. He claims he has to do it to you but you don't have to do it back unless you actually think he is Mafia for more than just accusing you.
Let's not make day 1 you two just tunnel fucking each other uselessly. I am just pointing out that it makes no sense for anyone to do actions claimed to be done by Jackal. Well, I might as well go afk if You want.
His actions make some sort of sense when you take into consideration he has to see you lynched. If you think he is Mafia fine, I just don't want you two shitting up the thread if you both think each other is Town.
|
United States4714 Posts
Huh Kav, so you are basically claiming FW is mafia right? And you somehow intercepted some PM he meant to send to someone else?
|
Well until something else comes up
##Vote Flamewheel
Let's see what he has to say.
|
|
|
Here's the very strange part! I IP checked the messages, and the DIDN'T come from flamewheel's place! Very odd, I wonder if this is a imposter. Most.... perturbetory.
|
|
|
Kavdragon trolling now, too...
If it's not a post restriction, please stop.
|
On August 14 2011 05:08 Curu wrote:
Well until something else comes up
##Vote Flamewheel
Let's see what he has to say.
No no, it's Walton we need to go after! We must find Walton. I'm offering a reward for who can find Walton. The person to secure his death will receive the Brown Medallion of Awesome!
Why would you jump on someone so easily anyways? Very odd.
|
On August 14 2011 04:50 Curu wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 04:41 deconduo wrote:On August 14 2011 04:36 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:32 deconduo wrote:On August 14 2011 04:28 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:24 deconduo wrote:On August 13 2011 22:25 BarBaPoPPa wrote:On August 13 2011 19:31 deconduo wrote:
/confirm
Right, we got us here an interesting situation with the majority lynch rules. Unless we have a shortlist of targets by say 24 hours into the day, its going to be pretty fucking difficult to get anyone lynched.
there is no reason to ignore evidence that comes into play later than 24 hours into the day u know? if your gonna just vote some stupid random person, then that's fucking scummy, but it only takes like 2-3 hours to switch the votes if we find scum later in the day. Never said to ignore candidates after 24 hours, I said if we don't have a decent shortlist getting a lynch will be difficult. I also disagree that its possible to turnaround a lynch in 2-3 hours. Even with evidence that someone is 100% scum, because of different timezones its possible that you won't have enough people online. Couple this with the fact that you're never going to get absolute proof, whats more than likely to happen is people start to switch votes and we end up lynching nobody. Anyone that comes in with 'new' evidence just before the deadline and tries to swing a lynch should be vigged. They should have presented the evidence earlier or shut up. On August 14 2011 02:14 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Yeah, Bum is right. I don't think that names and alignment would be linked directly, as it would break the set-up somewhat through mass name-claims. As well, how would we decide what names are what alignment? I see it as people would be able to just twist it as they see fit, as a lot of players have had good games as town and mafia, or can fit into both alignments. For example, Ace is given as an example role for town in the OP, but a lot of people would probably try to argue that he's mafia as well. It's a very insubstantial way of scum hunting that I think we should try to avoid. Anyone pushing for someone's lynch just based on their name is probably scummy. (Or dumb) Also, deconduo had a good post about the lynch rules: On August 13 2011 19:31 deconduo wrote:
/confirm
Right, we got us here an interesting situation with the majority lynch rules. Unless we have a shortlist of targets by say 24 hours into the day, its going to be pretty fucking difficult to get anyone lynched.
