|
To keep this thread open for discussion, please READ THIS BEFORE POSTING:The following types of posts are banworthy: - Nation bashing. - Significantly disrespectful posts toward any of the parties involved. Please familiarize yourself with some of the basics on the use of force in the United States before posting in this thread. If you feel the need to post a reaction to the news, post a comment on the youtube video. Don't bring it here. This thread is for a discussion on the topic, and your post better have substance to it. Low content posts will be met with moderator action. Here is a good post by someone with experience in escalation of force training. Read that too. This post might change your opinion of in the incident. |
On January 25 2012 05:16 Caryc wrote: why not shoot him in his fucking legs? wtf..
You can bleed-out just as easily with being shot in the legs. Obviously not as quickly as with being shot in the chest, but yeah, there was no reason to even shoot him to begin with. They had dogs with them as well as tasers and pepper spray.
It's just Police officers power-tripping.
|
Fuck they killed Gordon Freeman.
|
On January 25 2012 05:17 tapk69 wrote: This is real? only in america , he shot 5 shots and then 4 more to kill the guy , not to take his weapon down ( hammer !? ).. completely unjustified , he could have shoot 2 bullets or so in the legs , not 9 , he even had a dog with him to get the guys arm..
I watched lots of seasons of COPS , i love it , cops on it usually are nice guys ( at least on camera ) but this is plain wrong . Taser works if it reaches the skin always , even on PCP...
Well, the guy was wearing heavy clothing.
|
At :44 seconds it really seems like the guy with the crowbar (? looks more like a small sledge hammer to me) is about to smash in the other cops head. I sadly think that the force was justified in this case, the suspect clearly wasn't processing things very well and was acting very dangerously. By :46 it is obvious that the suspect was just posturing, but firing has already begun. Why would you even pretend to attack an armed man? I don't see how anyone can blame the cops in this situation. They actually seem to be doing their job in very difficult circumstances.
|
Standard Operating Procedure in my opinion. A crowbar is an extremely deadly weapon, everyone who played Half life knows this. I see nothing wrong with a police officer killing someone who tried to kill him. Anyway what was the suspect expecting? Maybe he thought "hey if I attack this police officer, he will drop his weapon and fight me bear-handed".
|
ok put yourself in the police officer's sistuation you have a guy trying to smash your partner with a giant lead pipe and you have your gun on him, do you aim for the leg or arm and maybe miss, or do you shoot the guy in the chest where you are pointing the gun at?? I know which i would do, and i am sure its easy to unload a whole clip into a guy when adrendline gets you. Shame the guy had to die but he brought it on himself .
|
Title's definitely misleading, but whatever it'll be changed soon enough.
On topic: I think the cop did use more force than necessary - it definitely seemed like he wanted to kill the suspect rather than subdue him at that point. But given the situation I wouldn't say anything wrong of the officer. There was a man with a crowbar going at a fellow police officer. The guy that got shot had it coming to him, unfortunately. Hopefully (though I doubt it) he'll live..
|
On January 25 2012 05:18 iNcontroL wrote: excessive? Police are supposed to shoot to kill.. it isn't like he reloaded and unloaded on the guy again. If a cop EVER shoots it's not to stop or slow down someone or something.. it's to kill him. Get your facts right... do u really think every shot a police makes is supposed to kill ? lets start with the executions.
|
The cop that he swang at did actually fire a taser at him but you see him turn his head to it, and it just simply hits his hoodie. Although obviously its not shame an idiot like that was shot and killed (I mean he was obviously asking for it attacking a police officer) Firing 5 bullets point blank into his chest is way to much. And then the other cop pulling his gun and shooting him another 5 times when he is already on the floor?
Silly actions by both sides to be honest.
|
On January 25 2012 05:13 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On January 25 2012 05:09 killa_robot wrote: From the title I thought the police used a crowbar to kill the suspect... Same here. That would have been far more interesting. "Police kill suspect with Crowbar" is way too ambiguous lol. I assume that cops are supposed to shoot to incapacitate instead of kill unless they feel deadly force is necessary, and I don't think it looked like deadly force was necessary, despite the fact that the guy with the crowbar was clearly an idiot for arbitrarily running at a cop like that.
