• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:47
CET 22:47
KST 06:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 100SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-1819Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises3Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Dec 22-28): Classic & MaxPax win, Percival surprises SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Starcraft 2 Zerg Coach ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship WardiTV Mondays $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 506 Warp Zone Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play
Brood War
General
A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone I would like to say something about StarCraft StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ (UMS) SWITCHEROO *New* /Destination Edit/
Tourneys
SLON Grand Finals – Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Elden Ring Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI 12 Days of Starcraft
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1750 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1735

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 5399 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
August 05 2019 01:04 GMT
#34681
--- Nuked ---
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23520 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 03:52:42
August 05 2019 03:43 GMT
#34682
On August 05 2019 07:43 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 06:25 Doodsmack wrote:
White nationalist terrorism must be addressed with the same zeal and hostility with which Islamic terrorism is addressed. It's not a matter of gun policy or mental health. It's a matter of fighting the terrorists, including with preemptive action. Of course the difference here is that the terrorists are american citizens, and so they have constitutional rights. That makes it tough.
ICE has no issue with locking up citizens in inhuman conditions without repercussion. No the problem is not that they are citizens, it's that they are white.

You can wish it to be different, you can hope to change it but reality is what it is. Its 'fine' that people get killed by nationalist terrorism be it 1, 10 or 100 so long as the shooter is white enough.

But on a more serious note, the solution is proper mental healthcare to identify and intervene before it gets this far.


Yup, been saying this since before Trump.

It's remarkable they manage to arrest white terrorists so frequently after they commit mass murder but struggle so hard to not shoot/kill unarmed Black people.

As for mental healthcare there's about a 1 in 3 chance the mental healthcare professional is somewhat openly sympathetic to their politics/white supremacy and/or don't see white supremacy as a problem let alone an illness. Have to remember there are still a great deal of people in this country for which white supremacy isn't bad but "the good ole days".
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
August 05 2019 04:42 GMT
#34683
Simberto is right. What is really problematic is that everyone seems to think the institutionalized practices of "mental health care" can repair an ailing social fabric.

"We need better mental healthcare."
"We need better surveillance."
"So we can medicate these fuckers before they shoot people."
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Muliphein
Profile Joined July 2019
49 Posts
August 05 2019 05:44 GMT
#34684
You guys are deluding yourself if you think that gun regulation is your main problem. It is not. The problem is that US is a mentally ill society. Bowling for Columbine tried to show that two decades ago. Right now, it is becoming much more of a problem. Add to this Trump first removing all restraints and then fanning the flames, and it gets even worse. Guns just increase the death count of these incidents. Their frequency is 100% politics.

And given that you cannot even regulate gun control, good luck solving the actual problem.

Artisreal
Profile Joined June 2009
Germany9235 Posts
August 05 2019 07:25 GMT
#34685
On August 05 2019 14:44 Muliphein wrote:
You guys are deluding yourself if you think that gun regulation is your main problem. It is not. The problem is that US is a mentally ill society. Bowling for Columbine tried to show that two decades ago. Right now, it is becoming much more of a problem. Add to this Trump first removing all restraints and then fanning the flames, and it gets even worse. Guns just increase the death count of these incidents. Their frequency is 100% politics.

And given that you cannot even regulate gun control, good luck solving the actual problem.


Ain't nothing wrong with treating symptoms while tackling the illness at the same time, aight?
passive quaranstream fan
Excludos
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Norway8229 Posts
August 05 2019 09:24 GMT
#34686
On August 05 2019 14:44 Muliphein wrote:
You guys are deluding yourself if you think that gun regulation is your main problem. It is not. The problem is that US is a mentally ill society. Bowling for Columbine tried to show that two decades ago. Right now, it is becoming much more of a problem. Add to this Trump first removing all restraints and then fanning the flames, and it gets even worse. Guns just increase the death count of these incidents. Their frequency is 100% politics.

And given that you cannot even regulate gun control, good luck solving the actual problem.



