|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
On July 10 2018 11:05 TheLordofAwesome wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2018 08:21 Plansix wrote:On July 10 2018 08:12 TheLordofAwesome wrote:http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/07/trump-putin-russia-collusion.htmlAnyone seen this piece by Jonathan Chait? There's nothing really new in it per se, but Chait does a good job of simply recording a lot of important little details about Trump's history all in the same article. The "conspiratorial pessimistic outlook" presented in the article sums up my view of the whole matter fairly well. Namely, Trump is Russia's man through and through and has been since 1987. This doesn't mean all his actions since 1987 were taken specifically at the behest of the Kremlin, just that ever since 1987 the Kremlin viewed Trump as a useful person of influence in the USA whom they had leverage over. Also, their leverage over him seems to have increased considerably since 1987 due to all the Russian cash financing the Trump Org in the 2000s (see Don Jr's statements in 2008 and Eric's in 2014). If you think I sound insane, I suggest you read the article. I saw that earlier. It is a little conspiratorial, but my view on Trump + Russia has always been that even if 25% of it is true, it’s still terrible. But even if it is as bad as it could be, I don't know how congress sells it to the American people while Fox News exists. Of course it is conspiratorial. The entire hypothesis is that Team Trump and the Russians were involved since 1987 in a clandestine relationship, culminating in a conspiracy in 2016 to sway the election in Trump's favor as much as possible. I don't think the Russians or Trump actually expected to win, though. I think they expected Trump to lose, scream the election was rigged, and start Trump TV in 2017. Trump could then become the apotheosis of Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, and Michael Savage, and be the new kingmaker of the Republican Party. The FBI under Clinton would investigate and discover the Russians' full plot, but Trump would avoid actual prosecution by DOJ for his conspiracy with the Russians because it would be a political death sentence for Clinton to launch an investigation into her just-vanquished Presidential opponent. Then Trump won and tried to end the FBI investigation into his actions in the most ham-handed fashion imaginable. Cue Robert Mueller. John Brennan, James Clapper, and Michael Hayden have all talked about Trump in ways that I never imagined former CIA directors / a former NSA director / a former DNI talking about a US President. I mean, Brennan, who was the head of the CIA for the entire 2016 election cycle right up to Trump's inauguration, says stuff about Trump like: 1. When the full extent of your venality, moral turpitude, and political corruption becomes known, you will take your rightful place as a disgraced demagogue in the dustbin of history. 2. Your fear of exposure is palpable. Your desperation even more so. 3. You are to governance & politics what Bernie Madoff was to the stock market & investment advice. The two of you share a remarkably unethical ability to deceive & manipulate others, building Ponzi schemes to aggrandize yourselves. Truth & justice ultimately caught up with Bernie. 4. Frequently, people who go along a treasonous path do not know they are on a treasonous path until it is too late. If this were any other administration, comments like that from the guy who just stepped down from running the CIA, during a huge active investigation into a conspiracy between Team Trump and the Russian government, would be national news stories in and of themselves. Instead, no one is even seeming to pay attention to this. I have a much simpler explanation. All of those guys are a bunch of political hacks who operated in arguably the most political White House in history that was stacked with people who had few qualms about using its power for political purposes (e.g. Lois Lerner).
|
On July 10 2018 11:30 screamingpalm wrote: Welp… time to see if Susan Collins can show some leadership and form a coalition.
I have bad news for you:
In the end, with all the material out there on Kavanaugh, we will get weeks of this or that in the news cycle and then he will be confirmed relativity easily. Even if the vote is closer, than Gorsuch, it should not be in real danger.
|
But dauntless, everyone in Washington is a political hack to you. And I have no idea what the “most political White House in US history” means. You do know that the only thing they do in Washington is politics, right?
