• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:23
CEST 00:23
KST 07:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-67SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)11Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE17
StarCraft 2
General
Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 2/8 August World Ranking: Clem climbs to #2
Tourneys
Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
ASL22 General Discussion Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60
Tourneys
SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6 2v2v2v2 Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The Clem Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3994 users

Pick Their Power Mafia 2 - Page 47

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 45 46 47 48 49 149 Next
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
July 26 2011 11:57 GMT
#921
On July 26 2011 20:51 DropBear wrote:
In fact, what makes Lanaia and redFF good lynches?

Well right now my choices are between lynching based on flavor text, lynching a guy who's only suspicious because he can't stay (Z)Calm, and a policy lynch. Might as well just flip a coin.
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
DropBear
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Australia4428 Posts
July 26 2011 12:00 GMT
#922
...... That isn't going to convince me to get behind you.

You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK?
Sucker for nostalgia
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-26 12:24:25
July 26 2011 12:20 GMT
#923
dammit EBWOP

On July 26 2011 21:00 DropBear wrote:
...... That isn't going to convince me to get behind you.

You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK?

Why not? I randomly picked a person who's relatively inactive and someone who's half trolling and has barely posted anything longer than 3 lines. That's just like you right? You randomly picked between flavor text lynch, policy lynch, and anger lynch right? I mean your reasoning for your vote made a (Z)Nice bloodstain on my wall. Perhaps you can refresh my memory on why BC needs to die?

I'm going to vote for the troll now, redFF. Should be obvious when you click the filter button what I mean.
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
July 26 2011 12:24 GMT
#924
dammit I did not mean to do that
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
July 26 2011 12:25 GMT
#925
EBWOP:

dammit I did not mean to do that THIS SHIT IS (T)Bogus
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
July 26 2011 12:26 GMT
#926
On July 26 2011 13:57 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 13:28 redFF wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:14 supersoft wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:03 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:51 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:40 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:33 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
[quote]

Check the bolded part. In almost every case of someone asking or begging for a dt check they are town or covered role. Most people do this to confirm themselves and thus starting a blue circle that can rofl stomp mafia. It is very common practice for people to want to be cleared as to move through a game with 0 harassment from anyone. No mafia would willingly throw himself up for a dt check as it would screw him in the end. You say no townie would want it used on them, but that would again, leave you a pool of 0 people to check. you are then down to the idea of "we want you checked you let yourself get checked or lynched" which is a horrible way to play.

Seriously, you all are talking about role use being the huge factor in catching people. I now say, everyone go back read pick your power 3 and realize playing lets analyze roles, or someones role means they are legit, etc.... and realize roles do not say shit about the players alignment. Who cares if SS's check is an alignment check if you don't know his alignment. Have a watcher/tracker check him. If he visits anyone at night at this point in time he is mafia. have a dt check him. Dt's could breadcrumb results, or the like. Seriously, before a plan is proposed you sort it out, you make it ideal, you account for multiple situations. So far the only situation proposed by you lot is SS is likely town for shooting a red. Likely town does not mean town.


What? So, instead of using a check, and just leaving it, until we have a second DT out themselves or breadcrumb and die, you're saying never use the check? Did I understand that correctly? Please tell me how what you're trying to say is optimal play. How is not having a check better than having one?

The only situation proposed by you, is that we don't use the check at all. That's asking a claimed and outed DT to not check people or reveal his checks, until another DT checks him. In what world does that make sense?

Ask yourself how you would play this out in a normal game. If a DT claimed, would you ask him to not check anyone until another DT checked him and claimed it? That sounds really dumb to me.


In a normal game, on day 1, if someone claimed dt and said x was red, I would kill the dt first. Every time.

In a setup where mafia, third parties, or town can be a dt, I will never trust the claimant ever on day 1. Nor should anyone else.


Ok, so where's the part where we're trusting him by having him use a check on an agreed upon target? That's what I'm wondering about. You're saying that by letting him check, we're implicitly trusting him to be town, but that is not the case. We can let him sit in unconfirmed limbo for now, but why not use his check? It doesn't hurt us to use his check, the same way that killing the DT actually tells us whether the check is true or not.


By giving him a check we give legitmacy over time to his supposed alignment. Say he is mafia, he checks kita, kita flips town, he gives us a town. That makes him look better as he complied to the check.