More American exeptionalism. Like other countries also doesn't have their fair share of crazies and fucked part of their population. Americans wield this like a shield when it's convenient to excuse fixing their problems.

That's not to say America doesn't have a big issue in that area; rampant poverty, uninformed masses, bad health care, ingrown local cultural problems, etc. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't try to dampen the symptoms while simultaneously working on fixing the root problems.
PoulsenB
Profile Joined June 2011
Poland7712 Posts
August 05 2019 10:05 GMT
#34687
The more I read about the US and its healthcare, labour laws/conditions, gun violence, opioid crisis, politics etc. the more it looks like a dystopian hellscape where profit is king and lives of ordinary citizens don't matter.
IdrA fan forever <3 || the clueless one || Marci must be protected at all costs
Biff The Understudy
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
France7930 Posts
August 05 2019 10:28 GMT
#34688
On August 05 2019 19:05 PoulsenB wrote:
The more I read about the US and its healthcare, labour laws/conditions, gun violence, opioid crisis, politics etc. the more it looks like a dystopian hellscape where profit is king and lives of ordinary citizens don't matter.

It's a big country though, but ye, I think also that american society is seriously, seriously ill.
The fellow who is out to burn things up is the counterpart of the fool who thinks he can save the world. The world needs neither to be burned up nor to be saved. The world is, we are. Transients, if we buck it; here to stay if we accept it. ~H.Miller
Liquid`Drone
Profile Joined September 2002
Norway28728 Posts
August 05 2019 10:59 GMT
#34689
Meh, if you look at mental illness as not just a genetic error of some kind but also something that may be triggered or entirely created by your surroundings, it's no surprise that several of the traits differentiating the US from western/southern europe might also lead to more people going a bit crazy.

By this I basically mean, more stressful and competitive work environment, more personal debt, somewhat longer working hours (although this differs from country to country in europe too, it seems fair to say americans work more hours than countries comprising 'western europe'. link), more disenfranchised media (I could probably say society tbh).. It's not to say that guns aren't a problem, obviously they are, but part of the reason why I am so negative towards the predatory capitalism partially pervading the american society is the negative effects I perceive it to have on the mental health of your citizens..

Relaxing is really important. And having stuff that lingers in the back of your head stressing you out, causing worry, over a long period of time, makes people unable to do so.

According to this, americans are among the most stressed people on the planet. While I can't provide a link to the report (behind a wall), I saw that for Norwegians, that 55% figure was 31%, and the global average was 35%.
Moderator
Pangpootata
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
1838 Posts
August 05 2019 11:32 GMT
#34690
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.
nojok
Profile Joined May 2011
France15845 Posts
August 05 2019 12:02 GMT
#34691
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.


If only your government could have thought about this before setting ablaze the Middle East.
"Back then teams that won were credited, now it's called throw. I think it's sad." - Kuroky - Flap Flap Wings!
Gahlo
Profile Joined February 2010
United States35165 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 12:12:32
August 05 2019 12:07 GMT
#34692
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.

The only way black people are involved with the current discussion of white national terrorism is if they're on the bullet end of it. Shifting the blame from white national terrorism creating shooters to black on black crime is bringing up something completely extraneous to the topic.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
August 05 2019 12:14 GMT
#34693
Have we gone full circle now? We shouldn't care about terrorism because it's a small proportional of all deaths? That's actually right.

Shame that you only care about that argument when it is white people deliberately murdering non-whites, all the while, spreading their hateful idealogy. If it's other terrorism, thousands of people dead, and wasting billions of dollars is fine it seems. The US president encouraging white supremacist terrorism. That's a OK it seems.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23520 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 12:24:13
August 05 2019 12:22 GMT
#34694
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.


