|
Kabul (CNN) -- The ordeal of Gulnaz did not simply begin and end with the physical attack of her rape. The rape began a years-long nightmare of further pain, culminating in an awful choice she must now make.
Even two years later, Gulnaz remembers the smell and state of her rapist's clothes when he came into the house when her mother left for a brief visit to the hospital.
"He had filthy clothes on as he does metal and construction work. When my mother went out, he came into my house and he closed doors and windows. I started screaming, but he shut me up by putting his hands on my mouth," she said.
The rapist was her cousin's husband.
After the attack, she hid what happened as long as she could. But soon she began vomiting in the mornings and showing signs of pregnancy. It was her attacker's child.
In Afghanistan, this brought her not sympathy, but prosecution. Aged just 19, she was found guilty by the courts of sex outside of marriage -- adultery -- and sentenced to twelve years in jail.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/11/22/world/asia/afghanistan-rape/index.html?hpt=hp_c2
If you read on, the article goes to say that if she gets out of jail by marrying her rapist, she will be in danger from her attacker's family because of their "shame".
I don't even... Apparently she had brought great shame by commiting adultery when she was raped and impregnated... I guess it shows how much rights women have in Afghanistan.
Should she stay in jail to be safe? What should happen to her daughter?
|
This world sickens me sometimes.
|
This is just sad.......I can't see how they can find her guilty when it was sex against her will... But i guess the laws in Afghanistan are fucked up when it comes to women rights.
The guy got arrested and jailed too for rape? Couldnt find it clearly on the CNN article, only that reporters found him in a jail across the town (but not for what). Then at least there's a tiny tiny tiny little bit of "justice" that he is imprisoned too.
ps. nvm just re-read it and he's convicted of rape.
|
I know people, women's rights groups in particular, hate it when you "blame the victim". While that isn't my intention, I know that is how this is often construed:
How do we know it was rape and not her having an affair?
Upon reading more closely, he was in fact convicted of rape. And the incarceration of the victim is a regular practice, apparently, which is terrible.
|
On November 23 2011 20:38 Gnial wrote: I know people, women's rights groups in particular, hate it when you "blame the victim". While that isn't my intention, I know that is how this is often construed:
How do we know it was rape and not her having an affair?
Though i agree with you and its easy for a woman to yell "rape" and the community jump on top of it. In the article it says the man got convicted for rape, so i guess they have some proof against him?
|
Well, I've seen quite a few topic here in teamliquid where some people would systematically take the defense of rapists rather than their victims.
Afghanistan is screwed. When traditions are more important than the most elementary justice, there is not much to be done except fighting.
|
On November 23 2011 20:40 Mithriel wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:38 Gnial wrote: I know people, women's rights groups in particular, hate it when you "blame the victim". While that isn't my intention, I know that is how this is often construed:
How do we know it was rape and not her having an affair? Though i agree with you and its easy for a woman to yell "rape" and the community jump on top of it. In the article it says the man got convicted for rape, so i guess they have some proof against him?
Hm, dunno how I missed that. I should sleep probably.
|
This is system flaw. I mean, flaws in the laws?
Morally, it is not correct. The judge is brain dead? Earn so many money and hand out unjust law because it is law from the book.
Or maybe, judge is being bribed?
Ah, I am going to read the whole thing. ++ the other comments.
|
This is such a disgusting and ridiculous situation - "shouldn't have gotten yourself raped if you didn't want to go to prison". What the fuck? This is more than just blaming the victim for wearing a short skirt - it's actually making the victim the only bad person in this situation. What is wrong with these people?
|
I'm usually a moral relativity guy; that other cultures have different values and should not be looked down upon. But even this has it's limits. And this, my friends, is a limit. Truly disgusting.
|
Hence the backwardness state that the Middle East is in (no offence, just an observation).
They need to move on from that, do what the rest of the world did 50 years ago and acknowledge that women do have rights, and that there IS a real legal system that does work the majority of the time.
|
Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce".
|
On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce".
Apparently if she reported it she would have just been killed or incarcerated anyways. There was no benefit to reporting it.
|
I don't think there's much to say or discuss, this is just fucking disgusting and awful...
|
The worst part about it is there's nothing more powerful nations in the world can do about these human rights abuses in the middle east. The fact of the matter is that Shari'a law is out of step with basic, objective and incontrovertible notions of justice and rights, and it will never change unless it is forcefully changed.
|
If that's exactly what happened, then yeah, obviously fucked up. It's sad when "traditions" or religion intervene with common sense.
|
This is just awful... really sad to hear things like that =(
|
On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce".
is this a joke?
|
I'd look for an opportunity to slit the rapist's throat then commit suicide. Sucks to be born into the wrong gender in those countries.
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
This just makes me sick. It just shows how privileged we are not to have been born to a severely twisted and outdated culture like that.
|
Fundamentalism should be abolished in biblical proportion.
|
Would it be workings of Islam and the Sharia court or a flawed judiciary of a patriarchy?
|
Ugh, this churns my guts to read. Screw multiculturalism; if this is the product of a nation's judiciary, that nation has some problems they need to address.
|
Welcome to Islam. This happens in Iran all the time. You get raped, then you get charged with adultery.
|
Deuteronomy 22:28-29 “If a man finds a young woman who is a virgin, who is not betrothed, and he seizes her and lies with her, and they are found out, then the man who lay with her shall give to the young woman’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife because he has humbled her; he shall not be permitted to divorce her all his days."
Did he ever pay the girl's father the silver he owed him? Religious laws are so stupid.
|
On November 23 2011 20:41 Sickkiee wrote: Hence the backwardness state that the Middle East is in (no offence, just an observation).
Afghanistan is not in the Middle East. It is located in South Asia.
|
On November 23 2011 21:04 Ixas wrote: Would it be workings of Islam and the Sharia court or a flawed judiciary of a patriarchy? That is exactly what a Sharia court is about.
|
On November 23 2011 21:05 Aeres wrote:As much as this churns my guts to read, I can't help but feel that there are better places to post such articles. There's only one side to the argument; who's reading this going, "Yeah, I think it was a good choice to jail the woman who got raped"? No point to a news article here if you can't debate it.
I agree to 50%.
The remaining 50% would be to discuss if there is a "systemical" thing wrong with this culture who can allow such "laws" to be in effect. One basic thing that we can learn from history is that no legal system normally prevails for long if there's overwhelming resitance against it in society. Best example, the middle ages: everybody believed that everything the church told them was true. As soon as people started realizing that science isn't necessarily 100% evil, the system started to fade.
Which leaves the question: how can a society allow for such atrocities to be called "law"? This is NOT just one crazy-ass bastard going on a killing spree in a ground school...this is frickin LAW in this country. Why isn't there a huge outrage among the people there? Are they "really" satisfied with such...."justice"....?
|
On November 23 2011 21:08 Redox wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:41 Sickkiee wrote: Hence the backwardness state that the Middle East is in (no offence, just an observation).
Afghanistan is not in the Middle East. It is located in South Asia. "Afghanistan Listeni/æfˈɡænɨstæn/ (Persian/Pashto: افغانستان, Afġānistān), officially the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, is a landlocked country located in the centre of Asia, forming South Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East.[7][8]" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan)
|
There is so different moral codes around the world. :O What can I say? I feel REALLY bad for that person... ;( I hope she will get better life soon enough.
|
I've read similar stories before. Crappy all around.
|
On November 23 2011 21:10 sleepingdog wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:05 Aeres wrote:As much as this churns my guts to read, I can't help but feel that there are better places to post such articles. There's only one side to the argument; who's reading this going, "Yeah, I think it was a good choice to jail the woman who got raped"? No point to a news article here if you can't debate it. I agree to 50%. The remaining 50% would be to discuss if there is a "systemical" thing wrong with this culture who can allow such "laws" to be in effect. One basic thing that we can learn from history is that no legal system normally prevails for long if there's overwhelming resitance against it in society. Best example, the middle ages: everybody believed that everything the church told them was true. As soon as people started realizing that science isn't necessarily 100% evil, the system started to fade. Which leaves the question: how can a society allow for such atrocities to be called "law"? This is NOT just one crazy-ass bastard going on a killing spree in a ground school...this is frickin LAW in this country. Why isn't there a huge outrage among the people there? Are they "really" satisfied with such...."justice"....? Fair enough. Your point is quite valid, but unfortunately, the OP isn't really set up to make this sort of debate. I think it focuses too much on this particular case, and not the state of Afghan law as a whole, which really would be an interesting thing to discuss. Hopefully, mizU will update the OP and we can get some substantial, quality conversation going on here.
I retract my previous post. You win, sleepingdog.
|
On November 23 2011 21:14 Aeres wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:10 sleepingdog wrote:On November 23 2011 21:05 Aeres wrote:As much as this churns my guts to read, I can't help but feel that there are better places to post such articles. There's only one side to the argument; who's reading this going, "Yeah, I think it was a good choice to jail the woman who got raped"? No point to a news article here if you can't debate it. I agree to 50%. The remaining 50% would be to discuss if there is a "systemical" thing wrong with this culture who can allow such "laws" to be in effect. One basic thing that we can learn from history is that no legal system normally prevails for long if there's overwhelming resitance against it in society. Best example, the middle ages: everybody believed that everything the church told them was true. As soon as people started realizing that science isn't necessarily 100% evil, the system started to fade. Which leaves the question: how can a society allow for such atrocities to be called "law"? This is NOT just one crazy-ass bastard going on a killing spree in a ground school...this is frickin LAW in this country. Why isn't there a huge outrage among the people there? Are they "really" satisfied with such...."justice"....? Fair enough. Your point is quite valid, but unfortunately, the OP isn't really set up to make this sort of debate. I think it focuses too much on this particular case, and not the state of Afghan law as a whole, which really would be an interesting thing to discuss. Hopefully, mizU will update the OP and we can get some substantial, quality conversation going on here. I retract my previous post. You win, sleepingdog. 
It's in the article if you read the bottom.
The EU said it was concerned about the safety of the women in the film: they could be identified and might face reprisals. The filmmakers however suspect -- citing an email leaked from the EU delegation -- that the EU might also be motivated by its sensitive relationship with Afghan justice institutions, since he film shows the Afghan justice system in a very unflattering light.
|
On November 23 2011 21:11 blackone wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:08 Redox wrote:On November 23 2011 20:41 Sickkiee wrote: Hence the backwardness state that the Middle East is in (no offence, just an observation).
Afghanistan is not in the Middle East. It is located in South Asia. "Afghanistan Listeni/æfˈɡænɨstæn/ (Persian/Pashto: افغانستان, Afġānistān), officially the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, is a landlocked country located in the centre of Asia, forming South Asia, Central Asia and the Middle East.[7][8]" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Afghanistan) Thats a crap definition that only exist becuase of the stupid bush administration and their idea of the "greater middle east" but what ever.
Yes this is disgusting. Hopely we can gain something from this tragedy by having more people become aware of the fact that millions of people around the world are still being ruled by strict religous law.
|
On November 23 2011 21:07 Tachion wrote: Deuteronomy 22:28-29 “If a man finds a young woman who is a virgin, who is not betrothed, and he seizes her and lies with her, and they are found out, then the man who lay with her shall give to the young woman’s father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife because he has humbled her; he shall not be permitted to divorce her all his days."
Did he ever pay the girl's father the silver he owed him? Religious laws are so stupid. Yeah, it is kind of funny how Jewish/Christian people can be so critical of this practice and yet not remember that their own religion says this too, they're just ignoring it.
Anyway, it is sad for it to have happened in this day and age but people need to remember the culture they live in. If you lived 1000 years ago, I doubt you'd find it that uncommon or even bad.
|
On November 23 2011 20:40 Biff The Understudy wrote: Well, I've seen quite a few topic here in teamliquid where some people would systematically take the defense of rapists rather than their victims.
Afghanistan is screwed. When traditions are more important than the most elementary justice, there is not much to be done except fighting. That's what I meant to say last year when I got banned =3. Instead (in the context of the US presence there) I exaggeratedly said, "we'd probably be better off nuking that shithole."
Lesson learned. I guess I'll just stick with a +1. Ughhhhh T_T
|
Yet another reason the US needs to GTFO OUT OF AFGANISTAN. For as much as everyone likes to talk about how everyone in the world is the same and all cultures are equally valid and all that other bullshit. NO. No we aren't. Those people are not like us there culture is a few hundred years behind ours. I mean that literally. They are in the dark ages.Ever wonder what it was like to live in the dark ages when the church controlled the state? Just look over there. Not saying they are terrible human beings dont get me wrong. Get a history book you can see all the terrible things western nations did to their people when the church was the law. Inquisition anyone? Because you see you can do ANYTHING if god tells you. People in the west dont understand this mindset because we are so far removed from it that we cant wrap our head around it. Someone in the west kills a person and says well god told me to we just say they are crazy. In places like Afganistan where there is no real "government" and they still have freaking warlords ruling areas Islam is the law. They will kill you for denying Islam and its not crazy its normal. Btw its not islam or muslims thats the problem, its the basic separation of church and state. Its the fact that whereas the civilized world has figured out that you cant have people running the governmnet that literally speak for god himself and carry all the authority that brings.You cant have it. It doesn't work. The technology has advanced but the culture hasn't and until it does there is no reason to even bother trying to work with these people.
|
Its terrible, but the only people that can do something about it are the Afghans.
But its a whole culture there that needs changing and the only way to do it, is by the Afghans themselves.
|
On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". People should get imprisoned for having consentual sex? Sounds to me like you should move to Afghanistan then.
|
Afghanistan is so, so, so backwards.
Jesus Christ, how is this even fair?
|
Third world, what can you do?
|
I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion.
|
Third world, what can you do, and why would you expect anything better? They are just lunatics over there.
|
Maybe she had her cheeks revealed and her cousin's husband took it as an invitation to penetrate her.
Don't blame the culture, blame the government that put the laws into practice, it's going to take time for people to change and accept them.
|
On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion.
Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways.
|
That country is beyond retarded. Just nuke everyone there.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Haha, hilarious.
And this is why freedom of culture is a bad thing. Some cultures just have objectively stupid fucking things about them that should be outlawed by force.
|
On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways.
you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia".
the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem.
|
I dont know what the point of this thread is because there is actually not much to argue about. Sensationalism? Everyone would agree that the situation for women in those countries is still ridiculous, there are surely thousands of cases like this one.
Something really drastic would have to be done about this instead of arguing in a TL thread
|
Religion sickens me sometimes.
Deuteronomy 22:28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her, and they be found;
22:29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
|
On November 23 2011 21:47 CutthroatCollapse wrote: I dont know what the point of this thread is because there is actually not much to argue about. Sensationalism? Everyone would agree that the situation for women in those countries is still ridiculous, there are surely thousands of cases like this one.
Something really drastic would have to be done about this instead of arguing in a TL thread Yea! Bring them some esports streams so they can watch starcraft instead of beating women
|
This is going to turn into a religion thread sooner or later.
|
On November 23 2011 21:52 Shiragaku wrote: This is going to turn into a religion thread sooner or later.
It already has. She's in jail BECAUSE of religious law.
|
On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts.
Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious.
So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course.
|
Some people man.. Some people, their politics, their laws, their corruption; makes me fucking sick.
|
Clearly this is all America's fault for their Imperialist interventionist foreign policy. If they'd just left well enough alone she could have been beheaded in a public arena by the Taliban and we wouldn't have need for this pointless debate about civil rights.
Clearly this thread is in danger of slandering innocent, young Islam by suggesting that maybe archaic bronze age myth isn't a solid foundation for establishing our societies.
|
On November 23 2011 22:00 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts. Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious. So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course. islam isnt stupid, people are. Billions of followers and barely anyone actually bothers to comprehend the manuscripts. Instead it's the prophets that promise the most juicy pieces of the pie that get any attention. Sadly most people in the world are driven just by that- self interest and complete inability to employ logical thinking.
|
On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. However you want to spin it, adultery is a serious sin according to the Qur'an: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zina Any legal system based on the Qur'an will have to acknowledge that.
|
On November 23 2011 22:07 Sfydjklm wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:00 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts. Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious. So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course. islam isnt stupid, people are. Billions of followers and barely anyone actually bothers to comprehend the manuscripts. Instead it's the prophets that promise the most juicy pieces of the pie that get any attention. Sadly most people in the world are driven just by that- self interest and complete inability to employ logical thinking.
Exactly. If people just employ some logical thinking they would immediately realize how legit Islamic scripture is. It's so legit, man.
|
This is just sickening. I'm the same species as those people? How embarrassing.
|
On November 23 2011 22:08 naggerNZ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:07 Sfydjklm wrote:On November 23 2011 22:00 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts. Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious. So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course. islam isnt stupid, people are. Billions of followers and barely anyone actually bothers to comprehend the manuscripts. Instead it's the prophets that promise the most juicy pieces of the pie that get any attention. Sadly most people in the world are driven just by that- self interest and complete inability to employ logical thinking. Exactly. If people just employ some logical thinking they would immediately realize how legit Islamic scripture is. It's so legit, man. have you ever read Islamic scripture.
|
On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem.
You are right, I never read the whole 'sharia' law, I did however read studies on it and detailed summaries of its contents. I also read books on arabic culture and history. However that is completely besides the point.
Even if you did or did not read the sharia the way these laws are interpreted and used is a direct result of religious indoctrination and widespread cultural beliefs generated through these religions. Note how I am saying religions and not islam in particular. The same thing applies to the extremely harmful and silly statements the catholic church makes about numerous subjects such as condom use NOT preventing AIDS.
Fact is any Koran based religion (as are bible based ones) is very unfriendly to women and as a result their cultures are also very unfriendly to women, as demonstrated by this case and numerous others. So it is not strange to see people saying bad things about these religions, because cases like this really DO put them in a bad light.
On a side note however all the people saying 'Nuke the shithole' and similar remarks are equally clueless bigots.
|
On November 23 2011 22:10 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: This is just sickening. I'm the same species as those people? How embarrassing. I've said that same thing many a time whilst reading history.
|
We live in a sick world full of sick people..
|
Sounds fair... >_<
The moral compass the society has over there in certain issues is depressing sometimes.
|
What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
|
i don't understand this. seriously how can the LAW do this? i seriously can't understand their though process. I don't see how it's rational to put in jail because of adultery when she was raped.
|
Some traditions are just too much.
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
All of those things are disgusting and should not be tolerated. Of course we have problems with out culture aswell, I for one think that death penalty is ridiculous, also I don't understand how gay marriage is still illegal etc.......
You don't HAVE to tolerate other cultures, you can be reasonable, when you see something like this and be RIGHTFULLY DISGUSTED.
|
i would really like to hear what someone from Afghanistan has to say about this, i guess there would be some sc2 players from Afghanistan on TL.. but i mean, seriously this is so wrong, i dont even find words..
|
We're in 2011, we're an evolved specie, we are clever and... shit.... we do stuff that are dumber than the dumbest animal (beside human) could ever do. This is just too disgusting to be true. Human rights organization and all people with some sort of influence or power should DO SOMETHING. This is so fucked up... How can this be ?
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
Don't worry guys, Christian women get raped in the muslim world all the time. This is the war America is fighting: to replace the Taliban with another regime sympathetic to the evils of Islam.
|
On November 23 2011 22:00 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts. Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious. So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course.
This.
Even in the US a supposedly "religious" nation if you kill your kid or bomb an abortion clinic your ass still goes to jail. This shit is never going to end as long as people give it a pass in the name of "tolerance" "culture" and "religion". Im Christian. It says in the bible that you should be killed for working on sunday. Now I have yet to go kill anyone because they were mowing their lawn after church. Why? Because religions evolve along with everything else. These countries should be required to conform to the basic humane standards of the civilized world or be cut off from all its benefits.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 22:10 Harmen wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. You are right, I never read the whole 'sharia' law, I did however read studies on it and detailed summaries of its contents. I also read books on arabic culture and history. However that is completely besides the point. Even if you did or did not read the sharia the way these laws are interpreted and used is a direct result of religious indoctrination and widespread cultural beliefs generated through these religions. Note how I am saying religions and not islam in particular. The same thing applies to the extremely harmful and silly statements the catholic church makes about numerous subjects such as condom use NOT preventing AIDS. Fact is any Koran based religion (as are bible based ones) is very unfriendly to women and as a result their cultures are also very unfriendly to women, as demonstrated by this case and numerous others. So it is not strange to see people saying bad things about these religions, because cases like this really DO put them in a bad light. On a side note however all the people saying 'Nuke the shithole' and similar remarks are equally clueless bigots. Now mate, let me know how any "bible based" religion is very unfriendly towards women. Explain in no uncertain terms. With full understanding of the old and new covenants. I hope you actually know some theology before just taking bits and pieces out of anything. Because anyone can take anything out of context and quote-mine inappropriately. We can use PM if you think this will spiral out of control. I get frustrated when people lump the bible with any other religious text, sorry.
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote:
In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
While you're calling us culturally ignorant you might want realize that those tribes that have that disgusting semen ritual are from papau new guinea not "Africa". If you're going to insult us for being intolerant you could atleast be correct and not a hypocrite.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 22:21 Detwiler wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:00 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts. Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious. So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course. This. Even in the US a supposedly "religious" nation if you kill your kid or bomb an abortion clinic your ass still goes to jail. This shit is never going to end as long as people give it a pass in the name of "tolerance" "culture" and "religion". Im Christian. It says in the bible that you should be killed for working on sunday. Now I have yet to go kill anyone because they were mowing their lawn after church. Why? Because religions evolve along with everything else. These countries should be required to conform to the basic humane standards of the civilized world or be cut off from all its benefits. And you my brother in Christ, need to learn some covenant theology... Or else you and I SHOULD have been dead 10000x over. Romans ch.1-8, Galatians are good places to start. We are not jews and we are called Gentiles for a reason.
|
She got raped twice, once by that cousin's husband and by the legal system.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. lol at the "as does the Christian faith". Now mate, explain how any of the shari'a law mandated discrimination against apostates, women etc are reflected in the Christian faith. Note: Christian. Note: Not the old covenant.
|
On November 23 2011 22:08 naggerNZ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:07 Sfydjklm wrote:On November 23 2011 22:00 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 21:45 Skilledblob wrote:On November 23 2011 21:37 Harmen wrote:On November 23 2011 21:33 Skilledblob wrote: I ask myself when will people understand that there is no such thing as "the Islam". People here have no clue about culture, history or the contents of basic islamic literature and probably dont even understand that there is no such thing as a homogenous muslim religion.
And yet still every time something happens in muslim countries it is always because of the religion. Maybe that is because of their widespread use of sharia or sharia based laws. The moral code and religious law of the islam. Which sadly states such things, as does the christian faith. So yes you can directly blame religion and its backwards ways. you probably didnt even read the sharia and neither did I so why do you think that you are qualified to give any statements about it's contents and how these have to be aplied? This is a question you can find bookshelves full of arabic literature about. So like I said there is no "the islam" or "the sharia". the most important moral code for Afghanistans Pashtu population is the pashtunwali which is not a written moral code and this is the real problem. It's not an attack against Islam, but religous fanatacism in general. It just happens to be that Islamic fundamentalists are immensely more influencial than their cristian or jewish counterparts. Cristians and Jews have just as stupid and hateful laws as Muslims, which is why no countries take that shit serious. So yes, Islam is a retarded religion. People shouldn't be afraid of saying that. That doesn't make it any worse than other major religions of course. islam isnt stupid, people are. Billions of followers and barely anyone actually bothers to comprehend the manuscripts. Instead it's the prophets that promise the most juicy pieces of the pie that get any attention. Sadly most people in the world are driven just by that- self interest and complete inability to employ logical thinking. Exactly. If people just employ some logical thinking they would immediately realize how legit Islamic scripture is. It's so legit, man.
I wouldn't blame Islam here. Like with any tool humans have, you can use it for good or bad things. Look at the church. Today they do a lot of charity work etc. and 400 years ago they were burning people alive for not believing in their god. So i think in this case it is the society itself that is primitive and employs a primitive interpretation of a religion, in this case the Islam. And many cant imagine how much people are manipulated into doing stupid things. But please get me right, i am not religious at all. Actually quite the opposite. I just think that we shouldn't fall for easy answers and easy explanations. And its a fact that we must live with this kind of behavior for now. But its true that Islam right now has issues with violence but i think it derives much more from the cultures of the regions then from the religion itself. Islam just didn't have a time of Renaissance like Europe and therefore the western world had where the state and religion could be separated. Of course the case of this woman is an act of barbarism, but don't judge everybody for being born into a shithole like Afghanistan. We were lucky to be born in the west and to be educated. These people didn't have that luck.
|
United Arab Emirates18 Posts
As far as I'm concerned, I know that rape is punished by death penalty or whipping depending on the circumstances + compensation(not a fixed amount). Different scholars have different views on the matter.
