• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 14:20
CET 20:20
KST 04:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational10SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)19Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! StarCraft 2 not at the Esports World Cup 2026 Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued Rongyi Cup S3 - RO16 Preview herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Which foreign pros are considered the best? BW General Discussion BW AKA finder tool
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Navigating the Risks and Rew…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2298 users

World Chess Championship 2013 - Page 63

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 61 62 63 64 65 98 Next
Chess discussion continues here
kyllinghest
Profile Joined December 2011
Norway1607 Posts
November 17 2013 15:07 GMT
#1241
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol

I think it analyzes patterns. I went 33-38-29, in the beginning it seemed random, but in the end I got the gist of how to fool it!

Chess-related: Amazing play from Carlsen the last few days!
"NO" -Has
sharkie
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Austria18566 Posts
November 17 2013 15:15 GMT
#1242
On November 18 2013 00:03 KalWarkov wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol


ppl think alike.
there is some certain things that repeat over and over again.
for example, its more likely one will play rock AGAIN after a rock-rock tie, and if it ties again, its even more likely the rock will be played again. theroretically, it should still be 33%, but in this example, humans think "there is no way he is balled enough to play rock 3 times in a row".
In my experience, ppl tend to play something else after the 3rd tie.

again, this is just examples, but there are just certain behaviours that repeat, and the "computer" learned what these tend to be.


You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails
Serek
Profile Joined May 2011
United Kingdom459 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:29:00
November 17 2013 15:28 GMT
#1243
On November 17 2013 04:23 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 02:48 Serek wrote:
On November 17 2013 01:33 kusto wrote:
I have a serious question (no trolling) to all chess people here:
How can you find passion in a game in which a computer is better than a human being? Why does this not prevent you from enjoying this, if it's demystified so easily?

I enjoy team games very much and tried to get into chess but motivation left me because i always knew that the most profitable moves can be calculated via computer. I really wish this was not the case.


So you don't play games or sports because there'll be always someone better than you?

Until chess is solved, and that is still some way off, human players will always be more creative than a computer. That alone is worth watching for.

Like Carlsen, who plays 95% computer moves? The better you are at chess, the more you will play like a computer. That's not a bad thing, since computers don't play boring chess and they don't arrive at the move choice by the same method anyway.

And yet Carlsen won game 6 by not playing the computer-calculated move. It's about being creative when it matters.
Wesso
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands1245 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:31:00
November 17 2013 15:30 GMT
#1244
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 18 2013 00:03 urboss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 22:39 Wesso wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 17 2013 21:54 urboss wrote:
Although engines can be of great help to understand the play of GMs, one needs to be careful not to watch the games purely based on engine evaluation.

In game 6, this is how people with engines may have judged the game:
"The game was drawn until the move 60. Ra4.
If Anand hadn't blundered move 60, the game would have been drawn, what an idiot!"

[image loading]



Can someone explain to me how b4 would become a draw? Me and a friend tried to figure it out but we suck at chess and failed to find it.


[image loading]
The best defense for White is to get the white rook to the 7. or 8. rank to give checks to the Black king from there.

Mind that if the white rook plays back immediately with 60. Ra8, then the Black king doesn't need to protect the pawn on f4 anymore and can step into f2 which eventually wins because the g2 pawn falls.

Anand's idea with 60. Ra4 is to keep the pawn on f4 under attack and to give checks to the king laterally. As was seen in the game, this fails because White's pawns will obstruct the white rook from giving checks.

In the actual game, 62. c4 is not the best defense. Instead the rook should come back to the 8th rank to give checks.
Let's see how Black can win after 60. Ra4 if White uses the best defense:

After 60. Ra4 h3
61. gxh3 Rg6
62. Ra8
[image loading]
The rook comes back to give checks from behind.
62. ... f3
63. Re8+ Kf2
64. b4
[image loading]
Now the black rook will invade and place itself on e1.
64. ... Rg2+
65. Kh1 Rg1+
66. Kh2 Re1
[image loading]
Then the black king can sneak to f1 and the black pawn will promote.
67. Rf8 Ke2
68. Rd8+ Kf1



This is one way how Black can win.
However, what happens if 60. b4 is played instead?

60. b4 h3
61. gxh3 Rg6
62. Rc8
[image loading]
Again, the rook comes back to the last rank to give checks.
The only difference now is that the b pawn is more advanced.

