• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:19
CEST 07:19
KST 14:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy2GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding3Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info
Tourneys
GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. Gypsy to Korea Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [BSL22] RO32 Group Stage
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST [BSL22] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CEST 🌍 Weekly Foreign Showmatches
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2402 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1735

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 5652 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
August 05 2019 01:04 GMT
#34681
--- Nuked ---
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23838 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 03:52:42
August 05 2019 03:43 GMT
#34682
On August 05 2019 07:43 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 06:25 Doodsmack wrote:
White nationalist terrorism must be addressed with the same zeal and hostility with which Islamic terrorism is addressed. It's not a matter of gun policy or mental health. It's a matter of fighting the terrorists, including with preemptive action. Of course the difference here is that the terrorists are american citizens, and so they have constitutional rights. That makes it tough.
ICE has no issue with locking up citizens in inhuman conditions without repercussion. No the problem is not that they are citizens, it's that they are white.

You can wish it to be different, you can hope to change it but reality is what it is. Its 'fine' that people get killed by nationalist terrorism be it 1, 10 or 100 so long as the shooter is white enough.

But on a more serious note, the solution is proper mental healthcare to identify and intervene before it gets this far.


Yup, been saying this since before Trump.

It's remarkable they manage to arrest white terrorists so frequently after they commit mass murder but struggle so hard to not shoot/kill unarmed Black people.

As for mental healthcare there's about a 1 in 3 chance the mental healthcare professional is somewhat openly sympathetic to their politics/white supremacy and/or don't see white supremacy as a problem let alone an illness. Have to remember there are still a great deal of people in this country for which white supremacy isn't bad but "the good ole days".
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
August 05 2019 04:42 GMT
#34683
Simberto is right. What is really problematic is that everyone seems to think the institutionalized practices of "mental health care" can repair an ailing social fabric.

"We need better mental healthcare."
"We need better surveillance."
"So we can medicate these fuckers before they shoot people."
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Muliphein
Profile Joined July 2019
49 Posts
August 05 2019 05:44 GMT
#34684
You guys are deluding yourself if you think that gun regulation is your main problem. It is not. The problem is that US is a mentally ill society. Bowling for Columbine tried to show that two decades ago. Right now, it is becoming much more of a problem. Add to this Trump first removing all restraints and then fanning the flames, and it gets even worse. Guns just increase the death count of these incidents. Their frequency is 100% politics.

And given that you cannot even regulate gun control, good luck solving the actual problem.

Artisreal
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany9235 Posts
August 05 2019 07:25 GMT
#34685
On August 05 2019 14:44 Muliphein wrote:
You guys are deluding yourself if you think that gun regulation is your main problem. It is not. The problem is that US is a mentally ill society. Bowling for Columbine tried to show that two decades ago. Right now, it is becoming much more of a problem. Add to this Trump first removing all restraints and then fanning the flames, and it gets even worse. Guns just increase the death count of these incidents. Their frequency is 100% politics.

And given that you cannot even regulate gun control, good luck solving the actual problem.


Ain't nothing wrong with treating symptoms while tackling the illness at the same time, aight?
passive quaranstream fan
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway8247 Posts
August 05 2019 09:24 GMT
#34686
On August 05 2019 14:44 Muliphein wrote:
You guys are deluding yourself if you think that gun regulation is your main problem. It is not. The problem is that US is a mentally ill society. Bowling for Columbine tried to show that two decades ago. Right now, it is becoming much more of a problem. Add to this Trump first removing all restraints and then fanning the flames, and it gets even worse. Guns just increase the death count of these incidents. Their frequency is 100% politics.

And given that you cannot even regulate gun control, good luck solving the actual problem.



More American exeptionalism. Like other countries also doesn't have their fair share of crazies and fucked part of their population. Americans wield this like a shield when it's convenient to excuse fixing their problems.

That's not to say America doesn't have a big issue in that area; rampant poverty, uninformed masses, bad health care, ingrown local cultural problems, etc. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't try to dampen the symptoms while simultaneously working on fixing the root problems.
PoulsenB
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland7735 Posts
August 05 2019 10:05 GMT
#34687
The more I read about the US and its healthcare, labour laws/conditions, gun violence, opioid crisis, politics etc. the more it looks like a dystopian hellscape where profit is king and lives of ordinary citizens don't matter.
IdrA fan forever <3 || the clueless one || Marci must be protected at all costs
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France8055 Posts
August 05 2019 10:28 GMT
#34688
On August 05 2019 19:05 PoulsenB wrote:
The more I read about the US and its healthcare, labour laws/conditions, gun violence, opioid crisis, politics etc. the more it looks like a dystopian hellscape where profit is king and lives of ordinary citizens don't matter.