White supremacy terrorists attacks account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes, but white supremacy deserves credit for a lot more than just those. Surely hundreds of years of white supremacy leading to subjugation, poverty, and criminalization for the explicit purpose of political and literal marginalization of Black people can be credited for a great deal of violence, be it Black on Black or otherwise.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ryzel
Profile Joined December 2012
United States540 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-08-05 13:16:37
August 05 2019 12:40 GMT
#34695
@GH, I get your point but the mental health field isn’t exactly a financially lucrative one where people are getting into it all the time for the wrong reasons (unlike medical health). Psychiatrists can make bank prescribing drugs after a bajillion years of schooling and supervision requirements, but there are many more in-home therapists and mental health counselors that make between 30-40k annually. Not to mention a pretty decent chunk of these aren’t even white. Being generous to you, I’d say that ratio is closer to 1 out of 20-30.

@Mental Health discussion, I agree people don’t know what they’re talking about (not saying this to be mean, just a fact).

Study analyzing involuntary outpatient commitment as a means to counter mass shootings: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298526/

Key snippet:
+ Show Spoiler +
The Contested Relationship between Violence and Mental Illness

Although proposed OPC (outpatient commitment) statutes tap into public fear about the potential for violence among persons with mental illness, serious violent acts by persons with severe mental illness are uncommon. Major psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia and mood disorders, by themselves, contribute relatively little—about 4%—to the overall risk of interpersonal violence in the population, and most perpetrators of commonplace violent acts do not have serious psychopathology. Studies indicate that although there is a slightly elevated risk of violence in persons with severe mental illness, such serious acts are still rare. The factors that contribute to violence in the mentally ill are often as varied and complex as those in the general population. In fact, it has been demonstrated that persons with mental illness are more frequently subjected to physical or sexual victimization, and these experiences compounded by other psychosocial factors may increase the risk of violence perpetration in these populations.

A study of patients with mental illness found that the factors associated with violence included a history of violent victimization, homelessness, cohabitation, exposure to community violence, substance abuse, poor mental health status, and a history of psychiatric hospitalisation. None of these risk factors, alone, explained an elevated risk, and patients with one or none of these risk factors had violence risks equal to that of the general population without mental illness. Addition of a second risk factor doubled the risk of violence, and those with 3 or more risk factors were most likely to be violent, indicating that the risks for violent behaviour are multifactorial and compounded by social factors throughout the life course.

However, the prospect of a violent act by a person with a severe mental illness generates grave public concern and fear, which is often compounded by media coverage of these acts. Clinicians are faced with increasing legal liability and responsibility for the actions and behaviours of their inadequately treated or noncompliant patients, adding to concerns about the risk of violence among their patients. Such concerns negatively affect the care of a disenfranchised population while stoking an existing stigma and fear surrounding mental illness. These patients are often high users of services often requiring involuntary commitment, but psychiatrists are often limited in their ability to care for these patients due to lack of sufficient intensive outpatient services.

Some of the controversy over OPC involves the potential for violence by persons with severe mental illness and how inflated views of violence potential fuels stigmatizing views of mental illness. Attitude surveys in the United States reliably document the popular belief that mental illness ‘causes’ violence and the strong correlation of this belief with public endorsement of the use of legal mandates to require treatment adherence. Drawing on public opinion, political advocates of OPC in recent years have ‘sold’ OPC by capitalizing on the publicity surrounding sensational acts of violence by people with mental disorders—explicitly promoting involuntary outpatient treatment as a needed measure to ensure public safety. But even proponents of OPC express caution about OPC’s public safety promise. Indeed, the recent resource document on OPC developed by the American Psychiatric Association states, “The goal of involuntary outpatient commitment is to mobilise appropriate treatment resources, enhance their effectiveness and improve an individual’s adherence to the treatment plan. Involuntary outpatient commitment should not be considered as a primary tool to prevent acts of violence” (emphasis added by the article). Despite these cautions about assigning OPC the task of violence prevention, the recent scourge of mass shootings in the United States have led many US lawmakers, wary of the powerful gun lobby, to implicate mental illness as the chief cause of gun violence in the United States.


Also keep in mind, this is for people that have already committed crimes and then are mandated treatment. Most of these shooters have committed no prior crimes, meaning the state would have to forcing treatment on people that haven’t done anything wrong. Although fun fact, the Virginia Tech shooter in 2007 was undergoing involuntary outpatient treatment at the time, but was noncompliant with the order and it was not enforced (learned that from the Harvard article below).

