• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:00
CEST 03:00
KST 10:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt2: Take-Off7[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature4Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy13
Community News
LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments2Weekly Cups (August 25-31): Clem's Last Straw?39Weekly Cups (Aug 18-24): herO dethrones MaxPax6Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris53Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!15
StarCraft 2
General
Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away Production Quality - Maestros of the Game Vs RSL 2 Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies
Brood War
General
Victoria gamers Pros React To: herO's Baffling Game ASL20 General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[IPSL] ISPL Season 1 Winter Qualis and Info! [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Is there English video for group selection for ASL Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Collective Intelligence: Tea…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 711 users

[Patch 8.7] Irelia Rework Discussion - Page 3

Forum Index > LoL General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
April 09 2018 23:10 GMT
#41
On April 10 2018 04:04 Numy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2018 02:41 Jek wrote:
Love they are randomly buffing Sion on PBE, the "nerf" was more of a bugfix and only hit people that cannot land skillshots.

On April 09 2018 19:11 M2 wrote:
On April 09 2018 17:34 evilfatsh1t wrote:
NERF CONQUEROR

is conquer an issue? on whom? jax?

Nobody. It just means you can actually kill tanks and toplane is again action packed. :3

It was action packed before as well, tanks sucked outside of Sion and still do.

Guess that's why tanks where picked in nearly every game in all regions finals.
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
Numy
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
South Africa35471 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-11 09:21:50
April 11 2018 09:10 GMT
#42
On April 10 2018 08:10 Jek wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 10 2018 04:04 Numy wrote:
On April 10 2018 02:41 Jek wrote:
Love they are randomly buffing Sion on PBE, the "nerf" was more of a bugfix and only hit people that cannot land skillshots.

On April 09 2018 19:11 M2 wrote:
On April 09 2018 17:34 evilfatsh1t wrote:
NERF CONQUEROR

is conquer an issue? on whom? jax?

Nobody. It just means you can actually kill tanks and toplane is again action packed. :3

It was action packed before as well, tanks sucked outside of Sion and still do.

Guess that's why tanks where picked in nearly every game in all regions finals.

Competitive play is not the same as solo Q. Unless you one of those professional players those stats are meaningless. It's like Galio being a highly contested pick in comp play doesn't translate to solo q. Every metric in solo Q since the start of the season has shown that the only tanks be played are Ornn and Sion but after the Ornn nerfs he isn't seen much. Malphite has picked up a little bit but top lane is mostly carry orientated heroes. Gangplank for example has been one of if not the best top laner since the start of the season.

The narrative that top lane was just tank fest is unfortunately just fiction. If you wanted to have that kind of narrative you'd have to look maybe a year to a year and a half ago.

In other news they already nerfed Irelia so much. That kind of sucks especially when there's a stupid bug that could be growing her power by a fair amount.

ps: It's quite interesting you mention regional finals as evidence of tank fest while ignoring LPL and LCK which show a far more carry orientated slant. Speaks to how Western teams aren't comfortable with having a damage orientated top lane for the most part. G2 were in this position which is partly why Fnatic target banned him so heavily forcing a more passive stance that G2 didn't necessarily want out of Wunder. Context is important.

Top lane from a diversity of playstyle stand point has been possibly the best it's ever been this season Bottom side of the map may have a larger impact but that's another type of metric to look at.
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
April 11 2018 13:48 GMT
#43
The narrative isn't that toplane is nothing but tanks, it is that tanks can stonewall the lane very easy in nearly all match ups making nothing happen unless the jungler is there leaving the "better jungler win" feel whenever there's a tank involved. Unless you're fed there's zero counterplay to a Sion, Cho'Gath or <inserttankwithwaveclear> nearly insta-clearing the wave despite having build nothing but defensive items, Conqueror is a step in the right direction to solve the tanks option to brute force anti-fun on you.