People not voting for one of the top three candidates at the end of the day should considered scummy as fuck, especially if we don't reach a majority. We can't have anyone throwing away a vote cos of tunnelling/stupidity/OMGUS. Each vote is vital. I agree with his sentiment, that it will be vital to consolidate votes as the day goes on. We don't want a situation where the vote is split amongst several people each with only a few votes on them, as then we either waste our lynch, or we're forced to try to switch around votes right before the deadline, giving scum a good chance to manipulate the lynch right before it happens. I think a major factor in this, will be people needing to actually think and read, judging who's scummiest, and dropping "protestation" votes and pressure votes (that are for information) before the deadline is up. ----- Jackal is likely telling the truth. He's been pushing for kurumi to be lynched ever since he claimed BM. Its quite unlike him to fake claim a restriction like that, and seeing as no one has CC'd L I believe him. This doesn't reflect on alignments at all, and in fact I would think its more likely for L to be a mafia personality than Bill Murray. However it does us no good to have Kurumi troll, and if Jackal is forced to tunnel him then we have two people that are just posting trash. Lynching Kurumi solves this problem quite nicely. He should be one of the people on our lynch shortlist for sure. So you think it's more likely Jackal is Mafia and Kurumi is Town but you want Kurumi lynched instead? Hi there scum logic. Read the post properly before commenting kthx. People are saying that Kurumi is scum because BM is a scummy personality. I said that L is more likely to be scum if personalities reflected alignment, which I believe they do not. Please show me a single person that said Kurumi is scum because BM is a scummy personality. On August 14 2011 00:25 Jackal58 wrote:
Kurumi/Bill Murray must die. He is 3rd party or scum. There is absolutely no way we can allow a troll playing a troll remain in the game. Lynch him now!!!!! So Jackal, whose entire goal is to get Kurumi killed, says Kurumi is most likely scum because he's Bill Murray... You want them to stop arguing, but you want to lynch Kurumi (who is probably Town). Why not Jackal? He's the one that has to be pushing this only lynch Kurumi garbage. It's unlikely for a Townie to have a goal that is to get one specific Mafia lynched.
You asked for an example. I gave you an example. You then proceed to complain that I gave you an example. Scum are never happy it seems.
Lynching Jackal doesn't stop Kurumi trolling, whereas lynching Kurumi solves both problems. Jackal can then go back to playing properly and we have a mostly troll free thread instead of a shitfest.
Finally I never said that Kurumi should be the only one under discussion, I said that Kurumi would be a good lynch candidate that should be considered. If you feel Jackal should be lynched instead then go ahead and make a case.
|
Alright, deconduo is scum.
On August 14 2011 04:24 deconduo wrote:
Jackal is likely telling the truth. He's been pushing for kurumi to be lynched ever since he claimed BM. Its quite unlike him to fake claim a restriction like that, and seeing as no one has CC'd L I believe him. This doesn't reflect on alignments at all, and in fact I would think its more likely for L to be a mafia personality than Bill Murray.
However it does us no good to have Kurumi troll, and if Jackal is forced to tunnel him then we have two people that are just posting trash. Lynching Kurumi solves this problem quite nicely. He should be one of the people on our lynch shortlist for sure.
So you're saying that BM is probably a townie but we should lynch him anyway? In addition, we should help a possible third party achieve his objective? Ha!
On August 14 2011 04:41 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 04:36 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:32 deconduo wrote:On August 14 2011 04:28 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:24 deconduo wrote:On August 13 2011 22:25 BarBaPoPPa wrote:On August 13 2011 19:31 deconduo wrote:
/confirm
Right, we got us here an interesting situation with the majority lynch rules. Unless we have a shortlist of targets by say 24 hours into the day, its going to be pretty fucking difficult to get anyone lynched.
there is no reason to ignore evidence that comes into play later than 24 hours into the day u know? if your gonna just vote some stupid random person, then that's fucking scummy, but it only takes like 2-3 hours to switch the votes if we find scum later in the day. Never said to ignore candidates after 24 hours, I said if we don't have a decent shortlist getting a lynch will be difficult. I also disagree that its possible to turnaround a lynch in 2-3 hours. Even with evidence that someone is 100% scum, because of different timezones its possible that you won't have enough people online. Couple this with the fact that you're never going to get absolute proof, whats more than likely to happen is people start to switch votes and we end up lynching nobody. Anyone that comes in with 'new' evidence just before the deadline and tries to swing a lynch should be vigged. They should have presented the evidence earlier or shut up. On August 14 2011 02:14 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Yeah, Bum is right. I don't think that names and alignment would be linked directly, as it would break the set-up somewhat through mass name-claims. As well, how would we decide what names are what alignment? I see it as people would be able to just twist it as they see fit, as a lot of players have had good games as town and mafia, or can fit into both alignments. For example, Ace is given as an example role for town in the OP, but a lot of people would probably try to argue that he's mafia as well. It's a very insubstantial way of scum hunting that I think we should try to avoid. Anyone pushing for someone's lynch just based on their name is probably scummy. (Or dumb) Also, deconduo had a good post about the lynch rules: On August 13 2011 19:31 deconduo wrote:
/confirm
Right, we got us here an interesting situation with the majority lynch rules. Unless we have a shortlist of targets by say 24 hours into the day, its going to be pretty fucking difficult to get anyone lynched.
