• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:04
CEST 01:04
KST 08:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes45BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
ASL20 General Discussion Soulkey on ASL S20 BW General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group C [ASL20] Ro16 Group D Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1670 users

What's Wrong with Multiculturalism? - Page 18

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next All
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
August 13 2012 00:29 GMT
#341
On August 13 2012 09:27 Elsid wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2012 09:22 Slakter wrote:
On August 13 2012 09:13 sam!zdat wrote:
You'd be surprised at how little Marx has to do with soviet communism

(soviet communism is only a german import in the way that american liberalism is a french import)

Off topic but this is wrong, early marxist communism does not have a lot to do with Soviet communism (weird word since soviet communism also changed a lot over time) but Marx himself, after traveling through Soviet thought that this was a better alternative.

I'm not saying that this makes either Soviet communism, (marx-leninism I assume?) Marxism or any other sort of communism more "wrong". I'm just saying that you have to at least be historically correct. I call myself an anarchocommunist but I can still admit that Marx wasn't perfect.


Marx died in like 1884 did he not and the russian revolution was in 1917, how could he have possibly travelled through the soviet union? :o


Well I always thought he was ahead of his time...
shikata ga nai
lOvOlUNiMEDiA
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States643 Posts
August 13 2012 00:30 GMT
#342
On August 13 2012 09:29 sam!zdat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2012 09:27 Elsid wrote:
On August 13 2012 09:22 Slakter wrote:
On August 13 2012 09:13 sam!zdat wrote:
You'd be surprised at how little Marx has to do with soviet communism

(soviet communism is only a german import in the way that american liberalism is a french import)

Off topic but this is wrong, early marxist communism does not have a lot to do with Soviet communism (weird word since soviet communism also changed a lot over time) but Marx himself, after traveling through Soviet thought that this was a better alternative.

I'm not saying that this makes either Soviet communism, (marx-leninism I assume?) Marxism or any other sort of communism more "wrong". I'm just saying that you have to at least be historically correct. I call myself an anarchocommunist but I can still admit that Marx wasn't perfect.


Marx died in like 1884 did he not and the russian revolution was in 1917, how could he have possibly travelled through the soviet union? :o


Well I always thought he was ahead of his time...


haha!
To say that I'm missing the point, you would first have to show that such work can have a point.
jodogohoo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada2533 Posts
August 13 2012 04:28 GMT
#343
On August 13 2012 09:29 sam!zdat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2012 09:27 Elsid wrote:
On August 13 2012 09:22 Slakter wrote:
On August 13 2012 09:13 sam!zdat wrote:
You'd be surprised at how little Marx has to do with soviet communism

(soviet communism is only a german import in the way that american liberalism is a french import)

Off topic but this is wrong, early marxist communism does not have a lot to do with Soviet communism (weird word since soviet communism also changed a lot over time) but Marx himself, after traveling through Soviet thought that this was a better alternative.

I'm not saying that this makes either Soviet communism, (marx-leninism I assume?) Marxism or any other sort of communism more "wrong". I'm just saying that you have to at least be historically correct. I call myself an anarchocommunist but I can still admit that Marx wasn't perfect.


Marx died in like 1884 did he not and the russian revolution was in 1917, how could he have possibly travelled through the soviet union? :o


Well I always thought he was ahead of his time...

godlike ;D
jodogohoo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-13 06:37:59
August 13 2012 06:37 GMT
#344
On August 11 2012 23:31 reincremate wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2012 23:22 zalz wrote:
On August 11 2012 23:09 reincremate wrote:
On August 11 2012 15:42 zalz wrote:
Multiculturalism doesn't work. You need some form of cohession, some larger culture that everyone somehow feels a part of.

If not that, it is simply cultural segregation, something which is already a fact in many places in Europe.


Not all cultures are equal.

