Still, not enough to win a vote. Still plenty of time
TL Mafia XXVIII - Page 42
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
Still, not enough to win a vote. Still plenty of time | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Does anyone know when day is ending? Tomorrow at 12? So far the votes have been Divinek votes for BrownBear at 13:59 DarthThienAn votes Divinek at 13.59 tree.hugger votes Subversion at 14:03 DarthThienAn unvotes Divinek, votes BrownBear at 14:34 d3_crescentia votes DarthThienAn at 14:50 Amber[LighT] votes BrownBear at 22:15 bumatlarge votes DarthThienAn at 22:59 ~OpZ~ votes BrownBear at 1:01 rastaban votes BrownBear at 1:59 Misder votes DarthThienAn at 3:18 Tricode votes BrownBear at 4:02 Pyrrhuloxia votes DarthThienAn at 4:57 bumatlarge unvotes DarthThienAn, votes Subversion at 5:25 DarthThienAn unvotes BrownBear, votes Subversion at 5:30 NEW VOTES: chaoser votes Subversion at 6:02 BrownBear abstains at 6:52 Pandain votes chaoser at 6:53 Jayme votes Subversion at 8:20 youngminii votes chaoser at 8:32 chaoser unvotes, abstains at 9:25 LaXerCannon abstains at 9:27 SouthRawrea votes for chaoser at 11:19 chaoser votes for Subversion at 12:34 hmm, let's test something. this is either going to bite me in the ass or go very well for me ##vote Subversion End result: BrownBear - 5 (Divinek, Amber[LighT], ~OpZ~, rastaban, Tricode) Subversion - 5 (tree.hugger, DarthThienAn, bumatlarge, Jayme, chaoser) DarthThienAn - 3 (d3_crescentia, Misder, Pyrrhuloxia) chaoser - 3 (Pandain, youngminii, SouthRawrea) abstain - 2 (BrownBear, LaXerCannon) People yet to vote: xelin, SiNiquity, lakrismamma, Infundibulum, Subversion, BloodyC0bbler, Citi.zen, zeks, protactinium, roffles | ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On July 21 2010 13:01 chaoser wrote: + Show Spoiler + On July 21 2010 05:49 chaoser wrote: Does anyone know when day is ending? Tomorrow at 12? So far the votes have been Divinek votes for BrownBear at 13:59 DarthThienAn votes Divinek at 13.59 tree.hugger votes Subversion at 14:03 DarthThienAn unvotes Divinek, votes BrownBear at 14:34 d3_crescentia votes DarthThienAn at 14:50 Amber[LighT] votes BrownBear at 22:15 bumatlarge votes DarthThienAn at 22:59 ~OpZ~ votes BrownBear at 1:01 rastaban votes BrownBear at 1:59 Misder votes DarthThienAn at 3:18 Tricode votes BrownBear at 4:02 Pyrrhuloxia votes DarthThienAn at 4:57 bumatlarge unvotes DarthThienAn, votes Subversion at 5:25 DarthThienAn unvotes BrownBear, votes Subversion at 5:30 NEW VOTES: chaoser votes Subversion at 6:02 BrownBear abstains at 6:52 Pandain votes chaoser at 6:53 Jayme votes Subversion at 8:20 youngminii votes chaoser at 8:32 chaoser unvotes, abstains at 9:25 LaXerCannon abstains at 9:27 SouthRawrea votes for chaoser at 11:19 chaoser votes for Subversion at 12:34 hmm, let's test something. this is either going to bite me in the ass or go very well for me ##vote Subversion End result: BrownBear - 5 (Divinek, Amber[LighT], ~OpZ~, rastaban, Tricode) Subversion - 5 (tree.hugger, DarthThienAn, bumatlarge, Jayme, chaoser) DarthThienAn - 3 (d3_crescentia, Misder, Pyrrhuloxia) chaoser - 3 (Pandain, youngminii, SouthRawrea) abstain - 2 (BrownBear, LaXerCannon) People yet to vote: xelin, SiNiquity, lakrismamma, Infundibulum, Subversion, BloodyC0bbler, Citi.zen, zeks, protactinium, roffles Can't make up your mind eh? If you're testing something, might be good not to say you are. If you really do want to vote for Subversion, care to explain what led to the decision? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 21 2010 13:05 Pandain wrote: Can't make up your mind eh? If you're testing something, might be good not to say you are. If you really do want to vote for Subversion, care to explain what led to the decision? wait till the test results are in and I'll tell you =] | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
ill be back home shortly, im about to leave | ||
Pandain
United States12979 Posts
On July 21 2010 12:38 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: #vote for double lynch i'm not convinced about any of the lynch candidates so far, so i'll wait on that. Kind of curious about this. May you please explain why you are in favor of double lynching? I'm sure you have a reason, just asking. | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
Chaoser, you keep contradicting yourself, and I don't really buy your explanations... | ||
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
Right now, a little suspicious of chaoser, but not enough to vote for him yet. We'll see tomorrow if he posts more. | ||
SiNiquity
United States734 Posts
