• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:31
CEST 06:31
KST 13:31
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature3Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event18Serral wins EWC 202549
Community News
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris18Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new and old maps do you want in the next 1v1 ladder pool? (SC2) : Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Monday Nights Weeklies Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BW AKA finder tool Maps with Neutral Command Centers Victoria gamers
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro24 Group A [ASL20] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The year 2050 European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment"
TL Community
"World Leading Blockchain Asset Retrieval" The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Breaking the Meta: Non-Stand…
TrAiDoS
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3161 users

World Chess Championship 2013 - Page 63

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 61 62 63 64 65 98 Next
Chess discussion continues here
kyllinghest
Profile Joined December 2011
Norway1607 Posts
November 17 2013 15:07 GMT
#1241
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol

I think it analyzes patterns. I went 33-38-29, in the beginning it seemed random, but in the end I got the gist of how to fool it!

Chess-related: Amazing play from Carlsen the last few days!
"NO" -Has
sharkie
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Austria18420 Posts
November 17 2013 15:15 GMT
#1242
On November 18 2013 00:03 KalWarkov wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol


ppl think alike.
there is some certain things that repeat over and over again.
for example, its more likely one will play rock AGAIN after a rock-rock tie, and if it ties again, its even more likely the rock will be played again. theroretically, it should still be 33%, but in this example, humans think "there is no way he is balled enough to play rock 3 times in a row".
In my experience, ppl tend to play something else after the 3rd tie.

again, this is just examples, but there are just certain behaviours that repeat, and the "computer" learned what these tend to be.


You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails
Serek
Profile Joined May 2011
United Kingdom459 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:29:00
November 17 2013 15:28 GMT
#1243
On November 17 2013 04:23 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 02:48 Serek wrote:
On November 17 2013 01:33 kusto wrote:
I have a serious question (no trolling) to all chess people here:
How can you find passion in a game in which a computer is better than a human being? Why does this not prevent you from enjoying this, if it's demystified so easily?

I enjoy team games very much and tried to get into chess but motivation left me because i always knew that the most profitable moves can be calculated via computer. I really wish this was not the case.


So you don't play games or sports because there'll be always someone better than you?

Until chess is solved, and that is still some way off, human players will always be more creative than a computer. That alone is worth watching for.

Like Carlsen, who plays 95% computer moves? The better you are at chess, the more you will play like a computer. That's not a bad thing, since computers don't play boring chess and they don't arrive at the move choice by the same method anyway.

And yet Carlsen won game 6 by not playing the computer-calculated move. It's about being creative when it matters.
Wesso
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands1245 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:31:00
November 17 2013 15:30 GMT
#1244
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 18 2013 00:03 urboss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 22:39 Wesso wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On November 17 2013 21:54 urboss wrote:
Although engines can be of great help to understand the play of GMs, one needs to be careful not to watch the games purely based on engine evaluation.

In game 6, this is how people with engines may have judged the game:
"The game was drawn until the move 60. Ra4.
If Anand hadn't blundered move 60, the game would have been drawn, what an idiot!"

[image loading]



Can someone explain to me how b4 would become a draw? Me and a friend tried to figure it out but we suck at chess and failed to find it.


[image loading]
The best defense for White is to get the white rook to the 7. or 8. rank to give checks to the Black king from there.

Mind that if the white rook plays back immediately with 60. Ra8, then the Black king doesn't need to protect the pawn on f4 anymore and can step into f2 which eventually wins because the g2 pawn falls.

Anand's idea with 60. Ra4 is to keep the pawn on f4 under attack and to give checks to the king laterally. As was seen in the game, this fails because White's pawns will obstruct the white rook from giving checks.

In the actual game, 62. c4 is not the best defense. Instead the rook should come back to the 8th rank to give checks.
Let's see how Black can win after 60. Ra4 if White uses the best defense:

After 60. Ra4 h3
61. gxh3 Rg6
62. Ra8
[image loading]
The rook comes back to give checks from behind.
62. ... f3
63. Re8+ Kf2
64. b4
[image loading]
Now the black rook will invade and place itself on e1.
64. ... Rg2+
65. Kh1 Rg1+
66. Kh2 Re1
[image loading]
Then the black king can sneak to f1 and the black pawn will promote.
67. Rf8 Ke2
68. Rd8+ Kf1



This is one way how Black can win.
However, what happens if 60. b4 is played instead?

60. b4 h3
61. gxh3 Rg6
62. Rc8
[image loading]
Again, the rook comes back to the last rank to give checks.
The only difference now is that the b pawn is more advanced.

