• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:22
CEST 22:22
KST 05:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 General Discussion Pros React To: SoulKey's 5-Peat Challenge
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1228 users

The Free World Charter - Page 62

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 60 61 62 63 64 75 Next
ey215
Profile Joined June 2010
United States546 Posts
May 18 2012 00:01 GMT
#1221
On May 18 2012 08:52 Rassy wrote:
"I'd rather not have a product being completely sold out, because some retards voted for or against production"

Yes that would be annoying, but this is not how it would work off course.
It could be though that you wanted a product wich only verry few other people would want.
Then to make that product would be highly inefficient, you would have to sacrifice other products wich might be more popular.

People have to be a bit flexible here and a bit more idealistic, this is nothing for short term.
Ask yourself this question:
How should we go to the stars?
Should we be the ferengi or should we be voyager.
Come on people, dare to dream.


The system you are talking about already exists. It's called the free market. When in the market for goods and services people vote every time the purchase something and at what price.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 00:06 GMT
#1222
On May 18 2012 08:45 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2012 05:25 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On May 18 2012 05:15 DeliCiousVP wrote:
On May 18 2012 04:49 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
In a RBE (Resource Based Economy) how do you evaluate whether or not building a steel mill is:

a) worth the resources it will consume in its construction and use
b) a better use of resources than other options

Note: you do not have infinite resources - building the steel mill will mean that something else that is wanted will not be built.


Well first of we will create an abundance compared what we have today, But im sure this situation will emerge at some point for some resource so it is a valid question.

a Triarch similiar to what doctors use today would be applied to prioritise, Based on human need first as mentioned here.
http://zeitnewsblog.blogspot.se/2011/03/meeting-human-needs-how-resource-based.html

Second it would be based upon the importance it holds to all of human kind as a whole, It is hard for individuals like you
to understand such values since you dont have them yet, Full transperancy of where resources are allocated would be available to all.

Thirdly creating synthetic substitues for resource we cannot make abundance is gonna be an important part of society any society. We dont make houses out of diamonds.

I cannot stress enough the abundance of resources we will have compared to today, using the latest technology to conserve,recycle,extract and synthesize. We will have very little waste!

I will stop writting solved so you guys dont get to upset.Instead ill express what i personaly feel about the questions you ask.

VALID QUESTION


Not a valid answer.

How do you "prioritize needs?" Do you stop producing iPads until Africa is fed? What is more important water or food? Shelter or electricity? Roads or cars? Buses or boats? Science or art?

You cannot say that you will create an abundance later. The question pertains to NOW.


http://zeitnewsblog.blogspot.se/2011/03/meeting-human-needs-how-resource-based.html you practicly livei n this thread i suggest you read this all of it.



Read it. All of it. Question is still not answered.

Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
May 18 2012 00:10 GMT
#1223
On May 18 2012 08:52 Rassy wrote:
"I'd rather not have a product being completely sold out, because some retards voted for or against production"

Yes that would be annoying, but this is not how it would work off course.
Capitalism doesnt avoid this problem btw, as there are tons of products wich i would like to buy for cost price+some profit, wich are not available while they technological possible.
It could be though that you wanted a product wich only verry few other people would want.
Then to make that product would be highly inefficient, you would have to sacrifice other products wich might be more popular.

People have to be a bit flexible here and a bit more idealistic, this is nothing for short term.
Ask yourself this question:
How should we go to the stars?
Should we be the ferengi or should we be voyager.
Come on people, dare to dream.


You've presented nothing that would beat our current system, even on a theoretical level. Sorry.

Disregarding the direct-economy-control side, I do think that the internet might allow for more direct democracy decisions on a local level in the future. I'm not, however, too sure it's a good idea. But it's going to be an interesting future for sure.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
May 18 2012 00:38 GMT
#1224

Every person should be guaranteed the highest technically possible standard of living without the use of money, trade or debt. There is no longer any logical reason not to do this. Virtually all of human suffering is caused by our outdated system of exchange.

All forms of debt and subordination are not only a hindrance to progress, but are now completely unnecessary. This is due to our command of technology and the ease with which we can produce and manufacture goods for ourselves.


