• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 07:34
CEST 13:34
KST 20:34
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week5[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL70
StarCraft 2
General
TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
$5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Script to open stream directly using middle click A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BW General Discussion ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource! [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 746 users

LotV Beta - TL Strategy first impressions - Page 5

Forum Index > Legacy of the Void
269 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 13 14 Next All
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-05 10:48:04
April 05 2015 10:47 GMT
#81
But it's not just those that are later, it's every single thing. Stim, upgrades, blink, charge...it's all different. I don't think you can expect to adjust a couple of things only. It's not an issue of "zerg is imbalanced", it's an issue of "we have these numbers for a specific economic model, and they all need to be changed for any other economic model".
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-05 10:49:18
April 05 2015 10:48 GMT
#82
On April 05 2015 19:47 Teoita wrote:
But it's not just those that are later, it's every single thing. Stim, upgrades, blink, charge...it's all different. I don't think you can expect to adjust a couple of things only. It's not an issue of "zerg is imbalanced", it's an issue of "we have these numbers for a specific economic model, and they all need to be changed for any other economic model".

I mean, I would think that if the barracks builds in 50 seconds instead of 65, that stim would come 15 seconds earlier? (or maybe not, I've never played terran)
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
berkston
Profile Joined March 2015
6 Posts
April 05 2015 11:04 GMT
#83
TheDwf's very enlightening post actually made me pretty upset... since it's more clear to me now than ever that starcraft 2 never was, nor will it ever be what i wanted. and i'm sort of going to explain why..... but not really..

so any/all of these things are what i wish starcraft had

---- given equal mechanical skill between two players: --

-the winner is almost always determined by better thinking -- lucky wins are a fluke, not a common thing
-there is no "meta" in competitive play, if a player were known to follow such trends they would most likely lose, making it actually impossible to ever reach highly competitive play by only emulating others/doing what is "strongest" or "the only viable option vs. such and such" or whatever
-there is none of this "well he went this so i had to do this", or "well he was protoss and always goes blah blah so ive gotta go blah", but instead a dynamic, open ended game.
-a less than ideal engagement does not end the game, there needs to be opportunity to use quick wit and unexpected, stuff to come back from significant deficit... i dont know like sacrificing the queen, or mel gibson spearing the horses in braveheart, that kind of stuff, to tenaciously earn the right to win.

basically anything that would make it more of a showcase of strategy and skill, rather than just skill and preparation.
i'm not saying i think starcraft isn't a strategy game, i just wish it seemed more like a mental battle, and less of a technical/mechanical one...

it seems impossible, and i can't even imagine a game that fits all of those criteria but personally i'd do this:

-more buildings/units
-certain units only for certain matchups - since what's the point of them all being balanced equally with their full arsenal if there's no such thing as a zerg protoss terran 3 person professional free for all, if a unit just doesn't have a place in a matchup, or is somehow the clear single best choice to win it is removed from that matchup
- no fog of war,
-much slower resource collection, rest stays same speed
-situational need to sacrifice/more reasons to distract/mislead/trick opponents
-more significant attribute bonuses, like the light/armored bonuses, but more specific/critical, like in pokemon, certain things should be weak as crap like a grass vs fire type pokemon, similarly two rock based guys will just butt heads for a while while with little effect, and can't be hurt by electabuzz at all
-less emphasis on abilities, more emphasis on attributes
-more interactivity on maps, like areas you can't fly, or like that one map during campaign where the lava would come up every 5 minutes, maybe storms that weaken certain units, areas that slow, regions with magnetic interference, less sight, naturally occurring localized fog of war, more topography, higher areas out of sight/range bonus, tunnels, valleys, etc.