62. ... f3
63. Re8+ Kf2
64. b5
[image loading]
Here, we try again the same operation as before, placing the rook on e1:
Rg2+
65. Kh1 Rg1+
66. Kh2 Re1
In this case, the white rook can take on e1.
67. Rxe1 Kxe1
[image loading]
Both pawns will queen at the same time in the end.

This is just one out of many possible lines.
All the draws are based on the fact that White's b pawn is more advanced and that only checks from the 7th or 8th rank are working.


Thank you very much!
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:52:29
November 17 2013 15:50 GMT
#1245
On November 17 2013 22:31 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 21:31 Grumbels wrote:
On November 17 2013 21:05 GolemMadness wrote:
On November 17 2013 20:39 Grumbels wrote:
Solvability relates to Starcraft about as much as it relates to baseball. Theoretically there is an optimal way to play baseball based on simulating the universe. Except that this is completely nonsensical and irrelevant because many implicit assumptions you have made fail to be met: for instance that optimal play is the best way to play if you want to win. Use this approach for Starcraft and it might discover that one race is "stronger" than another race because it is theoretically always winning, except that this has nothing to do with real strength because humans (and computers too) have limitations and won't play Starcraft as if it's a turn-based game where they can use their database that has infinity more values than all the atoms in the universe. It's also completely irrelevant to building an AI (unlike chess where it is useful) These concepts just can't be used, it's honestly a scientific crime because in science you have to be very rigorous in defining not only concepts but also all the assumptions that need to be met before the concept can be applied to a problem. If you use them haphazardly it leads to ridiculous results like bringing up solvability of Starcraft.

Also, try beating this by playing about a 100 rounds without any outside help:
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/science/rock-paper-scissors.html?_r=0


Played 31 rounds, and am up 9-15-7. Wow.

You should try to outsmart it, like with "I played x1..xn last n rounds so now the computer will expect me to play a but I will play b". I don't think you can win. :o

Yes you can, you just have to change your patterns every x rounds (how much rounds you try to consider)
i played 100 rounds and had 45-28-27

unfair, I lost horribly to it

I'm sure that computers are better at rps though. Humans can't be random in the long-term.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
nFo
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada56 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 15:58:38
November 17 2013 15:58 GMT
#1246

No it's not. You are playing against a human being who thinks and acts in certain patterns. People that are good at RPS have high win rates against a random opponent.
“If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
Crushinator
Profile Joined August 2011
Netherlands2138 Posts
November 17 2013 15:58 GMT
#1247
On November 18 2013 00:15 sharkie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 00:03 KalWarkov wrote:
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol


ppl think alike.
there is some certain things that repeat over and over again.
for example, its more likely one will play rock AGAIN after a rock-rock tie, and if it ties again, its even more likely the rock will be played again. theroretically, it should still be 33%, but in this example, humans think "there is no way he is balled enough to play rock 3 times in a row".
In my experience, ppl tend to play something else after the 3rd tie.

again, this is just examples, but there are just certain behaviours that repeat, and the "computer" learned what these tend to be.


You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails


This is only true if atleast one side is making the decisions purely through random chance, as though generating a random number in your head. However this is not what happens in a rock papers scissors game between humans, we are incapable of generating a random number in our heads. we base our choice atleast partly on the choices made in the past. If the computer in the game that was posted was using a random number generator it would be impossible to beat in the long run. However, the program is written to mimic human decision making, and that means it can be beaten, and it can beat you.
nFo
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada56 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 16:00:04
November 17 2013 15:59 GMT
#1248
On November 18 2013 00:15 sharkie wrote:
You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails


No it isn't. People think in certain patterns and you are playing vs a human opponent. If a robot was throwing one of the 3 randomly with 33.3% chance each and you had to guess which one, then it would be a game of pure chance. Since you are playing vs a thinking human, mind games come into play. Good players can have win rates vs a random opponent.
“If you're not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
Gotard
Profile Joined December 2010
Poland446 Posts
November 17 2013 16:30 GMT
#1249
On November 18 2013 00:07 kyllinghest wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2013 23:22 sharkie wrote:
rock paper scissors has nothing logical behind it, what is the use of that "computer"? lol

I think it analyzes patterns. I went 33-38-29, in the beginning it seemed random, but in the end I got the gist of how to fool it!

Chess-related: Amazing play from Carlsen the last few days!

