| Forum Index > General Forum |
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here. The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301 | ||
|
ControlMonkey
Australia3109 Posts
On November 02 2012 04:33 sam!zdat wrote: nah, dude, jesus came and absolved us of our responsibility to give a fuck about anything but ourselves I'm pretty sure Jesus said that GDP growth should never be below 3% | ||
|
TheRealPaciFist
United States1049 Posts
On November 02 2012 04:04 farvacola wrote: Quit being a faggot, and suck that dick. Don't be a c**t f****t n****r deer -- On topic: http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/tue-october-9-2012-ben-affleck | ||
|
Zaqwert
United States411 Posts
Feel free to post whatever wikipedia articles and little charts and graphs you want. In 50 years when you are an old man and the earth hasn't turned into a toxic wasteland try to remember this thread. | ||
|
Zaqwert
United States411 Posts
I assure everyone that the country will be almost identical in 4 years, regardless of whether Romney wins or Obama wins. | ||
|
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:44 Zaqwert wrote: I assure everyone that the country will be almost identical in 4 years, regardless of whether Romney wins or Obama wins. Yes, that's why I want to emigrate. On November 02 2012 05:41 ControlMonkey wrote: I'm pretty sure Jesus said that GDP growth should never be below 3% lol | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:42 Zaqwert wrote: Man made climate change is a joke and anyone who believes in it is a fool, it's nothing more than a fake crisis designed for governments to increase regulation, taxes, and power, that's why left wingers and socialists scream so much about it. Feel free to post whatever wikipedia articles and little charts and graphs you want. In 50 years when you are an old man and the earth hasn't turned into a toxic wasteland try to remember this thread. And your proof that this is all fake is? | ||
|
Leporello
United States2845 Posts
| ||
|
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:47 farvacola wrote: And your proof that this is all fake is? it's obvious. leftists obviously want to increase regulations just, you know, because, and there's absolutely no financial incentive on the part of the powers-that-be to totally ignore anthropogenic climate change. | ||
|
Zaqwert
United States411 Posts
On November 02 2012 03:35 jalstar wrote: Romney winning would definitely be Dewey vs Truman part 2, except that it wouldn't be a statement of the untrustworthiness of polls, but also of poll aggregators and prediction markets. Essentially, it would be a statement that elections are quantitatively unpredictable. Sure Karl Rove, Fox News, etc. have qualitatively predicted Romney to win, but that's not really what I'm talking about here. I think Obama will win, but if Romney does win, and by the margins some Republican pundits are predicting, it will say a lot about the polls. The right wing pundits try to claim it's because of intentional bias, but I've read a lot of theories about why the polling might unintetionally skew Democrat (not as part of a conspiracy, just due to random factors). | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:49 sam!zdat wrote: it's obvious. leftists obviously want to increase regulations just, you know, because, and there's absolutely no financial incentive on the part of the powers-that-be to totally ignore anthropogenic climate change. "Qui Bono"? More like "Qui Homo"! | ||
|
Lmui
Canada6223 Posts
http://www.nature.com/search/executeSearch?sp-c=25&retainProductFacets=true&sp-advanced=true&pag-end=1&sp-q=global warming&sp-q-9[NATURE]=1&sp-s= 14,000 hits, climate change will return a good fraction of that. The vast majority of the ariticles treat global warming as fact since proof that it's happening is so easily obtained. | ||
|
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
cui, farv. cui. you need the dative  | ||
|
Zaqwert
United States411 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:47 farvacola wrote: And your proof that this is all fake is? I don't have to prove it's fake, you never have to prove a negative. Global warming cultists are making a HUGE f'ing claim, not only that human activity is causing dramatic change to the earth's envionment and climate, but that those changes are going to be catostrophic in nature, to the point we need to drastically alter every aspet of our lives to combat them. To say the jury is still out on that is being generous. There have been some data points indicating rising global temperatures, but connecting that to CO2 emissions is still iffy, and in fact the earth's tempature has begun going back down slightly, yet CO2 emissions are higher than ever. The government needs scare tactics to gain power typically, be it the "terrorists" or global warming or some other imaginary threat. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
God must be a commie. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18869 Posts
Be gone with you, Latin speaking swine! | ||
|
sam!zdat
United States5559 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:54 Zaqwert wrote: The government needs scare tactics to gain power typically, be it the "terrorists" or global warming or some other imaginary threat. Ah, so how do you feel about your boy Romney and the military-industrial complex then? | ||
|
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:54 Zaqwert wrote: I don't have to prove it's fake, you never have to prove a negative. Global warming cultists are making a HUGE f'ing claim, not only that human activity is causing dramatic change to the earth's envionment and climate, but that those changes are going to be catostrophic in nature, to the point we need to drastically alter every aspet of our lives to combat them. To say the jury is still out on that is being generous. There have been some data points indicating rising global temperatures, but connecting that to CO2 emissions is still iffy, and in fact the earth's tempature has begun going back down slightly, yet CO2 emissions are higher than ever. The government needs scare tactics to gain power typically, be it the "terrorists" or global warming or some other imaginary threat. If you look at temperature trends over the past 100 years they trend upwards but if you look at each data point they tend to go up and down with the ups being higher and the lows not being quite as low. We have always had cyclical temperatures its just that its trending upwards. | ||
|
Zaqwert
United States411 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:55 sam!zdat wrote: Ah, so how do you feel about your boy Romney and the military-industrial complex then? Romney ain't my boy, he's an empty suit just trying to get elected. At least I realize this and didn't believe in all this Hopey McChange crap people bought about Obama back in '08. Obama looks poised to win agian, but at least people have wised up to the fact he's not some sort of half-black Messiah that will deliver us to the promise land, but a standard run of the mill politician. | ||
|
Leporello
United States2845 Posts
On November 02 2012 05:54 Zaqwert wrote: I don't have to prove it's fake, you never have to prove a negative. Global warming cultists are making a HUGE f'ing claim, not only that human activity is causing dramatic change to the earth's envionment and climate, but that those changes are going to be catostrophic in nature, to the point we need to drastically alter every aspet of our lives to combat them. To say the jury is still out on that is being generous. There have been some data points indicating rising global temperatures, but connecting that to CO2 emissions is still iffy, and in fact the earth's tempature has begun going back down slightly, yet CO2 emissions are higher than ever. The government needs scare tactics to gain power typically, be it the "terrorists" or global warming or some other imaginary threat. How the hell does anyone assume that when it comes to influencing the public through media, scientists would be able to outdo the oil industry, to pull off such a "conspiracy" against the world's most wealthiest industry? I mean, that is impressive. The fact that climate change is becoming more accepted is a victory of our intellectual honesty over the business of media. Despite all the often-paid-for "contrary" opinions on the subject, people are accepting that science has been so successful over the years because they're in the business of openly, publicly scrutinizing themselves better than anyone in the media can. They know what facts are, and they know how to work with them. The way you post, on the other hand, suggests the opposite. | ||
| ||
|
|
FEL
Patches Events
AI Arena Tournament
FEL
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
IntoTheTV X SOOP
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