##Abstain for now, but it won't be there come lynching time. So much to sift through | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On July 21 2010 09:06 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Guys, these players haven't posted since Day 2 began: 7. xelin 10. lakrismamma 14. SouthRawrea 30. roffles Xelin and lakrismamma are still AWOL. Care to say anything, either of you? | ||
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
My Ph.D. Dissertation on DarthTheinAn by Pyrrhuloxia The Story Thus Far Day 1 Accusation + Show Spoiler + My thoughts: hyperbola is prolly just a quick trigger townie; I'd think a mafia would be too skittish to CONTINUE with it, especially when voting is so thin at this point. Mafia wouldn't have to be desperate as of now. Townie or red, hyperbola is obviously desperate now, with so many votes against him. But the desperation started and caused the bandwagon (according to Pandain). When the hyperbola bandwagon started, voting was evened out so there wouldn't be a need for mafia to bandwagon on someone. Mafia don't really tend to bandwagon anyone day one, at least they don't start the first bandwagon. They might start a second bandwagon to save someone's ass. Doesn't really help prove anyone innocent but I think hyperbola's behavior could be townie and the voting against him could be townie too. In better words, neither action really stick out at me as suspicious but no one's exonerated. Maybe if a team of people desperately work to save him there could be something going on. I'd like to hear why foolishness is so quiet this game. I've seen him in games as green and games as blue (DT). Both times he was really active and talkative and was somewhat of a leader with plans and so on. I've never seen him quiet and I've never seen him red. Could be an irl thing, could be something else. Darth...'s plan to "maximize" deaths on Day 1 strikes me as poor thinking. I get that it gets us information, so this could certainly be a townie sentiment. However, I've been red in many past games and I often got pissed off at how much harder it could be to win with just one more townie alive at the end, due to a non-lynch or something similar. At this point, my vote really is between Darth and hyperbola because it seems too late to rally the town anywhere else. Hyperbola strikes me as green running mouth. The reactions to that at least give the town something, even if he's red. Darth's hanging back and saying something that could be a subtle red move or a legitimate townie move. Yeah I double checked his other posts, and everything else is Darth clown spamming. As someone nicely put it: he's playing like Chezinu. So I can't be made to feel guilty about voting for him. Day 1 "Refutation" by the accused, wherein he admits he should be lynched, except not, because. + Show Spoiler + In my experience, mafia rarely actually "bandwagon". One or two might hop in for the final vote to kill someone they don't like over the current top target, but usually, they just vote wherever they feel like, based on their posting and what they've said in the past. The hyperbola bandwagon is just plain stupid imo. Anyone who was "convinced" by Siniquity's argument against hyperbola is also plain stupid. He gave poor reasoning for a random vote, but that does not make him mafia. A lot of the times, mafia play more like Siniquity, pointing out "mistakes" that townies make, and calling them scummy. My post was to contrast YellowInk's silly no lynch suggestion. Why are we even considering that? We need information. The game is about getting information for the town ASAP so that we can lynch/KP accurately. Therefore, we lynch a someone who is not already going to be modkilled. Pandain, I was only half-joking about it. Lynch someone who has voted but is not helping the town out. Someone like me, but, preferably, not me. And you're right, I was playing like Chezinu ^_^. He has inspired me. I might be out for the rest of today. Before you lynch me, consider how many other people have not posted, but have voted. For instance, d3, who is currently voting for me, but has said as little as I have said. Also, don't PM Opz, PM me!! ^^. Day 2 Accusation + Show Spoiler + On July 21 2010 03:18 Misder wrote: Foolishness's posts interest me a lot. I'm not sure if he was targeted because of his posts or because he was active, but we can look at his posts. (these posts are in backward order>.