• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:43
CEST 16:43
KST 23:43
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Inheritors16
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !10Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results1
StarCraft 2
General
MaNa leaves Team Liquid Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple
Tourneys
2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers $5,000 WardiTV Spring Championship 2026 Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! SC2 INu's Battles#16 <BO.9> Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
ASL Tickets to Live Event Finals? Flashes ASL S21 Ro8 Review BW General Discussion Pros React To: Leta vs Tulbo (ASL S21, Ro.8) (Spoiler) Interview ASL Ro4 Day 2 Winner
Tourneys
[ASL21] Semifinals B [ASL21] Semifinals A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL22] RO16 Group Stage - 02 - 10 May
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game PC Games Sales Thread
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1673 users

President Obama Re-Elected - Page 362

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 360 361 362 363 364 1504 Next
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here.

The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301
Liman
Profile Joined July 2012
Serbia681 Posts
August 30 2012 11:43 GMT
#7221


As non-American i found that it doesnt matter who is US president,because that person is just for show.Real power is in the hands of industrialists (not all of them are even americans).
Elections and politics are used to make people think they have a choice and that their oppinion matters.

I believe this thread is pointless.
Freelancer veteran
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
August 30 2012 11:50 GMT
#7222
On August 30 2012 20:43 Liman wrote:


As non-American i found that it doesnt matter who is US president,because that person is just for show.Real power is in the hands of industrialists (not all of them are even americans).
Elections and politics are used to make people think they have a choice and that their oppinion matters.

I believe this thread is pointless.

You didn't "find" that. You think that. And you're wrong.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Praetorial
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States4241 Posts
August 30 2012 12:06 GMT
#7223
On August 30 2012 20:43 Liman wrote:


As non-American i found that it doesnt matter who is US president,because that person is just for show.Real power is in the hands of industrialists (not all of them are even americans).
Elections and politics are used to make people think they have a choice and that their oppinion matters.

I believe this thread is pointless.


Because the Yugoslavian countries are all about democracy and freedom of choice in elections, right?

No. It doesn't work like that. People have votes. Them votes are counted, and a president is elected using the electoral college as a means of bunching votes together. Industrialists and lobbyists can only influence, not force a person to vote one way or another.
FOR GREAT JUSTICE! Bans for the ban gods!
Agathon
Profile Joined February 2011
France1505 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-30 12:24:24
August 30 2012 12:21 GMT
#7224
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...
"C'est au pied du mur, qu'on voit le mieux...le mur".
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-30 13:01:15
August 30 2012 12:58 GMT
#7225
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

"We're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers" -Romney campaign.

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/mitt-romney-_n_1836139.html

This statement is in response to criticisms of Romney's ads claiming that Obama will remove the work requirement to get welfare, which fact checkers have called a "pants on fire" lie: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/aug/07/mitt-romney/mitt-romney-says-barack-obamas-plan-abandons-tenet/

There are other lies too. See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/29/opinion/how-the-republicans-built-it.html/?_r=1&hp
http://keller.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/28/lies-damn-lies-and-gop-video/
Liman
Profile Joined July 2012
Serbia681 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-30 13:03:32
August 30 2012 13:02 GMT
#7226
On August 30 2012 21:06 Praetorial wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 20:43 Liman wrote:


As non-American i found that it doesnt matter who is US president,because that person is just for show.Real power is in the hands of industrialists (not all of them are even americans).
Elections and politics are used to make people think they have a choice and that their oppinion matters.

I believe this thread is pointless.


Because the Yugoslavian countries are all about democracy and freedom of choice in elections, right?

No. It doesn't work like that. People have votes. Them votes are counted, and a president is elected using the electoral college as a means of bunching votes together. Industrialists and lobbyists can only influence, not force a person to vote one way or another.


Ex Yugoslavian countries are the best example of fake democracies,we see the influence of Industrialists in our countries.That is why I understand much better than you what ``democracy`` rely is.
In this day and age its naive to think that your vote can change anything.
Sorry.


And sorry for being off topic.
Freelancer veteran
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-30 13:10:50
August 30 2012 13:10 GMT
#7227
On August 30 2012 22:02 Liman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 21:06 Praetorial wrote:
On August 30 2012 20:43 Liman wrote:


As non-American i found that it doesnt matter who is US president,because that person is just for show.Real power is in the hands of industrialists (not all of them are even americans).
Elections and politics are used to make people think they have a choice and that their oppinion matters.

I believe this thread is pointless.


Because the Yugoslavian countries are all about democracy and freedom of choice in elections, right?