All that being said, if there were substantially more community-based mental health outreach programs focusing on things like inclusiveness and social skills training, including in schools as early as grades K-8, we might see some real progress. But as far as trying to identify potential shooters and force them into mental health treatment...probably not so much.

Further Reading

Study saying involuntary outpatient commitment less restrictive than inpatient psychiatric hospital commitment, but flawed in its current implementation: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1340.pdf

MHA (Mental Health America, community-based non-profit mental health provider) condemning involuntary mental health treatment and reasons why: https://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/positions/involuntary-treatment

Brief overview of involuntary outpatient commitment from Harvard Mental Health: https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/Involuntary_outpatient_commitment
Hakuna Matata B*tches
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23520 Posts
August 05 2019 12:58 GMT
#34696
On August 05 2019 21:40 Ryzel wrote:
@GH, I get your point but the mental health field isn’t exactly a financially lucrative one where people are getting into it all the time for the wrong reasons (unlike medical health). Psychiatrists can make bank prescribing drugs after a bajillion years of schooling and supervision requirements, but there are many more in-home therapists and mental health counselors that make between 30-40k annually. Not to mention a pretty decent chunk of these aren’t even white. Being generous to you, I’d say that ratio is closer to 1 out of 20-30.

@Mental Health discussion, I agree people don’t know what they’re talking about (not saying this to be mean, just a fact).

Study analyzing involuntary outpatient commitment as a means to counter mass shootings: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5298526/

Key snippet:
+ Show Spoiler +
The Contested Relationship between Violence and Mental Illness

Although proposed OPC (outpatient commitment) statutes tap into public fear about the potential for violence among persons with mental illness, serious violent acts by persons with severe mental illness are uncommon. Major psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia and mood disorders, by themselves, contribute relatively little—about 4%—to the overall risk of interpersonal violence in the population, and most perpetrators of commonplace violent acts do not have serious psychopathology. Studies indicate that although there is a slightly elevated risk of violence in persons with severe mental illness, such serious acts are still rare. The factors that contribute to violence in the mentally ill are often as varied and complex as those in the general population. In fact, it has been demonstrated that persons with mental illness are more frequently subjected to physical or sexual victimization, and these experiences compounded by other psychosocial factors may increase the risk of violence perpetration in these populations.

A study of patients with mental illness found that the factors associated with violence included a history of violent victimization, homelessness, cohabitation, exposure to community violence, substance abuse, poor mental health status, and a history of psychiatric hospitalisation. None of these risk factors, alone, explained an elevated risk, and patients with one or none of these risk factors had violence risks equal to that of the general population without mental illness. Addition of a second risk factor doubled the risk of violence, and those with 3 or more risk factors were most likely to be violent, indicating that the risks for violent behaviour are multifactorial and compounded by social factors throughout the life course.

However, the prospect of a violent act by a person with a severe mental illness generates grave public concern and fear, which is often compounded by media coverage of these acts. Clinicians are faced with increasing legal liability and responsibility for the actions and behaviours of their inadequately treated or noncompliant patients, adding to concerns about the risk of violence among their patients. Such concerns negatively affect the care of a disenfranchised population while stoking an existing stigma and fear surrounding mental illness. These patients are often high users of services often requiring involuntary commitment, but psychiatrists are often limited in their ability to care for these patients due to lack of sufficient intensive outpatient services.