People not voting for one of the top three candidates at the end of the day should considered scummy as fuck, especially if we don't reach a majority. We can't have anyone throwing away a vote cos of tunnelling/stupidity/OMGUS. Each vote is vital. I agree with his sentiment, that it will be vital to consolidate votes as the day goes on. We don't want a situation where the vote is split amongst several people each with only a few votes on them, as then we either waste our lynch, or we're forced to try to switch around votes right before the deadline, giving scum a good chance to manipulate the lynch right before it happens. I think a major factor in this, will be people needing to actually think and read, judging who's scummiest, and dropping "protestation" votes and pressure votes (that are for information) before the deadline is up. ----- Jackal is likely telling the truth. He's been pushing for kurumi to be lynched ever since he claimed BM. Its quite unlike him to fake claim a restriction like that, and seeing as no one has CC'd L I believe him. This doesn't reflect on alignments at all, and in fact I would think its more likely for L to be a mafia personality than Bill Murray. However it does us no good to have Kurumi troll, and if Jackal is forced to tunnel him then we have two people that are just posting trash. Lynching Kurumi solves this problem quite nicely. He should be one of the people on our lynch shortlist for sure. So you think it's more likely Jackal is Mafia and Kurumi is Town but you want Kurumi lynched instead? Hi there scum logic. Read the post properly before commenting kthx. People are saying that Kurumi is scum because BM is a scummy personality. I said that L is more likely to be scum if personalities reflected alignment, which I believe they do not. Please show me a single person that said Kurumi is scum because BM is a scummy personality. Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 00:25 Jackal58 wrote:
Kurumi/Bill Murray must die. He is 3rd party or scum. There is absolutely no way we can allow a troll playing a troll remain in the game. Lynch him now!!!!!
This is not a good quote. Look at the context; Jackal's last three posts before this (1, 2, 3) are pretty obviously him pushing for a bill lynch on the basis of his role. He's not giving evidence, or reasons for lynching, he's just saying lets kill this person. Jackal does this shit all the time, and I KNOW that you know this, decon, because I've played games with both of you. I also know that you (as town) would read this quote and would immediately understand what Jackie was doing.
Oh, and your posts are sheepy and feel scummy.
#vote deconduo
|
We forgot to add it in all the role PMs, but as a general announcement, you are not allowed to reveal your post restrictions.
|
On August 14 2011 05:12 Kavdragon wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 05:08 Curu wrote:
Well until something else comes up
##Vote Flamewheel
Let's see what he has to say. No no, it's Walton we need to go after! We must find Walton. I'm offering a reward for who can find Walton. The person to secure his death will receive the Brown Medallion of Awesome! Why would you jump on someone so easily anyways? Very odd.
Mostly because I thought Town would stop their stupid incessant trolling. Apparently not.
If I had wanted somewhere easy to park my vote Kurumi/Jackal/Kenpachi were much better targets.
On August 14 2011 05:13 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 14 2011 04:50 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:41 deconduo wrote:On August 14 2011 04:36 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:32 deconduo wrote:On August 14 2011 04:28 Curu wrote:On August 14 2011 04:24 deconduo wrote:On August 13 2011 22:25 BarBaPoPPa wrote:On August 13 2011 19:31 deconduo wrote:
/confirm
Right, we got us here an interesting situation with the majority lynch rules. Unless we have a shortlist of targets by say 24 hours into the day, its going to be pretty fucking difficult to get anyone lynched.