Gangplank, Swain and Camille are sort of oddballs since they are perfectly fine with the farmfest as they are just a walking timebomb.
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
Numy
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
South Africa35471 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-11 14:11:14
April 11 2018 14:07 GMT
#44
So let me get this straight. Tanks are not that strong, they do not have a high pick rate either yet they can completely negate the other top laner with no effort? If this is true then it implies tanks are masters at laning phase but fall off rapidly post laning otherwise they would be the dominant force in league. That doesn't sound right.

If you look at what's been strong historically in top lane this season. GP, Camille, Fiora, Illaoi, Sion, Ornn, Vlad, Kled,panth it paints a weird picture. One where you hear "tanks stonewalling everything making toplane bad" but then they don't have corresponding playrates or winrates or even mastery rates. So what's going on? Cho for instance is one of the easiest to abuse tanks in the early game.

So is this a case of a minor class of heroes that aren't particularly strong having such adverse play patterns that it burns this into peoples memories? It's really interesting why this kind of thing has happened when supporting evidence is just not there. Placebo? Marketing from Hashinshin types?

edit: I wonder if it's playstyles changing while people refuse to change? Do the better players in league at the top just shift the way they play to make their post laning impact highest which means tanks become weaker hence why the evidence isn't there? Is it a self correcting metagame thing?
Slayer91
Profile Joined February 2006
Ireland23335 Posts
April 11 2018 15:05 GMT
#45
On April 09 2018 19:11 M2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2018 17:34 evilfatsh1t wrote:
NERF CONQUEROR

is conquer an issue? on whom? jax?


every game i played jax top lane conqueror gave less damage than aftershock would probably have given
seemed pathetic. against super resist heavy tanks maybe it's good though.
NpG)Explosive
Profile Joined January 2003
France994 Posts
April 11 2018 15:23 GMT
#46
On April 12 2018 00:05 Slayer91 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 09 2018 19:11 M2 wrote:
On April 09 2018 17:34 evilfatsh1t wrote:
NERF CONQUEROR

is conquer an issue? on whom? jax?


every game i played jax top lane conqueror gave less damage than aftershock would probably have given
seemed pathetic. against super resist heavy tanks maybe it's good though.

Conqueror tooltip only tracks the true damage dealt. It also gives some bonus ad (10 ad at level 1 is clearly relevant) but we don't know how much extra damage we got from this. I don't play toplane so I can't comment on how good the rune feel.
As an ADC main, coup de grace is dealing less extra damage than cutdown by a large margin but stats suggest both options are about equal. Coup de grace gives extra AD on takedowns which probably makes up for it.
loSleb
Profile Joined December 2010
Austria1389 Posts
April 11 2018 16:11 GMT
#47
On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
So let me get this straight. Tanks are not that strong, they do not have a high pick rate either yet they can completely negate the other top laner with no effort? If this is true then it implies tanks are masters at laning phase but fall off rapidly post laning otherwise they would be the dominant force in league. That doesn't sound right.

If you look at what's been strong historically in top lane this season. GP, Camille, Fiora, Illaoi, Sion, Ornn, Vlad, Kled,panth it paints a weird picture. One where you hear "tanks stonewalling everything making toplane bad" but then they don't have corresponding playrates or winrates or even mastery rates. So what's going on? Cho for instance is one of the easiest to abuse tanks in the early game.

So is this a case of a minor class of heroes that aren't particularly strong having such adverse play patterns that it burns this into peoples memories? It's really interesting why this kind of thing has happened when supporting evidence is just not there. Placebo? Marketing from Hashinshin types?

edit: I wonder if it's playstyles changing while people refuse to change? Do the better players in league at the top just shift the way they play to make their post laning impact highest which means tanks become weaker hence why the evidence isn't there? Is it a self correcting metagame thing?


Somtimes it would be nice if people actually played the game. When everyone complains the reason they aren't overrepresented could maybe be that only few people enjoy them? Lee Sin is still the most played jungler while he is quite shit.

The problem is not that I cannot play other champions anymore. The problem is that the autofilled toplaner can go Sion top and waveclear all day, maybe even die a few times and he still has decent impact on the teamfights while being braindead. It's very similiar to why the Janna e-girl meme exists you basicly do nothing and still perform decently.