It works pretty well in Canada (contrary to what white nationalists argue). Here's some stuff explaining why:
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/multi-state.pdf
http://post.queensu.ca/~bantingk/Canadian_Multiculturalism.pdf

How well people of different groups function relative to other groups is dependent on the social and economic conditions such as ability to find jobs rather than some groups of people just having better belief and value systems that others. Religious and political extremism emerge from tangible problems like not being able to make ends meet while living in a hostile environment. Even in a country like Canada (or any other country with a large immigrant population) where recognition of foreign credentials is an issue (let immigrants in based on credentials, don't give immigrants jobs they're qualified for), muliticulturalism has not been an problem and policies favouring multiculturalism have proven to work.


Canada isn't Europe.

Your position on the world actually influences the kind of refugees you are likely to pick up.

Canada is impossible to reach for economical refugees. Meanwhile, every rich family that doesn't like the political waves in their respective country can book a ticket to Canada or America, depending on their preference.

The economical refugees come for the money, the political refugees come for the culture.

Virutally all immigrants, illegal immigrants and arguably most refugees comes for the money. Immigrants vastly outnumber the other two groups. It's just that the money is more accessible here because we have a system that creates more opportunities. People don't just go "I hate this country, I'm going to Canada". I've never met an immigrant who did not have national/ethnic/religious pride or identity that they brought from their home country with them, but of course that's just anecdotal evidence. But if you read the links or other studies about the sociology of Canada, you'll find that people here identify both as Canadians and as whatever else they want to identify with. For the most part it's simply the fact that Canada is just less xenophobic and has a higher demand for skilled labour.


actually. canada is a bad place for refugees. do not come to canada if you are a refugee ;( this talk/lecture i went to also had refugees / people who were refugees come to the talk and then talk about their experiences and yeah... canada... not so good after all T_T;;

source: http://www.sfu.ca/tlcvan/clients/sfu_woodwards/2012-05-30_Woodwards_Right_to_Refuge_9316/
Stratos_speAr
Profile Joined May 2009
United States6959 Posts
August 13 2012 06:47 GMT
#345
On August 13 2012 15:37 jodogohoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2012 23:31 reincremate wrote:
On August 11 2012 23:22 zalz wrote:
On August 11 2012 23:09 reincremate wrote:
On August 11 2012 15:42 zalz wrote:
Multiculturalism doesn't work. You need some form of cohession, some larger culture that everyone somehow feels a part of.

If not that, it is simply cultural segregation, something which is already a fact in many places in Europe.


Not all cultures are equal.

It works pretty well in Canada (contrary to what white nationalists argue). Here's some stuff explaining why:
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/multi-state.pdf
http://post.queensu.ca/~bantingk/Canadian_Multiculturalism.pdf

How well people of different groups function relative to other groups is dependent on the social and economic conditions such as ability to find jobs rather than some groups of people just having better belief and value systems that others. Religious and political extremism emerge from tangible problems like not being able to make ends meet while living in a hostile environment. Even in a country like Canada (or any other country with a large immigrant population) where recognition of foreign credentials is an issue (let immigrants in based on credentials, don't give immigrants jobs they're qualified for), muliticulturalism has not been an problem and policies favouring multiculturalism have proven to work.


Canada isn't Europe.

Your position on the world actually influences the kind of refugees you are likely to pick up.

Canada is impossible to reach for economical refugees. Meanwhile, every rich family that doesn't like the political waves in their respective country can book a ticket to Canada or America, depending on their preference.

The economical refugees come for the money, the political refugees come for the culture.

Virutally all immigrants, illegal immigrants and arguably most refugees comes for the money. Immigrants vastly outnumber the other two groups. It's just that the money is more accessible here because we have a system that creates more opportunities. People don't just go "I hate this country, I'm going to Canada". I've never met an immigrant who did not have national/ethnic/religious pride or identity that they brought from their home country with them, but of course that's just anecdotal evidence. But if you read the links or other studies about the sociology of Canada, you'll find that people here identify both as Canadians and as whatever else they want to identify with. For the most part it's simply the fact that Canada is just less xenophobic and has a higher demand for skilled labour.


actually. canada is a bad place for refugees. do not come to canada if you are a refugee ;( this talk/lecture i went to also had refugees / people who were refugees come to the talk and then talk about their experiences and yeah... canada... not so good after all T_T;;

source: http://www.sfu.ca/tlcvan/clients/sfu_woodwards/2012-05-30_Woodwards_Right_to_Refuge_9316/


So I can't run away to Canada once the crazy conservatives take over America?