Edit: the dude is getting confirmed. It’s just a question of if Roberts lets the court overturn rulings like Roe, or further gut the civil rights act. And if anyone wanted to limit corporate money in politics, best push for amending the constitution because that is the only way it happens.
|
Thanks I'm now thoroughly depressed lol. Wow she sold out fast!
|
Trump wasn’t going to pick someone who wasn’t a shoe-in this time around. However, I’m looking forward to the left’s gigantic temper when Trump nominates Barrett to replace Ginsburg.
|
Collins is naive enough to believe the court won’t overturn a ruling like Roe.
|
On July 10 2018 11:52 xDaunt wrote: Trump wasn’t going to pick someone who wasn’t a shoe-in this time around. However, I’m looking forward to the left’s gigantic temper when Trump nominates Barrett to replace Ginsburg.
Let's not count chickens. I think she will be the pick, should a Republican have the chance, though.
|
On July 10 2018 11:53 Plansix wrote: Collins is naive enough to believe the court won’t overturn a ruling like Roe.
They won't, at least not in one fell swoop. Too many of the justices are not temperamentally inclined that way, at least to me.
|
On July 10 2018 11:56 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2018 11:53 Plansix wrote: Collins is naive enough to believe the court won’t overturn a ruling like Roe. They won't, at least not in one fall swoop. Too many of the justices are not temperamentally inclined that way, at least to me. I’m not dumb enough to believe that. Given the past behavior of the less conservative court, including citizens united, there isn’t a lot of concern for stability and consistency in rulings.
They overturned a 40 year old ruling without a seconds glance less than a month ago. They gutted the voter’s rights act by overturning the ruling that made it effective. They will overturn it and then act really surprised when a vast number of states effectively outlaw abortion. This has always been about undoing the the rulings of the court from the 1960s and 1970s through the mythical power origionalism.
|
Many of the rulings from the 1960s and 1970s are such activist garbage that they are aberrations in jurisprudence. I’m not sad to see them go — particularly the rulings that dealt with topics that should have been handled legislatively or through the amendment process.
|
Just as long as you folks make the big super villain reveal and finally admit it was never about the origional meaning of the constitution, but imposing your political views through the court, because it is more durable that legislation and there is less opposition.
But you are there and we all know the plan. So congrats and there is no need to hide it any more. The plan is making abortion illegal across America, gutting unions, overturning civil rights legislation.
It is going to be fun to watch the conservative be dumbfounded by the anger and tension from all these wildly unpopular views with will be imposing on Americans.
|
Maybe we will get some new amendments out of this to protect our best rulings.
|
On July 10 2018 11:20 TheLordofAwesome wrote:@a_flayer Show nested quote +And it’s all related to the steeped-in-creepy-history transatlantic relationship between the United States and Europe. And not to mention NATO in modern times. Here’s what I think of NATO in the language of the intelligentsia which might appease your "he's a Russian propagandist!" sensibilities:
SEOUL, South Korea—A top adviser to South Korea’s president says he would eventually like to see the U.S.–South Korea alliance end. In language that sounded almost Trump-like, Chung In Moon, a special adviser to President Moon Jae In for foreign affairs and national security, said in an interview that alliances in general are a “very unnatural state of international relations” and said that, “for me, the best thing is to really get rid of alliance.” There you go. "Alliances in general are a very unnatural state of international relations." Isn't that the fucking truth of it.
--omitted for brevity--
Meanwhile, I saw this excellent coverage on the Poor People's Campaign from RT America, where Americans in America covering American news are apparently quite literally labeled as Russian Foreign Agents:
There's got to be Soviet jokes about this kind of thing. Government law enforcement arresting people for protesting poverty, while government representatives are lying to the media about poverty and at the same time government intelligence agencies even accusing people who report on poverty of being foreign agents?
I’ve also noticed that a lot of the same people who show up on places like Democracy Now and Jimmy Dore (like I linked at the start) are literally the same people that show up as guests on RT America. Basically just socialist anti-empire activists that don't see the light of day on corporate media. Jimmy's been on RT, too. And that lady who was at Occupy. They're all part of the same circle of people fighting to get the socialist anti-empire message out, and now they're probably all tainted with the label "associate of Russian Foreign Agent" in some NSA/FBI database. It’s just a cruel joke.