Some of the controversy over OPC involves the potential for violence by persons with severe mental illness and how inflated views of violence potential fuels stigmatizing views of mental illness. Attitude surveys in the United States reliably document the popular belief that mental illness ‘causes’ violence and the strong correlation of this belief with public endorsement of the use of legal mandates to require treatment adherence. Drawing on public opinion, political advocates of OPC in recent years have ‘sold’ OPC by capitalizing on the publicity surrounding sensational acts of violence by people with mental disorders—explicitly promoting involuntary outpatient treatment as a needed measure to ensure public safety. But even proponents of OPC express caution about OPC’s public safety promise. Indeed, the recent resource document on OPC developed by the American Psychiatric Association states, “The goal of involuntary outpatient commitment is to mobilise appropriate treatment resources, enhance their effectiveness and improve an individual’s adherence to the treatment plan. Involuntary outpatient commitment should not be considered as a primary tool to prevent acts of violence” (emphasis added by the article). Despite these cautions about assigning OPC the task of violence prevention, the recent scourge of mass shootings in the United States have led many US lawmakers, wary of the powerful gun lobby, to implicate mental illness as the chief cause of gun violence in the United States.


Also keep in mind, this is for people that have already committed crimes and then are mandated treatment. Most of these shooters have committed no prior crimes, meaning the state would have to forcing treatment on people that haven’t done anything wrong. Although fun fact, the Virginia Tech shooter in 2007 was undergoing involuntary outpatient treatment at the time, but was noncompliant with the order and it was not enforced (learned that from the Harvard article below).

All that being said, if there were substantially more community-based mental health outreach programs focusing on things like inclusiveness and social skills training, including in schools as early as grades K-8, we might see some real progress. But as far as trying to identify potential shooters and force them into mental health treatment...probably not so much.

Further Reading

Study saying involuntary outpatient commitment less restrictive than inpatient psychiatric hospital commitment, but flawed in its current implementation: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR1340.pdf

MHA (Mental Health America, community-based non-profit mental health provider) condoning involuntary mental health treatment and reasons why: https://www.mentalhealthamerica.net/positions/involuntary-treatment

Brief overview of involuntary outpatient commitment from Harvard Mental Health: https://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletter_article/Involuntary_outpatient_commitment


There was a study a bit back that showed it's about 1/4 of psychiatrists are Republican. I agree non-doctor mental health professionals are probably less Republican/sympathetic to white supremacy.

As far as being white, they don't have to be white to be sympathetic to white supremacy.

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Ryzel
Profile Joined December 2012
United States540 Posts
August 05 2019 13:11 GMT
#34697
On August 05 2019 21:58 GreenHorizons wrote:

As far as being white, they don't have to be white to be sympathetic to white supremacy.



This is true, but they are significantly less likely. The point I was trying to make was that your post implies that 1/3rd of the mental health field is sympathetic to white supremacy and I don’t believe that ratio is anywhere close to accurate, with the caveat that if you’re limiting the mental health field to those making 200k+ a year it becomes much closer to reality.
Hakuna Matata B*tches
Pangpootata
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
1838 Posts
August 05 2019 13:26 GMT
#34698
On August 05 2019 21:22 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 20:32 Pangpootata wrote:
Gun-related deaths in the US by year (Source: Wikimedia, from National Safety Council)
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Although mass shootings have been on the rise, they are merely a drop in the ocean compared to homicides and cannot explain the overall increasing trend. White supremacists account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes. Majority of it is black on black violence.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1980 to 2008, 84% of white homicide victims were killed by white offenders and 93% of black homicide victims were killed by black offenders.

With regards to gun violence, intraracial homicide within communities is the main problem.


White supremacy terrorists attacks account for a tiny percentage of gun crimes, but white supremacy deserves credit for a lot more than just those. Surely hundreds of years of white supremacy leading to subjugation, poverty, and criminalization for the explicit purpose of political and literal marginalization of Black people can be credited for a great deal of violence, be it Black on Black or otherwise.


A)
Look at the violence and lack of human rights in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparatively, blacks in the US have a much better and less violent life. Of course slavery was bad for them during that particular time period, but if you look at history as a whole, the blacks in the US are much better off than those in Africa.

B)
Many other ethnic groups have been subjugated by whites, e.g. Indians by the British, Vietnamese by the French, etc. I don't see them having high rates of violence against each other. It is a leap of logic to blame black violence on past treatment by whites.