Also about toplane this season being about those champs.
GP was fucking busted at the start (and still is good) and is probably even worse than tanks to play against.
Camille is the one other champion that is not a tank that is picked regularly.
Fiora is fucking terrible and loses almost every game she gets picked.
Illaoi was literally only there to counter tanks(Ornn).
Vlad was pretty much instantly nerfed by removing that gp10 items and nobody plays him after that.
Who even plays Kled lol?

Only other pick there is thats not a tank (also there arent even many more tanks that get picked in comp at least) is Gnar.

What gets picked toplane is so different from what is actually good in Soloq, so many Yasuo, Riven, etc one tricks running around the stats really get fucked by things like that.

If I go ADC/Mid I can't think really of a champion that I would want my autofilled guy on. Meanwhile in Top everyone would be like "go tank".

Toplane being the easiest to gank also makes gold dependent champs even worse and people will flame you if you don't go play a tank when the jungler picks something else.

Tanks being quite strong with 0 resources might be a result of the laneswap meta where champs had to work with 0 farm. It could also be because while everyone complains about tanks people still always want one in their team so as soon as we see metas without them they get buffed back.
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
April 11 2018 16:18 GMT
#48
On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
So let me get this straight. Tanks are not that strong, they do not have a high pick rate either yet they can completely negate the other top laner with no effort? If this is true then it implies tanks are masters at laning phase but fall off rapidly post laning otherwise they would be the dominant force in league. That doesn't sound right.

Very strong laners that fall off compared to their opponent isn't really that unheard of. The Jax vs Renekton matches years ago would be a prime example.

On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
If you look at what's been strong historically in top lane this season. GP, Camille, Fiora, Illaoi, Sion, Ornn, Vlad, Kled,panth it paints a weird picture. One where you hear "tanks stonewalling everything making toplane bad" but then they don't have corresponding playrates or winrates or even mastery rates. So what's going on? Cho for instance is one of the easiest to abuse tanks in the early game.

Cant you see what they all have in common? They are all either tanks or good against tanks.

On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
So is this a case of a minor class of heroes that aren't particularly strong having such adverse play patterns that it burns this into peoples memories? It's really interesting why this kind of thing has happened when supporting evidence is just not there. Placebo? Marketing from Hashinshin types?

Placebo? Hashinshin? Come on. Anyone that have played against perma-shoving immovable tanks know how horrible anti-fun it is if you're not playing a champion that are well equiped to deal with it. Being shoved in by champs like Gnar, Jayce or Vlad is different it feels like an actual interactive game where outplays are way more likely to happen.

I suppose I would agree with it being a minor class that have a horrible pattern so it forms a bias. But as a filthy Janna main I'm probably not one to complain about horrible play patterns. :^)

On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
edit: I wonder if it's playstyles changing while people refuse to change? Do the better players in league at the top just shift the way they play to make their post laning impact highest which means tanks become weaker hence why the evidence isn't there? Is it a self correcting metagame thing?

I believe it's a bit of it all.

The better players play to win and just go with/search for the most efficient way to accomplish it at that given patch while the more casual value their entertainment higher than trends.
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
April 11 2018 16:36 GMT
#49
--- Nuked ---
Slusher
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States19143 Posts
April 11 2018 17:08 GMT
#50
I think you have to be ranked in flex to play idk I only glanced at it
Carrilord has arrived.
Numy
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
South Africa35471 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-11 17:59:23
April 11 2018 17:58 GMT
#51
On April 12 2018 01:11 loSleb wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
So let me get this straight. Tanks are not that strong, they do not have a high pick rate either yet they can completely negate the other top laner with no effort? If this is true then it implies tanks are masters at laning phase but fall off rapidly post laning otherwise they would be the dominant force in league. That doesn't sound right.