Honestly, the only thing find wrong with RT America is the fact that apparently no American billionaires will help those American people broadcast their message so that they can be free of "Russian influence". For the pro-socialist anti-war anti-police state activists it's simply “different aims, different means, but common ground in between”. Let me get this straight. You want to dismantle NATO and the US-Korea alliance. You want to close most or all overseas US military bases and have the US retreat back into pre-WWII isolationism. You detest "corporate media" but love RT, which is literal Russian propaganda openly financed by the Kremlin. Every single one of these views are 100% in line with Moscow's beliefs. Yet you complain about people on this forum viewing you as a mouthpiece for Russian propaganda? Either you are the quintessential useful idiot or you are an actual paid troll. PS: What is the "steeped-in-creepy-history transatlantic relationship between the United States and Europe. And not to mention NATO in modern times." Honestly haven't heard this line of attack before. Something about the slave trade of the 1700s and early 1800s I'm guessing? But that doesn't fit into your talk about modern times.... Do enlighten me. Don't be such an FBI agent. Why are you posting this here?
I just want the Roman Transatlantic Empire to dismantle before the Christian slaves African refugees break down the gates of Rome and let the barbarians Islamic terrorists in. Disturbingly enough, I don't even need to replace "Rome" with anything to make this work. You do have use "break down the gates of Rome" as a metaphor for "tear apart the European Union". But no, I don't think Muslims are terrorists. I'm just drawing the parallel between 2000 years ago and today.
I don't want numerous refugee crises related to war, terrorism and climate change cause Italy to leave the European Union because of ever-increasing xenophobia as refugee floods get worse and through that ruin the Transatlantic Empire. I want to ruin the Transatlantic Empire by dealing with the problem at hand and simply -- gradually and safely over, say, two decades -- sever some needless ties between the EU and US (and Asia, but I should stay out of that if I had any decency) so that we can all (including Russia and China) figure out our internal problems on our own.
But a lot of this is also in line with the Russian propaganda, I believe. I've seen at least half of it listed on both NATO websites and the ODNI report. As far as I'm concerned, I'm just embracing reality at this point. Well, sort of, anyway...
I also want a world-wide Socialist Revolution where people can grow their own food in a stable climate where they won't have to rely on aid. We should invest in African sustainable fisheries. I want a fully self-sustainable world for all 10 billion people by 2050 and a fully sustainable world with equal living conditions and similar chances for all 12-15 billion people by 2100. It won't come unless the American media gets behind it, and that won't come until the 'exceptional' neoliberal jingoism stops. And I think the Empire has to end for that to happen.
|
I know this is awkward timing considering my previous post, but I posted the following a few days ago when I saw some social media campaign about "walking away from Democrats cause they're so racist".
On July 06 2018 16:58 a_flayer wrote:On an unrelated note, did anyone catch wind of that "#walkaway" campaign? It seems so horribly manufactured, I can't even begin to describe it. Sounds like the Russians are at it again, just like they must have hacked the Ocasio-Cortez website that one time.
In case it wasn't clear, I was being sarcastic when I blamed it on Russia, but it seems the media has caught on.
They're blaming it on Russia.
Kremlin-affiliated trolls have subversively co-opted #WalkAway as an influence campaign, data appears to show. The hashtag is boosting visibility for a right-wing-hyped non-movement of disenchanted liberals who are supposedly abandoning the Democratic Party in a bid to breed division.
Data available through Hamilton 68, an analysis project focused on monitoring agitprop and backed by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, shows that swarms of Russian troll accounts made #WalkAway one of the highest ranking hashtags on Twitter in the past 48 hours.
One writer for Arc Digital noticed similar trends and came to the same conclusion.
“The primary functional goal of an astroturfed campaign like this one is to manipulate public opinion by gaming online algorithms to amplify certain content and push it onto people’s social media feeds and to the top of search engine results,” wrote behavioral scientist Caroline Orr.
The #WalkAway hashtag itself can be sourced back to a YouTube video posted in May by New York-based hairdresser Brandon Straka. In the video, Straka explains how he had grown disillusioned by liberalism and the Democratic Party which, he argued, merely used people of color and LGBTQ people but did little to advance their agenda. He then calls on others who feel the same to #WalkAway from the Democratic Party—thus launching the campaign.
