• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:10
CET 19:10
KST 03:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !10Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Micro Lags When Playing SC2? When will we find out if there are more tournament
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1 RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14!
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA) BW General Discussion FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB QuarterFinals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] WB SEMIFINALS - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread 2025 POECurrency Christmas POE 2 Update 0.4.0 Curr 2025 IGGM Merry Christmas ARC Raiders Items Sale 2025 IGGM Christmas Diablo 4 Season 11 Items Sale 2025 IGGM Monopoly Go Christmas Sale
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread How Does UI/UX Design Influence User Trust? US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
The (Hidden) Drug Problem in…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1382 users

Healthcare Reform in the US - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 61 62 63 Next
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 15 2009 14:22 GMT
#21
On August 15 2009 23:14 sdpgposd wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:07 Aegraen wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:49 sdpgposd wrote:
fox news is bought and paid for by pharmaceutical companies so dont listen to a word they say

edit: on pretty much anything actually.


Do you actually know that the major Pharma companies like Pfizer is actually siding with the Goverment in hopes of creating a monopoly (This is called crony capitalism).

http://www.pfizer.com/about/leadership_and_structure/econ_club_chicago_020909_jk.jsp

Please, learn what you are talking about before shoving your foot in your mouth.

Oh, guess what the AMA supports it also.

http://www.healthcentral.com/alzheimers/news-293988-98.html



Naw, this can't be, all the doctors and Pharma corps must be opposing the Healthcare bill?! Geeze. Such sheeps.


Fox news is essentially propaganda. I said nothing else. Do you think otherwise? lol


I'm not sure you understand the difference between Journalism and commentary. We can all agree each news organization (MSNBC, CNN, Fox, etc.) are quite partisan and have shows that cater to each segment of the population, but that is just it, commentary. Hannity, Beck, etc. aren't the ones doing the investigative journalism, they are commentators.

While I hardly watch Fox, except for Beck and occassionaly Hannity, they are by far the most balanced in terms of Journalism. If you want evidence proving this point just look at the Presidential race. In any event, none of the news organizations do an adequate job and the best reporting is done on the internet in blogs and various small organizations. That is where I get most of my information.

In summation, no Fox isn't primarily propaganda. Hell at least there is ONE right-leaning news organization, without them there wouldn't be any, and you can agree that would make the current situation far, far worse.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Woyn
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United Kingdom1628 Posts
August 15 2009 14:22 GMT
#22
ParasitJonte
Profile Joined September 2004
Sweden1768 Posts
August 15 2009 14:25 GMT
#23
On August 15 2009 23:15 Jusciax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind.

And what boggles my mind is that you prefer trusting your life and limb to corporations, which sole goal is to earn money to its shareholders (and in this case - signing as many people as possible and dropping them as soon as they get sick). Sure goverment doesn't do its job perfectly but atleast it's priorities are in right place - people.


And would you also wish that restaurants where run by the government? After all, private restaurants only find the cheapest, most disgusting pieces of meat they can find, serve them raw (heating costs money) and spit in your face when you're done eating.

Right?

Why do you think bureaucracy somehow would lead to better treatment of individuals? Why would you trust competition and the free market in almost every other area but not this one? Do you think people in the government are some sort of angels? Their priorities lie in themselves. They are people you pay to do a job for you to support them; just like you pay any company for their services. And as you said, government is inefficient, then why hire them!?
Hello=)
ParasitJonte
Profile Joined September 2004
Sweden1768 Posts
August 15 2009 14:36 GMT
#24
On August 15 2009 23:18 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:11 ParasitJonte wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:05 Boblion wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 ParasitJonte wrote:
The key point is that Swedes just wouldn't accept if someone who's rich can get better care than someone who's poor. Personally I think that's hypocritical because we allow just that when it comes to almost every other aspect of life. But it's the sort of subtle hypocrisy that people can live with, because it's about life and death.

Maybe you are the hypocrite ?


Oh please, do explain.

Healthcare =/= buying goods ?

In some European countries healthcare is considered as a right for even the poor people. Having a M3 or a pool isn't.