If you look at what's been strong historically in top lane this season. GP, Camille, Fiora, Illaoi, Sion, Ornn, Vlad, Kled,panth it paints a weird picture. One where you hear "tanks stonewalling everything making toplane bad" but then they don't have corresponding playrates or winrates or even mastery rates. So what's going on? Cho for instance is one of the easiest to abuse tanks in the early game.

So is this a case of a minor class of heroes that aren't particularly strong having such adverse play patterns that it burns this into peoples memories? It's really interesting why this kind of thing has happened when supporting evidence is just not there. Placebo? Marketing from Hashinshin types?

edit: I wonder if it's playstyles changing while people refuse to change? Do the better players in league at the top just shift the way they play to make their post laning impact highest which means tanks become weaker hence why the evidence isn't there? Is it a self correcting metagame thing?


Somtimes it would be nice if people actually played the game. When everyone complains the reason they aren't overrepresented could maybe be that only few people enjoy them? Lee Sin is still the most played jungler while he is quite shit.

The problem is not that I cannot play other champions anymore. The problem is that the autofilled toplaner can go Sion top and waveclear all day, maybe even die a few times and he still has decent impact on the teamfights while being braindead. It's very similiar to why the Janna e-girl meme exists you basicly do nothing and still perform decently.

Also about toplane this season being about those champs.
GP was fucking busted at the start (and still is good) and is probably even worse than tanks to play against.
Camille is the one other champion that is not a tank that is picked regularly.
Fiora is fucking terrible and loses almost every game she gets picked.
Illaoi was literally only there to counter tanks(Ornn).
Vlad was pretty much instantly nerfed by removing that gp10 items and nobody plays him after that.
Who even plays Kled lol?

Only other pick there is thats not a tank (also there arent even many more tanks that get picked in comp at least) is Gnar.

What gets picked toplane is so different from what is actually good in Soloq, so many Yasuo, Riven, etc one tricks running around the stats really get fucked by things like that.

If I go ADC/Mid I can't think really of a champion that I would want my autofilled guy on. Meanwhile in Top everyone would be like "go tank".

Toplane being the easiest to gank also makes gold dependent champs even worse and people will flame you if you don't go play a tank when the jungler picks something else.

Tanks being quite strong with 0 resources might be a result of the laneswap meta where champs had to work with 0 farm. It could also be because while everyone complains about tanks people still always want one in their team so as soon as we see metas without them they get buffed back.

You know a thought I had reading this was that maybe it's far simplier than any of this. You mentioned Sion there but noone else. Everyone mentions Sion. I mentioned Sion. Is it tanks being strong of tank Sion being insanely strong? Sion is the only tank that's been at the top throughout this season. He's the only relevant tank. He's a monster in Comp play as well. Ornn and Cho aren't particularly great in solo Q, Cho is easily abused and takes awhile to get to his immovable phase, he's situationally a beast which is fine for a hero. Ornn has a stronger laning phase but is far harder to use later.

What I'm trying to get at, is this really a tank issue? If Sion was nerfed right now to the gutter would this conversation exist? I'm not really sure if you trying to take a jab at me for that first line or something else.
AdsMoFro
Profile Joined January 2015
Japan4761 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-12 00:45:32
April 11 2018 18:19 GMT
#52
On April 12 2018 01:36 JimmiC wrote:
Anyone doing this clash thing this weekend? I'm interested NA top plat last few seasons only gold right now but have not played serious or much, Low plat is fair of my skill level.


Making a clash LFT thread soonTM. Watch out for it.

UPDATE > https://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/lol-general/532903-ll-na-clash-signup-and-setup#1
Que Sera Sera
Jek
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark2771 Posts
April 12 2018 00:12 GMT
#53
On April 12 2018 02:58 Numy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 12 2018 01:11 loSleb wrote:
On April 11 2018 23:07 Numy wrote:
So let me get this straight. Tanks are not that strong, they do not have a high pick rate either yet they can completely negate the other top laner with no effort? If this is true then it implies tanks are masters at laning phase but fall off rapidly post laning otherwise they would be the dominant force in league. That doesn't sound right.