Currently, Jail have substituted whipping but the death penalty still stands especially if he threatened with a weapon IIRC, didn't compare the country's laws with islamic law.
At any rate, its very tragic that the victims are blamed even if its proven just because of "honor". Cultures commit serious crimes using honor as an excuse but there is nothing honorable about what they are doing. (Another example would be old pagan/polytheist Arabs, who used to bury their daughters in fear of "shame" and "dishonor".)
Finally, The face cover is a cultural thing, scholars have had different opinions but the majority say its a cultural thing. Many departments discourage it due to ID reasons, you don't want people dealing with masked employees especially if that person deals with sensitive issues and you won't be able to identify them later.
|
On November 23 2011 22:19 Nothingtosay wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. All of those things are disgusting and should not be tolerated. Of course we have problems with out culture aswell, I for one think that death penalty is ridiculous, also I don't understand how gay marriage is still illegal etc....... You don't HAVE to tolerate other cultures, you can be reasonable, when you see something like this and be RIGHTFULLY DISGUSTED. You see, if you understand what you are saying, at its deepest discursive level, you would have avoided using the word "tolerate". It is such a philosophically loaded word dripping with false assumptions, and at worse, misguided moral perspective that, if you notice, no public intellectual, no matter how liberal, uses it in public discourse... since the 90s maybe.
And who decides if something is worth being "rightfully disgusted" about or not?
|
wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist.
|
That is one of the more ridiculous reads lately for sure...
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference.
|
On November 23 2011 22:24 Nothingtosay wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote:
In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. While you're calling us culturally ignorant you might want realize that those tribes that have that disgusting semen ritual are from papau new guinea not "Africa". If you're going to insult us for being intolerant you could atleast be correct and not a hypocrite. See. This is the danger of opening your mouth. Now everyone knows you don't know what you are talking about. What about sticking to your ID now... less harm for you.
|
[QUOTE]On November 23 2011 22:19 Nothingtosay wrote: [QUOTE]On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.[/QUOTE]
Ignorance or unchecked elitism? Are you serious? What is wrong with you? There's a line where your "culture" is no longer an excuse. If the Germans had just kept their extermination of the Jews in Germany would that be fine? It would be their culture. The moral ambiguity of some people is staggering. For the world to ever move forward there has to be some baseline of human decency. To each their own but there has to be limits for fucks sake. If people don't speak out if everyone is silent about things in the name of "tolerance and culture" no progress will ever be made. Look at apartheid. It was eventually ended due to the world coming together and saying no. No we aren't going to trade with you. We aren't going to give you aid. We aren't going to work with you in anyway till you fix these abuses.
|
That's just so tragic . . . the twisted sick irony in this is mortifying.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam
|
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 22:31 TheLOLas wrote: wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist. Welcome to Islam (when implemented correctly according to the Hadiths and Qu'ran.
|
Things like this make me crazy and shows the folly of cultural relativism. There are absolute rights and wrongs and a culture that supports things like this is just plain wrong.
|
On November 23 2011 22:44 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:31 TheLOLas wrote: wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist. Welcome to Islam (when implemented correctly according to the Hadiths and Qu'ran.
The Rapist is probably angry for his victim putting shame on his family. He's probably being celebrated as a True Muslim *TM*
|
And in the west women complain about not having more rights than men. Well ...
|
On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians.
|
On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam
On November 23 2011 22:44 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:31 TheLOLas wrote: wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist. Welcome to Islam (when implemented correctly according to the Hadiths and Qu'ran.
Well my own kid's nurse is actually muslim. Like going to the mosque and all. I don't exactly feel like she or her family has been taught from young that i'm "just dirt". Your ignorance is sickening.
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. Umm no I feel 100% confident that there is moral high ground here to take and a clear judgement to make. This new age cultural relativism is plain moronic.
You are just wrong here Zvek 100% wrong there are absolute wrongs and rights. I think we can all agree that killing someone who is not threat to you for fun would be wrong, even if it was normal in a society (lets say nazi germany), from there we can take a short walk to putting someone in prison for being raped. Yes it is wrong
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image.
The islamic Allah for anyone who is well versed in the Qu'ran, is not a loving God. Nor did he create us in his image. He is described as an impersonal God, detached emotionally, unreachable, indescribable and like no human. To say otherwise is blasphemy. He also does not have a definite way of dealing with sin, but arbitrarily lets people up into heaven, others into destruction. a muslim is not guaranteed salvation. His best hope is to follow the pillars and do his prayers every day and hope Allah has mercy on him.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 22:54 Kerm wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:44 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:31 TheLOLas wrote: wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist. Welcome to Islam (when implemented correctly according to the Hadiths and Qu'ran. Well my own kid's nurse is actually muslim. Like going to the mosque and all. I don't exactly feel like she or her family has been taught from young that i'm "just dirt". Your ignorance is sickening. Says the French man whose country is.... crumbling? with immigration problems? Says Europe which will accuse ANYONE who speaks against the evils of Islam and label them "islamophobe"? There are muslims and there are muslims. There are muslims like ones in Iran who simply don't care about any of it but see it as culture. Then there are wahhabi's and those who correctly interpret the qu'ran. There are liberal muslims just as there are liberal Christians. I must clarify that I am referring to the ones who follow the qu'ran and it's hadiths to the word. Not the liberal muslims who think it's just all culture and eeeeh haaaaaa whatever.
|
On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. The islamic Allah for anyone who is well versed in the Qu'ran, is not a loving God. Nor did he create us in his image. He is described as an impersonal God, detached emotionally, unreachable, indescribable and like no human. To say otherwise is blasphemy. He also does not have a definite way of dealing with sin, but arbitrarily lets people up into heaven, others into destruction. a muslim is not guaranteed salvation. His best hope is to follow the pillars and do his prayers every day and hope Allah has mercy on him.
Hail Satan.
Sorry, there's no way this guy is serious and I figured I would add to the ridiculousness.
At any rate, this is a prime example of a backwards culture. Really, there's nothing we can do to stop it short of annexing Afghanistan and bringing them McDonalds and Hummers (both kinds).
Horrible? Totally. Stupid? Even more so.
If you're looking for a great example of culturally-bound oppression, look no further.
|
On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. The islamic Allah for anyone who is well versed in the Qu'ran, is not a loving God. Nor did he create us in his image. He is described as an impersonal God, detached emotionally, unreachable, indescribable and like no human. To say otherwise is blasphemy. He also does not have a definite way of dealing with sin, but arbitrarily lets people up into heaven, others into destruction. a muslim is not guaranteed salvation. His best hope is to follow the pillars and do his prayers every day and hope Allah has mercy on him.
With the post (can't find it for the life of me LOL) of which you said Muslims think of white people etc as dirt.
To an extent, I think that's true also. Obviously, the ones raised in Australia, America etc won't certainly have that mindset, but if you go over to Afghanistan or of the likes, I do think that is the sentiment they have of us.
I also do know a few Muslims in my area that think like that. That Christians ( I am Roman Catholic, however not believing) will all go to hell, regardless if you believe or not. That is a negative aspect of their faith, no matter how people spin it.
|
This is plain stupid. It sickens me...
|
On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8.
I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either.
|
I am Afghan, and in afghanistan the war left no space for islam... Humanity shows its real face when the thin veil of civilization dissapears. This was rather a judical case involved with bribes and wrong understanding of honor than islam. But ive seen comments like "nuke them all" here, and some people apparently think that despite saying these horrible things, they are somehow on a higher moral ground. Just look how invadive some people s nature is. A rape and unjust happens thousands of kilometers away and has no other effect than to disgust and make themselfs feel better, so they demand nukes to kill several millions.
No, you are not.
|
The amount of stupid is astounding. Hope someone kills the bastard that did this to her.
|
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On November 23 2011 23:08 W.O.L.F.Y. wrote: I am Afghan, and in afghanistan the war left no space for islam... Humanity shows its real face when the thin veil of civilization dissapears. This was rather a judical case involved with bribes and wrong understanding of honor than islam. But ive seen comments like "nuke them all" here, and some people apparently think that despite saying these horrible things, they are somehow on a higher moral ground. Just look how invadive some people s nature is. A rape and unjust happens thousands of kilometers away and has no other effect than to disgust and make themselfs feel better, so they demand nukes to kill several millions.
No, you are not. You really should learn to ignore comments like those. Obviously a few people are overreacting by the shocking nature of this case. They don't really wish the death of millions of afghans.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us?
2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness)
3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian)
|
On November 23 2011 23:01 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:54 Kerm wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam On November 23 2011 22:44 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:31 TheLOLas wrote: wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist. Welcome to Islam (when implemented correctly according to the Hadiths and Qu'ran. Well my own kid's nurse is actually muslim. Like going to the mosque and all. I don't exactly feel like she or her family has been taught from young that i'm "just dirt". Your ignorance is sickening. Says the French man whose country is.... crumbling? with immigration problems? Says Europe which will accuse ANYONE who speaks against the evils of Islam and label them "islamophobe"? There are muslims and there are muslims. There are muslims like ones in Iran who simply don't care about any of it but see it as culture. Then there are wahhabi's and those who correctly interpret the qu'ran. There are liberal muslims just as there are liberal Christians. I must clarify that I am referring to the ones who follow the qu'ran and it's hadiths to the word. Not the liberal muslims who think it's just all culture and eeeeh haaaaaa whatever.
My friend, if you think there is an allpowerfull creationist entity in this infinite universe that actually cares about the random life form that is humans, you are the ignorant one and attribute way too much importance to the human race. To make an analogy (although not a great one) it's like bacteria having a religion thinking humans are gods that govern their lives and made up illogical rules for them to follow. (assuming bacteria were an intelligent life form). My thoughts about religion aside, looks like some zones of the earth are still in the dark ages. Convicting a raped woman of adultery and burning a man who says the earth is round are not that far apart on the moral vector when religion is involved.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37023 Posts
How is this situation POSSIBLY fair? She was freaking raped..... where's the justice?!
|
This is disgusting. I don't usually generalize people but seriously, what kind of stupid, irrational and outdated culture is so brainless as to kill a family member for being raped. There is a certain, wondrous thing called common sense and I previously thought that all humans had it.
|
Well, we Europeans also had to go through the middle ages and it's not like there was justice around every corner, especially with the church being as powerful as it once was, even more powerful than kings and kingdoms. So it is only natural, that they also have to go through such a process. The only difference between them and us a few hundred years ago is that they have guns instead of swords and shields.
|
On November 23 2011 23:01 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:54 Kerm wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam On November 23 2011 22:44 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:31 TheLOLas wrote: wow...what a way to start a morning. I feel bad for this girl. She had absolutely no control in the situation. Surely there is some way to persecute the rapist. Welcome to Islam (when implemented correctly according to the Hadiths and Qu'ran. Well my own kid's nurse is actually muslim. Like going to the mosque and all. I don't exactly feel like she or her family has been taught from young that i'm "just dirt". Your ignorance is sickening. Says the French man whose country is.... crumbling? with immigration problems? Says Europe which will accuse ANYONE who speaks against the evils of Islam and label them "islamophobe"? There are muslims and there are muslims. There are muslims like ones in Iran who simply don't care about any of it but see it as culture. Then there are wahhabi's and those who correctly interpret the qu'ran. There are liberal muslims just as there are liberal Christians. I must clarify that I am referring to the ones who follow the qu'ran and it's hadiths to the word. Not the liberal muslims who think it's just all culture and eeeeh haaaaaa whatever.
Ok I get it, you're just a troll actually. What is the point of insulting my country, and then agreeing with my opinion ? Yes you should clarify and make a difference between "muslims" and "islamist". Go find an english translation for the word "amalgame".
|
On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic
My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag?
The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year.
|
Wonderful culture they got there, I feel so enriched.
|
My brain went on strike while reading this.
|
Where in the world could this be? Oh it's Afghanistan, what a massive surprise that would be.
|
lol islam
lol
User was warned for this post
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
|
On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : ((((((( I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Haha.
and revelations is such a kind story of love, compassion, and forgiveness
|
Religion does nothing but ruin the world.
Maybe one day we will be without it.
|
On November 23 2011 20:29 mizU wrote:Show nested quote +Kabul (CNN) -- The ordeal of Gulnaz did not simply begin and end with the physical attack of her rape. The rape began a years-long nightmare of further pain, culminating in an awful choice she must now make.
Even two years later, Gulnaz remembers the smell and state of her rapist's clothes when he came into the house when her mother left for a brief visit to the hospital.
"He had filthy clothes on as he does metal and construction work. When my mother went out, he came into my house and he closed doors and windows. I started screaming, but he shut me up by putting his hands on my mouth," she said.
The rapist was her cousin's husband.
After the attack, she hid what happened as long as she could. But soon she began vomiting in the mornings and showing signs of pregnancy. It was her attacker's child.
In Afghanistan, this brought her not sympathy, but prosecution. Aged just 19, she was found guilty by the courts of sex outside of marriage -- adultery -- and sentenced to twelve years in jail.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/11/22/world/asia/afghanistan-rape/index.html?hpt=hp_c2If you read on, the article goes to say that if she gets out of jail by marrying her rapist, she will be in danger from her attacker's family because of their "shame". I don't even... Apparently she had brought great shame by commiting adultery when she was raped and impregnated... I guess it shows how much rights women have in Afghanistan. Should she stay in jail to be safe? What should happen to her daughter?
There are several prevalent religions in the states that share these exact same ideas.
Its not so far away from home
Im not being funny but shuoldn't someone posting some religious bs in a thread like this get an autoban on moral grounds?
If they can reject reason on the grounds of faith then they are supporting irrational stupid laws by extension of their own beliefs - which is pretty evil even if tacitly so.
JesusOurSaviour MAN is not depraved (how can someone who understands god be so blasphemous to describe his creation with an idea constructed by man?)... man is a being that get taught things. the depraved are those that teach man that logic and reason are not ways of understanding the world. Rather the word of some authority is what you shuold take as the way to live your life and you are not to question it - if you do then you are not being faithful. Simply put it is stating obey.
The depraved are those people that teach man to not think.
you are talking about informed and uninformed ... then you talk about his response ... how can something that can categorically be said to be impossible to exist or have any effect on this world in any way shape or form (even if there is a god this is true - yes if there is a god then he still doesn't exist) by its very definition have a RESPONSE? Are you really that stupid?
|
On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. I agree with you but the story is quite severe to my eyes nonetheless if it were true. However, I have almost no inclination to believe anything coming out of western new media on an orientalised culture (check this meaning of this word; it doesn't mean an Asian culture, it meanes an objectified culture that western or other ignorants view with a default moral highground). Islamic law and culture doesn't lack common sense contrary to western belief (since humans must have "common sense" to survive in society) so I doubt that anything except for the gaol sentence is correct here. We don't know whether it was really rape (because Shari'ah law punishes rapists extremely severely; ironically westerners would say the punishments of criminal Shari'ah law are inhumane) and the family's shame suggests that it was not truly rape. However, adultery is also a very severe crime in Shari'ah law so I understand that the woman would plead rape. I'm not really going to comment on the article further because I don't believe it but I don't have any evidence regarding it anyway.
However, making judgment on another culture's values in the name of democracy, peace and justice is the most absurd, pompous and ignorant thing that one can do. By playing to such basic human tendencies to believe that one's own normality is objectively the right or just one, America and its allies have committed a horrifying amount of crimes against humanity, genocide, whatever in the last few decades, all in the name of peace and justice. This isn't exclusive to America of course. For instance, I'm sure that Islamic extremists believe their own cause is just and infinitely more so than any western cause since their one is grounded by a divine law while western actions are driven by old men shouting in a parliamentary room. However, my point is there is no difference between the ignorant population of all cultures that prejudge the actions of another culture on the premise that their own culture is normal. For instance, an Islamic standpoint views western culture as disgusting, inhumane and evil (just like how most people here sees Islamic culture); divorce breaks a divine bond between man and woman; usury leads to greed, which is a huge temptation and motive driving bad acts; adultery is one succumbing to base instincts like base instincts to steal or murder or cannibalism (weeded out on western culture, unlike adultery).
Furthermore, Islamic law is a religious law with a divine and unquestionable source which makes it almost impossible to change (practically, it is impossible since the reinterpretation of the Shari'ah has been banned for hundreds of years now). From an objective standpoint, this makes it problematic to adjust to a new era led by western values, but this does not make it any more wrong than another law or culture. It is still correct that western culture today is led by "evil" or selfish motivations, probably more than any other era since religion (probably invented to give basic rights to everyone) is less prominent than ever. I'm actually agnostic but I can still recognise that democracy has led to a society where motivations are far more selfish and greedy than any other type of governance seen before. Democracy is practically driven by a mentality that everyone will stand for themselves and try to further their own rights while reducing their duties as much as possible, and that they will raise their voice to try to ensure that these wishes are granted, resulting in a compromise of give and take with every other member of society, except for those severely outnumbered who are then punished for their minority status in a compromised existence. It is pretty much a feudal society where the majority dominates the minority and one's place in the hierarchy depends on one's socialeconomic status. There is no guarantee of basic human rights beside those that the majority finds to be necessary to protect themselves. In this way, Islamic have been shunned and trashed in western culture to the verge of barbarism and primitivity. Thankfully, people are almost as equally narrow-minded in other cultures too; I say almost, because they actually recognise the sovereignty of other cultures as well instead of viewing them as primitive tribes that are ready to be liberated (hi America).
|
On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour,
I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?
Thanks
|
On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote: 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then?
Do whatever suits your best interests. If it's bad in the eyes of that faith just repent and maybe pay some money and it's all good.
|
Tribal traditions can't be reasoned with.
|
i thought the usa went in there to bring democrazy (@_@). religion hurt the world so deeply, i hope someday the damage it caused will be gone..
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks
I see what you did there
My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
|
On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : ((((((( I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin. Since no one else ever tought me correctly, will you tell me why God™ created the HIV virus then? Seems quite contradictory to this whole "cares for you" thing
|
Sounds pretty wrong to me. Law system always will have flaws T.T
|
Must be fun being a Women in these countries if she reported she got raped she wouldn't be able to married however if she was silent she would have been fine if she didn't get pregnant. Something similar happened in another Arab country a few teenage boys got raped by older men reported it and got tossed in jail for homosexuality while their rapist who were known by the victims had no charges placed on them.
This is a religious issue 4 people have to be present of said rape to be able to report rape in a lot of these Muslim counties just think how few rapist would be in jail if that was the only thing that mattered in your country.
|
This is everyday practice in shit countries. She was wise not to report it or she would likely have been stoned as an adulteress, having "seduced" the father of her child.
GG legal system.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 00:05 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : ((((((( I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin. Since no one else ever tought me correctly, will you tell me why God™ created the HIV virus then? Seems quite contradictory to this whole "cares for you" thing
Hi Vorenius, I've spoilered the response because it is too long.
For the classic netizens who want a TL:DR this is it: God created the world, and it was good (Gen 1-2). There was no death, no suffering, no sin, no shame. And then sin came. How? Through the fall (Gen 3). HIV? God did not create sin. Man did. God did not intend for sin to be part of His creation. He created it good. Man chose to wreck it. There are plenty of viruses which have wreaked havoc on humanity. The world is broken. The creation is groaning under the corruption of sin. The creation itself eagerly awaits renewal (Romans ch8). God will renew all things and sin and suffering will be done away with. + Show Spoiler + The fundamentals of Christian faith can be summed up in this:
Creation -- The Fall -- The consequences of the fall through human history -- The first coming of Christ, His death and resurrection -- the spread of his kingdom on earth through the gospel of love -- His second coming.
The HIV virus enters the world stage at the level of "the fall". Reading Genesis chapters 1-3 will cover the very most fundamental truths of the Christian faith.
Genesis 1: God created the world in six days. He proclaims "And it was very good". There was no evil. And creation itself was just as God wanted it to be. Man and Woman were created in the image of the Triune God. We are special. We are like God. And it's pretty awesome.
Genesis 2: Adam and Eve were living under the authority of God, provided by God with food, water and work. Adam and Eve were to propagate and rule over this beautiful earth which God has created for them and their descendants. They were going to live forever and rule this earth forever. But God gave them everything and permitted all fruits to be eaten in this bountiful garden. Bar one. This specific tree you are not to eat from, God tells them. Why? "but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Simple right? So we thought. And Satan drives a wedge of mistrust between Adam, Eve and God. And they disobey God. Disobedience towards authority is sin. Not just any authority, but God who richly provided them with everything and breathed life into their nostrils.
Thus knowing the consequences (for God had told them earlier if they ate from this tree they will surely die), Man suffered the curse. Genesis ch3 then goes on and describes suffering, pain and death entering mankind. Diseases, decay and even natural disasters entered. Animals began to eat other animals. Pain and suffering entered when before the fall, there was only goodness.
HIV virus is just another example of the suffering which humanity and the ENTIRE creation is plagued with because of the sin of man in disobeying God. The consequences were clear: if you ate from that tree (when there were plenty of other sweet fruits to eat from), then you will die. Unfortunately they did and suffering entered the entire creation. But there is hope for renewal and God has already begun it at the cross where Jesus overcame death. The new heavens and new earth are coming, as well as the final judgement when all evil will be punished and a perfect, sinless world will be restored with Man rightfully ruling it under God.
Fairytale or Truth? Your life is going to go for another 80 years at max (I assume TL-ers are 20 years old). You're going to find out one way or another. My appeal to all of you is to find out about the Loving God who came to earth as a Man, to be ridiculed by those He came to save. Find out about Jesus, the Christ. Learn the love of God for mankind and repent from your ways. We are all evil before God, but He is not a unforgiving judge. Forgiveness and freedom stands at the door.
|
7 Pages in and we're already in a full fledged religious debate?
Must be a record.
|
On November 24 2011 00:23 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:05 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote: [quote]
In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : ((((((( I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin. Since no one else ever tought me correctly, will you tell me why God™ created the HIV virus then? Seems quite contradictory to this whole "cares for you" thing Hi Vorenius, I've spoilered the response because it is too long. For the classic netizens who want a TL:DR this is it: God created the world, and it was good (Gen 1-2). There was no death, no suffering, no sin, no shame. And then sin came. How? Through the fall (Gen 3). HIV? God did not create sin. Man did. God did not intend for sin to be part of His creation. He created it good. Man chose to wreck it. There are plenty of viruses which have wreaked havoc on humanity. The world is broken. The creation is groaning under the corruption of sin. The creation itself eagerly awaits renewal (Romans ch8). God will renew all things and sin and suffering will be done away with. + Show Spoiler + The fundamentals of Christian faith can be summed up in this:
Creation -- The Fall -- The consequences of the fall through human history -- The first coming of Christ, His death and resurrection -- the spread of his kingdom on earth through the gospel of love -- His second coming.
The HIV virus enters the world stage at the level of "the fall". Reading Genesis chapters 1-3 will cover the very most fundamental truths of the Christian faith.
Genesis 1: God created the world in six days. He proclaims "And it was very good". There was no evil. And creation itself was just as God wanted it to be. Man and Woman were created in the image of the Triune God. We are special. We are like God. And it's pretty awesome.
Genesis 2: Adam and Eve were living under the authority of God, provided by God with food, water and work. Adam and Eve were to propagate and rule over this beautiful earth which God has created for them and their descendants. They were going to live forever and rule this earth forever. But God gave them everything and permitted all fruits to be eaten in this bountiful garden. Bar one. This specific tree you are not to eat from, God tells them. Why? "but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Simple right? So we thought. And Satan drives a wedge of mistrust between Adam, Eve and God. And they disobey God. Disobedience towards authority is sin. Not just any authority, but God who richly provided them with everything and breathed life into their nostrils.
Thus knowing the consequences (for God had told them earlier if they ate from this tree they will surely die), Man suffered the curse. Genesis ch3 then goes on and describes suffering, pain and death entering mankind. Diseases, decay and even natural disasters entered. Animals began to eat other animals. Pain and suffering entered when before the fall, there was only goodness.
HIV virus is just another example of the suffering which humanity and the ENTIRE creation is plagued with because of the sin of man in disobeying God. The consequences were clear: if you ate from that tree (when there were plenty of other sweet fruits to eat from), then you will die. Unfortunately they did and suffering entered the entire creation. But there is hope for renewal and God has already begun it at the cross where Jesus overcame death. The new heavens and new earth are coming, as well as the final judgement when all evil will be punished and a perfect, sinless world will be restored with Man rightfully ruling it under God.
Fairytale or Truth? Your life is going to go for another 80 years at max (I assume TL-ers are 20 years old). You're going to find out one way or another. My appeal to all of you is to find out about the Loving God who came to earth as a Man, to be ridiculed by those He came to save. Find out about Jesus, the Christ. Learn the love of God for mankind and repent from your ways. We are all evil before God, but He is not a unforgiving judge. Forgiveness and freedom stands at the door.