Why would anyone give people the "highest possible" standard of living? In other points of the charter they're all about "reasonable use of resources" and so on. Wouldn't a system where you don't have (for example) a computer or a TV at home, but they are easily available for the public in libraries, schools, community centers and such? This way you invigorate social life and deal with quite a bit of procrastination (it's harder to use computer for procrastination in public places than at night in your cozy home).


People who, for any reason, are unable to look after themselves or contribute back into society, should be afforded every possible amenity, compassion and care from the rest of the community without obligation.


Someone earlier in the thread stated that some of their statements are very vague, even though they claim them not to be. How about this one? I understand it's about disabled, very old, very young and people otherwise excluded from your usual productive life, but this statement just as well encompassess all those who simply don't want to do anything.



In general, the idea for the kind of world this charter proposes is nice. Unfortunately it's just not possible, especially in the democracy and capitalism ridden world we have now.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Rassy
Profile Joined August 2010
Netherlands2308 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-18 01:09:50
May 18 2012 01:08 GMT
#1225
Ok this is a lost case i have to be realistic, the time is not right.

After decades of breaking down human spirit by soap tv, porn and tabloids, people have lost their imagination and dreams.
They accept the life they have without questions and complaints, and most of all they dont want it to change.
Are they realy happy with it though?
Well this is hard to tell but a poll wich showed that 50%+ of tl would be willing to risk his life with a 1/100 change to get 1m$ makes me doubt this.
Monney has become so important to people, well rather the lack of monney that manny are willing to take a 1/100 change of dying to get 1m.
1m isnt a large amount by anny means, wich only emphasises how desperate people are for monney.

Noone answered my question btw.

Do people realy think we will go to the stars as capitalists?
And if so, should we even want that?

Capitalism and competition have never achieved annything in space or physics.
Contrary to global cooperation and idealistic people who didnt do it for the monney but because they loved it.
When i was watching voyager ages ago i hated the ferengi and i think most people here do.
People know intuivily that this is not the right way,but they dont want to admit it and they fear the changes that might come.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
May 18 2012 01:40 GMT
#1226
On May 18 2012 10:08 Rassy wrote:
Do people realy think we will go to the stars as capitalists?
And if so, should we even want that?


Capitalism and competition have never achieved annything in space or physics.
Contrary to global cooperation and idealistic people who didnt do it for the monney but because they loved it.
When i was watching voyager ages ago i hated the ferengi and i think most people here do.
People know intuivily that this is not the right way,but they dont want to admit it and they fear the changes that might come.


Yet somehow your questions are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. Are you seriously suggesting that we organize socity in a way to "reach the stars" - according to your subjective view of this being the ultimate goal?

Not only that but there's nothing stopping you from setting up a space company and asking for donations, charging for advertisements or creating some other form of income to your company. If people actually wanted this (above something else they value) then it'd happen. And, guess what, it is already happening.

I took the liberty of disregarding the start of your post as it seemed a bit too detached from reality.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-18 01:47:47
May 18 2012 01:41 GMT
#1227
Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.


Source/Relevance? we arent answering this today either you think we need to be all knowing to move out of this shit system? There are plenty of problems that will still remain we wiill never achive perfection. There are problems not caused by the monetary system such as emotional inpaired reasoning like you are having right now.

But this system is designed its the scientific method applied to society there is no better rule for governing society in existence at this point in time.





A little bit more casual and chilled out talk.
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-18 01:50:47
May 18 2012 01:46 GMT
#1228
On May 18 2012 10:41 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.


Source/Relevance? we arent answering this today either you think we need to be all knowing to move out of this shit system? There are plenty of problems that will still remain we wiill never achive perfection. There are problems not caused by the monetary system such as emotional inpaired reasoning like you are having right now.

But this system is designed its the scientific method applied to society there is no better rule for governing society in existence at this point in time.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iT3A1vXp9B4


Yes, you need to be damn well sure that you know what you're doing. Otherwise you'll collapse society, causing conflict and societal regress, because you're too stupid to run the country properly, however noble your intentions were. Not only that, but you actually did claim this system would achieve perfection and abundance for all, eliminate conflict, and so on.