Little had come of it until last week, when right-wing media outlets and leading conservatives discovered the video and began circulating it online. Coverage by websites like the Gateway Pundit and Breitbart hailed the news as a watershed moment, claiming that liberals were abandoning their party “in droves.”
The Daily Dot reported on how, even at that early stage and among the dozens of real ex-Democrats telling their stories, bot Twitter accounts were already beginning to exploit the rising conversation. One collected 16,000 retweets before being banned. Source
The account that they use as an example is currently suspended but still visible here in the Web Archive. I'm sure there's bots from Russian IP addresses retweeting this, and this may be one, but it does not look like a Russian government bot to me at all. It's a bot alright, but I do not believe this to be part of a Russian government plot.
Whether it's the racist evil genius computer scientist Robert Mercer and his buddy Steve Bannon or some other racist American billionaires and their henchmen, or perhaps a country like Israel (maybe both), I can't tell you. But Russia is just not on my radar for this one.
|
On July 10 2018 14:18 a_flayer wrote:I know this is awkward timing considering my previous post, but I posted the following a few days ago when I saw some social media campaign about "walking away from Democrats cause they're so racist". Show nested quote +On July 06 2018 16:58 a_flayer wrote:On an unrelated note, did anyone catch wind of that "#walkaway" campaign? It seems so horribly manufactured, I can't even begin to describe it. Sounds like the Russians are at it again, just like they must have hacked the Ocasio-Cortez website that one time. In case it wasn't clear, I was being sarcastic when I blamed it on Russia, but it seems the media has caught on. They're blaming it on Russia. Show nested quote +Kremlin-affiliated trolls have subversively co-opted #WalkAway as an influence campaign, data appears to show. The hashtag is boosting visibility for a right-wing-hyped non-movement of disenchanted liberals who are supposedly abandoning the Democratic Party in a bid to breed division.
Data available through Hamilton 68, an analysis project focused on monitoring agitprop and backed by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, shows that swarms of Russian troll accounts made #WalkAway one of the highest ranking hashtags on Twitter in the past 48 hours.
One writer for Arc Digital noticed similar trends and came to the same conclusion.
“The primary functional goal of an astroturfed campaign like this one is to manipulate public opinion by gaming online algorithms to amplify certain content and push it onto people’s social media feeds and to the top of search engine results,” wrote behavioral scientist Caroline Orr.
The #WalkAway hashtag itself can be sourced back to a YouTube video posted in May by New York-based hairdresser Brandon Straka. In the video, Straka explains how he had grown disillusioned by liberalism and the Democratic Party which, he argued, merely used people of color and LGBTQ people but did little to advance their agenda. He then calls on others who feel the same to #WalkAway from the Democratic Party—thus launching the campaign.
Little had come of it until last week, when right-wing media outlets and leading conservatives discovered the video and began circulating it online. Coverage by websites like the Gateway Pundit and Breitbart hailed the news as a watershed moment, claiming that liberals were abandoning their party “in droves.”
The Daily Dot reported on how, even at that early stage and among the dozens of real ex-Democrats telling their stories, bot Twitter accounts were already beginning to exploit the rising conversation. One collected 16,000 retweets before being banned. SourceThe account that they use as an example is currently suspended but still visible here in the Web Archive. I'm sure there's bots from Russian IP addresses retweeting this, and this may be one, but it does not look like a Russian government bot to me at all. It's a bot alright, but I do not believe this to be part of a Russian government plot. Whether it's the racist evil genius computer scientist Robert Mercer and his buddy Steve Bannon or some other racist American billionaires and their henchmen, or perhaps a country like Israel (maybe both), I can't tell you. But Russia is just not on my radar for this one.
So it's a bot from Russia, but not a government one? What makes you say that, the lack of hammers and sickles in the profile?
|
So, if we cannot depend on Susan Collins to keep her word, and before we blame Russia for this too, can Democrats please stop trying to appeal to moderate Republicans as a strategy? Cheers! 