i rant, but that's the game i wish i had. and i know you can't go too far towards the slower-pure strategy side of the game-spectrum or you'll end up with a turn based strategy, but starcraft is going even further in the opposite direction, which makes me upset. i love the game and watching the professionals because i have lots of respect for the focus/talent required to do what they do. i just wish i could see a game that could showcase more than that, where we could see the most truly creative, strategic, mechanically talented, genius players doing things that could not be predicted, where like in world championship chess players are described as "aggressive", or "defensive", or unpredictable, but never "oh he likes to go something pylon before expanding then he'll usually gas up blah and at 20 supply do this". that's not strategy, that's waiting to see who has a better engagement or if someone will get enough kills with their oracle that they're ahead enough that they will most likely win. i wish i wanted to play again to explore possibilities of the game, to invent a way of doing something that hasn't been done before, and similarly watch at every tournament how pros pull out new tricks and see games that don't always remind me of two games i saw earlier that same day.

i know this is stupidly impossible to accomplish, but i felt like a good rant. and i know a lot of what i said is highly opinionated and a lot isn't necessarily accurate, but rather how the game makes me feel.... i hope that makes sense.
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
April 05 2015 11:04 GMT
#84
Yes but it's not a question a few seconds, it's a question of minutes, which is why im saying the changes need to be more drastic than that. And again, there's the question of wether you are speeding things up too quickly.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
Umpteen
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United Kingdom1570 Posts
April 05 2015 12:05 GMT
#85
I'm on the fence about this.

Sure, it could all go horribly wrong.

On the other hand, I think TheDwf's analogy with Blitz chess is a dangerous oversimplification. Chess is turn-based. Removing thinking time between moves while still requiring moves would be akin to playing SC2 on 2x or 4x or 8x speed, and that's not what's happening here. It still takes time to move armies, it still takes time to traverse the tech tree.

Yes, the way bases dovetail into strategies is going to change. But I don't see that necessarily being a change for the worse when the dust settles. I can easily envisage a more rolling economy translating into more rolling battles. If securing bases is more strategically important than saturating them, giving yourself that buffer to sustain production so that the next expansion isn't instantly do-or-die - well, you're going to have to plan ahead and you're going to need an army - and the extra starting workers can help with that.

Absolutely, things will need to change. Larva inject might need to be nerfed to account for the fact that bases come up quicker and provide additional supply (so fewer larvae into overlords). I could well imagine making Ravagers require an extra building or a roach warren upgrade (not lair, though; that's already overcrowded) to take the sting out of early rushes.

Overall, I'm willing to wait and see what happens.
The existence of a food chain is inescapable if we evolved unsupervised, and inexcusable otherwise.
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
April 05 2015 12:38 GMT
#86
From what I've seen in streams, OP is quality work. I don't like the cyclone much, it's one of those units that are destined to be useless when Blizzard balances them. I hope Blizzard will acknowledge that kind of feedback and doesn't hesitate to make drastic changes to the current model.
8882
Profile Blog Joined December 2003
2718 Posts
April 05 2015 12:49 GMT
#87
At first I thought this was April Fools article. Now I think that Blizzard just wants to make a random, luck based game similar to HearhStone, since this simply sells (and I have been playing a lot of HearhStone).
I have returned
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-05 13:29:10
April 05 2015 13:01 GMT
#88
The 12 starting workers are really a non issue, contrary to popular belief. Yes this accelerates the early game. Yes timings and unit balance will have to account for it, and they definitely can, but imo it's essentially only a good change. And I'd be disappointed if TheDwf's post targeted that change also. It certainly contributes to the so-called time contraction but the real problem is expanding, if anything.
From what I've read, some threads on TL propose alternative mining scaling mechanics that seem really desirable. I'd like Blizzard to at least think about those and not touch base lifetime.

And also, wtf with the "daed game luck based" attitude in this thread? First, the OP isn't that dramatic, so stop agreeing that the game is dead because OP doesn't say that. And second, while I think TheDwf's words were certainly harmoniously put together, I hope people won't be as pessimistic as he is. His post stayed overly general and consensual, not really the type of feedback Blizzard is looking for, that much I can imagine.

Edit: Ok actually let me change my mind a bit on the 12 worker thing. I think that what Blizzard intended was only to cut the downtime at the start of every game, which is an objective everyone should agree with. They probably could have opted for another solution however. Like giving more starting minerals. This would have made the starting 1 base economy less explosive, but upgrade timings have to regardless be looked at if you want to skip the boring worker building phase at the start of the game.
Blizzkrieg
Profile Joined March 2014
95 Posts
April 05 2015 13:56 GMT
#89
Are more starting workers something the players actually asked for..?