It's a big country though, but ye, I think also that american society is seriously, seriously ill.
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28784 Posts
August 05 2019 10:59 GMT
#34689
Meh, if you look at mental illness as not just a genetic error of some kind but also something that may be triggered or entirely created by your surroundings, it's no surprise that several of the traits differentiating the US from western/southern europe might also lead to more people going a bit crazy.

By this I basically mean, more stressful and competitive work environment, more personal debt, somewhat longer working hours (although this differs from country to country in europe too, it seems fair to say americans work more hours than countries comprising 'western europe'. link), more disenfranchised media (I could probably say society tbh).. It's not to say that guns aren't a problem, obviously they are, but part of the reason why I am so negative towards the predatory capitalism partially pervading the american society is the negative effects I perceive it to have on the mental health of your citizens..

Relaxing is really important. And having stuff that lingers in the back of your head stressing you out, causing worry, over a long period of time, makes people unable to do so.

According to this, americans are among the most stressed people on the planet. While I can't provide a link to the report (behind a wall), I saw that for Norwegians, that 55% figure was 31%, and the global average was 35%.
Moderator
Pangpootata
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
1838 Posts
August 05 2019 11:32 GMT
#34690
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.
nojok
Profile Joined May 2011
France15845 Posts
August 05 2019 12:02 GMT
#34691
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.


If only your government could have thought about this before setting ablaze the Middle East.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - Kuroky - Flap Flap Wings!
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35172 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 12:12:32
August 05 2019 12:07 GMT
#34692
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.

The only way black people are involved with the current discussion of white national terrorism is if they're on the bullet end of it. Shifting the blame from white national terrorism creating shooters to black on black crime is bringing up something completely extraneous to the topic.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
August 05 2019 12:14 GMT
#34693
Have we gone full circle now? We shouldn't care about terrorism because it's a small proportional of all deaths? That's actually right.

Shame that you only care about that argument when it is white people deliberately murdering non-whites, all the while, spreading their hateful idealogy. If it's other terrorism, thousands of people dead, and wasting billions of dollars is fine it seems. The US president encouraging white supremacist terrorism. That's a OK it seems.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23838 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 12:24:13
August 05 2019 12:22 GMT
#34694
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.


White supremacy terrorists attacks account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes, but white supremacy deserves credit for a lot more than just those. Surely hundreds of years of white supremacy leading to subjugation, poverty, and criminalization for the explicit purpose of political and literal marginalization of Black people can be credited for a great deal of violence, be it Black on Black or otherwise.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ryzel
Profile Joined December 2012
United States547 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 13:16:37
August 05 2019 12:40 GMT
#34695
@GH, I get your point but the mental health field isn’t exactly a financially lucrative one where people are getting into it all the time for the wrong reasons (unlike medical health). Psychiatrists can make bank prescribing drugs after a bajillion years of schooling and supervision requirements, but there are many more in-home therapists and mental health counselors that make between 30-40k annually. Not to mention a pretty decent chunk of these aren’t even white. Being generous to you, I’d say that ratio is closer to 1 out of 20-30.

@Mental Health discussion, I agree people don’t know what they’re talking about (not saying this to be mean, just a fact).

Study analyzing involuntary outpatient commitment as a means to counter mass shootings: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298526/

Key snippet:
+ Show Spoiler +
The Contested Relationship between Violence and Mental Illness

Although proposed OPC (outpatient commitment) statutes tap into public fear about the potential for violence among persons with mental illness, serious violent acts by persons with severe mental illness are uncommon. Major psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia and mood disorders, by themselves, contribute relatively little—about 4%—to the overall risk of interpersonal violence in the population, and most perpetrators of commonplace violent acts do not have serious psychopathology. Studies indicate that although there is a slightly elevated risk of violence in persons with severe mental illness, such serious acts are still rare. The factors that contribute to violence in the mentally ill are often as varied and complex as those in the general population. In fact, it has been demonstrated that persons with mental illness are more frequently subjected to physical or sexual victimization, and these experiences compounded by other psychosocial factors may increase the risk of violence perpetration in these populations.

