|
On June 30 2011 08:18 sandroba wrote:
Fuckballs, sinani's analysis on his alter ego is actually quite decent. O.O
That's my entire problem, I said it somewhere in the thread that sinani206 is very much capable of stringing together a decent analysis. He's just chosen not to so far and instead hidden behind shit like being afraid of posting.
By the way:
I will not be awake for the lynch. This discussion has been good in my opinion, we have three strong cases and are actively discussing every case.
In the end, I think it'd be best for town to flip them all.
I like the look of town much better than 20 hours ago.
I'm around for 1-2 hours more.
|
On June 30 2011 08:16 sinani206 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 08:13 Jackal58 wrote:
Since we are now inside the "No Shoot" window I'll share my thoughts.
The people I see as scum right now:
Cthsazsa
Lanaia
youngminii
hiro protagonist
Mig
Palmar
sinani206
All of them with the exception of Palmar and to some extent Sinani have been less than active and what little they have posted has either made me a bit uncomfy or just plain set off some bells.
Until Sinani began to defend himself he was on the list of say little without saying anything club.
Palmar you're just trying to fucking hard to be town. Between VisceraEyes and Drazerk, who do you find more scummy?
I find Drazerk to be a derp. VisceraEyes I'm not sold on either way.
|
On June 30 2011 08:18 sandroba wrote:
Fuckballs, sinani's analysis on his alter ego is actually quite decent. O.O
I was literally JUST thinking that...and after I'd just said he never commits to a stance. -.-
|
United States22154 Posts
On June 30 2011 08:26 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 08:18 sandroba wrote:
Fuckballs, sinani's analysis on his alter ego is actually quite decent. O.O I was literally JUST thinking that...and after I'd just said he never commits to a stance. -.-
Whats bothersome is that he had to wait to be leading the wagon to be arsed to post an analysis, to me this reeks of either distancing himself or trying to divert a lynch
bbl I have stuff to do
|
On June 30 2011 08:28 GMarshal wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 08:26 VisceraEyes wrote:On June 30 2011 08:18 sandroba wrote:
Fuckballs, sinani's analysis on his alter ego is actually quite decent. O.O I was literally JUST thinking that...and after I'd just said he never commits to a stance. -.- Whats bothersome is that he had to wait to be leading the wagon to be arsed to post an analysis, to me this reeks of either distancing himself or trying to divert a lynch bbl I have stuff to do
I think the nickname Kenpachi 2.0 is appropriate :D
|
On June 30 2011 08:29 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 08:28 GMarshal wrote:On June 30 2011 08:26 VisceraEyes wrote:On June 30 2011 08:18 sandroba wrote:
Fuckballs, sinani's analysis on his alter ego is actually quite decent. O.O I was literally JUST thinking that...and after I'd just said he never commits to a stance. -.- Whats bothersome is that he had to wait to be leading the wagon to be arsed to post an analysis, to me this reeks of either distancing himself or trying to divert a lynch bbl I have stuff to do I think the nickname Kenpachi 2.0 is appropriate :D
I am honored, sir.
|
In light of 206 triumphant return, I will go back and reread 201's posts. I'm not really convinced, but since I'm catching flak for sticking to my guns against Drazerk, I'm willing to bend in the name of clearing my name.
Palmar, if you DARE say I'm scummy for doing so, so help me.....
|
On June 30 2011 06:35 Sinani201 wrote:
When is Day over?
What happens if the lynch ends up being a tie?
Just over 4 hours remain. If a lynch is tied the first person to receive the most voted gets lynched.
|
GGQ has a bit over 4 hours to do something to avoid being modkilled. Why would you offer to replace someone when you clearly don't have time to participate? Hopefully it's just a one night thing. I've to say your request for the host to take into account your inability to be around when "deciding on the lurker list" is a pretty scummy request.
