US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4590
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
Byo
Canada202 Posts
| ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24321 Posts
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote: Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do) The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms. Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition. Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal. I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values. The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation. Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person. | ||
Simberto
Germany11400 Posts
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote: I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do) The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms. Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition. Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal. I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values. The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation. Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person. A related example to this is bitcoin. While not a stock, it still works quite similar. With the exception that it is more stupid. Bitcoin doesn't do anything. It doesn't produce anything, and it doesn't serve any purpose. It is literally people wasting hardware and energy on completely useless calculations. It is completely based on Greater Fool ideas. And yet you can make a lot of money with it. Because, as it turns out, there are quite a lot of pretty Great Fools out there. A market like the stock market or crypto stuff doesn't actually necessarily value stuff based on any real fundamental information about the thing being valued. It values stuff based on an estimate on how other people will value the same thing later. Tesla is valued highly not because of anything that Tesla does, but because it has a weird hype, and even if that hype is stupid, so are a lot of people. Thus, even non-stupid people invest in it, because they expect stupid people to invest in it, too. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24321 Posts
On November 13 2024 05:58 Impervious wrote: You can also look at this going back even further. Most people were generally better off under Obama compared to Trump. Then most people were generally better off under Bush compared to Obama. Then most people were generally better under Clinton compared to Bush. Etc. It goes all the way back to the 70's. Social mobility and the ability to achieve the American Dream, which was achievable by the previous generations, has declined pretty steadily since then. While a lot of things have improved, especially technologically since then, the average person has to work more and harder to achieve the same level of relative wealth, even though the average person right now is something like 4x as productive in each hour of work as they were in the 70's. Meanwhile the USA has had unprecedented growth in total wealth in that same period of time. Logically, we have over 50 years of data showing that trickle down economics, which was one of the biggest changes from that time that can be attributed to this decline, isn't really helping the majority of people. Neither party seems to be competent enough to do anything about this, so I fully expect that in 4 years, the majority of people are going to look back and think that we were better under Biden compared to this 2nd Trump presidency. But the stock market is likely going to be at record highs yet again..... These observations exist in a relatively rare space, where they’re actually inarguable, to me. If someone wishes to claim the contrary they either haven’t looked at what I’ve looked at, or they have and can’t read the numbers. Maybe there’s one very specific niche somewhere, but in terms of direction of overall travel I’ve never seen data to the contrary. And I’ve looked at quite a lot. From my time in retail, chatting to one of the oldies, guy bought a house with his pregnant wife on a single retail worker income back in the day. And then supported his growing family as the single wage moving forwards. Northern Ireland has lower house prices, even factoring for relatively lower wages than many areas of the UK, and many areas of the Republic of Ireland. Even with that, what he did is just outright not possible here unless you life like a monk. In those other areas, living like a monk isn’t sufficient, it’s just outright impossible. My partner’s sister is a doctor down in Dublin, 3 years in to graduating and working. Still house sharing with some college buddies because they can’t afford to rent solo, much less actually buy. My parents had free university, I do not. To take another example | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24321 Posts
On November 13 2024 06:40 Simberto wrote: A related example to this is bitcoin. While not a stock, it still works quite similar. With the exception that it is more stupid. Bitcoin doesn't do anything. It doesn't produce anything, and it doesn't serve any purpose. It is literally people wasting hardware and energy on completely useless calculations. It is completely based on Greater Fool ideas. And yet you can make a lot of money with it. Because, as it turns out, there are quite a lot of pretty Great Fools out there. A market like the stock market or crypto stuff doesn't actually necessarily value stuff based on any real fundamental information about the thing being valued. It values stuff based on an estimate on how other people will value the same thing later. Tesla is valued highly not because of anything that Tesla does, but because it has a weird hype, and even if that hype is stupid, so are a lot of people. Thus, even non-stupid people invest in it, because they expect stupid people to invest in it, too. I know a fellow, indeed a good friend who basically went completely mental and spent all his savings on BitCoin. He just got lucky on the timing. He did these trades while unwell enough to be forcibly