As for the second part of your post; Do you even know why we have politics? You can't replace politics with "the scientific model". It's already used in all places where it's actually possible. (well, it's not foolproof, governments are full of both incompetent employees and ignorant politicians, more so in some countries than others, but still). It's like you actually believe countries are run by people just imagining shit while in reality it's the exact opposite, they go with what's tried and tested and what research has showed to be the best option. I'm sure you've heard of the word ideology. I'm just going to state this again: This so called movement of yours is an ideology and as such would be a political decision to implement. It would compete with other ideologies (and all the ideologies which are active today involve capitalism, for good reason. You'd be the new commie party, and with the new busswords you might actually get some votes).
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 02:26 GMT
#1229
On May 18 2012 10:41 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.


Source/Relevance? we arent answering this today either you think we need to be all knowing to move out of this shit system? There are plenty of problems that will still remain we wiill never achive perfection. There are problems not caused by the monetary system such as emotional inpaired reasoning like you are having right now.


Lol!

Source:


Start at 44:18 to around 55:00 Peter later brings in an engineer who completely fails to even understand the question.

Relevance:
Really? I asked you a question (you asked for questions BTW) and you failed to answer it. I then pointed out that NO ONE ELSE involved in RBE has EVER answered that question either. If you can't operate the system that we can't use it. If you can't figure out how to operate the system after working on it for 40 years then it's probably a crap system.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-05-18 02:56:22
May 18 2012 02:54 GMT
#1230
but you actually did claim this system would achieve perfection and abundance for all, eliminate conflict, and so on.

I didnt promise any form of perfection but yes there would be abundance and an end to conflicts as destructive as the ones we have today. And abundance is not the same as infinite.

Also alot of what you say is just outright false and naive thats why i dont respond to it so dont feel neglected, i read it.

Relevance:
Really? I asked you a question (you asked for questions BTW) and you failed to answer it. I then pointed out that NO ONE ELSE involved in RBE has EVER answered that question either. If you can't operate the system that we can't use it. If you can't figure out how to operate the system after working on it for 40 years then it's probably a crap system.


you should read my response throughly
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 03:00 GMT
#1231
On May 18 2012 11:54 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
but you actually did claim this system would achieve perfection and abundance for all, eliminate conflict, and so on.

I didnt promise any form of perfection but yes there would be abundance and an end to conflicts as destructive as the ones we have today. And abundance is not the same as infinite.



You have yet to show that you have something that is in the slightest bit workable. You can't even figure out if a steel mill should be built or not. All you are doing is saying nice things. That is not an argument, let alone proof or facts or data.

That is PROPAGANDA.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
May 18 2012 03:18 GMT
#1232
Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.

Still waiting on the source of this.

Start at 44:18 to around 55:00 Peter later brings in an engineer who completely fails to even understand the question.

The person speaking at 44:00-55:00 is not peter joseph btw.
Relevance:
Really? I asked you a question (you asked for questions BTW) and you failed to answer it. I then pointed out that NO ONE ELSE involved in RBE has EVER answered that question either. If you can't operate the system that we can't use it. If you can't figure out how to operate the system after working on it for 40 years then it's probably a crap system.


And to answer this trivial question, Demand if someone requests a product it will be saved and entered into the system demand of a good or service will be meassured and production/Infrastructure adapted for it. Values will also be studied and the commericial society that we have today will go out the door.

The reason i asked for relevance is because you assume that our economy today works properly, Obviously it does not and as mentioned in the video "We are not looking to reinvent the wheel" any useful ways to gather data that is benefcial to humanity as a whole will be used and developed in the future even if it served a monetary system.
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 03:58 GMT
#1233
On May 18 2012 12:18 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.

Still waiting on the source of this.
Show nested quote +

Start at 44:18 to around 55:00 Peter later brings in an engineer who completely fails to even understand the question.

The person speaking at 44:00-55:00 is not peter joseph btw.
Show nested quote +
Relevance:
Really? I asked you a question (you asked for questions BTW) and you failed to answer it. I then pointed out that NO ONE ELSE involved in RBE has EVER answered that question either. If you can't operate the system that we can't use it. If you can't figure out how to operate the system after working on it for 40 years then it's probably a crap system.


And to answer this trivial question, Demand if someone requests a product it will be saved and entered into the system demand of a good or service will be meassured and production/Infrastructure adapted for it. Values will also be studied and the commericial society that we have today will go out the door.

The reason i asked for relevance is because you assume that our economy today works properly, Obviously it does not and as mentioned in the video "We are not looking to reinvent the wheel" any useful ways to gather data that is benefcial to humanity as a whole will be used and developed in the future even if it served a monetary system.


