UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 190
Forum Index > General Forum |
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note. Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon. All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting. https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk | ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
| ||
farvacola
United States18832 Posts
On July 03 2016 23:59 WhiteDog wrote: The government is not at the source of the problem tho, it's only a solution to a problem. The source is the fact that the housing market does not regulate well by itself, and the question in regards to migrants is the similar. A housing market with no government action will lead to bad situations with spatial segregation (both ethnical and from an income standpoint). I agree wholeheartedly with this perspective. | ||
Lonyo
United Kingdom3884 Posts
On July 03 2016 22:35 Shield wrote: Do most immigrants from outside EU do jobs which don't require higher education? I heard an opinion yesterday that people want to leave EU because Europeans are well educated, are willing to work for less and, therefore, "steal" their jobs. On the other hand, they're (people who want to Leave) not afraid of immigration outside EU because they work what the British people don't want to do. True/false? I don't know the whole picture to have an idea, but I see quite a lot of Middle Eastern people who have halal/kebab shops, bus drivers, etc. Edit: I just remembered that the media often mentions Polish plumbers so that's a counter-argument. https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/10/uk-plumbers-builders-engineers-skill-crisis-economy http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35667939 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/11/brexit-shortage-construction-staff-barratt-housebuilding-uk-eu-referendum The problem is that people see foreign doctors, or plumbers, or anything, and think that they are taking away jobs. They are quite often filling skills gaps. I wonder how much the build rate will decrease when we have even fewer skilled builders because we don't have access to the EU labour pool. Hospitals are going to Indian and the Philippines to try and recruit to cover staff shortages already, pre-referendum. Thomas estimates 30-40% of Barratt’s workforce in the capital hails from mainland Europe. “It wouldn’t be unusual to find 10-plus nationalities on a London construction site, and dual language signs,” he said. | ||
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On July 03 2016 23:49 Jockmcplop wrote: Its hard to see how the effect of migrants could be anywhere near the level of the effect of successive governments failing to ensure that there is enough new housing. British governments have been failing at this for decades, this was a predictable housing crisis, not caused by migrants at all. The most frustrating thing is that our current government seems to have no interest in trying to solve the problem by building new houses. Yeah I know, it's crazy. It's as if the government wanted to scapegoat the most disenfranchised members of the community to excuse them from their mistakes. Edit: On July 04 2016 00:30 Lonyo wrote: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/feb/10/uk-plumbers-builders-engineers-skill-crisis-economy http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-35667939 https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/may/11/brexit-shortage-construction-staff-barratt-housebuilding-uk-eu-referendum The problem is that people see foreign doctors, or plumbers, or anything, and think that they are taking away jobs. They are quite often filling skills gaps. I wonder how much the build rate will decrease when we have even fewer skilled builders because we don't have access to the EU labour pool. Hospitals are going to Indian and the Philippines to try and recruit to cover staff shortages already, pre-referendum. Yep, and that's why the house-builders tanked the hardest on 'New Black Friday'. | ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On July 03 2016 23:49 Jockmcplop wrote: Its hard to see how the effect of migrants could be anywhere near the level of the effect of successive governments failing to ensure that there is enough new housing. British governments have been failing at this for decades, this was a predictable housing crisis, not caused by migrants at all. The most frustrating thing is that our current government seems to have no interest in trying to solve the problem by building new houses. I doubt the UK is socialist enough to be responsible for housing? It should be up to private businesses to build houses, then sell them. I could be wrong about the UK, but that's how it should be in a non-socialist state. Why don't private businesses build more houses? I don't know, but it's a good question. | ||
puerk
Germany855 Posts
