• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 05:42
CET 11:42
KST 19:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns0[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 103SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1822Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises3Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Starcraft 2 Zerg Coach
Tourneys
uThermal 2v2 Circuit OSC Season 13 World Championship WardiTV Mondays $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays I would like to say something about StarCraft BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Empty tournaments section on Liquipedia A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SLON Grand Finals – Season 2
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! General RTS Discussion Thread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
Psychological Factors That D…
TrAiDoS
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
GOAT of Goats list
BisuDagger
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2273 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4590

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4588 4589 4590 4591 4592 5408 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Byo
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
Canada209 Posts
November 12 2024 21:06 GMT
#91781
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
November 12 2024 21:24 GMT
#91782
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great

I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do)

The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms.

Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition.

Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal.

I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values.

The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation.

Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person.

'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11699 Posts
November 12 2024 21:40 GMT
#91783
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great

I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do)

The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms.

Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition.

Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal.

I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values.

The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation.

Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person.



A related example to this is bitcoin. While not a stock, it still works quite similar. With the exception that it is more stupid.

Bitcoin doesn't do anything. It doesn't produce anything, and it doesn't serve any purpose. It is literally people wasting hardware and energy on completely useless calculations. It is completely based on Greater Fool ideas. And yet you can make a lot of money with it. Because, as it turns out, there are quite a lot of pretty Great Fools out there.

A market like the stock market or crypto stuff doesn't actually necessarily value stuff based on any real fundamental information about the thing being valued. It values stuff based on an estimate on how other people will value the same thing later.

Tesla is valued highly not because of anything that Tesla does, but because it has a weird hype, and even if that hype is stupid, so are a lot of people. Thus, even non-stupid people invest in it, because they expect stupid people to invest in it, too.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
November 12 2024 21:41 GMT
#91784
On November 13 2024 05:58 Impervious wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 03:20 WombaT wrote:
The one that blows my mind is Gaza. It’s a single issue, and you’ve got two realistic candidates. You care enough about the issue to vote for Trump, but not enough to check his positions and history?

Genuinely infuriating. I know people very much dislike GH’s position on this, but it’s not coming from a place of ‘I didn’t bother checking a candidate’s position on a topic I purport to be my electoral motivator’

Other more nebulous, or complicated stuff I’ve a bit more understanding. The more complicated, or ‘vibes’ it goes, the more and more policy and analysis you have to read to get some kinda real grasp on it. The average person isn’t going to do a deep dive comparison on Trump and Biden’s economic policies, the estimated impact of said policies versus worldwide economic shocks and America’s performance relative to roughly equivalent nations, or its own realistic projections. Even if someone would be willing to try, they’re highly likely to not have the understanding to actually do it. I know I wouldn’t

So you need good intermediary messaging. Otherwise ‘Hey I remember things were a bit better under Trump’ is gonna punch pretty hard.

I think there’s a bit of misunderstanding/misuse of ‘anti-establishment’. For me it crops up a lot, in actual usage it seems basically solely targeted towards the core, influential grandees of political parties, and especially the Democratic Party. Perhaps some cultural institutions like big, historic media outlets.

It doesn’t seem to stretch beyond that for many, or invoking it as a driving value doesn’t make much sense.

You can also look at this going back even further. Most people were generally better off under Obama compared to Trump. Then most people were generally better off under Bush compared to Obama. Then most people were generally better under Clinton compared to Bush. Etc. It goes all the way back to the 70's. Social mobility and the ability to achieve the American Dream, which was achievable by the previous generations, has declined pretty steadily since then. While a lot of things have improved, especially technologically since then, the average person has to work more and harder to achieve the same level of relative wealth, even though the average person right now is something like 4x as productive in each hour of work as they were in the 70's. Meanwhile the USA has had unprecedented growth in total wealth in that same period of time.

Logically, we have over 50 years of data showing that trickle down economics, which was one of the biggest changes from that time that can be attributed to this decline, isn't really helping the majority of people. Neither party seems to be competent enough to do anything about this, so I fully expect that in 4 years, the majority of people are going to look back and think that we were better under Biden compared to this 2nd Trump presidency. But the stock market is likely going to be at record highs yet again.....