Sad...
A sound mind in a sound body, is a short, but full description of a happy state in this World: he that has these two, has little more to wish for; and he that wants either of them, will be little the better for anything else.
InDaHouse
Profile Joined May 2008
Sweden956 Posts
August 13 2012 16:22 GMT
#346
The Bible and the Quran are not the same.

The Bible is divinely inspired, the Quran is the literal word of god.

Christians derive the validity of their faith from the miracles performed by Jesus. Muslims literally believe that their religion's miracle is the Quran, a book they believe is not only flawless, but contains hidden wisdom and revelations in science and the future.


You may consider it a small difference, but the results are massive.

Anyone who doubts the Quran is simply not a muslim, because he goes against the literal word of god. Meanwhile, Christians can claim the Bible is divine, but they also acknowledge that it can contain errors.

The result is that Christians are permitted to doubt and discard more or less anything they want. Who is to say what is divine and what is a translation error?

Meanwhile, muslims are expected to accept everything, because the entire book is the word of god and god is without flaw.


This however has not kept the Muslim faith singular in outlook.

The truth that not many people realize, is that the Quran is actually not that important in Islam. Now when I say this, I don't mean that it isn't the most divine text in their faith, because it is, but in terms of practical use, it doesn't do much.

The Hadiths, collections of the life of the prophet, are far more important for day-to-day muslim life. The Quran mostly serves as the divine foundation, whilst the Hadiths are the house build upon the foundation.

The problem with that is that every reading of Islam is considered, by the respective sect, the absolute and unalterable truth, because they all derive their legitimacy from a text that they belief has no flaw.


So no, the Quran and the Bible should not be considered similar, even though the Quran is largely a plagiarism from the new testament, just as the new testament is a plagiarism of the old testament.

(For the record, the Quran is anything but flawless, but it isn't a debate you should ever even try to have because the texts can be twisted to such a degree that even the parts that support a geo-centric universe are eventually considered "correct in a way.")

Good post, many people seem to forget that the Quran is the literal word of God which the Bible is NOT. Can you doubt the words of God?
Stork protoss legend
Euronyme
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden3804 Posts
August 14 2012 00:28 GMT
#347
On August 14 2012 01:22 InDaHouse wrote:
Show nested quote +
The Bible and the Quran are not the same.

The Bible is divinely inspired, the Quran is the literal word of god.

Christians derive the validity of their faith from the miracles performed by Jesus. Muslims literally believe that their religion's miracle is the Quran, a book they believe is not only flawless, but contains hidden wisdom and revelations in science and the future.


You may consider it a small difference, but the results are massive.

Anyone who doubts the Quran is simply not a muslim, because he goes against the literal word of god. Meanwhile, Christians can claim the Bible is divine, but they also acknowledge that it can contain errors.

The result is that Christians are permitted to doubt and discard more or less anything they want. Who is to say what is divine and what is a translation error?

Meanwhile, muslims are expected to accept everything, because the entire book is the word of god and god is without flaw.


This however has not kept the Muslim faith singular in outlook.

The truth that not many people realize, is that the Quran is actually not that important in Islam. Now when I say this, I don't mean that it isn't the most divine text in their faith, because it is, but in terms of practical use, it doesn't do much.

The Hadiths, collections of the life of the prophet, are far more important for day-to-day muslim life. The Quran mostly serves as the divine foundation, whilst the Hadiths are the house build upon the foundation.

The problem with that is that every reading of Islam is considered, by the respective sect, the absolute and unalterable truth, because they all derive their legitimacy from a text that they belief has no flaw.