I would prefer using the term "buing services". And I don't really see the difference. Of course, a lot of things are considered a "right" in wealthy nations. Food, for example. That doesn't mean that we don't buy food from private corporations. And yes, people with more money can buy better and more food (though they still have to wait in line at the cashier I guess...).

Like I said, personally, I think it's hypocritical, based on how I reason.
Hello=)
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43351 Posts
August 15 2009 14:38 GMT
#25
On August 15 2009 23:22 Woyn wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zt9nGAWiKM

That might be the most coherent thing I've ever seen him say. If he's actually like that I see why he was deputy PM, as opposed to just being a joke figure who eats excessive pies, drives excessive jags and has excessive affairs. My respect for him just went up a lot.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
August 15 2009 14:39 GMT
#26
On August 15 2009 23:25 ParasitJonte wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:15 Jusciax wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind.

And what boggles my mind is that you prefer trusting your life and limb to corporations, which sole goal is to earn money to its shareholders (and in this case - signing as many people as possible and dropping them as soon as they get sick). Sure goverment doesn't do its job perfectly but atleast it's priorities are in right place - people.


And would you also wish that restaurants where run by the government? After all, private restaurants only find the cheapest, most disgusting pieces of meat they can find, serve them raw (heating costs money) and spit in your face when you're done eating.

Right?

I'm eating at a public cantine for civil servants for 5 euros ( in fact 3,90 because i have reductions ) this month and it is >>>>>>>>>>> than any private restaurant < 15 euros.

For 5 euros you get a kebab + some chips here.

The public university restaurant @ 2,80 euros is cool too.
Way better than 10+ euros Mc Crap.


fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
psion0011
Profile Joined December 2008
Canada720 Posts
August 15 2009 14:40 GMT
#27
On August 15 2009 23:25 ParasitJonte wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:15 Jusciax wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind.

And what boggles my mind is that you prefer trusting your life and limb to corporations, which sole goal is to earn money to its shareholders (and in this case - signing as many people as possible and dropping them as soon as they get sick). Sure goverment doesn't do its job perfectly but atleast it's priorities are in right place - people.


And would you also wish that restaurants where run by the government? After all, private restaurants only find the cheapest, most disgusting pieces of meat they can find, serve them raw (heating costs money) and spit in your face when you're done eating.

Right?

Why do you think bureaucracy somehow would lead to better treatment of individuals? Why would you trust competition and the free market in almost every other area but not this one? Do you think people in the government are some sort of angels? Their priorities lie in themselves. They are people you pay to do a job for you to support them; just like you pay any company for their services. And as you said, government is inefficient, then why hire them!?

Hahaha I'm not sure what you're trying to say, but restaurant health standards and inspectors ARE government run, and yes, without them there'd be a lot more cases of unsanitary food being served.

So I guess you just proved the point you were trying to argue against?
pubbanana
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States3063 Posts
August 15 2009 14:42 GMT
#28
On August 15 2009 23:39 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:25 ParasitJonte wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:15 Jusciax wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind.

And what boggles my mind is that you prefer trusting your life and limb to corporations, which sole goal is to earn money to its shareholders (and in this case - signing as many people as possible and dropping them as soon as they get sick). Sure goverment doesn't do its job perfectly but atleast it's priorities are in right place - people.


And would you also wish that restaurants where run by the government? After all, private restaurants only find the cheapest, most disgusting pieces of meat they can find, serve them raw (heating costs money) and spit in your face when you're done eating.

Right?

I'm eating at a public cantine for civil servants for 5 euros ( in fact 3,90 because i have reductions ) this month and it is >>>>>>>>>>> than any private restaurant < 15 euros.

For 5 euros you get a kebab + some chips here.

The public university restaurant @ 2,80 euros is cool too.
Way better than 10+ euros Mc Crap.




Where do you work/go to school, exactly?

