• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:30
CEST 01:30
KST 08:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Rollback Netcode in Brood War685.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202621Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78
StarCraft 2
General
ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development 5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
Rollback Netcode in Brood War BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Ziemie's Starcraft 1 Prequel Campaign Mineral Boosting (2 workers/patch)
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 12629 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 291

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 289 290 291 292 293 6010 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44374 Posts
June 14 2018 03:30 GMT
#5801
Trump on North Korea
No dictatorship has oppressed its people more brutally or more cruelly than North Korea

Also Trump on North Korea
Yeah, but so have a lot of other people have done some really bad things. I mean, I could go through a lot of nations where a lot of bad things were done.

ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
June 14 2018 04:28 GMT
#5802
On June 14 2018 12:30 KwarK wrote:
Trump on North Korea
Show nested quote +
No dictatorship has oppressed its people more brutally or more cruelly than North Korea

Also Trump on North Korea
Show nested quote +
Yeah, but so have a lot of other people have done some really bad things. I mean, I could go through a lot of nations where a lot of bad things were done.


Also missing the bits where he praises Xi and Kim for having total control of their countries and being presidents/leaders for life.

But don't worry, he's totally joking.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35174 Posts
June 14 2018 04:35 GMT
#5803
On June 14 2018 13:28 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2018 12:30 KwarK wrote:
Trump on North Korea
No dictatorship has oppressed its people more brutally or more cruelly than North Korea

Also Trump on North Korea
Yeah, but so have a lot of other people have done some really bad things. I mean, I could go through a lot of nations where a lot of bad things were done.


Also missing the bits where he praises Xi and Kim for having total control of their countries and being presidents/leaders for life.

But don't worry, he's totally joking.

Don't take him literally, unless it's a campaign promise you want fulfilled.
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
June 14 2018 06:29 GMT
#5804
On June 14 2018 13:35 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2018 13:28 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On June 14 2018 12:30 KwarK wrote:
Trump on North Korea
No dictatorship has oppressed its people more brutally or more cruelly than North Korea

Also Trump on North Korea
Yeah, but so have a lot of other people have done some really bad things. I mean, I could go through a lot of nations where a lot of bad things were done.


Also missing the bits where he praises Xi and Kim for having total control of their countries and being presidents/leaders for life.

But don't worry, he's totally joking.

Don't take him literally, unless it's a campaign promise you want fulfilled.

But take him seriously. He may not literally want to be president for life, but only because he doesn't like that title.
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Profile Blog Joined March 2013
Netherlands30548 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 08:38:44
June 14 2018 08:00 GMT
#5805
On June 14 2018 12:30 KwarK wrote:
Trump on North Korea
Show nested quote +
No dictatorship has oppressed its people more brutally or more cruelly than North Korea

Also Trump on North Korea
Show nested quote +
Yeah, but so have a lot of other people have done some really bad things. I mean, I could go through a lot of nations where a lot of bad things were done.


This might be one of the reasons that NK is making steps towards peace now. They might never find a president that cares so little about human rights and is so positive towards absolute rulers. Normally the US would want regime change and democracy and all that annoying stuff. With Trump being more interested in putting hotels on those beautiful beaches than those starving people in the labor camps, they might get the best deal they would ever be able to get: Make peace, lose the pariah status, still stay in charge, get filthy rich by selling rights to natural resources and hotel contracts, and join the worlds oligarchs without paying a price for decades of oppression. He also see's Xi make himself president for life, just like him, but without all the hate and sanctions, he even got praise from the White House for doing it. So I can imagine he would want to become more like Xi/Putin/Trump

(of course there will be many other factors like SK actively working towards reunion, China's different approach, the testsite collapsing on itself etc)
Neosteel Enthusiast
PhoenixVoid
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Canada32755 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 17:28:05
June 14 2018 17:20 GMT
#5806
The DOJ's assessment of Strozk and Page (the two FBI agents accused of being politically biased against Trump in their text messages) concluded they, "did not find that the conduct or potential political bias of FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page "directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,". The report also said Comey did deviate from procedures that cast doubt on the FBI, but nothing over political biases.

There was some hype in certain circles that this would prove the FBI had some bias against Trump, but so far nothing really shown.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/392260-doj-watchdog-does-not-fault-fbis-strzok-page-for-political-bias
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/392252-justice-department-watchdog-says-comey-deviated-from-fbi-procedures
I'm afraid of demented knife-wielding escaped lunatic libertarian zombie mutants
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
June 14 2018 17:24 GMT
#5807
I mean, not to mention that as soon as there was a whiff of anything happening with Strzok and Page, Mueller took them off the investigation. The fact that their names keep popping up on Fox News propaganda segments is rooted in nothing resembling reality.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22662 Posts
June 14 2018 17:24 GMT
#5808
On June 15 2018 02:20 PhoenixVoid wrote:
The DOJ's assessment of Strozk and Page (the two FBI agents accused of being politically biased against Trump in their text messages) concluded they, "did not find that the conduct or potential political bias of FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page "directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed,". The report also said Comey did deviate from procedures that cast doubt on the FBI when he , but nothing over political biases.

