|
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread |
I really don't get the Elon Musk hate. I can't find anyone else currently alive that has made as much of a contribution to future technology, whether it is making electric cars mainstream, or reusable space travel. To describe him as a conman, when his achievements are open for all to see, is inane.
|
|
On April 26 2022 09:47 gobbledydook wrote: I really don't get the Elon Musk hate. I can't find anyone else currently alive that has made as much of a contribution to future technology, whether it is making electric cars mainstream, or reusable space travel. To describe him as a conman, when his achievements are open for all to see, is inane. Musk is hard to categorize. He runs important businesses, but also ridiculous scams. He's a visionary, but he's so petty he sicced a PI on a rescue diver for talking back. You can't trust anything he says, but sometimes he'll actually do the dope shit he says he'll do. And, of course, he's insanely rich, so his class interests do not align with ours.
|
He became insanely rich because he built important companies that provide immense value to society. He didn't earn this money trading in a hedge fund, or from his dad, or digging for oil. As far as billionaires go, I think he's earned it more than most others.
|
On April 26 2022 09:47 gobbledydook wrote: I really don't get the Elon Musk hate. I can't find anyone else currently alive that has made as much of a contribution to future technology, whether it is making electric cars mainstream, or reusable space travel. To describe him as a conman, when his achievements are open for all to see, is inane.
It is really bizarre. His companies have built rockets that land vertically and electric cars that go 0-60 in 2 seconds but there is a contingent of people that want to paint him as a con man a la Elizabeth Holmes.
|
On April 26 2022 11:21 gobbledydook wrote: He became insanely rich because he built important companies that provide immense value to society. He didn't earn this money trading in a hedge fund, or from his dad, or digging for oil. As far as billionaires go, I think he's earned it more than most others.
He definitely earned money on his own ventures. But make no mistake, he comes from wealthy family and has had more money then most of us his entire existence. The numbers are just unfathomably larger now.
|
Also, not sure how much credit he deserves for buying something and slapping his cult of personality on it.
|
I don't think he deserves any credit for buying Twitter. That's his own money and he is doing what he pleases with it. He deserves credit for Tesla and SpaceX, which so many are reluctant to admit. That he is an asshole is beside the point.
|
United States42513 Posts
On April 26 2022 12:50 gobbledydook wrote: I don't think he deserves any credit for buying Twitter. That's his own money and he is doing what he pleases with it. He deserves credit for Tesla and SpaceX, which so many are reluctant to admit. That he is an asshole is beside the point. He bought Tesla.
|
On April 26 2022 12:51 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2022 12:50 gobbledydook wrote: I don't think he deserves any credit for buying Twitter. That's his own money and he is doing what he pleases with it. He deserves credit for Tesla and SpaceX, which so many are reluctant to admit. That he is an asshole is beside the point. He bought Tesla. 1) Tesla didn't actually have a product when he bought it. Every one of Tesla's cars was created after Elon took over. 2) Elon founded SpaceX.
|
Tesla isn't worth more than all other car companies in the world. Spacex was started with and is sustained by massive public support. Tesla was also only able to survive because of massive government funding. Everything he has was build on either public investment or apartheid wealth. He deserves little to no credit for what his companies have achieved.
And yet he acts reprehensible all the time retailaiting against anyone who talks back to him or raises any type of attempt to tax him fairly. Let's not even start to look at how he treats his family. And now this guy is going to be in control of the largest social media marketplace today?
|
I don’t care about Musk; he is just a megalomaniac tech billionaire that does and say good stuff sometimes and super dumb stuff most others.
The fact that a self proclaimed free speech absolutist now owns twitter though means it will be even more of a springboard for hate speech, extremism, abuse and disinformation than it already is. And that’s bad news for everyone. Twitter needs to be vastly more regulated, not the opposite.
|
On April 26 2022 16:08 Biff The Understudy wrote: I don’t care about Musk; he is just a megalomaniac tech billionaire that does and say good stuff sometimes and super dumb stuff most others.
The fact that a self proclaimed free speech absolutist now owns twitter though means it will be even more of a springboard for hate speech, extremism, abuse and disinformation than it already is. And that’s bad news for everyone. Twitter needs to be vastly more regulated, not the opposite.
Maybe this will lead to governments actually getting off their arse and regulating them? Because Twitter self-regulating is bad, no matter who is in charge.
|
On April 26 2022 14:43 Sermokala wrote: Tesla isn't worth more than all other car companies in the world. Spacex was started with and is sustained by massive public support. Tesla was also only able to survive because of massive government funding. Everything he has was build on either public investment or apartheid wealth. He deserves little to no credit for what his companies have achieved.
And yet he acts reprehensible all the time retailaiting against anyone who talks back to him or raises any type of attempt to tax him fairly. Let's not even start to look at how he treats his family. And now this guy is going to be in control of the largest social media marketplace today?