institutionalised for his mental health. We do have some fun joshing about it, from my end any investment in a time of psychosis probably not being all that sensible and you fluked it. He’ll make fun of me for even in psychosis not having any balls The frustrating part to me about crypto is it’s just the new Tulip bubble. The actual interesting applications of the tech are entirely subsumed by the speculative market For example, the fundamental tech does enable something like very small micro transactions with no overhead. So it does theoretically enable content delivery mechanisms that charge minute amounts on like, how much of an article you read, or a video you watch. I thought that was interesting because you could have a content delivery model that isn’t say, per click, and you’d incentivise decent, engaging content. But crypto enthusiasts just abandoned this kind of interesting application to horse trade | ||
KT_Elwood
Germany816 Posts
On November 13 2024 06:06 Byo wrote: Perhaps the stock market is where the trickle down happens, we all are vested in the stock market. Company x pays bonus of 3 billion to me, which I don't need, so I throw it into the stock market, and it trickle downs to others who already have same stocks as me. See the economy is doing great In essence It's the world's biggest pyramid sheme and is long disconnected from the purpose of allowing investors to finance innovative or bold companies. Tesla is supposed to be worth more than the sum of all other car manufacturers. It's not. ELon is loved by boomers who like people hair implants and leather jackets | ||
Elroi
Sweden5588 Posts
On November 13 2024 06:24 WombaT wrote: I remember explaining the mechanics of the 2008 financial crash to someone, partly in explaining technical terms in layman’s terms, partly with analogies (something I never otherwise do) The response I got was effectively that that sounds so stupid that I don’t believe you, these institutions can’t be full of idiots. You must just not understand these mechanisms. Brass tacks, the stock market is also fundamentally flawed, although not worthless either. It’s a speculative beast, sometimes very informed by numbers and data, but crucially also influenced by intuition. Crucially it’s also a value assessment based on prediction and perception. Not reality. In a crude sense if that wasn’t the case and it was an assessment of how a company is actually doing, insider trading wouldn’t be illegal. I don’t have any innate issue with betting and gambling, but that’s effectively what the stock market is. Whereas I think many have the perception that it’s some kind of infallible, neutral arbiter of company or asset values. The stock market wasn’t collectively smart enough to figure out that Theranos not actually having a functioning product maybe was a problem in their evaluation. Or that Tesla was at one valued more as a company than the next 10 automobile manufacturers combined is the insane valuation of a crazy person. Theranos wasn't listed on the stock market, though. The founder was just extremely charismatic and forged her results, which managed to deceive some very rich investors. Besides, Tesla already has a very strong product that sells like water in the desert so that's not really comparable. Is Tesla worth 1 trillion dollars? That, I have no idea about. | ||
Magic Powers
Austria3709 Posts
On November 13 2024 07:27 Elroi wrote: Theranos wasn't listed on the stock market, though. The founder was just extremely charismatic and forged her results, which managed to deceive some very rich investors. Besides, Tesla already has a very strong product that sells like water in the desert so that's not really comparable. Is Tesla worth 1 trillion dollars? That, I have no idea about. Twitter also went private under Elon Musk. Nobody knows its value. Sounds familiar? And yes, I'm aware you were talking about Tesla. I'm just doing my thing defaming Elon Musk. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24321 Posts
On November 13 2024 07:27 Elroi wrote: Theranos wasn't listed on the stock market, though. The founder was just extremely charismatic and forged her results, which managed to deceive some very rich investors. Besides, Tesla already has a very strong product that sells like water in the desert so that's not really comparable. Is Tesla worth 1 trillion dollars? That, I have no idea about. Appreciate the technical correction, although I don’t think it really defangs my wider point | ||
Sadist
United States7205 Posts
They have more competition than ever, in fact every day going forward should be tougher for them than the last. More automakers have EVs than ever before. I have to think Elons behavior is a turn off for some of his target market. I would have thought liberals were the majority of early adopters, i would imagine liberals are getting sick of his courting of MAGA. It feels like a huge meme stock. | ||
Impervious
Canada4198 Posts
On November 13 2024 06:41 WombaT wrote: These observations exist in a relatively rare space, where they’re actually inarguable, to me. If someone wishes to claim the contrary they either haven’t looked at what I’ve looked at, or they have and can’t read the numbers. Maybe there’s one very specific niche somewhere, but in terms of direction of overall travel I’ve never seen data to the contrary. And I’ve looked at quite a lot. From my time in retail, chatting to one of the oldies, guy bought a house with his pregnant wife on a single retail worker income back in the day. And then supported his growing family as the single wage moving forwards. Northern Ireland has lower house prices, even factoring for relatively lower wages than many areas of the UK, and many areas of the Republic of Ireland. Even with that, what he did is just outright not possible here unless you life like a monk. In those other areas, living like a monk isn’t sufficient, it’s just outright impossible. My partner’s sister is a doctor down in Dublin, 3 years in to graduating and working. Still house sharing with some college buddies because they can’t afford to rent solo, much less actually