Wachet, stehet im Glauben, seid männlich und seid stark.
Alur
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Denmark3900 Posts
August 15 2009 14:43 GMT
#29
On August 15 2009 23:18 Boblion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:11 ParasitJonte wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:05 Boblion wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 ParasitJonte wrote:
The key point is that Swedes just wouldn't accept if someone who's rich can get better care than someone who's poor. Personally I think that's hypocritical because we allow just that when it comes to almost every other aspect of life. But it's the sort of subtle hypocrisy that people can live with, because it's about life and death.

Maybe you are the hypocrite ?


Oh please, do explain.

Healthcare =/= buying goods ?

In some European countries healthcare is considered as a right for even the poor people. Having a M3 or a pool isn't.


ParasitJonte has a point, healthcare is fundamentally very much like many other crafts, you pay for the expertise of the doctor and for the resources they use on helping you (whether through taxes or direct payment). It is only logical that those who are rich are able to get higher quality health care, it just isn't very romantic.
AKA No can Dazzle | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlTpX7z3Pok
TL+ Member
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
August 15 2009 14:43 GMT
#30
On August 15 2009 23:25 ParasitJonte wrote:
Why do you think bureaucracy somehow would lead to better treatment of individuals?

Gotcha. You are exactly right.
A National health service has LESS bureaucracy and that's why it's cheaper. Everyone is simply given the same standard of care, there's no forms to fill out no nothing. You go in... and you get you're care.

On August 15 2009 23:25 ParasitJonte wrote:
Why would you trust competition and the free market in almost every other area but not this one?
Healthcare is an exception. By letting health professionals prioritise what care is essential and what isn't, you get the best care possible for the money you put in.

Giving everyone the same thing brings the price down, stops confusion, helps the workforce get on with working and just allows Doctors to do their job of helping people the best they can, without being tied up.

Don't hate the player - Hate the game
Too_MuchZerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Finland2818 Posts
August 15 2009 14:44 GMT
#31
You can still take private sector medical treatment if you aren't happy how free healthcare does it.
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
August 15 2009 14:45 GMT
#32
On August 15 2009 23:38 Kwark wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:22 Woyn wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zt9nGAWiKM

That might be the most coherent thing I've ever seen him say. If he's actually like that I see why he was deputy PM, as opposed to just being a joke figure who eats excessive pies, drives excessive jags and has excessive affairs. My respect for him just went up a lot.

What he says is very sound.... he's still a moron though :p
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
RaGe
Profile Blog Joined July 2004
Belgium9949 Posts
August 15 2009 14:47 GMT
#33
On August 15 2009 22:56 ParasitJonte wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 22:11 RaGe wrote:
Rofl, comparing it to the UK health care system is retarded. Any european knows the UK has one of the worst health care systems there is.


Well fine, let's compare it to Sweden's or some other country then (anyone from Europe where they have a nationalised health care system should speak their opinion, I'm actually very interested but I don't know much except about my own country's).


Our health care system is working fine. We actually have lower queue's than European countries without a nationalized health care system.

The only problem with our health care system is people from other countries getting their treatment in Belgium cause their own health care sucks.
Moderatorsometimes I get intimidated by the size of my right testicle
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 15 2009 14:48 GMT
#34
On August 15 2009 23:44 Too_MuchZerg wrote:
You can still take private sector medical treatment if you aren't happy how free healthcare does it.


I'll be blunt. You have no idea what you are talking about. If you want to inform yourself, read the bill yourself which I linked to.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Charlespeirce
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States46 Posts
August 15 2009 14:49 GMT
#35
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind. I'm also quite sure, none of you have either skimmed, nor read the Congressional bill being campaigned for by our oh so beneficent masters up on Capital Hill. (Which, by the way most of America is vehemently opposed to)

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews2.cfm?ID=1727
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1722

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/32_favor_single_payer_health_care_57_oppose

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/support_for_congressional_health_care_reform_falls_to_new_low

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues


This is all on the heels of people actually reading what is being proposed. This isn't reform, this is a total overhaul of the system backed by a hugely bloated and inflated beaurocracy with incredible power never before seen in America, and one in which will if passed essentially make the partisanship seen now a total laughingstock (Basically, the divide will be reminiscent of the mid 1800s). There is no Constitutionality in the first place for such a system.