Say both kita and SS are red, he says kita is town it still gives both a look of legitmacy. One for complying for the check. Its subtle and its insidious. Someone who is not confirmed you do not let slowly insinuate they are. Had you guys outlined you planned on trusting his check with a grain of salt I would be less worried than i am now.


Of course we'd take it with a grain of salt, I'm taking everything in this game with a grain of salt, because if I trusted everything I read, I'd be pretty silly. That's also why I'm saying we can also check people who aren't major lynch targets yet, and then just ignore the results until someone else confirms SS, he gets shot by mafia, or we even flip him ourselves with a vig.



Now I am seeing the first person with some sense -_-. Wiggles, go back and originally read the use of his role and you will see NO ONE advocated what you did just now. You will see it otherwise and should realize my discontent. What you just proposed is more cautious than everything else in relation to using his role to this point.



hey bc, wanna check?

Bc ignored this post.

On July 26 2011 06:42 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:38 Curu wrote:
You don't know if he suffered his penalty or not Wiggles. It might just be he's roleblocked for tonight, who knows.

BC, would you submit to having supersoft check you?



Nope. As much as being confirmed town benefits town as a whole, it gets me shot by third party / mafia or some asshole townie who thinks they are being a hero.

Instead I will risk getting shot anyway, but the likelyhood of a third party shot or red goes down whereas the option of a townie shooting me is higher. Any med with half a brain will realize I have been trying to make people think and not be stupid and might protect me.

Then posts this.

K so if he inspects you you will be confirmed town, but increases the chance to be shot at by scum/blacks. Then you say that you would like medic protection, surely if you are confirmed town you are more likely to get medic protection? Quote supersoft so you can be alignment checked. If you keep ignoring this issue then i will get you lynched.


Lol you want to force BC to be role checked which has NOTHING to do with the events of Day 1, YET Jackal [Harry Fucking Potter] gets to go without posting since the idea of having Dropbear claim. Once that happens Jackals posting completely stops. Weird huh?


Ya it is. Work happened. I had to go to Juarez Mexico to rescue one of our aircraft that was loaded with car parts and broken. It happens. That's part of my job. If I can't walk the flight crew through a fix I go and fix it for them. I just got back to the shop. I've been gone for about 20 hours.
I'm going home to get some food and some sleep. If you want to lynch me for having a job feel free. Right now I don't really fucking care.
BC and Amber are the two scummiest people in this game. But you all want to lynch me because ON flipped town. I had nothing to do with his role, his alignmen,t his death, or his flip but I'm fucking guilty because I thought I was preventing town from making a mistake. Lynch me. Don't care. Derps.
I'll be back later.
Life can only kill you once.
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
July 26 2011 12:32 GMT
#927
Before I edited, the post looked like this, hopefully this is my (T)Last mistake:

On July 26 2011 21:00 DropBear wrote:
...... That isn't going to convince me to get behind you.

You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK?

Why not? I randomly picked a person who's relatively inactive and someone who's half trolling and has barely posted anything longer than 3 lines. That's just like you right? You randomly picked between flavor text lynch, policy lynch, and anger lynch right? I mean your reasoning for your vote made a Nice bloodstain on my wall. Perhaps you can refresh my memory on why BC needs to die?

I'm going to vote for the troll now, redFF. Should be obvious when you click the filter button what I mean.
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
July 26 2011 12:40 GMT
#928
I am going to (T)MurDeR someone when this game is over
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
DropBear
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Australia4428 Posts
July 26 2011 12:41 GMT
#929
On July 26 2011 21:20 Foolishness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 21:00 DropBear wrote:
...... That isn't going to convince me to get behind you.

You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK?

Why not? I randomly picked a person who's relatively inactive and someone who's half trolling and has barely posted anything longer than 3 lines. That's just like you right? You randomly picked between flavor text lynch, policy lynch, and anger lynch right? I mean your reasoning for your vote made a nice bloodstain on my wall. Perhaps you can refresh my memory on why BC needs to die?

I'm going to vote for the troll now, redFF. Should be obvious when you click the filter button what I mean.

I have said before that jackal, the flavour text lynch is a bad idea. It is interesting that he is disappeared but it isn't enough of a reason to lynch him.
I don't know who you mean by the policy lynch and the anger lynch but I'm assuming BC is one of them.

I would like to kill BC for a few reasons.