I'm going to bed in a bit, and I still think Drazerk is the worst lynch out of the three alternatives and Sinani206's voluntary activity despite there not being that much pressure on him is making him look better. Sinani201/Nisani201 seems like a decent vigi possibility tomorrow.
|
Fantastic. I am so excited to hear this analysis only to find out... that it is about me.
*puts on sunglasses* Defense time. My comments on the analysis are in red.
+ Show Spoiler +On June 30 2011 08:07 sinani206 wrote:Nisani201
- Number and length of posts
Nisani201 has 36 posts in the thread, 24 of which are from after the Day 1 post. His mean post length is 2.5 sentences, his mode post length is 2 sentences, and his maximum post length is 6 sentences which he reached 2 times. Just keep these numbers in mind as I continue this analysis.
Those numbers mean anything, and I don't understand why you would waste your time doing all that math and counting. Quality over quantity is what matters. Just because a post is short doesn't mean it can't be useful.
- Contentless posting
Here is an example of one of Nisani201's better posts:
On June 29 2011 07:59 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2011 07:55 sandroba wrote:
@Hiro How about a reason to vote for him? I'm pretty confident syllogism is town. I agree. I just looked through Syllogism's posts. While they may not necessarily all of opinions in them, only two of them seem somewhat pointless, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch. Cthsazsa's analysis on Drazerk seems to be correct and I definitely think that he is scum. And thus, I place my vote. ##Vote: Drazerk
In this post, he simply agrees with sandroba's thoughts that syllogism is town and Cthsazsa's analysis, which showed that Drazerk was scum. He does not provide any new content.
I defended Syllogism with some thoughts on his behaviour. Does that not count as new content?
His other 6-sentence gem:
On June 29 2011 10:33 Sinani201 wrote:
This trend of shooting down spammy players is insanely stupid; it's what lost the town in XVII. Cthasza wrote a fantastic analysis on Drazerk, and if he's right about it then there shouldn't be a reason to lynch him.
I'm voting for Draserk because he is full of contradictions and slip-ups, NOT because of spam.
That is all.
He provides one tiny piece of advice: not to kill spammy players, which is only half-right: lynch scum, shoot spammers. He re-references Cthasza's analysis and defends his vote, but he doesn't give any evidence of Drazerk's "contradictions and slip-ups."\
Right now Viscera is under fire because his analysis was supposedly a repeat of what others have said. It's implied that the contradictions and slip-ups are in Cthsasza's analysis.
These are Nisani201's two longest posts, and both of them are simply parroting what others have said and stating the obvious without adding any new analysis to the table.
Completely wrong, as I've stated in the red.
- Active lurking
Here are some examples of what the average Nisani201 post looks like:
On June 28 2011 11:57 Sinani201 wrote:
No more stupid TF2 Garry's Mod videos.
This is serious business.
The reason why "fluff" is so frowned upon is because it makes it hard to navigate through the thread. Fluff takes space from important things like analysis, defense, and possible scumslips. This post was at the very beginning, so it's stupid to say that it is a "fluff" post.
On June 28 2011 14:15 Sinani201 wrote:
Sorry, bad formatting.
Please change my name on the player list to "Nisani201 (Sinani201)" as that is what I should be known as throughout the game
I don't understand how this is fluff. I said it because there was a post before it where someone named me Sinani, which is what I want to avoid.
On June 28 2011 14:40 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 14:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
I enjoy how GMarshal included Palmar on the Vet list, yet his first game was my first game as well. Yes, he had a strong showing for Mafia that game...but in all honesty, scum won from an inactive town. I wonder what motivation GMarshal has putting a new player like Palmar (if you'd like to see an example of his 'stellar town play', may I direct you to PTP?) in the 'Vet' side of that list. He's certainly no vet as far as I'm concerned.
Palmar is not in this game, he submitted /out soon before the game started. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=237124¤tpage=6#109
Though this ended up not being true, it was new content that I was bringing attention to the other players. They later thanked me for telling them.