If it was so easy, why has no one else been able to do it? Why is it that no other space company has been able to do what SpaceX has done? Why is it that when we talk about electic cars, Tesla is the first brand we think of? Just because he got help along the way does not in any way diminish his achievements - no one gets to where they are without help from someone.
|
Because Tesla is just the new apple and people love the hype. Building super fast electric cars is also plenty of things, but not "green" or whatever you would like to call it. It being the most valuable car company in the world is ultimate proof that the stock market has lost its connection to reality.
Reusable/Landing Rockets is cool but afaik thats as far as it goes when it comes to their "impact" atm?
Musk/Tesla is basically a giant marketing ploy... But people like their celebrities so they eat it up.
I have no issues with any of the products, atleast not more than with plenty of other stuff, but the hype around the products and the persona makes me wanna womit.
|
Tesla is the worst thing when it comes to electrical cars. We do not need Tesla, we need 800kg cars that are able to drive 110 km/h max for 600 km. Tesla might have contributed to other companies shifting faster, by how much i don't know. SpaceX is cool, but 100% not necessary. Space exploration has had a positive impact on societey for the technology it created and so on, but then this guy wants to shoot rockets from New York to Tokyo, so that ultrarich can travel faster. And all he might have done unintentionally to protect the environment with Tesla is out of the window. He also wants to sell flamethrowers and monorail. And he made all his money by the big soeciety changing for the better paypal, so much contribution, wow. Basically, the man shows on a daily basis, that whatever he does is driven by making money and increasing his ego and that all positive outcomes for society are random byproducts of a brain that wants cool stuff.
|
Northern Ireland24978 Posts
On April 26 2022 12:42 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On April 26 2022 09:47 gobbledydook wrote: I really don't get the Elon Musk hate. I can't find anyone else currently alive that has made as much of a contribution to future technology, whether it is making electric cars mainstream, or reusable space travel. To describe him as a conman, when his achievements are open for all to see, is inane. It is really bizarre. His companies have built rockets that land vertically and electric cars that go 0-60 in 2 seconds but there is a contingent of people that want to paint him as a con man a la Elizabeth Holmes. It’s the status he’s given and his happiness to accept said status that is con man-esque, it’s not all smoke and mirrors no.
People act like he’s done all this single-handedly and he doesn’t do a huge amount to disavow them of this notion that he’s a visionary trans-planetary genius. Depends on one’s level of exposure but the Church of Musk prosthelytising can be a ‘tad’ obnoxious.
He’s a savvy businessman who’s overseen some good tech development, some with government funding. If he behaved accordingly rather than well, how he behaves a lot of people would have considerably less of a problem with.
He wants to have his cake and eat it, be the saviour of humanity but entirely on his terms, while not getting criticised for it. Very, very spiky when it comes to criticism that one.
How long has this ridiculous hyperloop idea been pushed when he could just Google what a train is? To take one example. Or pushing his green credentials while evangelising about crypto. But you do have cool, useful stuff like what you mentioned, or Starlink
He’s a flawed bloke like all of us, with a truly ungodly amount of money and power. Nothing really to be done than wait and see what he wants to do with it.
|
On April 26 2022 18:35 Broetchenholer wrote: Tesla is the worst thing when it comes to electrical cars. We do not need Tesla, we need 800kg cars that are able to drive 110 km/h max for 600 km. Tesla might have contributed to other companies shifting faster, by how much i don't know. SpaceX is cool, but 100% not necessary. Space exploration has had a positive impact on societey for the technology it created and so on, but then this guy wants to shoot rockets from New York to Tokyo, so that ultrarich can travel faster. And all he might have done unintentionally to protect the environment with Tesla is out of the window. He also wants to sell flamethrowers and monorail. And he made all his money by the big soeciety changing for the better paypal, so much contribution, wow. Basically, the man shows on a daily basis, that whatever he does is driven by making money and increasing his ego and that all positive outcomes for society are random byproducts of a brain that wants cool stuff. By all accounts Thomas Edison was an asshole and driven by making money. Do we then say that him inventing the electric light should therefore be dismissed because he did it to make money?
History will remember Elon Musk as a great man. His name will be taught in history books a hundred years in the future. Of that I am certain.
|
I think we should remember Thomas Edison as kind of a dick for fucking over Tesla over alternating vs. direct current, tbh.
Edison was a huge asshole.
|
Edison is a good figure to compare Musk with. Both can be lionized on a superficial basis that fails to account for the underhanded things they did in pursuit of their own power and influence, and both can be more properly understood as highly influential, ruthless business people that rose to the occasion of capitalizing on new market space created by technological innovation while going scorched earth against competitors and detractors. They would both rightly be in history books, but should be understood as the opaque figures that they are. The same can be said for practically all of the most successful business people. John D. Rockefeller, Andrew Mellon, and J.P. Morgan didn't accumulate wealth and power by being saints (in fact, one could easily argue that setting morality/upright ethics aside is a must in gathering power).
|
|
|
|