Pretty shitty deal that we get shafted because Adam and Eve fucked up.
Deuteronomy 24:16 notwithstanding?
|
On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes?
Thanks a lot.
|
On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian)
I am about to do 2 terrible things. Respond to one of JesusOurSaviour's posts, and respond with something other an a Haiku.
Saviour (If I may call you that for short), any time that people are loving for another reason than the sake of love, it has the potential to be harmful. If I love somebody because they have a Ferrari, then there is always the danger that they may lose that Ferrari. Obviously God isn't promising me a Ferrari (He isn't promising me a Ferrari ... is he?!), but he is offering me other things. Eternal life, being filled with the feeling of the holy spirit, feeling his love, these are all things he can give me.
I would argue that you don't need any of those things. I would say that you could be prepared to love for the sake of love, recieving nothing in return. Love free from religion, compassion free from a master. If I do that, what need does god fill? A selfish want to feel loved. You're as deserving of your own love as anyone else. Love yourself, and others.
Anything that you're attached to, can be taken away.
That being said ... back to the OP's topic!
As much as I try to respect other region's beliefs and traditions, there is something fundamentally wrong with a system that ignores the suffering of it's people, women or otherwise. Most religious texts were probably effective in dealing with the minimization of suffering for their time, but they are generally outdated and should probably not be followed verbatum.
|
On November 23 2011 23:43 tyCe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. I agree with you but the story is quite severe to my eyes nonetheless if it were true. However, I have almost no inclination to believe anything coming out of western new media on an orientalised culture (check this meaning of this word; it doesn't mean an Asian culture, it meanes an objectified culture that western or other ignorants view with a default moral highground). Islamic law and culture doesn't lack common sense contrary to western belief (since humans must have "common sense" to survive in society) so I doubt that anything except for the gaol sentence is correct here. We don't know whether it was really rape (because Shari'ah law punishes rapists extremely severely; ironically westerners would say the punishments of criminal Shari'ah law are inhumane) and the family's shame suggests that it was not truly rape. However, adultery is also a very severe crime in Shari'ah law so I understand that the woman would plead rape. I'm not really going to comment on the article further because I don't believe it but I don't have any evidence regarding it anyway. However, making judgment on another culture's values in the name of democracy, peace and justice is the most absurd, pompous and ignorant thing that one can do. By playing to such basic human tendencies to believe that one's own normality is objectively the right or just one, America and its allies have committed a horrifying amount of crimes against humanity, genocide, whatever in the last few decades, all in the name of peace and justice. This isn't exclusive to America of course. For instance, I'm sure that Islamic extremists believe their own cause is just and infinitely more so than any western cause since their one is grounded by a divine law while western actions are driven by old men shouting in a parliamentary room. However, my point is there is no difference between the ignorant population of all cultures that prejudge the actions of another culture on the premise that their own culture is normal. For instance, an Islamic standpoint views western culture as disgusting, inhumane and evil (just like how most people here sees Islamic culture); divorce breaks a divine bond between man and woman; usury leads to greed, which is a huge temptation and motive driving bad acts; adultery is one succumbing to base instincts like base instincts to steal or murder or cannibalism (weeded out on western culture, unlike adultery). Furthermore, Islamic law is a religious law with a divine and unquestionable source which makes it almost impossible to change (practically, it is impossible since the reinterpretation of the Shari'ah has been banned for hundreds of years now). From an objective standpoint, this makes it problematic to adjust to a new era led by western values, but this does not make it any more wrong than another law or culture. It is still correct that western culture today is led by "evil" or selfish motivations, probably more than any other era since religion (probably invented to give basic rights to everyone) is less prominent than ever. I'm actually agnostic but I can still recognise that democracy has led to a society where motivations are far more selfish and greedy than any other type of governance seen before. Democracy is practically driven by a mentality that everyone will stand for themselves and try to further their own rights while reducing their duties as much as possible, and that they will raise their voice to try to ensure that these wishes are granted, resulting in a compromise of give and take with every other member of society, except for those severely outnumbered who are then punished for their minority status in a compromised existence. It is pretty much a feudal society where the majority dominates the minority and one's place in the hierarchy depends on one's socialeconomic status. There is no guarantee of basic human rights beside those that the majority finds to be necessary to protect themselves. In this way, Islamic have been shunned and trashed in western culture to the verge of barbarism and primitivity. Thankfully, people are almost as equally narrow-minded in other cultures too; I say almost, because they actually recognise the sovereignty of other cultures as well instead of viewing them as primitive tribes that are ready to be liberated (hi America).
Well thought out well spoken good sir!
So aside from all that has happened and the drama in between, though you may disagree I'd like you all to take a look at this strong woman. Here all we can do is argue but keep the whole story fresh in your head for life or at least remember it. This woman has decided to move on and though on this side of the planet we can argue remember that this woman has chosen to walk through a minefield and continue on rather than give up. She may give up fighting for herself seeing or finding it to be fruitless against her society, but she has decided to fight for another one that being her child.
Having said that again please look at the strength of this story and not just the weakness.
Ps.When you lose everything you gain something.
|
On November 24 2011 00:36 Golem72 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 23:43 tyCe wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. I agree with you but the story is quite severe to my eyes nonetheless if it were true. However, I have almost no inclination to believe anything coming out of western new media on an orientalised culture (check this meaning of this word; it doesn't mean an Asian culture, it meanes an objectified culture that western or other ignorants view with a default moral highground). Islamic law and culture doesn't lack common sense contrary to western belief (since humans must have "common sense" to survive in society) so I doubt that anything except for the gaol sentence is correct here. We don't know whether it was really rape (because Shari'ah law punishes rapists extremely severely; ironically westerners would say the punishments of criminal Shari'ah law are inhumane) and the family's shame suggests that it was not truly rape. However, adultery is also a very severe crime in Shari'ah law so I understand that the woman would plead rape. I'm not really going to comment on the article further because I don't believe it but I don't have any evidence regarding it anyway. However, making judgment on another culture's values in the name of democracy, peace and justice is the most absurd, pompous and ignorant thing that one can do. By playing to such basic human tendencies to believe that one's own normality is objectively the right or just one, America and its allies have committed a horrifying amount of crimes against humanity, genocide, whatever in the last few decades, all in the name of peace and justice. This isn't exclusive to America of course. For instance, I'm sure that Islamic extremists believe their own cause is just and infinitely more so than any western cause since their one is grounded by a divine law while western actions are driven by old men shouting in a parliamentary room. However, my point is there is no difference between the ignorant population of all cultures that prejudge the actions of another culture on the premise that their own culture is normal. For instance, an Islamic standpoint views western culture as disgusting, inhumane and evil (just like how most people here sees Islamic culture); divorce breaks a divine bond between man and woman; usury leads to greed, which is a huge temptation and motive driving bad acts; adultery is one succumbing to base instincts like base instincts to steal or murder or cannibalism (weeded out on western culture, unlike adultery). Furthermore, Islamic law is a religious law with a divine and unquestionable source which makes it almost impossible to change (practically, it is impossible since the reinterpretation of the Shari'ah has been banned for hundreds of years now). From an objective standpoint, this makes it problematic to adjust to a new era led by western values, but this does not make it any more wrong than another law or culture. It is still correct that western culture today is led by "evil" or selfish motivations, probably more than any other era since religion (probably invented to give basic rights to everyone) is less prominent than ever. I'm actually agnostic but I can still recognise that democracy has led to a society where motivations are far more selfish and greedy than any other type of governance seen before. Democracy is practically driven by a mentality that everyone will stand for themselves and try to further their own rights while reducing their duties as much as possible, and that they will raise their voice to try to ensure that these wishes are granted, resulting in a compromise of give and take with every other member of society, except for those severely outnumbered who are then punished for their minority status in a compromised existence. It is pretty much a feudal society where the majority dominates the minority and one's place in the hierarchy depends on one's socialeconomic status. There is no guarantee of basic human rights beside those that the majority finds to be necessary to protect themselves. In this way, Islamic have been shunned and trashed in western culture to the verge of barbarism and primitivity. Thankfully, people are almost as equally narrow-minded in other cultures too; I say almost, because they actually recognise the sovereignty of other cultures as well instead of viewing them as primitive tribes that are ready to be liberated (hi America). Well thought out well spoken good sir! So aside from all that has happened and the drama in between, though you may disagree I'd like you all to take a look at this strong woman. Here all we can do is argue but keep the whole story fresh in your head for life or at least remember it. This woman has decided to move on and though on this side of the planet we can argue remember that this woman has chosen to walk through a minefield and continue on rather than give up. She may give up fighting for herself seeing or finding it to be fruitless against her society, but she has decided to fight for another one that being her child. Having said that again please look at the strength of this story and not just the weakness. Ps.When you lose everything you gain something.
Losing everything So much opportunity Full cups can't be filled
|
This is the great paradox of honor killings - to be raped, physically dominated by another, means that in this culture, you lose your honor - and by extension your family and community are dishonored as well - and in this culture the only way for your family or community to regain that honor you lost is by killing you. It is completely twisted against any sort of morality, including the tenants of Islam.
I'm actually studying honor practices right now - and this sort of conception of honor is similar to things like Atlantic slavery and footbinding in China - in that even people who do it recognize that it is morally wrong, in some cases illegal, and definitely against religious practice. The only way to end practices like this is to change people's conception of honor - making the immoral practice dishonorable. One of the ways to do this is to point out to those who participate in honor killings that it is shaming their nation among the international community. Unfortunately, sometimes all this does is produce a nationalist backlash.
Another way this might change is if the practice is no longer applicable to the society - in this case, it is regulating the sex lives of women, because traditionally in this culture that is all they care about. So if women continue to get educated and have public, prominent careers - being able to speak for themselves and not be defined only by their family - hopefully men will find it less necessary to so viciously regulate their sex lives.
|
On November 24 2011 00:50 jubil wrote: This is the great paradox of honor killings - to be raped, physically dominated by another, means that in this culture, you lose your honor - and by extension your family and community are dishonored as well - and in this culture the only way for your family or community to regain that honor you lost is by killing you. It is completely twisted against any sort of morality, including the tenants of Islam.
I'm actually studying honor practices right now - and this sort of conception of honor is similar to things like Atlantic slavery and footbinding in China - in that even people who do it recognize that it is morally wrong, in some cases illegal, and definitely against religious practice. The only way to end practices like this is to change people's conception of honor - making the immoral practice dishonorable. One of the ways to do this is to point out to those who participate in honor killings that it is shaming their nation among the international community. Unfortunately, sometimes all this does is produce a nationalist backlash.
Another way this might change is if the practice is no longer applicable to the society - in this case, it is regulating the sex lives of women, because traditionally in this culture that is all they care about. So if women continue to get educated and have public, prominent careers - being able to speak for themselves and not be defined only by their family - hopefully men will find it less necessary to so viciously regulate their sex lives.
Brilliant post, you nailed the heart of the problem sir.
People need to stop talking about "religion", specially when it's not their religion and they seem to have very few (if none) religious muslims friends in their surrounding to actually see with their own eyes that muslims are people just like you and I..
|
On November 23 2011 20:50 Tabula`Rasa wrote: The worst part about it is there's nothing more powerful nations in the world can do about these human rights abuses in the middle east. The fact of the matter is that Shari'a law is out of step with basic, objective and incontrovertible notions of justice and rights, and it will never change unless it is forcefully changed.
Well afaik the Sharia law can be presented in very different ways, and if you want it to be you can make it very humanistic. Like the bible. It completely depends on who's reading it.
|
One of the biggest problems with Islam in terms of the modern day is that a few centuries ago the "scholars" closed the books and said, no more interpretation. We've learned/examined all we need to know. And since Sharia was the basis of their legal system as well, the have more or less left their laws unchanged for hundreds of years. While there have been periods of progress, there have also been sharp steps back. Before the Islamic Fundamentalism that is the mainstay of the Middle East now, there was an idea of "Arab Socialism" which was the mainstay.
I bring this up because were interpretation still allowed, an exception could be made in the case of rape. The argument( a flawed one) that makes a scenario like this possible is that a woman's testimony alone is not considered sound unless backed up by another witness. In this case, the only other possible witness would be the rapist. And he obviously wouldn't incriminate himself.
This was put forth mostly for legal and financial document, as men hundreds of years ago thought that women were so softhearted that they would lie to protect the men in their family, either legally or financially, so that any sort of contract between two people could not have just one woman signing as a witness, it either had to be a man or a woman and someone else.
I don't agree with this. A lot of Muslims I know don't agree with this. But I'm just presenting the justification that went behind this decision for those who didn't know.
|
Afghanistan is just fucked up period. this is a complete violation of human rights.
|
I live in the Middle East and you hear things like that often. I once read in the local paper about a woman who was driven into no where and raped by her taxi driver. She was then found to blame in the court because she was too good looking and brought it on her self.
|
On November 24 2011 01:11 FJ wrote: I live in the Middle East and you hear things like that often. I once read in the local paper about a woman who was driven into no where and raped by her taxi driver. She was then found to blame in the court because she was too good looking and brought it on her self.
That is so messed up. Sigh. I don't even know what to say here, I just wanted to express my concern for women who are treated like this. I don't even want to get involved in the debate here, it can't go anywhere good, I just want to sigh.
|
I'm so happy that I live in a country where the government isn't totally fucked up yet.
|
Fucking disgusting, this type of shit happens way too frequently in the middle east. Every time I hear about something like this I become more and more ashamed of being from the middle east.
|
On November 24 2011 01:15 Jongl0 wrote: I'm so happy that I live in a country where the government isn't totally fucked up yet.
Its not only the government. Its the culture there that enables the government to do shit like this.
|
On November 24 2011 01:15 Jongl0 wrote: I'm so happy that I live in a country where the government isn't totally fucked up yet.
Yet? As if Afghanistan ever had a functioning government, or as if Sweden is about to have one that wont function.
|
This sounds like a potential Cannibal Corpse song. But man, this is inhumane.
|
On November 23 2011 22:31 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:19 Nothingtosay wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. All of those things are disgusting and should not be tolerated. Of course we have problems with out culture aswell, I for one think that death penalty is ridiculous, also I don't understand how gay marriage is still illegal etc....... You don't HAVE to tolerate other cultures, you can be reasonable, when you see something like this and be RIGHTFULLY DISGUSTED. You see, if you understand what you are saying, at its deepest discursive level, you would have avoided using the word "tolerate". It is such a philosophically loaded word dripping with false assumptions, and at worse, misguided moral perspective that, if you notice, no public intellectual, no matter how liberal, uses it in public discourse... since the 90s maybe. And who decides if something is worth being "rightfully disgusted" about or not? Who are you to decide whether or not I should be disgusted or find Afghanistan barbaric? I'm not from your culture.
Oh look, your argument is now contradictory. Hooray for cultural relativism.
|
|
On November 24 2011 01:50 Talent.L wrote: this is so fucked up..
Indeed, and its pretty sad to think that Lybia and Egypt and walking towards the same direction now that their american placed dictators are falling, and the islamic extremists will most surely win the elections
|
That's religion for you.
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
That being said, this is a horrid and despicable crime against a human being and indeed rather terrifying.
Says a lot about the men of a culture that relies so heavily on supression of women that they have to make adultery illegal (Jesus, I'd laugh about this if it weren't so utterly somber).
User was warned for this post
|
I'm surprised at how many people in this thread are seemingly unaware that there have been dozens of similar, fully documented cases over decades :/
This didn't surprise me in the slightest
|
On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip*
Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system.
|
On November 24 2011 02:56 Hittomogasin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip* Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system.
"These pigs"? Way to generalize.
And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government?
|
Islamic countries ftw. There honestly isn't a islamic country where such fked up stuff doesn't happen.
|
On November 23 2011 23:43 tyCe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. We don't know whether it was really rape (because Shari'ah law punishes rapists extremely severely; ironically westerners would say the punishments of criminal Shari'ah law are inhumane) and the family's shame suggests that it was not truly rape. However, adultery is also a very severe crime in Shari'ah law so I understand that the woman would plead rape.
For all your effort to sound like the enlightened one in this thread, these two sentences are kind of laughable as far as the logic and ignorance displayed. The statement "the family's shame suggests that it was not truly rape" shows that you know nothing about their cultural conception of honor. It's funny how you contradict yourself when you take a side on the matter and then go on to say you're not going to comment further because you "don't have any evidence." You criticized the media for not giving us reliable information and concluded from that that the women's story shouldn't be believed. Basically you confused your opinion of western media with your opinion of this woman's story.
|
Well fuck that. Who can we bribe to get her out of country? If I have the means I'll do it.
|
sorry but then everyone tells me to accept other mentalities and other cultures and other religions ... but if other cultures and religions includes this i just CANT accept them ...
|
Really? 10 years in jail for getting raped? Another thread that just shows how fucked up the world of retarded people is.
On November 24 2011 01:45 Dfgj wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:31 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 22:19 Nothingtosay wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. All of those things are disgusting and should not be tolerated. Of course we have problems with out culture aswell, I for one think that death penalty is ridiculous, also I don't understand how gay marriage is still illegal etc....... You don't HAVE to tolerate other cultures, you can be reasonable, when you see something like this and be RIGHTFULLY DISGUSTED. You see, if you understand what you are saying, at its deepest discursive level, you would have avoided using the word "tolerate". It is such a philosophically loaded word dripping with false assumptions, and at worse, misguided moral perspective that, if you notice, no public intellectual, no matter how liberal, uses it in public discourse... since the 90s maybe. And who decides if something is worth being "rightfully disgusted" about or not? Who are you to decide whether or not I should be disgusted or find Afghanistan barbaric? I'm not from your culture. Oh look, your argument is now contradictory. Hooray for cultural relativism.
edit: @Zvek Do you really support the idea that all cultures have equally valid value systems and should be treated equally?
|
On November 24 2011 03:11 ddrddrddrddr wrote: Well fuck that. Who can we bribe to get her out of country? If I have the means I'll do it.
What's the point?
It's their entire culture, why save 1 woman?
Women are not people in Afghanistan, they are property and baby making machines in the eyes of their men and their religion.
A raped woman is like a broken product, one that the rapist is being forced to buy out of shame.
|
On November 23 2011 22:55 mechavoc wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. Umm no I feel 100% confident that there is moral high ground here to take and a clear judgement to make. This new age cultural relativism is plain moronic. You are just wrong here Zvek 100% wrong there are absolute wrongs and rights. I think we can all agree that killing someone who is not threat to you for fun would be wrong, even if it was normal in a society (lets say nazi germany), from there we can take a short walk to putting someone in prison for being raped. Yes it is wrong
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law
Man we got to that point fast. I think this is a sign that this thread needs to close before the religious debate turns into some huge mess...
On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either.
Crap, seems it's too late.
|
On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 02:56 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip* Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system. "These pigs"? Way to generalize. And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government?
Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs".
|
On November 23 2011 21:12 Ryndika wrote: There is so different moral codes around the world. :O What can I say? I feel REALLY bad for that person... ;( I hope she will get better life soon enough.
The problem is, in that culture, I don't think she can get a better life. With education for women being frowned upon, it would be very difficult to improve her situation.
However, I think I understand what you're saying. There is a phenomenon at work in these sorts of situations called "narcotization" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcotization) wherein you basically feel like you are stuck with a certain fate. Essentially, you feel there is nothing that can be done (which has implications for our society and its media use/consumption).
And, to put a slightly positive spin on this... even though this sounds horrible, the woman actually got off better now than she would have earlier in time. Previously, the woman wasn't jailed, she was killed. By her OWN family. Because she caused them "shame." It doesn't make sense, but I guess that's fundamental religion for you.
|
On November 24 2011 03:21 Robstickle wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 02:56 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip* Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system. "These pigs"? Way to generalize. And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government? Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs".
If you were born in Afghanistan you'd have the exact same attitude. That wouldn't make you a pig. Given the "right" cultural and religious background, everyone becomes an asshole.
|
On November 24 2011 03:25 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:21 Robstickle wrote:On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote: "These pigs"? Way to generalize.
And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government? Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs". If you were born in Afghanistan you'd have the exact same attitude. That wouldn't make you a pig. Given the "right" cultural and religious background, everyone becomes an asshole. Postmodern cultural relativism is useful for winning internet arguments, but useless in just about everything else.
Congratulations I guess?
|
On November 24 2011 03:25 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:21 Robstickle wrote:On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 02:56 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip* Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system. "These pigs"? Way to generalize. And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government? Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs". If you were born in Afghanistan you'd have the exact same attitude. That wouldn't make you a pig. Given the "right" cultural and religious background, everyone becomes an asshole.
It would make you an ignorant pig. Just because you don't know your culture is wrong doesn't make it right.
|
On November 24 2011 03:27 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:25 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 03:21 Robstickle wrote:On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote: "These pigs"? Way to generalize.
And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government? Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs". If you were born in Afghanistan you'd have the exact same attitude. That wouldn't make you a pig. Given the "right" cultural and religious background, everyone becomes an asshole. Postmodern cultural relativism is useful for winning internet arguments, but useless in just about everything else. Congratulations I guess?
About as useful as insulting people for having the bad luck of being born in the wrong society...
Don't piss on all Muslims, piss on the Muslim influence on politics in oriental societies.
On November 24 2011 03:28 SafeAsCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:25 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 03:21 Robstickle wrote:On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 02:56 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip* Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system. "These pigs"? Way to generalize. And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government? Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs". If you were born in Afghanistan you'd have the exact same attitude. That wouldn't make you a pig. Given the "right" cultural and religious background, everyone becomes an asshole. It would make you an ignorant pig. Just because you don't know your culture is wrong doesn't make it right.
I'm not saying they are right, I'm saying their society as a whole has to change... How the fuck is a person to learn to reflect if they are never taught?
If you've been taught that dogmatic, religious nonsense all life long, there's not much chance for critical reflection.
€ Grammar
|
At some point, this fire will burn out of control. Reason is coming, and he is not happy.
|
On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 02:56 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 02:37 kafkaesque wrote: *snip*
I like how we act all high and mighty because women are so equal in our society and 50 years ago women weren't even allowed to vote in most occidental countries and faggots are still not even allowed to marry everywhere.
Just because Western culture is a little more developed, we have no right to get all superiour about it.
*snip* Way to generalize everybody. I dont know where you are from, but this sort of treatment is nothing short of barbaric and would be the a horror story of decade should it hapen in finland. On a cultural development, we are several hundred years ahead to these pigs and their law system. "These pigs"? Way to generalize. And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government?
"These pigs" as in people responsible for rape and then the injustice of their system. Not "everybody in midle east." Dont try to put words in my mouth or twist it.
As for our political state... still hundreds of years ahead of theirs. Sitsuation is this partly because of news like these, and mostly because of finnish disatisfaction to the europe and as a message to the rest of the leadership that people can still kick their ass if they get annoyed enough. Unlike in some countries that call them selfs democratic, we can actually change the leadership here in finland.
|
That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8.
I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either.
The world would be a far worse place without both. No modern medicine or advanced mathematics or the scientific method, no preservation of the writing of the Greek philosophers and poets (epic and not), no continuation of the Roman common law, basically the entire foundation of the modern Western world is built with Greco-Roman and Chinese ideas preserved and improved upon by Christian and Muslim men of faith.
Historical illiterates like you never cease to amaze.
It's also lazy, sloppy and shallow to single out religion for behavior that also arises independent of religion. The Chinese and Mongols, in their recent and not-so-recent pasts, had little trouble killing, raping, pillaging, and ruling over at least ten times more people than Islam and Christianity have done the same to.
Without a religious basis for it.
|
Wow... who in their right mind would ever think of imprisoning someone for getting raped?
|
On November 24 2011 03:46 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +hat might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8.
I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. The world would be a far worse place without both. Historical illiterates like you never cease to amaze.
You'll have to elaborate that.
Pre-christian high cultures (ancient Rome and Greece, but also China) had a much further developed system of basically anything, especially regarding law and ethics. Christianity was a huge setback humanity as a whole.
If you compare 100 bc. and the middles ages, you will notices that the latter had more advanced medicine, philosophy, architecture, law and so on. Imagine the Roman Empire developing unhindred for 2000 more years, we'd finally have decent jetpacks now.
|
On November 24 2011 03:12 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Really? 10 years in jail for getting raped? Another thread that just shows how fucked up the world of retarded people is. Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 01:45 Dfgj wrote:On November 23 2011 22:31 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 22:19 Nothingtosay wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. All of those things are disgusting and should not be tolerated. Of course we have problems with out culture aswell, I for one think that death penalty is ridiculous, also I don't understand how gay marriage is still illegal etc....... You don't HAVE to tolerate other cultures, you can be reasonable, when you see something like this and be RIGHTFULLY DISGUSTED. You see, if you understand what you are saying, at its deepest discursive level, you would have avoided using the word "tolerate". It is such a philosophically loaded word dripping with false assumptions, and at worse, misguided moral perspective that, if you notice, no public intellectual, no matter how liberal, uses it in public discourse... since the 90s maybe. And who decides if something is worth being "rightfully disgusted" about or not? Who are you to decide whether or not I should be disgusted or find Afghanistan barbaric? I'm not from your culture. Oh look, your argument is now contradictory. Hooray for cultural relativism. edit: @Zvek Do you really support the idea that all cultures have equally valid value systems and should be treated equally? On what criteria do you judge a culture?
