And Then There Were None(RAM) - Page 8

On September 06 2010 04:28 Caller wrote:
News Flash
The night had hardly begun when a scream was heard in the distance. They found SouthRawrea, horribly mauled, lying on the ground wearing nothing but a pair of shorts. Upon further investigation it appeared he had suffocated from having something heavy on his chest.

On September 06 2010 06:53 Radfield wrote:



Clues? Clues.... 3 clues to go with 3 likely scum?

We need Chez to make sense of this. Or the dude who figured out all the mafia on Day 1 from the clues but no one listened to him.

On September 06 2010 07:58 ~OpZ~ wrote:
The problem with this game...Is Caller does nothing logically. Now. I challenge someone to put forth a better idea.

I'm not used to the days ending so soon, so I was kind of confused. And South died before the night was over? I'm guessing Capitalist Scum made a kill before the night was over. I would accuse Pandain of accusing our brother SouthRawea and poisoning him with his "tea." I would also accuse Pandain of homosexuality, and condemn him to a lifetime of Siberia! How do you feel Comrades? Does this course of action suit a man from Glorious Mother Russia!

Opinions my comrades. Your votes are hidden and so are your thoughts. Speak to your brother and let him know your thoughts.

On September 06 2010 08:38 Radfield wrote:
But what goes in a pair of pants? A BUM!

And what could crush the life out of a man? A large bum!

On September 06 2010 08:38 Radfield wrote:
But what goes in a pair of pants? A BUM!

And what could crush the life out of a man? A large bum!

On September 06 2010 11:23 rastaban wrote:


LOL!!!!

OK, well I just caught up. It is good that no one was killed day one, we can lynch as many people as needed during a lynch so we don't need to be in such a rush. This will also help us see what the capitalists are capable of.

I think we should be looking at a plan for tomorrow. I like the idea of requiring people to post there votes publicly and a reason with it. While the Capitalist Swine can lie about there votes, if someone dies when they shouldn't have we can then look through the votes and try and weed out the liar. The other thing we benefit from this is that if the Caps try and lie they must use week arguments since if they lie too well they will convince more people to the side they lied for defeating the purpose of lying.

I think the other thing we should look at doing is running this like a communist committee. My thought is that we do not allow people to forward there own accusations. Instead they will put for there logic, and ##Trial SouthRawea. This must then be quoted the actual accusation created. The reason for this is that it will keep the mafia from generating accusations without reason. And if they really are pushing someone then 2 of them must be exposed.

Now I know you will naturally think, But I love the privacy of my votes, and I like the freedom making my own accusations, but I sat NO! You are thinking as a capitalist, to succeed we must return to our communist roots. We serve the Motherland, and we must give up our individual desires for the good of the collective. You are innocent are you not, you have nothing to hide, only those who scheme in secret will have anything to worry about. What say you comrades? I say the security we gain is well worth the small amount of privacy lost.

On September 06 2010 11:25 rastaban wrote:

Here is an example, since I have placed him up for trial, then any one besides me would quote the post as I am doing and initiate the accusation. (He is dead and it is night so oibviously this is just a demo)
##Accuse SouthRawea

On September 06 2010 11:28 Divinek wrote:


i just dont see how we're going to differentiate the people that lie about their votes. It's really not hard to come up with solid reasoning to explain a vote on someone who is playing obviously suspicious. Not to mention the crux of this game

the caveat

On September 06 2010 11:23 rastaban wrote:


LOL!!!!

OK, well I just caught up. It is good that no one was killed day one, we can lynch as many people as needed during a lynch so we don't need to be in such a rush. This will also help us see what the capitalists are capable of.

I think we should be looking at a plan for tomorrow. I like the idea of requiring people to post there votes publicly and a reason with it. While the Capitalist Swine can lie about there votes, if someone dies when they shouldn't have we can then look through the votes and try and weed out the liar. The other thing we benefit from this is that if the Caps try and lie they must use week arguments since if they lie too well they will convince more people to the side they lied for defeating the purpose of lying.

I think the other thing we should look at doing is running this like a communist committee. My thought is that we do not allow people to forward there own accusations. Instead they will put for there logic, and ##Trial SouthRawea. This must then be quoted the actual accusation created. The reason for this is that it will keep the mafia from generating accusations without reason. And if they really are pushing someone then 2 of them must be exposed.

Now I know you will naturally think, But I love the privacy of my votes, and I like the freedom making my own accusations, but I sat NO! You are thinking as a capitalist, to succeed we must return to our communist roots. We serve the Motherland, and we must give up our individual desires for the good of the collective. You are innocent are you not, you have nothing to hide, only those who scheme in secret will have anything to worry about. What say you comrades? I say the security we gain is well worth the small amount of privacy lost.

On September 06 2010 11:37 rastaban wrote:


this may or may not be true, but we are at least forcing the mafia to lie. This has several implications as the game progresses.

1. While it may be difficult to tell, they still did lie and if we can find it then we have ourselves an enemy
2. Lying forces them to come up with reason that is the opposite of what they really think. This may cause them to convince people to the other side hurting there own cause.
3. We can see what lynches were close, even if no one lies, if the lynch comes down to a draw vote we can learn from the. If someone is not lynched by 1 vote it is a big difference from not being lynched by say 5. We learn nothing from the voting as it is now.
4, It makes us come up with legitimate reasons for our votes, and we will become less likely jump on the bandwagon if we have to have our own reason for the vote.
5. If someone lied and either the person who should have died was saved or the other way around, even if we don't learn the identity of the liar we do learn about the person being voted on. An innocent saved, may very well be a mafia buddy someone lied about there vote to keep alive. An innocent convicted means the mafia really wanted that person, perhaps over someone else or because they posed a threat.