..or is it just something to appease the viewers of the game?

I've been against the 12worker start since it's original proposal.
Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed. -Blaise Pascal
[PkF] Wire
Profile Joined March 2013
France24193 Posts
April 05 2015 13:58 GMT
#90
On April 05 2015 22:56 Blizzkrieg wrote:
Are more starting workers something the players actually asked for..?

..or is it just something to appease the viewers of the game?

I've been against the 12worker start since it's original proposal.

I'm pretty adamant 12 is overdoing it and will snowball in big proportions.
Blizzkrieg
Profile Joined March 2014
95 Posts
April 05 2015 14:20 GMT
#91
On April 05 2015 22:58 [PkF] Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2015 22:56 Blizzkrieg wrote:
Are more starting workers something the players actually asked for..?

..or is it just something to appease the viewers of the game?

I've been against the 12worker start since it's original proposal.

I'm pretty adamant 12 is overdoing it and will snowball in big proportions.


I'm glad someone agrees...

I did a search on the blizz forums and couldn't find a single post where someone actually said anything along the lines of "yeah I'm bored with the early game and think starting with 12 workers as opposed to 6 would fix that!"

Shoot, I'd be all for trying out a 4 worker start. The bases would still mine out around the 9-10min mark.
Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed. -Blaise Pascal
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44243 Posts
April 05 2015 14:25 GMT
#92
HuK made an interesting point about disruptors in mineral lines last night, and I was wondering if anyone else could validate his claim or elaborate on it.

He was talking about how disruptors are very strong, but not broken-strong, because players haven't yet learned how to dodge them properly. He talked about how to easily deal with disruptors that get dropped in your mineral line. He noted that disruptors were as large as archons, so if you just keep one static defense building (turret/ spore/ spine/ cannon) in the center of your mineral line, disruptors can't run past it (they'd have to take the long way around the mineral line... around the back). And so if a warp prism drops a disruptor in your mineral line and the disruptor gets activated, you merely have to send your workers to the opposite side of your static structure for a few seconds, and you won't lose workers or much mining time at all (because the disruptor can't chase them properly). Thoughts?
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12246 Posts
April 05 2015 14:32 GMT
#93
That's real interesting, if anything only because it forces the warp prism to go deeper into the base making it a harder move to pull off.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
shadymmj
Profile Joined June 2010
1906 Posts
April 05 2015 14:40 GMT
#94
I don't think I'll return to sc2 with LotV unless some of the problems are fixed, especially those Dwf has laid out. WoL was not too slow; on the contrary, it was too fast. There is no reason to make the game faster except by providing 8 workers to start with. As mentioned, true innovative thinking requires time - time to formulate a plan, and a large enough window to execute it - and not just a hundred games of trying to refine a build we all know (i.e. game prep). LotV as far as I have seen it has de-emphasised this element in favour of chaos and trigger happiness.

Also we know that many RTS gamers shun sc2 in favour of C&C, Total War, TA style games...because in these games mechanics are less of a factor and rightly or wrongly grand strategy plays a greater role in them. Strategy in them is fun. You can do many things and not instantly lose. Try playing a logical "as you like it" game in sc2 and you'll get rolled by the optimal strategy that you scouted and lost to, or cheese that you did not scout in time.

LotV does not need a time bomb to force people to expand or lose. Neither does it need forcefield destroyers (although sentries should be dearer and more powerful to compensate), insta burrowed roaches at 5 minutes into the game, long ranged missile tanks that kite with ease, teleporting BCs etc.