you can not add more prime location downtown london real estate to the market so every building project outside of prime locations is increadibly risky: either people come and the project flurishes or they don't and all interdependent factors like infrastructure, shops, services do not come aswell. no single company level actor can offer the needed security and backing that a real estate development will be profitable, as it is always about: will all factors align that people want to live and work there and a third problem in my mind is that rent level is thought to be correlated with the value development of the property itself: building low rent housing has the added risk of deteriorating faster in the eyes of the real estate developers... to me there seems to be a vibe that affordable housing goes down the drain faster (from my experience this is mostly due to neglect by the owners and not the renters but both happen) so why would you invest in land (price only determined by location) and then build something cheap with low return on investment and an unfavourable degradation curve, when you can instead build something more expensive with higher return on investment and a development curve that might even slope upward, because even though the real estate gets worn and used the high rent clientel increases the value of the neighbourhood and attracts more of them, so it becomes an object of speculation and the price inflates the absolute land price no matter what you want to build on it will always swing the balance to high return on investment decisions | ||
Deleuze
United Kingdom2102 Posts
On July 04 2016 01:19 puerk wrote: land is finite and i really like the german word for real estate in that context: it is immobile, so the fundamental will always be location you can not add more prime location downtown london real estate to the market so every building project outside of prime locations is increadibly risky: either people come and the project flurishes or they don't and all interdependent factors like infrastructure, shops, services do not come aswell. no single company level actor can offer the needed security and backing that a real estate development will be profitable, as it is always about: will all factors align that people want to live and work there and a third problem in my mind is that rent level is thought to be correlated with the value development of the property itself: building low rent housing has the added risk of deteriorating faster in the eyes of the real estate developers... to me there seems to be a vibe that affordable housing goes down the drain faster (from my experience this is mostly due to neglect by the owners and not the renters but both happen) so why would you invest in land (price only determined by location) and then build something cheap with low return on investment and an unfavourable degradation curve, when you can instead build something more expensive with higher return on investment and a development curve that might even slope upward, because even though the real estate gets worn and used the high rent clientel increases the value of the neighbourhood and attracts more of them, so it becomes an object of speculation and the price inflates the absolute land price no matter what you want to build on it will always swing the balance to high return on investment decisions I don't think you could say it any better. | ||
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
http://www.demographia.com/dhi.pdf I tend to agree with their findings. a highlight: "It is undeniable that demand factors played a role in stimulating the housing market and those factors were, for the most part, in the hands of national governments. However, the real culprit, the real source of the problem, was the refusal of local and state governments and their land management agencies to provide an adequate and affordable supply of land for new housing stock to meet demand." | ||
puerk
Germany855 Posts
selling more land will not change what real estate gets developed on it, affordable housing is not the best investment to make according to the reasoning i laid out earlier, so the government has to step in i think it should tackle the problem from 2 sides: - build, supply and maintain infrastructure, of transportation, leisure and services - regulate the market via a rent cap, applied to a fraction of every development. if you can build expensive housing you can certainly provide cheap as well. i.e. if you want to build a billionaires investment ghost town, fine as long as x% of total appartments/units are offered at the local social housing rate (not every city in every country will have such a rate predetermined already but for instance in my city in germany its 300€ a month for a single adult including heating and mandatory house services, so you could work that out aswell) furthermore i would like a containment of sprawl, as deteriorating city centers <-> moving to suburbs is a vicious cycle wrecking not only economies but also the lifes of the least mobile residents... strengthen current places of residence instead of replacing them for the afluent, mobile and well informed, and leaving everyone else behind | ||
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
The five Conservative leadership candidates have all said they would not hold a referendum on Britain's exit deal from the EU. Work and pensions secretary Stephen Crabb, who campaigned for Remain, said the referendum was a "clear instruction to government" and there could be "no attempt to sidestep it". Justice Secretary Michael Gove has said he would wait until at least 2017 to kick off the two-year process of negotiating the UK's withdrawal by invoking Article 50 of the Lisbon Treaty. Home Secretary Theresa May, who is seen as the frontrunner, has said the government should not invoke Article 50 before the end of the year. But energy minister Andrea Leadsom says it should be triggered as quickly as possible, to remove economic uncertainty. BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36698055 | ||
