• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:55
CEST 22:55
KST 05:55
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic2Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32666 users

President Obama Re-Elected - Page 1495

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1504 Next
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here.

The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301
acker
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2958 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-18 20:45:31
November 18 2012 20:43 GMT
#29881
On November 19 2012 05:39 farvacola wrote:
Hardly, I'm more referring to an analysis of winning issue structure, an analysis that indicates a drive towards the center, regardless of political affiliation. And I don't see how pointing out the failure of previously more libertarian issues indicates any sort of selection bias on my part; I am not discounting the presence of moderate libertarians, I am merely speaking on the problem of nebulousness as it pertains to estimating libertarian favor amongst the populace in regards to interpreting election results.

Edit: Social choice is not the discrete domain of libertarianism, that is my entire point.

Of course social choice isn't the discrete domain of libertarianism, social choice is the domain of both liberals and libertarians by definition. According to the two-scale axis of political ideology, at least.

It's not a reliable estimator, but it's still a decent sign that libertarians matter, as neither banned same sex marriage or banned marijuana fall under "small government". Even regulated substance use is smaller government than complete bans.
Leporello
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2845 Posts
November 18 2012 21:46 GMT
#29882
On November 19 2012 04:38 farvacola wrote:
Yes, please conservatives, resist the push towards the center, please do. This act of pretending that Reagan-Era conservatism still holds water amongst the national electorate will make 2016 oh so much easier for Democrats. Fortunately for the GOP, a lot of the visible Republican leadership post election has made it clear that they acknowledge the shift in demographics, unlike what y'all are offering up, and if this notion wins out the GOP has a much better chance in the coming elections.


The real problem is the GOP leadership isn't in the elected reps, it's in Fox News and Rush Limbaugh. The right-wing media, which started with radio, has become a very large industry from which the right-wing electorate has formulated so much of its ideas and rhetoric. It can not be underestimated, and the leaders of the GOP are very beholden to it.

This all started with the Reagan-era. The policies they've been promoting have been consistently conservative and unflexible.

Boehner and whatever political leadership the right-wing turns to has to somehow get this right-wing entertainment complex to shift with the changes they make. I'm just not sure how that's possible. They've built a brand out of pure, unrelenting "trickle-down" economics, and you're basically asking them to change their brand.

I have no doubt there are Republican leaders that want to turn more to the center. But as long as you have that Rush Limbaugh element in the GOP - which is not going away anytime soon - you're more likely to split the GOP in two than make any sudden philosophical changes.

Not that I mind that happening. My hope and dream is that the GOP will actually become an ineffectual party, to the point that something else entirely will take its place. A whole new name, which maybe even takes some of the centrist Democrats with it. Then the right-wing thinkers of America can fully shed itself of this stench they've accumulated over the past 3 decades and abandon their pure ideology for practical alternatives to Democrat governance.
Big water
paralleluniverse
Profile Joined July 2010
4065 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-18 21:58:27
November 18 2012 21:58 GMT
#29883
On November 19 2012 01:24 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 18 2012 02:54 Probe1 wrote:
On November 18 2012 00:21 kafkaesque wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


Could this possibly be real?

Your president is such a cool dude...

It's real, it came up on my facebook an hour ago+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]


I think that's why Republicans don't understand. The young vote doesn't always agree with is policies but President Obama acts like a fucking human being instead of a political robot.

actually he talks in a monotone, never changes pitch or cadence, and falls on his face without a teleprompter... tbh, he's one of the worst public speakers in politics right now (major figure).

but the media says he's cool and Beyonce invited him to a party so I guess he's cool. personally, I think jobs and opportunity are cool, but I guess I'm just the turd in the punchbowl here...

edit: stupid me, why should I care about runaway debt when the President "gets me"?

Great reason to vote for Romney, since he'll blow up the "runaway debt" with $5T of tax cuts and $2T of military spending, which he refused to specify how he'll pay for.
sam!zdat
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States5559 Posts
November 18 2012 22:02 GMT
#29884
quiet PU... gop is the party of small government and fiscal conservatism!!! They will make the debt go away because of busyness.
shikata ga nai
McBengt
Profile Joined May 2011
Sweden1684 Posts
November 18 2012 22:39 GMT
#29885
On November 19 2012 07:02 sam!zdat wrote:
quiet PU... gop is the party of small government and fiscal conservatism!!! They will make the debt go away because of busyness.


Massive tax cuts on the part of the population who still retain their spending capacity is a sure-fire way to reduce deficits, apparently.