< sorry.) + Show Spoiler + On July 20 2010 09:31 Foolishness wrote: You'd have an easier time if you look at lakrismamma or citi.zen If the mafia did target Foolishness for his posts, it seems to point fingers at lakrismamma or citi.zen. We can't be positive, but we can be suspicious, especially since most of Foolishness' posts are targeting citi.zen + Show Spoiler + On July 20 2010 08:30 Foolishness wrote: This isn't about me. This is about you. I gave reason for my actions. Where's your reasons on why you're acting "like Chezinu"? Most people are blind so let me spell it out for everyone. You're hiding something. It's clear that you're attitude is the result of the fact you know some information that you don't want everyone else to know. That means you're blue or red. I'm sure I'm not the only one to figure this out, and if you're blue I bet a mafia member has figured this out. And if you don't have much to say/don't have the time to write it all out, go get yourself replaced. By the way, shoving arguments against me to try to divert attention off of yourself is terrible. You should know me well enough I'm just going to keep pressuring you until you claim or until I get 75% of the town to vote for you. If you want me off your back, all you got to do is point out how someone else is obviously mafia and you're not. I mean, all you had to do there was say "I'm not mafia, citizen is clearly mafia, look at his posts; clearly scum". And if you were somewhat serious about it I'd totally divert attention off of you since citizen is such an easy kill for the town. Here, we see Foolishness attack DTA. DTA has been acting very very weird, and I agree with Foolishness about DTA hiding something. The mafia may be scared of Foolishness because of his attacks on fellow mafia members. This points fingers to DTA. Also, Foolishness makes it clear that citi.zen is a target for lynching, and that DTA could have pointed fingers to him. + Show Spoiler + On July 20 2010 08:12 Foolishness wrote: I do appreciate you making it easy for all of us on who to vote for as soon as day starts. Mafia have probably sent in their hits already. Just claim now. The earlier the better. More assertiveness. Very scary for the mafia. + Show Spoiler + On July 20 2010 08:05 Foolishness wrote: You might as well just roleclaim whatever blue role you have to the town. I mean, if the mafia don't kill you tonight they are either stupid or you are in fact mafia. If you aren't dead after night then you should be top priority for lynch. Of course, you could just actually act normal and help us out to save you a bunch of trouble. More attacks on DTA. I feel that this is an important quote, considering that the mafia didn't target DTA this night. + Show Spoiler + On July 20 2010 08:02 Foolishness wrote: The ordered by player list doesn't help for anything. The only thing that's useful out of these lists is tracking the changes of who was ahead in the voting and how they got ahead. For instance, youngminii was ahead in votes at some point (I believe), looking at who were the people that pushed Hyperbola over is what's important. You also need the timestamps of when these votes happen, in order to confirm if there was a mafia pushover. It's been said before, mafia spread out their votes as much as possible. I wouldn't be surprised if there was only 1 mafia in the votes for youngminii and hyperbola combined. The only exception to this is if a mafia was about to be lynched, as the team would try to save that person. That's what we need to look out for. People already talked about this. That means we are on the right track. ##Vote: DarthThienAn because of his weird behavior and bring confusion. If he is a blue role or a townie, then he will need to defend himself in order to actually help the town. If he is a mafia, good. Let's not let this get lost in the shuffle. Red or confused green, I don't think BrownBear is much of a threat right now. From what I gather, DarthTheinAn is usually a pretty high profile player (won mayor two games ago). This game he is playing obstinate/quiet. When DTA was red mayor two games ago, "Darth was also an excellent mafia player, managing to sweep his way into office on day 1, but he did overstep his boundaries just a little bit on the last day, and his position as mayor actually worked against him as he was under intense scrutiny, which led to his downfall." Source for that is BrownBear, btw, so... take that into account however you will. But it seems to me if DTA was red this game he'd be trying to take a lower profile this time around. Some of this is [url=http://www.sirlin.net/articles/balancing-multiplayer-games-part-4-intuition.html]intuition, which I usually don't rely on, but BrownBear strikes me as town and reminds me of RedTooth in a game where I got him killed for similar behavior (I was red that game ). Meanwhile, DTA is clearly taking a low profile. From a player that is usually talkative, this usually means blue / red. I laid that on DTA day 1 and on Foolishness as well. Foolishness did make a bigger post towards the end of the day, but still seemed blue/red to me, and I imagine this was part of the hit reasoning (plus Foolishness is a good veteran player [whose first game was ran by me :D]). Now you may think that it is too obvious for the mafia to kill off someone who publicly calls them out. It's not. It's good strategy. In fact, I myself killed off Foolishness in a game I won because he was one of the few suspicious of me. If someone suspects you, they won't magically think you're innocent if you let them survive the night. People's heuristics for determining who they will vote for don't tend to shift too wildly over the course of a game. Even if people make a mistaken vote early, they will tend to justify it ex post facto and perhaps continue it (maybe what I'm doing here, but I think I have some good logic to back up my gut feeling). If you are mafia, and a member is getting 3rd/4th place in votes, even with just a couple, that member could be in 1st a few days later. By killing off the people who are suspicious of you, even if their reasons suck, you get talked about less and you literally shave off your vote total. It's not too bad of a strategy to just play whack-a-mole going after all your public detractors because you can always just say you're getting framed. I've been there, done that. I think Foolishness is right on that DTA would have been an obvious blue-snipe target. I'm not sure why D3crescentia might have been hit; he didn't stick out to me. I'm not familiar with him, though I've been out of the loop for a while and BC called him a top player. Finally, the Chezinu-style (constant trolling) play always strikes me as red. Maybe it's because I've been on multiple red teams with Chez, but, if you're trying to help the town, it usually pays to actually do so. ##Vote DarthTheinAn Also, the case against Subversion seems really good to me, too. I'm voting DTA first because DTA already has votes against him and DTA would seem to be the better brain to pluck from the Mafia Think Tank if they are indeed both red. ---------- Wine In Front Of Me: An Informative Chat With Infundibulum: On July 21 2010 09:40 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Good point Pandain, i didn't remember that a couple of them said they'd be gone. Still, we can't let people slip under like this. The voting was extremely close, actually. It was 5-5 when he voted for Hyper, though he says he thought it was 7-4, and to be fair this is possible since there were mistakes in the vote tally and they weren't counted often. It's Subversions reactions that make me think he might be town who screwed up and is now in over his head. Well if you look back around page 27 or so, DTA basically goes all out on Foolishness quoting all of his posts, asking "are you so innocent yourself?" And then Foolishness gets killed by the mafia at night. I know that this is a bit of wifom, but i find it hard to think that a red would put himself out like that starting a feud with someone he was targeting. As you say yourself, it is wifom. I know from empirical experience that a red can do that because I've done it myself to great effect. What is not wifom is that the mafia benefits from killing off someone who currently had their vote aimed at a mafia member. The mafia can get away with killing people like that because when confronted about it, they can kick up that exact cloud of wifom that you described. Here's another way to think about it: The Mafia are trying to hurt the town as fast as possible by killing the best players. While we aren't in a position to tell who is doing well in a particular game, the mafia are. Certainly, the mafia can make a gambit and try to "frame" people by killing their prominent accusers. But, that's called a gambit because it is suboptimal play. Killing someone against you automatically means one less vote against you tomorrow. It means a chance of spurring new voters, but in practice I doubt it counteracts the benefits. This might not be too far from wifom, but I like the odds better than BB or Sub. It certainly can't be relied upon since it can easily be abused, but mafias that let their biggest critics survive will usually regret it. So it can't be abused in an infinite loop like wifom. Anyway, certainly its not an argument that could stand by its lonesome, but if you keep reading you will see that it is only one small part of a balanced breakfast. Additionally, don't forget