| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:45 Alaric wrote: Get good enough that you trash your opponent before you attract the jungler's attention, or even enough that he never feels too needed there. Oh, and buy a sightstone when you can, so you won't get ganked anyway. no where near what i asked. | ||
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:43 Chiharu Harukaze wrote: It might be an academy, but who's going to teach them? What resources to they even have for reference material? I guess they would need a partnership with a pro team since they don't have one of their own yet. Maybe they can work with the MVP teams since the two orgs are familiar with each other. | ||
|
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:43 Chiharu Harukaze wrote: It might be an academy, but who's going to teach them? What resources to they even have for reference material? Professor HSGG. Splitpushing 101. Advanced Splitpushing 201. Splitpushing Internship with CLG.NA. | ||
|
Kouda
United States2205 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:46 MoonBear wrote: Who came out of their SC2 Academy? SC2 has much more material to work with, the theory is understood, and I feel like a coach can be more successful because you already have frameworks for what you want to be achieving, theory you want to teach, replays to utilise, etc. I'm not sure it's as possible in LoL. gosuuser and sasquatch. Which are the "better NA" players, not that it means much, but it's still fostering NA talent. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
honestly if a guy I had never heard of came in here and said that they might have gotten a real answer but you've made so many anti lol and generally trolly comments that I can't see how anyone wouldn't just take it as an lol rip that said if you hate mid/top just ask for other shit, they are the most popular by far I doubt you'd be "forced" to play mid/top in more than 5% of your games. | ||
|
Mondeezy
United States1938 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:44 PrinceXizor wrote: i wanted an answer not a scolding and someone telling me "get better" because that doesn't change the nature of the lane any. :/ i don't understand how those lanes are fun. that is why i brought it here. It's not a QQ but a question. What makes those lanes fun? I see people call top and mid more than anything, but when i get put in the roles i feel like my time is being wasted. support waaay more fun. Matchups. The feeling of being able to crush your opponent 1v1, and if good enough, being able to 1v2 the opponent and the jungle. It's not for everyone, but I enjoy it because of the matchup variety and all of the different champs I can play there. | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:51 Slusher wrote: honestly if a guy I had never heard of came in here and said that they might have gotten a real answer but you've made so many anti lol and generally trolly comments that I can't see how anyone wouldn't just take it as an lol rip that said if you hate mid/top just ask for other shit, they are the most popular by far I doubt you'd be "forced" to play mid/top in more than 5% of your games. :/ i don't get forced into it often. i just don't get the appeal and i wanted to ask the mid/top players why they like it. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
dunno if that helps. | ||
|
Slow Motion
United States6960 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:52 Mondeezy wrote: Matchups. The feeling of being able to crush your opponent 1v1, and if good enough, being able to 1v2 the opponent and the jungle. It's not for everyone, but I enjoy it because of the matchup variety and all of the different champs I can play there. Well if you get camped top by jungle it's a pretty shitty and boring game for you even if you play well and don't die, and even if the rest of your team wins. Mid shouldn't be a problem though. You have way more options than simply staying in lane, such as farming jungle or roaming. | ||
|
Alaric
France45622 Posts
| ||
MoonBear
Straight outta Johto18973 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:49 JBright wrote: I guess they would need a partnership with a pro team since they don't have one of their own yet. Maybe they can work with the MVP teams since the two orgs are familiar with each other. That... would be quite interesting! Hm. On December 07 2012 09:50 Kouda wrote: gosuuser and sasquatch. Which are the "better NA" players, not that it means much, but it's still fostering NA talent. Hm. I've not heard of them but I don't follow SC2 much any more. I applaud fostering talent, I just wonder how effective it will be given how under developed LoL is, analytics-wise. The closest we have to things like the Liquipedia Strategy section or the TLFE is what we've done here in our TL articles. Unless I guess coL is ok with their LoL team doing nothing but Double AP-Skarner, low economy and Triple Teleport Promote. That would be kinda cool actually lol. | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
Top Comments IntoTheWow 1 hour ago This is the best interview ever. ·14 | ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
You do understand you asked a rhetorical question right? | ||
|
PrinceXizor
United States17713 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:59 willoc wrote: You do understand you asked a rhetorical question right? it's only rhetorical if i mean it as one. i was asking how someone can find it fun and i wanted responses. Telling someone they said a rhetorical question is like telling someone they were sarcastic. it's the intent that matters. and yeah intent sucks via text. | ||
|
jcarlsoniv
United States27922 Posts
On December 07 2012 10:01 PrinceXizor wrote: it's only rhetorical if i mean it as one. i was asking how someone can find it fun and i wanted responses. Telling someone they said a rhetorical question is like telling someone they were sarcastic. it's the intent that matters. and yeah intent sucks via text. "Fun" is a subjective term. If you don't like those lanes, don't fucking play them. Stop. | ||
onlywonderboy
United States23745 Posts
On December 07 2012 09:57 MoonBear wrote: That... would be quite interesting! Hm. Hm. I've not heard of them but I don't follow SC2 much any more. I applaud fostering talent, I just wonder how effective it will be given how under developed LoL is, analytics-wise. The closest we have to things like the Liquipedia Strategy section or the TLFE is what we've done here in our TL articles. Unless I guess coL is ok with their LoL team doing nothing but Double AP-Skarner, low economy and Triple Teleport Promote. That would be kinda cool actually lol. I would also assume that pro teams might be willing to scrim them if they have a sponsor rather than just some random no name team. From what I've read, you can analysis a lot in SC without actully playing, in LoL you kinda just gotta jump in and see what works. But having access to scrim good teams would be helpful. | ||
|
Irave
United States9965 Posts
Dig using Rhux | ||
|
GARO
United States2255 Posts
And that hot_bid interview way too good | ||
NeoIllusions
United States37500 Posts
So gud | ||
|
HazMat
United States17077 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games tarik_tv7684 Grubby2384 shahzam807 B2W.Neo365 ToD230 mouzStarbuck217 XaKoH  197Livibee67 Trikslyr54 SteadfastSC36 |
|
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