On June 29 2011 01:41 Sinani201 wrote:
The roles should have been randomized, likely with random.org. I doubt that RoL "strategically" planted roles on each of us.
This was in response to your post about how it would be unlikely for us to be on the same alignment. I thought that you had been mistaken on how the roles were generated. I was wrong but remember that I am a newbie so I don't know how everything works.
On June 30 2011 06:35 Sinani201 wrote:
When is Day over?
What happens if the lynch ends up being a tie?
This isn't fluff, it's a question.
These are all bits of information that are not useful to the town in any way and questions that can easily be answered by reading the OP. He makes these posts because he doesn't want to have to post content, but he doesn't want to seem inactive.
- Scummy play
On June 28 2011 12:21 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 12:15 sinani206 wrote:
Blues should play however and whenever they want. I shouldn't even have to mention that the townie is the most important role in the game. Analysis wins games, not blues. Let's get some pressure going.
I'm pretty annoying, so I'm going to pressure ##Vote: Sinani201 into being active because I know how much time he spends sitting at his computer and I don't want him to die from lurker KP his first game.
If someone dies from lurker KP, do they get banlisted? You're already voting for me? First off, I am not Sinani201. I'm Nisani201. Second of all, if you want me to make a post, you could have asked nicely. I don't have anything to contribute yet. I'm reading every single post, and when I feel like I have enough information, I will contribute.
First, I pressure him into posting and he responds by saying that he will contribute when he has enough information. Let's see what he means by contribute:
On June 28 2011 13:24 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 13:22 chaos13 wrote:
Would somebody mind assembling a list of the skilled/veteran players for myself and the others who are not familiar with all the names in the roster? A 'priority list', if you will, of players mafia are likely to kill first. From this, it seems like you are either trying to help the Mafia, or softclaiming medic. Or perhaps trying to help the medic.
This is his "analysis" of chaos13, where he points out that he is either Mafia or Medic. This contribution does not help town at all. The fact that he could be on either side is useless, and pointing out that he could be Medic helps Mafia, as GMarshal pointed out.
It's not analysis, it's a comment, a contribution if you will. If I were trying to help the Mafia I would have been able to tell them in PM.
His next "contribution:"
On June 29 2011 09:38 Sinani201 wrote:
I don't really understand how the first quote from him is a scumslip. The second one is iffy; I could see why you might think it's suspicious but it could by no means be used as a primary argument.
He is referring my supposed scumslips which were posted by sandroba. He refuses to take a stance on my play. He is acting extremely safe and neutral, which is a scummy trait.
[red]It's Day 1, so evidence can't always be 100%. I also don't want to be put under fire for taking a too aggressive stance on topics.
A more recent post:
On June 30 2011 00:40 Sinani201 wrote:
Drazerk has posts that give off scumtells. For Viscera, it's a lack of posts.
I don't understand why the bandwagon against Drazerk is a bad thing. A lot of people are voting for him. That just means Cthsasa's analysis against him was good. It's not OMGUS, it's just agreement.
He says that a lot of people are voting for Drazerk because Cthazsa's analysis was good. I assume he was talking about himself as well when he said this. He subtly explains that he is voting because of the analysis, not because he actually thought that Drazerk was scummy. This is a major scumslip. He is basically saying he found a good analysis to hide behind.
The point of an analysis is to convince other people to vote for someone. Cthazsa's analysis convinced me to vote for Drazerk.
Finally, he says this in response to Drazerk's analysis of me:
On June 30 2011 04:09 Sinani201 wrote:
You're trying to draw attention away from the large amount of votes you have accumulated. We have pretty much established that you are scum so why should anyone trust you?
This is a scummy post because Drazerk's analysis of me was good because it could have started some healthy discussion, and as scum, Nisani201 would want to stop all discussion, which he does, which proves his scumminess.
My comment on the analysis did not take away any potential for discussion. I was simply stating my opinion. If anyone else has opinions on it, by all means tell us.