For a Taliban, we all are depraved corrupted greedy nihilistic people.
I stand or fight for my ideas and my ethical position, but I know that they are not intrinsically "better". They are from my point of view, obviously, but I hardly see on what basis I could pretend them to be universal. And I try as much as possible to be ruthlessly critical towards the values of the society I live in.
On November 24 2011 03:51 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:46 DeepElemBlues wrote:hat might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8.
I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. The world would be a far worse place without both. Historical illiterates like you never cease to amaze. You'll have to elaborate that. Pre-christian high cultures (ancient Rome and Greece) had a much further developed system of basically anything, especially regarding law and ethics. Christianity was a huge setback humanity as a whole. That's completely off-topic, but I think you over-estimate how brutal ancient societies were. Both Christianity and Islam have been an enormous contribution to humanity as a whole, whether it is on a cultural or moral level.
Don't blame Islam for the Taliban, the same way that you shouldn't blame Christianity for the american fundamentalists. The problem is that they are idiots, not that they are christians.
On November 24 2011 03:27 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:25 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 03:21 Robstickle wrote:On November 24 2011 03:03 kafkaesque wrote: "These pigs"? Way to generalize.
And didn't Finland just elect a right-wing party into government? Treating women like this is commonly accepted in Afghanistan and even institutionalized so yes "these pigs". If you were born in Afghanistan you'd have the exact same attitude. That wouldn't make you a pig. Given the "right" cultural and religious background, everyone becomes an asshole. Postmodern cultural relativism is useful for winning internet arguments, but useless in just about everything else. Congratulations I guess? Since when is a system of thought or a philosophical position supposed to be "useful"? You don't like postmodern thought, that's fine. Personally, I think this typically American idea that we are the good one, with an unlighted culture, a fair system and a solid moral position while everybody else is just "behind" is incredibly naive, silly, and dangerous.
That's not to excuse Taliban, or the bastards who did put this woman in jail. But first step to do anything about something like that is to realize that they do live in a society that is different, has other values and a completely other way of defining what is right or wrong.
|
I'm impressed and scared that there are humans in this world that look at that ruling and think justice has been served, not to mention the people who actually handed out that sentence.
|
You'll have to elaborate that.
Pre-christian high cultures (ancient Rome and Greece) had a much further developed system of basically anything, especially regarding law and ethics. Christianity was a huge setback humanity as a whole.
You really can't be serious.
It was the fall of Rome and Mongoloid groups pushing Germans from East to Central to Western Europe that caused the deterioration of society, not Christianity. The Volkerwanderung?
From ~400 to ~1000 in Europe the Roman Catholic Church was the only organization keeping reading, writing, law and ethics alive. And the idea that ethics deteriorated from some higher level that existed in Roman times is pure fantasy, at least among the nobility there was no such deterioration, they stayed the same.
If you compare 100 bc. and the middles ages, you will notices that the latter had more advanced medicine, philosophy, architecture, law and so on. Imagine the Roman Empire developing unhindred for 2000 more years, we'd finally have decent jetpacks now.
The idea that Christianity was responsible for the decline and fall of the Roman Empire is maybe 10% of the story, sorry. It's adoption as the Roman state religion helped weaken the bonds of the various Roman subject peoples, but that's about it. And that is because the Roman state persecuted non-Christians as harshly as it had non-Emperor worshipers before. Christianity itself had little to do with it, Romans acting like Romans is what happened. More than half the fault is of successive generations of the Roman upper class raping the treasury and failing to maintain the legions and empire's infrastructure properly. Several famines and plagues that hit in the 4th and 5th century, and most of all the migration of massive Germanic pagan tribes into Roman territory who warred with and eventually defeated the Western Roman Empire.
What are they teaching in schools these days, that people really believe Christianity was responsible for the Low Middle Ages ("Dark" Age)?
|
On November 24 2011 03:46 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +hat might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8.
I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. The world would be a far worse place without both. Historical illiterates like you never cease to amaze.
On what basis can you make that claim? We dont have written history without religion, so we dont really know what the world would be like without those two. How ever, we do have strongly secular countries that flat out ignore most of the religious teachings, and still country like finland has good justice system, woman president, prime minister, damn near free education to everybody and our poverty ratings are very low.
|
On November 24 2011 03:59 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +You'll have to elaborate that.
Pre-christian high cultures (ancient Rome and Greece) had a much further developed system of basically anything, especially regarding law and ethics. Christianity was a huge setback humanity as a whole. You really can't be serious. It was the fall of Rome and Mongoloid groups pushing Germans from East to Central to Western Europe that caused the deterioration of society, not Christianity. The Volkerwanderung? From ~400 to ~1000 in Europe the Roman Catholic Church was the only organization keeping reading, writing, law and ethics alive. And the idea that ethics deteriorated from some higher level that existed in Roman times is pure fantasy, at least among the nobility there was no such deterioration, they stayed the same. I think you should read Nietzsche if you want to understand what one can really blame Christianity for.
I don't have an opinion on whether Christianity was "good" or "bad" since I think it doesn't mean anything at all, but I dislike most of its inheritance. Most of what I find great about our society and culture has been for a big part built up against Christianity (idea of freedom, of equality, secular justice, all what you would call "enlightenment", half of the arts, etc...)
|
On November 24 2011 03:59 Count9 wrote: I'm impressed and scared that there are humans in this world that look at that ruling and think justice has been served, not to mention the people who actually handed out that sentence.
An omnipotent god said that the rules that they have are correct. The people who handed out that sentence had no reason to think what is right or wrong, when they can read from their holy book that what they are doing is in fact the right thing to do. Why change something that has worked for +1000 years, over a newly found idealism about women rights?
|
On November 24 2011 04:08 Sea_Food wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 03:59 Count9 wrote: I'm impressed and scared that there are humans in this world that look at that ruling and think justice has been served, not to mention the people who actually handed out that sentence. An omnipotent god said that the rules that they have are correct. The people who handed out that sentence had no reason to think what is right or wrong, when they can read from their holy book that what they are doing is in fact the right thing to do. Sounds almost like American politics and the Constitution
|
On November 23 2011 23:03 Sickkiee wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:34 CaptainCrush wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. In all the time I have spent browsing team liquid, this is one of the most uneducated and ridiculously WRONG posts I have seen. Wrong on so many places that I dont even know where to start....You may actually be part of the problem if you think this is just an example of a cultural difference. So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. The islamic Allah for anyone who is well versed in the Qu'ran, is not a loving God. Nor did he create us in his image. He is described as an impersonal God, detached emotionally, unreachable, indescribable and like no human. To say otherwise is blasphemy. He also does not have a definite way of dealing with sin, but arbitrarily lets people up into heaven, others into destruction. a muslim is not guaranteed salvation. His best hope is to follow the pillars and do his prayers every day and hope Allah has mercy on him. With the post (can't find it for the life of me LOL) of which you said Muslims think of white people etc as dirt. To an extent, I think that's true also. Obviously, the ones raised in Australia, America etc won't certainly have that mindset, but if you go over to Afghanistan or of the likes, I do think that is the sentiment they have of us. I also do know a few Muslims in my area that think like that. That Christians ( I am Roman Catholic, however not believing) will all go to hell, regardless if you believe or not. That is a negative aspect of their faith, no matter how people spin it. Uh... I was raised Roman Catholic and while they never emphasized that part of the faith. I know in other places Christianity has the same premise that no matter how good they are if they don't believe in god they will all go to hell. So its not just Islam.
|
On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce".
So many things about your post is flat out disturbing and ignorant, it scares me that people like you can vote in this country.
|
On November 24 2011 04:10 FabledIntegral wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". So many things about your post is flat out disturbing and ignorant, it scares me that people like you can vote in this country. Do you think he's serious?
|
On November 24 2011 03:59 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +You'll have to elaborate that.
Pre-christian high cultures (ancient Rome and Greece) had a much further developed system of basically anything, especially regarding law and ethics. Christianity was a huge setback humanity as a whole. You really can't be serious. It was the fall of Rome and Mongoloid groups pushing Germans from East to Central to Western Europe that caused the deterioration of society, not Christianity. The Volkerwanderung? From ~400 to ~1000 in Europe the Roman Catholic Church was the only organization keeping reading, writing, law and ethics alive. And the idea that ethics deteriorated from some higher level that existed in Roman times is pure fantasy, at least among the nobility there was no such deterioration, they stayed the same. Show nested quote +If you compare 100 bc. and the middles ages, you will notices that the latter had more advanced medicine, philosophy, architecture, law and so on. Imagine the Roman Empire developing unhindred for 2000 more years, we'd finally have decent jetpacks now. The idea that Christianity was responsible for the decline and fall of the Roman Empire is maybe 10% of the story, sorry. It's adoption as the Roman state religion helped weaken the bonds of the various Roman subject peoples, but that's about it. And that is because the Roman state persecuted non-Christians as harshly as it had non-Emperor worshipers before. Christianity itself had little to do with it, Romans acting like Romans is what happened. More than half the fault is of successive generations of the Roman upper class raping the treasury and failing to maintain the legions and empire's infrastructure properly. Several famines and plagues that hit in the 4th and 5th century, and most of all the migration of massive Germanic pagan tribes into Roman territory who warred with and eventually defeated the Western Roman Empire. What are they teaching in schools these days, that people really believe Christianity was responsible for the Low Middle Ages ("Dark" Age)?
No man, I think you were mistunderstanding me.
I didn't want to insinuate that Christianity was responsible for the Fall of Rome or the Dark Age (not solely, at least) but merely that there were cultures before Christianity and Islam that worked just fine.
I'm aware of the Völkerwanderung and a general world history and all that Jazz, but I still think that at least modern governments would do well to exclude any religious influences in their decision-making, as naive as that may sound.
|
As far as I'm concerned, Islam is a legit religion and has done mostly good to it's true followers. It is people, like the once that try to make a "Muslim" government that piss me off. They corrupt a religion, and use it as a cover for their total ignorance of everything, which results in ignorant people thinking the cause of all this is the religion, rather than the people. If I claimed I was, say, a Hindu, I could both choose to be a good person, and do good deeds in my life, or go massacre a village of people. I would still be called Hindu whether or not I decided to massacre the village, but once I choose to commit the massacre, people always choose to believe that the reason I did it was because my religion influenced me, while in reality I didn't have a single clue about what the religion teaches.
When it comes to this case, this just shows the corruption and lack of women-rights in Afghanistan. While I hope justice will come to the women, it probably won't, which is a sad part of life.
|
On November 23 2011 20:38 Gnial wrote: I know people, women's rights groups in particular, hate it when you "blame the victim". While that isn't my intention, I know that is how this is often construed:
How do we know it was rape and not her having an affair?
Upon reading more closely, he was in fact convicted of rape. And the incarceration of the victim is a regular practice, apparently, which is terrible. wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation
|
On what basis can you make that claim? We dont have written history without religion, so we dont really know what the world would be like without those two. How ever, we do have strongly secular countries that flat out ignore most of the religious teachings, and still country like finland has good justice system, woman president, prime minister, damn near free education to everybody and our poverty ratings are very low.
On the basis that it is what happened and the people and organizations responsible deserve credit for it.
"Someone else woulda done it" isn't an argument against giving credit. Not a good one anyway.
Finland and other "secular" countries, you are so proud of making claims like what you say, you act like Christianity has no relationship or connection to your culture, when almost 100% of your culture, including secularism, is a product of Christianity! It's very funny.
Who do you think the first men were, who set the foundations for the intellectual development that resulted in things like secularism? Christians and Jews! Arguing first against Roman oppression and then Roman Catholic oppression.
Where did the "secular" idea of critical analysis come from? Christians, who wanted to read the Bible for themselves in their own languages and decide for themselves what Christianity was about, not what the Catholic Church told them!
Etc., etc., look. For a thousand or so years, Christianity and Islam were the only places around (outside of China) where you could go if you wanted to learn to read and write, learn mathematics, law, science, philosophy etc., such as they were. Learn the facts. The intellectual foundations of our whole society were rebuilt by religious men. In between the Greco-Roman era and the Renaissance, it's hard to find a European or Muslim great scientist or writer or thinker who was not driven at least in part in his quest for knowledge by his faith. Martin Luther is a good example, that Protestantism thing? That was religious you know. Reason and logic? Thomas Aquinas and others Muslim and Christian, using the writings of the old Greek philosophers to examine their religions and world to discover and understand "the glory of God's creation," as they viewed it.
|
On November 24 2011 04:17 IamBach wrote: wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation It may not in the US but other counties actually value the sanctity of a marriage especially countries that hold religion in such high regard. Never understood why someone would have an affair, if you hate your spouse so much just get a divorce then you can start a new relationship with this other person. People are so impatient.
|
On November 24 2011 04:23 LlOoKkIi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:17 IamBach wrote: wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation It may not in the US but other counties actually value the sanctity of a marriage especially countries that hold religion in such high regard. Never understood why someone would have an affair, if you hate your spouse so much just get a divorce then you can start a new relationship with this other person. People are so impatient. Wow, so it's in the hands of government to uphold the sanctity of things now?
|
On November 24 2011 04:23 LlOoKkIi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:17 IamBach wrote: wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation It may not in the US but other counties actually value the sanctity of a marriage especially countries that hold religion in such high regard. Never understood why someone would have an affair, if you hate your spouse so much just get a divorce then you can start a new relationship with this other person. People are so impatient.
Yeah, if a Muslim woman doesn't like her spouse, she'll just divorce him. That's exactly how it works.
|
On November 24 2011 04:23 LlOoKkIi wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:17 IamBach wrote: wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation It may not in the US but other counties actually value the sanctity of a marriage especially countries that hold religion in such high regard. Never understood why someone would have an affair, if you hate your spouse so much just get a divorce then you can start a new relationship with this other person. People are so impatient.
It is not the states place to enforce any of that.
It may be a dick thing to have an affair but the government shouldn't get involved in the personal lives of it's citizens. I literally get chills just thinking about what a terrible society the west will become if we actually enforced laws like that. Government getting insanely involved in citizens lives whilst dictating religious laws...that's the opposite of where we want to go.
Many people would say cheating in general is wrong. Should we go and give people fines or jail time for cheating on their boyfriends/girlfriends?
It's seriously creepy to hear people talk about such extreme end of the spectrum measures for what are personal affairs.
|
Terrible shit... Seriously I would say something horrible about their culture/religion in which women held in little regard...
|
Religion poisons everything.
|
I believe this has nothing to do with religion. It is a matter of culture. Bad nonetheless. To the people mentioning Middle East learn you geography first. From when Afghanistan belongs to Middle East?
|
this is another great example of why i am ALL for their fanaticism and proclivity for suicide bombing. that combined with the general disdain for women and the lack of women being raised to maturity in that region means that for them, their deathrate will soon be higher than their birthrate. which im ok with. self imposed genocide through idiocy
|
On November 24 2011 04:40 Art.FeeL wrote: I believe this has nothing to do with religion. It is a matter of culture. Bad nonetheless. To the people mentioning Middle East learn you geography first. From when Afghanistan belongs to Middle East?
Afghanistan is under Islamic law.
|
On November 24 2011 04:21 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +On what basis can you make that claim? We dont have written history without religion, so we dont really know what the world would be like without those two. How ever, we do have strongly secular countries that flat out ignore most of the religious teachings, and still country like finland has good justice system, woman president, prime minister, damn near free education to everybody and our poverty ratings are very low.
On the basis that it is what happened and the people and organizations responsible deserve credit for it. "Someone else woulda done it" isn't an argument against giving credit. Not a good one anyway. Finland and other "secular" countries, you are so proud of making claims like what you say, you act like Christianity has no relationship or connection to your culture, when almost 100% of your culture, including secularism, is a product of Christianity! It's very funny. Who do you think the first men were, who set the foundations for the intellectual development that resulted in things like secularism? Christians and Jews! Arguing first against Roman oppression and then Roman Catholic oppression. Where did the "secular" idea of critical analysis come from? Christians, who wanted to read the Bible for themselves in their own languages and decide for themselves what Christianity was about, not what the Catholic Church told them! Etc., etc., look. For a thousand or so years, Christianity and Islam were the only places around (outside of China) where you could go if you wanted to learn to read and write, learn mathematics, law, science, philosophy etc., such as they were. Learn the facts. The intellectual foundations of our whole society were rebuilt by religious men. In between the Greco-Roman era and the Renaissance, it's hard to find a European or Muslim great scientist or writer or thinker who was not driven at least in part in his quest for knowledge by his faith. Martin Luther is a good example, that Protestantism thing? That was religious you know. Reason and logic? Thomas Aquinas and others Muslim and Christian, using the writings of the old Greek philosophers to examine their religions and world to discover and understand "the glory of God's creation," as they viewed it.
Christianity is quick to claim credit for things that is just common sence or what it has nothing to do with.( When was the last time you heard someone thank god for something that doctor did for example? When was the last time people thanked god for having a nice singing voice? List goes on and on... ) It is the basic argument that without religion instructing how to live people would be running around raping and stealing from their neighbors.( as if that didnt happen, HAH! ) Christianitys reign was such a bad time for the people that it is no wonder that people started to look for alternatives. Thanking christianity for that is like thanking the rapist for showing everybody around the world just how badly they treat women there. If anything, christianity stopped the work that was began by the civilizations that preceded them, such as greeks.
Its more likely that human and its ancestors learned long before we started writing - or even started walking - that team work and strong societies are good thing, whitch is all that evolution needs to start hardwiring people community behaviour. Since stealing, raping and murdering are bad for community, its only natural that evolution would favor the ones that could sence the injustice in such behaviour. Treating others well is common sence, and while there are people who cannot feel this sence of justice, that dosent mean that they would follow these rules even if it was written on a silly book either.
|
Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations.
|
On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations. Oh, she was only put in jail because she was having an extramarital affair? That's okay then.
ARE YOU TRIPPING SON
|
I can't even fathom words for this.
|
On November 24 2011 04:27 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:23 LlOoKkIi wrote:On November 24 2011 04:17 IamBach wrote: wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation It may not in the US but other counties actually value the sanctity of a marriage especially countries that hold religion in such high regard. Never understood why someone would have an affair, if you hate your spouse so much just get a divorce then you can start a new relationship with this other person. People are so impatient. Yeah, if a Muslim woman doesn't like her spouse, she'll just divorce him. That's exactly how it works.
That is how it works, according to Islam.
Religion and culture are 2 different things.
|
On November 24 2011 05:06 Dr_Ze wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:27 kafkaesque wrote:On November 24 2011 04:23 LlOoKkIi wrote:On November 24 2011 04:17 IamBach wrote: wow having an affair doesn't warrant jail... its a personal thing. Religion+Government = human rights violation It may not in the US but other counties actually value the sanctity of a marriage especially countries that hold religion in such high regard. Never understood why someone would have an affair, if you hate your spouse so much just get a divorce then you can start a new relationship with this other person. People are so impatient. Yeah, if a Muslim woman doesn't like her spouse, she'll just divorce him. That's exactly how it works. That is how it works, according to Islam. Religion and culture are 2 different things. Yep: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divorce#Islam
In 15th century Egypt, Al-Sakhawi recorded the marital history of 500 women, the largest sample on marriage in the Middle Ages, and found that at least a third of all women in the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and Syria married more than once, with many marrying three or more times. According to Al-Sakhawi, as many as three out of ten marriages in 15th century Cairo ended in divorce. In the early 20th century, some villages in western Java and the Malay peninsula had divorce rates as high as 70%. Meanwhile Catholic Church never allowed divorce without a special authorization from the Pope or its delegate which is fucking hard to get. Actually, my mother got one, she is divorced by the Catholic Church (how cool is that?)
|
On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations.
What in the...
Even if that was the case, wich it isn't, she still doesn't belong in jail.
What the fuck...seriously TL? There shouldn't even be one person advocating locking people up for cheating and now we have two?
|
What the ****? This is so stupid, the world needs to change.
|
On November 24 2011 05:12 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations. What in the... Even if that was the case, wich it isn't, she still doesn't belong in jail. What the fuck...seriously TL? There shouldn't even be one person advocating locking people up for cheating and now we have two? He actually never said she should be jailed, just that the story is not the way it is presented.
The fact that adultery get a woman to jail in Afghanistan or wherever is not new. Actually, under the reign of Taliban she would have been stoned.
Don't know which to believe all of that is retarded anyway
|
On November 23 2011 20:35 NeonFox wrote: This world sickens me sometimes. the world is not a bad place, it holds many beauties not man made, the people have to change. it is sad yes. will the change ever come? who knows. 2011 years down, many more to go!
edit: man made, i wrote mad mane lol
|
I'm no longer surprised by these kind of backwards laws in the middle east (and sometimes other regions to be fair). This is what happens when governments are non-secular and cultures are tied up in religion. Outdated and irrational rules are allowed to prevail.
Though it occurs at a much weaker degree, there are still examples of this ignorance masked by religion in first world countries as well...cough cough America.
|
Wow, what the fuck? This is Sharia isn't it (pardon me if I'm wrong)? Pretty disgusting stuff. Can't believe she got thrown into jail for getting raped. Not trying to shit on their religion and culture, but I definitely don't agree with what they did.
|
horrible thing to hear about but not really surprising. There is a reason why the middle east has gotten a stereotyping of being insane
|
"Standard".
Shit like that happens often, and the rapist doesn't always get convicted. It's revolting every time, but I wish I could still be surprised by this. Sadly, that's how things work there. Sometimes I feel like all hope is lost for my society, other times I feel like all hope is lost for others.
On November 24 2011 05:16 Biff The Understudy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:12 zalz wrote:On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations. What in the... Even if that was the case, wich it isn't, she still doesn't belong in jail. What the fuck...seriously TL? There shouldn't even be one person advocating locking people up for cheating and now we have two? He actually never said she should be jailed, just that the story is not the way it is presented. His little story is ridiculous. "Let's commit adultery and then we'll TELL EVERYONE: it's brilliant because everybody loses". What are the odds of that... The only way that can happen is if they got caught cheating and they improvised something which makes no sense.
|
Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus
|
Roflcopter @ the bronze age still existing in 21C. Astonishing.
|
On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus
Do you recall 9/11?
|
On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities.
The most ignorant thing I have ever read... Do you understand what the Crusades were? How many countless homosexuals have been killed by Christians in America because of their religion. The KKK. World War 2, Hitler doing "gods work"? 9/11? Catholics lying about condoms CAUSING AIDS and as a result killing millions.
Less than 2 weeks ago a Christian terrorist tried to kill Obama in the name of God.
You need to educate yourself.
|
On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus
I honestly don't understand how people can still try and brush this off as not religion inspired and suggesting that it has nothing to do with religion.
Locking up the rape victim happens in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, it's very prevalent in the muslim world.
Ofcourse not every single muslim believes this stuff but you can't seriously suggest that this has nothing to do with islam.
|
Oh... Afghanistan. Well now that makes sense.
In a very illogical way. such shitty parts of the world people live in :-( sad sad sad
|
can anyone find the Afghanistan perspective on this? does anyone know if this is as disgusting over there as it is to us over here? or is it like another day in the judicial system to them like a drug addict getting 5 years for us. If people there actually think this is normal, i would really like to hear their perspective on how they think this is fair, moral, or even logical.
|
when i saw the op title, i immediately thought this was an article related to something in the middle east. after reading it was upsetting that my stereotype proved true.
|
But you have to respect peoples culture and beliefs right..............give me a break, Afghanistan makes me sick.
|
|
I live in the Middle East and have been coming here for 10+ years, so I know the attitude.