These observations exist in a relatively rare space, where they’re actually inarguable, to me. If someone wishes to claim the contrary they either haven’t looked at what I’ve looked at, or they have and can’t read the numbers.

Maybe there’s one very specific niche somewhere, but in terms of direction of overall travel I’ve never seen data to the contrary. And I’ve looked at quite a lot.

From my time in retail, chatting to one of the oldies, guy bought a house with his pregnant wife on a single retail worker income back in the day. And then supported his growing family as the single wage moving forwards. Northern Ireland has lower house prices, even factoring for relatively lower wages than many areas of the UK, and many areas of the Republic of Ireland. Even with that, what he did is just outright not possible here unless you life like a monk. In those other areas, living like a monk isn’t sufficient, it’s just outright impossible.

My partner’s sister is a doctor down in Dublin, 3 years in to graduating and working. Still house sharing with some college buddies because they can’t afford to rent solo, much less actually buy.

My parents had free university, I do not. To take another example
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
November 12 2024 21:55 GMT
#91785
On November 13 2024 06:40 Simberto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote:
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great

I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do)

The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms.

Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition.

Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal.

I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values.

The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation.

Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person.



A related example to this is bitcoin. While not a stock, it still works quite similar. With the exception that it is more stupid.

Bitcoin doesn't do anything. It doesn't produce anything, and it doesn't serve any purpose. It is literally people wasting hardware and energy on completely useless calculations. It is completely based on Greater Fool ideas. And yet you can make a lot of money with it. Because, as it turns out, there are quite a lot of pretty Great Fools out there.

A market like the stock market or crypto stuff doesn't actually necessarily value stuff based on any real fundamental information about the thing being valued. It values stuff based on an estimate on how other people will value the same thing later.

Tesla is valued highly not because of anything that Tesla does, but because it has a weird hype, and even if that hype is stupid, so are a lot of people. Thus, even non-stupid people invest in it, because they expect stupid people to invest in it, too.

I know a fellow, indeed a good friend who basically went completely mental and spent all his savings on BitCoin. He just got lucky on the timing. He did these trades while unwell enough to be forcibly institutionalised for his mental health.

We do have some fun joshing about it, from my end any investment in a time of psychosis probably not being all that sensible and you fluked it. He’ll make fun of me for even in psychosis not having any balls

The frustrating part to me about crypto is it’s just the new Tulip bubble. The actual interesting applications of the tech are entirely subsumed by the speculative market

For example, the fundamental tech does enable something like very small micro transactions with no overhead.

So it does theoretically enable content delivery mechanisms that charge minute amounts on like, how much of an article you read, or a video you watch.

I thought that was interesting because you could have a content delivery model that isn’t say, per click, and you’d incentivise decent, engaging content.

But crypto enthusiasts just abandoned this kind of interesting application to horse trade
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
KT_Elwood
Profile Joined July 2015
Germany1097 Posts
November 12 2024 22:08 GMT
#91786
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great



In essence It's the world's biggest pyramid sheme and is long disconnected from the purpose of allowing investors to finance innovative or bold companies.

Tesla is supposed to be worth more than the sum of all other car manufacturers.

It's not. ELon is loved by boomers who like people hair implants and leather jackets





"First he eats our dogs, and then he taxes the penguins... Donald Trump truly is the Donald Trump of our generation. " -DPB
Elroi
Profile Joined August 2009
Sweden5599 Posts
November 12 2024 22:27 GMT
#91787
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great

I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do)

The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms.

Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition.

Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal.

I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values.

The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation.

Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person.


Theranos wasn't listed on the stock market, though. The founder was just extremely charismatic and forged her results, which managed to deceive some very rich investors. Besides, Tesla already has a very strong product that sells like water in the desert so that's not really comparable.

Is Tesla worth 1 trillion dollars? That, I have no idea about.
"To all eSports fans, I want to be remembered as a progamer who can make something out of nothing, and someone who always does his best. I think that is the right way of living, and I'm always doing my best to follow that." - Jaedong. /watch?v=jfghAzJqAp0
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria4478 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-11-12 23:58:53
November 12 2024 23:57 GMT
#91788
On November 13 2024 07:27 Elroi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote:
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great

I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do)

The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms.

Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition.

Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal.

I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values.

The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation.

Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person.