Maybe you can build schools and hospitals and roads with libertarian magic dust?
"My twelve year old will out-reason Bill Maher when it comes to understanding, you know, what, uh, how to logic work" - Rick Santorum
BlueBird.
Profile Joined August 2008
United States3889 Posts
November 18 2012 22:48 GMT
#29886
On November 19 2012 07:39 McBengt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 07:02 sam!zdat wrote:
quiet PU... gop is the party of small government and fiscal conservatism!!! They will make the debt go away because of busyness.


Massive tax cuts on the part of the population who still retain their spending capacity is a sure-fire way to reduce deficits, apparently.

Maybe you can build schools and hospitals and roads with libertarian magic dust?


The free market will take care of that crap
Currently Playing: Android Netrunner, Gwent, Gloomhaven, Board Games
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
November 18 2012 23:35 GMT
#29887
Every time you read someone extolling the dynamism of the modern economy, the virtues of risk-taking, declaring that everyone has to expect to have multiple jobs in his or her life and that you can never stop learning, etc,, etc., bear in mind that this is a portrait of an economy with no stability, no guarantees that hard work will provide a consistent living, and a constant possibility of being thrown aside simply because you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

And nothing people can do in their personal lives or behavior can change this. Your church and your traditional marriage won’t guarantee the value of your 401(k), or make insurance affordable on the individual market.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/the-insecurity-election/

I don't normally quote Krugman, or pay much attention to his more political statements, but I think he hits the nail on the head in describing the general feelings on the economy for a great number of Americans.
kmillz
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1548 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 00:44:16
November 19 2012 00:40 GMT
#29888
On November 19 2012 05:43 acker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 05:39 farvacola wrote:
Hardly, I'm more referring to an analysis of winning issue structure, an analysis that indicates a drive towards the center, regardless of political affiliation. And I don't see how pointing out the failure of previously more libertarian issues indicates any sort of selection bias on my part; I am not discounting the presence of moderate libertarians, I am merely speaking on the problem of nebulousness as it pertains to estimating libertarian favor amongst the populace in regards to interpreting election results.

Edit: Social choice is not the discrete domain of libertarianism, that is my entire point.

Of course social choice isn't the discrete domain of libertarianism, social choice is the domain of both liberals and libertarians by definition. According to the two-scale axis of political ideology, at least.

It's not a reliable estimator, but it's still a decent sign that libertarians matter, as neither banned same sex marriage or banned marijuana fall under "small government". Even regulated substance use is smaller government than complete bans.


To go back to something mentioned earlier in this discussion, I tend to agree that the low voter turn-out would surely be a win for independents (including libertarians), even though Gary Johnson didn't get many votes. Many people saw it completely pointless (like myself) to vote for any of the candidates, because I already knew that either Romney or Obama would win and I didn't care for either. I don't remember the exact number, but I think something close to 10 million less people voted than last election. It's true that this doesn't mean "omg 10 million libertarians" but it certainly supports the argument that more people are against the Republican and Democratic parties, therefore there are more opportunities for libertarians in the future to capture those voters. I honestly wanted to vote for Romney to get Obama out, as I saw him as the "lesser of 2 evils", but I didn't want it on my conscience to vote for somebody else who I still viewed as "evil".
sc2superfan101
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
3583 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 01:02:10
November 19 2012 01:01 GMT
#29889
On November 19 2012 04:45 acker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Stopped reading right there. Went to BLS for latest local unemployment data (2011).

http://www.bls.gov/lau/table14full11.pdf

35.2% unemployment rate for age 16-19, 17.6% for ages 20-24.

Are you using some alternate definition of "unemployment" that I'm not privy to? Please tell me you're not doing "100 minus employment" to calculate the unemployment rate ><

On a completely unrelated note that bears no insight into the state of the GOP at large, is this a "facts" problem, or a "messaging" problem?

35.2% is pretty fucking close to 50%.

oh and I forgot that if you're unemployed for a long time you suddenly stop being unemployed. it's great how reality works, isn't it?

