• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:15
CEST 09:15
KST 16:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed9Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll2Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension2Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Who will win EWC 2025? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Starcraft in widescreen BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 500 users

European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread - Page 1299

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1413 Next
Although this thread does not function under the same strict guidelines as the USPMT, it is still a general practice on TL to provide a source with an explanation on why it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Failure to do so will result in a mod action.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 29 2021 15:17 GMT
#25961
So it's only partially freed.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
March 30 2021 20:41 GMT
#25962
On March 29 2021 07:48 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 29 2021 07:39 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
JimmiC I never said "terrorists" only hate western countries. You seem to think I am making some sort of morale judgement since those countries are not what we think of as normally as the targets of what is normally thought of as "terrorists". I am not. It is simply the observation of their actions and their motivations of their actions of rather the lack of it.

You asked which terrorists don't want to annoy those countries. I would take that the lack of action as enough proof, you appear to want something more, whilst not apply that same standard to yourself.

Are you saying there are not terrorist attacks in those countries? Because that is also not true.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_India

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_China

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Egypt

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/prehospital-and-disaster-medicine/article/abs/terrorism-in-japan/0395D08D87A1E7786083428B9B64831B

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Terrorist_incidents_in_South_Korea

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_terrorist_incidents_in_Saudi_Arabia


When did I ever say there are no terrorist attacks on those countries?

Again you seem to be under the impression that I am making some sort of morale judgement and is arguing against something else entirely.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-30 21:20:20
March 30 2021 21:20 GMT
#25963
--- Nuked ---
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-31 21:37:57
March 31 2021 21:33 GMT
#25964
Why don't you quote the entire senetence instead if picking and choosing? You cut the sentences up to change its meaning to the opposite by exclusion. This must be done by conscious decision. You must surely know what you was doing when you cut a sentence in half to change it's intention. Let me do you the favour of the entire sentence.
On March 28 2021 03:29 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
It would be a very foolhardy terrorist organisation that purposefully block the Suez canal. They gain nothing much, and manage to annoy everybody that depends on the Suez Canal. So Egypt, Saudi Arabia, most of Europe, but also countries most "terrorists" wouldn't want to annoy like China, South Korea, Japan, India, who might be looking for a reason to use their recently acquired power projection.
As can be seen, when the sentence and the preceding sentences that make up the context is taken as a whole I have written that blocking the Suez canal would anatgonise a wide range of nation states that would seek action that otherwise not normally directed at. You I presume, is not stupid and so know this, otherwise you wouldn't had cut up the sentence.

You don't actually think I would forget what I wrote and would go "all right then I totally wrote that, and totally didn't write all the preceding other stuff" that would change the intention of a single phrase?

As for the second quote was following your talking about ISIS. Take the example of your wikipedia page on China. None of those are from ISIS but from local China specific terrorism. Terrorists cover disparate groups or individuals who want to achieve specific aims. They don't normally aim to antagonise practically the world that depends on global maritime trade at once.

I thought you was mistaken about motives but since you chop up sentences to change its meaning by exclusion, it seems obvious that you are not lacking in reading comprehension, but rather you are contrary for the sake of being contrary.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
March 31 2021 22:17 GMT
#25965
--- Nuked ---
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-04-01 22:37:48
April 01 2021 22:32 GMT
#25966
You claimed something by mistake, then purposefully quoted by omission to change the meaning of the quote. Expects the person quoted to suddenly not realise what you done. Are you crazy?

I already answered your question about why terrorist wouldn't want to annoy a broad swathe of countries, by telling you that
On March 28 2021 03:43 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
As for why, I think it is self explanatory why terrorist groups don't want military attention being applied to them, unless their explicit aim is for those specific countries to overreact and overreach.
, but apparently, I have done the gross disservice of overestimating your intelligence. It's because military attention tend to disrupt with their plans, usually by identifying and killing them.