Theranos wasn't listed on the stock market, though. The founder was just extremely charismatic and forged her results, which managed to deceive some very rich investors. Besides, Tesla already has a very strong product that sells like water in the desert so that's not really comparable.

Is Tesla worth 1 trillion dollars? That, I have no idea about.


Twitter also went private under Elon Musk. Nobody knows its value. Sounds familiar?

And yes, I'm aware you were talking about Tesla. I'm just doing my thing defaming Elon Musk.
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
November 13 2024 00:01 GMT
#91789
On November 13 2024 07:27 Elroi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote:
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote:
Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great

I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do)

The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms.

Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition.

Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal.

I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values.

The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation.

Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person.


Theranos wasn't listed on the stock market, though. The founder was just extremely charismatic and forged her results, which managed to deceive some very rich investors. Besides, Tesla already has a very strong product that sells like water in the desert so that's not really comparable.

Is Tesla worth 1 trillion dollars? That, I have no idea about.

Appreciate the technical correction, although I don’t think it really defangs my wider point
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Sadist
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States7300 Posts
November 13 2024 00:30 GMT
#91790
Teslas stock price increasing is bizarre

They have more competition than ever, in fact every day going forward should be tougher for them than the last. More automakers have EVs than ever before.

I have to think Elons behavior is a turn off for some of his target market. I would have thought liberals were the majority of early adopters, i would imagine liberals are getting sick of his courting of MAGA.

It feels like a huge meme stock.


How do you go from where you are to where you want to be? I think you have to have an enthusiasm for life. You have to have a dream, a goal and you have to be willing to work for it. Jim Valvano
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4212 Posts
November 13 2024 00:34 GMT
#91791
On November 13 2024 06:41 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 05:58 Impervious wrote:
On November 13 2024 03:20 WombaT wrote:
The one that blows my mind is Gaza. It’s a single issue, and you’ve got two realistic candidates. You care enough about the issue to vote for Trump, but not enough to check his positions and history?

Genuinely infuriating. I know people very much dislike GH’s position on this, but it’s not coming from a place of ‘I didn’t bother checking a candidate’s position on a topic I purport to be my electoral motivator’

Other more nebulous, or complicated stuff I’ve a bit more understanding. The more complicated, or ‘vibes’ it goes, the more and more policy and analysis you have to read to get some kinda real grasp on it. The average person isn’t going to do a deep dive comparison on Trump and Biden’s economic policies, the estimated impact of said policies versus worldwide economic shocks and America’s performance relative to roughly equivalent nations, or its own realistic projections. Even if someone would be willing to try, they’re highly likely to not have the understanding to actually do it. I know I wouldn’t

So you need good intermediary messaging. Otherwise ‘Hey I remember things were a bit better under Trump’ is gonna punch pretty hard.

I think there’s a bit of misunderstanding/misuse of ‘anti-establishment’. For me it crops up a lot, in actual usage it seems basically solely targeted towards the core, influential grandees of political parties, and especially the Democratic Party. Perhaps some cultural institutions like big, historic media outlets.

It doesn’t seem to stretch beyond that for many, or invoking it as a driving value doesn’t make much sense.

You can also look at this going back even further. Most people were generally better off under Obama compared to Trump. Then most people were generally better off under Bush compared to Obama. Then most people were generally better under Clinton compared to Bush. Etc. It goes all the way back to the 70's. Social mobility and the ability to achieve the American Dream, which was achievable by the previous generations, has declined pretty steadily since then. While a lot of things have improved, especially technologically since then, the average person has to work more and harder to achieve the same level of relative wealth, even though the average person right now is something like 4x as productive in each hour of work as they were in the 70's. Meanwhile the USA has had unprecedented growth in total wealth in that same period of time.

Logically, we have over 50 years of data showing that trickle down economics, which was one of the biggest changes from that time that can be attributed to this decline, isn't really helping the majority of people. Neither party seems to be competent enough to do anything about this, so I fully expect that in 4 years, the majority of people are going to look back and think that we were better under Biden compared to this 2nd Trump presidency. But the stock market is likely going to be at record highs yet again.....

These observations exist in a relatively rare space, where they’re actually inarguable, to me. If someone wishes to claim the contrary they either haven’t looked at what I’ve looked at, or they have and can’t read the numbers.