User was warned for this post
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
sc2superfan101
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
3583 Posts
November 19 2012 01:04 GMT
#29890
On November 19 2012 08:35 aksfjh wrote:
Show nested quote +
Every time you read someone extolling the dynamism of the modern economy, the virtues of risk-taking, declaring that everyone has to expect to have multiple jobs in his or her life and that you can never stop learning, etc,, etc., bear in mind that this is a portrait of an economy with no stability, no guarantees that hard work will provide a consistent living, and a constant possibility of being thrown aside simply because you happen to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

And nothing people can do in their personal lives or behavior can change this. Your church and your traditional marriage won’t guarantee the value of your 401(k), or make insurance affordable on the individual market.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/18/the-insecurity-election/

I don't normally quote Krugman, or pay much attention to his more political statements, but I think he hits the nail on the head in describing the general feelings on the economy for a great number of Americans.

uh, lol?

that was one of the dumbest things I have ever read, and I am so not surprised that Krugman is the guy who said it. first he says that the problem with a dynamic free-market is that it's dynamic... and then he tops the sundae with this cherry:

And nothing people can do in their personal lives or behavior can change this.


oh yeah, Krugers, there's nothing you can do. NOTHING! all those millions of people who have done things about it? all imaginary.
My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 01:08:37
November 19 2012 01:06 GMT
#29891
On November 19 2012 10:01 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 04:45 acker wrote:
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Stopped reading right there. Went to BLS for latest local unemployment data (2011).

http://www.bls.gov/lau/table14full11.pdf

35.2% unemployment rate for age 16-19, 17.6% for ages 20-24.

Are you using some alternate definition of "unemployment" that I'm not privy to? Please tell me you're not doing "100 minus employment" to calculate the unemployment rate ><

On a completely unrelated note that bears no insight into the state of the GOP at large, is this a "facts" problem, or a "messaging" problem?

35.2% is pretty fucking close to 50%.

Is that what your gut tells you?

On November 19 2012 10:01 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
And nothing people can do in their personal lives or behavior can change this.


oh yeah, Krugers, there's nothing you can do. NOTHING! all those millions of people who have done things about it? all imaginary.

If that's your "rebuttal" to his sentence, I think you understood neither the sentence nor the article.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
HunterX11
Profile Joined March 2009
United States1048 Posts
November 19 2012 01:07 GMT
#29892
On November 19 2012 10:04 sc2superfan101 wrote:
oh yeah, Krugers, there's nothing you can do. NOTHING! all those millions of people who have done things about it? all imaginary.


He isn't saying there is nothing that people can do to mitigate the effects of these problems, just that they cannot do anything about the problems themselves. The average person is not a multi-billionaire, and even multi-billionaires can have difficulty influencing markets, and yet you are saying that "millions of people" can influence the value of their 401(k), for example?
Try using both Irradiate and Defensive Matrix on an Overlord. It looks pretty neat.
ZeaL.
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States5955 Posts
November 19 2012 01:16 GMT
#29893
On November 19 2012 10:01 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 04:45 acker wrote:
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Stopped reading right there. Went to BLS for latest local unemployment data (2011).

http://www.bls.gov/lau/table14full11.pdf

35.2% unemployment rate for age 16-19, 17.6% for ages 20-24.

Are you using some alternate definition of "unemployment" that I'm not privy to? Please tell me you're not doing "100 minus employment" to calculate the unemployment rate ><

On a completely unrelated note that bears no insight into the state of the GOP at large, is this a "facts" problem, or a "messaging" problem?

35.2% is pretty fucking close to 50%.

oh and I forgot that if you're unemployed for a long time you suddenly stop being unemployed. it's great how reality works, isn't it?


:|
35% = 50%. only off by a factor close to 10



On November 19 2012 10:04 sc2superfan101 wrote:

Show nested quote +
And nothing people can do in their personal lives or behavior can change this.


oh yeah, Krugers, there's nothing you can do. NOTHING! all those millions of people who have done things about it? all imaginary.


Way to miss the point. Unless you're an executive you can't do shit about what happens to your company or what happens to the stock market. Unless your suggestion is that we all start our own businesses or something...
acker
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2958 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 01:25:36
November 19 2012 01:23 GMT
#29894
On November 19 2012 10:01 sc2superfan101 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 04:45 acker wrote:
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Stopped reading right there. Went to BLS for latest local unemployment data (2011).

http://www.bls.gov/lau/table14full11.pdf

35.2% unemployment rate for age 16-19, 17.6% for ages 20-24.

Are you using some alternate definition of "unemployment" that I'm not privy to? Please tell me you're not doing "100 minus employment" to calculate the unemployment rate ><

On a completely unrelated note that bears no insight into the state of the GOP at large, is this a "facts" problem, or a "messaging" problem?

35.2% is pretty fucking close to 50%.


True, 35 is only around 40% off of 50.