Contrary to what the Media continues to try and tell you; propaganda by the way, America is still the most Conservative nation on this planet. We didn't vote for what we are getting. I've talked to many a democrat who voted for Obama and they are having serious buyers remorse. The people at the town halls, tea parties, and other various functions are not GOP, they come from all backgrounds: Democrats, Independents, Libertarians, and GOP.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/122333/Political-Ideology-Conservative-Label-Prevails-South.aspx

"The strength of "conservative" over "liberal" in the realm of political labels is vividly apparent in Gallup's state-level data, where a significantly higher percentage of Americans in most states -- even some solidly Democratic ones -- call themselves conservative rather than liberal."

[image loading]


[image loading]



What does this all mean? It means, that the majority of Americans do not want this. We are a representative constitutional republic. This means that our representatives cannot just do whatever the hell they want against their constituents and not face harsh and severe repercussions (As evidenced by prior US history).

Onto the meat and potatoes.

I'll start off by saying the measure of a countries average life expectancy is in no way indicative of their healthcare system. For one, it is a great fortune that most Americans live to 78 given that the majority of the country is overweight to obese. While the Japanese who live on average to be 82, have one of the lowest overweight populations of any country, and yet only net a 4 year gain. We all know the massive statistics in America on heart related deaths (Which is numbero uno). We have also seen a dramatic decrease every year in the percentage of fatalities, in no small part to our healthcare system.

You must measure the healthcare system on the basis of its treatment once at the facilities. John Stossel has a few good reports on the state of things. I don't think anyone here will argue the fact that the US has the greatest care recieved of any country. I think what many folks want to see is a reduction in the price of their care, not in a government takeover. Right now, the US healthcare system is in fact, heavily Government intervened, run, regulated, and co-opted by Trial lawyers who inflate prices heavily by frivolous suits and a no cap system on the maximum civil winnings.

I am truely curious. What innovations and breakthroughs have come out of a socialized healthcare system? Can you name even five in the last 100 years?

Ok, time for the actual bill.

http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

All 1,018 pages.

A quick overview of the pertinent parts:

• Page 16: States that if you have insurance at the time of the bill becoming law and change, you will be required to take a similar plan. If that is not available, you will be required to take the gov option!
• Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insure!
• Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed!
• Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process)
• Page 42: The "Health Choices Commissioner" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.
• Page 50: All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services.
• Page 58: Every person will be issued a National ID Healthcard.
• Page 59: The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer.
• Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (example: SEIU, UAW and ACORN)
• Page 72: All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange.
• Page 84: All private healthcare plans must participate in the Healthcare Exchange (i.e., total government control of private plans)
• Page 91: Government mandates linguistic infrastructure for services; translation: illegal aliens
• Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan.
• Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatically enrolled: you have no choice in the matter.
• Page 124: No company can sue the government for price-fixing. No "judicial review" is permitted against the government monopoly. Put simply, private insurers will be crushed.
• Page 127: The AMA sold doctors out: the government will set wages.
• Page 145: An employer MUST auto-enroll employees into the government-run public plan. No alternatives.
• Page 126: Employers MUST pay healthcare bills for part-time employees AND their families.
• Page 149: Any employer with a payroll of $400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays an 8% tax on payroll <>BR • Page 150: Any employer with a payroll of $250K-400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays a 2 to 6% tax on payroll
• Page 167: Any individual who doesnt' have acceptable healthcare (according to the government) will be taxed 2.5% of income.
• Page 170: Any NON-RESIDENT alien is exempt from individual taxes (Americans will pay for them).
• Page 195: Officers and employees of Government Healthcare Bureaucracy will have access to ALL American financial and personal records.
• Page 203: "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax." Yes, it really says that.
• Page 239: Bill will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors and the poor most affected."
• Page 241: Doctors: no matter what speciality you have, you'll all be paid the same (thanks, AMA!)
• Page 253: Government sets value of doctors' time, their professional judgment, etc.
• Page 265: Government mandates and controls productivity for private healthcare industries.
• Page 268: Government regulates rental and purchase of power-driven wheelchairs.
• Page 272: Cancer patients: welcome to the wonderful world of rationing!
• Page 280: Hospitals will be penalized for what the government deems preventable re-admissions.
• Page 298: Doctors: if you treat a patient during an initial admission that results in a readmission, you will be penalized by the government.
• Page 317: Doctors: you are now prohibited for owning and investing in healthcare companies!
• Page 318: Prohibition on hospital expansion. Hospitals cannot expand without government approval.
• Page 321: Hospital expansion hinges on "community" input: in other words, yet another payoff for ACORN.
• Page 335: Government mandates establishment of outcome-based measures: i.e., rationing.
• Page 341: Government has authority to disqualify Medicare Advantage Plans, HMOs, etc.
• Page 354: Government will restrict enrollment of SPECIAL NEEDS individuals.
• Page 379: More bureaucracy: Telehealth Advisory Committee (healthcare by phone).
• Page 425: More bureaucracy: Advance Care Planning Consult: Senior Citizens, assisted suicide, euthanasia?
• Page 425: Government will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. Mandatory. Appears to lock in estate taxes ahead of time.
• Page 425: Goverment provides approved list of end-of-life resources, guiding you in death.
• Page 427: Government mandates program that orders end-of-life treatment; government dictates how your life ends.
• Page 429: Advance Care Planning Consult will be used to dictate treatment as patient's health deteriorates. This can include an ORDER for end-of-life plans. An ORDER from the GOVERNMENT.
• Page 430: Government will decide what level of treatments you may have at end-of-life.
• Page 469: Community-based Home Medical Services: more payoffs for ACORN.
• Page 472: Payments to Community-based organizations: more payoffs for ACORN.
• Page 489: Government will cover marriage and family therapy. Government intervenes in your marriage.
• Page 494: Government will cover mental health services: defining, creating and rationing those services.