You claimed that "China is like one of the countries ISIS hates the most" and " India is also probably top 5on their hit list and so on. ", throw some wikilinks that doesn't actually show that since those listed incidents are not affliated with ISIS and continue to pretend that I somehow said there are no terrorists attacks against those countries instead of
On March 28 2021 03:29 Dangermousecatdog wrote:It would be a very foolhardy terrorist organisation that purposefully block the Suez canal. They gain nothing much, and manage to annoy everybody that depends on the Suez Canal. So Egypt, Saudi Arabia, most of Europe, but also countries most "terrorists" wouldn't want to annoy like China, South Korea, Japan, India, who might be looking for a reason to use their recently acquired power projection.
and that I already written
On March 31 2021 05:41 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Again you seem to be under the impression that I am making some sort of morale judgement and is arguing against something else entirely.
which is acknowledgement that terrorists attacks do occur, but you claim dodging. But I suppose you can claim anything when you misquote by omission to change the meanings of sentences. Then throw a fit when called out on it. Have a good one 🤣
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-04-01 22:50:43
April 01 2021 22:50 GMT
#25967
--- Nuked ---
Kreuger
Profile Joined October 2011
Sweden707 Posts
April 02 2021 17:32 GMT
#25968
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56616778

"Russia has warned Nato against sending any troops to help Ukraine, amid reports of a large Russian military build-up on its borders."

"Ukraine's army commander Gen Ruslan Khomchak says Russia has deployed 28 battalion tactical groups near Ukraine's eastern border and in Crimea, which would amount to 20,000-25,000 troops. Russian officials have not confirmed that, nor given any precise figures.

According to Gen Khomchak, Russia also has nearly 3,000 officers and military instructors in the rebel units in eastern Ukraine."

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-biden/biden-affirms-u-s-unwavering-support-for-ukraine-in-call-statement-idUSKBN2BP14C

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Joe Biden on Friday expressed strong U.S. support for Ukraine in a call with the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the White House said.

“President Biden affirmed the United States’ unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression in the Donbass and Crimea,” the statement said."



Looks like Putin will test the support and what Biden is made of.

Wouldnt expect something to actually happen but allways concerned
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21652 Posts
April 02 2021 19:31 GMT
#25969
On April 03 2021 02:32 Kreuger wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56616778

"Russia has warned Nato against sending any troops to help Ukraine, amid reports of a large Russian military build-up on its borders."

"Ukraine's army commander Gen Ruslan Khomchak says Russia has deployed 28 battalion tactical groups near Ukraine's eastern border and in Crimea, which would amount to 20,000-25,000 troops. Russian officials have not confirmed that, nor given any precise figures.

According to Gen Khomchak, Russia also has nearly 3,000 officers and military instructors in the rebel units in eastern Ukraine."

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-ukraine-biden/biden-affirms-u-s-unwavering-support-for-ukraine-in-call-statement-idUSKBN2BP14C

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Joe Biden on Friday expressed strong U.S. support for Ukraine in a call with the country’s president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, the White House said.

“President Biden affirmed the United States’ unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity in the face of Russia’s ongoing aggression in the Donbass and Crimea,” the statement said."



Looks like Putin will test the support and what Biden is made of.

Wouldnt expect something to actually happen but always concerned
Didn't we all expect nothing to actually happen with Crimea either?
The West has abandoned Ukraine in the recent past once already. If Putin decides he likes to own Ukraine, are we actually going to war to stop him or will we call him a naughty boy again and hope that surely this time he has enough lebensraum.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-04-04 21:11:37
April 04 2021 21:10 GMT
#25970
On April 02 2021 07:50 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 02 2021 07:32 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
You claimed something by mistake, then purposefully quoted by omission to change the meaning of the quote. Expects the person quoted to suddenly not realise what you done. Are you crazy?

I already answered your question about why terrorist wouldn't want to annoy a broad swathe of countries, by telling you that
On March 28 2021 03:43 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
As for why, I think it is self explanatory why terrorist groups don't want military attention being applied to them, unless their explicit aim is for those specific countries to overreact and overreach.
, but apparently, I have done the gross disservice of overestimating your intelligence. It's because military attention tend to disrupt with their plans, usually by identifying and killing them.

