• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:06
CEST 00:06
KST 07:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway13
Community News
SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon What happened to Singapore/Brazil servers?
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams
Tourneys
[IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! Is there English video for group selection for ASL [ASL20] Ro16 Group B [ASL20] Ro16 Group A
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Canadian Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1210 users

qxc's thoughts: Disruptor in Review - Page 2

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
62 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24209 Posts
June 17 2015 19:34 GMT
#21
You nearly convinced me the disruptor was interesting. I still think the colossus should either be removed from the game or made into something useful again.
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
569 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-06-17 19:41:17
June 17 2015 19:41 GMT
#22
The disruptor just needs to be less binary. There are plenty of ways to do this like lowering the cost and damage (so you have more disruptors that individually do less) or changing the mechanic to a DoT.

The fundamental design is sound, IMO.
Magnifico
Profile Joined March 2013
1958 Posts
June 17 2015 20:05 GMT
#23
On June 18 2015 04:41 Athenau wrote:
The disruptor just needs to be less binary


David Kim said that this particular problem is being addressed internally at the moment.


From my very personal perspective, the disruptor is just too difficult to use. I have 130 apm, ok micro for my level, and I'm having a really hard time microing this unit properly. It's by far the hardest protoss unit to play with.
JCoto
Profile Joined October 2014
Spain574 Posts
June 17 2015 20:17 GMT
#24
On June 18 2015 04:34 [PkF] Wire wrote:
You nearly convinced me the disruptor was interesting. I still think the colossus should either be removed from the game or made into something useful again.


I think Colossus should be changed from generic splash unit to a concentrated splash damage.
So instead of two beams doing two full swipes, the two beams colliding over one unit, in the middle, with slower animation
Then the damage and cooldown moved back to the initial WoL levels, feeling like a more "siege" unit. We have enough "anti-minions" (minor units) splash.

A colossus like that will be optimized for tactical focus firing a bit more than the actual ones, but at the same time weaker vs splits. I can't concieve a colossus that is not able to 1 shot Zerglings at +3.
Beelzebub1
Profile Joined May 2015
1004 Posts
June 17 2015 20:25 GMT
#25
On June 18 2015 04:34 [PkF] Wire wrote:
You nearly convinced me the disruptor was interesting. I still think the colossus should either be removed from the game or made into something useful again.


The Colossus should be removed, it's a garbage no skill unit that has no place in the higher skill cap LOTV.

I am kind of a critic of the binary "all or nothing" approach with Purification Nova but the Warp Prism drop thing does add a hefty lair of micro management and skill cap potential which is so desperately what Protoss needs as a race (i.e. Protoss needs a unit that in the hands of Parting it looks completely different then a high masters player which is where the Colossus falls on it's damn face design wise)

Disruptor needs a tweak, I think it should cost a bit less, do a bit less damage so it's not broken against immobile units like the Lurker and Siege Tank, but have a more reliable escape mechanism.

Perhaps still have invulnerability when PN is activated, but movement speed remains the same until the blast goes off, as soon as the blast goes off, the speed boost applies, that way armies have more of a chance to dodge but the unit itself has a greater chance to escape with good control.

I don't know, the unit is a step or two away from being the unit that Protoss deserves, but the lack of escape without Warp Prism is the biggest thing holding it back.
Lunareste
Profile Joined July 2011
United States3596 Posts
June 17 2015 20:39 GMT
#26
On June 18 2015 05:25 Beelzebub1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2015 04:34 [PkF] Wire wrote:
You nearly convinced me the disruptor was interesting. I still think the colossus should either be removed from the game or made into something useful again.


The Colossus should be removed, it's a garbage no skill unit that has no place in the higher skill cap LOTV.

I am kind of a critic of the binary "all or nothing" approach with Purification Nova but the Warp Prism drop thing does add a hefty lair of micro management and skill cap potential which is so desperately what Protoss needs as a race (i.e. Protoss needs a unit that in the hands of Parting it looks completely different then a high masters player which is where the Colossus falls on it's damn face design wise)

Disruptor needs a tweak, I think it should cost a bit less, do a bit less damage so it's not broken against immobile units like the Lurker and Siege Tank, but have a more reliable escape mechanism.