buy. My parents had free university, I do not. To take another example As an aside, I'm Canadian, however, our economy is so tightly tied to the US economy that we have very similar trends overall. I agree that these observations are inarguable. There's so much data to back it up..... There are definitely some legitimate counter-points I've seen, but the overwhelming amount of data out there supports the conclusion that things have been getting steadily worse for the median person for the last 50 years. This goes all the way to now an increase in infant mortality rates and lower life expectancy. Regarding how much things have changed, I can give you an example from my side of the pond too. The general financial advice that my parents grew up with and shared with me when I was younger was to spend ~25% of your after-tax income on your house, whether that is in rent or ideally a mortgage. This also included repairs, utilities, etc. Spend ~25% on your car(s). This included the payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, etc. Spend ~25% on food, hobbies, vacations, etc as essential and discretionary spending. Finally, put the remaining ~25% into paying off outstanding debts, and if you're out of debt put it towards savings and investments to fund your retirement. That was considered good advice at the time. Good luck doing that nowadays. My parents accomplished this, or at least did early on, and by their late 20's had purchased their first home (a small townhome), which they upgraded a few years later using built up equity (a small 3 bedroom duplex) and upgraded again a few years later using more built up equity to buy a pretty nice house with 6 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2 kitchens, a big garage and a couple of acres of decent property (it did need some repairs admittedly, and we definitely put in some sweat equity for it). My mother was a stay at home mom for most of my childhood and my siblings childhoods. My parents were even able to put money into education for me and my siblings. My father did this without a degree, and my mother has a college degree (think more like community college or technical college, as Canada has two different types of post-secondary education in a college system and a university system) that she basically didn't use for more than a couple of years before I was born, and then again about 20 years later. Neither were particularly well educated. Things kinda went sideways because cancer is a bitch, but it's absolutely incredible and infuriating to see how different things are compared to a generation ago, and yet when you look at the economic data available from ~25 years ago and compare it with ~50 years ago, it's about as drastic of a difference between those times too. The struggles we have right now are just a continuation of ~50 years of things getting worse..... Similar to your partner's sister, we've got struggles affording a place here too. My girlfriend and I have been looking into finally buying a house ourselves, we're in our late 30's, we're both finally doing well financially, and yet we already resigned ourselves to moving out of the city I've been in for the last 16 years and she grew up in because we simply can't afford it now..... Everything either doesn't meet our requirements for even a basic starter home (we both work from home so we basically just need some office space in addition to our bedroom, I want a 2nd bathroom so that if I need to do any renos we still have one that can be functional, and I want a garage or space to add a garage as I used to work on cars and still have the tools for it, so while it would be expensive I could use it to save a bunch of money in the long run), or if it does meet our requirements, it would stretch our budget and leave us house-poor in the process. As much as I'd love another housing price crash from a selfish/personal perspective, it would absolutely screw both my mother and my girlfriend's parents, as they are both partially relying on equity to fund their retirements, so a crash would likely screw us in a different way. And last time there was a crash, it kinda affected the industry I currently work in (aerospace)..... By all reasonable metrics, the USA did extremely well under Biden over the last 4 years relative to other countries. I would have loved to have both the inflation rate and the GDP percentage growth that the US had compared to us here in Canada, for instance..... To me, it's shocking that the messaging was so awful. While the status quo sucks and the dems were pushing policy that was pretty much just the status quo, Trump's policies and the republican policies seem worse..... All I can say is that it looks like this election was more about emotion than anything else. Things suck right now for most people, and the republicans were able to channel the associated anger and fear better. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24321 Posts
On November 13 2024 09:30 Sadist wrote: Teslas stock price increasing is bizarre They have more competition than ever, in fact every day going forward should be tougher for them than the last. More automakers have EVs than ever before. I have to think Elons behavior is a turn off for some of his target market. I would have thought liberals were the majority of early adopters, i would imagine liberals are getting sick of his courting of MAGA. It feels like a huge meme stock. It’s a nonsense validation given Tesla don’t have too many exclusive patents that prevent someone else just copying them They’ve also been largely unable to branch out their appeal without annoying existing consumers. | ||
Impervious
Canada4198 Posts
