|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
Oh, and the list of forbidden curses are: Avada Kedavra - The Killing Curse (instant death, no trace) Crucio - The Cruciatus Curse (Inflicts excruciating pain on the recipient of the curse. ) Imperio - The Imperius Curse (Causes the victim to perform the unquestioned bidding of the caster.)
We can safely assume any of these are in play.
|
Since he campaigned so intensely for MFM, he must have some imba abilities that would help his alignment.
|
On December 14 2010 11:26 why wrote: It seems likely he's one of the two patil sisters. why?
|
On December 14 2010 11:25 orgolove wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 11:22 Kenpachi wrote:On December 14 2010 11:21 Mr.Zergling wrote:On December 14 2010 11:17 Kenpachi wrote: LSB. IS. NOT. FUCKING. MAFIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA So he is part of a confirmed group of townies? With you maybe? yes! and yes! How the hell did you confirm that he's a townie? We've seen that there's 3 types of detectives - role detective, name detective, alignment detective. How are you so sure that he's confirmed?
There are different town-aligned groups in the game. How could you not have known unless you are...MAFIA.
|
On December 14 2010 11:37 oddo123 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 11:25 orgolove wrote:On December 14 2010 11:22 Kenpachi wrote:On December 14 2010 11:21 Mr.Zergling wrote:On December 14 2010 11:17 Kenpachi wrote: LSB. IS. NOT. FUCKING. MAFIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA So he is part of a confirmed group of townies? With you maybe? yes! and yes! How the hell did you confirm that he's a townie? We've seen that there's 3 types of detectives - role detective, name detective, alignment detective. How are you so sure that he's confirmed? There are different town-aligned groups in the game. How could you not have known unless you are...MAFIA. What?????
|
On December 14 2010 11:31 Kenpachi wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 11:26 why wrote: It seems likely he's one of the two patil sisters. why?
I don't have a particular reason other than that it seems overpowered to have two mason groups in play and no one else is chiming in with you which makes it likely its a two person group. What's the obvious two person group? Patil sisters. Regardless, I'm willing to hold off on LSB for now based on your word.
|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
On December 14 2010 11:37 oddo123 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 11:25 orgolove wrote:On December 14 2010 11:22 Kenpachi wrote:On December 14 2010 11:21 Mr.Zergling wrote:On December 14 2010 11:17 Kenpachi wrote: LSB. IS. NOT. FUCKING. MAFIAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA So he is part of a confirmed group of townies? With you maybe? yes! and yes! How the hell did you confirm that he's a townie? We've seen that there's 3 types of detectives - role detective, name detective, alignment detective. How are you so sure that he's confirmed? There are different town-aligned groups in the game. How could you not have known unless you are...MAFIA.
... What? I know there's the existence of ONE group so far. But multiple groups? How do you know about that? Further, did you not read what I wrote? Which detective did they use to confirm LSB's town?
|
Vatican City State1650 Posts
On December 14 2010 11:42 why wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 11:31 Kenpachi wrote:On December 14 2010 11:26 why wrote: It seems likely he's one of the two patil sisters. why? I don't have a particular reason other than that it seems overpowered to have two mason groups in play and no one else is chiming in with you which makes it likely its a two person group. What's the obvious two person group? Patil sisters. Regardless, I'm willing to hold off on LSB for now based on your word.
Oh. Right. The Twins. That makes sense. But how do you know he's not a red... I don't trust him at all. A blue would not ask for a secret vote.
|
I was told there was one group as well and that LSB was not a part of it...
kenpachi please explain
|
It's also weird that Kenpachi is only defending LSB now, and with little provocation, when LSB was attacked plenty yesterday with no defense from Kenpachi. Perhaps LSB and Kenpachi just joined the group on D2? That throws my Patil idea out the window.
|
I agree we should not argue about my mason group because as of now, we don't have information that help deciding who to lynch.
Why is Kenpachi protecting LSB and why LSB hasn't defend himself? Kenpachi is very hard to analyze since he acts illogically. LSB who I consider as veteran player should have gave an explanation why he is town. They may be in a circle and maybe a third member can step in and confirm it.
|
Right now I'm just observing what's going on. I left enough hints to lead you in the right direction.
I've already character claimed somewhere in this thread. It's very subtle, but important.
Btw, don't publically state it. Just PM me. (And No, I am not one of the Patils).
|
On December 14 2010 12:14 LSB wrote: Right now I'm just observing what's going on. I left enough hints to lead you in the right direction.
I've already character claimed somewhere in this thread. It's very subtle, but important.
Btw, don't publically state it. Just PM me. (And No, I am not one of the Patils). Why would you something like that? We started with 23 townies and 8 scums. Most/some of the townies work independently and the 8 scums work together.
That means most/some townies are on their own and mafia works together. If the townie who work alone can't find your hint, then they won't get the information. If one of the mafia find your hint, then all mafias get the information.