Maybe there’s one very specific niche somewhere, but in terms of direction of overall travel I’ve never seen data to the contrary. And I’ve looked at quite a lot.

From my time in retail, chatting to one of the oldies, guy bought a house with his pregnant wife on a single retail worker income back in the day. And then supported his growing family as the single wage moving forwards. Northern Ireland has lower house prices, even factoring for relatively lower wages than many areas of the UK, and many areas of the Republic of Ireland. Even with that, what he did is just outright not possible here unless you life like a monk. In those other areas, living like a monk isn’t sufficient, it’s just outright impossible.

My partner’s sister is a doctor down in Dublin, 3 years in to graduating and working. Still house sharing with some college buddies because they can’t afford to rent solo, much less actually buy.

My parents had free university, I do not. To take another example

As an aside, I'm Canadian, however, our economy is so tightly tied to the US economy that we have very similar trends overall.

I agree that these observations are inarguable. There's so much data to back it up..... There are definitely some legitimate counter-points I've seen, but the overwhelming amount of data out there supports the conclusion that things have been getting steadily worse for the median person for the last 50 years. This goes all the way to now an increase in infant mortality rates and lower life expectancy.

Regarding how much things have changed, I can give you an example from my side of the pond too. The general financial advice that my parents grew up with and shared with me when I was younger was to spend ~25% of your after-tax income on your house, whether that is in rent or ideally a mortgage. This also included repairs, utilities, etc. Spend ~25% on your car(s). This included the payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, etc. Spend ~25% on food, hobbies, vacations, etc as essential and discretionary spending. Finally, put the remaining ~25% into paying off outstanding debts, and if you're out of debt put it towards savings and investments to fund your retirement.

That was considered good advice at the time. Good luck doing that nowadays.

My parents accomplished this, or at least did early on, and by their late 20's had purchased their first home (a small townhome), which they upgraded a few years later using built up equity (a small 3 bedroom duplex) and upgraded again a few years later using more built up equity to buy a pretty nice house with 6 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2 kitchens, a big garage and a couple of acres of decent property (it did need some repairs admittedly, and we definitely put in some sweat equity for it). My mother was a stay at home mom for most of my childhood and my siblings childhoods. My parents were even able to put money into education for me and my siblings. My father did this without a degree, and my mother has a college degree (think more like community college or technical college, as Canada has two different types of post-secondary education in a college system and a university system) that she basically didn't use for more than a couple of years before I was born, and then again about 20 years later. Neither were particularly well educated. Things kinda went sideways because cancer is a bitch, but it's absolutely incredible and infuriating to see how different things are compared to a generation ago, and yet when you look at the economic data available from ~25 years ago and compare it with ~50 years ago, it's about as drastic of a difference between those times too. The struggles we have right now are just a continuation of ~50 years of things getting worse.....

Similar to your partner's sister, we've got struggles affording a place here too. My girlfriend and I have been looking into finally buying a house ourselves, we're in our late 30's, we're both finally doing well financially, and yet we already resigned ourselves to moving out of the city I've been in for the last 16 years and she grew up in because we simply can't afford it now..... Everything either doesn't meet our requirements for even a basic starter home (we both work from home so we basically just need some office space in addition to our bedroom, I want a 2nd bathroom so that if I need to do any renos we still have one that can be functional, and I want a garage or space to add a garage as I used to work on cars and still have the tools for it, so while it would be expensive I could use it to save a bunch of money in the long run), or if it does meet our requirements, it would stretch our budget and leave us house-poor in the process.

As much as I'd love another housing price crash from a selfish/personal perspective, it would absolutely screw both my mother and my girlfriend's parents, as they are both partially relying on equity to fund their retirements, so a crash would likely screw us in a different way. And last time there was a crash, it kinda affected the industry I currently work in (aerospace).....

By all reasonable metrics, the USA did extremely well under Biden over the last 4 years relative to other countries. I would have loved to have both the inflation rate and the GDP percentage growth that the US had compared to us here in Canada, for instance..... To me, it's shocking that the messaging was so awful. While the status quo sucks and the dems were pushing policy that was pretty much just the status quo, Trump's policies and the republican policies seem worse..... All I can say is that it looks like this election was more about emotion than anything else. Things suck right now for most people, and the republicans were able to channel the associated anger and fear better.
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
November 13 2024 00:36 GMT
#91792
On November 13 2024 09:30 Sadist wrote:
Teslas stock price increasing is bizarre

They have more competition than ever, in fact every day going forward should be tougher for them than the last. More automakers have EVs than ever before.