Perhaps still have invulnerability when PN is activated, but movement speed remains the same until the blast goes off, as soon as the blast goes off, the speed boost applies, that way armies have more of a chance to dodge but the unit itself has a greater chance to escape with good control.

I don't know, the unit is a step or two away from being the unit that Protoss deserves, but the lack of escape without Warp Prism is the biggest thing holding it back.


Being able to look like a different unit in the hands of Parting is exactly why the support via Warp Prism makes this exactly the unit Protoss has needed.

I mean are we gonna nerf Banelings/Widow Mine splash at this point too? Why shouldn't this unit do a shitload of damage when you don't micro against it?

We need to stop being pussies and get better, instead of whining when shit gets hard. That's exactly why SC2 is in the boring state it's in. I want things to be AWESOME, not boring.
KT FlaSh FOREVER
vayuu
Profile Joined May 2012
Canada66 Posts
June 17 2015 21:10 GMT
#27
too strong against zerg, too useless against a terran paying attention. needs to be somewhere in between
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2648 Posts
June 17 2015 21:19 GMT
#28
I find the lack of analysis against mech bad.

The disruptor is too good against ground mech, hellbats and thors are too slow, and you will never have enough medivacs to lift up your tanks.

The biggest problem of course besides the all-or-nothing nature of the disruptor is the need for mech to stay together so much, since positional play is so weak you either have all your army together and lose because is one tight ball, or you spread it and then you lose because tanks are shit.

But right now its hard to say if the problem is with mech, with the disruptor or with something else, so it requires more analysis.
StarStruck
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
25339 Posts
June 17 2015 21:22 GMT
#29
On June 18 2015 03:03 prplhz wrote:
from the description this sounds a lot like the reaver


I was thinking the same thing and notice how you can never attack scarabs. hm!

Reebus re-branded.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
June 17 2015 21:24 GMT
#30
I'll repeat my questions from the earlier thread, for which I'm curious about the answers.

1. why is the disruptor so expensive?
2. why not a damage gradient?
3. why doesn't at least forcefield block it?

Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24209 Posts
June 17 2015 22:20 GMT
#31
On June 18 2015 06:24 Grumbels wrote:
3. why doesn't at least forcefield block it?

A question that leaves me mesmerized too. Same for adepts shades by the way. I just don't understand ; those two simple changes would make PvP a thousand times better.
ejozl
Profile Joined October 2010
Denmark3408 Posts
June 18 2015 00:17 GMT
#32
On June 18 2015 07:20 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2015 06:24 Grumbels wrote:
3. why doesn't at least forcefield block it?

A question that leaves me mesmerized too. Same for adepts shades by the way. I just don't understand ; those two simple changes would make PvP a thousand times better.

I'm glad they don't, because using these units together with Forcefields kind of blows my mind in my little realm of possible tactics you can pull off as a Protoss player.
SC2 Archon needs "Terrible, terrible damage" as one of it's quotes.
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
June 18 2015 00:21 GMT
#33
On June 18 2015 06:24 Grumbels wrote:
I'll repeat my questions from the earlier thread, for which I'm curious about the answers.

1. why is the disruptor so expensive?
2. why not a damage gradient?
3. why doesn't at least forcefield block it?


1. 2. I think these 2 points go hand in hand, the disruptor is a unit that has to have a good burst efficiency to warrant its cost (or vice versa :D). And I honestly think damage gradients on AoE zones (which are already quite small) are always underwhelming. It's good that you can one-shot most small units no matter where they are in the disruptor's AoE. For example, if you didn't one-shot marines in the whole area, you would end up with a useless unit in cooldown and still a lot of DPS left on the other side after your release, it would deincentivize micro for the defensive player.
3. Good point, I didn't even know it didn't work haha.
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
June 18 2015 02:20 GMT
#34
I like the article and I like the Disruptor.