No. It doesn't work like that. People have votes. Them votes are counted, and a president is elected using the electoral college as a means of bunching votes together. Industrialists and lobbyists can only influence, not force a person to vote one way or another.


Ex Yugoslavian countries are the best example of fake democracies,we see the influence of Industrialists in our countries.That is why I understand much better than you what ``democracy`` rely is.
In this day and age its naive to think that your vote can change anything.
Sorry.


And sorry for being off topic.

To quote John Taylor:
[image loading]
Jumbled
Profile Joined September 2010
1543 Posts
August 30 2012 13:55 GMT
#7228
On August 30 2012 21:58 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

"We're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers" -Romney campaign.

That quote is brilliant. It really sums up the entire republican platform.
jungsu
Profile Joined February 2010
United States279 Posts
August 30 2012 15:44 GMT
#7229
"Our rights come from nature and god, and not from government!"

Well then what do I need to worry about?!? It's all taken care of! Thanks Ryan!

/sarcasm
go nony
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
August 30 2012 16:14 GMT
#7230
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

The problem is that "fact checking" makes it sound objective. But it's not. Fact checking articles are editorials where the writer is judge, jury, and executioner of whether a statement is "factual". They're opinions.

I think they're a good part of a vibrant discussion, mind you. I just don't like the name because it's misleading.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
August 30 2012 16:15 GMT
#7231
On August 30 2012 16:56 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 15:53 Danglars wrote:
On August 30 2012 14:01 ticklishmusic wrote:
It's a shame that Romney's media appearances are so tightly regulated that no one has been able to force him to admit that a good half of his campaign is built on quoting Obama out of context.

Though it would be fair to say that this tight handling applies to most politicians.

We’ve already made a trillion dollars’ worth of cuts. We can make some more cuts in programs that don’t work, and make government work more efficiently…We can make another trillion or trillion-two, and what we then do is ask for the wealthy to pay a little bit more …

There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me, because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something – there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.

Well, there's the context. Now tell me that Obama does not believe that government is more responsible for your business's success than you were. You are just doing what the fine list of government's assets, including teachers, the internet, "American system", and roads and bridges, enabled you to do. This has been the centerpiece of Romney's recent campaign commercials and for good reason.

Again, he never said the government was "more responsible" for your success than you were. He was simply pointing out that it ALSO plays an important role, that individual initiative does not happen in a vacuum. I really don't get how there can still be confusion over this.


At this point conservatives simply don't trust Obama when it comes to the economy due to choices he has made (like the GM bailout). They see him as a socialist and "you didn't build that" symbolizes that belief. The actual context of the phrase is irrelevant at this point.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
August 30 2012 16:19 GMT
#7232
On August 31 2012 01:14 coverpunch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

The problem is that "fact checking" makes it sound objective. But it's not. Fact checking articles are editorials where the writer is judge, jury, and executioner of whether a statement is "factual". They're opinions.

I think they're a good part of a vibrant discussion, mind you. I just don't like the name because it's misleading.

Politifact peddles all sorts of bullshit under the guise of "fact checking."
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
August 30 2012 16:19 GMT
#7233
On August 31 2012 00:44 jungsu wrote:
"Our rights come from nature and god, and not from government!"

Well then what do I need to worry about?!? It's all taken care of! Thanks Ryan!

/sarcasm

We're been through this on this thread. It's actually a pretty important distinction. Rights given by the government can be taken away by the government. The whole point of "human rights" is that they're inherent and can't be lawfully taken away.
Derez
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Netherlands6068 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-30 16:25:41
August 30 2012 16:23 GMT
#7234
On August 31 2012 01:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 16:56 kwizach wrote:
On August 30 2012 15:53 Danglars wrote:
On August 30 2012 14:01 ticklishmusic wrote:
It's a shame that Romney's media appearances are so tightly regulated that no one has been able to force him to admit that a good half of his campaign is built on quoting Obama out of context.

Though it would be fair to say that this tight handling applies to most politicians.

We’ve already made a trillion dollars’ worth of cuts. We can make some more cuts in programs that don’t work, and make government work more efficiently…We can make another trillion or trillion-two, and what we then do is ask for the wealthy to pay a little bit more …

There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me, because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something – there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.

Well, there's the context. Now tell me that Obama does not believe that government is more responsible for your business's success than you were. You are just doing what the fine list of government's assets, including teachers, the internet, "American system", and roads and bridges, enabled you to do. This has been the centerpiece of Romney's recent campaign commercials and for good reason.

Again, he never said the government was "more responsible" for your success than you were. He was simply pointing out that it ALSO plays an important role, that individual initiative does not happen in a vacuum. I really don't get how there can still be confusion over this.


