EPT##vote Palmar
World at War 2 Mafia - Page 26
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
##vote Palmar | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
##Vote Mataza | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Kurumi
Poland6130 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:14 syllogism wrote: So with the options being lynching a scummy player (Palmar) and policy lynching a likely townie (ask yourself, is mafia ever going to be doing that on day 1 after we we had agreed to policy lynch anyone for it), why are so many of you going for the latter Message. You can't fuck with the town, You either help us or die. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:14 syllogism wrote: So with the options being lynching a scummy player (Palmar) and policy lynching a likely townie (ask yourself, is mafia ever going to be doing that on day 1 after we we had agreed to policy lynch anyone for it), why are so many of you going for the latter Ask yourself, is mafia ever going to shout foul and argue to the point I've done day 1? The mafia is definitely laughing their asses off because you mistake disagreement for scumtells. Or, quite likely, you're scum and you know we have to lynch Mataza, and this is your way of trying to gain town credit. | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:14 syllogism wrote: So with the options being lynching a scummy player (Palmar) and policy lynching a likely townie (ask yourself, is mafia ever going to be doing that on day 1 after we we had agreed to policy lynch anyone for it), why are so many of you going for the latter Policy is policy for a reason. if we write off every random nuke as "oh, scum would NEVER do that" the then mafia is going to nuke to blend in. We are shutting down that option, now. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:18 GMarshal wrote: Policy is policy for a reason. if we write off every random nuke as "oh, scum would NEVER do that" the then mafia is going to nuke to blend in. We are shutting down that option, now. This. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:14 syllogism wrote: So with the options being lynching a scummy player (Palmar) and policy lynching a likely townie (ask yourself, is mafia ever going to be doing that on day 1 after we we had agreed to policy lynch anyone for it), why are so many of you going for the latter But it makes sense for a conspirator to do it trying to force chain nukes. You defending him does not make you look any better either Also Caller is a spiffing fellow and you should all hope to be like him with your life. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:20 syllogism wrote: Are you going to lynch him even if the nuke didn't go off due to the nuclear phase being over He had the intent to nuke. Yes. Yes we are. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:22 syllogism wrote: The focus on killing Conspirator is misguided. Killing him brings us no closer to winning the game and does not allow us to use nukes freely. It's possible he has some anti-town powers, but we'll likely know that soon enough Im not trying to kill the conspirator. I don't give a damn if he lives or dies as long as we keep from random nuking. I'm enforcing a policy that the majority of the town has agreed to in order to keep order and avoid random nukes. That is all. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:22 syllogism wrote: The focus on killing Conspirator is misguided. Killing him brings us no closer to winning the game and does not allow us to use nukes freely. It's possible he has some anti-town powers, but we'll likely know that soon enough Caller is a BOSS If we don't deter people from using nukes regardless the Scum will use them on us without consequence by punishing nukes it prevents scum using day KP which helps us beat both the conspirators and the scum. | ||
Mig
United States4714 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On July 06 2011 19:23 syllogism wrote: Palmar also nuked, but is that okay because it turned out to be a dud? What's the motivation for announcing you've no nukes as a townie and even demonstrating it 1. I wanted to fire ze missiles at GMarshal 2. I misunderstood sandroba and the rules, which lead to me claiming that I had no nukes. 3. I already announced that my missile was a dud, well before I launched it 4. I wanted to fire ze missiles at GMarshal 5. Since I had claimed anyway, I figured why not prove it. In addition, I'm really wary of Sandroba's plan of nuking daily, with who knows how many retaliatory and random nukes, so a shorter day where we just lynch isn't all bad. 6. I really fucking wanted to fire ze missiles at GMarshal. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
I call upon All Townies to halt and eliminate this clandestine, reckless, and provocative threat to world peace and to stable relations between our nations. I call upon you all further to join in an historic effort to end the perilous arms race and to transform the history of man. You have an opportunity now to move the world back from the abyss of destruction by refraining from any action which will widen or deepen the present crisis, and then by participating in a search for peaceful and permanent solutions. Our goal is not the victory of might, but the vindication of right; not peace at the expense of freedom, but both peace and freedom, here in this hemisphere, and, we hope, around the world. God willing, that goal will be achieved. That is all | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
| ||