I wish I could think with my gut like that. Have to use math instead. Much easier to get wrong than gut.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
November 19 2012 01:26 GMT
#29895
yea but more of the same wage suppression, finance liberalisation policies isn't going to create youth employment. should be obvious
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
HeavenS
Profile Joined August 2004
Colombia2259 Posts
November 19 2012 01:26 GMT
#29896


maybe anonymous won us ohio? haha idk if this is true but if they helped stop election rigging then <3
Im cooler than the other side of the pillow.
kmillz
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1548 Posts
November 19 2012 01:29 GMT
#29897
On November 19 2012 10:23 acker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 10:01 sc2superfan101 wrote:
On November 19 2012 04:45 acker wrote:
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Stopped reading right there. Went to BLS for latest local unemployment data (2011).

http://www.bls.gov/lau/table14full11.pdf

35.2% unemployment rate for age 16-19, 17.6% for ages 20-24.

Are you using some alternate definition of "unemployment" that I'm not privy to? Please tell me you're not doing "100 minus employment" to calculate the unemployment rate ><

On a completely unrelated note that bears no insight into the state of the GOP at large, is this a "facts" problem, or a "messaging" problem?

35.2% is pretty fucking close to 50%.


True, 35 is only around 40% off of 50.

I wish I could think with my gut like that. Have to use math instead. Much easier to get wrong than gut.


It's still significantly higher unemployment than Texas' youth, just sayin..but it is much easier to attack someone's skewed math than actually address his point, isn't it?
acker
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2958 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 01:31:44
November 19 2012 01:31 GMT
#29898
On November 19 2012 10:29 kmillz wrote:
It's still significantly higher unemployment than Texas' youth, just sayin..but it is much easier to attack someone's skewed math than actually address his point, isn't it?

On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.


Is there something I'm missing here?
kmillz
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1548 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-11-19 01:38:49
November 19 2012 01:36 GMT
#29899
On November 19 2012 10:31 acker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 10:29 kmillz wrote:
It's still significantly higher unemployment than Texas' youth, just sayin..but it is much easier to attack someone's skewed math than actually address his point, isn't it?

Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.


Is there something I'm missing here?


That the unemployment of California's youth is still atrocious? Here, I'll even give you a liberally biased source to support this claim.
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
November 19 2012 01:36 GMT
#29900
On November 19 2012 10:29 kmillz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 19 2012 10:23 acker wrote:
On November 19 2012 10:01 sc2superfan101 wrote:
On November 19 2012 04:45 acker wrote:
On November 19 2012 02:05 sc2superfan101 wrote:
I get that our rhetoric has gotten stale, and I get that constantly crying wolf doesn't help, but it's hard to refrain from being a bit hyperbolic when half of what you say isn't hyperbolic at all. people think I'm exaggerating when I say youth unemployment in California is close to 50%, but it's actually true.

Stopped reading right there. Went to BLS for latest local unemployment data (2011).

http://www.bls.gov/lau/table14full11.pdf

35.2% unemployment rate for age 16-19, 17.6% for ages 20-24.

Are you using some alternate definition of "unemployment" that I'm not privy to? Please tell me you're not doing "100 minus employment" to calculate the unemployment rate ><

On a completely unrelated note that bears no insight into the state of the GOP at large, is this a "facts" problem, or a "messaging" problem?

35.2% is pretty fucking close to 50%.


True, 35 is only around 40% off of 50.

I wish I could think with my gut like that. Have to use math instead. Much easier to get wrong than gut.


It's still significantly higher unemployment than Texas' youth, just sayin..but it is much easier to attack someone's skewed math than actually address his point, isn't it?

California's youth employment has always been shitty it has more to do with california's economy then the national economy.
Prev 1 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1504 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 6m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 690
IndyStarCraft 246
ZombieGrub152
UpATreeSC 124
ForJumy 73
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 4403
Calm 2442
Rain 1333
Mini 314
Dewaltoss 113
Soulkey 45
Aegong 32
TY 14
NaDa 8
Dota 2
capcasts107
NeuroSwarm45
Counter-Strike
Dendi1635
flusha526
Foxcn193
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu612
Khaldor170
Other Games
tarik_tv45941
gofns32443
summit1g4349
Grubby3630
FrodaN1155
shahzam490
mouzStarbuck199
markeloff127
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream4286
Other Games
BasetradeTV189
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 27
• davetesta25
• Reevou 3
• OhrlRock 1
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 33
• FirePhoenix8
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22143
League of Legends
• Doublelift3354
• Jankos2097
• TFBlade1688
Other Games
• imaqtpie1595
• Shiphtur354
Upcoming Events
Online Event
3h 6m
Replay Cast
5h 6m
GSL Code S
12h 36m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
13h 6m
Replay Cast
1d 3h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 14h
OSC
1d 16h
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.