At this point conservatives simply don't trust Obama when it comes to the economy due to choices he has made (like the GM bailout). They see him as a socialist and "you didn't build that" symbolizes that belief. The actual context of the phrase is irrelevant at this point.

It also symbolizes the belief that literally anything the government does is wrong and as one republican so eloquently put it 'I want government to be small enough to drown it in my bathtub'. The phrase has now become hollow to a point where depending on the government to help you out in life is completely unacceptable, but just living off your parents trustfund is justified. And the instances where government has helped individuals out get conveniently ignored.

See Ann Romney's comments about how hard she and Mitt had it when they were students. Their dining table was a fold out ironing board and they had to sell stock to make it through it. Genuinely believing that they had it 'rough' is probably the funniest thing to come out of this convention so far.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
August 30 2012 16:23 GMT
#7235
On August 31 2012 01:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 16:56 kwizach wrote:
On August 30 2012 15:53 Danglars wrote:
On August 30 2012 14:01 ticklishmusic wrote:
It's a shame that Romney's media appearances are so tightly regulated that no one has been able to force him to admit that a good half of his campaign is built on quoting Obama out of context.

Though it would be fair to say that this tight handling applies to most politicians.

We’ve already made a trillion dollars’ worth of cuts. We can make some more cuts in programs that don’t work, and make government work more efficiently…We can make another trillion or trillion-two, and what we then do is ask for the wealthy to pay a little bit more …

There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me, because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something – there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.

Well, there's the context. Now tell me that Obama does not believe that government is more responsible for your business's success than you were. You are just doing what the fine list of government's assets, including teachers, the internet, "American system", and roads and bridges, enabled you to do. This has been the centerpiece of Romney's recent campaign commercials and for good reason.

Again, he never said the government was "more responsible" for your success than you were. He was simply pointing out that it ALSO plays an important role, that individual initiative does not happen in a vacuum. I really don't get how there can still be confusion over this.


At this point conservatives simply don't trust Obama when it comes to the economy due to choices he has made (like the GM bailout). They see him as a socialist and "you didn't build that" symbolizes that belief. The actual context of the phrase is irrelevant at this point.

The quote was deliberately taken out of context by the Romney campaign and others to capitalize on it politically.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
August 30 2012 16:24 GMT
#7236
On August 31 2012 01:19 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2012 01:14 coverpunch wrote:
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

The problem is that "fact checking" makes it sound objective. But it's not. Fact checking articles are editorials where the writer is judge, jury, and executioner of whether a statement is "factual". They're opinions.

I think they're a good part of a vibrant discussion, mind you. I just don't like the name because it's misleading.

Politifact peddles all sorts of bullshit under the guise of "fact checking."

No, you disagree with politifact because of your partisan, fact-proof, stance.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Mortal
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
2943 Posts
August 30 2012 16:31 GMT
#7237
On August 30 2012 21:58 paralleluniverse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

"We're not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact-checkers" -Romney campaign.

Source: huffingtonpost/


Ah the HuffPo, always a solid source of hilarity and mind-bogglingly stupid statements.
The universe created an audience for itself.
TrickyGilligan
Profile Joined September 2010
United States641 Posts
August 30 2012 16:31 GMT
#7238
On August 31 2012 01:14 coverpunch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 30 2012 21:21 Agathon wrote:
I read on a french newspaper (Le Monde) that republicans are blaming US' newspapers and website for "fact-checking" (Bloomberg, Slate, New York Times, Washington Post, New York Daily Mag, Talking Points Memo, The New Republic, Salon, Fox News, Politifact).

What's their arguments for blaming objective verifying of facts? I don't get how they can justify that's something bad...

The problem is that "fact checking" makes it sound objective. But it's not. Fact checking articles are editorials where the writer is judge, jury, and executioner of whether a statement is "factual". They're opinions.

I think they're a good part of a vibrant discussion, mind you. I just don't like the name because it's misleading.


This is a real problem I have with media and politics in the US right now. It's sort of the Wikipedia effect. No one is sure what is true and what isn't, because you can go online and find sources to back up any insane argument you want to make. Perhaps not credible sources, but that doesn't seem to matter to people.

Facts are not opinions. It's possible to have different opinions about facts, but there is something called "truth." Yet somehow, we've convinced ourselves that it's all opinion, and everyone's opinion is valid. I can't believe that. Some opinions are based on real things happening in the world. Lots of other opinions are based on misinformation, and whatever the speaker thinks you want to hear.