I dislike the invulnerability on principle. It should not be capable of running into a 200/200 clump of Marines or Zerglings, doing its thing, and then getting away. Nothing should. Just give it a flat armor boost that is sufficient when the Protoss engages cost-effectively (whatever that is judged to be - one Disruptor versus 15 Marines? 20? I don't care), but not sufficient if the engagement is less cost-effective than that, and the Disruptor may die before its attack even activates.

I don't for the life of me understand how Blizzard didn't arrive at this conclusion themselves. There is literally no difference when the Protoss takes reasonable engagements, but bad engagements are appropriately punished as opposed to providing a sliver of a chance to a player who deserves none, and mech's high single-target damage can bypass the armor boost and deal with the Disruptor.

This is just an obviously superior way to design the unit.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
June 18 2015 02:45 GMT
#35
On June 18 2015 11:20 pure.Wasted wrote:
I like the article and I like the Disruptor.

I dislike the invulnerability on principle. It should not be capable of running into a 200/200 clump of Marines or Zerglings, doing its thing, and then getting away. Nothing should. Just give it a flat armor boost that is sufficient when the Protoss engages cost-effectively (whatever that is judged to be - one Disruptor versus 15 Marines? 20? I don't care), but not sufficient if the engagement is less cost-effective than that, and the Disruptor may die before its attack even activates.

I don't for the life of me understand how Blizzard didn't arrive at this conclusion themselves. There is literally no difference when the Protoss takes reasonable engagements, but bad engagements are appropriately punished as opposed to providing a sliver of a chance to a player who deserves none, and mech's high single-target damage can bypass the armor boost and deal with the Disruptor.

This is just an obviously superior way to design the unit.

This would be a good idea to test, especially while in beta, because if it does work out as you suggest then it would obviously be superior.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
MoonyD
Profile Joined December 2013
Australia191 Posts
June 18 2015 03:25 GMT
#36
As it stands the Disruptor is pretty much an useless unit in the PvT matchup. The fact terran can just load up everything and take 0 damage makes it super easy to dodge it. I think the Disruptor should do at least a bit of damage versus air. I mean if Protoss goes into Disruptors and Zerg goes for mass mutas, it becomes almost impossible for Protoss to defend their bases after investing so much into what is 'useless tech' vs air.

I agree with previous comments about the fact that forcefields should at least block adepts. It seems silly that the shade can move past forcefields on the ramp. If disruptors can go through forcefields they should at least break them the same way as it does with a colossus going through forcefields. Going through forcefields is just silly.
The world wants to be deceived
pure.Wasted
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada4701 Posts
June 18 2015 03:38 GMT
#37
On June 18 2015 12:25 MoonyD wrote:
As it stands the Disruptor is pretty much an useless unit in the PvT matchup. The fact terran can just load up everything and take 0 damage makes it super easy to dodge it. I think the Disruptor should do at least a bit of damage versus air. I mean if Protoss goes into Disruptors and Zerg goes for mass mutas, it becomes almost impossible for Protoss to defend their bases after investing so much into what is 'useless tech' vs air.


I'm not going to touch PvZ because I know nothing about it, but why can't Stalkers shoot the Medivacs out of the air once the Terran attempts to GTFO? Get your Stalkers ready for a flank, bring in the Disruptor, and then blink under the Medivacs and pick a couple of them off for free.

There might be a good reason why this isn't possible, I'm genuinely curious.
INna Maru-da-FanTa, Bbaby, TY Dream that I'm Flashing you
SC2Toastie
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
Netherlands5725 Posts
June 18 2015 06:17 GMT
#38
On June 18 2015 02:59 DinoMight wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2015 02:53 Loccstana wrote:
I have some reservations about the disruptor being indestructible while it is charging up for the explosion. This really is unfair against immobile units like lurkers and siege tanks which cant move out of the way in time. Rather, the disruptor should get an armor buff during its charge up period, which would allow it tank low tech units like zerglings, but not high damage units like siege tanks.


