Real Time Mafia - Page 33

On June 30 2011 04:09 Sinani201 wrote:
You're trying to draw attention away from the large amount of votes you have accumulated. We have pretty much established that you are scum so why should anyone trust you?

On June 29 2011 23:34 chaos13 wrote:
Well here is what I have seen after waking up and reading through the past few pages of the thread.

We start out with a bandwagon on Drazerk with seemingly no resistance. A DT dies, after he had been tunneling Drazerk. For some reason this convinces everyone to jump off of his bandwagon. MAJOR target deflection onto VisceraEyes, someone who it isn't likely TAA checked, based on his posts. Target deflection is a good way to resist a bandwagon without being obvious.
On the VisceraEyes lynch, I see a bandwagon that is even faster and less resisted than Drazerks was.
Let's also note that syllogism was gaining a fair number of votes before TAA died.

So tell me, what real reason do you guys have for changing your votes off of Drazerk? What really changed when TAA died?

Here is what I propose. A vig shoots Drazerk. We lynch syllogism or VisceraEyes. All three of these players have very good cases against them. Tomorrow a vig uses their lurker shot on ~OpZ~, a veteran player who has been lurking and is entirely aware of it, and doesn't seem to care about it. People have also brought up sinani206 again. After reading through his posts, he seems more like an inexperienced townie than a mafia.

On June 30 2011 04:18 ~OpZ~ wrote:
....lmao...Look, I just want to lynch Sinani201, or 206, to make the thread easier to follow.

On June 29 2011 05:39 TheAwesomeAll wrote:
Drazerk gives me really strong strong scum vibes. Though at this point it doesnt make much sense anymore. Care to explain why you started to attack the sinani's? Hitting them doesnt make sense to me at all, they are playing anti town, but not scum. Everything pointed at GM at that point. Killing them seems a bit premature. so if drazerkcan explain that a bit more would be nice.
syllo, stop taking everything so personal, and stop arguing makes you look bad/scum also makes it hard for me to read you.
Cya in the morning guys, hope i wont be dead <3

On June 30 2011 02:57 Palmar wrote:


♥

On June 30 2011 02:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
Cue Palmar tunnel. Every game I play with you is the same.

*sigh*

On June 30 2011 04:31 Mig wrote:
I really would urge people to switch from draz onto Visc.

Draz's martyr post I still think is suspicious but there is at least some chance I could be wrong and he is just a desperate townie trying to convince us of his innocence.

I think there is a much much higher chance that Visc is mafia. I know meta isn't everything but looking through Visc's posts it is amazing how different he is. Visc not taking stands and randomly accusing people is like dropbear not making millions of useless pbp analysis or kenpachi actually contributing, it is a 180 degree shift in play. I really can't emphasis this point strongly enough.

And not only is it a change in play, but it is a shift that would greatly hurt town. There is no reason for him as town to decide to just stop contributing and giving his opinions on people when that is his norm. It is much more likely for him to play this way as mafia.

On June 30 2011 04:35 ~OpZ~ wrote:


DTCHEGMKC

DT Check GM?, or Drazerk? is it a command? Was he actually breadcrumbing? Is this a coincidence....WE MAY NEVER KNOW.

I'm fine lynching GM, while we all are bsing, but that can wait a few days I guess...Drazerk or VE is perfectly fine with me...unless someone wants to lynch a sinani....

On June 30 2011 04:43 Mig wrote:
I don't want to really distract away from lynching VE but sinani's you guys are both ridiculously suspicious.

Neither of you post very much and all your posts are completely useless. But you are obviously active because you respond as soon as someone targets you. The very definition of someone lurking.

206 you decided to vote for VE because he hadn't done any analysis. Where is your analysis? Have you actually done any analysis this entire game?

And then there is this this post.



This was completely nonsensical, there was absolutely no reason the IRC discussion would scare anyone from posting. It is like you are looking for an excuse to not contribute and help.

I still think the case against VE is stronger but I think 206 would be a great vig shot.

On June 30 2011 04:48 sinani206 wrote:
I voted for VE because he promised analysis and didn't deliver, and when he did, it wasn't as good as he hyped it up to be. He probably took like 10 minutes to write that. I acknowledge that I haven't found anyone outstandingly scummy to do an analysis of. What do you want me to do, apologize?

On June 30 2011 04:54 Mig wrote:


How can you not find anything scummy to analyze lol? Practically everyone else in the game has done at least some analysis.

I mean it isn't hard. If you want to contribute just post your thoughts on the other players, who you suspect and why. I mean surely after 30 pages you have some people you are more suspicious of than others.

On June 30 2011 04:48 sinani206 wrote:
I voted for VE because he promised analysis and didn't deliver, and when he did, it wasn't as good as he hyped it up to be. He probably took like 10 minutes to write that. I acknowledge that I haven't found anyone outstandingly scummy to do an analysis of. What do you want me to do, apologize?

On June 30 2011 04:57 sinani206 wrote:


GM.

I can't explain though, it's just so hard to get this out of my head. It may be because of his leading, but for some reason I just find him extremely scummy.