|
|
|
Damn i'm a newb got 7.211 LoL
|
haha my high was 7.0 but people on my msn list seem to average in the low 6's so i guess we just suck lol still interested if anyone can beat my friend's 4.48
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dude Impossible... 4.82
Anyone bored enough to try for a lucky break under 4 seconds?
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
well you have to go really perfect and get lucky setup of bricks to get under 4
|
3.97 2nd try. Are you guys using high mouse speed :p First try was 4.9something. 4.061 5th try...I misclicked on try 3 and 4.
it says:
You Clicked all the blocks in 3.97 seconds.
Sucka Sucka Ma Balls!
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
|
nvm good hopefully the known teamliquiders stay at the top so none of us needs to ask for proof from some nobody
|
3.875 is nice score rekrul!
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
damnit i keep missing now
|
3.868 yo!
Still says the sucka my balls message.
EDIT: Nuts now 3.962 I'm slowing down.
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
|
Valhalla18444 Posts
ok i fail
i usually get about 5.3
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
3.671
under 3 seconds here i come
or not
|
New personal record 3.829...Rekrul still in the lead though ^^
EDIT: 3.749 EDIT2: Shit. I misclick and get red but still 4.004 that woulda been a winner ^^;
|
I want to see a Race war in this. 
T - Nada P - Reach Z - July
|
Fuck ya 3.393 the numbers are blur O_o
Edit: and STILL sucka my balls message.
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
fu i wanted to stop playing it
|
I think it's still possible to improve but if you get more than .2 seconds better I may have to quit ^^;
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
i think under 3 is possible given the right block setup, some times its really easy
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
Sucka Sucka ma balls, wonder whats next
|
Yah I could see barely under 3 like 2.8 or 2.9 but that would be over 300 APM ^^;
Are you using like peripheral vision of the entire screen when you're playing too?
Slowing down...it's 2:19 AM here. Rekrul wins if he gets anything better
|
|
|
|
|
7.624
|
3.792
I'm not sure how low it could go. Below 3 is definitely possible though given a lucky draw. Rek'll probably get bored and throw the game away forever soon, and I'm already sick of it, so this definitely won't replace Starcraft.
|
5.152 with this sucky workplace mouse
|
It matters completely on the brick setup, I've gotten mid 3s with a lucky brick setup = =
|
I'm happy just to get 4.898 :O. No wonder my APM is so low.
|
It doesn't actually have a whole lot to do with hand speed. It's more of a mental challenge.
|
i think it has a lot to do with hand-eye coordination, therefore involving speed, accuracy, and concentration
|
0.475 sec suckers!!11!!six!! Nah 5.798
|
|
|
if you are under 4, think about your life for a minute
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On September 27 2005 05:23 Huone wrote:if you are under 4, think about your life for a minute 
i just thought about it for a minute
i concluded it's better than yours
|
6,843 first try. It's not all about hand speed.
|
Sweden33719 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 27 2005 05:30 Rekrul wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2005 05:23 Huone wrote:if you are under 4, think about your life for a minute  i just thought about it for a minute i concluded it's better than yours
Rekrul. Banning me for this? So I think, the statement actually truly hurt you, you don't have a life. Well, It's not my fault, don't punish me for it.
|
Korea (South)17174 Posts
On September 27 2005 06:13 Huone2 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2005 05:30 Rekrul wrote:On September 27 2005 05:23 Huone wrote:if you are under 4, think about your life for a minute  i just thought about it for a minute i concluded it's better than yours Rekrul. Banning me for this? So I think, the statement actually truly hurt you, you don't have a life. Well, It's not my fault, don't punish me for it.
actually it prompted me to look at all of your posts, which were all indeed shitty
|
Catyoul
France2377 Posts
|
|
|
4.4 something got bored, i think i tried around 10 times so i guess some nerds are faster than i am
|
|
|
This game sucks
Luck in brick setup > skills
|
Australia3818 Posts
On September 27 2005 07:34 tfeign wrote: This game sucks
Luck in brick setup > skills
Hah...said the LOSER.