On November 13 2024 09:30 Sadist wrote: Teslas stock price increasing is bizarre They have more competition than ever, in fact every day going forward should be tougher for them than the last. More automakers have EVs than ever before. I have to think Elons behavior is a turn off for some of his target market. I would have thought liberals were the majority of early adopters, i would imagine liberals are getting sick of his courting of MAGA. It feels like a huge meme stock. Yea, it seems to be kept at such an inflated value out of pure emotion. I personally don't see how the fundamentals of the company and revenue projections support the price, and I've taken a look because of how well the stock has been doing for my own investment purposes..... Mentally I just can't jump into something that looks so ripe for a crash in value, even if it keeps going up..... | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland24321 Posts
On November 13 2024 09:34 Impervious wrote: As an aside, I'm Canadian, however, our economy is so tightly tied to the US economy that we have very similar trends overall. I agree that these observations are inarguable. There's so much data to back it up..... There are definitely some legitimate counter-points I've seen, but the overwhelming amount of data out there supports the conclusion that things have been getting steadily worse for the median person for the last 50 years. This goes all the way to now an increase in infant mortality rates and lower life expectancy. Regarding how much things have changed, I can give you an example from my side of the pond too. The general financial advice that my parents grew up with and shared with me when I was younger was to spend ~25% of your after-tax income on your house, whether that is in rent or ideally a mortgage. This also included repairs, utilities, etc. Spend ~25% on your car(s). This included the payment, gas, insurance, maintenance, etc. Spend ~25% on food, hobbies, vacations, etc as essential and discretionary spending. Finally, put the remaining ~25% into paying off outstanding debts, and if you're out of debt put it towards savings and investments to fund your retirement. That was considered good advice at the time. Good luck doing that nowadays. My parents accomplished this, or at least did early on, and by their late 20's had purchased their first home (a small townhome), which they upgraded a few years later using built up equity (a small 3 bedroom duplex) and upgraded again a few years later using more built up equity to buy a pretty nice house with 6 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, 2 kitchens, a big garage and a couple of acres of decent property (it did need some repairs admittedly, and we definitely put in some sweat equity for it). My mother was a stay at home mom for most of my childhood and my siblings childhoods. My parents were even able to put money into education for me and my siblings. My father did this without a degree, and my mother has a college degree (think more like community college or technical college, as Canada has two different types of post-secondary education in a college system and a university system) that she basically didn't use for more than a couple of years before I was born, and then again about 20 years later. Neither were particularly well educated. Things kinda went sideways because cancer is a bitch, but it's absolutely incredible and infuriating to see how different things are compared to a generation ago, and yet when you look at the economic data available from ~25 years ago and compare it with ~50 years ago, it's about as drastic of a difference between those times too. The struggles we have right now are just a continuation of ~50 years of things getting worse..... Similar to your partner's sister, we've got struggles affording a place here too. My girlfriend and I have been looking into finally buying a house ourselves, we're in our late 30's, we're both finally doing well financially, and yet we already resigned ourselves to moving out of the city I've been in for the last 16 years and she grew up in because we simply can't afford it now..... Everything either doesn't meet our requirements for even a basic starter home (we both work from home so we basically just need some office space in addition to our bedroom, I want a 2nd bathroom so that if I need to do any renos we still have one that can be functional, and I want a garage or space to add a garage as I used to work on cars and still have the tools for it, so while it would be expensive I could use it to save a bunch of money in the long run), or if it does meet our requirements, it would stretch our budget and leave us house-poor in the process. As much as I'd love another housing price crash from a selfish/personal perspective, it would absolutely screw both my mother and my girlfriend's parents, as they are both partially relying on equity to fund their retirements, so a crash would likely screw us in a different way. And last time there was a crash, it kinda affected the industry I currently work in (aerospace)..... By all reasonable metrics, the USA did extremely well under Biden over the last 4 years relative to other countries. I would have loved to have both the inflation rate and the GDP percentage growth that the US had compared to us here in Canada, for instance..... To me, it's shocking that the messaging was so awful. While the status quo sucks and the dems were pushing policy that was pretty much just the status quo, Trump's policies and the republican policies seem worse..... All I can say is that it looks like this election was more about emotion than anything else. Things suck right now for most people, and the republicans were able to channel the associated anger and fear better. Well said. There’s a big evocative different between a hypothetical and a proven historical quality. If this was always a struggle, if nobody had an easier t time before you, you gotta frame it in hypotheticals. As that’s not the case, well ‘x isn’t possible because we’re never seen it’ is one thing You can’t really say ‘x isn’t possible’ when even a casual conversation with your parents, or older folks in general completely shows that it was possible, and happened | ||
Sermokala
United States13805 Posts
If you want something scary and know just how disconnected the US stock market is to reality just look up how much of the worlds asset value is now concentrated in the US stock exchange. Its not something that'll help you sleep at night knowing how much of your parents retirement is riding off that ponzi scheme. | ||