Stuff like this happens a fair bit, and it isn't too much to do with religion as it is the attitude of the people. There are some strictly religious based rulings made, for example, beating your wife is ok sometimes according to the religious law, althougth, and women being raped and it being 'their fault from bringing it on' is more just the attitude towards women, and not so much because their religion says it's ok.
|
On November 24 2011 05:41 arbitrageur wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus Do you recall 9/11? Do you remember the foreign policy of the US? It was pretty shitty
On November 24 2011 05:45 Ashworth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The most ignorant thing I have ever read... Do you understand what the Crusades were? How many countless homosexuals have been killed by Christians in America because of their religion. The KKK. World War 2, Hitler doing "gods work"? 9/11? Catholics lying about condoms CAUSING AIDS and as a result killing millions. Less than 2 weeks ago a Christian terrorist tried to kill Obama in the name of God. You need to educate yourself. I believe that the lack of education causes people to be bigoted, not religion. I have studied about this quite a bit. But of course it can be said that being uneducated makes you religious so *shrugs*
To say that it was simply religion all along just seems too...simple. The answer was so fucking obvious all along! Something about that seems wrong.
|
Well that's fucked up. I know very little about Middle Eastern culture, though, and it's sickening to think that this is a normal punishment there. Marry the person that raped you to get out of jail (for being a victim nonetheless)... that sure sounds appealing.
|
There is not much to say, this is sick and disgusting. Sigh.
|
On November 24 2011 05:49 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus I honestly don't understand how people can still try and brush this off as not religion inspired and suggesting that it has nothing to do with religion. Locking up the rape victim happens in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Saudi-Arabia, it's very prevalent in the muslim world. Ofcourse not every single muslim believes this stuff but you can't seriously suggest that this has nothing to do with islam. Well, the people are rather uneducated. I am not saying that religion has nothing to do with it and say it was economics which I use to believe. For example during the Crusades, the Italian merchants loaded their ships not with the riches of the Middle East, but rather dirt meant to bury those who died in Italy which had no monetary value but lots of spiritual value which still lacks any practical purpose.
And looking at the Khmer Rouge, I do not think it is religion, but rather an unhealthy obsession with an ideology whether it is Islam, Christianity, or Communism.
And looking at the brutality of the Soviets, they were secular and allowed equal rights for women. Perhaps it is far-left ideology that allowed this, maybe the lack of religion but they did things that were incredibly evil and brutal that it made many in Russia believe that all this happened because God was not there which I do not thing is true at all.
|
On November 24 2011 05:54 JiYan wrote: can anyone find the Afghanistan perspective on this? does anyone know if this is as disgusting over there as it is to us over here? or is it like another day in the judicial system to them like a drug addict getting 5 years for us. If people there actually think this is normal, i would really like to hear their perspective on how they think this is fair, moral, or even logical.
Afghanistan is a tribal society. There isn't really much of a concencus on anything because the very national identity of "Afghanistan" barely exists.
That said, overall if you could get someone to go door to door (or hut to hut i suppose) to poll the people you would find an overwhelming majority of the people voting yes. The women won't be allowd to vote, either their fathers, husbands or yes even their sons, will keep them "in line".
Women who are born in Afghanistan are treated as more or less livestock. Men herd the cattle that they hunger after and in the same fashion they control the women they lust after. They must wear a burqa and they are not allowed to follow an education.
A women born in Afghanistan will live and die whilst never hearing anything other then that she is inferior to a man. She will not even learn to read so she will never ever be able to break this brainwashing with enlightend literature. Her entire surrounding from men to fellow brainwashed women will tell her "this is normal, this is how it is supposed to be" and in due time she will tell her fellow Afghanistani women that this is how life is supposed to be.
Women in Afghanistan live in a society that tells them they only live to serve men and they will never learn to read and as such never be able to connect with the outside world and learn from other cultures.
Afghanistan is an example how an idiotic medieval culture can hold a country enslaved. The kind of brainwashing where the people are left begging for more.
|
|
On November 24 2011 05:41 arbitrageur wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus Do you recall 9/11? the americans have done far worse things to under developmentet countries.+that its ridiculous to judge a country/religon etc from 1 event
|
It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet.
|
Well, the people are rather uneducated. I am not saying that religion has nothing to do with it and say it was economics which I use to believe. For example during the Crusades, the Italian merchants loaded their ships not with the riches of the Middle East, but rather dirt meant to bury those who died in Italy.
And looking at the Khmer Rouge, I do not think it is religion, but rather an unhealthy obsession with an ideology whether it is Islam, Christianity, or Communism?
The question is not whether or not this is good or wrong. The question is, is this a perversion of the message?
There is a religion called Janism. This religion revolves completly around non-violence against all living things. If a Janist blows himself up in a busy market square killing a hundred people, he is obviously perverting the message.
If a capitalist demands that the state controls all means to production then he is obviously distorting the ideology.
If you kill an insane ammount of people then you are not distorting the ideology of communism. One of the largest problems with communism is that it advocates the expulsion of the captialist class but it never defines how to deal with those that disagree with the communist message. Communism is not a system that allows people to not take part in it. You can live in a capitalist society and be a socialist. You can't live in a communist society and be a capitalist, the system only works if everyone takes part. The communist doctrine never acknowledges how to get rid of these elements. Do you ban them? Do you kill them? That is left up for personal reading.
Now we come down to the crux of the debate, islam. When throwing women in jail that are raped, are they acting against islam, the teachings of islam and the doctrine of islam?
The answer is no, they are not. They are acting in accordance to their religion. Some people will argue a different reading but you cannot deny that their reading is as valid as any other. It is not like the case with the Janist that is doing a direct 180 on the beliefs.
So it is not a group of people that are following a perverted version of islam. Just a group of people following a different but valid reading of islam. As such the faith of islam can be held accountable because it preaches this behaviour.
|
On November 24 2011 05:59 FJ wrote: I live in the Middle East and have been coming here for 10+ years, so I know the attitude.
Stuff like this happens a fair bit, and it isn't too much to do with religion as it is the attitude of the people. There are some strictly religious based rulings made, for example, beating your wife is ok sometimes according to the religious law, althougth, and women being raped and it being 'their fault from bringing it on' is more just the attitude towards women, and not so much because their religion says it's ok. their is even EU countries that think it is ok to hit shilds for raising them,so i can understand your opinion a little but in many parts of the world stuff like this happened and lets not forget that the attidude towards women come from years of religion
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
I don't quite understand, are you saying we shouldn't try to make everyone a better human, including ourselves? Or are you saying "hypocrites!", just because we have problems that are similar but not on the same scale, we shouldn't fix those incorrections?
I have a hard time agreeing with that.
|
On November 24 2011 06:17 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +Well, the people are rather uneducated. I am not saying that religion has nothing to do with it and say it was economics which I use to believe. For example during the Crusades, the Italian merchants loaded their ships not with the riches of the Middle East, but rather dirt meant to bury those who died in Italy.
And looking at the Khmer Rouge, I do not think it is religion, but rather an unhealthy obsession with an ideology whether it is Islam, Christianity, or Communism? The question is not whether or not this is good or wrong. The question is, is this a perversion of the message? There is a religion called Janism. This religion revolves completly around non-violence against all living things. If a Janist blows himself up in a busy market square killing a hundred people, he is obviously perverting the message. If a capitalist demands that the state controls all means to production then he is obviously distorting the ideology. If you kill an insane ammount of people then you are not distorting the ideology of communism. One of the largest problems with communism is that it advocates the expulsion of the captialist class but it never defines how to deal with those that disagree with the communist message. Communism is not a system that allows people to not take part in it. You can live in a capitalist society and be a socialist. You can't live in a communist society and be a capitalist, the system only works if everyone takes part. The communist doctrine never acknowledges how to get rid of these elements. Do you ban them? Do you kill them? That is left up for personal reading. Now we come down to the crux of the debate, islam. When throwing women in jail that are raped, are they acting against islam, the teachings of islam and the doctrine of islam? The answer is no, they are not. They are acting in accordance to their religion. Some people will argue a different reading but you cannot deny that their reading is as valid as any other. It is not like the case with the Janist that is doing a direct 180 on the beliefs. So it is not a group of people that are following a perverted version of islam. Just a group of people following a different but valid reading of islam. As such the faith of islam can be held accountable because it preaches this behaviour. Yes, I agree with you 100 percent. But I know female Muslims and gay Muslims who use the Quaran to justify their rights, just as there are Christian women and Christian gays who use the Bible to prove that God does not hate them and they make very strong points. So in that context, you are absolutely right, but my experience with these women and homosexuals is that the text can be twisted in such a manner that it can tolerate anything and condemn anything.
And as for Communism, I do not think many of them would say that a mass genocide is what Marx would have wanted but that is a different story.
|
On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet.
Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp.
>_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought.
|
Being female in afghanistan must be so harsh, especially with crap like this. Unbelievable sometimes
|
On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought.
The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years.
It's never going to unless other countries force it to.
|
On November 23 2011 20:38 Gnial wrote: Upon reading more closely, he was in fact convicted of rape. And the incarceration of the victim is a regular practice, apparently, which is terrible.
And completly illogical. Imagine if this played out on NA soil, the public backlash could topple a government.
|
On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. it took many countries like more than it takes them to change now for example sweden took like 300 years before it became (moderate justified)but lets remember that those countries are still unadvanced in tech compared to us so they are actually changing way faster then us as they did more in 10 years than many did in 100
|
On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to.
The middle-east has actually changed a great deal in the span of a 1000 years. I don't see any reason why someone would claim that the middle-east has not changed.
I would argue that it has changed for the worse. Where it was once the pinacle of human society at the time it has since fallen to be one of the worst.
|
On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus They aren't real christians, then. That's the relativist/cafeteria style morality. Pick some nice parts and throw the rest of the book out. Yes, religion makes people do bad things. You really don't think Islam had anything to do with this? People say not to judge a religion by its extremists. I don't need to, I judge it by its texts.
|
There might be religious of sociological aspects that wasnt made clear in the article. I think someone from with more knowledge about the muslim way of life to elaborate on this.
|
This is fucking stupid. I can't even express how mad I am about this... its just madness..:S
|
On November 24 2011 04:51 bonifaceviii wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations. Oh, she was only put in jail because she was having an extramarital affair? That's okay then. ARE YOU TRIPPING SON
I believe that the man should be punished too. I believe that marriage is like a contract, and breaking it is a violation of that contract. It is equivalent to breaking the law and is fully punishable.
|
On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to. Actually the middle east used to be one of the most educated and intelligent places in the world. They saved the writings of Plato, Aristotle and others from what was happening in Europe. They invented the number zero, algebra, the algorithm. You may be right it hasn't changed much in a thousand years, but it used to be quite civilized.
|
On November 24 2011 06:28 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus They aren't real christians, then. That's the relativist/cafeteria style morality. Pick some nice parts and throw the rest of the book out. Yes, religion makes people do bad things. You really don't think Islam had anything to do with this? People say not to judge a religion by its extremists. I don't need to, I judge it by its texts. To not call them christians because they "pick some nice parts and throw the rest" is contradictory when you yourself lump the bad parts of the bible and call them christian.
|
On November 24 2011 06:32 ore0z wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:28 Roe wrote:On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus They aren't real christians, then. That's the relativist/cafeteria style morality. Pick some nice parts and throw the rest of the book out. Yes, religion makes people do bad things. You really don't think Islam had anything to do with this? People say not to judge a religion by its extremists. I don't need to, I judge it by its texts. To not call them christians because they "pick some nice parts and throw the rest" is contradictory when you yourself lump the bad parts of the bible and call them christian. The irony is at your expense.
|
On November 24 2011 06:31 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to. Actually the middle east used to be one of the most educated and intelligent places in the world. They saved the writings of Plato, Aristotle and others from what was happening in Europe. They invented the number zero, algebra, the algorithm. You may be right it hasn't changed much in a thousand years, but it used to be quite civilized. for the most part....the middle east is exactly the same as any western country. its just extreme countries like afghanistan that invent their own version of islam and make the entire part of the world look like crap.
|
On November 23 2011 23:41 KryptoStorm wrote: Religion does nothing but ruin the world.
Maybe one day we will be without it.
Replace Religion with Extremists.
I'm not a spiritual person but my mother and my girlfriend have been through very tough times with nothing to hang on to but their faith. Religion servers its purpose for good but others also use it for evil, as cheesy as this may sound.
|
On November 24 2011 06:32 ore0z wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:28 Roe wrote:On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus They aren't real christians, then. That's the relativist/cafeteria style morality. Pick some nice parts and throw the rest of the book out. Yes, religion makes people do bad things. You really don't think Islam had anything to do with this? People say not to judge a religion by its extremists. I don't need to, I judge it by its texts. To not call them christians because they "pick some nice parts and throw the rest" is contradictory when you yourself lump the bad parts of the bible and call them christian. But it's true. They are "moderate" Christians, not serious Christians. Moderates are people who don't take their religion as seriously as the fundamentalists. A religion, and indeed any belief system, should damned well be judged by both its texts and its extremists. Extremism just means that the person is consistent with their beliefs.
Being a moderately religious person is not in itself a good thing. The reason moderates are good is because they mix some reason into their irrationality and accept such good concepts as reason, rights, and separation between church and state. So the less religious a person is, the better. Moderation is only better than extremism if it's a horrible belief that is being taken in moderation.
Islam deserves to be bashed, along with the people who practice it the most consistently and do these things, and the countries that make Sharia the law of their land and commit atrocities like this against their own people. The only good Muslim is a moderate one who truly desires peace, condemns his fundamentalist (consistent), violent counterparts, and does not want Sharia to be made into law.
|
On November 24 2011 06:35 hytonight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:31 Roe wrote:On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to. Actually the middle east used to be one of the most educated and intelligent places in the world. They saved the writings of Plato, Aristotle and others from what was happening in Europe. They invented the number zero, algebra, the algorithm. You may be right it hasn't changed much in a thousand years, but it used to be quite civilized. for the most part....the middle east is exactly the same as any western country. its just extreme countries like afghanistan that invent their own version of islam and make the entire part of the world look like crap.
The middle-east is in no way "the same" as "any western country".
When it comes to human rights they are still a great deal behind of western countries.
When it comes to science they are still a great deal behind of western countries.
When it comes to economies they are massively behind of western countries.
I can't think of any real pillar of society in wich the middle-east is even the equall to the western world.
|
On November 24 2011 06:28 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:28 Shiragaku wrote: Well it may be in the Quar'an, but I do not think that religion makes people commit such atrocities. The Bible in the Old Testament said to kill women who were raped, women were suppose to marry their rapists, women were not suppose to talk at the table, and there are too many Christians I know that do not support any of these, in fact quite the opposite. So please do not bash Islam.
And yes, people use the Sharia for horrible things, but people have used it for wonderful things. For example, Muhammad Yunus They aren't real christians, then. That's the relativist/cafeteria style morality. Pick some nice parts and throw the rest of the book out. Yes, religion makes people do bad things. You really don't think Islam had anything to do with this? People say not to judge a religion by its extremists. I don't need to, I judge it by its texts. And like I said, there are many people who take the texts to prove that homosexuality is not a sin by throwing out the Old Testament since much of it already contradicts much of the New. But that is not to say that the New Testament is love and fun...
And about the Middle East not changing for a thousand years, I would say there is little change from the 1800s. Judging from the documents from the Crusades, the Islamic nations seemed to have viewed the Christians more as invaders that want to rival their power like their Muslim neighbors than anything really. It was not until the 1800s when we started seeing the religious rhetoric used to condemn colonialism by the Europeans and then they started using the Crusades as part of their rhetoric.
|
On November 24 2011 06:42 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:35 hytonight wrote:On November 24 2011 06:31 Roe wrote:On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to. Actually the middle east used to be one of the most educated and intelligent places in the world. They saved the writings of Plato, Aristotle and others from what was happening in Europe. They invented the number zero, algebra, the algorithm. You may be right it hasn't changed much in a thousand years, but it used to be quite civilized. for the most part....the middle east is exactly the same as any western country. its just extreme countries like afghanistan that invent their own version of islam and make the entire part of the world look like crap. The middle-east is in no way "the same" as "any western country". When it comes to human rights they are still a great deal behind of western countries. When it comes to science they are still a great deal behind of western countries. When it comes to economies they are massively behind of western countries. I can't think of any real pillar of society in wich the middle-east is even the equall to the western world. Correct. Although Israel is the exception. That country does equal and in some ways exceed the western world a little bit.
|
On November 24 2011 06:42 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:35 hytonight wrote:On November 24 2011 06:31 Roe wrote:On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to. Actually the middle east used to be one of the most educated and intelligent places in the world. They saved the writings of Plato, Aristotle and others from what was happening in Europe. They invented the number zero, algebra, the algorithm. You may be right it hasn't changed much in a thousand years, but it used to be quite civilized. for the most part....the middle east is exactly the same as any western country. its just extreme countries like afghanistan that invent their own version of islam and make the entire part of the world look like crap. The middle-east is in no way "the same" as "any western country". When it comes to human rights they are still a great deal behind of western countries. When it comes to science they are still a great deal behind of western countries. When it comes to economies they are massively behind of western countries. I can't think of any real pillar of society in wich the middle-east is even the equall to the western world. ive been there.......hows the science different? they arent a bunch of cavemen throwing shit at each other... human rights...only in the fucked up countries which arent anywhere near as common as people like to think. economics...they arent exactly superpowers, but they arent poor.
|
And we support many of the dictators in the Middle East so that seems to play a role in why the Middle East may not have been able to advance as quickly as we would like it to.
|
On November 23 2011 21:03 Telcontar wrote: This just makes me sick. It just shows how privileged we are not to have been born to a severely twisted and outdated culture like that.
What makes you able to judge a culture as inferior to yours?
+ Show Spoiler +just kidding 
|
On November 23 2011 21:12 Ryndika wrote: There is so different moral codes around the world. :O What can I say? I feel REALLY bad for that person... ;( I hope she will get better life soon enough. I'm having a hard time believing that unfortunately...
|
How long does she have to make up her mind? Shes fucked wither way though, i think stay in jail and keep family support is the better route
|
On November 24 2011 06:49 hytonight wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 06:42 zalz wrote:On November 24 2011 06:35 hytonight wrote:On November 24 2011 06:31 Roe wrote:On November 24 2011 06:23 SafeAsCheese wrote:On November 24 2011 06:22 Hittomogasin wrote:On November 24 2011 06:14 SafeAsCheese wrote: It's insane when you compare a city like Tokyo or Seoul or NYC to Paris to a country like Afghanistan
It's like certain areas of the world just cannot "advance". Be it culture or religion holding them back.
The only way to fix that sort of problem is a total invasion of that nation and forced institutionalization, but no country in the world has the right to do that yet. Ya, lets solve violence with more violence. Derp. >_> Attacking them would only make muslim world more agressive. Maybe in future more irrational groups get their hands on some nuclear weapons and force the hand of western/eastern powers. Its a grim thought. The middle east has barely changed in the last thousand years. It's never going to unless other countries force it to. Actually the middle east used to be one of the most educated and intelligent places in the world. They saved the writings of Plato, Aristotle and others from what was happening in Europe. They invented the number zero, algebra, the algorithm. You may be right it hasn't changed much in a thousand years, but it used to be quite civilized. for the most part....the middle east is exactly the same as any western country. its just extreme countries like afghanistan that invent their own version of islam and make the entire part of the world look like crap. The middle-east is in no way "the same" as "any western country". When it comes to human rights they are still a great deal behind of western countries. When it comes to science they are still a great deal behind of western countries. When it comes to economies they are massively behind of western countries. I can't think of any real pillar of society in wich the middle-east is even the equall to the western world. ive been there.......hows the science different? they arent a bunch of cavemen throwing shit at each other... human rights...only in the fucked up countries which arent anywhere near as common as people like to think. economics...they arent exactly superpowers, but they arent poor.
Well the science is a bit of an abstract. You could measure it in education, you could measure it in the presence of high tech products (smart phones for example), you could measure it in the sheer ammount of scientific discoveries from the region. In all categories they would fall short of a western nation.
Human rights are horrible all across the middle-east. I don't see how you can really argue that. Even something as basic as freedom of speech isn't a fact in that region.
Their economies are almost all largely based on oil sales. Those aren't healthy economies. Even with oil their economies are weaker then western economies so that would still mean they are below the western standard.
I ain't saying that the middle-east is a hellhole (although i wouldn't want to live in it) but to suggest that it is the equall to the western world is just delusional and goes against all facts.
|
If you read on, the article goes to say that if she gets out of jail by marrying her rapist, she will be in danger from her attacker's family because of their "shame".
This comes to mind "if a man happens to meet a virgin woman who is not engaged to be married, and he seizes her and rapes her, but is caught in the act, the rapist must pay the girls father fifty silver shekels. She must marry the rapist, because he has violated her. And as long as he lives. He may not divorce her" Deutoronomy 22:28-29
|
idontwanttoliveonthisworldanymore.jpg
But seriously, this is disgusting. There is absolutely no logic in these laws - I can't believe that there is no "willing" within the law of having sex without being married. And to top it off, the man isn't even being charged? Also, people over there are so unsympathetic that if she marries her rapist in order to avoid 12 years in jail she will be shamed by her own family? What has this world come to (or parts of it)....
|
On November 24 2011 06:59 FinestHour wrote: How long does she have to make up her mind? Shes fucked wither way though, i think stay in jail and keep family support is the better route
Family honour is incredibly important in societies like Afghanistan.
Her family most likely hates her at this point.
This seems incredibly alien but the difference in culture is insane between people in Afghanistan and people here on TeamLiquid.
Nobody on this forum could imagine feeling anything other then empathy for their sister if she was raped. It doesn't work like that in these societies. She has put disgrace on her family. The only thing women are expected to do in Afghanistan is not bring shame to their family.
Hell we can't even understand how any of this would bring shame to her family but that is how they reason in those cultures.
She shouldn't expect any sympathy from her family. As i said earlier, they probably hate her.
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. I... I don't even know...
What are you trying to say? No matter how hard you try, you cannot deny that the woman got raped and then blamed for it (and that is not morally right) . It is almost as you're trying to defend the rapist.
|
Seems to me a great shame that Judges can be so lacking in judgement as to be unable to discern a difference between what a person has done and what has been done to a person against their will.
Not being a Muslim I can't be certain; but I thought that it would be perfectly obvious to someone who has read and meditated on the Quran that Allah does not take the sin of one (the rapist) and place it on another (the raped).
The issue is then, to my mind, cultural and not religious.
|
This is what happens when you take your laws from a book written in the middle ages (or whenever the last major changes to the Quran took place)
Maybe that's a bit insensitive, but it really seems the root of the problem to me. Law should be malleable and change with the society, but when you use strict religious law it ignores any practical changes that should have been made since that time. Its this sort of thing that scares me when I look how much religion pops up in American politics.
|
On November 24 2011 05:12 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations. What in the... Even if that was the case, wich it isn't, she still doesn't belong in jail. What the fuck...seriously TL? There shouldn't even be one person advocating locking people up for cheating and now we have two?
I have some concerns about the various assumptions the article and various posters seem to hold and how they take the woman's claim at face value.
How do you know for certain it was not a false rape accusation? The article is dead silent about any kind of evidence - DNA samples, bruises, torn clothes, camera footage, witnesses, anything that would support her claim that she was indeed raped, as opposed to having consensual sex or no contact at all (no, her testimony worth exactly 0 in these kind of cases). If none of these are found or presented, presumption of innocence stands.
Furthermore, if the police suspects she is lying due to inconsistencies in her testimony or she changes the latter to fit new evidence, then yes, she does belong in jail for bearing false witness in a criminal case, trying to ruin the life and reputation of an innocent, and wasting massive amounts of taxpayer money. For a comparison, it would be absurd if she accused someone of murder (despite the victim being alive and well) and got away scot-free, ready to repeat it again. It would create dangerous precedent to say the least.
Bar a mistaken identity which I don't think is applicable in this case, there can be only two scenarios: 1) the man really raped her or 2) she made up the story for whatever mundane reasons like too many woman. Either way, one of them belongs in jail, for several years.
The attitude of islam about rape (and in general) sucks yes, but I suspect there is more going on in the back stage than what we see, it smells like they tried to charge her for something else but could only managed this one, I've read about such occurences. If I'm mistaken, then the United States did a particularly crappy job at shooting up the country.
But the US along with Sweden sucks even more when it comes to handling false rape accusations. Among others, presumption of innocence and due process dies first when a man is accused of sexual crimes. I actually prefer that aspect of islam where they need 4 witnesses in rape cases (sans with all the religious crap of course) instead of just taking the biased testimony of the alleged victim at face value, even in presence of contradicting evidence, often suppressed by district attorneys. Both are absurd, but the latter does much more damage.
Oh right, this shit also happens in the United States. One example where the husband raped his wife, she divorced him, then she was forced to pay alimony for being higher paid. Another example is where a woman fucked an underage boy, which is legally statutory rape, got pregnant, and when he hit the 18 mark, was forced to provide child support or face jail where his debt would only accumulate forever.
|
On November 24 2011 08:04 Frigo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 05:12 zalz wrote:On November 24 2011 04:50 aztrorisk wrote: Before you guys start hating the Afghanistan government, please be aware that you do not know the whole story.