You claimed that "China is like one of the countries ISIS hates the most" and " India is also probably top 5on their hit list and so on. ", throw some wikilinks that doesn't actually show that since those listed incidents are not affliated with ISIS and continue to pretend that I somehow said there are no terrorists attacks against those countries instead of
On March 28 2021 03:29 Dangermousecatdog wrote:It would be a very foolhardy terrorist organisation that purposefully block the Suez canal. They gain nothing much, and manage to annoy everybody that depends on the Suez Canal. So Egypt, Saudi Arabia, most of Europe, but also countries most "terrorists" wouldn't want to annoy like China, South Korea, Japan, India, who might be looking for a reason to use their recently acquired power projection.
and that I already written
On March 31 2021 05:41 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
Again you seem to be under the impression that I am making some sort of morale judgement and is arguing against something else entirely.
which is acknowledgement that terrorists attacks do occur, but you claim dodging. But I suppose you can claim anything when you misquote by omission to change the meanings of sentences. Then throw a fit when called out on it. Have a good one 🤣


I am not crazy, I took responsibility for my mistake on ISIS on the next post and again. I know this must be strange for you as you spend pages changing your points so you are not wrong.

I didn't pull that out of the quote because I was hiding it, it had nothing to do with ISIS. I pulled out those quotes because you had just said you never said it, and I was showing that you did. And then showed you all the terrorist attacks that have happened.

The fit is in your imagination, or maybe your projecting I can't be sure, heck I still don't know if you think "terrorists" don't want to upset those countries or not.
Eh, have a good one you said. But continue to post. What a joke.

It's quite simple. I never said China doesn't get terrorist attacks. That's just you who claimed that I did. When I asked where I said that, you went ahead and brazenly cut up a sentence to remove the context so it was the opposite of what I wrote.

That I wrote that terrorists do not aim to create a situation where they are the targets of several and of such a wide range of countries at once for so little gain. And it just so happened I listed some of those countries, and you took China and India out of that and made some rubbish up about that.

You made a mistake with China and ISIS, because you are lazy and pulled out a mass of wikipedia links and hoped I didn't read them, which suggests that you don't have any real interest in the matter. Which raises the question of why you continue this line of reasoning when you clearly don't actually care?

But you cared enough to misquoted and took out the context for the quote in a bid to connect China and terrorism. I have no idea why you would do this. China has terrorist attacks. Same with India. Difference is (ISIS or otherwise) they aren't as a part of an attack to economcially disrupt the global maritime trade.

What interests me is why you are pretending I wrote something, implied or otherwise, that I in fact did not. I don't know why you think I would not realise that you cut up what was written so the meaning was changed. And you continue to insist this. Who are you trying to convince? It certainly can't be me as I already told you I am not fooled.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-04-05 07:09:35
April 05 2021 04:41 GMT
#25971
--- Nuked ---
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-04-05 22:38:39
April 05 2021 22:06 GMT
#25972
Your so called asking a "clarification question" was your making something up. In response to my asking when I ever wrote that, you went and cut out a phrase from the rest of the context that would had given the opposite meaning.

You knew you was dishonestly presenting what I wrote, and I know you dishonestly quoted what I wrote. The mystery is why you think I would not know that you dishonestly quoted what I wrote, as if somehow I would forget what I wrote, despite this being a forum and so what is written is recorded.

Don't know what you expected after you done that, but apparently you seem to believe that if you keep repeating it, I would suddenly turn around and decided I wrote something I did not. Or perhaps it was your intention all along because you don't want to admit that I didn't write that China don't have terrorist attacks.

I don't see this conversation going any further as apparently your aim is to try to persuade that I meant something I did not by excluding the qualifying statements around a phrase, so I wouldn't be replying any further. Insert an expression of farewell.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
April 05 2021 22:55 GMT
#25973
--- Nuked ---
Belisarius
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia6227 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-05-24 11:14:42
May 24 2021 04:34 GMT
#25974
Belarus has used a fighter and a bomb hoax to force down a passenger plane travelling from Greece to Poland Lithuania in order to arrest a journalist who was on the flight.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-57224452
EU leaders are due to discuss their response to what the union's executive called a "hijacking" and the US state department "a shocking act".

Belarus forced the plane, which was bound for Lithuania, to land in Minsk claiming a bomb threat to the aircraft.

It arrested the Belarusian journalist and activist Roman Protasevich.

This is... honestly this is crazy. The flight wasn't even going to Belarus, it was travelling between two European cities via Belarusian airspace, as dozens of flights do every day.

Lukashenko seems to have invented a bomb threat to get the plane to divert to Minsk, and even sent a MiG-29 to make absolutely sure his friendly warning was heeded. As soon as the plane landed they pulled the journalist off and arrested him, then "searched" for the bomb and let the plane go. Absolutely wild.