- Firstly for trying to stop supersoft using a DT check. There is no reason to do this.
- Second, because he is shitting up the thread, arguing wildly about something that isn't really that important. When he was my scumcoach for XVIII he advocated this as an underused and highly effective scum strategy.
- Third, because he is strongly suggesting that supersoft could be Mafia which I now know is impossible. We used this argument of "he killed his scumbuddy to buy town cred" to get Palmar lynched over bumatlarge in PTP1. And it's a ridiculous argument.

If supersoft is also Mafia, then he had no need to kill Tackster. I was saying that supersoft killed him, he could have just gone "yeah sorry guys I suck and I used my ability and now Mafia knows who I am "

- Fourth because of his bizarre chainsaw defence of you early on which immediately set off alarm bells for me.

Additionally, if you want me to vote with you at any point in this game, why not show me some reasoning rather than casting insults?
Sucker for nostalgia
DropBear
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Australia4428 Posts
July 26 2011 12:42 GMT
#930
EBWOP, I was saying supersoft killed youngminii
Sucker for nostalgia
Foolishness *
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3044 Posts
July 26 2011 13:10 GMT
#931
On July 26 2011 21:41 DropBear wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 21:20 Foolishness wrote:
On July 26 2011 21:00 DropBear wrote:
...... That isn't going to convince me to get behind you.

You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK?

Why not? I randomly picked a person who's relatively inactive and someone who's half trolling and has barely posted anything longer than 3 lines. That's just like you right? You randomly picked between flavor text lynch, policy lynch, and anger lynch right? I mean your reasoning for your vote made a nice bloodstain on my wall. Perhaps you can refresh my memory on why BC needs to die?

I'm going to vote for the troll now, redFF. Should be obvious when you click the filter button what I mean.

I have said before that jackal, the flavour text lynch is a bad idea. It is interesting that he is disappeared but it isn't enough of a reason to lynch him.
I don't know who you mean by the policy lynch and the anger lynch but I'm assuming BC is one of them.

I would like to kill BC for a few reasons.

- Firstly for trying to stop supersoft using a DT check. There is no reason to do this.
- Second, because he is shitting up the thread, arguing wildly about something that isn't really that important. When he was my scumcoach for XVIII he advocated this as an underused and highly effective scum strategy.
- Third, because he is strongly suggesting that supersoft could be Mafia which I now know is impossible. We used this argument of "he killed his scumbuddy to buy town cred" to get Palmar lynched over bumatlarge in PTP1. And it's a ridiculous argument.

If supersoft is also Mafia, then he had no need to kill Tackster. I was saying that supersoft killed him, he could have just gone "yeah sorry guys I suck and I used my ability and now Mafia knows who I am "

- Fourth because of his bizarre chainsaw defence of you early on which immediately set off alarm bells for me.

Additionally, if you want me to vote with you at any point in this game, why not show me some reasoning rather than casting insults?

1) When the result of the check shows up red and we lynch the person and they flip (P)Green what are you going to do? Kill supersoft?

1a) He flips green. Great, we wasted 2 days minimum and did no scumhunting
1b) He flips red. This is fine since 1 for 1 trade.

When his results turn up green, are you going to kill that person to confirm? No cause that's just silly. So are you going to leave said person alone the rest of the game? If this was a normal game that'd be dandy but this is PTP. There could be framers, roleblockers, heck the mafia may have already converted supersoft to their team by now.

I am for the check but his reasons for not wanting to use it aren't an issue. Let me be clear: BC is worried about the town misusing the information (as am I, that's why I want a check on a random person instead), which is an all too common theme in mafia. His solution to the problem of "the town is going to misuse this information" is preventing the town from getting the information in the first place. Given the track record of the town so far I don't blame him. One mafia is already dead through stupidity why take the chance with a DT check in a game where people have bizarre roles when we can just analyze and let DT's do work later in the game.

And speaking of analyze, redFF is acting just like in BC's game where he flipped red. Make a lot of one liner troll posts, then a 2 paragraph post to try to blend in and/or justify his post, rinse and repeat. That's what he's doing this game too. BC can be held accountable in the near future if he disappears. If he survives this lynch then goes afk we auto lynch him easy. He knows that so no matter what his role is he'll be around. (On the same note, if Jackal continues being afk we should lynch him tomorrow as well.)

2) It's very important whether the check gets used and who it gets used on. I'm banking that one of the people arguing with BC is mafia for the exact reasons you stated.

3) fine, I wouldn't rule it out as impossible since this is PTP mafia, but Occam's Razor says he's town and that's good enough for me.