there is no reason to ignore evidence that comes into play later than 24 hours into the day u know? if your gonna just vote some stupid random person, then that's fucking scummy, but it only takes like 2-3 hours to switch the votes if we find scum later in the day. Never said to ignore candidates after 24 hours, I said if we don't have a decent shortlist getting a lynch will be difficult. I also disagree that its possible to turnaround a lynch in 2-3 hours. Even with evidence that someone is 100% scum, because of different timezones its possible that you won't have enough people online. Couple this with the fact that you're never going to get absolute proof, whats more than likely to happen is people start to switch votes and we end up lynching nobody. Anyone that comes in with 'new' evidence just before the deadline and tries to swing a lynch should be vigged. They should have presented the evidence earlier or shut up. On August 14 2011 02:14 Mr. Wiggles wrote:Yeah, Bum is right. I don't think that names and alignment would be linked directly, as it would break the set-up somewhat through mass name-claims. As well, how would we decide what names are what alignment? I see it as people would be able to just twist it as they see fit, as a lot of players have had good games as town and mafia, or can fit into both alignments. For example, Ace is given as an example role for town in the OP, but a lot of people would probably try to argue that he's mafia as well. It's a very insubstantial way of scum hunting that I think we should try to avoid. Anyone pushing for someone's lynch just based on their name is probably scummy. (Or dumb) Also, deconduo had a good post about the lynch rules: On August 13 2011 19:31 deconduo wrote:
/confirm
Right, we got us here an interesting situation with the majority lynch rules. Unless we have a shortlist of targets by say 24 hours into the day, its going to be pretty fucking difficult to get anyone lynched.
People not voting for one of the top three candidates at the end of the day should considered scummy as fuck, especially if we don't reach a majority. We can't have anyone throwing away a vote cos of tunnelling/stupidity/OMGUS. Each vote is vital. I agree with his sentiment, that it will be vital to consolidate votes as the day goes on. We don't want a situation where the vote is split amongst several people each with only a few votes on them, as then we either waste our lynch, or we're forced to try to switch around votes right before the deadline, giving scum a good chance to manipulate the lynch right before it happens. I think a major factor in this, will be people needing to actually think and read, judging who's scummiest, and dropping "protestation" votes and pressure votes (that are for information) before the deadline is up. ----- Jackal is likely telling the truth. He's been pushing for kurumi to be lynched ever since he claimed BM. Its quite unlike him to fake claim a restriction like that, and seeing as no one has CC'd L I believe him. This doesn't reflect on alignments at all, and in fact I would think its more likely for L to be a mafia personality than Bill Murray. However it does us no good to have Kurumi troll, and if Jackal is forced to tunnel him then we have two people that are just posting trash. Lynching Kurumi solves this problem quite nicely. He should be one of the people on our lynch shortlist for sure. So you think it's more likely Jackal is Mafia and Kurumi is Town but you want Kurumi lynched instead? Hi there scum logic. Read the post properly before commenting kthx. People are saying that Kurumi is scum because BM is a scummy personality. I said that L is more likely to be scum if personalities reflected alignment, which I believe they do not. Please show me a single person that said Kurumi is scum because BM is a scummy personality. On August 14 2011 00:25 Jackal58 wrote:
Kurumi/Bill Murray must die. He is 3rd party or scum. There is absolutely no way we can allow a troll playing a troll remain in the game. Lynch him now!!!!! So Jackal, whose entire goal is to get Kurumi killed, says Kurumi is most likely scum because he's Bill Murray... You want them to stop arguing, but you want to lynch Kurumi (who is probably Town). Why not Jackal? He's the one that has to be pushing this only lynch Kurumi garbage. It's unlikely for a Townie to have a goal that is to get one specific Mafia lynched. You asked for an example. I gave you an example. You then proceed to complain that I gave you an example. Scum are never happy it seems. Lynching Jackal doesn't stop Kurumi trolling, whereas lynching Kurumi solves both problems. Jackal can then go back to playing properly and we have a mostly troll free thread instead of a shitfest. Finally I never said that Kurumi should be the only one under discussion, I said that Kurumi would be a good lynch candidate that should be considered. If you feel Jackal should be lynched instead then go ahead and make a case.
The example you gave me was an utterly useless one coming from an utterly useless source yet somehow you want to use it to back up the thought that the general consensus in thread was that Kurumi Bull Murray was scum.
Nope.
|
Fuck. Sorry.
|
On August 14 2011 05:08 Curu wrote:
Well until something else comes up
##Vote Flamewheel
Let's see what he has to say.
You are smarter than this. Did you honestly read that "pm" and believe it was "intercepted" and real? How exactly would it have been intercepted, why would it be signed when the supposed recipient used an alias and even the content is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