That took an hour and a half to write. Whew. My vote will stay on VisceraEyes today, but tomorrow, I urge all of you to vote for Nisani 201. Thank you, good sirs.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On June 30 2011 09:03 Sinani201 wrote:Fantastic. I am so excited to hear this analysis only to find out... that it is about me. *puts on sunglasses* Defense time. My comments on the analysis are in red. + Show Spoiler +On June 30 2011 08:07 sinani206 wrote:Nisani201
- Number and length of posts
Nisani201 has 36 posts in the thread, 24 of which are from after the Day 1 post. His mean post length is 2.5 sentences, his mode post length is 2 sentences, and his maximum post length is 6 sentences which he reached 2 times. Just keep these numbers in mind as I continue this analysis.
Those numbers mean anything, and I don't understand why you would waste your time doing all that math and counting. Quality over quantity is what matters. Just because a post is short doesn't mean it can't be useful.
I used Excel, FYI, and most to all of your posts are useless.
- Contentless posting
Here is an example of one of Nisani201's better posts:
On June 29 2011 07:59 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 29 2011 07:55 sandroba wrote:
@Hiro How about a reason to vote for him? I'm pretty confident syllogism is town. I agree. I just looked through Syllogism's posts. While they may not necessarily all of opinions in them, only two of them seem somewhat pointless, which isn't enough to warrant a lynch. Cthsazsa's analysis on Drazerk seems to be correct and I definitely think that he is scum. And thus, I place my vote. ##Vote: Drazerk
In this post, he simply agrees with sandroba's thoughts that syllogism is town and Cthsazsa's analysis, which showed that Drazerk was scum. He does not provide any new content.
I defended Syllogism with some thoughts on his behaviour. Does that not count as new content?
There was no active defense of Syllogism in this post. You parroted sandroba to try to gain towncred.
His other 6-sentence gem:
On June 29 2011 10:33 Sinani201 wrote:
This trend of shooting down spammy players is insanely stupid; it's what lost the town in XVII. Cthasza wrote a fantastic analysis on Drazerk, and if he's right about it then there shouldn't be a reason to lynch him.
I'm voting for Draserk because he is full of contradictions and slip-ups, NOT because of spam.
That is all.
He provides one tiny piece of advice: not to kill spammy players, which is only half-right: lynch scum, shoot spammers. He re-references Cthasza's analysis and defends his vote, but he doesn't give any evidence of Drazerk's "contradictions and slip-ups."\
Right now Viscera is under fire because his analysis was supposedly a repeat of what others have said. It's implied that the contradictions and slip-ups are in Cthsasza's analysis.
The first sentence of your argument doesn't apply to your post in any way, and you should have provided which specific examples of Drazerk's posts you thought were "contradictions and slip-ups" and possibly have contributed more of them.
These are Nisani201's two longest posts, and both of them are simply parroting what others have said and stating the obvious without adding any new analysis to the table.
Completely wrong, as I've stated in the red.
Completely right, as I've stated in the green.
- Active lurking
Here are some examples of what the average Nisani201 post looks like:
On June 28 2011 11:57 Sinani201 wrote:
No more stupid TF2 Garry's Mod videos.
This is serious business.
The reason why "fluff" is so frowned upon is because it makes it hard to navigate through the thread. Fluff takes space from important things like analysis, defense, and possible scumslips. This post was at the very beginning, so it's stupid to say that it is a "fluff" post.
It was part of a rush to make sure you were one of the first to post so that you weren't frowned upon later for lurking. Even though it didn't get in the way of anything, it's still a useless, spammy post.
On June 28 2011 14:15 Sinani201 wrote:
Sorry, bad formatting.
Please change my name on the player list to "Nisani201 (Sinani201)" as that is what I should be known as throughout the game
I don't understand how this is fluff. I said it because there was a post before it where someone named me Sinani, which is what I want to avoid.
You said this at least 2 times before the game, I don't see the need to keep spamming it to increase your post count.