I've finished with 31-28-41 score using pseudorandom (C++'s 'rand' function).
"who needs girls when u can play as a protoss or riki" Fen1kz 2013
urboss
Profile Joined September 2013
Austria1223 Posts
November 17 2013 16:31 GMT
#1250
Guys, would you mind creating a rock-paper-scissors thread?
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-11-17 16:40:52
November 17 2013 16:37 GMT
#1251
By the way, for the record, Magnus Carlsen is also a Grandmaster in rock, paper scissors ,-)

http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/413135/april-24-2012/magnus-carlsen
(4 min 08 into the interview)
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
November 17 2013 16:48 GMT
#1252
On November 18 2013 01:31 urboss wrote:
Guys, would you mind creating a rock-paper-scissors thread?

it's rest day
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
sikeTM
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United States37 Posts
November 17 2013 17:14 GMT
#1253
On November 18 2013 00:59 nFo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 00:15 sharkie wrote:
You actually think during rock paper scissors? Who does that o.O
It's a game decided purely by chance lol.

Like Head or Tails


No it isn't. People think in certain patterns and you are playing vs a human opponent. If a robot was throwing one of the 3 randomly with 33.3% chance each and you had to guess which one, then it would be a game of pure chance. Since you are playing vs a thinking human, mind games come into play. Good players can have win rates vs a random opponent.


Oh, really? I always just watched there hands and threw out a second after i saw what they were about to make! Mind games! ;D and if its bo3 i ended it with a volcano. GG no re ;D

On topic: I didnt think Magnus would take TWO wins in this series, especially back to back. Thats huge... hes basically won unless he makes some huge blunders. The post game analysis is easier for me to watch, the VOD is six hours 0_0
mihajovics
Profile Joined April 2011
179 Posts
November 17 2013 19:15 GMT
#1254
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11857 Posts
November 17 2013 20:29 GMT
#1255
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.


Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
November 17 2013 20:49 GMT
#1256
On November 18 2013 05:29 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.

Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.

A bit of a bold claim. Only three people have held that record over the last 40 years. Even if there's inflation, it's not like people are lining up for it.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
Orome
Profile Blog Joined June 2004
Switzerland11984 Posts
November 17 2013 20:59 GMT
#1257
Yeah that's not really a fair representation. Before Carlsen, noone got remotely close to Kasparov's record, which remains the most ridiculous rating (relative to other players) of all time.
On a purely personal note, I'd like to show Yellow the beauty of infinitely repeating Starcraft 2 bunkers. -Boxer
sharkie
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Austria18420 Posts
November 17 2013 21:05 GMT
#1258
On November 18 2013 05:29 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.


Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.


Carlsen is a very very rare talent.
ch33psh33p
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
7650 Posts
November 17 2013 22:32 GMT
#1259
On November 18 2013 05:29 Yurie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2013 04:15 mihajovics wrote:
so the only question remains...
how many decades of Carlsen domination will we see? He already broke Kasparov's record of highest rating, now it's time to break his record of being #1 on the rating list.


Every single generation breaks the rating record. There is inflation in the system.


...

Are you serious.
secret - never again
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
November 17 2013 22:52 GMT
#1260
I think there is probably more chess talent nowadays. And since Carlsen is somewhat dominant that's very impressive even compared to Kasparov and Fischer.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Prev 1 61 62 63 64 65 98 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Korean StarCraft League
03:00
Week 79
CranKy Ducklings121
davetesta41
HKG_Chickenman32
IntoTheiNu 28
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 272
RuFF_SC2 161
StarCraft: Brood War
ggaemo 979
Sea 244
Leta 206
Sexy 97
Dota 2
monkeys_forever915
NeuroSwarm107
LuMiX0
League of Legends
JimRising 652
Counter-Strike
C9.Mang0385
Stewie2K338
Super Smash Bros
amsayoshi51
Other Games
summit1g7668
shahzam729
ViBE235
singsing66
Trikslyr36
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick894
BasetradeTV33
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH81
• Sammyuel 17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo733
• Stunt278
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 29m
SC Evo League
7h 29m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
8h 29m
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
CSO Cup
11h 29m
[BSL 2025] Weekly
13h 29m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 5h
SC Evo League
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Queen vs HyuN
EffOrt vs Calm
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
RotterdaM Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs TBD
Jaedong vs Mong
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
herO vs TBD
Royal vs Barracks
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Cosmonarchy
6 days
OyAji vs Sziky
Sziky vs WolFix
WolFix vs OyAji
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
BSL Team Wars
6 days
Team Hawk vs Team Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Jiahua Invitational
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
Acropolis #4 - TS1
CSLAN 3
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
Sisters' Call Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.