You can cross reference these yourselves by going to those pages and reading it for yourselves. What a wonderful and benevolent apparatchiks we have up on the hill. Why wouldn't anyone dare oppose such an efficient, humanizing system?!


Gee, did you copy and paste all of this from your 'white power' websites?

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=480480210

Consider what effects, that might conceivably have practical bearings, we conceive the object of our conception to have. Then, our conception of these effects is the whole of our conception of the object.
Too_MuchZerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Finland2818 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-15 14:55:06
August 15 2009 14:53 GMT
#36
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Healthcare_in_Finland

"Finland's health care services are more highly socialized than the European average. The quality of service in Finnish health care is considered to be good and according to a survey published by the European Commission in 2000, Finland has the highest number of people satisfied with their hospital care system in the EU: 88% of Finnish respondents were satisfied compared with the EU average of 41.3%.[2] Finnish health care expenditures are below the European average."

Its not devils system if it works, though USA it might be too big because so many people and how they legalize it.
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
August 15 2009 14:55 GMT
#37
On August 15 2009 23:42 pubbanana wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:39 Boblion wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:25 ParasitJonte wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:15 Jusciax wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind.

And what boggles my mind is that you prefer trusting your life and limb to corporations, which sole goal is to earn money to its shareholders (and in this case - signing as many people as possible and dropping them as soon as they get sick). Sure goverment doesn't do its job perfectly but atleast it's priorities are in right place - people.


And would you also wish that restaurants where run by the government? After all, private restaurants only find the cheapest, most disgusting pieces of meat they can find, serve them raw (heating costs money) and spit in your face when you're done eating.

Right?

I'm eating at a public cantine for civil servants for 5 euros ( in fact 3,90 because i have reductions ) this month and it is >>>>>>>>>>> than any private restaurant < 15 euros.

For 5 euros you get a kebab + some chips here.

The public university restaurant @ 2,80 euros is cool too.
Way better than 10+ euros Mc Crap.




Where do you work/go to school, exactly?