Razyda
559 Posts
| ||
RenSC2
United States1047 Posts
On November 13 2024 12:15 Razyda wrote: Ok. I may be off here, and would gladly got Kwark opinion here, but isnt value of things exactly the amount, people are willing to pay for it? Isn't essentially valuation of the shares/BC inherently the same as fiat currency? Kind of. It is true that a stock is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it. However, a stock is an actual share in a company. It has a much more tangible value than pure fiat. Companies have tangible assets and as a stock owner, you own a part of those assets. Buy enough shares in a stock and you have a controlling stake in the company. As a stock owner, you have the right to a share of the profits… a dividend. If it’s good enough, you can earn significant money just from owning shares in the stock. When people say that stocks are overvalued, they’re basically saying that at the market price, you would not own enough tangible assets or make enough money in dividends to justify the cost. The only value is in selling it to a bigger sucker. When you get situations like that, you’re set up for a bubble and the only question is when it will pop. Granted, that bubble could last decades and you’d be a fool not to profit from it. | ||
Husyelt
United States823 Posts
| ||
BlackJack
United States10332 Posts
San Francisco’s incumbent mayor lost her election. This is the one that tried to zing a debate opponent by asking them “Can you name 3 drag queens” because apparently not knowing the names of drag queens is disqualifying to be SF Mayor. In neighboring city Oakland recalled its mayor. They also recalled their “criminal justice reform” district attorney. Just like SF recalled its district attorney a couple years earlier. California voters as a whole also passed a referendum to increase the penalties for theft under $950, passing by I think the largest margin in history but I could be wrong on that. It was also opposed by Gavin Newsom. These areas don’t have some large contingent of MAGA republicans flipping these elections. This was moderate Dems vs woke/progressive Dems and the progressives got stomped. This was a clear rejection of wokeism. Dems chose to die on the hill of unfavorable policies that don’t work but they will pretend it works because they are good people. Most Americans don’t want open borders, they don’t want biological men to dominate in women’s sports, they don’t want books featuring blowjobs in school libraries, they don’t thinking looting and destroying property is a legitimate form of protest, they don’t want covid lockdowns, especially for children trying to return to school, they don’t want zero restrictions on abortion. Even black people want equal or [i]more[i] police presence in their neighborhoods, they don’t want to defund the police. Even Latinos rejected the term Latinx that woke people decided was better to avoid gendered language. Trump gained black and Latino voters from the last election and it’s not because they are all racists. Harris tried to pivot in the 11th hour and claim herself to be the moderate but she refused to reject all the woke/progressive policies that she was running from. That’s why all her interview answers were word salad non answers that just pivoted to trashing Trump. Too little too late. | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16629 Posts
On November 13 2024 09:34 Impervious wrote: By all reasonable metrics, the USA did extremely well under Biden over the last 4 years relative to other countries. I would have loved to have both the inflation rate and the GDP percentage growth that the US had compared to us here in Canada, for instance..... To me, it's shocking that the messaging was so awful. While the status quo sucks and the dems were pushing policy that was pretty much just the status quo, Trump's policies and the republican policies seem worse..... All I can say is that it looks like this election was more about emotion than anything else. Things suck right now for most people, and the republicans were able to channel the associated anger and fear better. I think the USA substantially outperformed Canada because Biden's team was average and Trudeau's team is really dumb. The mainstream media is so biased in favour of Justin Trudeau it is comical. One big sign of economic affluence is participation in hockey. Hockey is an extremely expensive sport. The USA now has more kids enrolled in hockey than Canada for the first time ever. The USA is now the #1 hockey power on earth ... As I predicted several years ago. Canada peaked as a country under Chretien. I'd say the USA peaked as a country under either Reagan or Clinton. Both countries are in decline, however, Canada is going down a lot faster. On November 13 2024 09:34 Impervious wrote: Similar to your partner's sister, we've got struggles affording a place here too. My girlfriend and I have been looking into finally buying a house ourselves, we're in our late 30's, we're both finally doing well financially, I'm 37 and I started working at least part of the time in the USA from the time i was 19. Canada no longer offers economic opportunities on par with the USA. Once Ontario decided to "save the world" by going green in 2007... that was the beginning of the end. I bought my first house when I was 24. May God Bless America. I live a 40 minute drive from St. Catherines, Ontario in upstate New York. The difference in hydro prices between St. Catherines, Canada and Niagara NY is staggering. No wonder there is zero manufacturing going on in Ontario. Nuclear power is far too expensive and far too dangerous. When we have another 3-mile-island, and we will, Ontario is super fucked. The environmental crazies won't want Ontario using Nuclear or Coal. What will Ontario do for power when they have to abandon Nuclear? Its great that Trump was elected because he is not going to try to save the universe with crazy green energy policies that Justin Trudeau adopted. Ontario ending coal burning provides a great example for Americans about what not to do. | ||
| ||