If you look at what's been strong historically in top lane this season. GP, Camille, Fiora, Illaoi, Sion, Ornn, Vlad, Kled,panth it paints a weird picture. One where you hear "tanks stonewalling everything making toplane bad" but then they don't have corresponding playrates or winrates or even mastery rates. So what's going on? Cho for instance is one of the easiest to abuse tanks in the early game.

So is this a case of a minor class of heroes that aren't particularly strong having such adverse play patterns that it burns this into peoples memories? It's really interesting why this kind of thing has happened when supporting evidence is just not there. Placebo? Marketing from Hashinshin types?

edit: I wonder if it's playstyles changing while people refuse to change? Do the better players in league at the top just shift the way they play to make their post laning impact highest which means tanks become weaker hence why the evidence isn't there? Is it a self correcting metagame thing?


Somtimes it would be nice if people actually played the game. When everyone complains the reason they aren't overrepresented could maybe be that only few people enjoy them? Lee Sin is still the most played jungler while he is quite shit.

The problem is not that I cannot play other champions anymore. The problem is that the autofilled toplaner can go Sion top and waveclear all day, maybe even die a few times and he still has decent impact on the teamfights while being braindead. It's very similiar to why the Janna e-girl meme exists you basicly do nothing and still perform decently.

Also about toplane this season being about those champs.
GP was fucking busted at the start (and still is good) and is probably even worse than tanks to play against.
Camille is the one other champion that is not a tank that is picked regularly.
Fiora is fucking terrible and loses almost every game she gets picked.
Illaoi was literally only there to counter tanks(Ornn).
Vlad was pretty much instantly nerfed by removing that gp10 items and nobody plays him after that.
Who even plays Kled lol?

Only other pick there is thats not a tank (also there arent even many more tanks that get picked in comp at least) is Gnar.

What gets picked toplane is so different from what is actually good in Soloq, so many Yasuo, Riven, etc one tricks running around the stats really get fucked by things like that.

If I go ADC/Mid I can't think really of a champion that I would want my autofilled guy on. Meanwhile in Top everyone would be like "go tank".

Toplane being the easiest to gank also makes gold dependent champs even worse and people will flame you if you don't go play a tank when the jungler picks something else.

Tanks being quite strong with 0 resources might be a result of the laneswap meta where champs had to work with 0 farm. It could also be because while everyone complains about tanks people still always want one in their team so as soon as we see metas without them they get buffed back.

You know a thought I had reading this was that maybe it's far simplier than any of this. You mentioned Sion there but noone else. Everyone mentions Sion. I mentioned Sion. Is it tanks being strong of tank Sion being insanely strong? Sion is the only tank that's been at the top throughout this season. He's the only relevant tank. He's a monster in Comp play as well. Ornn and Cho aren't particularly great in solo Q, Cho is easily abused and takes awhile to get to his immovable phase, he's situationally a beast which is fine for a hero. Ornn has a stronger laning phase but is far harder to use later.

What I'm trying to get at, is this really a tank issue? If Sion was nerfed right now to the gutter would this conversation exist? I'm not really sure if you trying to take a jab at me for that first line or something else.

Sion is just the current worst offender. Riot have been shoving this down our throat ever since they decided champs like Fizz and Ekko are not allowed to be played like bruisers.
It's Elo not ELO - Every statiscian playing League
DarkCore
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany4194 Posts
April 12 2018 07:33 GMT
#54
Sion is an example of how an individual champion's kit can supersede the low priority of his champion class: tanks aren't super strong right now, but Sion has so many things going for him that he gets picked often.