Not all opinions are created equal.
"I've had a perfectly wonderful evening. But this wasn't it." -Groucho Marx
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18857 Posts
August 30 2012 16:31 GMT
#7239
On August 31 2012 01:23 Derez wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2012 01:15 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
On August 30 2012 16:56 kwizach wrote:
On August 30 2012 15:53 Danglars wrote:
On August 30 2012 14:01 ticklishmusic wrote:
It's a shame that Romney's media appearances are so tightly regulated that no one has been able to force him to admit that a good half of his campaign is built on quoting Obama out of context.

Though it would be fair to say that this tight handling applies to most politicians.

We’ve already made a trillion dollars’ worth of cuts. We can make some more cuts in programs that don’t work, and make government work more efficiently…We can make another trillion or trillion-two, and what we then do is ask for the wealthy to pay a little bit more …

There are a lot of wealthy, successful Americans who agree with me, because they want to give something back. They know they didn’t -look, if you’ve been successful, you didn’t get there on your own. You didn’t get there on your own. I’m always struck by people who think, well, it must be because I was just so smart. There are a lot of smart people out there. It must be because I worked harder than everybody else. Let me tell you something – there are a whole bunch of hardworking people out there.

If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.

Well, there's the context. Now tell me that Obama does not believe that government is more responsible for your business's success than you were. You are just doing what the fine list of government's assets, including teachers, the internet, "American system", and roads and bridges, enabled you to do. This has been the centerpiece of Romney's recent campaign commercials and for good reason.

Again, he never said the government was "more responsible" for your success than you were. He was simply pointing out that it ALSO plays an important role, that individual initiative does not happen in a vacuum. I really don't get how there can still be confusion over this.


At this point conservatives simply don't trust Obama when it comes to the economy due to choices he has made (like the GM bailout). They see him as a socialist and "you didn't build that" symbolizes that belief. The actual context of the phrase is irrelevant at this point.

It also symbolizes the belief that literally anything the government does is wrong and as one republican so eloquently put it 'I want government to be small enough to drown it in my bathtub'. The phrase has now become hollow to a point where depending on the government to help you out in life is completely unacceptable, but just living off your parents trustfund is justified. And the instances where government has helped individuals out get conveniently ignored.

See Ann Romney's comments about how hard she and Mitt had it when they were students. Their dining table was a fold out ironing board and they had to sell stock to make it through it. Genuinely believing that they had it 'rough' is probably the funniest thing to come out of this convention so far.

As a Democrat watching the convention, this little tale of trust fund baby struggle has definitely been my favorite part, as it does a good job of illustrating just how out of touch certain people are in the United States when it comes to financial struggle. I'm reminded of frat boys I knew while going to OSU who thought their having to make their own meals was a huge burden while they described their weekend travels to the Bahamas. Eating Ramen Noodles does not a life of struggle make.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
August 30 2012 16:38 GMT
#7240
No, you disagree with politifact because of your partisan, fact-proof, stance.


Fact checkers write opinion pieces under the guise of checking accuracy, they're worthless. They've been criticized by both Democrats and Republicans because they're full of shit.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
Prev 1 360 361 362 363 364 1504 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
#7
IntoTheiNu 1363
WardiTV703
RotterdaM541
TKL 248
SteadfastSC120
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 541
TKL 248
Rex 153
SteadfastSC 120
herO (SOOP) 54
sc2solar 32
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 80426
Calm 7852
Bisu 2498
Sea 1902
Horang2 1386
EffOrt 1107
firebathero 667
Mini 577
Soma 409
Larva 283
[ Show more ]
ZerO 211
Hyuk 189
hero 181
Rush 162
Zeus 116
ggaemo 98
Last 83
Aegong 79
Pusan 66
Sharp 64
Mind 59
ToSsGirL 56
Sexy 37
sorry 24
Rock 22
soO 22
Bale 19
Terrorterran 13
JulyZerg 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
IntoTheRainbow 11
Dota 2
Gorgc7413
qojqva1657
syndereN195
monkeys_forever124
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2412
byalli512
kRYSTAL_44
Other Games
singsing1972
B2W.Neo896
Beastyqt869
hiko677
Lowko313
Hui .267
XaKoH 129
Mew2King105
KnowMe100
QueenE97
elazer64
CosmosSc2 52
Livibee24
ZerO(Twitch)19
Liquid`RaSZi0
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 7
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 25
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6998
• Jankos2197
Other Games
• WagamamaTV319
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
9h 17m
The PondCast
19h 17m
OSC
19h 17m
Replay Cast
1d 9h
RSL Revival
1d 19h
OSC
1d 22h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL
3 days
GSL
3 days
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
[ Show More ]
BSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
GSL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-05-12
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W7
YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026: Closed Qualifier
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.