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On July 10 2018 15:18 screamingpalm wrote:So, if we cannot depend on Susan Collins to keep her word, and before we blame Russia for this too, can Democrats please stop trying to appeal to moderate Republicans as a strategy? Cheers! + Show Spoiler +
Sooner or later I'm hoping people realize that the Democrats are the moderate Republicans
Democrats have been quoting Reagan more than Republicans have lately.
|
Uhm... I get the outrage about the last supreme court pick that clearly should have been Obamas. But for this one?
You voted for a republican President, House/Senate are Republican, a judge retired during this term... So you will get a republican/conservative Judge. Where exactly is the point of attack here?
|
Did we vote for a Republican, or against Hillary? Citation needed here.
|
On July 10 2018 15:12 Longshank wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2018 14:18 a_flayer wrote:I know this is awkward timing considering my previous post, but I posted the following a few days ago when I saw some social media campaign about "walking away from Democrats cause they're so racist". On July 06 2018 16:58 a_flayer wrote:On an unrelated note, did anyone catch wind of that "#walkaway" campaign? It seems so horribly manufactured, I can't even begin to describe it. Sounds like the Russians are at it again, just like they must have hacked the Ocasio-Cortez website that one time. In case it wasn't clear, I was being sarcastic when I blamed it on Russia, but it seems the media has caught on. They're blaming it on Russia. Kremlin-affiliated trolls have subversively co-opted #WalkAway as an influence campaign, data appears to show. The hashtag is boosting visibility for a right-wing-hyped non-movement of disenchanted liberals who are supposedly abandoning the Democratic Party in a bid to breed division.
Data available through Hamilton 68, an analysis project focused on monitoring agitprop and backed by the Alliance for Securing Democracy, shows that swarms of Russian troll accounts made #WalkAway one of the highest ranking hashtags on Twitter in the past 48 hours.
One writer for Arc Digital noticed similar trends and came to the same conclusion.
“The primary functional goal of an astroturfed campaign like this one is to manipulate public opinion by gaming online algorithms to amplify certain content and push it onto people’s social media feeds and to the top of search engine results,” wrote behavioral scientist Caroline Orr.
The #WalkAway hashtag itself can be sourced back to a YouTube video posted in May by New York-based hairdresser Brandon Straka. In the video, Straka explains how he had grown disillusioned by liberalism and the Democratic Party which, he argued, merely used people of color and LGBTQ people but did little to advance their agenda. He then calls on others who feel the same to #WalkAway from the Democratic Party—thus launching the campaign.
Little had come of it until last week, when right-wing media outlets and leading conservatives discovered the video and began circulating it online. Coverage by websites like the Gateway Pundit and Breitbart hailed the news as a watershed moment, claiming that liberals were abandoning their party “in droves.”
The Daily Dot reported on how, even at that early stage and among the dozens of real ex-Democrats telling their stories, bot Twitter accounts were already beginning to exploit the rising conversation. One collected 16,000 retweets before being banned. SourceThe account that they use as an example is currently suspended but still visible here in the Web Archive. I'm sure there's bots from Russian IP addresses retweeting this, and this may be one, but it does not look like a Russian government bot to me at all. It's a bot alright, but I do not believe this to be part of a Russian government plot. Whether it's the racist evil genius computer scientist Robert Mercer and his buddy Steve Bannon or some other racist American billionaires and their henchmen, or perhaps a country like Israel (maybe both), I can't tell you. But Russia is just not on my radar for this one. So it's a bot from Russia, but not a government one? What makes you say that, the lack of hammers and sickles in the profile? Just the way it is aligned behind very specific talking points. It's just my own conclusion. It doesn't have to be from Russia, I don't have access to technical information and neither do the "journalists" reporting on it. But even if it has a Russian IP, it could just be ran from a Russian datacenter hired by some American. I just can't see a "Russian bot" there, but only a "White House"-aligned bot. I doubt its controlled by someone inside the WH, but its controlled by someone who supports it. And I have no reason to suspect Russia in this particular event.
|
|
|
|