I think tanks are in a good position, the problem is that their counters are pretty strong right now. GP, Camille, Fiora all love a good farm fest because there comes a point where they can blow up the tank and split push like no tomorrow. If they get ahead of the tank early, it gets even worse, but if they fall behind, then in most matchups all it means is that they'll have to play safe and wait for the 30 minute mark.
Fixed a bug where LeBlanc could lose
loSleb
Profile Joined December 2010
Austria1389 Posts
April 14 2018 10:14 GMT
#55
[image loading]
Tanks aren't strong, LCK doesn't play tanks, hard lol.
M2
Profile Joined December 2002
Bulgaria4120 Posts
April 14 2018 10:27 GMT
#56
On April 14 2018 19:14 loSleb wrote:
[image loading]
Tanks aren't strong, LCK doesn't play tanks, hard lol.

Well, I see two adcs and full utility/tank morgana hahaha
Knife kitty, night kitty, put you on a slab. Stealthy kitty, hunter kitty, stab stab stab :-)
Ansibled
Profile Joined November 2014
United Kingdom9872 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-15 01:46:39
April 15 2018 01:45 GMT
#57
cheep clash strategies

'StarCraft is just a fairy tale told to scare children actually.'
TL+ Member
iCanada
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada10660 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-15 04:18:49
April 15 2018 03:54 GMT
#58
The clash is awesome as fuck.

Also; I actually think building trinity force on Xin Zhao is straight up bad. Everyone thinks its the build, but like... idk man. You actually do just practically as much damage to squishies if you can hit your W with Black cleaver, you're tankier, and you get the same sticking power. All you lose is Attack speed which is kinda whatever on melees.

For shits and giggles, say you are level 11 with just trinity force or just black cleaver. lets assume you get a full Xin rotation off (W + E + R + autoQautoauto) assuming phase rush without celerity / water walking:

[image loading]

With Trinity force you do 85.75 more damage WITHOUT taking into account resistances or armor shred. Realistically, you do ~10% armor shred with cleaver. You also have 150 HP Now you have to consider that your ADC is shooting that thing. On a squishy champ, its very close. Against a tanky ass champion, Cleaver hard out preforms Trinity force.

Thing is, thats pretty damn close in effective combat power on a squishy champ; but you have to consider that junglers average around 200 gold per minute without taking into account starting gold or map objectives; that means you are getting cleaver 733/200 = 3.7 minutes sooner in the game than trinity force. And when you would have trinity you have Cleaver + Cleaver + kindlegem or cleaver + 2 cloth armor. If you get Cleaver & 2 longs swords cleaver actually does 55 damage more.

I think if you just rush Trinity + Steraks then trinity better, but like, I dont think you can build Warrior + Trinity + Steraks and not die immediately.
Amui
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Canada10567 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-15 05:02:27
April 15 2018 05:01 GMT
#59
On April 15 2018 12:54 iCanada wrote:
The clash is awesome as fuck.

Also; I actually think building trinity force on Xin Zhao is straight up bad. Everyone thinks its the build, but like... idk man. You actually do just practically as much damage to squishies if you can hit your W with Black cleaver, you're tankier, and you get the same sticking power. All you lose is Attack speed which is kinda whatever on melees.

For shits and giggles, say you are level 11 with just trinity force or just black cleaver. lets assume you get a full Xin rotation off (W + E + R + autoQautoauto) assuming phase rush without celerity / water walking:

[image loading]

With Trinity force you do 85.75 more damage WITHOUT taking into account resistances or armor shred. Realistically, you do ~10% armor shred with cleaver. You also have 150 HP Now you have to consider that your ADC is shooting that thing. On a squishy champ, its very close. Against a tanky ass champion, Cleaver hard out preforms Trinity force.

Thing is, thats pretty damn close in effective combat power on a squishy champ; but you have to consider that junglers average around 200 gold per minute without taking into account starting gold or map objectives; that means you are getting cleaver 733/200 = 3.7 minutes sooner in the game than trinity force. And when you would have trinity you have Cleaver + Cleaver + kindlegem or cleaver + 2 cloth armor. If you get Cleaver & 2 longs swords cleaver actually does 55 damage more.

I think if you just rush Trinity + Steraks then trinity better, but like, I dont think you can build Warrior + Trinity + Steraks and not die immediately.