It needs to emphasise economic control, giving players a wide variety of 2 base builds, 3 base builds, slowly progressing to a 6 or 7 base endgame just like in BW. Multitasking and micro are cool to watch but it is okay as they are because artificially inflating the APM floor is the worst, most uncreative, least fun way of bringing players into the game. Instead they should consider weakening AOE and/or spreading out units more, and provide solid space control units to all sides. Perhaps 1 more spellcaster per side that provides unique buffs and specialised abilities without being hard counters. Capital ships should be game enders. Perhaps even including 1-2 limited tech tree and research choices just like in the campaign would allow players to make meaningful decisions and stamp their style on the game.

In short: more strategic options in units upgrades, more thinking, more spatial control, more time in the middlegame, more economy management, less mechanics, less gimmicks, less counters, less dancing around avoiding engagements, no free units.
There is no such thing is "e-sports". There is Brood War, and then there is crap for nerds.
plotspot
Profile Joined October 2014
800 Posts
April 05 2015 14:51 GMT
#95
I've liken Starcraft to a game of rock-paper-scissor before. What players and viewers want are of course interesting rock-paper-scissor games with lots of action and drama. So how can it be done?

Basically turn rock-paper-scissor into an RTS game and making sure that first of all players have enough time to think, play and counterplay. The best player to do so will win, deservedly. So I wholeheartedly agree with TheDWF's aspect about time. Not giving a player enough time to turn paper into a rock in order to beat scissor will be deadly to the game. 100%.

The 2nd aspect is to make the rock-paper-scissor interaction more flexible, which means for example that rock will not always beat scissor, all depending on certain variables. That's what Starcraft actually does, the variables here being numbers, positions, micro.

Any decision Blizzard makes (like adding new units or changing the economy) must not destroy the possibility of counterplay by either cutting on time or flexibilty.
Dekalinder
Profile Joined December 2012
Italy166 Posts
April 05 2015 15:01 GMT
#96
I believe that something like the fact that Inferno Pools is in the beta map pools is a strong indicator that blizz doesn't give a fuck about feedback.
Slydie
Profile Joined August 2013
1913 Posts
April 05 2015 15:16 GMT
#97
One of the most vocal winers about HotS, FilterSC actually loved the way LotV is going in his latest video:


TBH, I believe HotS will feel slow and awkward after a few games of LotV. I am pretty sure I will not miss the first minutes of current games, where I generally just spam 123456 to warm up and every caster try to kill time and hype "oh... that zerg goes hatch-pool and the other pool-hatch for...lets wait and see..."

With the right tweaks, I think the game will improve a lot. There were not that much skill involved in the super-earlygame anyway imo.
Buff the siegetank
DoD_SymphoniC
Profile Joined June 2013
14 Posts
April 05 2015 16:21 GMT
#98
I'd just like to say that TheDwf thoroughly and elegantly described the true issues that the community--and Blizzard--should be addressing with this beta.

Also, the article is excellent and I look forward to a more in-depth look at the new economic models.
KrazyTrumpet
Profile Joined April 2010
United States2520 Posts
April 05 2015 16:37 GMT
#99
After playing even more games, I'm pretty sure I've decided that I really, really don't like the half mineral/reduced gas changes. You just run out of resources way too fast, and it also makes losing an expansion, even early on, utterly disastrous. I like the idea of what it is trying to do, but as said in the first post, I just don't think it's the right way to go about things. I feel like maybe simply taking out one or two mineral patches entirely and going back to normal min/gas amounts would be a better starting approach to altering how the economy works. Anything to change the current SC2 "3 base is all you need" dynamic without making it all feel so....frantic.
www.twitch.tv/krazy Best Stream Quality NA @KClarkSC2
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9376 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-05 17:14:54
April 05 2015 17:01 GMT
#100
On April 05 2015 08:05 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 05 2015 07:54 ArrozConLeche wrote:
First off, I have not played the beta yet. However, just from reading and watching streams I can conclude that the 12 worker change has indeed increased the pace of the game and limited players' reactions, to the point of making expanding dull. In other words, expanding has become an unplanned move that need no thought, like creating workers; most of us dont think about creating workers, rather we built them impulsevly UNLESS we are all-inning.
I think what blizzard intended with Legacy of the Void, is to make pro and beginner levels stand out. And in the long run, this will be the case as it was in broodwar. No longer you will have a 50apm player defeat a 200apm player because of how quickly you have to be in order to keep up with the never ending mineral surplus.

