EPTI love bacon. I'll eat it while I'm on my death bed.
Bacon = Death? per Harvard - Page 14
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
gulati
United States2241 Posts
I love bacon. I'll eat it while I'm on my death bed. | ||
|
spacemonkeyy
Australia477 Posts
On March 14 2012 11:57 Chargelot wrote: Um. Okay. Eating a bullet wouldn't clog up my arteries either, doesn't make it healthy. If you don't like that comparison, I challenge you to eat a pound of lard per week for the next year. I'll pay for your funeral. Just saying that if you understood the metabolism of fats and carbs that you will see that a lot of the bad stuff about fat is malligned. Demonized based on the fat hypothesis and that everyones cholesterol should be minimised by avoiding fat. I'm not saying eat the bad fats- they are obviously bad (transfats particualrly). If your running a surplus of carbs you will be doing far more damage IMO. | ||
|
Lobotomist
United States1541 Posts
On March 14 2012 03:57 ddrddrddrddr wrote: Hahahaha, definitely the first time I've heard someone demand MORE lobbyingBacon industry needs to do more lobbying. This negativity is unacceptable. | ||
|
AoN.DimSum
United States2983 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On March 14 2012 11:00 spacemonkeyy wrote: Taste is so subjective though. People get literally addicted to carbs and sugars. Once you ween yourself off them you can find plenty of great tasting food which is good for you. Berries for example personally would much rather eat a punnet of fresh raspberries over any candy and raspberries are oh so nutritious. I don't see any support for the literal clinical support for an actual addiction to carbs and sugars. I think the claim here can be likened to somebody saying they're addicted to American Idol or chocolate. It's said based on how much they like doing something when no addiction is present. | ||
|
FFGenerations
7088 Posts
| ||
|
NoobSkills
United States1603 Posts
You are going to do eventually. Attempt to cut out things that are bad for you and live life in the best possible way for you. If you happen to pass on at 35 at least you gave it a shot in the end you won't remember anything anyways, but you won't have left a stain behind. | ||
|
lorkac
United States2297 Posts
100%-X will die sad X will die happy Bacon lives in the X group. | ||
|
Kraidio
China133 Posts
No, no that's not right at all. Bacon or death! | ||
|
NoobSkills
United States1603 Posts
On March 14 2012 12:25 lorkac wrote: 100% of people will die at some point. 100%-X will die sad X will die happy Bacon lives in the X group. You do know you're not allowed to have two different meanings for a single variable right? Try Y or Z | ||
|
Sinensis
United States2513 Posts
On March 14 2012 12:33 NoobSkills wrote: You do know you're not allowed to have two different meanings for a single variable right? Try Y or Z Maybe he's talking about set theory. Also bacon doesn't kill you. Worrying about bacon killing you probably kills just as fast, if not faster than bacon. If I'm wrong someone find me the LD50 of bacon. You can't because there isn't one. | ||
|
ETisME
12698 Posts
why I have never thought of that! | ||
|
Forikorder
Canada8840 Posts
On March 14 2012 12:33 NoobSkills wrote: You do know you're not allowed to have two different meanings for a single variable right? Try Y or Z i dont see how X has 2 different meaning if 100 people will die happy then X=100 so if 100% means 10 000 then the what he said is 10 000 people will die 10 000 - 100 will die sad 100 will die happy | ||
|
scarper65
1560 Posts
| ||
|
ravenKRaz
United States580 Posts
| ||
|
RogerX
New Zealand3180 Posts
| ||
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
Also no where in the table do they show like % of meals they cook themselves, ready meals they put in the oven/micro, if they visit a dietist, amount of cigarettes they smoke, if they're in a happy relationship, if they have any mental problems like depression or anxiety and if they're on any medications. They might have, but not included it in the table, but isn't that things you'd like to point out specifically to like say "we crossed all t's and dotted all i's for this"? | ||
|
itkovian
United States1763 Posts
I thought it was common knowledge that bacon wasn't very good for you, I mean, just look at all the grease that comes out when you fry it. Also, my dad is always warning me away from red meats, so I try and stick to chicken instead in my own cooking. And fish as well if it wasn't so expensive :O | ||
|
Jugan
United States1566 Posts
"It's always the things we love that end up destroying us." | ||
|
ZeaL.
United States5955 Posts
On March 14 2012 13:25 salle wrote: I should probably read all of the replies but this whole study seems quite weird to me... why is the issue of differences in size of calories these people take in not brought up as a quite big variable in the article or explained away, for the Health Professional Follow-up study there's a difference from 1659 to 2396 kcal/d between the group that eats the least amount of red meats to the group that eats the most. the Nurses' Health Study had a similar difference with 1202 to 2030 kcal/d. I would say that THAT is a quite big difference in life style, which could also explain the increased risk of death. but they glance over it saying "In addition, a higher red meat intake was associated with a higher intake of total energy [...]" but that was it. Also no where in the table do they show the level of active life style or health conciousness people might be. Like % of meals they cook themselves, ready meals they put in the oven/micro, if they visit a dietist, amount of cigarettes they smoke, their weight, if they're in a happy relationship, if they have any mental problems like depression or anxiety and if they're on any medications. They might have, but not included it in the table, but isn't that things you'd like to point out specifically to like say "we crossed all t's and dotted all i's for this"? Those first table shows the aggregate data for each quintile to give you a sense of what the groups look like. When they do the analyses on mortality they take into account caloric intake, lifestyle etc. That's what pops up under the multivariate analysis row for the mortality tables. If you want to know the full list of what they controlled for look at the statistical analysis paragraph. | ||
| ||