So no, the Quran and the Bible should not be considered similar, even though the Quran is largely a plagiarism from the new testament, just as the new testament is a plagiarism of the old testament.

(For the record, the Quran is anything but flawless, but it isn't a debate you should ever even try to have because the texts can be twisted to such a degree that even the parts that support a geo-centric universe are eventually considered "correct in a way.")

Good post, many people seem to forget that the Quran is the literal word of God which the Bible is NOT. Can you doubt the words of God?


Well you can still read it differently. I recall reading in school that for instance a sentence such as "thieves right hand should be cut off" could be read as "we must teach criminals what's right, and thus separating the thief from the man" and such.

Essentially the bible and the Quran are treated the same. The difference is that a lot of Arab countries are more hard core in their religion than the west currently is. It's kind of like going back in time a couple of hundred years, or perhaps visiting one of those christian fundamentalists in southern USA-
The bible could be questioned at the same point in time when the religion itself could be questioned. I don't think that the Spanish inquisition for instance would've given two fucks about you thinking that the translation was off if you would've gone around talking about the bible being wrong somewhere.

Afaik it's also fairly common to just be atheist. I've heard that a huge part of Iran's population are atheists for instance. I don't have any facts to back that up, it's just something that I've heard mentioned a lot.
I think a fitting analogy would be for a relatively liberal country to have the pope as their leader.
I bet i can maı̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̨̨̨̨̨̨ke you wipe your screen.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 00:35:38
August 14 2012 00:35 GMT
#348
I don't know about Iran, but I know that in Iraq it is not common to be an atheist. I was working with a guy who had been an outspoken atheist in Iraq, and he had to seek asylum in the states because it was dangerous for him to be there. (I was helping him translate a book he had written about his conversion from Islam to atheism into English.)

He said, "I did not like Saddam, but at least he was secular." I got the strong impression that he was unhappy with the wave of fundamentalism that was happening in the country after the fall of that regime.

Iran is probably different though.
shikata ga nai
Generic SC
Profile Joined May 2010
New Zealand179 Posts
August 14 2012 01:45 GMT
#349
On August 11 2012 22:16 T.O.P. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 11 2012 19:49 Littlemuff wrote:
When asian immigrants first came to UK. they were beaten, chased down roads, all sorts.

Happened to me as a tourist to New Zealand last month. 2 cars full of teenagers chased me and my family until we ran to the main road.

Makes me glad to live in California. In a suburb dominated by middle class Asians. People wouldn't even think about pulling that kind of shit.


I would like to apologise on behalf of New Zealand for that. That's actually pretty unusual to have happen. Teenagers can be stupid, but that is no excuses for their behaviour.
jodogohoo
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Canada2533 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 03:40:25
August 14 2012 03:40 GMT
#350
On August 13 2012 15:47 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2012 15:37 jodogohoo wrote:
On August 11 2012 23:31 reincremate wrote:
On August 11 2012 23:22 zalz wrote:
On August 11 2012 23:09 reincremate wrote:
On August 11 2012 15:42 zalz wrote:
Multiculturalism doesn't work. You need some form of cohession, some larger culture that everyone somehow feels a part of.

If not that, it is simply cultural segregation, something which is already a fact in many places in Europe.


Not all cultures are equal.

It works pretty well in Canada (contrary to what white nationalists argue). Here's some stuff explaining why:
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/pdf/pub/multi-state.pdf
http://post.queensu.ca/~bantingk/Canadian_Multiculturalism.pdf

How well people of different groups function relative to other groups is dependent on the social and economic conditions such as ability to find jobs rather than some groups of people just having better belief and value systems that others. Religious and political extremism emerge from tangible problems like not being able to make ends meet while living in a hostile environment. Even in a country like Canada (or any other country with a large immigrant population) where recognition of foreign credentials is an issue (let immigrants in based on credentials, don't give immigrants jobs they're qualified for), muliticulturalism has not been an problem and policies favouring multiculturalism have proven to work.


Canada isn't Europe.

Your position on the world actually influences the kind of refugees you are likely to pick up.

