EPTEdit: Since it does not follow the banlist, you can actually sign up for that game if you are interested (if DrH lets you).
TL Mafia Ban List - Page 162
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
phagga
Switzerland2194 Posts
Edit: Since it does not follow the banlist, you can actually sign up for that game if you are interested (if DrH lets you). | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On March 18 2013 22:37 raynpelikoneet wrote: /sitout Newbie Mini Mafia XXXIX This is your fourth, and since a.) Its been a year and a half b.) You've been a good sport about it, well behaved at the time of your ban, and sat out three games c.) It was I who banned you at my own request, and in retrospect I feel like I was excessively harsh I'm going to go ahead an remove the rest of your sentence, you're free to play again. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On March 13 2013 08:06 GreYMisT wrote: Bans for TL Mafia LX: Toadesstern: 2 game ban for communicating with a player regarding the game privatly, and then using that information to influence the game Hassybaby: 2 game ban, same as above, except with the addition of inactivity. Approved, except Toad want me to permaban him from TL Mafia for personal reasons, so he's on the "indefinite ban list" until he PMs me, at which time he'll still have two bans to sit out. Honestly I'd probably drop hassy to 1 ban, since leaks happen and hassy deliberately tried to avoid benefiting from it. The issue isn't that a leak happened, we're a community and talk a lot, play together, etc, leaks *happen*, what matters is how they are handled, the correct response is to immediately take it to the host and not post anything even tangentially related (or really at all) until the host solves the issue. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
On March 18 2013 23:02 GMarshal wrote: This is your fourth, and since a.) Its been a year and a half b.) You've been a good sport about it, well behaved at the time of your ban, and sat out three games c.) It was I who banned you at my own request, and in retrospect I feel like I was excessively harsh I'm going to go ahead an remove the rest of your sentence, you're free to play again. You mean now or after this game? Anyways thank you! | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On March 18 2013 23:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: You mean now or after this game? Anyways thank you! At this point the ban is lifted, you can play as of right now, you don't have to sit out NMM XXXIX | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43270 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On March 18 2013 23:09 GMarshal wrote: Approved, except Toad want me to permaban him from TL Mafia for personal reasons, so he's on the "indefinite ban list" until he PMs me, at which time he'll still have two bans to sit out. Honestly I'd probably drop hassy to 1 ban, since leaks happen and hassy deliberately tried to avoid benefiting from it. The issue isn't that a leak happened, we're a community and talk a lot, play together, etc, leaks *happen*, what matters is how they are handled, the correct response is to immediately take it to the host and not post anything even tangentially related (or really at all) until the host solves the issue. This is acceptible | ||
|
layabout
United Kingdom2600 Posts
 | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18438 Posts
PS. I share the sentiment: Toad!! Oh, did some thinking about the NMM 38 bans. I request no bans. I think VE's wife Matriarch tried the game and didn't really like it, so no point putting her on the ban list. ChewOnStu messaged me to replace him for personal reasons. He was playing fine before that and I shit happens. So requesting nothing. | ||
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On March 21 2013 03:52 geript wrote: I know that this may be a little late, but the craziness in The Game reminded me of this. Could Grush please get a warning for the fake ##Shoot Chezinu. In all fairness, I think I should get a warning for spamming, being a douche, threatening to play against win-con in the future, and not playing towards win-con. If the host didn't request a warning there shouldn't be one imo. Like, I personally am not a huge Grush fan but the fake ##shoot wasn't like something super weird. He just wrote ##shoot in bold in the thread-- it was a fake claim, and I don't think there were any rules against it in the OP. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On March 21 2013 03:52 geript wrote: I know that this may be a little late, but the craziness in The Game reminded me of this. Could Grush please get a warning for the fake ##Shoot Chezinu. In all fairness, I think I should get a warning for spamming, being a douche, threatening to play against win-con in the future, and not playing towards win-con. That is actually a very common strategy and has been done multiple times on TL. It's not against any rules nor is it considered to be unfair at all. A variation of it, without actually typing out "shoot" yourself, is actually popular enough to have it's own name "The Palmar" because it happened 3 times I think and it always was palmar who did it :p Here's "the palmar" step by step explained + Show Spoiler [The Palmar] +
True story btw :p TL;dr: What he did is perfectly fine if everything he did is fake a dayvig by typing ##shoot. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I agree that it's not against the rules to fake actions in the thread. Who cares? It's not relevant until the host does something about it anyway, so why do you care if they do it? | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
On March 21 2013 03:52 geript wrote: I know that this may be a little late, but the craziness in The Game reminded me of this. Could Grush please get a warning for the fake ##Shoot Chezinu. In all fairness, I think I should get a warning for spamming, being a douche, threatening to play against win-con in the future, and not playing towards win-con. There is no reason for a rule against typing ##Shoot in the thread. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On March 21 2013 03:52 geript wrote: I know that this may be a little late, but the craziness in The Game reminded me of this. Could Grush please get a warning for the fake ##Shoot Chezinu. In all fairness, I think I should get a warning for spamming, being a douche, threatening to play against win-con in the future, and not playing towards win-con. 1.) Only hosts can request bans for their specific games for the most part. 2.) There is no rule against typing false commands in the thread, unless specified by the host. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
| ||