Polish and Lithuanian government ministers have called it a hijacking, which I think is pretty accurate. The journalist is a dissident who has been critical of Lukashenko's regime and now faces imprisonment, torture and death.

This has huge ramifications imo. Freedom of the air is fundamental. If authoritarian regimes start to believe they can simply snatch their opponents out of the air.... can you imagine if Putin or the CCP started to see this as an option in their airspace?

How should the EU respond when a plane travelling between two of its capitals is forced to land in a third country so a government critic can be arrested? That is the question European leaders must answer when they meet in Brussels.
+ Show Spoiler +

The arrest of Roman Protasevich has provoked a chorus of international outrage but will that be echoed by action? Some leaders - including the Polish prime minister - have already called for fresh sanctions on President Lukashenko's authoritarian government.

Eight foreign affairs committee chairmen from the UK, the US and the EU said flights over and to Belarus should be banned for what they described as an act of piracy.

Some officials even suggested cars and lorries could be stopped from entering the EU from Belarus. Mr Lukashenko has shown how far he is prepared to go to suppress opposition after disputed elections last year. The EU now has to decide what price it is prepared to make him pay.

I've been watching the situation in Belarus with horror for a long time. It's tragic to watch a democracy die day by day on the very border of Europe. Even against that backdrop, this is wild. I would like to see a crushing response tomorrow from the EU and US.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9615 Posts
May 24 2021 06:38 GMT
#25975
Surely the response has to be completely devastating, right?
Like you say, this can't become a thing that leaders do.
RIP Meatloaf <3
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain17976 Posts
May 24 2021 06:42 GMT
#25976
On May 24 2021 15:38 Jockmcplop wrote:
Surely the response has to be completely devastating, right?
Like you say, this can't become a thing that leaders do.

Describe this response. Because the EU already has strict sanctions on the leadership. Sanctions on the country will work no better. What *can* the EU (or NATO for that matter) do?
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9615 Posts
May 24 2021 07:31 GMT
#25977
On May 24 2021 15:42 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 24 2021 15:38 Jockmcplop wrote:
Surely the response has to be completely devastating, right?
Like you say, this can't become a thing that leaders do.

Describe this response. Because the EU already has strict sanctions on the leadership. Sanctions on the country will work no better. What *can* the EU (or NATO for that matter) do?

I dunno, something drastic?
RIP Meatloaf <3
Silvanel
Profile Blog Joined March 2003
Poland4726 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-05-24 08:21:45
May 24 2021 08:21 GMT
#25978
Small correction: the plane was traveling from Athens to Vilinus, so Greece --> Lithuania. Many disidents from Belarus are currently living either in Poland or Lithuania which is a thorn in Lukashenkos back as they continue to influence the population from there.

When it comes to sanctions, the options are limited because Belarus is already heavily sanctioned. I have heard following propositions:
-Block commercial land traffic from Belarus entering EU.
-Ban civilian airplanes from entering airspace over Belarus

I think at this point we are out of options negatively affecting only Lukashenko. We have to hurt ourselves a little if we are to increase pressure.
Pathetic Greta hater.
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands21652 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-05-24 09:38:12
May 24 2021 09:36 GMT
#25979
Yeah the obvious place to start is a complete ban of any airliner that travels to or from an EU city from entering Belarusian airspace.

Sadly the EU is likely to be its usual meek self but this should be a big deal and responded to with as much pressure as the EU can muster.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Belisarius
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia6227 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-05-24 11:36:10
May 24 2021 11:24 GMT
#25980
What would we expect to happen if Lukashenko had straight-up shot the plane down?

They should seriously consider doing whatever that is, imo.
Prev 1 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1413 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 45m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 221
mcanning 94
StarCraft: Brood War
Zeus 1169
yabsab 11
PianO 0
Dota 2
ODPixel454
canceldota88
NeuroSwarm87
League of Legends
JimRising 692
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K893
shoxiejesuss178
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King94
Other Games
summit1g13755
WinterStarcraft314
SortOf69
Trikslyr32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3237
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH387
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2103
League of Legends
• Rush2316
• Lourlo1375
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
2h 45m
WardiTV European League
8h 45m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
16h 45m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
4 days
CSO Contender
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.