EPT
[Patch 1.0.0.129: Fizz] General Discussion - Page 149
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
| ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
| ||
|
DrKlingmann
Poland356 Posts
Range of interest is simplified to just few teams and players. Mostly CLG and TSM.. which I find utterly boring. | ||
|
mr_tolkien
France8631 Posts
| ||
|
shinarit
Hungary900 Posts
my poor horned girl Im trying to think of one reason to pick Soraka over Sona, but i cant find any. Only if the other side picks Sona in draft and you want sustain, any other case is obviously Sona. I think we would need a scaling on her passive, because 16 MR is not much lategame. | ||
|
R04R
United States1631 Posts
| ||
|
shinarit
Hungary900 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:27 R04R wrote: Soraka can burst heal far more than Sona can late game. One of them is global too. Ok, i was talking about laning phase sustain, ofc. | ||
|
BlackPaladin
United States9316 Posts
| ||
|
Parnage
United States7414 Posts
On a side note, who wants to take bet's on Wit's End being nerfed somehow because of it's recent popularity on junglers and some top lanes? | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:25 shinarit wrote: Guys, you know that Soraka is not really a good healer anymore, right? Not better than Sona. The fact is, you dont HAVE TO play agressive with Sona, its just so tempting. But if you level her W and only use mana for heals, she outheals Soraka. Its long over that Soraka was the best healer my poor horned girl Im trying to think of one reason to pick Soraka over Sona, but i cant find any. Only if the other side picks Sona in draft and you want sustain, any other case is obviously Sona. I think we would need a scaling on her passive, because 16 MR is not much lategame. How about being able to silence in a taric lane/silence ganks, sona can't do that. Have rammus roll at you and silence him before he can taunt etc. Just an example. | ||
|
spinesheath
Germany8679 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:25 shinarit wrote: I think we would need a scaling on her passive, because 16 MR is not much lategame. I don't think you thought that through. Earlygame, Soraka's passive grants 2x16 MR, worth ~500 gold. As the game goes on, fights involve more players. Up to the point where Soraka's passive grants 5x16 MR, worth ~1200 gold. Add a lvl scaling on top of that and it becomes ridiculous. Just like people claiming that Aegis is useless lategame... That's nonsense. | ||
|
Hynda
Sweden2226 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:25 shinarit wrote: Guys, you know that Soraka is not really a good healer anymore, right? Not better than Sona. The fact is, you dont HAVE TO play agressive with Sona, its just so tempting. But if you level her W and only use mana for heals, she outheals Soraka. Its long over that Soraka was the best healer my poor horned girl Im trying to think of one reason to pick Soraka over Sona, but i cant find any. Only if the other side picks Sona in draft and you want sustain, any other case is obviously Sona. I think we would need a scaling on her passive, because 16 MR is not much lategame. Yes she is, as a healer she is much much better than sona. | ||
|
barbsq
United States5348 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:29 BlackPaladin wrote: 125 armor + can also give mana in lane is not something to laugh about. this. sona is better off leveling q as it provides much better lane control, otherwise she literally is just a shitty vers of soraka that cannot provide mana (unless you get mana manip lvl 1 which is just.... uncommon i guess i'll say). It's like maxing heal first on cow. I mean yeah, you could do it, and it would probably provide pretty decent sustain too, but that's not really the reason u got cow is it? | ||
|
Firesilver
United Kingdom1190 Posts
On November 28 2011 03:57 spinesheath wrote: 200 ping is doable for many champs for the "bottom" 99.9% of players. I play at 200+ ping on US all the time. Literally all the time. A bit more and it become really bad though. Same, I do agree it can be annoying at the start but you get used to it but it's not that much of a problem really. | ||
|
JackDino
Gabon6219 Posts
| ||
|
cascades
Singapore6122 Posts
| ||
|
freelander
Hungary4707 Posts
On November 28 2011 17:12 Ferrose wrote: Rejoice, men: only one more day of free week Vayne on your team feeding the enemy's AD! I haven't bought champions for a while, then I bought Vayne last week and then she was free next week I forgot the rule | ||
|
zalz
Netherlands3704 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:25 shinarit wrote: Guys, you know that Soraka is not really a good healer anymore, right? Not better than Sona. The fact is, you dont HAVE TO play agressive with Sona, its just so tempting. But if you level her W and only use mana for heals, she outheals Soraka. Its long over that Soraka was the best healer my poor horned girl Im trying to think of one reason to pick Soraka over Sona, but i cant find any. Only if the other side picks Sona in draft and you want sustain, any other case is obviously Sona. I think we would need a scaling on her passive, because 16 MR is not much lategame. Soraka mid = legit Seriously, she is borderline broken against most mid lane settups. | ||
|
Flakes
United States3125 Posts
On November 28 2011 19:25 shinarit wrote: Im trying to think of one reason to pick Soraka over Sona, but i cant find any. Only if the other side picks Sona in draft and you want sustain, any other case is obviously Sona. She's still a great soft counter to karthus/fiddle, and I think running soraka bot with heavy mana-users instead of the usual AD is still under-explored (or forgotten, depending on how long you've been playing). | ||
Mondieu
Romania803 Posts
| ||
| ||