I have a shitty summer work ( one month ) in a public administration ( in Toulouse ) and i get access to the cantine of civil servants for this period. It usually cost 5 euros but because i'm in the lowest category of civil servants i get a reduction to 3,90.
This is by far the best puclic restaurant i have ever been. Of course if you want real gastronomy you will go to private 20+ euros restaurant. But for 3,90 it is awesome ( but you have to be a civil servant :o )

My lunch at uni ( in Toulouse too ) is 2,80 euros. It is some sort of cantine too and although it is not as good than the civil servant cantine it is even cheaper and decent ( And better than having a sandwich or a Kebab + a drink for 5 euros ).

I think the price is the same in all the unis in France.

Of course you will tell me that those restaurants are highly state/city-subsidized and you are right because... their are owned by the State / city.

But the point i was making is that they offer uber cheap and decent food.

Actually my personal experience of public cantines is:
middle school cantine < highschool cantine ( although my second highschool cantine was better than my first ) <<<< university cantine <<<<< civil servant cantine of of my city.
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
Aegraen
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1225 Posts
August 15 2009 14:56 GMT
#38
On August 15 2009 23:49 Charlespeirce wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 22:56 Aegraen wrote:
I still have no idea why people think more Government intervention especially wielding such incredible and unscrupulous power over their life and limb is a good idea. It really does boggle the mind. I'm also quite sure, none of you have either skimmed, nor read the Congressional bill being campaigned for by our oh so beneficent masters up on Capital Hill. (Which, by the way most of America is vehemently opposed to)

http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews2.cfm?ID=1727
http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.cfm?ID=1722

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/32_favor_single_payer_health_care_57_oppose

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2009/support_for_congressional_health_care_reform_falls_to_new_low

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/trust_on_issues


This is all on the heels of people actually reading what is being proposed. This isn't reform, this is a total overhaul of the system backed by a hugely bloated and inflated beaurocracy with incredible power never before seen in America, and one in which will if passed essentially make the partisanship seen now a total laughingstock (Basically, the divide will be reminiscent of the mid 1800s). There is no Constitutionality in the first place for such a system.

Contrary to what the Media continues to try and tell you; propaganda by the way, America is still the most Conservative nation on this planet. We didn't vote for what we are getting. I've talked to many a democrat who voted for Obama and they are having serious buyers remorse. The people at the town halls, tea parties, and other various functions are not GOP, they come from all backgrounds: Democrats, Independents, Libertarians, and GOP.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/122333/Political-Ideology-Conservative-Label-Prevails-South.aspx

"The strength of "conservative" over "liberal" in the realm of political labels is vividly apparent in Gallup's state-level data, where a significantly higher percentage of Americans in most states -- even some solidly Democratic ones -- call themselves conservative rather than liberal."

[image loading]


[image loading]



What does this all mean? It means, that the majority of Americans do not want this. We are a representative constitutional republic. This means that our representatives cannot just do whatever the hell they want against their constituents and not face harsh and severe repercussions (As evidenced by prior US history).

Onto the meat and potatoes.

I'll start off by saying the measure of a countries average life expectancy is in no way indicative of their healthcare system. For one, it is a great fortune that most Americans live to 78 given that the majority of the country is overweight to obese. While the Japanese who live on average to be 82, have one of the lowest overweight populations of any country, and yet only net a 4 year gain. We all know the massive statistics in America on heart related deaths (Which is numbero uno). We have also seen a dramatic decrease every year in the percentage of fatalities, in no small part to our healthcare system.

You must measure the healthcare system on the basis of its treatment once at the facilities. John Stossel has a few good reports on the state of things. I don't think anyone here will argue the fact that the US has the greatest care recieved of any country. I think what many folks want to see is a reduction in the price of their care, not in a government takeover. Right now, the US healthcare system is in fact, heavily Government intervened, run, regulated, and co-opted by Trial lawyers who inflate prices heavily by frivolous suits and a no cap system on the maximum civil winnings.

I am truely curious. What innovations and breakthroughs have come out of a socialized healthcare system? Can you name even five in the last 100 years?

Ok, time for the actual bill.

http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

All 1,018 pages.