Canada is impossible to reach for economical refugees. Meanwhile, every rich family that doesn't like the political waves in their respective country can book a ticket to Canada or America, depending on their preference.

The economical refugees come for the money, the political refugees come for the culture.

Virutally all immigrants, illegal immigrants and arguably most refugees comes for the money. Immigrants vastly outnumber the other two groups. It's just that the money is more accessible here because we have a system that creates more opportunities. People don't just go "I hate this country, I'm going to Canada". I've never met an immigrant who did not have national/ethnic/religious pride or identity that they brought from their home country with them, but of course that's just anecdotal evidence. But if you read the links or other studies about the sociology of Canada, you'll find that people here identify both as Canadians and as whatever else they want to identify with. For the most part it's simply the fact that Canada is just less xenophobic and has a higher demand for skilled labour.


actually. canada is a bad place for refugees. do not come to canada if you are a refugee ;( this talk/lecture i went to also had refugees / people who were refugees come to the talk and then talk about their experiences and yeah... canada... not so good after all T_T;;

source: http://www.sfu.ca/tlcvan/clients/sfu_woodwards/2012-05-30_Woodwards_Right_to_Refuge_9316/


So I can't run away to Canada once the crazy conservatives take over America?

Sad...

you probably want to escape to finland, why? cause their education program is godlike. in 50 years, it will be a super nation of utopian awesomeness.

source: my imagination, and wikipedia... and some background in the study of education... / sociology
Kavallerie
Profile Joined August 2012
Germany89 Posts
August 14 2012 09:22 GMT
#351
Multiculturalism should be allowed to an extent. However you can't stop racism because it comes naturally for all humans. Therefore a heavy amount of multiculturalism is not healthy for otherwise homogeneous nations.
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 14 2012 09:49 GMT
#352
TBH this boils back a lot to exactly *what ideas* hold all of humanity together. What thoughts can we all share, on a guaranteed basis?
Что?
Kavallerie
Profile Joined August 2012
Germany89 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 10:05:32
August 14 2012 10:03 GMT
#353
Even in Germany, where there are a lot of Turkish immigrants (they are citizens of Germany and a few are Turkish citizens), there is sometimes quite a bit of ethnic tension here and there. There are now parliamentarians within the German government who have Turkish ancestry.

Turks now have a voice in German politics and mostly vote for the Social Democratic Party.

Believe or not, Germans and Turks get along pretty well minus a few ethnic violence incidents back in the 1990s. However a lot of conservative Germans are still against granting Turks citizenship. I am not really against it but I would be more careful as to who Germany should grant citizenship to.
Shady Sands
Profile Blog Joined June 2012
United States4021 Posts
August 14 2012 10:06 GMT
#354
On August 14 2012 19:03 Kavallerie wrote:
Even in Germany, where there are a lot of Turkish immigrants (they are citizens of Germany or at least permanent residents), there is sometimes quite a bit of ethnic tension here and there. There are now parliamentarians within the German government who have Turkish ancestry.

Turks now have a voice in German politics and mostly vote for the Social Democratic Party.

Believe or not, Turks and Germans get along pretty well minus a few ethnic violence incidents back in the 1990s. However a lot of conservative Germans are still against granting Turks citizenship. I am not really against it but I would be more careful as to who Germany should grant citizenship to.


See, that's because most Turkish immigrants and average Germans actually share quite a bit in common--namely, a focus on honest work, clean living, and a desire for self-improvement. Countries where the immigrant population doesn't share that sentiment have much more problems, although such examples are *extremely* rare.
Что?
Euronyme
Profile Joined August 2010
Sweden3804 Posts
August 14 2012 11:03 GMT
#355
On August 14 2012 18:22 Kavallerie wrote:
Multiculturalism should be allowed to an extent. However you can't stop racism because it comes naturally for all humans. Therefore a heavy amount of multiculturalism is not healthy for otherwise homogeneous nations.