The person you see is Stefan Molyneux and the person on the phone introduces himself as Peter Joseph. It is a debate between the two.

"We are not looking to reinvent the wheel" shows that they have no clue. They have only looked at the economy from the consumer side and have paid zero attention to how things are poduced. You cannot simply "make what people want" since that does not consider, at all, what resources go into their production (efficiency). As stated time and again you cannot, you absolutely cannot copy the current methods for determining production since they rely entirely on price. You DO need to reinvent the wheel.





DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
May 18 2012 04:10 GMT
#1234
The person you see is Stefan Molyneux and the person on the phone introduces himself as Peter Joseph. It is a debate between the two.

Thats just an automated message they have in V-radio they have one with jacue fresco and roxanne aswel. Also you didnt notice the voice didnt fit? and i guess you never seen the Zeitgeist movies either.

Lets continue talking about this, after you seen some more material you havent realy found a tressure trove of flaws like you think most if not all of what you talk about is in the films.

And dont lie and make up qoutes like this one, and please dont waste time wyrming your way out of it just go watch the movies.

Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.


www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 04:20 GMT
#1235
On May 18 2012 13:10 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
The person you see is Stefan Molyneux and the person on the phone introduces himself as Peter Joseph. It is a debate between the two.

Thats just an automated message they have in V-radio they have one with jacue fresco and roxanne aswel. Also you didnt notice the voice didnt fit? and i guess you never seen the Zeitgeist movies either.

Lets continue talking about this, after you seen some more material you havent realy found a tressure trove of flaws like you think most if not all of what you talk about is in the films.

And dont lie and make up qoutes like this one, and please dont waste time wyrming your way out of it just go watch the movies.

Show nested quote +
Peter Joseph himself has said that the question has not been answered by Zeitgeist or Jacque Fresco or the Venus project. All he's said is that even though they haven't answered it in the past 40 years that they've been working on it, once in charge they'll figure it out.



It's not a lie (or a quote for that matter) it's the 100% truth.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 04:32 GMT
#1236
DeliCiousVP so at this point if you can't answer the question beyond posting links to 2hr long propaganda films then I'm done with this little debate even though it's been fun . It's a simple question in market economies but a huge question as to how a RBE will be run in the real world. If it (in both parts 'a' and 'b') cannot be answered thoroughly then the RBE cannot work.

Here's the question again.

In a RBE (Resource Based Economy) how do you evaluate whether or not building a steel mill is:

a) worth the specific resources it will consume in its construction and use
b) a better use of resources than other options

Note: you do not have infinite resources - building the steel mill will mean that something else that is wanted will not be built.
DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
May 18 2012 04:51 GMT
#1237
On May 18 2012 13:32 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
DeliCiousVP so at this point if you can't answer the question beyond posting links to 2hr long propaganda films then I'm done with this little debate even though it's been fun . It's a simple question in market economies but a huge question as to how a RBE will be run in the real world. If it (in both parts 'a' and 'b') cannot be answered thoroughly then the RBE cannot work.

Here's the question again.

In a RBE (Resource Based Economy) how do you evaluate whether or not building a steel mill is:

a) worth the specific resources it will consume in its construction and use
b) a better use of resources than other options

Note: you do not have infinite resources - building the steel mill will mean that something else that is wanted will not be built.


You had your answer and you have the material provided. And you did lie because you claimed they admited that yet they had done no such thing. You argue like a politician and are more intressted in winning then learning you can go win in your corner somewhere.
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Kiarip
Profile Joined August 2008
United States1835 Posts
May 18 2012 04:54 GMT
#1238
On May 18 2012 13:32 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
DeliCiousVP so at this point if you can't answer the question beyond posting links to 2hr long propaganda films then I'm done with this little debate even though it's been fun . It's a simple question in market economies but a huge question as to how a RBE will be run in the real world. If it (in both parts 'a' and 'b') cannot be answered thoroughly then the RBE cannot work.

Here's the question again.

In a RBE (Resource Based Economy) how do you evaluate whether or not building a steel mill is:

a) worth the specific resources it will consume in its construction and use
b) a better use of resources than other options

Note: you do not have infinite resources - building the steel mill will mean that something else that is wanted will not be built.

Of course he has no answer to this...