A quick overview of the pertinent parts:

• Page 16: States that if you have insurance at the time of the bill becoming law and change, you will be required to take a similar plan. If that is not available, you will be required to take the gov option!
• Page 22: Mandates audits of all employers that self-insure!
• Page 29: Admission: your health care will be rationed!
• Page 30: A government committee will decide what treatments and benefits you get (and, unlike an insurer, there will be no appeals process)
• Page 42: The "Health Choices Commissioner" will decide health benefits for you. You will have no choice. None.
• Page 50: All non-US citizens, illegal or not, will be provided with free healthcare services.
• Page 58: Every person will be issued a National ID Healthcard.
• Page 59: The federal government will have direct, real-time access to all individual bank accounts for electronic funds transfer.
• Page 65: Taxpayers will subsidize all union retiree and community organizer health plans (example: SEIU, UAW and ACORN)
• Page 72: All private healthcare plans must conform to government rules to participate in a Healthcare Exchange.
• Page 84: All private healthcare plans must participate in the Healthcare Exchange (i.e., total government control of private plans)
• Page 91: Government mandates linguistic infrastructure for services; translation: illegal aliens
• Page 95: The Government will pay ACORN and Americorps to sign up individuals for Government-run Health Care plan.
• Page 102: Those eligible for Medicaid will be automatically enrolled: you have no choice in the matter.
• Page 124: No company can sue the government for price-fixing. No "judicial review" is permitted against the government monopoly. Put simply, private insurers will be crushed.
• Page 127: The AMA sold doctors out: the government will set wages.
• Page 145: An employer MUST auto-enroll employees into the government-run public plan. No alternatives.
• Page 126: Employers MUST pay healthcare bills for part-time employees AND their families.
• Page 149: Any employer with a payroll of $400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays an 8% tax on payroll <>BR • Page 150: Any employer with a payroll of $250K-400K or more, who does not offer the public option, pays a 2 to 6% tax on payroll
• Page 167: Any individual who doesnt' have acceptable healthcare (according to the government) will be taxed 2.5% of income.
• Page 170: Any NON-RESIDENT alien is exempt from individual taxes (Americans will pay for them).
• Page 195: Officers and employees of Government Healthcare Bureaucracy will have access to ALL American financial and personal records.
• Page 203: "The tax imposed under this section shall not be treated as tax." Yes, it really says that.
• Page 239: Bill will reduce physician services for Medicaid. Seniors and the poor most affected."
• Page 241: Doctors: no matter what speciality you have, you'll all be paid the same (thanks, AMA!)
• Page 253: Government sets value of doctors' time, their professional judgment, etc.
• Page 265: Government mandates and controls productivity for private healthcare industries.
• Page 268: Government regulates rental and purchase of power-driven wheelchairs.
• Page 272: Cancer patients: welcome to the wonderful world of rationing!
• Page 280: Hospitals will be penalized for what the government deems preventable re-admissions.
• Page 298: Doctors: if you treat a patient during an initial admission that results in a readmission, you will be penalized by the government.
• Page 317: Doctors: you are now prohibited for owning and investing in healthcare companies!
• Page 318: Prohibition on hospital expansion. Hospitals cannot expand without government approval.
• Page 321: Hospital expansion hinges on "community" input: in other words, yet another payoff for ACORN.
• Page 335: Government mandates establishment of outcome-based measures: i.e., rationing.
• Page 341: Government has authority to disqualify Medicare Advantage Plans, HMOs, etc.
• Page 354: Government will restrict enrollment of SPECIAL NEEDS individuals.
• Page 379: More bureaucracy: Telehealth Advisory Committee (healthcare by phone).
• Page 425: More bureaucracy: Advance Care Planning Consult: Senior Citizens, assisted suicide, euthanasia?
• Page 425: Government will instruct and consult regarding living wills, durable powers of attorney, etc. Mandatory. Appears to lock in estate taxes ahead of time.
• Page 425: Goverment provides approved list of end-of-life resources, guiding you in death.
• Page 427: Government mandates program that orders end-of-life treatment; government dictates how your life ends.
• Page 429: Advance Care Planning Consult will be used to dictate treatment as patient's health deteriorates. This can include an ORDER for end-of-life plans. An ORDER from the GOVERNMENT.
• Page 430: Government will decide what level of treatments you may have at end-of-life.
• Page 469: Community-based Home Medical Services: more payoffs for ACORN.
• Page 472: Payments to Community-based organizations: more payoffs for ACORN.
• Page 489: Government will cover marriage and family therapy. Government intervenes in your marriage.
• Page 494: Government will cover mental health services: defining, creating and rationing those services.