4) link or it didn't happen. Wait I know this didn't happen so don't bother.
geript: "Foolishness's cases are persuasive and reasonable but leave you feeling dirty afterwards. Kinda like a whore." ---- Manager of the TL Mafia forum, come play!
syllogism
Profile Joined September 2010
Finland5948 Posts
July 26 2011 13:19 GMT
#932
I'm up for lynching Lanaia, Redff or possibly Palmar. I concur with Foolishness' thoughts on BC; I find it quite unlikely he would act like this if he was mafia aligned as he must realize most of the town will immediately jump on him. Refusing to get checked is suspicious, but for now I'm not willing to lynch him based on just that. Palmar has been keeping quite a low profile so far, jumped on the easy and quite weak wagon and done little to no scum hunting so far, which is quite uncharacteristic of him.
DropBear
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Australia4428 Posts
July 26 2011 13:39 GMT
#933
On July 26 2011 22:10 Foolishness wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 21:41 DropBear wrote:
On July 26 2011 21:20 Foolishness wrote:
On July 26 2011 21:00 DropBear wrote:
...... That isn't going to convince me to get behind you.

You didn't answer my question about Wiggles. Why are you so sure he is SK?

Why not? I randomly picked a person who's relatively inactive and someone who's half trolling and has barely posted anything longer than 3 lines. That's just like you right? You randomly picked between flavor text lynch, policy lynch, and anger lynch right? I mean your reasoning for your vote made a nice bloodstain on my wall. Perhaps you can refresh my memory on why BC needs to die?

I'm going to vote for the troll now, redFF. Should be obvious when you click the filter button what I mean.

I have said before that jackal, the flavour text lynch is a bad idea. It is interesting that he is disappeared but it isn't enough of a reason to lynch him.
I don't know who you mean by the policy lynch and the anger lynch but I'm assuming BC is one of them.

I would like to kill BC for a few reasons.

- Firstly for trying to stop supersoft using a DT check. There is no reason to do this.
- Second, because he is shitting up the thread, arguing wildly about something that isn't really that important. When he was my scumcoach for XVIII he advocated this as an underused and highly effective scum strategy.
- Third, because he is strongly suggesting that supersoft could be Mafia which I now know is impossible. We used this argument of "he killed his scumbuddy to buy town cred" to get Palmar lynched over bumatlarge in PTP1. And it's a ridiculous argument.

If supersoft is also Mafia, then he had no need to kill Tackster. I was saying that supersoft killed him, he could have just gone "yeah sorry guys I suck and I used my ability and now Mafia knows who I am "

- Fourth because of his bizarre chainsaw defence of you early on which immediately set off alarm bells for me.

Additionally, if you want me to vote with you at any point in this game, why not show me some reasoning rather than casting insults?

1) When the result of the check shows up red and we lynch the person and they flip (P)Green what are you going to do? Kill supersoft?

1a) He flips green. Great, we wasted 2 days minimum and did no scumhunting
1b) He flips red. This is fine since 1 for 1 trade.

When his results turn up green, are you going to kill that person to confirm? No cause that's just silly. So are you going to leave said person alone the rest of the game? If this was a normal game that'd be dandy but this is PTP. There could be framers, roleblockers, heck the mafia may have already converted supersoft to their team by now.

I am for the check but his reasons for not wanting to use it aren't an issue. Let me be clear: BC is worried about the town misusing the information (as am I, that's why I want a check on a random person instead), which is an all too common theme in mafia. His solution to the problem of "the town is going to misuse this information" is preventing the town from getting the information in the first place. Given the track record of the town so far I don't blame him. One mafia is already dead through stupidity why take the chance with a DT check in a game where people have bizarre roles when we can just analyze and let DT's do work later in the game.

And speaking of analyze, redFF is acting just like in BC's game where he flipped red. Make a lot of one liner troll posts, then a 2 paragraph post to try to blend in and/or justify his post, rinse and repeat. That's what he's doing this game too. BC can be held accountable in the near future if he disappears. If he survives this lynch then goes afk we auto lynch him easy. He knows that so no matter what his role is he'll be around. (On the same note, if Jackal continues being afk we should lynch him tomorrow as well.)

2) It's very important whether the check gets used and who it gets used on. I'm banking that one of the people arguing with BC is mafia for the exact reasons you stated.

3) fine, I wouldn't rule it out as impossible since this is PTP mafia, but Occam's Razor says he's town and that's good enough for me.

