|
On December 07 2008 07:28 fusionsdf wrote: they should actually do news and not entertainment
that's the whole problem with the media.... and i wrote a 4000 word essay specifically on this problem for a university project lol
|
|
sorry to keep foisting our boring canadian politics on TL 
anyways the latest news is that bob rae has pulled out of the liberal leadership race, so michael ignatieff is now the new liberal leader. interesting development imo, i was cheering for rae but what can you do
PS: oh forgot to mention, dion resigned on monday, so now that ignatieff is the new leader he will officially replace dion as leader of the liberal party on wednesday
|
Ignatieff is smart, now they just need to throw Dion infront of a bus!
|
Canada9720 Posts
it's funny that rae pulled out, cause just last night he was calling for the "liberal elite" to choose the leader
lmao
|
On December 10 2008 01:08 a-game wrote:sorry to keep foisting our boring canadian politics on TL  anyways the latest news is that bob rae has pulled out of the liberal leadership race, so michael ignatieff is now the new liberal leader. interesting development imo, i was cheering for rae but what can you do PS: oh forgot to mention, dion resigned on monday, so now that ignatieff is the new leader he will officially replace dion as leader of the liberal party on wednesday
oh shit that's quite a huge development....
wonder what's gonna go down next..
|
On December 10 2008 02:16 CTStalker wrote: it's funny that rae pulled out, cause just last night he was calling for the "liberal elite" to choose the leader
lmao hmm you sure? that doesn't sound right
rae had been pushing for the liberals to choose their leader through giving every liberal party member a vote. the party brass rejected the idea and last night decided the leader would be decided by 700 or so party elites.
rae knew that his only hope for the leadership was to appeal to the grassroots of the party; once it was confirmed that the grassroots weren't going to have a say, he conceded his bid
|
^ i thought 800?
meh just a number who cares lol
|
|
On December 10 2008 02:17 karbon wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2008 01:08 a-game wrote:sorry to keep foisting our boring canadian politics on TL  anyways the latest news is that bob rae has pulled out of the liberal leadership race, so michael ignatieff is now the new liberal leader. interesting development imo, i was cheering for rae but what can you do PS: oh forgot to mention, dion resigned on monday, so now that ignatieff is the new leader he will officially replace dion as leader of the liberal party on wednesday oh shit that's quite a huge development.... wonder what's gonna go down next.. 
This makes me happy.
Ignatieff has been a critic of the way this coalition was formed and the way the Bloc has been used to prop it up. If anything, his leadership should bring some much needed 'sensibility' to the table.
In reading profiles, Ignatieff strikes me as much more of a 'modern' politician than we've typically seen in Canadian politics - where the only accepted currency is time spent in office (whether worthwhile or not). He's an academic, an intellectual. He has travelled the world and lived outside of our country. Call me an elitist, but I prefer someone who can bring an outside perspective to our small pond.
He's also a modern politician in that he opening acknowledges mistakes he has made in the past. He reserves the right to change his mind in a way that is not in the interest of fence-sitting and appeasing (ala Paul Martin), but as a realization that polticians are human and not infallible. Like the rest of the population, their opinions will grow and change as the information infront of them changes. There is nothing more frustrating than a politician holding on to an old view (knowing it is incorrect) because they see a changing mind as a character flaw.
Anyways, I'll have to read more about the guy and perhaps pick up a few of his books. Either way, it's interesting to get some bonefied intelligence back in the house.
Or maybe I'm biased since every time I learn of another well-travelled, intelligent, educated politician I think of Peter Lougheed, the pro-football player/lawyer/Harvard grad/best thing to ever happen to western politics.
|
Canada9720 Posts
On December 10 2008 02:23 a-game wrote:Show nested quote +On December 10 2008 02:16 CTStalker wrote: it's funny that rae pulled out, cause just last night he was calling for the "liberal elite" to choose the leader
lmao hmm you sure? that doesn't sound right rae had been pushing for the liberals to choose their leader through giving every liberal party member a vote. the party brass rejected the idea and last night decided the leader would be decided by 700 or so party elites. rae knew that his only hope for the leadership was to appeal to the grassroots of the party; once it was confirmed that the grassroots weren't going to have a say, he conceded his bid if it wasn't last night, it was fairly recently.
they were discussing it this morning on cbc radio 1
edit: sorry, your post was what i meant to write. but yeah, still a ridiculous suggestion to get the 800 people to choose the leader
|
Just read through the whole thread, and it's really interesting to see Canadians argue among eachother about politics. I'm just used to Canadians telling Americans they don't know what they're doing, so it's funny to see Canadians not ostensibly all in one big gang for once.
Anyway, Ignatieff is the new liberal party leader and doesn't fully support the coalition? Even so, isn't the coalition his best way to gain any power whatsoever? And the suspension of parliament, that means they can't form the coalition and oust Harper until atleast when the suspension is lifted?
|
Ignatieff hasn't said he's outright opposed to a coalition, or that he won't do it anyways (I don't think). But yeah, that would be the best way for them to get immediate power. The risk is that public opinion might not be on their side, which would result in losses for the Liberal party in the long run. And yes, that's precisely what the suspension of parliament is about.
|
Besides being annoying/delaying it, is the suspension really intended to stop them from going through with it? Won't they just, form the coalition and oust him as soon as the suspension is gone?
|
They could, yes. It seems Harper is after one of two things: either he hopes the coalition will fall apart in that time, or he will try to run a smear campaign and get public opinion on his side before his time runs out.
edit- In fact, some of the more conspiracy minded people out there suspect that the second option was Harper's plan all along, and that he engineered this situation so that next election his conservatives would get another shot at a majority government, rather than the weaker minority that they have right now.
|
Canada9720 Posts
in semi-unrelated news, ottawa's public transit workers are going on strike starting tonight.
this city is falling apart pretty fucking quickly
|
On December 10 2008 05:58 Nightmarjoo wrote: Besides being annoying/delaying it, is the suspension really intended to stop them from going through with it? Won't they just, form the coalition and oust him as soon as the suspension is gone?
it depends
basically the conservatives are going to try and use the time to sway public opinion against the coalition. The hope is that they start a massive public outrising, which will put pressure on the MPs, which will put pressure on the coalition.
Now coming back there are 2 possibilites. a)Governor general gives the coalition a chance to govern. If there is a lot of dissatisfaction with the coalition, the chances might go down a bit, but will still be pretty high.
b) call a new election. if Things go the Conservatives way, you have the double whammy of the coalition being extremely unpopular, and the election being blamed on the liberals/NDP leading to a Conservative Majority.
In order of probability (my view) it is most likely that: 1) Liberals under Ignatieff back down following some sort of budget compromise by harper 2) Liberals continue on, get chance to govern, last 12-18 months 3) Liberals continue on, new election called, Conservative majority 4) Liberals continue on, new election called, Conservative minority
|
I thought Dion was going to stay on board and lead the coalition if it succeeded?
|
This is good news. I never liked rae. Ignatieff will be good for the liberal party.
|
On December 10 2008 12:19 CTStalker wrote: in semi-unrelated news, ottawa's public transit workers are going on strike starting tonight.
this city is falling apart pretty fucking quickly Sensationalism is kinda fail mate.
|
|
|
|