C)
Only 1.6% of the population were slave owners at the height of slavery. The average white whose ancestors were average working class people and not rich slave owners. But genetically black have around 10%-50% of European genes, varying greatly by state. Example study: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
This is due to slave owners breeding (raping) their slaves. The fact we must face is that blacks are the descendants of both slave owners and slaves. And more so the descendants of slave owners than the average white.
Ayaz2810
Profile Joined September 2011
United States2763 Posts
August 05 2019 13:28 GMT
#34699
On August 05 2019 07:43 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 06:25 Doodsmack wrote:
White nationalist terrorism must be addressed with the same zeal and hostility with which Islamic terrorism is addressed. It's not a matter of gun policy or mental health. It's a matter of fighting the terrorists, including with preemptive action. Of course the difference here is that the terrorists are american citizens, and so they have constitutional rights. That makes it tough.
ICE has no issue with locking up citizens in inhuman conditions without repercussion. No the problem is not that they are citizens, it's that they are white.

You can wish it to be different, you can hope to change it but reality is what it is. Its 'fine' that people get killed by nationalist terrorism be it 1, 10 or 100 so long as the shooter is white enough.

But on a more serious note, the solution is proper mental healthcare to identify and intervene before it gets this far.


No. Just... no. "But their mental health!" is a cop out and bullshit. If these guys are mentally ill, then I guess I was a psychopath in the army. The military fights against enemies designated by the United States Government. These guys are doing literally the same thing. They are not, by and large, crazy people so much as they are fighting against their "enemy" as designated by the United States Government (Trump and his sycophants). Please, and I mean this genuinely, give deep consideration to how these events are being primed and carried out, and by whom, before we jump on the mental illness train.
Vrtra Vanquisher/Tiamat Trouncer/World Serpent Slayer
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23520 Posts
August 05 2019 13:30 GMT
#34700
On August 05 2019 22:11 Ryzel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 05 2019 21:58 GreenHorizons wrote:

As far as being white, they don't have to be white to be sympathetic to white supremacy.



This is true, but they are significantly less likely. The point I was trying to make was that your post implies that 1/3rd of the mental health field is sympathetic to white supremacy and I don’t believe that ratio is anywhere close to accurate, with the caveat that if you’re limiting the mental health field to those making 200k+ a year it becomes much closer to reality.


Lots of poor people and POC are sympathetic to white supremacy. Internalized oppression is a lot more common than many people realize. That said, I didn't mean it as an indictment of the mental health field in general (though there's plenty I could be complaining about regarding it), just our society and that white supremacy isn't only KKK hoods and terrorist attacks.

Phrenology, Physiognomy, etc... white supremacy has always been a part of the field (like everything else in the US)
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Prev 1 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 5399 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PiG Daily
21:00
Best Games of SC
Reynor vs Clem
MaxPax vs TBD
SHIN vs TBD
Rogue vs TBD
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 629
PiGStarcraft317
ProTech119
UpATreeSC 87
Railgan 35
SC2Nice 26
StarCraft: Brood War
Mini 143
Shuttle 85
firebathero 72
Killer 30
Sexy 27
JYJ 17
yabsab 12
Dota 2
syndereN140
febbydoto12
League of Legends
C9.Mang0195
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps2452
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu552
Other Games
Grubby5438
tarik_tv3980
FrodaN2303
Beastyqt1080
fl0m383
B2W.Neo347
mouzStarbuck334
ArmadaUGS176
Livibee94
KnowMe57
PPMD34
ZombieGrub33
Organizations
StarCraft 2
angryscii 33
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 208
• davetesta16
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki21
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Other Games
• imaqtpie3240
• WagamamaTV597
• Shiphtur372
• tFFMrPink 22
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
5h 13m
OSC
14h 13m
IPSL
19h 13m
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
20h 13m
OSC
1d 14h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 16h
Replay Cast
2 days
RotterdaM Event
2 days
Patches Events
2 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
4 days
OSC
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

C-Race Season 1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S1: W2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Thunderfire SC2 All-star 2025
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
Underdog Cup #3
NA Kuram Kup
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.