|
|
|
cant break the 5 second mark, bah
|
yeah me neither, 5.622 for me
|
|
|
Australia3818 Posts
Hah...if anyone is faster than me they are obviously a no-life loser who spends all day practising this game.
|
On September 27 2005 08:04 Smurg wrote: Hah...if anyone is faster than me they are obviously a no-life loser who spends all day practising this game.
whats your time ? 8.x ? :D
|
Australia3818 Posts
On September 27 2005 08:25 chicken` wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2005 08:04 Smurg wrote: Hah...if anyone is faster than me they are obviously a no-life loser who spends all day practising this game.
whats your time ? 8.x ? :D
In general I was being a prick...since thats what most people say if someone beats them.
My time is 3.581 though.
|
On September 27 2005 02:03 Rekrul wrote: 3.751 woo lol i thought u wanted to quit.
|
GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrr the lowest i can get is 5.123 roar !
|
|
|
On September 27 2005 08:27 Smurg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2005 08:25 chicken` wrote:On September 27 2005 08:04 Smurg wrote: Hah...if anyone is faster than me they are obviously a no-life loser who spends all day practising this game.
whats your time ? 8.x ? :D In general I was being a prick...since thats what most people say if someone beats them. My time is 3.581 though.
yeah, whatever, jay chous faster
|
|
|
On September 27 2005 07:46 Smurg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2005 07:34 tfeign wrote: This game sucks
Luck in brick setup > skills Hah...said the LOSER.
WHAT?
|
|
|
Australia3818 Posts
On September 27 2005 08:42 zrucrem wrote:bow me I can hardly tell you edited that 2 in.
It's INTENSE.
|
On September 27 2005 08:55 Smurg wrote:I can hardly tell you edited that 2 in. It's INTENSE.
yea he did do a good jobO_O
|
ToT)MidiaN(
England2183 Posts
3.426 after trying constantly for about 10 minutes, had enough now
|
6 something
|
also i had MS Paint open in my screen heheheh OOPSie
|
Australia3818 Posts
Hey man, at least you use Firefox.
|
4.66 was best i got in 10 tries T_T
|
ridiculous, tried like 10-15 times, couldnt get past 5.5, average of like 7
|
you guys suck;( I cant get under 4 lame ass nerds!
4.1xxx
|
|
|
On September 27 2005 08:42 zrucrem wrote:bow me
edited right? coz "you are freak" is somewhere between five seconds, gg nore
btw me 3,7
|
4.124 is the best i got after a few tries, yeah definitly a photoshop look at the numbers.
|
|
|
Belgium6774 Posts
Getting under 3 gets you: You cheat beotch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Korea (South)11587 Posts
|
my high is 5.06 on like 3rd try
|
|
|
my past few trys, seems to be getting faster  also it helps when u have an ez setup
5.584 5.411 5.462 5.06 5.167 5.23 4.961 4.577
|
|
|
I find that it doesn't really test your mouse speed. For me the limiting factor seems to just be how fast my eyes can find the numbers.
Averaging about 5 currently. (sooo much easier when you get a good setup)
|
|
|
you still had mspaint open you fuckin idiot
|
Oh no, the time was identical too. D'oh.
|
also "Your" should be "You're".
|
hmm ok, thanks for pointing me out. You're a idiot :D?!
|
4.481 , can't play this more then 5 minutes straight
|
You Clicked all the blocks in 4.885 seconds
Dude... impossible..
|
3.321
Took me 15 min to top that high score
|
On September 27 2005 13:11 1INK wrote: you still had mspaint open you fuckin idiot
I found an idiot :D!
|
4.1xx on a touchpad 2nd try pshhhhhhhhhh
|
only break the low 4's mark half the time, need a mouse for lower i guess this isnt as hardcore as multitabling tho
|
Finally below 4 !!