4) link or it didn't happen. Wait I know this didn't happen so don't bother.

1. I am not going to kill supersoft. I am going to fight anyone who tries to get him killed. This whole paragraph you wrote there was kind of pointless.

If a supersoft check turns up green, why would you shoot them to confirm? I trust supersoft. I would leave them alone for the time being at least and revisit them later in the game.

Reasons for not wanting a check are a huge issue. Reasons for doing anything are important.

Why deny the information? Not only this, one Mafia is already dead through stupidity? The town's track record is really bad so early in the game? This almost sounds as though you are disappointed that Tackster is dead.

2. To echo Mig, is it important enough to have a 10 page argument about? He isn't actually following his big argument that we should be scumhunting. You admit that the mass argument about it is indeed a good Mafia strategy, yet refuse to entertain the possibility that BC is the Mafia among them. It must be one of the others and not him, right?

3. I'm glad we are in agreement on supersoft being town. BC isn't a noob, if you and I can make this connection he should be able to very easily do so as well. Yet he perpetuates the argument that it is a possibility, when it isn't.

4. This is what I'm talking about. It's a strange response to a question that wasn't in any way accusatory. Here's the link.

On July 25 2011 14:17 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 25 2011 14:13 DropBear wrote:
At the risk of being mauled by youngminii, is there a reason why Foolishness is using TLPD in all his posts so far?



Any reason why you chose to rhyme in your last post? Prob a random accidental click of tlpd


Your hostility regarding this seemingly minor issue is a little strange Master Foolishness. As was his hostility in the original post. I do wonder about you now.

Sucker for nostalgia
Kurumi
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Poland6130 Posts
July 26 2011 13:48 GMT
#934
Banks are so good. Blessing of Chezinu shall purify You!
Also I am most certainly dead Night 2
At least we will net another scum, aye?
Being old and experienced isn't as good as it would seem...
I work alone. // Visit TL Mafia subforum!
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
July 26 2011 14:04 GMT
#935
On July 26 2011 21:26 Jackal58 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2011 13:57 Amber[LighT] wrote:
On July 26 2011 13:28 redFF wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:14 supersoft wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:05 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:03 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:56 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:51 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:44 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 05:40 Mr. Wiggles wrote:
[quote]

What? So, instead of using a check, and just leaving it, until we have a second DT out themselves or breadcrumb and die, you're saying never use the check? Did I understand that correctly? Please tell me how what you're trying to say is optimal play. How is not having a check better than having one?

The only situation proposed by you, is that we don't use the check at all. That's asking a claimed and outed DT to not check people or reveal his checks, until another DT checks him. In what world does that make sense?

Ask yourself how you would play this out in a normal game. If a DT claimed, would you ask him to not check anyone until another DT checked him and claimed it? That sounds really dumb to me.


In a normal game, on day 1, if someone claimed dt and said x was red, I would kill the dt first. Every time.

In a setup where mafia, third parties, or town can be a dt, I will never trust the claimant ever on day 1. Nor should anyone else.


Ok, so where's the part where we're trusting him by having him use a check on an agreed upon target? That's what I'm wondering about. You're saying that by letting him check, we're implicitly trusting him to be town, but that is not the case. We can let him sit in unconfirmed limbo for now, but why not use his check? It doesn't hurt us to use his check, the same way that killing the DT actually tells us whether the check is true or not.


By giving him a check we give legitmacy over time to his supposed alignment. Say he is mafia, he checks kita, kita flips town, he gives us a town. That makes him look better as he complied to the check.

Say both kita and SS are red, he says kita is town it still gives both a look of legitmacy. One for complying for the check. Its subtle and its insidious. Someone who is not confirmed you do not let slowly insinuate they are. Had you guys outlined you planned on trusting his check with a grain of salt I would be less worried than i am now.


Of course we'd take it with a grain of salt, I'm taking everything in this game with a grain of salt, because if I trusted everything I read, I'd be pretty silly. That's also why I'm saying we can also check people who aren't major lynch targets yet, and then just ignore the results until someone else confirms SS, he gets shot by mafia, or we even flip him ourselves with a vig.



Now I am seeing the first person with some sense -_-. Wiggles, go back and originally read the use of his role and you will see NO ONE advocated what you did just now. You will see it otherwise and should realize my discontent. What you just proposed is more cautious than everything else in relation to using his role to this point.



hey bc, wanna check?

Bc ignored this post.