All attempts at Utilitarian central control economies have failed and will continue to fail, and can never succeed, because we as humans are individualists, and the social circle of the people we actually care about is much smaller than the society that we live in, so we have dissenting interests, the "fair" reconciliation of which is a problem of exponential mathematical complexity, meaning it's not solvable in practice, at least in a dynamic system.

We're not bees or ants in a single hive or anthill, we don't all share a common purpose without coercion.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
May 18 2012 05:17 GMT
#1239
On May 18 2012 13:51 DeliCiousVP wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2012 13:32 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
DeliCiousVP so at this Point if you can't Answer the question beyond posting links to 2hr long propaganda films then I'M done with this little debate even though it'S been fun . It'S a simple question in market economies but a huge question as to how a RBE will be run in the ReaL world. If it (in both parts 'a' and 'b') cannot be answered thoroughly then the RBE cannot work.

Here'S the question again.

In a RBE (Resource Based Economy) how do you evaluate whether or not building a steel mill is:

a) worth the specific resources it will consume in its construction and use
b) a better use of resources than other options

Note: you do not have infinite resources - building the steel mill will mean that something else that is wanted will not be built.


You had your Answer and you have the material provided. And you did lie because you claimed they admited that yet they had done no such thing. You argue like a politician and are more intressted in winning then learning you can go win in your corner somewhere.


I consider being asked a direct question and not responding with an answer (as you are now) to mean that you, in fact, have no answer to the question. Furthermore, by being asked a question, and producing no answer, you (or anyone else) are inherently admitting that you do not have one.

I think I'm done here.

DeliCiousVP
Profile Joined September 2011
Sweden343 Posts
May 18 2012 05:17 GMT
#1240
On May 18 2012 13:54 Kiarip wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 18 2012 13:32 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
DeliCiousVP so at this point if you can't answer the question beyond posting links to 2hr long propaganda films then I'm done with this little debate even though it's been fun . It's a simple question in market economies but a huge question as to how a RBE will be run in the real world. If it (in both parts 'a' and 'b') cannot be answered thoroughly then the RBE cannot work.

Here's the question again.

In a RBE (Resource Based Economy) how do you evaluate whether or not building a steel mill is:

a) worth the specific resources it will consume in its construction and use
b) a better use of resources than other options

Note: you do not have infinite resources - building the steel mill will mean that something else that is wanted will not be built.

Of course he has no answer to this...

All attempts at Utilitarian central control economies have failed and will continue to fail, and can never succeed, because we as humans are individualists, and the social circle of the people we actually care about is much smaller than the society that we live in, so we have dissenting interests, the "fair" reconciliation of which is a problem of exponential mathematical complexity, meaning it's not solvable in practice, at least in a dynamic system.

We're not bees or ants in a single hive or anthill, we don't all share a common purpose without coercion.


You say we dont share the common purpose as a need ? So its just fiction that we need food water and shelter? You are not an individual capable of critical thinking you are a guardian of the status quo which is the absolute opposite of an well informed individual.

Its cute to be so naive, and dangerous to be so ignorant.
www.youtube.com/user/DeliCiousTZM
Prev 1 60 61 62 63 64 75 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
19:00
Mid Season Playoffs
Gerald vs ArTLIVE!
Solar vs goblin
Nicoract vs TBD
Spirit vs Percival
Cham vs TBD
ByuN vs Jumy
SteadfastSC1141
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SteadfastSC 1141
UpATreeSC 127
ZombieGrub96
JuggernautJason70
Lillekanin 9
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 20520
Calm 1963
Rain 1562
Shuttle 511
Dewaltoss 96
ggaemo 30
Hm[arnc] 7
Dota 2
Dendi1359
Pyrionflax226
NeuroSwarm111
Counter-Strike
apEX2336
fl0m1140
Stewie2K373
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu518
Other Games
Grubby3684
FrodaN1836
Beastyqt511
summit1g247
ToD195
Hui .182
C9.Mang0129
ArmadaUGS119
Trikslyr56
Kaelaris7
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 57
• davetesta9
• Reevou 2
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix16
• Pr0nogo 4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21787
Other Games
• Scarra788
• imaqtpie784
• WagamamaTV270
• Shiphtur178
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
13h 39m
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
Map Test Tournament
14h 39m
The PondCast
16h 39m
RSL Revival
1d 13h
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Online Event
3 days
[ Show More ]
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
LiuLi Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.