At least here in the US, that is not the case. By definition, a firearm (with standard ammunition) is deadly force. It's actually very difficult (and dangerous) to attempt to wound someone (extremity shot) vs kill (aim center mass) with a gun.
In this case it seems the police tried verbal force, followed by non-lethal force (taser) before responding with deadly force. Seems reasonable enough to me.
|
Well...From what the article says, the suspect had been given a lot of opportunities to drop his weapon, and was even tazed. Right before he was shot, he appeared to be readying his weapon, and the officer looked like he defended himself from potentially lethal force. It's not like this guy was brandishing a screwdriver or something....That thing looks deadly. I will cede that the officer probably fired more shots than he needed to, but technically I think he was right in dropping this suspect.
|
On January 25 2012 05:14 LesPhoques wrote:Terrible title, terrible people filming (Who the fuck laughs when someone is dead?) and correct decision by cops. Person with crowbar was a danger to public and to police officers. Cudos for police waiting for last moment to shoot. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt=""
They thought the police officer used rubber bullets according to what they said.
|
On January 25 2012 05:18 phlebas wrote: Fuck they killed Gordon Freeman.
RIP
|
The cop he was coming at didnt have a weapon drawn and practically wasnt looking at that moment. Put the other cop that fired first in an awkward spot.
Anyway, I'll keep this in mind next time i feel like causing trouble with a crow bar.
|
On January 25 2012 05:20 RoosterSamurai wrote: Well...From what the article says, the suspect had been given a lot of opportunities to drop his weapon, and was even tazed. Right before he was shot, he appeared to be readying his weapon, and the officer looked like he defended himself from potentially lethal force. It's not like this guy was brandishing a screwdriver or something....That thing looks deadly. I will cede that the officer probably fired more shots than he needed to, but technically I think he was right in dropping this suspect.
Dogs.
|
Took less than 2 pages to descend into people hating on police and on the U.S.. Amazing.
On topic: Unfortunate that he had to be shot, but he could have prevented his own death by simply following police orders. Simple as that if you ask me.
|
On January 25 2012 05:16 Caryc wrote: why not shoot him in his fucking legs? wtf.. Because, at least in the United States, officers are trained with the sole intention of shooting to kill. There is no such thing as shooting to injure, etc. While I do agree that 10-11 shots is excessive, the suspect did charge at an officer with what is considered to be a deadly weapon.
|
On January 25 2012 05:19 Skyling wrote: ok put yourself in the police officer's sistuation you have a guy trying to smash your partner with a giant lead pipe and you have your gun on him, do you aim for the leg or arm and maybe miss, or do you shoot the guy in the chest where you are pointing the gun at?? I know which i would do, and i am sure its easy to unload a whole clip into a guy when adrendline gets you. Shame the guy had to die but he brought it on himself .
How the fuck are you going to miss someone's leg when you unload 5 shots first then 5 more shots seconds later..?
|
I watched this without sound (not at home atm) and it looks like 100% cold blooded murder... Maybe with sound it's somehow justifiable but I don't think so...
The guy walks out, doesn't listen to cops, pretends to act tough.... and then he dies... dead... no judge, no jury, no crime committed that is worth more than a few months of community service, he just gets killed I can't imagine a reason for this beyond the cop wanting to prove to himself that he really is a "badass" and is capable of murder
This is insane....
|
Not excessive.
Police are also NOT trained to shoot to kill. They are trained to shoot to instantly end an engagement/diffuse a situation. Instantly. No officer ever wants to take a life or enjoys having to employ the use of deadly force. Which is why they call it "deadly force" and not "shooting to kill". The amount of force being applied has to immediately end the conflict, and this much force can cause death.
If you watch the video, the man is literally in the process of swinging his weapon at an officer. The officer firing the weapon did exactly what he had to do.
Think this is excessive is a joke... real life is not the movies. When you fire a weapon a person doesn't go shooting backwards, and you don't "aim for the legs". This is why police are trained to fire their weapons accurately and rapidly. He is not intending to kill his victim, he is intending to immediately stop him from trying to kill his partner.
|
|
|
|