You can cross reference these yourselves by going to those pages and reading it for yourselves. What a wonderful and benevolent apparatchiks we have up on the hill. Why wouldn't anyone dare oppose such an efficient, humanizing system?!


Gee, did you copy and paste all of this from your 'white power' websites?

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=480480210



Actually, after cross-referencing the specific points, I pasted the pertinent parts that you see, that are indeed facts (Read it yourself), from:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2300451/posts

Are you going to dispute any of these facts? Care to try to, when I can paste the parts for every one right from the bill itself.

Oh, hey, forgot about this:

Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

Another Alinsky radical coming out of the woodwork.
"It is easy to be conspicuously 'compassionate' if others are being forced to pay the cost." -- Murray N. Rothbard -- Rand Paul 2010 -- Ron Paul 2012
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
August 15 2009 14:57 GMT
#39
On August 15 2009 23:48 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:44 Too_MuchZerg wrote:
You can still take private sector medical treatment if you aren't happy how free healthcare does it.


I'll be blunt. You have no idea what you are talking about. If you want to inform yourself, read the bill yourself which I linked to.

? What are you talking about.
Of course you can still have private care, there will just be a public care option that runs alongside it.
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
Boblion
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
France8043 Posts
August 15 2009 14:59 GMT
#40
On August 15 2009 23:43 Alur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 15 2009 23:18 Boblion wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:11 ParasitJonte wrote:
On August 15 2009 23:05 Boblion wrote:
On August 15 2009 22:56 ParasitJonte wrote:
The key point is that Swedes just wouldn't accept if someone who's rich can get better care than someone who's poor. Personally I think that's hypocritical because we allow just that when it comes to almost every other aspect of life. But it's the sort of subtle hypocrisy that people can live with, because it's about life and death.

Maybe you are the hypocrite ?


Oh please, do explain.

Healthcare =/= buying goods ?

In some European countries healthcare is considered as a right for even the poor people. Having a M3 or a pool isn't.


ParasitJonte has a point, healthcare is fundamentally very much like many other crafts, you pay for the expertise of the doctor and for the resources they use on helping you (whether through taxes or direct payment). It is only logical that those who are rich are able to get higher quality health care, it just isn't very romantic.

The point is that public healthcare was created in most of the European countries because it is a RIGHT for people.
However both you and ParasitJonte are hypocrites because there are also private clinics in the same countries and rich people are free to use those services.
They can even get to another country and pay for healthcare if they don't like public hospitals.

So i don't understand what is your problem. You don't want to pay for the healthcare of poor people ?
fuck all those elitists brb watching streams of elite players.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 61 62 63 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Invitational
12:00
Christmas Day Games
Solar vs ClassicLIVE!
TBD vs herO
WardiTV1908
TaKeTV 632
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech139
trigger 76
BRAT_OK 70
MindelVK 10
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 30088
Shuttle 601
Larva 524
Aegong 477
firebathero 230
Mini 159
Dewaltoss 156
ggaemo 81
Hyun 67
Sexy 31
[ Show more ]
soO 21
910 14
HiyA 9
Dota 2
420jenkins1206
Other Games
singsing2205
DeMusliM490
crisheroes372
ArmadaUGS268
Mew2King121
Beastyqt88
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick747
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 24
• Adnapsc2 15
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 36
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4684
Other Games
• Shiphtur259
• imaqtpie25
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
22h 50m
Elazer vs Nicoract
Reynor vs Scarlett
Replay Cast
1d 5h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Krystianer vs TBD
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs TBD
ByuN vs Nicoract
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.