|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On May 08 2015 12:18 MoonBear wrote:
Ziv is amazing
You jinxed him, Lulubear.
|
On May 08 2015 12:15 oneofthem wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2015 12:13 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:08 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:05 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:03 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:59 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 11:49 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:48 Gahlo wrote:
[quote]
Don't see what that has to do with their head to head matchup. ? tsm will lose to edg+ skt and not make it if they lose to ahq You're missing the point. How does hypothetically playing TSM today make any difference than playing them tomorrow? i don't see how your post made this point. it's because tsm relies on preparation. Depending on how much time they put into Kebab, which didn't look like much, they'd have 1 game of time to work out kinks and then 4-5 games worth of time(of which AHQ will be playing 2 of) to prepare for them. That's plenty of time for a Bo1. As a note: TSM prepped for SKT in Semis of IEM and got YoE and still won on less turnaround. skt wasn't at iem. you've already moved to the argument of 'they'd prepare enough' and conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation so i dont want to continue this anymore. they would have more information about AHQ with more games played. I never said this anywhere, don't put words into my mouth and then say you're running from the debate. I typo'd SK as SKT because my mind is on MSI. whatever lol seems you understood my original point fine instead of talking about something completely irrelevant. i dont need you to agree with me. Yeah, I understand your position, but I'm not adding stuff to it. Unfortunately, can't say the same about you. i was just taken aback by this post of yours. still dont understand your thought process
That was because you didn't clearly make your point about it being about preparation. I refuted them needing that much time because they beat YoE with less time in a longer set and you asserted that as "conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation" which isn't the case.
Btw, I didn't move the debate to being about preparation, it was your position the entire time.
|
Betting line now
SKT -304
TSM +220
SKT is actually a bigger fav vs FNC, -322/+238
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On May 08 2015 12:20 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2015 12:15 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:13 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:08 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:05 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:03 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:59 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 11:49 oneofthem wrote:
[quote]
? tsm will lose to edg+ skt and not make it if they lose to ahq You're missing the point. How does hypothetically playing TSM today make any difference than playing them tomorrow? i don't see how your post made this point. it's because tsm relies on preparation. Depending on how much time they put into Kebab, which didn't look like much, they'd have 1 game of time to work out kinks and then 4-5 games worth of time(of which AHQ will be playing 2 of) to prepare for them. That's plenty of time for a Bo1. As a note: TSM prepped for SKT in Semis of IEM and got YoE and still won on less turnaround. skt wasn't at iem. you've already moved to the argument of 'they'd prepare enough' and conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation so i dont want to continue this anymore. they would have more information about AHQ with more games played. I never said this anywhere, don't put words into my mouth and then say you're running from the debate. I typo'd SK as SKT because my mind is on MSI. whatever lol seems you understood my original point fine instead of talking about something completely irrelevant. i dont need you to agree with me. Yeah, I understand your position, but I'm not adding stuff to it. Unfortunately, can't say the same about you. i was just taken aback by this post of yours. still dont understand your thought process
Right, because AHQ is more likely to beat TSM than SKT.
That was because you didn't clearly make your point about it being about preparation. I refuted them needing that much time because they beat YoE with less time in a longer set and you asserted that as "conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation" which isn't the case. Btw, I didn't move the debate to being about preparation, it was your position the entire time.
that wasn't the move.
|
On May 08 2015 11:50 HyperST wrote:
Quote me on this, TSM will beat SKT.
So yeah, you wanted to be quoted on this, but nothing more than words?
On May 08 2015 11:51 Faeny wrote:I haven't jumped in a banbet yet, name a duration.
|
United Kingdom9872 Posts
How do betting lines work? I normally just see things like 4/1 on betting sites.
|
|
|
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On May 08 2015 12:24 Ansibled wrote:
How do betting lines work? I normally just see things like 4/1 on betting sites.