There was some hype in certain circles that this would prove the FBI had some bias against Trump, but so far nothing really shown.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/392260-doj-watchdog-does-not-fault-fbis-strzok-page-for-political-bias
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/392252-justice-department-watchdog-says-comey-deviated-from-fbi-procedures
Those circles will simply ignore the report or claim the 'deep state' protected them or whatever.

It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
crms
Profile Joined February 2010
United States11933 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 17:43:44
June 14 2018 17:41 GMT
#5809
New York is suing the Trump Foundation.

https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/attorney-general-underwood-announces-lawsuit-against-donald-j-trump-foundation-and-its

Lawsuit Seeks Restitution of $2.8 Million Plus Penalties

AG’s Office Sends Referral Letters to Internal Revenue Service and Federal Election Commission for Further Investigation and Legal Action

In Light Of Misconduct And Total Lack of Oversight, Lawsuit Seeks To Dissolve Donald J. Trump Foundation and Bar Donald J. Trump And Members Of Trump Foundation’s Board Of Directors From Serving On Board Of Any Other New York Charity




Anyone know what the 'legal actions' could be for those involved?
http://i.imgur.com/fAUOr2c.png | Fighting games are great
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 14 2018 18:16 GMT
#5810
It’s worrisome that the Justice department concealed some damaging message exchanges like “He’s never going to be president right?” “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.” This clearly crossed the line at FBI officials having and expressing political opinions. I don’t want government officials even entertaining the idea of stopping a political outcome when they’ve been entrusted with great power.

Im glad the IG found out that this facet didn’t affect the overall course of the investigation. I’m going to trust the outcome with included caveats. He didn’t try to make out that the investigation occurred without incident, just that the biases didn’t have a disastrous and course-defining impact.

The Justice department better produce requested documents from Congress in the future. Trump is being cowardly like usual in not compelling his subordinates to comply with Congress’s authority to compel their production, and not slow walk or deny requests.

Also glad that one leaking staffer that was sleeping with a reporter has been found and arrested. He’s been charged with lying to investigators.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22662 Posts
June 14 2018 18:45 GMT
#5811
The DoJ is slow in producing documents because Congress leaks like a sieve and undermines the investigation.
I'm sure they would be more willing to comply if that wasn't the case.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 14 2018 19:11 GMT
#5812
Members of the house are active trying to undermine the investigation and attack the deputy AG. Documents instantly get leaked when the justice department provides them, so there is no reason for them to do so.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 19:55:04
June 14 2018 19:25 GMT
#5813
Comparing justice department and house/senate leaking is like comparing one year olds for table manners. McCabe just got a prosecution thrown his way for doing it and having the gall to tell his underlings to get their house in order.

The good news is the FBI/intelligence agencies has been so visible doing this that ordinary Americans aren’t fooled.

Hilariously the recent IG report provides the latest instance:




Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 20:33:52
June 14 2018 20:33 GMT
#5814
The texts are meaningless. They don't "cross the line of having an opinion" because they weren't acted upon. If anything, it was the opposite.


(thread)

This is looking like a case of neglect on the part of the FBI that, if anything, cost Hillary the election, by keeping the infamous email investigation cast above her head right until the election was complete. Had they pursued the lead they had as soon as possible, she would've been cleared sooner, and all the "but her emails" could've died down a lot sooner. Complaining about the conduct of the FBI here is having your cake while eating it too.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 14 2018 20:33 GMT
#5815
The congress members that are complaining about the justice department can take the matter to their fellow congress members and pass some legislation. Other than that, it is just them grand standing to undermine the investigation. And I don’t think anything new is shocked by those revelations the IG turned up.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24387 Posts
June 14 2018 20:42 GMT
#5816
On June 15 2018 05:33 NewSunshine wrote:
The texts are meaningless. They don't "cross the line of having an opinion" because they weren't acted upon. If anything, it was the opposite.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1007345777855918082
(thread)

This is looking like a case of neglect on the part of the FBI that, if anything, cost Hillary the election, by keeping the infamous email investigation cast above her head right until the election was complete. Had they pursued the lead they had as soon as possible, she would've been cleared sooner, and all the "but her emails" could've died down a lot sooner. Complaining about the conduct of the FBI here is having your cake while eating it too.


Republicans don't care what the official story of her extreme carelessness and those weren't the emails people to her left cared about.

I don't think anyone would put the emails even in the top 10 of reasons they voted one way or another. I think the FBI is trash anyway so that's whatever, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that her getting 'cleared' sooner would have changed anything.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
June 14 2018 20:45 GMT
#5817
Clinton’s popularity did take a hit once the email investigation took hold. That thing was the golden goose for republicans, and they knew it.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 20:45:37
June 14 2018 20:45 GMT
#5818
On June 15 2018 05:42 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2018 05:33 NewSunshine wrote:
The texts are meaningless. They don't "cross the line of having an opinion" because they weren't acted upon. If anything, it was the opposite.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1007345777855918082
(thread)

This is looking like a case of neglect on the part of the FBI that, if anything, cost Hillary the election, by keeping the infamous email investigation cast above her head right until the election was complete. Had they pursued the lead they had as soon as possible, she would've been cleared sooner, and all the "but her emails" could've died down a lot sooner. Complaining about the conduct of the FBI here is having your cake while eating it too.