62. ... f3
63. Re8+ Kf2
64. b5
[image loading]
Here, we try again the same operation as before, placing the rook on e1:
Rg2+
65. Kh1 Rg1+
66. Kh2 Re1
In this case, the white rook can take on e1.
67. Rxe1 Kxe1
[image loading]
Both pawns will queen at the same time in the end.

This is just one out of many possible lines.
All the draws are based on the fact that White's b pawn is more advanced and that only checks from the 7th or 8th rank are working.


Thank you very much!
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:52:29
November 17 2013 15:50 GMT
#1245
On November 17 2013 22:31 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 21:31 Grumbels wrote:
On November 17 2013 21:05 GolemMadness wrote:
On November 17 2013 20:39 Grumbels wrote:
Solvability relates to Starcraft about as much as it relates to baseball. Theoretically there is an optimal way to play baseball based on simulating the universe. Except that this is completely nonsensical and irrelevant because many implicit assumptions you have made fail to be met: for instance that optimal play is the best way to play if you want to win. Use this approach for Starcraft and it might discover that one race is "stronger" than another race because it is theoretically always winning, except that this has nothing to do with real strength because humans (and computers too) have limitations and won't play Starcraft as if it's a turn-based game where they can use their database that has infinity more values than all the atoms in the universe. It's also completely irrelevant to building an AI (unlike chess where it is useful) These concepts just can't be used, it's honestly a scientific crime because in science you have to be very rigorous in defining not only concepts but also all the assumptions that need to be met before the concept can be applied to a problem. If you use them haphazardly it leads to ridiculous results like bringing up solvability of Starcraft.

Also, try beating this by playing about a 100 rounds without any outside help:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/science/rock-paper-scissors.html?_r=0


Played 31 rounds, and am up 9-15-7. Wow.

You should try to outsmart it, like with "I played x1..xn last n rounds so now the computer will expect me to play a but I will play b". I don't think you can win. :o

Yes you can, you just have to change your patterns every x rounds (how much rounds you try to consider)
i played 100 rounds and had 45-28-27

unfair, I lost horribly to it

I'm sure that computers are better at rps though. Humans can't be random in the long-term.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
nFo
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada56 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:58:38
November 17 2013 15:58 GMT
#1246

No it's not. You are playing against a human being who thinks and acts in certain patterns. People that are good at RPS have high win rates against a random opponent.
“If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
Crushinator
Profile Joined August 2011
Netherlands2138 Posts
November 17 2013 15:58 GMT
#1247
On November 18 2013 00:15 sharkie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 00:03 KalWarkov wrote:
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol


ppl think alike.
there is some certain things that repeat over and over again.
for example, its more likely one will play rock AGAIN after a rock-rock tie, and if it ties again, its even more likely the rock will be played again. theroretically, it should still be 33%, but in this example, humans think "there is no way he is balled enough to play rock 3 times in a row".
In my experience, ppl tend to play something else after the 3rd tie.

again, this is just examples, but there are just certain behaviours that repeat, and the "computer" learned what these tend to be.


You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails


This is only true if atleast one side is making the decisions purely through random chance, as though generating a random number in your head. However this is not what happens in a rock papers scissors game between humans, we are incapable of generating a random number in our heads. we base our choice atleast partly on the choices made in the past. If the computer in the game that was posted was using a random number generator it would be impossible to beat in the long run. However, the program is written to mimic human decision making, and that means it can be beaten, and it can beat you.
nFo
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada56 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 16:00:04
November 17 2013 15:59 GMT
#1248
On November 18 2013 00:15 sharkie wrote:
You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails


No it isn't. People think in certain patterns and you are playing vs a human opponent. If a robot was throwing one of the 3 randomly with 33.3% chance each and you had to guess which one, then it would be a game of pure chance. Since you are playing vs a thinking human, mind games come into play. Good players can have win rates vs a random opponent.
“If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
Gotard
Profile Joined December 2010
Poland446 Posts
November 17 2013 16:30 GMT
#1249
On November 18 2013 00:07 kyllinghest wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol

I think it analyzes patterns. I went 33-38-29, in the beginning it seemed random, but in the end I got the gist of how to fool it!

Chess-related: Amazing play from Carlsen the last few days!