It's a 300 gas single melee range unit.

It needs to be able to get in and do damage. Unless it's invulnerable on its way in it will just die immediately.

I agree with you on the 300 gas melee unit that needs to be able to move through the battlefield.

But, I think the problem a lot of people have is with the "invulnerability" combined with a Warp Prism, which makes the unit nigh impossible to kill.

People don't like the idea of 2 Disruptors running though and amoving army (I mean, they are quite hard to spot, especially on the current (TERRIBLE) minimap) and essentially destroying it instantaneously.

Could a massive shield work too? I would like to experiment with that. A 300 HP Shield (preferably with the effect the Immortal should have had; all damage over 10 is reduced max(10 ; 0.5*damage) to 10 or halved, whichever is higher) for the Disruptor. What this means is that the Disruptor has approximately 500 HP to play with when it rushes in AND a defensive mechanic upon activating the Nova. The Nova hits in 4(?) seconds, the shields are removed after 8 seconds (maybe a slight increase in movement speed during this cooldown period as well). Is that enough of a defense to last through a fight? I think it is. It is however not enough to rush into an army head-on. Additionally, EMP can now hurt them as well.

This is obviously me playing with some numbers, but what do you guys think?
Mura Ma Man, Dark Da Dude, Super Shot Sos!
SC2Toastie
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
Netherlands5725 Posts
June 18 2015 06:18 GMT
#39
On June 18 2015 12:38 pure.Wasted wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2015 12:25 MoonyD wrote:
As it stands the Disruptor is pretty much an useless unit in the PvT matchup. The fact terran can just load up everything and take 0 damage makes it super easy to dodge it. I think the Disruptor should do at least a bit of damage versus air. I mean if Protoss goes into Disruptors and Zerg goes for mass mutas, it becomes almost impossible for Protoss to defend their bases after investing so much into what is 'useless tech' vs air.


I'm not going to touch PvZ because I know nothing about it, but why can't Stalkers shoot the Medivacs out of the air once the Terran attempts to GTFO? Get your Stalkers ready for a flank, bring in the Disruptor, and then blink under the Medivacs and pick a couple of them off for free.

There might be a good reason why this isn't possible, I'm genuinely curious.

In theory it's possible, but due to Friendly Fire you cannot jump under the disruptors (Terran can just unload and each marauders one-shots a stalker). Flanking their retreat path is a possibility, but you have to be very careful of reinforcements, Terran unloading, and being picked off / mispositioned for an engagement because your army is essentially split into two with the Terran army in the center (the Terran army will usually win the fight on either side).

It is possible but also very risky, is what I would say.
Mura Ma Man, Dark Da Dude, Super Shot Sos!
Veluvian
Profile Joined December 2011
Bulgaria256 Posts
June 18 2015 07:09 GMT
#40
I agree with the last statement of qxc. The disruptor definately needs some small changes. In the hands of e pro, it could produce very possitive results, but it requires a micro play that is beyond the skill of regular ladder player in the low leagues and it shall not be used unless for some assault/guerilla attacks.
Oz; MMA; Rain; sOs; Classic, Soulkey, TY, Dark
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL Team Wars
19:00
Playoff - 4th vs 3rd
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
ZZZero.O77
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 74
Lillekanin 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 4889
Artosis 81
ZZZero.O 77
sSak 32
NaDa 18
Counter-Strike
fl0m1629
Stewie2K522
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu487
Other Games
Grubby3741
FrodaN2436
SortOf325
Sick194
KnowMe182
NeuroSwarm118
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV40
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 48
• musti20045 39
• StrangeGG 36
• Sammyuel 8
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 22
• RayReign 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22269
League of Legends
• Doublelift5561
Other Games
• imaqtpie1125
• Scarra1005
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
11h 54m
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
12h 54m
OSC
1d 1h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 11h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 11h
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Zoun vs Classic
[ Show More ]
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
BSL Team Wars
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
SEL Season 2 Championship
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.