that Foolishness voted for BloodyC0bbler as well, who seems less active than usual as well. ---------- The Ol' Switcheroo Already today, DarthTheinAn has changed his vote from Divinek to BrownBear to Subversion. I didn't even notice this due to how slippery DTA has been. Only two other players have unvoted once today, and DTA has unvoted twice. Seems like an awful finicky for how little we seem to have to go on. Day 1 he went: abstain>d3>abstain>amber[light]. I dunno what the fuck he's doing, other than not try to find and kill mafia with the rest of the town. If he's planning on getting serious at some point in this game and giving an explanation for all this sketchy shit, I adamantly suggest he reads this and does so at his earliest convenience. The Divinek vote was never explained. The BrownBear vote isn't really explained, just attached to a quote of BrownBear promising to be more active. He switches his vote to Subversion with some sarcastic joke, but does follow it up with an explanation mentioning the weird statement Sub made. This would probably be his most helpful post, except that this had already been pointed out by tree.hugger, protactinium, chaoser, and BloodyC0bbler. He seems more interested in having his vote end up in the right place then illuminating the rest of the town so that all of our votes can end up in the right place. It's Day 2 and he's already voted for at least 5 people, at least 7 if you count abstaining. And he even nice enough to let us in on his thinking for one of those votes. He's being less than useless at absolute best. If you're wondering why Bill Murray can't get a single vote count right, it's probably the frantic engagement sex. But this certainly can't help. ----------- Public Enemies No. 1 and 2 On Subversion, frankly, I think Citizen put it well: "I don't know... I am leaning with Pandain here. Subversion is a brand new player who does not know what to expect in these games. I can see him think... "How do you catch mafia? You watch for mistakes! Have we caught any? Nope. Ah - so thus far they aren't making too many mistakes." I see no huge red flag. That said, he does not strike me as someone useful for the town so I am OK losing him if there are no better candidates." It totally agree; I just think DTA is a better candidate. As for BrownBear, the entire case seems to be based on bandwagoning which is basically guaranteed to happen day 1, whether or not the mafia are involved at all. Tricode's reason for voting BB was his inactivity - he ought to be voting for one of the two people I mentioned above who've yet to say a thing today (Xelin and lakrismamma). No one has for Brown Bear for a while since Subversion became the flavor of the moment. Poor BB went out of style faster than shutter shades. ---------- But, but, but... Now maybe you are worried that DTA is blue, that he's trying to stay under the radar. I did describe his play this way earlier, but laying low was perhaps not the best way to describe it, and anyway he has become more active. Sometimes he lashes out at attackers; but, mostly, he ignores them and tries to get attention as the class clown rather than the suspect on trial. Foolishness had it pegged: "You might as well just roleclaim whatever blue role you have to the town. I mean, if the mafia don't kill you tonight they are either stupid or you are in fact mafia. If you aren't dead after night then you should be top priority for lynch." Acting weird is not a get-out-of-all-suspicion-free-card, because the weirdo might be a blue. Quite the opposite. But even yesterday he wasn't hiding; he responded to Foolishness's suspicion by turning it right back on Foolishness. He asserted that his goofing around was as valuable to the town as Foolishness's voting behavior analysis. I've noticed that DTA stays out of the discussions/town consciousness merely by refusing to defend himself. He doesn't attempt to use logic so no one chimes in to point out trivial inconsistencies in speech or vote counts with timelines more complicated than Zelda's. Meanwhile, BrownBear and Subversion are both bleating like goats on a sacrificial altar, desperate to defend themselves, so everyone focuses on them, even though half the town is complaining, wishing we had better suspects. We have one if you shake off the smoke and mirrors. Logic is the town's best defense. Midser and I both laid out very logical cases against DTA. DTA never responds to them: instead, he pulls a classic strawman. He quotes bumatlarge's convoluted and seemingly vacuous reason for voting DTA, and he quotes Zeks's reason which is merely that DTA is acting differently this