Why would racism be natural? Racism has to do with prejudice. Prejudice is not something that comes naturally.
I bet i can maı̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̨̨̨̨̨̨ke you wipe your screen.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4338 Posts
August 14 2012 11:41 GMT
#356
On August 14 2012 19:03 Kavallerie wrote:
Even in Germany, where there are a lot of Turkish immigrants (they are citizens of Germany and a few are Turkish citizens), there is sometimes quite a bit of ethnic tension here and there. There are now parliamentarians within the German government who have Turkish ancestry.

Turks now have a voice in German politics and mostly vote for the Social Democratic Party.

Believe or not, Germans and Turks get along pretty well minus a few ethnic violence incidents back in the 1990s. However a lot of conservative Germans are still against granting Turks citizenship. I am not really against it but I would be more careful as to who Germany should grant citizenship to.

Interesting , actually i am subscribed to Russia Today on youtube and they made a video report today saying that many Turks are leaving Europe now because of economic issues there.They showed graphic stating economic growth in Turkey last year was 7.5% whereas in Europe is was i think 1.6%.We are not just talking recent immigrants either but people hwo were born in Europe with Turkish ancestry.

This also fits in with an article i read a month or so ago showing many Mexican illegal immigrants to the US are also moving back to Mexico due to downturn in the economy particularly construction sectors in the US so yes it is mostly economic.

In short when the governments of western nations keep cutting back welfare payments and the economies continue declining many of these foreigners will go home.Do not forget also that bad economic conditions leads to rise in nationalism.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6231 Posts
August 14 2012 11:46 GMT
#357
On August 14 2012 20:03 Euronyme wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2012 18:22 Kavallerie wrote:
Multiculturalism should be allowed to an extent. However you can't stop racism because it comes naturally for all humans. Therefore a heavy amount of multiculturalism is not healthy for otherwise homogeneous nations.


Why would racism be natural? Racism has to do with prejudice. Prejudice is not something that comes naturally.

And yet it excists in every part of the world. Everyone is prejudiced to some extent anyway it's very normal for people to already judge someone by just looking at them and not knowing them at all.
Kavallerie
Profile Joined August 2012
Germany89 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-14 12:19:01
August 14 2012 12:16 GMT
#358
On August 14 2012 20:03 Euronyme wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2012 18:22 Kavallerie wrote:
Multiculturalism should be allowed to an extent. However you can't stop racism because it comes naturally for all humans. Therefore a heavy amount of multiculturalism is not healthy for otherwise homogeneous nations.


Why would racism be natural? Racism has to do with prejudice. Prejudice is not something that comes naturally.


Racism comes naturally, whether you would like to believe it or not. Many people are "racist" without even recognizing themselves as racists. That's why I don't like how the word "racist" is used in its current meaning as depicted by the media.

If you define yourself as part of the European or Caucasian race, there you go, you believe that a division in race exists in the world.

Racism and prejudice based on racism are two entirely different things. Discriminating someone based on race, now that is against the law and should not come naturally. However it does for some people.
Scootaloo
Profile Joined January 2012
655 Posts
August 14 2012 12:22 GMT
#359
Funny how there's never a mention of a south-east asian immigrant in this thread, while there are a ton of them in Europe, something to realize about them is that their social architecture is a lot more developed, their culture given time to mature, in effect their morals are better developed, they have a harder working mentality and are for all intents and purposes much closer to Europeans (even a communist chinese) then someone from the middle east.

We always consider cultures to be beautiful things that need to be nurtured or developed, this is complete bullshit ofcourse, some cultures should be discarded in favor of whatever the regional variety is, specifcally the European muslims, when considering a Muslim culture you have to realize that in 600-800 AD most muslim countries where conquered and forcibly made to accept Islam and arab culture, especially the second one is relevant as arab culture is nomadic, whereas practically all of the conquered where sedentary argrarically based kingdoms, due to this many prosperous north african countries fell into obscurity as nomads can not support a city and it would take until they reimbraced a sedentary non arabic, and in essence, non Islamic culture until they became actual powers again (the Moors or secular Turks for instance).