On June 28 2011 14:40 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 14:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
I enjoy how GMarshal included Palmar on the Vet list, yet his first game was my first game as well. Yes, he had a strong showing for Mafia that game...but in all honesty, scum won from an inactive town. I wonder what motivation GMarshal has putting a new player like Palmar (if you'd like to see an example of his 'stellar town play', may I direct you to PTP?) in the 'Vet' side of that list. He's certainly no vet as far as I'm concerned.
Palmar is not in this game, he submitted /out soon before the game started. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=237124¤tpage=6#109
Though this ended up not being true, it was new content that I was bringing attention to the other players. They later thanked me for telling them.
It was new content, but not related to the game. I wouldn't have a problem with this type of post if you actually analysed people, but all you do is parrot. This probably seemed to you like a good chance to make a post to improve your towncred.
On June 29 2011 01:41 Sinani201 wrote:
The roles should have been randomized, likely with random.org. I doubt that RoL "strategically" planted roles on each of us.
This was in response to your post about how it would be unlikely for us to be on the same alignment. I thought that you had been mistaken on how the roles were generated. I was wrong but remember that I am a newbie so I don't know how everything works.
It was still a useless post that increased your post count. Again, a post like this is fine if you are contributing, but you are falsely contributing with each of these posts.
On June 30 2011 06:35 Sinani201 wrote:
When is Day over?
What happens if the lynch ends up being a tie?
This isn't fluff, it's a question.
All of the information can be found in the OP. There's no need to ask it in the thread.
These are all bits of information that are not useful to the town in any way and questions that can easily be answered by reading the OP. He makes these posts because he doesn't want to have to post content, but he doesn't want to seem inactive.
- Scummy play
On June 28 2011 12:21 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 12:15 sinani206 wrote:
Blues should play however and whenever they want. I shouldn't even have to mention that the townie is the most important role in the game. Analysis wins games, not blues. Let's get some pressure going.
I'm pretty annoying, so I'm going to pressure ##Vote: Sinani201 into being active because I know how much time he spends sitting at his computer and I don't want him to die from lurker KP his first game.
If someone dies from lurker KP, do they get banlisted? You're already voting for me? First off, I am not Sinani201. I'm Nisani201. Second of all, if you want me to make a post, you could have asked nicely. I don't have anything to contribute yet. I'm reading every single post, and when I feel like I have enough information, I will contribute.
First, I pressure him into posting and he responds by saying that he will contribute when he has enough information. Let's see what he means by contribute:
On June 28 2011 13:24 Sinani201 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 28 2011 13:22 chaos13 wrote:
Would somebody mind assembling a list of the skilled/veteran players for myself and the others who are not familiar with all the names in the roster? A 'priority list', if you will, of players mafia are likely to kill first. From this, it seems like you are either trying to help the Mafia, or softclaiming medic. Or perhaps trying to help the medic.
This is his "analysis" of chaos13, where he points out that he is either Mafia or Medic. This contribution does not help town at all. The fact that he could be on either side is useless, and pointing out that he could be Medic helps Mafia, as GMarshal pointed out.
It's not analysis, it's a comment, a contribution if you will. If I were trying to help the Mafia I would have been able to tell them in PM.
You analysed his post, therefore this is an analysis. You probably did it in the thread to increase your post count.
His next "contribution:"
On June 29 2011 09:38 Sinani201 wrote:
I don't really understand how the first quote from him is a scumslip. The second one is iffy; I could see why you might think it's suspicious but it could by no means be used as a primary argument.
He is referring my supposed scumslips which were posted by sandroba. He refuses to take a stance on my play. He is acting extremely safe and neutral, which is a scummy trait.
It's Day 1, so evidence can't always be 100%. I also don't want to be put under fire for taking a too aggressive stance on topics.
Why don't you want to be put under fire? Is it because your're scared that somebody will find out that you're scum?
A more recent post:
On June 30 2011 00:40 Sinani201 wrote:
Drazerk has posts that give off scumtells. For Viscera, it's a lack of posts.