I have to think Elons behavior is a turn off for some of his target market. I would have thought liberals were the majority of early adopters, i would imagine liberals are getting sick of his courting of MAGA.

It feels like a huge meme stock.



It’s a nonsense validation given Tesla don’t have too many exclusive patents that prevent someone else just copying them

They’ve also been largely unable to branch out their appeal without annoying existing consumers.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Impervious
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
Canada4212 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-11-13 00:43:20
November 13 2024 00:42 GMT
#91793
On November 13 2024 09:30 Sadist wrote:
Teslas stock price increasing is bizarre

They have more competition than ever, in fact every day going forward should be tougher for them than the last. More automakers have EVs than ever before.

I have to think Elons behavior is a turn off for some of his target market. I would have thought liberals were the majority of early adopters, i would imagine liberals are getting sick of his courting of MAGA.

It feels like a huge meme stock.



Yea, it seems to be kept at such an inflated value out of pure emotion. I personally don't see how the fundamentals of the company and revenue projections support the price, and I've taken a look because of how well the stock has been doing for my own investment purposes..... Mentally I just can't jump into something that looks so ripe for a crash in value, even if it keeps going up.....
~ \(ˌ)im-ˈpər-vē-əs\ : not capable of being damaged or harmed.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26225 Posts
November 13 2024 00:48 GMT
#91794
On November 13 2024 09:34 Impervious wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 13 2024 06:41 WombaT wrote:
On November 13 2024 05:58 Impervious wrote:
On November 13 2024 03:20 WombaT wrote:
The one that blows my mind is Gaza. It’s a single issue, and you’ve got two realistic candidates. You care enough about the issue to vote for Trump, but not enough to check his positions and history?

Genuinely infuriating. I know people very much dislike GH’s position on this, but it’s not coming from a place of ‘I didn’t bother checking a candidate’s position on a topic I purport to be my electoral motivator’

Other more nebulous, or complicated stuff I’ve a bit more understanding. The more complicated, or ‘vibes’ it goes, the more and more policy and analysis you have to read to get some kinda real grasp on it. The average person isn’t going to do a deep dive comparison on Trump and Biden’s economic policies, the estimated impact of said policies versus worldwide economic shocks and America’s performance relative to roughly equivalent nations, or its own realistic projections. Even if someone would be willing to try, they’re highly likely to not have the understanding to actually do it. I know I wouldn’t

So you need good intermediary messaging. Otherwise ‘Hey I remember things were a bit better under Trump’ is gonna punch pretty hard.

I think there’s a bit of misunderstanding/misuse of ‘anti-establishment’. For me it crops up a lot, in actual usage it seems basically solely targeted towards the core, influential grandees of political parties, and especially the Democratic Party. Perhaps some cultural institutions like big, historic media outlets.

It doesn’t seem to stretch beyond that for many, or invoking it as a driving value doesn’t make much sense.

You can also look at this going back even further. Most people were generally better off under Obama compared to Trump. Then most people were generally better off under Bush compared to Obama. Then most people were generally better under Clinton compared to Bush. Etc. It goes all the way back to the 70's. Social mobility and the ability to achieve the American Dream, which was achievable by the previous generations, has declined pretty steadily since then. While a lot of things have improved, especially technologically since then, the average person has to work more and harder to achieve the same level of relative wealth, even though the average person right now is something like 4x as productive in each hour of work as they were in the 70's. Meanwhile the USA has had unprecedented growth in total wealth in that same period of time.

Logically, we have over 50 years of data showing that trickle down economics, which was one of the biggest changes from that time that can be attributed to this decline, isn't really helping the majority of people. Neither party seems to be competent enough to do anything about this, so I fully expect that in 4 years, the majority of people are going to look back and think that we were better under Biden compared to this 2nd Trump presidency. But the stock market is likely going to be at record highs yet again.....