What if it was a mutual consensus to have an affair and the women lied about what happened after she found out that she was pregnant. If you have ever read To Kill a Mockingbird, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
Don't be so quick to judge because CNN will often make bias reports to make the US look better compared to other nations. What in the... Even if that was the case, wich it isn't, she still doesn't belong in jail. What the fuck...seriously TL? There shouldn't even be one person advocating locking people up for cheating and now we have two? I have some concerns about the various assumptions the article and various posters seem to hold and how they take the woman's claim at face value. How do you know for certain it was not a false rape accusation? The article is dead silent about any kind of evidence - DNA samples, bruises, torn clothes, camera footage, witnesses, anything that would support her claim that she was indeed raped, as opposed to having consensual sex or no contact at all (no, her testimony worth exactly 0 in these kind of cases). If none of these are found or presented, presumption of innocence stands. Furthermore, if the police suspects she is lying due to inconsistencies in her testimony or she changes the latter to fit new evidence, then yes, she does belong in jail for bearing false witness in a criminal case, trying to ruin the life and reputation of an innocent, and wasting massive amounts of taxpayer money. For a comparison, it would be absurd if she accused someone of murder (despite the victim being alive and well) and got away scot-free, ready to repeat it again. It would create dangerous precedent to say the least. Bar a mistaken identity which I don't think is applicable in this case, there can be only two scenarios: 1) the man really raped her or 2) she made up the story for whatever mundane reasons like too many woman. Either way, one of them belongs in jail, for several years. The attitude of islam about rape (and in general) sucks yes, but I suspect there is more going on in the back stage than what we see, it smells like they tried to charge her for something else but could only managed this one. If I'm mistaken, then the United States did a particularly crappy job at shooting up the country. But the US along with Sweden sucks even more when it comes to handling false rape accusations. Among others, presumption of innocence and due process dies first when a man is accused of sexual crimes. I actually prefer that aspect of islam where they need 4 witnesses in rape cases (sans with all the religious crap of course) instead of just taking the biased testimony of the alleged victim at face value, even in presence of contradicting evidence, often suppressed by district attorneys. Both are absurd, but the latter does much more damage. Oh right, this shit also happens in the United States. One example where the husband raped his wife, she divorced him, then she was forced to pay alimony for being higher paid. Another example is where a woman fucked an underage boy, which is legally statutory rape, got pregnant, and when he hit the 18 mark, was forced to provide child support or face jail where his debt would only accumulate forever.
None of what you said changes the fact that under a strict interpretation of Afghan law, you can go to prison for being raped, which makes the rest of your post entirely moot. There's no point to speculating whether she faked it or not, because the case serves as an example of what CAN happen with a rape victim in Afghanistan.
The fact that there are problems with the legal system in other countries doesn't make the Afghan case more just either, but at least over here it leads to a discussion on the legal system where it is perceived as a problem instead of being accepted as the norm. Also, requiring 4(!!!) witnesses for rape cases (which have to be male also) is utterly ridiculous, simply because most rapes happen without any witnesses at all. To require 4 witnesses is to effectively never prosecute anyone for rape ever again.
And honestly, talking about DNA, bruises, torn clothes in a 2 year old case in a country that's closer to the stone age then the 21st century isn't exactly realistic. Not to mention that if you get raped in the Arab world in the first place, you have a better shot never coming forward then actually trying to get the perpetrator framed, which we should all agree on is a terrible starting position for victims.
Trying to defend this particular part of the Afghan legal system is utterly ridiculous. There are moral absolutes and integrity of your own body is one of them.
|
On November 24 2011 07:51 sheaRZerg wrote: This is what happens when you take your laws from a book written in the middle ages (or whenever the last major changes to the Quran took place)
Maybe that's a bit insensitive, but it really seems the root of the problem to me. Law should be malleable and change with the society, but when you use strict religious law it ignores any practical changes that should have been made since that time. Its this sort of thing that scares me when I look how much religion pops up in American politics.
Agree completly. Imposing laws based in the middle ages in a society without considering if these laws are actually just and/or moral is just strange. Not that i can relate to the culture in afghanistan, but i feel that the backlash of these countries are in part due to intelectual and cultural halts after the 1500s (In the middle ages i would argue that it was better to live in the middle east though).
In addition, the fact that the west or anyone else have not reacted to these practises is horribly ignorant and outright imoral. Personally i think we need something like the nurnberg trials to make the people responsible pay for their crimes.
No matter how different the culture is, one cannot with any rational moral thoughts justify a law that allows for the imprisonment when there is no will or action from the prisoner.
The views on what is considered actions is quite different though. If i am not mistaken, muslims often believe that it is womens own fault for being raped because they dress tempting or something (thats what they say where i live at least, norway). Maybe the girl have showed her ancle or something :D to the guy in the past and therefore the legal system will put the guilt on the woman. This is still a quite flawed way of thinking since in most of the world men are able to controll themselfes when faced with hundreds of light dressed women all day, Maybe then it is just the public opinion that needs changes for the betterment of gender equality and globalisation(hmm).
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: `Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce".
Really?? divorce is now worse than jailing women for being raped?? What the fuck is wrong with people?????
|
On November 24 2011 07:51 sheaRZerg wrote: This is what happens when you take your laws from a book written in the middle ages (or whenever the last major changes to the Quran took place)
Maybe that's a bit insensitive, but it really seems the root of the problem to me. Law should be malleable and change with the society, but when you use strict religious law it ignores any practical changes that should have been made since that time. Its this sort of thing that scares me when I look how much religion pops up in American politics.
This is what happens when people have absolutely no clue what they are talking about, please go over the Quran and explain to me at any point without distorting context that any law interpreted makes it ok for women to be jailed for being rapes, Actually it is quite the contrary and any person raping a woman technically suffers very severe punishment, but the fact of the matter is the laws in place are set by people with politic's and power agenda's and that distorts everything. Easy scapegoat Quran is evil, Islam is evil.
This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the nature of society in the country, the same thing is pretty common where I am from, its pretty disgusting but the issues here are alot more complex than "omg what a savage society"
"o noes they have no womens rights". Ofcourse that doesnt make it alright but condemning it is only the first step. Its very easy to call bad things bad without understanding why they happen.
Lack of education, food, civic services, law and order. These things cause a society to degenerate. Religious or any other sort of corruption will only come to the fore in the absence of these.
Now look at the US, they have all of these things and the best of them, yet you have issues of racism and bigotry. Heck you only let women vote sometime this century after hundreds of years. Its very easy to sit on a pedestal and criticize young countries that are put under the kosh marred by conflict and foreign intervention never letting them progress while allowing them to survive and be influenced by the dollars given by those with horrid interpretations of Islam (hint hint Saudi Arabia, guess where they get there $'s from) the Quran whatever you want to call it. Im not religious at all, the idea of religion is pretty unnecessary to me personally but that doesnt make religion a bad thing. But in all my years of studying its really just people make it a bad thing, and anything even something considered universally infallible as democracy can be a bad thing if corrupted. You are seeing it now just take a look at the republican primaries.
The rot in theses societies is very deep and it isnt just limited to womens rights, its across the board in every aspect of their functioning. It will take a very long time and a very different approach to the current one but it doesnt matter because the current approach serves foreign interests. They arent there to change the society, thats to hard and time consuming. they have their own agendas to serve and it doesnt matter how its done as long as its easy which is fine.
The modern european and American sensibility simply cannon fathom or process these things properly so the reasonable thing is to just condemn on an internet forum tell your friends and just assume everyone from there is like that, and they get whatevers coming to them. Kudos.
On November 24 2011 08:23 Teoman wrote: The views on what is considered actions is quite different though. If i am not mistaken, muslims often believe that it is womens own fault for being raped because they dress tempting or something (thats what they say where i live at least, norway). Maybe the girl have showed her ancle or something :D to the guy in the past and therefore the legal system will put the guilt on the woman.
yes you are quite mistaken, idiots believe this, calling them Muslim is like calling priests who rape little boys Christians, would you ? I wouldnt.
|
On November 24 2011 07:51 sheaRZerg wrote: This is what happens when you take your laws from a book written in the middle ages (or whenever the last major changes to the Quran took place)
Maybe that's a bit insensitive, but it really seems the root of the problem to me. Law should be malleable and change with the society, but when you use strict religious law it ignores any practical changes that should have been made since that time. Its this sort of thing that scares me when I look how much religion pops up in American politics. That's why the bulk of Muslim cultures combined religious law with secular and interpretive law (Madhabs or Kanun). Even in the early days of the Caliphates, schools of law wouldn't directly adhere to what was written in the Quran and Hadith - the texts pertaining to law were written extremely harsh, quite possibly to act as a powerful deterrent.
Then, you get the more recent non-tolerant Muslim societies, which do things like this.
|
On November 24 2011 08:31 s4life wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: `Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". Really?? divorce is now worse than jailing women for being raped?? What the fuck is wrong with people?????
When you start allowing people to act in any way they please because "thats their belief/thats their culture/etc..." you enter a very dangerous realm. I agree that laws pertaining to inconsequential things can very based on culture, but there needs to be a moral standard, so that those being mistreated in such a vile manner have someone to help them. If this news wasnt spread, and we allowed them to carry on, she would be silently subject to this unwarrented punishment. With the negative reaction to this event, there is the opportunity for pressure of pleasing the global community to aid this woman.
Furthermore, when you allow people to treat others disgustingly based on their groups beliefs, when do you stop classifying people as groups, and when can you begin imposing basic morality on them? The fact is, the world is no longer isolated. Globalization has occured. We have advanced in many ways, and we realize that these archaic ideas are no longer appropriate. We need to work on making the world a better place for people, instead of sitting idley by and accepting this disgusting treatment of others because "its their culture".
|
On November 24 2011 08:52 Rebs wrote: This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the nature of society in the country, the same thing is pretty common where I am from, its pretty disgusting but the issues here are alot more complex than "omg what a savage society"
This has everything to do with religion friend. Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs. The problem with these beliefs is that you don't need to explain them logically or rationally, it's a jump made in the dark to an even darker place... hopefully your society will someday outgrow religion, at least to the same degree western cultures did w.r.t. catholic religion in the middle ages.
Edit: to the poster above me.. I think you misquoted me.
|
I'm confused. How could it be that
1. He is guilty of raping her, and 2. She is guilty of adultery
at the same time?
EDIT: brain fart, he hasn't been found guilty yet; article doesn't even seem to say that this offense is what he's in jail for.
EDIT 2: It's implied though:
CNN asked a spokesman for the prosecutor to comment on the case. The reply was that there were hundreds such cases and the office would need time to look into it.
|
On November 24 2011 09:28 s4life wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 08:52 Rebs wrote: This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the nature of society in the country, the same thing is pretty common where I am from, its pretty disgusting but the issues here are alot more complex than "omg what a savage society"
This has everything to do with religion friend. Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs. The problem with these beliefs is that you don't need to explain them logically or rationally, it's a jump made in the dark to an even darker place... hopefully your society will someday outgrow religion, at least to the same degree western cultures did w.r.t. catholic religion in the middle ages. Edit: to the poster above me.. I think you misquoted me.
Ooh, another "cool atheist kid".
Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs.
This is true. But you're missing a logical link. People can do this because of religion; but is this a religious problem in this case, or a problem of decentralized tribal conflict, politics, poverty, and drugs?
|
Ooh, another "cool atheist kid".
that's a good argument to counter his, right?
decentralized tribal conflict, politics, poverty, and drugs
those are all created by religion
|
Thread is so gone that I don't even need to come in and derail it with an inflammatory opinion!
|
On November 23 2011 20:38 Gnial wrote: I know people, women's rights groups in particular, hate it when you "blame the victim". While that isn't my intention, I know that is how this is often construed:
How do we know it was rape and not her having an affair?
Upon reading more closely, he was in fact convicted of rape. And the incarceration of the victim is a regular practice, apparently, which is terrible.
Dude, Shariah law is just that harsh.
|
|
On November 24 2011 09:28 s4life wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 08:52 Rebs wrote: This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the nature of society in the country, the same thing is pretty common where I am from, its pretty disgusting but the issues here are alot more complex than "omg what a savage society"
This has everything to do with religion friend. Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs. The problem with these beliefs is that you don't need to explain them logically or rationally, it's a jump made in the dark to an even darker place... hopefully your society will someday outgrow religion, at least to the same degree western cultures did w.r.t. catholic religion in the middle ages. Edit: to the poster above me.. I think you misquoted me.
Just bare in mind that correlation != causation.
A religious person can do monstrous stuff for reasons other than religion. If it was as simple as "Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs." then you would expect that religious people are generally doing this more than non-religious. Well in societies that aren't stuck in the middle ages, I doubt this is the case. For example, this isn't possible in the US. Not because people are less religious but because people and society as a whole is more educated, structured and there is a robust system of law.
People do monstrous things without religion. People do monstrous things with religion. It is how society deals with them that is different. It is easy to blame this stuff on religion, it just isn't always the cause. The fact that there are millions of muslims all over the world and this shit only happens in countries where societal structure has broken down, suggests to me that perhaps religion isn't the major cause for this behaviour.
|
your Country52797 Posts
So, being a victim gets you arrested? Some people disgust me.
|
Wow, things in Afghanistan have gotten so much better since it was liberated by the US.
|
On November 24 2011 10:53 tomatriedes wrote: Wow, things in Afghanistan have gotten so much better since it was liberated by the US. Where's the 'Like' button?
|
Didn't the future history of Starcraft teach that a world without religion is still ruled quite unfairly by those in power? Technically, that's fiction, but I know how popular the SC1 story/backstory is compared to SC2's.
People are completely kidding themselves if they think getting rid of religion will accomplish anything. You'll just be replacing the "evil" you know for one you think you don't, but it's in fact exactly the same thing, wearing another cloak.
It'll be the "religion of equality," or the "religion of green living," or more likely, something that benefits large corporations and screws you. Self interest will always cause strife. When religion is not the tool, it'll be something else.
But go on bashing religion, if it makes you feel better.
Props to JesusOurSavior for standing up for his beliefs, but don't think his is the only way Christianity is described, in brief or with longer explanations. It's the same poor assumption people are making about Muslims, atheists, and everyone else, for that matter. Not even gay people all have the same beliefs about why.
|
On November 23 2011 21:00 Toxi78 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". is this a joke? Why would this be a joke when it's a perfectly reasonable line of thinking?
Now obviously holding people in a relationship (but not actually married) legally accountable in this way would be absurd and stupid, but when it comes to actual marriage I don't see anything outlandish about this. A marriage is akin to a contract between 3 parties: the couple and the state. The couple mutually agree to X, Y and Z and in return, the state rewards them. If a contract is breached, it perfectly normal to hold the person legally accountable for his or her actions and for the person breaking the contract to suffer monetary or other possible actual consequences. Why should this not apply to marriage?
Right now, what we have is a situation where a couple enters a contract, then one party to the contract breaks it and cheats on his/her spouse. Divorce happens and then to top it off the person who got cheated on might now very much be still liable for alimony. Now THAT is absurd and ridiculous.
|
On November 24 2011 10:15 Roe wrote:that's a good argument to counter his, right? those are all created by religion So all along, we were so fucking stupid not to fight over resources, but religion? I mean, I am fine with people saying people use religion to do evil which is what I am sure you actually mean but still...
Political turmoil and poverty was very prevalent in Soviet Russia. There were Gulags and Stalin killed 11 million of his people. Pol Pot killed 1/4 of his population. Such political turmoil was not caused by religion.
|
Personally I think its sad and sickening that I've come to expect this kind of shit happening from over there
|
How can we be sure that the father is truly a rapist? It seems a little farfetched for her to hide the rape and then still concieve the child as well. Maybe she actually cheated with him and got preggo and then tried to use this as an out?
The law is still retarded as fuck though.
|
This is brutal the poor girl.
|
On November 24 2011 11:45 SpoR wrote: How can we be sure that the father is truly a rapist? It seems a little farfetched for her to hide the rape and then still concieve the child as well. Maybe she actually cheated with him and got preggo and then tried to use this as an out?
The law is still retarded as fuck though. Not really farfetched to hide the rape when this is what happens when it gets found out. Not a lot of ways to not conceive a child either for someone in that situation.
|
On November 24 2011 11:18 Jago wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:00 Toxi78 wrote:On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". is this a joke? Why would this be a joke when it's a perfectly reasonable line of thinking? Now obviously holding people in a relationship (but not actually married) legally accountable in this way would be absurd and stupid, but when it comes to actual marriage I don't see anything outlandish about this. A marriage is akin to a contract between 3 parties: the couple and the state. The couple mutually agree to X, Y and Z and in return, the state rewards them. If a contract is breached, it perfectly normal to hold the person legally accountable for his or her actions and for the person breaking the contract to suffer monetary or other possible actual consequences. Why should this not apply to marriage? Right now, what we have is a situation where a couple enters a contract, then one party to the contract breaks it and cheats on his/her spouse. Divorce happens and then to top it off the person who got cheated on might now very much be still liable for alimony. Now THAT is absurd and ridiculous.
having a law about adultery is pointless, those will get what they deserve when they are judged. worry less about what laws there should or shouldnt be - worry instead about being a better human youself.
|
On November 24 2011 03:12 GGTeMpLaR wrote:Really? 10 years in jail for getting raped? Another thread that just shows how fucked up the world of retarded people is. Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 01:45 Dfgj wrote:On November 23 2011 22:31 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 22:19 Nothingtosay wrote:On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself. All of those things are disgusting and should not be tolerated. Of course we have problems with out culture aswell, I for one think that death penalty is ridiculous, also I don't understand how gay marriage is still illegal etc....... You don't HAVE to tolerate other cultures, you can be reasonable, when you see something like this and be RIGHTFULLY DISGUSTED. You see, if you understand what you are saying, at its deepest discursive level, you would have avoided using the word "tolerate". It is such a philosophically loaded word dripping with false assumptions, and at worse, misguided moral perspective that, if you notice, no public intellectual, no matter how liberal, uses it in public discourse... since the 90s maybe. And who decides if something is worth being "rightfully disgusted" about or not? Who are you to decide whether or not I should be disgusted or find Afghanistan barbaric? I'm not from your culture. Oh look, your argument is now contradictory. Hooray for cultural relativism. edit: @Zvek Do you really support the idea that all cultures have equally valid value systems and should be treated equally? All I am saying is that the incident CAN NOT be judged on the basis of something as outright completely morrally/culturally right or wrong. Especially if you are looking at it from a perspective completely outside of them. It is like asking George Bush Jr. to seppuku for lying about WMD and the Iraq attack. CAN'T and WON'T happen simply because the cultural concept is totally alien to him. You can feel however you want about it, but do not pass judgment as if its the final word and as if you know everything there is to know about the world.
Those say that there is/ought to be a general universal value system are only one step away from those who invade another country in the name of democracy.
|
On November 24 2011 11:18 Jago wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 21:00 Toxi78 wrote:On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". is this a joke? Why would this be a joke when it's a perfectly reasonable line of thinking? Now obviously holding people in a relationship (but not actually married) legally accountable in this way would be absurd and stupid, but when it comes to actual marriage I don't see anything outlandish about this. A marriage is akin to a contract between 3 parties: the couple and the state. The couple mutually agree to X, Y and Z and in return, the state rewards them. If a contract is breached, it perfectly normal to hold the person legally accountable for his or her actions and for the person breaking the contract to suffer monetary or other possible actual consequences. Why should this not apply to marriage? Right now, what we have is a situation where a couple enters a contract, then one party to the contract breaks it and cheats on his/her spouse. Divorce happens and then to top it off the person who got cheated on might now very much be still liable for alimony. Now THAT is absurd and ridiculous. This is my attempt to explain why married people who "commit adultery" should not be prosecuted by the law.
INTRO
It's hard to make big ole' logical/convincing arguments for things that are so subjective, so let me just share my opinion and you're entitled to disagree, but I think that people who disagree with me are idiots (except my gf, she's allowed to like marriage [within reason]).
I don't think cheating on someone is morally reprehensible as far as the LAW goes. It's a break of trust between two people and I'm perfectly allowed to lie, it's legal. That's my problem and the government shouldn't touch it.
PART 1: WHY MARRIAGE IS BULLSHIT
The whole thing where "a marriage is akin to a contract between 3 parties" is such a ridiculous, ridiculous and disgusting fucking thing. I don't remember who said that, I think it was Doug Stanhope and it went a little like this: "Hey babe we've got a good thing going, MAYBE WE SHOULD GET THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVED IN THIS SHIT. We can't keep this shit to ourselves and live this commitment, we need lawyers involved and stuff."
See I think marriage should get the f' out of the government, be handled either by people themselves or (god forbid) by unneeded institutions with absolutely no power in the government. Needless to say, those institutions are as superfluous as fortune tellers. Now I hear it coming: "herp we need tax cuts when we get married". Is that a big part of your commitment to another person for you? Your tax cuts and stuff....? See that's how f'd up the whole institution of marriage is - when most of the implications are monetary. Not that there shouldn't be monetary implications to living with someone, but they shouldn't be directly "tied".
So, marriage is kind of a distorted tradition that used to be useless and became a workable mean for people to make a living by breaking up with richer people. How does that relate to the idea of making it illegal to tap another person when you're married? Well, it's none of the government's business.
Now the fact that we have to talk about how "abolishing the government-run marriage industry" translates for the legal system is a damn travesty and it's a great testament for the illegitimacy of the whole industry. The fact is that off the top of my head, I don't have a solution for how to handle tax cuts for "married" couples and I don't know how to handle child support and alimony - but why should those things be handled under a social contract supposedly meant to have something to do with love?
PART 2: WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SOMEONE CHEATS
The cheating should have no bearing on who keeps the kid, but that's not to say the person who committed adultery is good. The justice system should determine who's more able based on what truly affects the kid. In some cases, the adult's cheating doesn't come off as a surprise because he's known to be a dbag. In other cases, the adult's cheating comes off as a surprise and has no real impact on his relationship with the kid. Let me bring up 3 scenarios and I'll try to explain how things work in "my world".
1: Successful businessman makes 6 figures and gets "a little something on the side" - he's a more than capable father. His wife doesn't cheat, but she's not a very good mother for whatever reason (drugs, idiot, Texan, unemployed etc.). He should get judged for what he is. Capable father vs. not so capable mother -> he keeps the kid. Maybe she gets the kid for 2 days a week or whatever. Should he pay alimony? Nope, it's his money. Should he pay child support? Sure, 2 days worth of "support" but it's for the kid, it's not for her. He's not paying because he cheated - he's paying because his child needs monetary support.
2: A couple breaks up because the woman cheated on the man. They don't have a kid, but she's richer than her husband. Does she pay alimony? F' NO! She's just living her god damn life, she doesn't owe money to anyone.
3: A man cheats on his wife. He's generally a dbag and an absent father. She's a good woman who's able to take care of her kid. Alimony? Never. Child support? Of course, it's his kid.
Note: Child support shouldn't be a very variable value. Tiger Wood's $10k-per-kid monthly child support is retarded. Kids don't cost $120,000 to support for a year.
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: WHY A WORLD WITHOUT GOVERNMENT-RUN MARRIAGE MAKES MORE SENSE IN A HUMAN SOCIETY WHERE PEOPLE FUCKING DEAL WITH THEIR GOD DAMN PROBLEMS LIKE GROWN ADULTS
Marriage comes with ridiculous bullshit government interventions, but it's not required because the judicial system should not intervene in people's personal lives. Cheating is one of the hazards of "falling in love" and people should deal with it by themselves the same way any relationships end (ex: friends suddenly hating each other, work colleagues angry at each other). The government's involvement should be entirely and purely reserved for situations where young children are involved.
The judge is a neutral actor who's job is to determine who's more fit to be a parent: that person gets to raise the kid (completely, or partially with an advantage like 5 days vs 2). Any money transfers are 100% based on the needs of the kid. If both parents are well off, those transfers are unnecessary. If the financial situations are not balanced, it's important to make sure that the kid is comfortable in both homes.
|
Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible.
|
On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know.
|
Wow, I'm so glad my country funded "freedom fighters" with money and weaponry so Afghanistan could keep those Soviet commie bastards out of their country. I mean, that came out so swell for everyone. This is why the US should continue to police the world. Because we know what's good for everyone... including ourselves.
/sarcasm
|
On November 24 2011 10:53 tomatriedes wrote: Wow, things in Afghanistan have gotten so much better since it was liberated by the US. Very scientific statement. You've analyzed a lot of data points.
/ sarcasm.
|
On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know.
Civilized: Western Europe Australia Japan etc
Uncivilized: Afghanistan Iran other theocracies that have super high death ratios and forced religions.
|
Different civilization is not uncivilized.
Besides it does not surprised me as women have to hide all their skin because they're weak vicious creatures trying to corrupt men. This woman has succeed so she deserves jail. At least it's the way they think from what I've read in many newspapers from this type of countries. If you want to know more you should read the novel Les hirondelles de Kaboul from Yasmina Kadhra, a famous Algerian writer. It's about the first woman advocate of Afghanistan who's forced to live in her house because Taliban took power and other people who got their life ruined by Taliban. It's I think more accurate than most of Western analysis on the subject.