game, which is just a small part, maybe 10% of the overall case. And EVEN THEN he doesn't answer these poor arguments - he makes a wisecrack for each and calls it good. And the town glazes over it, immediately returning to the regularly scheduled program: arguing about tweedledee vs. tweedledum. The bottom line is that this behavior allows DTA to set up a situation where he is never accountable for his behavior because he can just say he was fucking around. Don't believe me? He said he wanted to maximize deaths on the first day, and no one cared because he was "silly" but also "only half-joking." When Subversion says that the mafia aren't making many mistakes, the shit hits the fan. But with DTA, nothing can stick to him. Coupled with the fact that he refuses to acknowledge legitimate arguments, he is the absolute embodiment of the greased up deaf guy. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY / THE THREATDOWN / TLDR CENTRAL DarthTheinAn 1. Never defends himself with logic 2. Responded to Foolishness with a distorted counter attack and no refutation. 3. Blatantly ignores legitimate criticism to snark at strawmen instead. 4. Talks often, but without contributing anything new and useful. 5. Changes his vote often, usually without explanation. 6. Constantly "pretends" to be mafia. No red would ever be so daring! 7. Doesn't do shit all else. 8. Is supposedly capable of much better than this. Finally, I wouldn't be surprised if he was the Godfather. He won mayor in his last game and could certainly win a GF spot. His weird, cryptic actions are complete role check bait and he's been begging people to PM him. Let's off him before one of our confused nubile blues gets molested. | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
4] Subversion (tree.hugger, bumatlarge, darththienan, jayme) 4] Brownbear (Divinek, amber[LighT], tricode, ~opz~) 3] DarthThienAn (d3_crescentia, misder, Pyrrhuloxia) 2] chaoser (pandain, youngminii) 3] Abstain (brownbear, chaoser, SiNiquity) Not Voting and in risk of modkill: (iNfuNdiBuLuM, XeliN, lakrismamma, rastaban, SouthRawrea, Subversion, LaxerCannon, BloodyC0bbler, Citi.zen, Pyrrholuxia, zeks, protactinium, Roffles) double lynch] iNfuNdiBuLuM Day ends in 17 hours and 15 minutes. | ||
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Out of the two candidates my inclination is for either Darth or Chaoser, the arguments against Subversion have seemed quite astute but quite frankly the actions of Darth and Chaoser so far concern me more, Darth from my past experience is extremely logical, helpful and influential. He has been none of these things this game and in the past I have only seen him in a town role. This shift in character//style would be the main reason I suspect Darth. Chaoser has been exceptionally inconsistent so far, Pandain has outlined most of my reasoning quite well on page 39, but to surmise his arguing against "no-lynching" in order to criticise a player then abstaining, using the argument "these two players are more suspicious//more evidence against them than me". This line of argument is almost laughable and reminds me of the playground type reaction "Hey don't pick on me... look at that kid... he can't even play football and he's ugly as hell". ##Vote DarthThienAn Out of Chaoser and Darth I would consider the latter more dangerous in a mafia role so I'll place it there. | ||
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Didn't particularly want to post for the sake of posting. | ||
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
On July 20 2010 23:58 zeks wrote: i'm more inclined to believe d3 is town from a medic claim than a vet claim if he false claims medic protection, medics would know whats up immediately. if he claims vet there could be the slight possibility of: mafia sends in 1 hit, d3 claims vet tricks us all into thinking he got hit and infiltrates town circles. regardless i'll give him the benefit of the doubt that mafia didn't pull off what i said above. ##Vote DarthThienAn You're playing way out of your normal character, and you're no Bill Murray. Either you're scum or trying too hard to not get hit by being abnoxious. Since I didn't bold and my vote didn't count: ##Vote DarthThienAn | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
I liked most of it except the continued suspicion on me You didn't really make any mention of my numerous posts in my defense? Did you read them, or did you just kinda think they were BS? Anyway, you've definitely swayed me towards Darth. Gonna vote for him so long, and change the vote should someone else seem like a better target. ##Vote DarthThienAn | ||
| ||