I've finished with 31-28-41 score using pseudorandom (C++'s 'rand' function).
"who needs girls when u can play as a protoss or riki" Fen1kz 2013
urboss
Profile Joined September 2013
Austria1223 Posts
November 17 2013 16:31 GMT
#1250
Guys, would you mind creating a rock-paper-scissors thread?
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 16:40:52
November 17 2013 16:37 GMT
#1251
By the way, for the record, Magnus Carlsen is also a Grandmaster in rock, paper scissors ,-)

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/413135/april-24-2012/magnus-carlsen
(4 min 08 into the interview)
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
November 17 2013 16:48 GMT
#1252
On November 18 2013 01:31 urboss wrote:
Guys, would you mind creating a rock-paper-scissors thread?

it's rest day
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
sikeTM
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States37 Posts
November 17 2013 17:14 GMT
#1253
On November 18 2013 00:59 nFo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 00:15 sharkie wrote:
You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails


No it isn't. People think in certain patterns and you are playing vs a human opponent. If a robot was throwing one of the 3 randomly with 33.3% chance each and you had to guess which one, then it would be a game of pure chance. Since you are playing vs a thinking human, mind games come into play. Good players can have win rates vs a random opponent.


Oh, really? I always just watched there hands and threw out a second after i saw what they were about to make! Mind games! ;D and if its bo3 i ended it with a volcano. GG no re ;D

On topic: I didnt think Magnus would take TWO wins in this series, especially back to back. Thats huge... hes basically won unless he makes some huge blunders. The post game analysis is easier for me to watch, the VOD is six hours 0_0
mihajovics
Profile Joined April 2011
179 Posts
November 17 2013 19:15 GMT
#1254
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
12006 Posts
November 17 2013 20:29 GMT
#1255
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.


Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
November 17 2013 20:49 GMT
#1256
On November 18 2013 05:29 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.

Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.

A bit of a bold claim. Only three people have held that record over the last 40 years. Even if there's inflation, it's not like people are lining up for it.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
Orome
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
Switzerland11984 Posts
November 17 2013 20:59 GMT
#1257
Yeah that's not really a fair representation. Before Carlsen, noone got remotely close to Kasparov's record, which remains the most ridiculous rating (relative to other players) of all time.
On a purely personal note, I'd like to show Yellow the beauty of infinitely repeating Starcraft 2 bunkers. -Boxer
sharkie
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Austria18566 Posts
November 17 2013 21:05 GMT
#1258
On November 18 2013 05:29 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.


Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.


Carlsen is a very very rare talent.
ch33psh33p
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
7650 Posts
November 17 2013 22:32 GMT
#1259
On November 18 2013 05:29 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.


Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.


...

Are you serious.
secret - never again
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
November 17 2013 22:52 GMT
#1260
I think there is probably more chess talent nowadays. And since Carlsen is somewhat dominant that's very impressive even compared to Kasparov and Fischer.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Prev 1 61 62 63 64 65 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 41m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 256
ProTech140
UpATreeSC 128
MindelVK 45
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2351
Shuttle 491
GuemChi 433
Dewaltoss 202
ggaemo 160
firebathero 111
910 13
HiyA 10
Dota 2
qojqva3585
canceldota19
Counter-Strike
fl0m3478
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox688
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu323
Other Games
gofns6135
Grubby2675
Beastyqt719
ceh9479
allub373
Mlord355
Fuzer 206
ToD168
KnowMe159
DeMusliM129
ArmadaUGS126
mouzStarbuck123
QueenE101
Mew2King73
Livibee50
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 84
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix9
• 80smullet 8
• Pr0nogo 1
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV498
League of Legends
• Jankos2191
• Nemesis1382
• TFBlade1292
Other Games
• imaqtpie1606
• Shiphtur312
Upcoming Events
RongYI Cup
15h 41m
Clem vs ShoWTimE
Zoun vs Bunny
Big Brain Bouts
21h 41m
Percival vs Gerald
Serral vs MaxPax
RongYI Cup
1d 15h
SHIN vs Creator
Classic vs Percival
OSC
1d 17h
BSL 21
1d 19h
RongYI Cup
2 days
Maru vs Cyan
Solar vs Krystianer
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL 21
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
OSC
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-20
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Rongyi Cup S3
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.