BTW, I can't find your information either.
|
On December 11 2010 12:10 LSB wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2010 12:04 CubEdIn wrote:On December 11 2010 11:58 LSB wrote:On December 11 2010 11:51 CubEdIn wrote:On December 11 2010 11:38 LSB wrote:What will I do as mayor I will hold a secrete ballot for the first elections. And I will post who voted for who afterwards. You know, mafia loves to redirect the first election? This will make it harder for them to. This is important for many reasons. Say we're going to lynch inactives. One is mafia, one is town Mafia: "Yo! Lets bandwagon this guy!" Town: "We'll their both inactive so I guess I'll vote for the town" Annul: "You guys lynched a townie. Sheep =P" Now. Imagine my system LSB: "Person A and Person B are inactive, please send me pm for who you vote for" Town sends PMs. Each person has about a 50% chance of dieng. Mafia doesn't have that much influence. Annul: "This person is mafia! Woot Woot!" In addition, I will not be able to influence the vote because I will post who voted for who afterwards. So if you see something messed up, you can call me out of it. (Of course, this also means that we got a great way to catch mafia). Let me tell you the loophole in your plan there, buddy. Say you're mafia. People choose two people to lynch, townie and mafia. You rig the "anonymous" votes and lynch the townie, even though most people voted for the mafia. You can never be checked/blamed for that since people agreed to secret votes. So yeah, that's not gonna be in the best interest of town IMO. In addition, I will not be able to influence the vote because I will post who voted for who afterwards. So if you see something messed up, you can call me out of it. (Of course, this also means that we got a great way to catch mafia). People will be like, "YOU ARE WRONG!" if I try to manipulate votes. Oh right, I didn't read that part, but it still gives you a certain degree of manipulation by hiding some mafia votes, if you are mafia. Like say the townie is winning by 7 votes, you switch 3 of the mafia votes to hide them, the difference is less significant, town is more confused. Just saying tho, I don't really care since it's just one night. Firstly, vote manipulation is always done by the mafia. In public it can be done easily. All the mafia has to do is make sure they either vote for other people or push a townie bandwagon. In private, they won't be able to predict who is going to be lynched. Secondly, if I'm mafia, you can examine the votes a wee bit more carefully. This way you'll have a better indication of who is mafia. See? Even if I'm mafia it's better for you!Thirdly, I'll accept someone to be the 'auditor' who also recieves votes
maybe its this post?
|
I thought all townies work together in mini-groups where a player knows of the other members in that group. Apparently, I might be wrong bleah =/
|
On December 14 2010 12:35 oddo123 wrote: I thought all townies work together in mini-groups where a player knows of the other members in that group. Apparently, I might be wrong bleah =/ This gave me a thought. Annul say that we can not name claim. But what if those who are in mini-groups group/house claim. Lets discuss if group claiming is a good choice.
|
On December 14 2010 12:39 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 12:35 oddo123 wrote: I thought all townies work together in mini-groups where a player knows of the other members in that group. Apparently, I might be wrong bleah =/ This gave me a thought. Annul say that we can not name claim. But what if those who are in mini-groups group/house claim. Lets discuss if group claiming is a good choice.
Yes because for scum to counter claim they'd have to have a group of 2 (or more) which is a huge risk. Counter claiming in general is dangerous anyway because even if they are successful that person will have to die the day after.
|
On December 14 2010 12:39 LunarDestiny wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 12:35 oddo123 wrote: I thought all townies work together in mini-groups where a player knows of the other members in that group. Apparently, I might be wrong bleah =/ This gave me a thought. Annul say that we can not name claim. But what if those who are in mini-groups group/house claim. Lets discuss if group claiming is a good choice.
Unity of the school houses? =O
|
The downside seems to be allowing mafia to kill townies that are confirmed to other townies (since people in these groups are nigh confirmed). As it is, LunarDestiny and Mr. Zergling are prime NK targets... On the other hand it would narrow the possible lynch targets by a lot, and potential clear a lot of people. And DT checks can check just one person in a group for the whole group to be confirmed...
In conclusion, I'm not sure.
|
On December 14 2010 12:48 zeks wrote:Show nested quote +On December 14 2010 12:39 LunarDestiny wrote:On December 14 2010 12:35 oddo123 wrote: I thought all townies work together in mini-groups where a player knows of the other members in that group. Apparently, I might be wrong bleah =/ This gave me a thought. Annul say that we can not name claim. But what if those who are in mini-groups group/house claim. Lets discuss if group claiming is a good choice. Yes because for scum to counter claim they'd have to have a group of 2 (or more) which is a huge risk. Counter claiming in general is dangerous anyway because even if they are successful that person will have to die the day after.
Well if we group claim, reds will be forced to counter claim, and if they fail, well to the gallows they go. However if we have successful counterclaims we might end up lynching town
|
|
|
|