I'd fake to think like that if my life would be in danger at will from stupid moujaidines. Could you repeat what you said in your post in front of brainwahsed big beard guy with a Kalachnikov. Religion is a mean not a goal.
|
Completely disgusting. Would just like to point out that things like honor killings, killing women to prevent shame, protecting rapists because of male dominance and oppressive marriages are NOT part of the religion. They are part of the culture which often gets confused with religion by all parties.
|
On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know.
That wasn't very civil now was it?
Would you say that Afghanistan is civilised? I may not be able to tell what something is but still tell what it is not.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek.
Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner.
Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20)
That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love.
Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person".
If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved.
|
On November 24 2011 11:23 Shiragaku wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 10:15 Roe wrote: Ooh, another "cool atheist kid".
that's a good argument to counter his, right? decentralized tribal conflict, politics, poverty, and drugs
those are all created by religion So all along, we were so fucking stupid not to fight over resources, but religion? I mean, I am fine with people saying people use religion to do evil which is what I am sure you actually mean but still... Political turmoil and poverty was very prevalent in Soviet Russia. There were Gulags and Stalin killed 11 million of his people. Pol Pot killed 1/4 of his population. Such political turmoil was not caused by religion. we're talking about afghanistan here aren't we?
|
see we shouldn't even talk about those places
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 00:33 Elegy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:23 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 00:05 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:42 JesusOurSaviour wrote: [quote]So then CaptainCrush, what is your solution? Tell those countries Shari'a laws are wrong? Good luck. Good luck as a Dhimmi who has somehow subverted his position in their ideal islamic society and oppressed the Righteous muslims (for muslims see white people as a collective, as an entire Christian kingdom which has subjugated the muslim world for a long time). You most likely are not Christian (95% of TL-ers are not bible believing Christians). But they see you as one. And they think you're just dirt. You will be destroyed in the end. Muslims are taught from young that Islam and Allah are the truth. Everything else is false, lesser and demonic. Allah will destroy all the pigs (Jews and ChristiansWhite people) in the end. : )) Welcome to Islam
You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : ((((((( I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin. Since no one else ever tought me correctly, will you tell me why God™ created the HIV virus then? Seems quite contradictory to this whole "cares for you" thing Hi Vorenius, I've spoilered the response because it is too long. For the classic netizens who want a TL:DR this is it: God created the world, and it was good (Gen 1-2). There was no death, no suffering, no sin, no shame. And then sin came. How? Through the fall (Gen 3). HIV? God did not create sin. Man did. God did not intend for sin to be part of His creation. He created it good. Man chose to wreck it. There are plenty of viruses which have wreaked havoc on humanity. The world is broken. The creation is groaning under the corruption of sin. The creation itself eagerly awaits renewal (Romans ch8). God will renew all things and sin and suffering will be done away with. + Show Spoiler + The fundamentals of Christian faith can be summed up in this:
Creation -- The Fall -- The consequences of the fall through human history -- The first coming of Christ, His death and resurrection -- the spread of his kingdom on earth through the gospel of love -- His second coming.
The HIV virus enters the world stage at the level of "the fall". Reading Genesis chapters 1-3 will cover the very most fundamental truths of the Christian faith.
Genesis 1: God created the world in six days. He proclaims "And it was very good". There was no evil. And creation itself was just as God wanted it to be. Man and Woman were created in the image of the Triune God. We are special. We are like God. And it's pretty awesome.
Genesis 2: Adam and Eve were living under the authority of God, provided by God with food, water and work. Adam and Eve were to propagate and rule over this beautiful earth which God has created for them and their descendants. They were going to live forever and rule this earth forever. But God gave them everything and permitted all fruits to be eaten in this bountiful garden. Bar one. This specific tree you are not to eat from, God tells them. Why? "but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Simple right? So we thought. And Satan drives a wedge of mistrust between Adam, Eve and God. And they disobey God. Disobedience towards authority is sin. Not just any authority, but God who richly provided them with everything and breathed life into their nostrils.
Thus knowing the consequences (for God had told them earlier if they ate from this tree they will surely die), Man suffered the curse. Genesis ch3 then goes on and describes suffering, pain and death entering mankind. Diseases, decay and even natural disasters entered. Animals began to eat other animals. Pain and suffering entered when before the fall, there was only goodness.
HIV virus is just another example of the suffering which humanity and the ENTIRE creation is plagued with because of the sin of man in disobeying God. The consequences were clear: if you ate from that tree (when there were plenty of other sweet fruits to eat from), then you will die. Unfortunately they did and suffering entered the entire creation. But there is hope for renewal and God has already begun it at the cross where Jesus overcame death. The new heavens and new earth are coming, as well as the final judgement when all evil will be punished and a perfect, sinless world will be restored with Man rightfully ruling it under God.
Fairytale or Truth? Your life is going to go for another 80 years at max (I assume TL-ers are 20 years old). You're going to find out one way or another. My appeal to all of you is to find out about the Loving God who came to earth as a Man, to be ridiculed by those He came to save. Find out about Jesus, the Christ. Learn the love of God for mankind and repent from your ways. We are all evil before God, but He is not a unforgiving judge. Forgiveness and freedom stands at the door.
Pretty shitty deal that we get shafted because Adam and Eve fucked up. Deuteronomy 24:16 notwithstanding? Adam and Eve screwed up just as you would have screwed up. I never doubted that if I was tempted by the Serpent, I wouldn't have done the same. Sin lies around the corner and it's desire is to dominate us. To be honest, I see the world and it's brokenness, and read the biblical account of why it was so, and I agree. However, the bible does not specifically state in no uncertain terms, why God was willing to suffer so much estrangement from His children for such a long time, knowing before He even created man, that Man would be too weak to follow Him completely in the garden. There was no sin in the garden initially, but Man was tempted by Satan and he fell. Then the next question one must ask is: God - Why let Satan continue to exist? Why didn't you just lay the full smack-down on satan when he rebelled against you? Why let him roam the earth and tempt people? The non-biblical answer which we speculate, is that in allowing Satan to continue to wreak havoc on humanity, perhaps man will not take God for granted, but see that God is indeed the only good in this universe. This is not stated specifically in the bible, but this is why we suspect God is allowing Satan to wreak havoc for a little longer.
The good news is that God did not leave us helpless - for Jesus has already come and paid for our sins. He will come again soon - and all sin will be destroyed then. Satan will be punished for good, evil men who submitted to Satan and not to God will as well. Creation will be made new into perfection. God will walk with His people Amen!
Now Deut 24:16 - Let me ask you Elegy: Do you think you're sinful? Have you disobeyed God in any way since you were born? I tell you that God will not judge you by your Father's sin - for each is responsible for their own sin. But you have sinned and God will judge you by your own account. Each man is responsible for his own account before God.
|
That story sounded like something from my favorite Christian site, Landover Baptist Church lol (satirical Christians who take the word of the Bible to its logical conclusion- founder was expelled from Liberty University).
http://www.landoverbaptist.net/showthread.php?t=16536
|
On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Show nested quote +Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved.
And when is Jesus going to return again?
Your scripture says "this generation" at the time of John, yes?
Guess that one fell short.
St. Peter’s Apocalypse? St. Paul’s Apocalypse? Pseudo-Methodius? Tiburtine Sybil?
Adso, Joachim, Hildegard, St. Francis? Word of God too, or just really chill dudes? Peter John Olivi, Salimbene, Glaber? Augustine?
Come on. Claiming the Bible is the Word of God incarnate shows nothing more than a weak understanding of how the Good Book was compiled and conveniently avoids all the other texts excluded from it by nothing more than slim majorities and communal decision.
On November 24 2011 15:02 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:33 Elegy wrote:On November 24 2011 00:23 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 00:05 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:28 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 23:14 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:07 Vorenius wrote:On November 23 2011 22:58 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 22:51 Vorenius wrote: [quote] You could substitute 'muslim' for 'christian' and then 'white people' for 'non-christian' and have an equally objective descreption of bible believing christians. Yes for the destruction/judgement part, no for everything else. God wants all to come to repentance. And the God of this universe is not some detached God who doesn't care about anything (islamic Allah) but one who came to earth to be ridiculed by those who sinned against Him, scourged, and pay for our sins on the cross. One whose name is Love. One who created the world in love and made us in His image. That might be how you interpret Christianity, but it's definitly an image that is pretty much impossible to recognize looking at the actions of the Vatican (the main christian authority) the last thousand years. From anything from Crusades against infidels, the burning of countless women through the inquisition to claiming that condoms don't protect against HIV and it's a sin to use them. I'm sure that makes sense if you believe in superstition and magic, but I'm afraid I don't. I haven't since I was 8. I'm not gonna argue which is worse, Islam or Christianity, but my point is that the world would be a better place without either. Let me ask you my friend 3 questions: 1. Have you known for yourself by reading the gospels, Jesus the God-man who came to save us? 2.Would the Jesus of the Gospels (God Himself come to earth) be happy with the Catholic church? (Or any church which is so filled with hate, bigotry, corruption and godlessness) 3. Have you met a genuine follower of Jesus Christ and seen the love of Jesus in him? (I know Sweden is currently <1% Bible-believing/practicing Christian) 1) Reading and studying religious texts is part of the general education of everyone in Denmark, so yes I have. 2) not for me to say, but probably not 3)Yes, they knock on my door occasionally but usually leave when I explain I don't believe in magic My question for you would then be, why clang on to the 'Christian' tag? The basic Christian message has a lot to offer and the world would probably be a better place if more people lived by that. But then just call it a philosophy. Just say that you are a nice person or a friendly and loving person. If you insist those teachings comes directly from god you are only setting yourself up for all kinds of unnecesary dificulties. Not to mention that from the belief in an omnipotent god follows the fact that he must be the guy personally killing thousands in Tsunamies when he's not busy giving aids to babies in Africa. Also next time you see him tell him "fuck you" from me for inventing the flu virus. That shit gets me every year. Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : ((((((( I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin. Since no one else ever tought me correctly, will you tell me why God™ created the HIV virus then? Seems quite contradictory to this whole "cares for you" thing Hi Vorenius, I've spoilered the response because it is too long. For the classic netizens who want a TL:DR this is it: God created the world, and it was good (Gen 1-2). There was no death, no suffering, no sin, no shame. And then sin came. How? Through the fall (Gen 3). HIV? God did not create sin. Man did. God did not intend for sin to be part of His creation. He created it good. Man chose to wreck it. There are plenty of viruses which have wreaked havoc on humanity. The world is broken. The creation is groaning under the corruption of sin. The creation itself eagerly awaits renewal (Romans ch8). God will renew all things and sin and suffering will be done away with. + Show Spoiler + The fundamentals of Christian faith can be summed up in this:
Creation -- The Fall -- The consequences of the fall through human history -- The first coming of Christ, His death and resurrection -- the spread of his kingdom on earth through the gospel of love -- His second coming.
The HIV virus enters the world stage at the level of "the fall". Reading Genesis chapters 1-3 will cover the very most fundamental truths of the Christian faith.
Genesis 1: God created the world in six days. He proclaims "And it was very good". There was no evil. And creation itself was just as God wanted it to be. Man and Woman were created in the image of the Triune God. We are special. We are like God. And it's pretty awesome.
Genesis 2: Adam and Eve were living under the authority of God, provided by God with food, water and work. Adam and Eve were to propagate and rule over this beautiful earth which God has created for them and their descendants. They were going to live forever and rule this earth forever. But God gave them everything and permitted all fruits to be eaten in this bountiful garden. Bar one. This specific tree you are not to eat from, God tells them. Why? "but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
Simple right? So we thought. And Satan drives a wedge of mistrust between Adam, Eve and God. And they disobey God. Disobedience towards authority is sin. Not just any authority, but God who richly provided them with everything and breathed life into their nostrils.
Thus knowing the consequences (for God had told them earlier if they ate from this tree they will surely die), Man suffered the curse. Genesis ch3 then goes on and describes suffering, pain and death entering mankind. Diseases, decay and even natural disasters entered. Animals began to eat other animals. Pain and suffering entered when before the fall, there was only goodness.
HIV virus is just another example of the suffering which humanity and the ENTIRE creation is plagued with because of the sin of man in disobeying God. The consequences were clear: if you ate from that tree (when there were plenty of other sweet fruits to eat from), then you will die. Unfortunately they did and suffering entered the entire creation. But there is hope for renewal and God has already begun it at the cross where Jesus overcame death. The new heavens and new earth are coming, as well as the final judgement when all evil will be punished and a perfect, sinless world will be restored with Man rightfully ruling it under God.
Fairytale or Truth? Your life is going to go for another 80 years at max (I assume TL-ers are 20 years old). You're going to find out one way or another. My appeal to all of you is to find out about the Loving God who came to earth as a Man, to be ridiculed by those He came to save. Find out about Jesus, the Christ. Learn the love of God for mankind and repent from your ways. We are all evil before God, but He is not a unforgiving judge. Forgiveness and freedom stands at the door.
Pretty shitty deal that we get shafted because Adam and Eve fucked up. Deuteronomy 24:16 notwithstanding? Adam and Eve screwed up just as you would have screwed up. I never doubted that if I was tempted by the Serpent, I wouldn't have done the same. Sin lies around the corner and it's desire is to dominate us. To be honest, I see the world and it's brokenness, and read the biblical account of why it was so, and I agree. However, the bible does not specifically state in no uncertain terms, why God was willing to suffer so much estrangement from His children for such a long time, knowing before He even created man, that Man would be too weak to follow Him completely in the garden. There was no sin in the garden initially, but Man was tempted by Satan and he fell. Then the next question one must ask is: God - Why let Satan continue to exist? Why did you just lay the full smack-down on satan when he rebelled against you? The non-biblical answer which we speculate, is that in allowing Satan to continue to wreak havoc on humanity, perhaps man will not take God for granted, but see that God is indeed the only good in this universe. The good news is that God did not leave us helpless - for Jesus has already come and paid for our sins. He will come again soon - and all sin will be destroyed then. Now Deut 24:16 - Let me ask you Elegy: Do you think you're sinful? Have you disobeyed God in any way since you were born? I tell you that God will not judge you by your Father's sin - for each is responsible for their own sin. But you have sinned and God will judge you by what your own account. Each man is responsible for his own account before God.
You missed the point.
Am I sinful? Because of the sins of my father I am. Have I disobeyed God? Sure. But everyone is a sinner, and each man is a sinner because God allowed it to be so, and because Adam and Eve chose to believe a talking snake over the supreme majesty of the Almighty. I have sinned because God has ordained it that Mankind are sinners.
And it is impossible for everyone to be saved, even if every single person on Earth repented fully and embraced Jesus. Revelations tells us the vast majority of the Earth will perish-- Revelations is the absolute truth, thus the vast majority of Earth's people will die in the Apocalypse. With that inevitable fact set in the fabric of the universe as the absolute unyielding truth, not everyone can be saved. If everyone could be saved, Revelations would be a false prophecy.
|
On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Show nested quote +Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved. Thanks for the reply JesusOurSaviour.
I get what you are saying. I agree and disagree with some and most, but not to much as to warrant an extended discussion. What is important is that we can sift through the nuances of religious experience, as well as varieties, without ever feeling the moral urge to impose our superiority. But let me get a clarification on this particular line
Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved.
This is another of what I referred to as abstraction. I mean ontologically, how does this work? Isn't the very narrative of Christ itself the most instructive and direct guide to a Christian life - in a sense that if people just listen and understand hard enough, the life of Jesus Christ himself is a verbatim "How to be a Christian". Nothing less. Yet, as if people don't find it interesting enough, they subsume it with these "abstractions" that operate on quite a different epistemological assumptions - sin, salvation, redemption, etc.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 15:04 Elegy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved. And when is Jesus going to return again? Your scripture says "this generation" at the time of John, yes? Guess that one fell short. St. Peter’s Apocalypse? St. Paul’s Apocalypse? Pseudo-Methodius? Tiburtine Sybil? Adso, Joachim, Hildegard, St. Francis? Word of God too, or just really chill dudes? Peter John Olivi, Salimbene, Glaber? Augustine? Come on. Claiming the Bible is the Word of God incarnate shows nothing more than a weak understanding of how the Good Book was compiled and conveniently avoids all the other texts excluded from it by nothing more than slim majorities and communal decision. Never, I repeat, Never did Jesus claim or any other scripture claim that Jesus was going to come back BEFORE the first believers have fallen asleep. Please quote me the scriptural references and before you jump ahead, read the context.
Jesus promised that His second coming would be "like the lightning flashes from the east to the west" (paraphrased). It will be clear. And no one knows when, only the Father knows. 
Regarding all the non-scriptural writings people have wrote, they obviously are wrong. Scripture is what we have at the moment:66 books of the bible. Any additions such as the pseudoepigraphs/apocrypha do not share the same theological teachings (or have errant teachings). Jesus told us to be ready because He will come as a "thief in the night". People will be "drinking and being merry" when all of a sudden the "flood" hits and sweeps away all as in the days of Noah.
Are you ready Elegy?
|
On November 24 2011 15:11 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 15:04 Elegy wrote:On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved. And when is Jesus going to return again? Your scripture says "this generation" at the time of John, yes? Guess that one fell short. St. Peter’s Apocalypse? St. Paul’s Apocalypse? Pseudo-Methodius? Tiburtine Sybil? Adso, Joachim, Hildegard, St. Francis? Word of God too, or just really chill dudes? Peter John Olivi, Salimbene, Glaber? Augustine? Come on. Claiming the Bible is the Word of God incarnate shows nothing more than a weak understanding of how the Good Book was compiled and conveniently avoids all the other texts excluded from it by nothing more than slim majorities and communal decision. Never, I repeat, Never did Jesus claim or any other scripture claim that Jesus was going to come back BEFORE the first believers have fallen asleep. Please quote me the scriptural references and before you jump ahead, read the context. Jesus promised that His second coming would be "like the lightning flashes from the east to the west" (paraphrased). It will be clear. And no one knows when, only the Father knows.  Regarding all the non-scriptural writings people have wrote, they obviously are wrong. Scripture is what we have at the moment:66 books of the bible. Any additions such as the pseudoepigraphs/apocrypha do not share the same theological teachings (or have errant teachings). Jesus told us to be ready because He will come as a "thief in the night". People will be "drinking and being merry" when all of a sudden the "flood" hits and sweeps away all as in the days of Noah. Are you ready Elegy?
Matthew 24:..32? 34? One of those.
And you missed my point. Again.
Your scriptural writings were chosen by communal vote. Revelations was hotly contested as to whether it should be considered Scripture or not. Are you really ready to assume the absolute validity of that document when it came down to the wire and the decisions of men (flawed, sinful men) to make such monumental decisions on what the Word of God is?
|
On November 24 2011 14:16 arbitrageur wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. Civilized: Western Europe Australia Japan etc Uncivilized: Afghanistan Iran other theocracies that have super high death ratios and forced religions.
you have no clue about iran
well iran is not the best country but still much better then afghanistan saudi arabia syria and the rest of the middle east
except turky and maybe israel
|
The mere existence of things such as the Muratorian fragment disprove JesusOurSaviour's points almost completely....
-e- oops, meant to update, not new post.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 15:11 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved. Thanks for the reply JesusOurSaviour. I get what you are saying. I agree and disagree with some and most, but not to much as to warrant an extended discussion. What is important is that we can sift through the nuances of religious experience, as well as varieties, without ever feeling the moral urge to impose our superiority. But let me get a clarification on this particular line Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved.This is another of what I referred to as abstraction. I mean ontologically, how does this work? Isn't the very narrative of Christ itself the most instructive and direct guide to a Christian life - in a sense that if people just listen and understand hard enough, the life of Jesus Christ himself is a verbatim "How to be a Christian". Nothing less. Yet, as if people don't find it interesting enough, they subsume it with these "abstractions" that operate on quite a different epistemological assumptions - sin, salvation, redemption, etc. Hi Zvek, indeed we do not impose anything on each other, for each has to answer to his own account.
You are right that the Life of Jesus is the definitive guide to how a Christian ought to live. One just has to read the gospels to be able to grasp most of how a Christian should live his life: loving God and loving man. However we must also remember that Jesus was the promised, prophesied messiah. Scripture is there so that we may eagerly await the messiah who was going to save us. He didn't just come to tell you how to live life. He came to judge the hypocrites, condemn the hardhearted, call us to repentance, to love us, to conquer death, to pay for our sins, to shed His blood and have His body broken for us. It is the ultimate act of loving sacrifice from God who wants to reconcile Himself to His people. Sin, Salvation, redemption, atonement, even predestination, and other "abstractions" as you would call them - are all part of God's overall truth, so these are mentioned and I guess... learned? when you read the word of God? (I cannot see any way of separating the life of Jesus from God's overall truth).
I mean if there was no sin and no judgement - why should I live like Jesus? I might as well submit to the flesh and plunge myself into the dissipation of sin. If there was no salvation, I would live my life in fleshly pleasures - after all, there's only one chance right? If there was no redemption, salvation, judgement for sin - then God would be a terribly unjust, unloving and unholy God. However He is none of that.
I feel I may have totally missed your point with what I wrote just then. I seem to be on a lower "metacognitive" level than you are 
|
On November 24 2011 15:15 perser84 wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 14:16 arbitrageur wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. Civilized: Western Europe Australia Japan etc Uncivilized: Afghanistan Iran other theocracies that have super high death ratios and forced religions. you have no clue about iran well iran is not the best country but still much better then afghanistan saudi arabia syria and the rest of the middle east except turky and maybe israel Obviously arbitrageur has no clue about anything he is saying, that is why I ignored his reply, and you should ignore him too.
|
On November 24 2011 15:25 JesusOurSaviour wrote: I mean if there was no sin and no judgement - why should I live like Jesus? I might as well submit to the flesh and plunge myself into the dissipation of sin. If there was no salvation, I would live my life in fleshly pleasures - after all, there's only one chance right? If there was no redemption, salvation, judgement for sin - then God would be a terribly unjust, unloving and unholy God. However He is none of that. I got you, loud and clear. Thanks.
|
On November 24 2011 15:26 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 15:15 perser84 wrote:On November 24 2011 14:16 arbitrageur wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. Civilized: Western Europe Australia Japan etc Uncivilized: Afghanistan Iran other theocracies that have super high death ratios and forced religions. you have no clue about iran well iran is not the best country but still much better then afghanistan saudi arabia syria and the rest of the middle east except turky and maybe israel Obviously arbitrageur has no clue about anything he is saying, that is why I ignored his reply, and you should ignore him too. do you have an answer to your own question, either?
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 15:13 Elegy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 15:11 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 15:04 Elegy wrote:On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved. And when is Jesus going to return again? Your scripture says "this generation" at the time of John, yes? Guess that one fell short. St. Peter’s Apocalypse? St. Paul’s Apocalypse? Pseudo-Methodius? Tiburtine Sybil? Adso, Joachim, Hildegard, St. Francis? Word of God too, or just really chill dudes? Peter John Olivi, Salimbene, Glaber? Augustine? Come on. Claiming the Bible is the Word of God incarnate shows nothing more than a weak understanding of how the Good Book was compiled and conveniently avoids all the other texts excluded from it by nothing more than slim majorities and communal decision. Never, I repeat, Never did Jesus claim or any other scripture claim that Jesus was going to come back BEFORE the first believers have fallen asleep. Please quote me the scriptural references and before you jump ahead, read the context. Jesus promised that His second coming would be "like the lightning flashes from the east to the west" (paraphrased). It will be clear. And no one knows when, only the Father knows.  Regarding all the non-scriptural writings people have wrote, they obviously are wrong. Scripture is what we have at the moment:66 books of the bible. Any additions such as the pseudoepigraphs/apocrypha do not share the same theological teachings (or have errant teachings). Jesus told us to be ready because He will come as a "thief in the night". People will be "drinking and being merry" when all of a sudden the "flood" hits and sweeps away all as in the days of Noah. Are you ready Elegy? Matthew 24:..32? 34? One of those. And you missed my point. Again. Your scriptural writings were chosen by communal vote. Revelations was hotly contested as to whether it should be considered Scripture or not. Are you really ready to assume the absolute validity of that document when it came down to the wire and the decisions of men (flawed, sinful men) to make such monumental decisions on what the Word of God is?
Are you really ready to assume the absolute validity of that document when it came down to the wire and the decisions of men (flawed, sinful men) to make such monumental decisions on what the Word of God is? Yes I am. God is the creator of this universe. Everything, I repeat, ALL THINGS are in His plans.
Then I may ask you another question Elegy: Are you questioning that God was not powerful enough to speak to His people through the mouths of such broken peoples such as Moses? Jonah (jonah you bad boy!!)? That His Holy Spirit is a fake? All of the early church fathers who believed in the Lord Jesus had the Holy Spirit in them (just as any proper Christian does today). Are you then saying that God is not powerful enough to use His people to preserve and compile the scriptures which He wishes to keep as scripture?
That's only part one.