I don't understand why the bandwagon against Drazerk is a bad thing. A lot of people are voting for him. That just means Cthsasa's analysis against him was good. It's not OMGUS, it's just agreement.
He says that a lot of people are voting for Drazerk because Cthazsa's analysis was good. I assume he was talking about himself as well when he said this. He subtly explains that he is voting because of the analysis, not because he actually thought that Drazerk was scummy. This is a major scumslip. He is basically saying he found a good analysis to hide behind.
The point of an analysis is to convince other people to vote for someone. Cthazsa's analysis convinced me to vote for Drazerk.
Well of course you can give a reason now, but you scumslipped earlier.
Finally, he says this in response to Drazerk's analysis of me:
On June 30 2011 04:09 Sinani201 wrote:
You're trying to draw attention away from the large amount of votes you have accumulated. We have pretty much established that you are scum so why should anyone trust you?
This is a scummy post because Drazerk's analysis of me was good because it could have started some healthy discussion, and as scum, Nisani201 would want to stop all discussion, which he does, which proves his scumminess.
My comment on the analysis did not take away any potential for discussion. I was simply stating my opinion. If anyone else has opinions on it, by all means tell us.
Again, you can say that now, but the way you phrased it felt like you were trying to finalize the fact that he was mafia and have no one else listen to him
That took an hour and a half to write. Whew. My vote will stay on VisceraEyes today, but tomorrow, I urge all of you to vote for Nisani 201. Thank you, good sirs.
Of course your responses are in red, because that is the color of your role. My response responses are in green.
|
On June 30 2011 07:22 Lanaia wrote:Show nested quote +On June 30 2011 05:24 Palmar wrote:On June 30 2011 05:14 Varpulis wrote:
First things first: Palmar, stop calling yourself the brother protector and guide of the town, please. The more you try to call for authority the more suspicious i get. That said, I agree with your big post about how to play (win), and your lists.
If you don't like jokes, (which calling myself a title used by qaddafi obvously is) just skip them. I hope you aren't really so thick that you can't tell a tiny joke inside a serious post. And yes, I said I was taking the reins and I will be calling for authority. Obviously everyone should follow me because after exploring the situation with a critical mind they agree I'm acting in the best interest of town. Call me out when I'm wrong, but at the moment, I intend to keep attempting to lead the town and help get us going in the right direction. I expect more help from you in the coming days Varpulis, you're a good player but sometimes you just seem to disappear. Palmar, I'd tone down on that a little bit. Just in case, you know? It's something that shouldn't be declared so loudly in a game. Just like the last game I played with Kenpachi and he called himself a faithful bodybag which made me feel he was scum (both BGs had died).
I think I said this somewhere else. I need to be controversial, arrogant and aggressive if I mean to lead a town of 30 people. This means people will put up fingers against me, which I will gladly shoot down again.
I honestly believe that I have helped improve the atmosphere in town with my claim to leadership. I don't expect everyone to follow me, in fact I don't want everyone to follow me. Discussion like the one that has happened here tonight is great for the town, it's based on logic and analysis, instead of people throwing out blanket statements on how the game should be played.
But yes, I need to sleep now, I'm not staying up until 5am
I stand by the VisceraEyes lynch. And I hope our compulsive vigilante will use his best judgement and shoot one of the other lynch nominees after the cycle.
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Right I am going to bed, 206 you have actually picked up but I am keeping my vote on you for today if you carry on through tomorrow ill look into 201 ( Originally suspected so good pick up )
If I die while i am a sleep, well GG it was fun
|
Mataza has subbed in for Aprudds
|
*slowclap* Congratulations Palmar, you've successfully led a lynch of a townie. Your leadership skills are....astounding.
Oh, I guess before I die I should go ahead and claim.
I am a Detective, and I've had a guilty on Draz since I posted my analysis. I'm sorry that I had to come out like this, but you guys are about to make the biggest mistake of the game and I figured something had to be done.