One last comment I wanted to make is that, I know this is a game, an RTS genre to be exact and as such it should be about strategies and everything. However, this game is also an e-sport, if anyone out there wants it to actually be something related to a "sport", then you should be supporting blizzard's move to speed up the game, thus forcing people to become faster and faster with their hands. I know that this game has to also appeal to casual gamers and this is why blizzard has a ranking system.....Moreoever, a real sport is about being mentally and physically fit and this is why I support blizzard's 12 worker change.


In brood war, Flash was considered average to slow on APM, he was nowhere near the fastest player around, but he was the best, specifically because APM wasn't nearly as important as you think it is.

And nobody wants ESPORTS to be exactly like sports, if you want that, just go outside and play soccer (football to non-Americans)


I think what your doing here is a bit deceiving. In this context, APM clearly refers to mechanics. Mechanics are withtout a doubt superimportant in BW, and Idra was quoted as saying that Flash had the best mechanics in BW as his mouse predicision and effective APM was amazing.

For instance, if July hadn't done his muta-micro tricks (which Blizzard never intended) the game wouldn't be what it is.


And if Blizzard actually had studied how moving shot worked in BW, we could have had it in Sc2 without it being a coincidence. Look, you can through intelligent design create great micro interaction. But its not that easy, and the Sc2 development team has historically not been able to do that.

Why not? Because they basically only tweak one variable.... Damage. Its like they have one programmer who creates a unit and then he tells David Kim to balance it. David Kim then plays it a bit and adjust damage up or down if its UP or OP.

Okay, that's very rough, but you gotta wonder how on earth they are so relucant to tweak variables such as damagepoint, range and movement speed on so many units. There is so much micro potential to be unlocked in the game if Blizzard just decided to look at more than the damage variable.

On the other hand, I think TheDwf's analogy with Blitz chess is a dangerous oversimplification. Chess is turn-based. Removing thinking time between moves while still requiring moves would be akin to playing SC2 on 2x or 4x or 8x speed, and that's not what's happening here. It still takes time to move armies, it still takes time to traverse the tech tree.


I agree here. Reading his comment felt like the Emperors new Clothes. Long ramblings about the economy and how Blizzard doesn't understand anything while trying to sound intellectual and give analogies, but in the end there really wasn't much substance. Without a doubt the game could use more periods and action and an an economy is one potential tool (if you do right).
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 12 13 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 7
Cure vs ClemLIVE!
Crank 1408
Tasteless1285
ComeBackTV 1119
IndyStarCraft 215
Rex76
3DClanTV 73
IntoTheiNu 24
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1408
Tasteless 1285
mouzHeroMarine 406
IndyStarCraft 215
Nina 170
Rex 76
StarCraft: Brood War
Jaedong 1116
Nal_rA 641
ToSsGirL 490
firebathero 336
Mini 258
Light 254
JulyZerg 246
Last 206
PianO 185
EffOrt 139
[ Show more ]
Leta 135
Stork 113
Pusan 103
soO 103
Mind 97
sSak 54
sorry 30
Shinee 28
Barracks 26
zelot 21
Icarus 14
Movie 13
SilentControl 8
ivOry 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe460
Counter-Strike
chrisJcsgo130
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor187
Other Games
gofns28585
tarik_tv27455
FrodaN2738
B2W.Neo1145
DeMusliM422
shahzam418
crisheroes388
Fuzer 291
KnowMe136
SortOf135
Lowko115
ArmadaUGS41
Trikslyr28
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick31847
StarCraft: Brood War
CasterMuse 26
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
FEL
26m
FEL
4h 26m
Gerald vs PAPI
Spirit vs ArT
CSO Cup
4h 26m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6h 26m
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
DaveTesta Events
6h 26m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
22h 26m
RSL Revival
22h 26m
Classic vs TBD
FEL
1d 3h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 6h
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Wardi Open
1d 23h
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV European League
3 days
PiGosaur Monday
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.