These observations exist in a relatively rare space, where they’re actually inarguable, to me. If someone wishes to claim the contrary they either haven’t looked at what I’ve looked at, or they have and can’t read the numbers.

Maybe there’s one very specific niche somewhere, but in terms of direction of overall travel I’ve never seen data to the contrary. And I’ve looked at quite a lot.

From my time in retail, chatting to one of the oldies, guy bought a house with his pregnant wife on a single retail worker income back in the day. And then supported his growing family as the single wage moving forwards. Northern Ireland has lower house prices, even factoring for relatively lower wages than many areas of the UK, and many areas of the Republic of Ireland. Even with that, what he did is just outright not possible here unless you life like a monk. In those other areas, living like a monk isn’t sufficient, it’s just outright impossible.

My partner’s sister is a doctor down in Dublin, 3 years in to graduating and working. Still house sharing with some college buddies because they can’t afford to rent solo, much less actually buy.

My parents had free university, I do not. To take another example

As an aside, I'm Canadian, however, our economy is so tightly tied to the US economy that we have very similar trends overall.

I agree that these observations are inarguable. There's so much data to back it up..... There are definitely some legitimate counter-points I've seen, but the overwhelming amount of data out there supports the conclusion that things have been getting steadily worse for the median person for the last 50 years. This goes all the way to now an increase in infant mortality rates and lower life expectancy.

Regarding how much things have changed, I can give you an example from my side of the pond too. The general financial advice that my parents grew up with and shared with me when I was younger was to spend ~25% of your after-tax income on your house, whether that is in rent or ideally a mortgage. This also included repairs, utilities, etc. Spend ~25% on your car(s). This included the payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, etc. Spend ~25% on food, hobbies, vacations, etc as essential and discretionary spending. Finally, put the remaining ~25% into paying off outstanding debts, and if you're out of debt put it towards savings and investments to fund your retirement.

That was considered good advice at the time. Good luck doing that nowadays.

My parents accomplished this, or at least did early on, and by their late 20's had purchased their first home (a small townhome), which they upgraded a few years later using built up equity (a small 3 bedroom duplex) and upgraded again a few years later using more built up equity to buy a pretty nice house with 6 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2 kitchens, a big garage and a couple of acres of decent property (it did need some repairs admittedly, and we definitely put in some sweat equity for it). My mother was a stay at home mom for most of my childhood and my siblings childhoods. My parents were even able to put money into education for me and my siblings. My father did this without a degree, and my mother has a college degree (think more like community college or technical college, as Canada has two different types of post-secondary education in a college system and a university system) that she basically didn't use for more than a couple of years before I was born, and then again about 20 years later. Neither were particularly well educated. Things kinda went sideways because cancer is a bitch, but it's absolutely incredible and infuriating to see how different things are compared to a generation ago, and yet when you look at the economic data available from ~25 years ago and compare it with ~50 years ago, it's about as drastic of a difference between those times too. The struggles we have right now are just a continuation of ~50 years of things getting worse.....

Similar to your partner's sister, we've got struggles affording a place here too. My girlfriend and I have been looking into finally buying a house ourselves, we're in our late 30's, we're both finally doing well financially, and yet we already resigned ourselves to moving out of the city I've been in for the last 16 years and she grew up in because we simply can't afford it now..... Everything either doesn't meet our requirements for even a basic starter home (we both work from home so we basically just need some office space in addition to our bedroom, I want a 2nd bathroom so that if I need to do any renos we still have one that can be functional, and I want a garage or space to add a garage as I used to work on cars and still have the tools for it, so while it would be expensive I could use it to save a bunch of money in the long run), or if it does meet our requirements, it would stretch our budget and leave us house-poor in the process.

As much as I'd love another housing price crash from a selfish/personal perspective, it would absolutely screw both my mother and my girlfriend's parents, as they are both partially relying on equity to fund their retirements, so a crash would likely screw us in a different way. And last time there was a crash, it kinda affected the industry I currently work in (aerospace).....

By all reasonable metrics, the USA did extremely well under Biden over the last 4 years relative to other countries. I would have loved to have both the inflation rate and the GDP percentage growth that the US had compared to us here in Canada, for instance..... To me, it's shocking that the messaging was so awful. While the status quo sucks and the dems were pushing policy that was pretty much just the status quo, Trump's policies and the republican policies seem worse..... All I can say is that it looks like this election was more about emotion than anything else. Things suck right now for most people, and the republicans were able to channel the associated anger and fear better.