A study of patients with mental illness found that the factors associated with violence included a history of violent victimization, homelessness, cohabitation, exposure to community violence, substance abuse, poor mental health status, and a history of psychiatric hospitalisation. None of these risk factors, alone, explained an elevated risk, and patients with one or none of these risk factors had violence risks equal to that of the general population without mental illness. Addition of a second risk factor doubled the risk of violence, and those with 3 or more risk factors were most likely to be violent, indicating that the risks for violent behaviour are multifactorial and compounded by social factors throughout the life course.

However, the prospect of a violent act by a person with a severe mental illness generates grave public concern and fear, which is often compounded by media coverage of these acts. Clinicians are faced with increasing legal liability and responsibility for the actions and behaviours of their inadequately treated or noncompliant patients, adding to concerns about the risk of violence among their patients. Such concerns negatively affect the care of a disenfranchised population while stoking an existing stigma and fear surrounding mental illness. These patients are often high users of services often requiring involuntary commitment, but psychiatrists are often limited in their ability to care for these patients due to lack of sufficient intensive outpatient services.

Some of the controversy over OPC involves the potential for violence by persons with severe mental illness and how inflated views of violence potential fuels stigmatizing views of mental illness. Attitude surveys in the United States reliably document the popular belief that mental illness ‘causes’ violence and the strong correlation of this belief with public endorsement of the use of legal mandates to require treatment adherence. Drawing on public opinion, political advocates of OPC in recent years have ‘sold’ OPC by capitalizing on the publicity surrounding sensational acts of violence by people with mental disorders—explicitly promoting involuntary outpatient treatment as a needed measure to ensure public safety. But even proponents of OPC express caution about OPC’s public safety promise. Indeed, the recent resource document on OPC developed by the American Psychiatric Association states, “The goal of involuntary outpatient commitment is to mobilise appropriate treatment resources, enhance their effectiveness and improve an individual’s adherence to the treatment plan. Involuntary outpatient commitment should not be considered as a primary tool to prevent acts of violence” (emphasis added by the article). Despite these cautions about assigning OPC the task of violence prevention, the recent scourge of mass shootings in the United States have led many US lawmakers, wary of the powerful gun lobby, to implicate mental illness as the chief cause of gun violence in the United States.


Also keep in mind, this is for people that have already committed crimes and then are mandated treatment. Most of these shooters have committed no prior crimes, meaning the state would have to forcing treatment on people that haven’t done anything wrong. Although fun fact, the Virginia Tech shooter in 2007 was undergoing involuntary outpatient treatment at the time, but was noncompliant with the order and it was not enforced (learned that from the Harvard article below).

All that being said, if there were substantially more community-based mental health outreach programs focusing on things like inclusiveness and social skills training, including in schools as early as grades K-8, we might see some real progress. But as far as trying to identify potential shooters and force them into mental health treatment...probably not so much.

Further Reading

Study saying involuntary outpatient commitment less restrictive than inpatient psychiatric hospital commitment, but flawed in its current implementation: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1340.pdf

MHA (Mental Health America, community-based non-profit mental health provider) condemning involuntary mental health treatment and reasons why: https://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/positions/involuntary-treatment

Brief overview of involuntary outpatient commitment from Harvard Mental Health: https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/Involuntary_outpatient_commitment
Hakuna Matata B*tches
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23838 Posts
August 05 2019 12:58 GMT
#34696
On August 05 2019 21:40 Ryzel wrote:
@GH, I get your point but the mental health field isn’t exactly a financially lucrative one where people are getting into it all the time for the wrong reasons (unlike medical health). Psychiatrists can make bank prescribing drugs after a bajillion years of schooling and supervision requirements, but there are many more in-home therapists and mental health counselors that make between 30-40k annually. Not to mention a pretty decent chunk of these aren’t even white. Being generous to you, I’d say that ratio is closer to 1 out of 20-30.

@Mental Health discussion, I agree people don’t know what they’re talking about (not saying this to be mean, just a fact).