For the record, this is why I've been inactive. This is literally the FIRST time I've been given a meaningful power-role that didn't involve dying, so I didn't want to fuck it up. And with the blue-sniping of XLII, I was scared SHITLESS to post. But I can assure you, Drazerk is guilty, and HE should be hanging today, not me.
|
Looking at all of the lynch candidates' posts side-by-side, it actually looks to me like Drazerk is the weakest of the three :x I disagree with VE's assessment of him-- he's been portrayed as more erratic than his posts actually were content-wise (probably partially due to his weird writing style), and I don't see how saying 'when I flip green that proves GM is green too' does anything to show he's scum. If he did die and flip red, no one would then jump on GM for being scum.
206 still looks like a spammy/disinterested town.
VE, on the other hand, manages to argue with people and comment on happenings without ever saying a word. I'm sold, he's got my vote for today.
|
On June 30 2011 08:56 syllogism wrote:GGQ has a bit over 4 hours to do something to avoid being modkilled. Why would you offer to replace someone when you clearly don't have time to participate? Hopefully it's just a one night thing. I've to say your request for the host to take into account your inability to be around when "deciding on the lurker list" is a pretty scummy request. I'm going to bed in a bit, and I still think Drazerk is the worst lynch out of the three alternatives and Sinani206's voluntary activity despite there not being that much pressure on him is making him look better. Sinani201/Nisani201 seems like a decent vigi possibility tomorrow.
Derp derp, why would you assume shit when you don't have a clue what you are talking about?
I'm aware of when I have to cast a vote to avoid modkill, don't worry. I havent done shit yet this game because it was past 25 pages when I joined and I haven't caught up yet. I'd rather not vote until I catch up on the thread, but if it makes you feel better, I'll vote now based on what I've read so far. I don't think any of the candidates atm are ideal, but I think the best is drazerk, so I'm voting for him. I have nothing against viscera who is currently leading the lynch, but maybe something shows up in the next few pages, I dunno.
Also, my 'request' was just a notification to the third party that I work most days and can only post in the evenings, so there's only a ~6 hour span where I'm going to be posting things, no matter my alignment. Also, no matter my alignment I don't want to be on the lurker list for obvious reasons. Can you explain why you think this is scummy?
|
oh hey look a last-minute claim
|
On June 30 2011 09:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
*slowclap* Congratulations Palmar, you've successfully led a lynch of a townie. Your leadership skills are....astounding.
Oh, I guess before I die I should go ahead and claim.
I am a Detective, and I've had a guilty on Draz since I posted my analysis. I'm sorry that I had to come out like this, but you guys are about to make the biggest mistake of the game and I figured something had to be done.
For the record, this is why I've been inactive. This is literally the FIRST time I've been given a meaningful power-role that didn't involve dying, so I didn't want to fuck it up. And with the blue-sniping of XLII, I was scared SHITLESS to post. But I can assure you, Drazerk is guilty, and HE should be hanging today, not me.
I'm willing to test that.
|
United States22154 Posts
On June 30 2011 09:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
*slowclap* Congratulations Palmar, you've successfully led a lynch of a townie. Your leadership skills are....astounding.
Oh, I guess before I die I should go ahead and claim.
I am a Detective, and I've had a guilty on Draz since I posted my analysis. I'm sorry that I had to come out like this, but you guys are about to make the biggest mistake of the game and I figured something had to be done.
For the record, this is why I've been inactive. This is literally the FIRST time I've been given a meaningful power-role that didn't involve dying, so I didn't want to fuck it up. And with the blue-sniping of XLII, I was scared SHITLESS to post. But I can assure you, Drazerk is guilty, and HE should be hanging today, not me.
DT claim means its time to hang Drazek. If he flips anything but red your ass is toast.
##Unvote
##Vote: Drazek
this is entirely against my read on drazek, but DT checks rarely lie.
GOGOGOGO VOTESWITCH.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