It's American system, slightly different.
|
On May 08 2015 12:23 oneofthem wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2015 12:20 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:15 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:13 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:08 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:05 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:03 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:59 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 Gahlo wrote:
[quote]
You're missing the point. How does hypothetically playing TSM today make any difference than playing them tomorrow? i don't see how your post made this point. it's because tsm relies on preparation. Depending on how much time they put into Kebab, which didn't look like much, they'd have 1 game of time to work out kinks and then 4-5 games worth of time(of which AHQ will be playing 2 of) to prepare for them. That's plenty of time for a Bo1. As a note: TSM prepped for SKT in Semis of IEM and got YoE and still won on less turnaround. skt wasn't at iem. you've already moved to the argument of 'they'd prepare enough' and conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation so i dont want to continue this anymore. they would have more information about AHQ with more games played. I never said this anywhere, don't put words into my mouth and then say you're running from the debate. I typo'd SK as SKT because my mind is on MSI. whatever lol seems you understood my original point fine instead of talking about something completely irrelevant. i dont need you to agree with me. Yeah, I understand your position, but I'm not adding stuff to it. Unfortunately, can't say the same about you. i was just taken aback by this post of yours. still dont understand your thought process
Right, because AHQ is more likely to beat TSM than SKT.
That was because you didn't clearly make your point about it being about preparation. I refuted them needing that much time because they beat YoE with less time in a longer set and you asserted that as "conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation" which isn't the case. Btw, I didn't move the debate to being about preparation, it was your position the entire time. that wasn't the move.
lol
|
On May 08 2015 12:24 Ansibled wrote:
How do betting lines work? I normally just see things like 4/1 on betting sites.
-XX means you pay that much to win $100.
+XX means you win that much from a $100 bet.
|
On May 08 2015 12:24 Ansibled wrote:
How do betting lines work? I normally just see things like 4/1 on betting sites.
-304 SKT - Bet 304 to win 100
+225 TSM - Bet 100 to win 225
|
Production: quick, put TSM on screen, we're losing people
|
United Kingdom9872 Posts
On May 08 2015 12:27 cLutZ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2015 12:24 Ansibled wrote:
How do betting lines work? I normally just see things like 4/1 on betting sites. -XX means you pay that much to win $100. +XX means you win that much from a $100 bet.
Oh ok I see, I prefer it as decimal/fraction odds it looks less weird.
|
Bet your savings, win 3x, go off into the sunset chanting TSM.
|
On May 08 2015 12:24 Ansibled wrote:
How do betting lines work? I normally just see things like 4/1 on betting sites.
Its
The +220 for TSM means that a bet on TSM would pay 2.2 to 1. The -304 for SKT means that if you bet them, then you have to lay 3.04 to 1.
Examples:
A $100 on TSM would win $220.
A $304 bet on SKT would win $100.
SKT was initially -243 when lines were first posted but now over a 3-1 fav
|
|
|
ROFL WESTDOOR
PLEASE PUT YOUR CLOTHES BACK ON
|
westdoor being exposed so hard in this lategame.
|
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
On May 08 2015 12:27 Gahlo wrote:Show nested quote +On May 08 2015 12:23 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:20 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:15 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:13 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:08 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 12:05 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 12:03 oneofthem wrote:On May 08 2015 11:59 Gahlo wrote:On May 08 2015 11:52 oneofthem wrote:
[quote]
i don't see how your post made this point. it's because tsm relies on preparation. Depending on how much time they put into Kebab, which didn't look like much, they'd have 1 game of time to work out kinks and then 4-5 games worth of time(of which AHQ will be playing 2 of) to prepare for them. That's plenty of time for a Bo1. As a note: TSM prepped for SKT in Semis of IEM and got YoE and still won on less turnaround. skt wasn't at iem. you've already moved to the argument of 'they'd prepare enough' and conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation so i dont want to continue this anymore. they would have more information about AHQ with more games played. I never said this anywhere, don't put words into my mouth and then say you're running from the debate. I typo'd SK as SKT because my mind is on MSI. whatever lol seems you understood my original point fine instead of talking about something completely irrelevant. i dont need you to agree with me. Yeah, I understand your position, but I'm not adding stuff to it. Unfortunately, can't say the same about you. i was just taken aback by this post of yours. still dont understand your thought process
Right, because AHQ is more likely to beat TSM than SKT.
That was because you didn't clearly make your point about it being about preparation. I refuted them needing that much time because they beat YoE with less time in a longer set and you asserted that as "conceded that they would have a better chance with more preparation" which isn't the case. Btw, I didn't move the debate to being about preparation, it was your position the entire time. that wasn't the move. lol
my point was about more preparation not really prepared enough. i'm fine with leaving whether tsm would win vs ahq up in the air but they would stand a better chance if they see the ahq global cheese more.
|
Lol this westdoor TF, gold card spellshield, then a minion. Scary ass S2 TF incoming
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