Study analyzing involuntary outpatient commitment as a means to counter mass shootings: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298526/

Key snippet:
+ Show Spoiler +
The Contested Relationship between Violence and Mental Illness

Although proposed OPC (outpatient commitment) statutes tap into public fear about the potential for violence among persons with mental illness, serious violent acts by persons with severe mental illness are uncommon. Major psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia and mood disorders, by themselves, contribute relatively little—about 4%—to the overall risk of interpersonal violence in the population, and most perpetrators of commonplace violent acts do not have serious psychopathology. Studies indicate that although there is a slightly elevated risk of violence in persons with severe mental illness, such serious acts are still rare. The factors that contribute to violence in the mentally ill are often as varied and complex as those in the general population. In fact, it has been demonstrated that persons with mental illness are more frequently subjected to physical or sexual victimization, and these experiences compounded by other psychosocial factors may increase the risk of violence perpetration in these populations.

A study of patients with mental illness found that the factors associated with violence included a history of violent victimization, homelessness, cohabitation, exposure to community violence, substance abuse, poor mental health status, and a history of psychiatric hospitalisation. None of these risk factors, alone, explained an elevated risk, and patients with one or none of these risk factors had violence risks equal to that of the general population without mental illness. Addition of a second risk factor doubled the risk of violence, and those with 3 or more risk factors were most likely to be violent, indicating that the risks for violent behaviour are multifactorial and compounded by social factors throughout the life course.

However, the prospect of a violent act by a person with a severe mental illness generates grave public concern and fear, which is often compounded by media coverage of these acts. Clinicians are faced with increasing legal liability and responsibility for the actions and behaviours of their inadequately treated or noncompliant patients, adding to concerns about the risk of violence among their patients. Such concerns negatively affect the care of a disenfranchised population while stoking an existing stigma and fear surrounding mental illness. These patients are often high users of services often requiring involuntary commitment, but psychiatrists are often limited in their ability to care for these patients due to lack of sufficient intensive outpatient services.

Some of the controversy over OPC involves the potential for violence by persons with severe mental illness and how inflated views of violence potential fuels stigmatizing views of mental illness. Attitude surveys in the United States reliably document the popular belief that mental illness ‘causes’ violence and the strong correlation of this belief with public endorsement of the use of legal mandates to require treatment adherence. Drawing on public opinion, political advocates of OPC in recent years have ‘sold’ OPC by capitalizing on the publicity surrounding sensational acts of violence by people with mental disorders—explicitly promoting involuntary outpatient treatment as a needed measure to ensure public safety. But even proponents of OPC express caution about OPC’s public safety promise. Indeed, the recent resource document on OPC developed by the American Psychiatric Association states, “The goal of involuntary outpatient commitment is to mobilise appropriate treatment resources, enhance their effectiveness and improve an individual’s adherence to the treatment plan. Involuntary outpatient commitment should not be considered as a primary tool to prevent acts of violence” (emphasis added by the article). Despite these cautions about assigning OPC the task of violence prevention, the recent scourge of mass shootings in the United States have led many US lawmakers, wary of the powerful gun lobby, to implicate mental illness as the chief cause of gun violence in the United States.


Also keep in mind, this is for people that have already committed crimes and then are mandated treatment. Most of these shooters have committed no prior crimes, meaning the state would have to forcing treatment on people that haven’t done anything wrong. Although fun fact, the Virginia Tech shooter in 2007 was undergoing involuntary outpatient treatment at the time, but was noncompliant with the order and it was not enforced (learned that from the Harvard article below).

All that being said, if there were substantially more community-based mental health outreach programs focusing on things like inclusiveness and social skills training, including in schools as early as grades K-8, we might see some real progress. But as far as trying to identify potential shooters and force them into mental health treatment...probably not so much.

Further Reading

Study saying involuntary outpatient commitment less restrictive than inpatient psychiatric hospital commitment, but flawed in its current implementation: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1340.pdf

MHA (Mental Health America, community-based non-profit mental health provider) condoning involuntary mental health treatment and reasons why: https://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/positions/involuntary-treatment

Brief overview of involuntary outpatient commitment from Harvard Mental Health: https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/Involuntary_outpatient_commitment


There was a study a bit back that showed it's about 1/4 of psychiatrists are Republican. I agree non-doctor mental health professionals are probably less Republican/sympathetic to white supremacy.

As far as being white, they don't have to be white to be sympathetic to white supremacy.

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ryzel
Profile Joined December 2012
United States547 Posts
August 05 2019 13:11 GMT
#34697
On August 05 2019 21:58 GreenHorizons wrote:

As far as being white, they don't have to be white to be sympathetic to white supremacy.