3.97 yaaay :D
|
|
|
4.583 seconds
first try dont feel like doing it anymore :{
|
5.142 i'll try again later
|
|
|
4.375 ill come back lata that music break the fu*k out of ya!
|
Got like 5.2 once, but that was the second and last time I got under six. Only tried maybe 15 times though.
|
|
|
|
|
ok if anyone wants to take a shot at the record i recommend securing proof in case of disputes
http://www.fraps.com/
the above link leads you to a vod maker which you can download, as screenshots are usually not a solid evidence i suggest you just keep the video capture running as you tool around, occasionally resetting it.
|
Won't the vod program slow us down though? Camtasia does when I make vod.
|
On September 27 2005 13:48 zrucrem wrote: hmm ok, thanks for pointing me out. You're a idiot :D?! no dude, on your MSPaint job you misspelled "you're". also, in that quoted sentence, "a" should be "an" so you're still an idiot
|
On September 27 2005 18:41 nova_442 wrote: Won't the vod program slow us down though? Camtasia does when I make vod. hopefully it wont slow you down, but with the amount of effort going into these attempts i'd hate to see someone lie besides nova you dont have to make vods, after your big battle with rekrul last night your word is good
|
|
|
3.532
played this i think a year ago for like 20 minutes in school when someone posted it on gg.net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 27 2005 19:53 LetMeBeWithYou wrote: 3.001 that would set a new record did you make a vod
|
|
|
Wow, 4.356 How is it even possible to beat that :O You guys are sick.
|
3.316 ^^; I'm leaving the window open until I can get a SS but the video capture is not working well :/
EDIT: Fraps is a bastard, says my drivers are out of date.
|
|
|
|
|
4.34 Anything under for is rediculus.
|
Damn you nova, beat me by just .001 :o I'll be at it some again tommorow
|
Not even .01, but .001. One thousandth of one second. Nice effort pumpkin!
|
Well in that case..... I view it as we're tied :o
|
6.012, after like 10th time, and im doen now!
|
4.5 best 4 me^^
|
|
|
Took another 5 minute whack at it and came up with 3.233. This game's addicting.
|
5.374 4.998 4.483 4.734 4.609 4.813 4.249 4.424 4.608 4.807 4.733 4.124 4.486 4.123 4.55 4.309 4.439 .... 4 4.248 4.184 ...
3.623
FINALLY !!! ( half an hour )
|
|
|
6.016 seconds
I'm "wacked" :D
|
|
|
2.988
It says:
You Clicked all the blocks in 2.988 seconds You Cheating BEOTCH!!
Didn't video it, but the next person who gets under 3 can verify what it says.
|
So there's no video or ss and the message is the same as someone here at TL already said? I think the creator is gonna want more of a showing of proof although I'm not him.
We do have a new record holder though at 3.2 something
|
|
|
i think the only true evidence is video proof, at the very least a screenshot.. unless we know your word is good from previous experiences
|
omg, just took another crack at it and on my 3rd try came so close to being in the 2 second range =[
EDIT* Just got 3.058, not going to bother spamming another SS though until i'm below 3
|
lol damn, yo pumpkin do ya think you could record these attempts on vod ? even if we trust ya it'd still be really dope to see these scores in action for us slower dudes =P
|
Sure, i'll try to get the program working tommorow if i have time. With that said, i've broken 3 ! Props to the other guy with 2.988, he wasn't lying about the " You cheat beotch!!!! ". 2.899
|
I recorded a 2.947 and a 3.016 on video. Fraps wasn't working for me, so used camtasia. Someone know a place I can upload them?
|
If you compress them you can put them on usendit or various other sites.
|
What's the message for 2.x? Is it really you cheat beotch?
|
pole check your pms... we want those vods =) they'll be fun for the slower people to watch
|
|
|
|
|
|