Some of the triforce budget comes from attack speed and movement speed, which are good stats when Q takes several attacks to proc.

That damage also doesn't take into account the extra second or so it takes to do the full combo with cleaver instead of triforce from the attack speed difference.

I would agree that triforce is hard to build out of the jungle unless you're fed or okay with being useless for a while.
Porouscloud - NA LoL
iCanada
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada10660 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-04-15 05:29:00
April 15 2018 05:26 GMT
#60
On April 15 2018 14:01 Amui wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 15 2018 12:54 iCanada wrote:
The clash is awesome as fuck.

Also; I actually think building trinity force on Xin Zhao is straight up bad. Everyone thinks its the build, but like... idk man. You actually do just practically as much damage to squishies if you can hit your W with Black cleaver, you're tankier, and you get the same sticking power. All you lose is Attack speed which is kinda whatever on melees.

For shits and giggles, say you are level 11 with just trinity force or just black cleaver. lets assume you get a full Xin rotation off (W + E + R + autoQautoauto) assuming phase rush without celerity / water walking:

[image loading]

With Trinity force you do 85.75 more damage WITHOUT taking into account resistances or armor shred. Realistically, you do ~10% armor shred with cleaver. You also have 150 HP Now you have to consider that your ADC is shooting that thing. On a squishy champ, its very close. Against a tanky ass champion, Cleaver hard out preforms Trinity force.

Thing is, thats pretty damn close in effective combat power on a squishy champ; but you have to consider that junglers average around 200 gold per minute without taking into account starting gold or map objectives; that means you are getting cleaver 733/200 = 3.7 minutes sooner in the game than trinity force. And when you would have trinity you have Cleaver + Cleaver + kindlegem or cleaver + 2 cloth armor. If you get Cleaver & 2 longs swords cleaver actually does 55 damage more.

I think if you just rush Trinity + Steraks then trinity better, but like, I dont think you can build Warrior + Trinity + Steraks and not die immediately.

Some of the triforce budget comes from attack speed and movement speed, which are good stats when Q takes several attacks to proc.

That damage also doesn't take into account the extra second or so it takes to do the full combo with cleaver instead of triforce from the attack speed difference.

I would agree that triforce is hard to build out of the jungle unless you're fed or okay with being useless for a while.


The difference in attack speed is real small. Its just 2 attack cool downs, and your already have +40% attack speed from E. You also get the move-speed from Black Cleaver. Difference of 1.363 attacks per second and 1.129 attacks per second.

The difference is 1.54s for the auto attack portions vs 1.72s for the auto attack portion @ level 11.

I think if you are fed enough for triforce to be better than Cleaver, you legit could build like Nashors tooth + Deathcap and it be K.

http://na.op.gg/champion/xinzhao/statistics/jungle

Thing is, literally everyone is building trinity and not BC.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 9h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 106
RuFF_SC2 62
Vindicta 24
StarCraft: Brood War
sSak 37
NaDa 28
Dota 2
monkeys_forever771
LuMiX0
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K424
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor88
Other Games
tarik_tv7112
summit1g6000
Nathanias1223
shahzam544
JimRising 511
C9.Mang0293
ViBE184
Maynarde116
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV25
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta64
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RaNgeD 4
• iopq 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra510
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
9h
RSL Revival
9h
GuMiho vs Cham
ByuN vs TriGGeR
Cosmonarchy
13h
TriGGeR vs YoungYakov
YoungYakov vs HonMonO
HonMonO vs TriGGeR
Maestros of the Game
16h
Solar vs Bunny
Clem vs Rogue
[BSL 2025] Weekly
17h
OSC
21h
RSL Revival
1d 9h
Cure vs Bunny
Creator vs Zoun
Maestros of the Game
1d 16h
Maru vs Lambo
herO vs ShoWTimE
BSL Team Wars
1d 18h
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
The PondCast
5 days
Online Event
6 days
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-02
SEL Season 2 Championship

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL Polish World Championship 2025: Warsaw LAN
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.