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
| ||
Laurens
Belgium4544 Posts
| ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21767 Posts
Feels like there has to be more behind this, you don't just quit and walk away so soon after winning a major victory you have been fighting for your entire career. | ||
Dan HH
Romania9128 Posts
| ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4338 Posts
The fact is that these jobs can no longer afford a basic standard of living - that is a house (even in a shitty area), food, electricity.The main cost here is housing which has been in a huge bubble and has increased far beyond reason. Eastern Europeans stay for a few years and send whatever they can home, it is incredibly hard to raise a nuclear family in England on the wages for low paid workers with the housing situation being what it has been the past decade.Natives can get housing benefit and the rest and live better than if they were working f/t at a low wage job.That is not right and is totally unsustainable. This guy puts it across well | ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21767 Posts
On July 04 2016 20:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: This argument that local people don't want to do low paying work like cleaning, labouring etc is only a half truth. The fact is that these jobs can no longer afford a basic standard of living - that is a house (even in a shitty area), food, electricity.The main cost here is housing which has been in a huge bubble and has increased far beyond reason. Eastern Europeans stay for a few years and send whatever they can home, it is incredibly hard to raise a nuclear family in England on the wages for low paid workers with the housing situation being what it has been the past decade.Natives can get housing benefit and the rest and live better than if they were working f/t at a low wage job.That is not right and is totally unsustainable. And how exactly will leaving the EU fix the housing market and minimum wage. | ||
Laurens
Belgium4544 Posts
On July 04 2016 20:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: This argument that local people don't want to do low paying work like cleaning, labouring etc is only a half truth. The fact is that these jobs can no longer afford a basic standard of living - that is a house (even in a shitty area), food, electricity.The main cost here is housing which has been in a huge bubble and has increased far beyond reason. Eastern Europeans stay for a few years and send whatever they can home, it is incredibly hard to raise a nuclear family in England on the wages for low paid workers with the housing situation being what it has been the past decade.Natives can get housing benefit and the rest and live better than if they were working f/t at a low wage job.That is not right and is totally unsustainable. This guy puts it across well https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gHLfMXb0Yg Did you watch the vid though? All I see is the guy getting owned at the end by the tiny lady. Not once does he explain how the Brexit would help any of his issues lmao. As he rightly states, Britain has been multicultural for decades, EU or not, the Polish will still be there. | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4338 Posts
On July 04 2016 18:57 Gorsameth wrote: That timing to quit. I dont... Feels like there has to be more behind this, you don't just quit and walk away so soon after winning a major victory you have been fighting for your entire career. Look at the sort of people he's had to put up with.Absolute scum.I salute the guy for lasting as long as he has. ![]() | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4338 Posts
On July 04 2016 20:44 Laurens wrote: Did you watch the vid though? All I see is the guy getting owned at the end by the tiny lady. Not once does he explain how the Brexit would help any of his issues lmao. As he rightly states, Britain has been multicultural for decades, EU or not, the Polish will still be there. Wow. If you think zero hours contracts helps your argument then there is no help for you. Even back in 2007 i doubt we'd see Northern Rock lending to someone employed on a zero hours contract, what is your thoughts? 150,000 mortgage on a zero hours contract anyone? Hah! | ||
Laurens
Belgium4544 Posts
On July 04 2016 20:47 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Wow. If you think zero hours contracts helps your argument then there is no help for you. Even back in 2007 i doubt we'd see Northern Rock lending to someone employed on a zero hours contract, what is your thoughts? 150,000 mortgage on a zero hours contract anyone? Hah! Ignore that bit of the sentence and listen to the rest. "This country has not protected their workers at all since the 80s, not once, and it is only because of Europe that we have any kind of protection." Guy's response: "Fair enough, but the bottom line is, we can not have a situation where the British come second, Britain can not be controlled by Belgium!" All I can say to that is LMAO. The guy is just spouting random stuff without any fact or reason to it. e: Don't forget to answer to Gorsameth. How does the Brexit even fix any of the problems you talk about. | ||
| ||