Republicans don't care what the official story of her extreme carelessness and those weren't the emails people to her left cared about.

I don't think anyone would put the emails even in the top 10 of reasons they voted one way or another. I think the FBI is trash anyway so that's whatever, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that her getting 'cleared' sooner would have changed anything.

The real facts don't matter to a lot of people, muddying the waters and tarnishing her image was more important. It's why you have Fox News blasting out continuous stories about various "deep state" actors that are blatantly false. Their veracity doesn't matter, the goal is to get something to stick. Having the "but her emails" fallback is also a great way to go "well if there's this thing about her emails, then how do we know they don't have a child-based sex-trafficking ring?"

If the point is that the FBI is a mess, I'm with you. But that's very clearly not the point Danglars is trying to get across here.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
June 14 2018 20:53 GMT
#5819
On June 15 2018 05:33 NewSunshine wrote:
The texts are meaningless. They don't "cross the line of having an opinion" because they weren't acted upon. If anything, it was the opposite.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1007345777855918082
(thread)

This is looking like a case of neglect on the part of the FBI that, if anything, cost Hillary the election, by keeping the infamous email investigation cast above her head right until the election was complete. Had they pursued the lead they had as soon as possible, she would've been cleared sooner, and all the "but her emails" could've died down a lot sooner. Complaining about the conduct of the FBI here is having your cake while eating it too.

I think you’d be singing a different tune if George W Bush senior FBI officials had said the same thing of a prospective Obama victory. “We’ll stop it” would be wall to wall coverage of not only a Bush scandal, but also blatant racism.

If Trump was all it took for the left to get in bed with the intelligence apparatus, then I can’t wait for what’s around the corner.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24387 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-06-14 21:01:49
June 14 2018 21:00 GMT
#5820
On June 15 2018 05:45 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 15 2018 05:42 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 15 2018 05:33 NewSunshine wrote:
The texts are meaningless. They don't "cross the line of having an opinion" because they weren't acted upon. If anything, it was the opposite.

https://twitter.com/jaketapper/status/1007345777855918082
(thread)

This is looking like a case of neglect on the part of the FBI that, if anything, cost Hillary the election, by keeping the infamous email investigation cast above her head right until the election was complete. Had they pursued the lead they had as soon as possible, she would've been cleared sooner, and all the "but her emails" could've died down a lot sooner. Complaining about the conduct of the FBI here is having your cake while eating it too.


Republicans don't care what the official story of her extreme carelessness and those weren't the emails people to her left cared about.

I don't think anyone would put the emails even in the top 10 of reasons they voted one way or another. I think the FBI is trash anyway so that's whatever, but I haven't seen anything to indicate that her getting 'cleared' sooner would have changed anything.

The real facts don't matter to a lot of people, muddying the waters and tarnishing her image was more important. It's why you have Fox News blasting out continuous stories about various "deep state" actors that are blatantly false. Their veracity doesn't matter, the goal is to get something to stick. Having the "but her emails" fallback is also a great way to go "well if there's this thing about her emails, then how do we know they don't have a child-based sex-trafficking ring?"

If the point is that the FBI is a mess, I'm with you. But that's very clearly not the point Danglars is trying to get across here.


Just addressing this part:

This is looking like a case of neglect on the part of the FBI that, if anything, cost Hillary the election, by keeping the infamous email investigation cast above her head right until the election was complete.


It doesn't look like that at all to me. Looks like typical FBI incompetence and I don't know of a single person who would have voted differently as a result. I don't think that's even in the "Trump Regrets" tweets which include people making up regrets.

So I'm fine adding it to the endless list of FBI fuckups, but it doesn't even hold up as much of a reason she lost at all, let alone a critical factor.

From Danglars:
If Trump was all it took for the left to get in bed with the intelligence apparatus, then I can’t wait for what’s around the corner.


Worst part of all this. Too bad as soon as it benefits you politically, you'll go right back to caping for the same shitty FBI.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 289 290 291 292 293 6010 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
08:00
The QMC Showmatch 1
CranKy Ducklings53
OSC
08:00
Masters Cup #151: Group A
davetesta15
Liquipedia
BSL Open Qualifier
04:00
Jungsu & Hasu #3
ZZZero.O113
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 9542
Artosis 697
ZZZero.O 113
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm185
League of Legends
Doublelift5714
JimRising 353
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe13
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby3930
Other Games
summit1g9182
FrodaN2209
Liquid`RaSZi1867
Livibee427
C9.Mang0353
Maynarde159
ArmadaUGS45
Mew2King41
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1166
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 151
• Sammyuel 34
• musti20045 32
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP16
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie1567
• Scarra1206
• Shiphtur639
Upcoming Events
OSC
12h 30m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 11h
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Online Event
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
BSL Open Qualifier
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.