What this also means is that practically all muslim cultures are younger then 1400 years, a paltry sum compared to the amount of time Chinese or French had and which also easily explains why Islam seems so ass backwards when it comes to morals and freedom, it hasn't been given the time required yet to form a functional culture compared to the ones we are more familiar with.
ggrrg
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Bulgaria2716 Posts
August 14 2012 12:40 GMT
#360
On August 14 2012 19:03 Kavallerie wrote:
Even in Germany, where there are a lot of Turkish immigrants (they are citizens of Germany and a few are Turkish citizens), there is sometimes quite a bit of ethnic tension here and there. There are now parliamentarians within the German government who have Turkish ancestry.

Turks now have a voice in German politics and mostly vote for the Social Democratic Party.

Believe or not, Germans and Turks get along pretty well minus a few ethnic violence incidents back in the 1990s. However a lot of conservative Germans are still against granting Turks citizenship. I am not really against it but I would be more careful as to who Germany should grant citizenship to.


It's true that normally Germans and Turks get along but there are still problems associated mainly with the Turkish population in Germany. With them being the largest foreign group in Germany, there are a lot of areas where they have segregated from the local society to such an extent that they interact only with eachother and there is the strange phenomenom of third generation Turks who cannot speak any German. Just take a look at Berlin Neu-Köln, Köln Ehrenfeld/Mülheim, and some parts of the Ruhr Gebiet. A lot of people with Turkish ancestry have integrated really well in society but there is still a significant part that unfortunately is not. That's one of the reasons why there was such an uproar when Erdogan spoke in front of 20k Turks in Cologne and told them that the most important thing for them is to keep their Turkish culture and shouldn't adopt Germany's one...

On August 14 2012 20:41 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2012 19:03 Kavallerie wrote:
Even in Germany, where there are a lot of Turkish immigrants (they are citizens of Germany and a few are Turkish citizens), there is sometimes quite a bit of ethnic tension here and there. There are now parliamentarians within the German government who have Turkish ancestry.

Turks now have a voice in German politics and mostly vote for the Social Democratic Party.

Believe or not, Germans and Turks get along pretty well minus a few ethnic violence incidents back in the 1990s. However a lot of conservative Germans are still against granting Turks citizenship. I am not really against it but I would be more careful as to who Germany should grant citizenship to.

Interesting , actually i am subscribed to Russia Today on youtube and they made a video report today saying that many Turks are leaving Europe now because of economic issues there.They showed graphic stating economic growth in Turkey last year was 7.5% whereas in Europe is was i think 1.6%.We are not just talking recent immigrants either but people hwo were born in Europe with Turkish ancestry.

This also fits in with an article i read a month or so ago showing many Mexican illegal immigrants to the US are also moving back to Mexico due to downturn in the economy particularly construction sectors in the US so yes it is mostly economic.

In short when the governments of western nations keep cutting back welfare payments and the economies continue declining many of these foreigners will go home.Do not forget also that bad economic conditions leads to rise in nationalism.


Wages for unskilled and even skilled labor in Turkey are still lower than welfare checks in Germany, nevermind actual wages. The same applies to other European countries with a large Turkish population. I know several people born in Germany who are from Turskish ancestry and decided to live in Turkey, but none of them chose this because of the economic situation.
Prev 1 16 17 18 19 20 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 57m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 260
SteadfastSC 179
CosmosSc2 41
ROOTCatZ 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 13202
Artosis 698
Shuttle 341
Aegong 51
Sexy 34
ZZZero.O 16
Dota 2
monkeys_forever644
League of Legends
JimRising 1797
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K417
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King39
Other Games
summit1g7240
FrodaN1352
shahzam738
C9.Mang0140
Trikslyr44
ViBE13
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 54
• davetesta32
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5096
• imaqtpie1557
• Shiphtur321
Other Games
• Scarra1490
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
10h 57m
Zoun vs Classic
Map Test Tournament
11h 57m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 3h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 10h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.