Well said.

There’s a big evocative different between a hypothetical and a proven historical quality.

If this was always a struggle, if nobody had an easier t time before you, you gotta frame it in hypotheticals. As that’s not the case, well

‘x isn’t possible because we’re never seen it’ is one thing

You can’t really say ‘x isn’t possible’ when even a casual conversation with your parents, or older folks in general completely shows that it was possible, and happened
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States14063 Posts
November 13 2024 01:02 GMT
#91795
I don't see what the big deal with California taking its time counting votes. The results of the election don't materially matter for a couple months still. On a national level, because its a swing state no one gives a shit on just how much the democrats win by.

If you want something scary and know just how disconnected the US stock market is to reality just look up how much of the worlds asset value is now concentrated in the US stock exchange. Its not something that'll help you sleep at night knowing how much of your parents retirement is riding off that ponzi scheme.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Razyda
Profile Joined March 2013
896 Posts
November 13 2024 03:15 GMT
#91796
Ok. I may be off here, and would gladly got Kwark opinion here, but isnt value of things exactly the amount, people are willing to pay for it? Isn't essentially valuation of the shares/BC inherently the same as fiat currency?
RenSC2
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States1076 Posts
November 13 2024 03:56 GMT
#91797
On November 13 2024 12:15 Razyda wrote:
Ok. I may be off here, and would gladly got Kwark opinion here, but isnt value of things exactly the amount, people are willing to pay for it? Isn't essentially valuation of the shares/BC inherently the same as fiat currency?

Kind of. It is true that a stock is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. However, a stock is an actual share in a company. It has a much more tangible value than pure fiat. Companies have tangible assets and as a stock owner, you own a part of those assets. Buy enough shares in a stock and you have a controlling stake in the company. As a stock owner, you have the right to a share of the profits… a dividend. If it’s good enough, you can earn significant money just from owning shares in the stock.

When people say that stocks are overvalued, they’re basically saying that at the market price, you would not own enough tangible assets or make enough money in dividends to justify the cost. The only value is in selling it to a bigger sucker. When you get situations like that, you’re set up for a bubble and the only question is when it will pop. Granted, that bubble could last decades and you’d be a fool not to profit from it.
Playing better than standard requires deviation. This divergence usually results in sub-standard play.
Husyelt
Profile Blog Joined May 2020
United States837 Posts
November 13 2024 04:06 GMT
#91798
Defense secretary nod is a literal fox news host? ... who claims he hasnt washed his hand in 10 years, says women shouldnt be in the military and is an unhinged lunatic. cool thing the GOP will totally not secure enough votes right ??
You're getting cynical and that won't do I'd throw the rose tint back on the exploded view
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10574 Posts
November 13 2024 06:36 GMT
#91799
There was some debate on election night whether the Dem loss should be blamed on them not appealing enough to centrists vs them appealing too much to centrists and not embracing people further left. I think looking at California election results sheds some light on how people are feeling with the direction they are led.

San Francisco’s incumbent mayor lost her election. This is the one that tried to zing a debate opponent by asking them “Can you name 3 drag queens” because apparently not knowing the names of drag queens is disqualifying to be SF Mayor. In neighboring city Oakland recalled its mayor. They also recalled their “criminal justice reform” district attorney. Just like SF recalled its district attorney a couple years earlier. California voters as a whole also passed a referendum to increase the penalties for theft under $950, passing by I think the largest margin in history but I could be wrong on that. It was also opposed by Gavin Newsom.

These areas don’t have some large contingent of MAGA republicans flipping these elections. This was moderate Dems vs woke/progressive Dems and the progressives got stomped. This was a clear rejection of wokeism. Dems chose to die on the hill of unfavorable policies that don’t work but they will pretend it works because they are good people. Most Americans don’t want open borders, they don’t want biological men to dominate in women’s sports, they don’t want books featuring blowjobs in school libraries, they don’t thinking looting and destroying property is a legitimate form of protest, they don’t want covid lockdowns, especially for children trying to return to school, they don’t want zero restrictions on abortion. Even black people want equal or [i]more[i] police presence in their neighborhoods, they don’t want to defund the police. Even Latinos rejected the term Latinx that woke people decided was better to avoid gendered language. Trump gained black and Latino voters from the last election and it’s not because they are all racists.