This is true, but they are significantly less likely. The point I was trying to make was that your post implies that 1/3rd of the mental health field is sympathetic to white supremacy and I don’t believe that ratio is anywhere close to accurate, with the caveat that if you’re limiting the mental health field to those making 200k+ a year it becomes much closer to reality.
Hakuna Matata B*tches
Pangpootata
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
1838 Posts
August 05 2019 13:26 GMT
#34698
On August 05 2019 21:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.


White supremacy terrorists attacks account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes, but white supremacy deserves credit for a lot more than just those. Surely hundreds of years of white supremacy leading to subjugation, poverty, and criminalization for the explicit purpose of political and literal marginalization of Black people can be credited for a great deal of violence, be it Black on Black or otherwise.


A)
Look at the violence and lack of human rights in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparatively, blacks in the US have a much better and less violent life. Of course slavery was bad for them during that particular time period, but if you look at history as a whole, the blacks in the US are much better off than those in Africa.

B)
Many other ethnic groups have been subjugated by whites, e.g. Indians by the British, Vietnamese by the French, etc. I don't see them having high rates of violence against each other. It is a leap of logic to blame black violence on past treatment by whites.

C)
Only 1.6% of the population were slave owners at the height of slavery. The average white whose ancestors were average working class people and not rich slave owners. But genetically black have around 10%-50% of European genes, varying greatly by state. Example study: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This is due to slave owners breeding (raping) their slaves. The fact we must face is that blacks are the descendants of both slave owners and slaves. And more so the descendants of slave owners than the average white.
Ayaz2810
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2763 Posts
August 05 2019 13:28 GMT
#34699
On August 05 2019 07:43 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 06:25 Doodsmack wrote:
White nationalist terrorism must be addressed with the same zeal and hostility with which Islamic terrorism is addressed. It's not a matter of gun policy or mental health. It's a matter of fighting the terrorists, including with preemptive action. Of course the difference here is that the terrorists are american citizens, and so they have constitutional rights. That makes it tough.
ICE has no issue with locking up citizens in inhuman conditions without repercussion. No the problem is not that they are citizens, it's that they are white.

You can wish it to be different, you can hope to change it but reality is what it is. Its 'fine' that people get killed by nationalist terrorism be it 1, 10 or 100 so long as the shooter is white enough.

But on a more serious note, the solution is proper mental healthcare to identify and intervene before it gets this far.


No. Just... no. "But their mental health!" is a cop out and bullshit. If these guys are mentally ill, then I guess I was a psychopath in the army. The military fights against enemies designated by the United States Government. These guys are doing literally the same thing. They are not, by and large, crazy people so much as they are fighting against their "enemy" as designated by the United States Government (Trump and his sycophants). Please, and I mean this genuinely, give deep consideration to how these events are being primed and carried out, and by whom, before we jump on the mental illness train.
Vrtra Vanquisher/Tiamat Trouncer/World Serpent Slayer
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23838 Posts
August 05 2019 13:30 GMT
#34700
On August 05 2019 22:11 Ryzel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 21:58 GreenHorizons wrote:

As far as being white, they don't have to be white to be sympathetic to white supremacy.



This is true, but they are significantly less likely. The point I was trying to make was that your post implies that 1/3rd of the mental health field is sympathetic to white supremacy and I don’t believe that ratio is anywhere close to accurate, with the caveat that if you’re limiting the mental health field to those making 200k+ a year it becomes much closer to reality.


Lots of poor people and POC are sympathetic to white supremacy. Internalized oppression is a lot more common than many people realize. That said, I didn't mean it as an indictment of the mental health field in general (though there's plenty I could be complaining about regarding it), just our society and that white supremacy isn't only KKK hoods and terrorist attacks.

Phrenology, Physiognomy, etc... white supremacy has always been a part of the field (like everything else in the US)
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 5652 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
CranKy Ducklings
00:00
TLMC #22: Map Judging #2
CranKy Ducklings43
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 101
ROOTCatZ 76
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 6867
firebathero 683
Pusan 196
Tasteless 171
Leta 155
Icarus 11
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm100
League of Legends
JimRising 717
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K751
Other Games
summit1g10346
C9.Mang0486
PiGStarcraft208
Maynarde82
Mew2King78
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV169
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH189
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1288
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Team League
5h 41m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 4h
WardiTV Team League
1d 5h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 9h
BSL
1d 13h
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Team League
2 days
OSC
2 days
BSL
2 days
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
GSL
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.