On July 26 2011 06:42 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 26 2011 06:38 Curu wrote:
You don't know if he suffered his penalty or not Wiggles. It might just be he's roleblocked for tonight, who knows.

BC, would you submit to having supersoft check you?



Nope. As much as being confirmed town benefits town as a whole, it gets me shot by third party / mafia or some asshole townie who thinks they are being a hero.

Instead I will risk getting shot anyway, but the likelyhood of a third party shot or red goes down whereas the option of a townie shooting me is higher. Any med with half a brain will realize I have been trying to make people think and not be stupid and might protect me.

Then posts this.

K so if he inspects you you will be confirmed town, but increases the chance to be shot at by scum/blacks. Then you say that you would like medic protection, surely if you are confirmed town you are more likely to get medic protection? Quote supersoft so you can be alignment checked. If you keep ignoring this issue then i will get you lynched.


Lol you want to force BC to be role checked which has NOTHING to do with the events of Day 1, YET Jackal [Harry Fucking Potter] gets to go without posting since the idea of having Dropbear claim. Once that happens Jackals posting completely stops. Weird huh?


Ya it is. Work happened. I had to go to Juarez Mexico to rescue one of our aircraft that was loaded with car parts and broken. It happens. That's part of my job. If I can't walk the flight crew through a fix I go and fix it for them. I just got back to the shop. I've been gone for about 20 hours.
I'm going home to get some food and some sleep. If you want to lynch me for having a job feel free. Right now I don't really fucking care.
BC and Amber are the two scummiest people in this game. But you all want to lynch me because ON flipped town. I had nothing to do with his role, his alignmen,t his death, or his flip but I'm fucking guilty because I thought I was preventing town from making a mistake. Lynch me. Don't care. Derps.
I'll be back later.


Scum.

Get checked by Supersoft or ask for a replacement if you're going to come back with excuses about work. I missed 2 lynches in AA because my work schedule doesn't allow me to post at 9 PM but at least I tried to justify every action I made [as scum too].
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
Curu
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada2817 Posts
July 26 2011 14:08 GMT
#936
BC do you suggest we no lynch today then? Since no one should be posting their suspicions or analysis until they are 100% sure someone is Mafia.
wat
Kurumi
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Poland6130 Posts
July 26 2011 14:09 GMT
#937
haha BC, Amber and Jackal58 estabilisthed an OMGUS circle...
I work alone. // Visit TL Mafia subforum!
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22634 Posts
July 26 2011 14:38 GMT
#938
Just stop arguing with BC guys, it's been 12-13 pages already, despite his protestations we are going to use the check, which is why we're basically just playing a waiting game for supersoft to come back now.

Syllo, this isn't a normal game, this is the real thing.
Computer says mafia
Kurumi
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Poland6130 Posts
July 26 2011 14:49 GMT
#939
By the way guys I have vote restriction So sorry for my votes
I work alone. // Visit TL Mafia subforum!
Jackal58
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4264 Posts
July 26 2011 14:53 GMT
#940
On July 26 2011 23:04 Amber[LighT] wrote:Scum.

Get checked by Supersoft or ask for a replacement if you're going to come back with excuses about work. I missed 2 lynches in AA because my work schedule doesn't allow me to post at 9 PM but at least I tried to justify every action I made [as scum too].

Get over yourself. Why don't you get checked by SS. Your only reason for calling me scum is ON flipped town. Show me anything anywhere that I have posted that pushes a scum agienda. Show me. Link it, quote it. Don't care just show me. You have nothing but what you perceive as a free lynch. You push it without any reason at all. You just say scum. That's how scum play. You get checked scummy.
Life can only kill you once.
Prev 1 45 46 47 48 49 149 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SpeCial 42
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 9717
Artosis 401
HiyA 46
Dota 2
420jenkins422
NeuroSwarm144
capcasts10
League of Legends
Doublelift5185
Counter-Strike
summit1g5555
tarik_tv3399
FalleN 2803
Other Games
Grubby2109
hungrybox743
C9.Mang0292
ToD279
White-Ra112
UpATreeSC110
XaKoH 93
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 42
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 37
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21042
Other Games
• imaqtpie978
• Shiphtur298
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 37m
The PondCast
11h 37m
OSC
11h 37m
INu's Battles
12h 37m
Percival vs Cure
Classic vs Clem
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Escore
1d 11h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 12h
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
[ Show More ]
The Patches Monday
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-04
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W6
Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.