Harris tried to pivot in the 11th hour and claim herself to be the moderate but she refused to reject all the woke/progressive policies that she was running from. That’s why all her interview answers were word salad non answers that just pivoted to trashing Trump. Too little too late.
JimmyJRaynor
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada17176 Posts
Last Edited: 2024-11-13 07:19:34
November 13 2024 07:03 GMT
#91800
On November 13 2024 09:34 Impervious wrote:
By all reasonable metrics, the USA did extremely well under Biden over the last 4 years relative to other countries. I would have loved to have both the inflation rate and the GDP percentage growth that the US had compared to us here in Canada, for instance..... To me, it's shocking that the messaging was so awful. While the status quo sucks and the dems were pushing policy that was pretty much just the status quo, Trump's policies and the republican policies seem worse..... All I can say is that it looks like this election was more about emotion than anything else. Things suck right now for most people, and the republicans were able to channel the associated anger and fear better.

I think the USA substantially outperformed Canada because Biden's team was average and Trudeau's team is really dumb. The mainstream media is so biased in favour of Justin Trudeau it is comical.

One big sign of economic affluence is participation in hockey. Hockey is an extremely expensive sport. The USA now has more kids enrolled in hockey than Canada for the first time ever. The USA is now the #1 hockey power on earth ... As I predicted several years ago.

Canada peaked as a country under Chretien. I'd say the USA peaked as a country under either Reagan or Clinton. Both countries are in decline, however, Canada is going down a lot faster.
On November 13 2024 09:34 Impervious wrote:
Similar to your partner's sister, we've got struggles affording a place here too. My girlfriend and I have been looking into finally buying a house ourselves, we're in our late 30's, we're both finally doing well financially,

I'm 37 and I started working at least part of the time in the USA from the time i was 19. Canada no longer offers economic opportunities on par with the USA. Once Ontario decided to "save the world" by going green in 2007... that was the beginning of the end. I bought my first house when I was 24. May God Bless America.

I live a 40 minute drive from St. Catherines, Ontario in upstate New York. The difference in hydro prices between St. Catherines, Canada and Niagara NY is staggering. No wonder there is zero manufacturing going on in Ontario.

Nuclear power is far too expensive and far too dangerous. When we have another 3-mile-island, and we will, Ontario is super fucked. The environmental crazies won't want Ontario using Nuclear or Coal. What will Ontario do for power when they have to abandon Nuclear?

Its great that Trump was elected because he is not going to try to save the universe with crazy green energy policies that Justin Trudeau adopted. Ontario ending coal burning provides a great example for Americans about what not to do.
Ray Kassar To David Crane : "you're no more important to Atari than the factory workers assembling the cartridges"
Prev 1 4588 4589 4590 4591 4592 5408 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
09:00
WardiTV Mondays #67
CranKy Ducklings183
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 114
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 2976
Horang2 2078
Jaedong 697
Larva 578
actioN 389
BeSt 350
Hyuk 335
Leta 213
Rush 208
Killer 179
[ Show more ]
Hyun 138
Light 113
Pusan 102
ggaemo 99
Mong 69
ZerO 68
Aegong 63
Sharp 60
Nal_rA 27
soO 23
Bale 17
JulyZerg 16
yabsab 16
Dota 2
XaKoH 754
NeuroSwarm95
League of Legends
JimRising 544
C9.Mang0518
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss978
zeus457
Super Smash Bros
Westballz35
Other Games
summit1g9645
singsing1564
olofmeister967
crisheroes205
Pyrionflax197
BRAT_OK 57
MindelVK19
ZerO(Twitch)6
B2W.Neo0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick26913
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 6
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
1h 18m
RotterdaM Event
6h 48m
Patches Events
9h 18m
PiGosaur Cup
14h 18m
OSC
1d 1h
SOOP
1d 17h
OSC
2 days
OSC
3 days
SOOP
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
IPSL
6 days
DragOn vs Sziky
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 21
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
Underdog Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.