Part two: Have you read the writings which they "threw out"? I have begun to. And they are rubbish. Some teach sorcery. Some teach praying for the dead (hi catholics). All of them contradict the 66 books which we have right now. So though I was not present at the early church councils - I review their decisions and thank God that He put faithful men in place to do all this. I can assure you they have not made any mistakes in excluding some of the early rubbish which was circulated by false teachers. Satan lost in this case. Will Satan win in your life? Or will the love of Jesus overwhelm you?
Next: Matthew 24.
So you really think people would have continued believing in Christianity if Jesus supposedly claimed that He would come back before the early believers died? Man and all the faithful readers of scripture wouldn't have noticed what Jesus said and ONLY you noticed and apparently only you could see their folly?
Matthew Henry's bible commentary is a good place to start. But if you read Matthew 24 carefully, Jesus skirts the disciples questions. He never, ever, gives a definite time when He will come again to judge the world. He however prophesies that someone (Hi Antiochus Epiphanes) would desecrate the holy temple. He also tells of how he tore the temple down and will rebuild it (the body of believers being the new temple) in 3 days. Some theologians support the view that the "ultimate abomination" is to let one who is without sin (Jesus) be crucified in Jerusalem, with all the world's sin on Him.
No where and never did any of the disciples think that Jesus would definitely come back before they all died. John lived the longest and he never said nothing. Paul died in prison and never mentioned a word about "regret" or "shame" or any kind of doubting about why the Lord Jesus apparently didn't come back in time.
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 15:31 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 15:25 JesusOurSaviour wrote: I mean if there was no sin and no judgement - why should I live like Jesus? I might as well submit to the flesh and plunge myself into the dissipation of sin. If there was no salvation, I would live my life in fleshly pleasures - after all, there's only one chance right? If there was no redemption, salvation, judgement for sin - then God would be a terribly unjust, unloving and unholy God. However He is none of that. I got you, loud and clear. Thanks. No problems, let us rest then. I have to head out to a dinner soon, keep safe peeps!
|
On November 24 2011 04:45 Ashworth wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 04:40 Art.FeeL wrote: I believe this has nothing to do with religion. It is a matter of culture. Bad nonetheless. To the people mentioning Middle East learn you geography first. From when Afghanistan belongs to Middle East? Afghanistan is under Islamic law.
Who says that? You? Them? In the end it doesn't even matter. Bin Laden was declaring himself as a Muslim yet, things he did had nothing to do with Islam. Stop this generalization.
I live in the Middle East and have been coming here for 10+ years, so I know the attitude.
Stuff like this happens a fair bit, and it isn't too much to do with religion as it is the attitude of the people. There are some strictly religious based rulings made, for example, beating your wife is ok sometimes according to the religious law, althougth, and women being raped and it being 'their fault from bringing it on' is more just the attitude towards women, and not so much because their religion says it's ok.
This has to get a spotlight
|
What the fuck is going on in this thread?
|
This is what happends when religion becomes a law instead of a belief ;P.
|
On November 24 2011 15:49 garlicface wrote: What the fuck is going on in this thread? we just heard a wonderful sermon from jesusoursaviour
|
religious people are long-winded and never bereft of answers, it is annoying at the best of times.
Yet, annoyance would be a dream for this poor girl. Sadly, this is the state of the game in some countries around the world. Color me - not surprised in the least.
Fair question though, will the child be born "dirty?" I'm assuming she will give birth in prison, does the child of this situation carry any stigma?
so nonsensical. so very religious. sad face.
|
On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know.
While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized.
- Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent
Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized.
Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions.
|
On November 24 2011 16:09 Rebel_lion wrote: religious people are long-winded and never bereft of answers, it is annoying at the best of times.
Yet, annoyance would be a dream for this poor girl. Sadly, this is the state of the game in some countries around the world. Color me - not surprised in the least.
Fair question though, will the child be born "dirty?" I'm assuming she will give birth in prison, does the child of this situation carry any stigma?
so nonsensical. so very religious. sad face.
I'm a mormon, and the answer is certainly no, to the child being born "dirty." The sin is on the man, squarely, and the child did not sin, and neither did the mother. It's a terribly unfortunate situation, but to blame a child for a situation entirely out of its own control, is silly and contradictory to the gospel of personal repentance for individual accountability for sin taught by the Savior.
|
On November 24 2011 17:43 dOofuS wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 16:09 Rebel_lion wrote: religious people are long-winded and never bereft of answers, it is annoying at the best of times.
Yet, annoyance would be a dream for this poor girl. Sadly, this is the state of the game in some countries around the world. Color me - not surprised in the least.
Fair question though, will the child be born "dirty?" I'm assuming she will give birth in prison, does the child of this situation carry any stigma?
so nonsensical. so very religious. sad face. I'm a mormon, and the answer is certainly no, to the child being born "dirty." The sin is on the man, squarely, and the child did not sin, and neither did the mother. It's a terribly unfortunate situation, but to blame a child for a situation entirely out of its own control, is silly and contradictory to the gospel of personal repentance for individual accountability for sin taught by the Savior.
Maybe not for Mormons, but fundamental Christianity ends up at the same conclusion when you're not cherry picking scripture.
|
Holy SHIT close this thread.
|
On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Show nested quote +Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved.
Do you have any evidence for any of this?
Here's how you know something is bogus; replace the claimed entity with the word "Thor" ... If the claim with the substitution is equally as strong and equally as evidenced, then you know that you have no reason to believe the original claim to be true.
|
The thing is in the middle eastern cultures rape is seen to be the womans fault as they have supposedly 'seduced' the man into doing it...which is obviously completely idiotic. Thats why they wear those outfits that cover them from head to toe...because they are considered posessions of their husbands
|
On November 24 2011 14:49 JesusOurSaviour wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 00:34 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 00:04 JesusOurSaviour wrote:On November 23 2011 23:43 Zvek wrote:On November 23 2011 23:36 JesusOurSaviour wrote: Mandatory education of religious texts often puts people off religion. Because they do-not-teach-relationship-with-God and depravity of man. If they truly taught you both of those central themes of God's truth (relationship with God <3 + depravity of man) and actually tried to answer the big questions students ask (i.e. Why is there suffering? What is the devil? Why the devil? Why the fall? Why the cross?), then you guys at least would be informed unbelievers. Unfortunately, most people are unbelievers and uninformed. : (((((((
I can't say "F!@# you" to God for you. You need to say that yourself. And then you see his response to you is not punishment as one expects, but love and forgiveness. He is your Father and He cares for you more than you can ever know. It is sad people have distorted God so much when Jesus was all about loving the lost and punishing those who refuse to admit their sin.
Hi JesusOurSaviour, I'm interested in those points you brought up. I hope you could enlighten. 1. How should we approach religious/Catholic belief then? 2. What does faith teach us about suffering, a fundamental function of life? 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction? Thanks  I see what you did there My response is spoilered, since it is long. + Show Spoiler + 1. You need to take a look at every religious leader, every institutionalised religion and ask yourself: He says he is christian. But does he follow what his God teaches? Or He says he is muslim. Does he follow the pillars of islam?
So if the catholic church claims to be the authority of God, yet puts Christ' name in utter shame, hardening the hearts of the entire european spiritual climate, then what in the name of Satan are they doing? With this in mind, we must not judge individual catholics, of whom there are genuine followers of Christ Jesus and live a biblical-mandated life of love and gospel-outreach.
2. Faith in Jesus Christ is the answer to all the problems of this world. Don't laugh yet, listen. Suffering was not part of creation. "And he saw that it was good" was the proclamation God made after each day of creation. It was good. Adam and Eve stood across from each other, naked and not ashamed. Then Genesis ch3 happened. The devil tempted them by shoving a wedge of distrust between Adam + Eve and God. He convinced Adam and Eve that God wasn't good. That God was some kind of evil Father who denied them knowledge and denied them like a stingy and bitter Father. Eve stopped trusting God and ate. Adam did the same, he was there the whole time and also submitted to the devil. Thus suffering entered the world. "If you eat of that fruit, you will surely die". Thus, sin and death entered humanity as well as the entire creation. Animals started eating animals. Animals started dying. Humans no longer lived eternally under the provision of God. Humans died and returned to the dust. Death, decay, sickness, suffering are all one package that entered mankind, collectively known as the "curse of the fall".
This is the short account of how suffering came about.
Why does it continue to exist? Why doesn't God do something about suffering? He has. Jesus came to earth as a man, to redeem mankind for it's trespasses. One might ask: But mankind is good right? Yes - we are made in the image of God (though it is seared by sin), and we are capable of doing good. You have all helped charities which have come knocking on your door.
What of evil then? Matey you have surely done plenty of evil. In God's sight, evil is defiling. He is holy beyond our imagination. Not one bit of sin is tolerable in His holy presence. Thus, man and his lawlessness cannot enter the dwelling of God. All sin must be dealt with. God is the ultimate fair judge - who Himself being perfect, is able to judge fairly in all cases. No man who rapes, murders, steals, envies, hates, lusts, lies, is full of greed or is disobedient to parents can get away. This is the ultimate law court.
What about suffering? Well like we've already mentioned: Genesis ch3. is when the "curse of the fall" came to mankind and all of creation. The rest of the Old testament describes the evils of humanity and all of it's broken characters.
So then, what is God's plan to end the suffering? It was revealed in Genesis ch3 right after the fall of Man. "15 And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” "
This was the promise from God that a seed of the woman (the Man Christ Jesus) would one day crush satan.
This has partially been achieved at the cross where Jesus died and rose again. For no man has conquered death and death was Satan's ultimate weapon. Satan's power of temptation ultimately lies in the lie that man will die and that this life IS ALL THERE IS. But Jesus in pouring out His blood for the sins of mankind on the painful cross, and by rising again to life, has conquered death. Anyone who believes in Jesus is thus effectively baptised with Jesus in His death, and thus has his sins forgiven him. For Jesus has taken his sin and this man is justified before God. This ofcourse comes about through grace. (grace = gift of love which is not deserved, but undeserved and free).
God's plan to destroy suffering will be fully revealed at the second coming of Christ - the final day of judgement and the renewing of the heavens and earth (Revelations 21). Satan will be chained forevermore. All evil will be judged and punished. Suffering will cease. All will be renewed, Lions will lie next to lambs. We will never weep, be sick, nor thirst.
Blessed is God who abounds in steadfast love, Amen.
3. Sorry I don't comprehend the "not an abstraction" part. Could you please explain in a PM? Sorry about it, I read 3. a few times and really don't get what you are asking for. @__@ !! I will update this post once you explain it in another way. Sorry!!!
Hope you have gained some biblical perspectives on life, feel free to PM me, anybody that is.
Most instructive. I want to share this to others, and for them to participate, so I hope you don't mind if i post here instead of PM. I asked this: 3. What do they tell us - the devil, fall, cross, etc - about belief or life in general that is not an abstraction?Let me rephrase. These significant themes of Catholic literature - evil, the fall, the messiah, the cross, and even older once, like brotherhood and forgiveness, which run the length of Cain and Abel, up until Joseph the Dreamer, and some say, was culminated in Jesus himself ("Father, forgive them for they do not know what they are doing") have all been read textually, contextually, ontologically, hermeneutically, etc., by many, usually to serve a particular purpose, and most of the time, laughably ignorantly so. Now, all the time, the message/reading has always been tautological, something that exists already within the confines of Catholic faith, that is, God is Love, repent for your sins, man is weak but can be saved, and ultimately, and this is the grand scheme of religious belief, there is a grand plan where the original state of being will be restored. Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. In buddhist terms, all this affair with faith, Catholic, Islam, any, is comfined within the wheel of life - just as man is confined within the wheel of life, and just as God/the gods are confined in the wheel of life. Therefore, if I may paraphrase Buddha at the risk of oversimplification, faith, specifically belief in god is not useful/instructive in going about life. One has to tap a inner wellspring of morality/ethics that may or may not be caused by the divine, but certainly operates without it. On this note, what is this organic message that can be derived from all the Catholic themes? Thanks a lot. Thanks for the clarification Zvek. Show nested quote +Like I said, while they make you feel good and hopeful, they are at best abstractions. It seems that you have made yourself quite friendly towards the oriental philosophies and utterly rejected the message of the one and true God in an a priori manner. Let me tell you: the bible is the word of God. It has all, I repeat, all the answers to life. It is not some backwards text written to trick people. It was written by 40 or so authors over 1500 years, recording God's word and His interaction with the people whom He loved and made in His image. It was not written so that man could interpret to his own gain. For " these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name." (John 20) That is the purpose. That you may know the saviour of this world personally and then, live out the life to serve Him and your fellow mankind in love. Once again I repeat to all who are reading this: God is your Father, whether you choose to run away and waste away your life like the prodigal son, God is your Father and He will continue to love you. The problem here is our point of view I guess. You (and the rest of europe) have rejected the scriptures due to a variety of reasons; Catholic hypocrisy, state-institutionalised churches, liberalisation of the faith, materialism just to name a few. I am a Christian because after I read the gospels I believed on the Lord Jesus Christ. He has given me His holy Spirit to understand all scriptures. Those who are blinded and are unbelieving will always "see and do not perceive, hear and do not understand" (as was prophesied against the Jews of the day). Thus, the lost will always make up excuses to not even try to seek God. Common ones range from "Jesus is a myth" to "Religion is for making people feel communal" to " Religious people do bad things and I am a good person". If you think you are good, I guess you can always test your goodness before God when Jesus returns to judge and renew the world. But I assure you: believing in any human philosophy will get you nowhere. Humans are flawed. "there is nothing new under the sun". Indeed - no matter how hard we try, greed, lust, wars, dissensions, envy, strife, and all other destructive ways will always pursue every man to his deathbed. Thanks be to God who gave His son for us that we may no longer be enslaved. Oh that reminds me something...
I don't worship God. You know who I pray to? Joe Pesci. Two reasons; first of all, I think he's a good actor. Ok. To me, that counts. Second; he looks like a guy who can get things done. Joe Pesci doesn't fuck around. In fact, Joe Pesci came through on a couple of things that god was having trouble with. For years I asked god to do something about my noisy neighbor with the barking dog. Joe Pesci straightened that cock-sucker out with one visit.
|
if she didn't want to get raped she should have buried herself in the ground
fucking slut
User was banned for this post.
|
On November 24 2011 18:08 Skiblet wrote: The thing is in the middle eastern cultures rape is seen to be the womans fault as they have supposedly 'seduced' the man into doing it...which is obviously completely idiotic. Thats why they wear those outfits that cover them from head to toe...because they are considered posessions of their husbands Most rapes in Europe or the US are not reported today because of the feeling of shame associated with it.
Look at how men react when someone happens to have been raped, you will be very surprised. I understood hardcore feminists the day I saw a lot of people, and especially men taking the side of the offender in a case of rape that happened in my school (same all good arguments: "she was flirty" or "look how she was dressed", etc etc...)
Look also at how religious institutions react when someone get raped. You'll be surprised too.
Our institutions do protect victims, but that's because of a very hard struggle by feminists movements. 60 years ago, rapes were pretty much ignored. And still today, the mentalities of people in our societies are much less straightforward than it may seem when you listen to what people say. Their reaction in situation is often very different.
|
If it makes you feel any better there are millions and millions and millions of people on this planet that can only dream to live like a quuen like the woman in this story, compared to what they have. Most of the real suffering isnt caused by religion, so i find most of the religion hate meaningless, as it usually only causes minor inconviniences like this.
|
Rapes were not ignored, Biff. It was a crime that got people lynched, after all. However, for the crime of rape to exist, there must be both the actus reus and the mens rea, that is the penetration without consent and the knowledge that one is having sex without the consent of the woman. Given that the medical evidence often doesn't show more than that sex occured, and that rape cases often come down to the verbal testimony of the alleged victim against that of the alleged perpetrator, it should be hard to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt. Thats why the history of alleged victim was dredged up: because if you are going to send someone to prison or the chair on the basis of a person's word, you want make damn sure that she is of unimpeachable integrity.
|
Is this one of those debates where someone white knights the american military and someone harkens them back to the age of the inquisition?
Oh wait its a general forum thread barely researched. Created with no attempt at non-bias or objectivity, let alone sourcing. my favorite part is it's ABL bait but with less "closed" content.
Yay!
EDIT: my favorite part is the title, because that's a fitting, objective, and non-misleading title
|
On November 24 2011 18:53 Synwave wrote: Is this one of those debates where someone white knights the american military and someone harkens them back to the age of the inquisition?
Oh wait its a general forum thread barely researched. Created with no attempt at non-bias or objectivity, let alone sourcing. my favorite part is it's ABL bait but with less "closed" content.
Yay!
EDIT: my favorite part is the title, because that's a fitting, objective, and non-misleading title
odd way of looking at it
the title may not be objective, but it does fit the facts
it is sourced... cnn is decently respectable
and forums dont have to be objective, it's about opinion... so yea
|
Why do laws like this still exist in Afghanistan? Aren't the Talibans like... not in power anymore?
|
On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. if I am not mistaken, that is only your definition of civilized. for one, you are missing education.
(and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.)
|
On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. please bear in mind most of your points are your definition if civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.)
Oh yay a criticism that doesn't actually have any point or substance except to criticize.
Wooo...or something you were trying to say?
|
On November 24 2011 19:32 Synwave wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. please bear in mind most of your points are your definition if civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) Oh yay a criticism that doesn't actually have any point or substance except to criticize. Wooo...or something you were trying to say? if you define the key terms based upon your own definition, how do you expect the discussion can continue/develop??
|
On November 24 2011 19:34 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 19:32 Synwave wrote:On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. please bear in mind most of your points are your definition if civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) Oh yay a criticism that doesn't actually have any point or substance except to criticize. Wooo...or something you were trying to say? if you define the key terms based upon your own definition, how do you expect the discussion can continue/develop?? Yup you told him...to semantically defend himself. While not doing so yourself. ...your so... how and where do I find that school of argumentation because its so.. yeah
|
|
On November 24 2011 19:53 HaXXspetten wrote: I don't even... WHY? because weak minded ppl (and i'm being nice) believe in this absurd thing called religion.
|
That is awful! No offence to Muslims but when countries of that predominate religion show those tendencies it does no favors for them. I and I think billions of other people would be disguised to live under law like that. Women deserve rights, and when a women is raped and it is her fault for it, there is something very, very wrong with that culture.
|
Apparently you didn't realize that this isn't gender specific. A male raped under sharia law is also to be blamed.
|
So apparently, If I move to Afghanistan, or travel there, I can rape women and not receive any punishment? Can anyone elaborate to a "legal noob" how this works? (FYI I have no interest to being shot or tortured, So going to this particular part of the world is nothing more than a thought). How is this acceptable in contrast to the law? How is this possible with zero repercussion from governing bodies?
|
On November 24 2011 20:14 Phayze wrote: So apparently, If I move to Afghanistan, or travel there, I can rape women and not receive any punishment? Can anyone elaborate to a "legal noob" how this works? (FYI I have no interest to being shot or tortured, So going to this particular part of the world is nothing more than a thought). How is this acceptable in contrast to the law? How is this possible with zero repercussion from governing bodies? Im pretty sure raping is also illeagal in Afghanistan.
|
On November 24 2011 20:11 Synwave wrote: Apparently you didn't realize that this isn't gender specific. A male raped under sharia law is also to be blamed.
you realize that a woman can't rape a man? and if a male rapes another male, all hell would break loose for both of them
|
No, a woman can rape a man. It just takes a bit more elaborate planning: usually drugs need to be administered to incapacitate and an aphrodisiac to obtain an erection. Then of course, there is statutory rape: where an adult woman has sex with an underage boy. Incidently, if either those result in pregnancy, the male still has to pay child support to her.
|
Yeah... and in Aztec culture having your heart ripped out as an offering was considered an honor... we make this world (Humans), so i guess we are to blame... I would like to cut that guys dick off thou.
|
On November 24 2011 20:36 CutthroatCollapse wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 20:11 Synwave wrote: Apparently you didn't realize that this isn't gender specific. A male raped under sharia law is also to be blamed. you realize that a woman can't rape a man? and if a male rapes another male, all hell would break loose for both of them
You haven't kept up on international trials of male on male rape in islamic law countries I see.
|
On November 24 2011 20:43 Synwave wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 20:36 CutthroatCollapse wrote:On November 24 2011 20:11 Synwave wrote: Apparently you didn't realize that this isn't gender specific. A male raped under sharia law is also to be blamed. you realize that a woman can't rape a man? and if a male rapes another male, all hell would break loose for both of them You haven't kept up on international trials of male on male rape in islamic law countries I see.
then please go ahead and tell me about it
|
On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce".
wtf? srs? i can't tell fi your serious or not but regardless
A law being instated like that without the cultural back ground would cause an uproar especially with how our society runs that would be a big shit show
|
On November 24 2011 20:53 CutthroatCollapse wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 20:43 Synwave wrote:On November 24 2011 20:36 CutthroatCollapse wrote:On November 24 2011 20:11 Synwave wrote: Apparently you didn't realize that this isn't gender specific. A male raped under sharia law is also to be blamed. you realize that a woman can't rape a man? and if a male rapes another male, all hell would break loose for both of them You haven't kept up on international trials of male on male rape in islamic law countries I see. then please go ahead and tell me about it And spoiler the entire game that is real life and the world? Nawwwww you gotta experience it for yourself my friend. Try going to the local inn and asking about rumors.
Shit that works in skyrim not here, my bad. How about you open up your browser and I dont know...type in something and see what you get.
Dont want to spoiler it for you. Obviously your living in a very rare and sheltered world.
|
So pizza's a vegetable and a raped woman's get out of jail card is to marry her rapist. Seriously? World I swear to get you are trying specifically trying to piss TL off. Fuck you world.
|
Ofcourse a woman can rape a man lol. She can put a gun to your head or threaten you or your family with something else (blackmail). She can force you to fuck her or she can sodomize you with some item. It's very possible.
Silly that I need to explain this here.
|
On November 24 2011 20:54 ShakAttaK wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:43 DarkRise wrote: Wow really? The problem is that she didn't report it so ofc it was consented as mutual and not RAPE. But still the laws are so silly and disgusting. Although i would like to have a law that prosecute adultery here in US and not just get away with "divorce". wtf? srs? i can't tell fi your serious or not but regardless A law being instated like that without the cultural back ground would cause an uproar especially with how our society runs that would be a big shit show
Actually, the US has that. Married soldiers who commit adultery can be charged under the UCMJ, male or female. Sadly, their civilian spouses are not under any such restrictions. Its not like finding out that your spouse is cheating can have a negative impact on a soldier's morale. (adultery is covered by the general article, under bringing the force into disrepute, negatively impacting the functioning of the army, etc)
|
United Arab Emirates1141 Posts
On November 24 2011 15:54 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 15:49 garlicface wrote: What the fuck is going on in this thread? we just heard a wonderful sermon from jesusoursaviour Thank you Roe, I thank you regardless of whether you are trolling or not. Last word from me on this thread: Keep your mind open peeps, real christians do. I hope real atheists will also keep their mind open. Stay safe - God gave us a beautiful earth to live on, enjoy the gift from our loving creator!
|
On November 24 2011 21:00 frontliner2 wrote: Ofcourse a woman can rape a man lol. She can put a gun to your head or threaten you or your family with something else (blackmail). She can force you to fuck her or she can sodomize you with some item. It's very possible.
Silly that I need to explain this here.
LOL, she can force you to fuck her? I dont think this will quite work out. But your obviously right the she could sodomize you.
This one and the one where a woman drugs you so you get a hard on while youre asleep are all very probable scenarios of course...NOT
And to you Mr synwave smarty pants who is so very mundane and knowledgable: I could of course look it up via awesome google even in my "rare" and totally sheltered world, but a) I dont have too much time right now to read through everything and b) as you are the designated expert on this topic I thought you might just give me/us some insight instead of just saying I dont know anything about it.
|
On November 24 2011 22:43 CutthroatCollapse wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 21:00 frontliner2 wrote: Ofcourse a woman can rape a man lol. She can put a gun to your head or threaten you or your family with something else (blackmail). She can force you to fuck her or she can sodomize you with some item. It's very possible.
Silly that I need to explain this here. LOL, she can force you to fuck her? I dont think this will quite work out. But your obviously right the she could sodomize you. This one and the one where a woman drugs you so you get a hard on while youre asleep are all very probable scenarios of course...NOT And to you Mr synwave smarty pants who is so very mundane and knowledgable: I could of course look it up via awesome google even in my "rare" and totally sheltered world, but a) I dont have too much time right now to read through everything and b) as you are the designated expert on this topic I thought you might just give me/us some insight instead of just saying I dont know anything about it. You try removing the blood from your raging erection with a vagina rolling over it. Honestly, I dont think any man in the world has that much control over his manliness. Men most certainly can be raped by women. With that said, I dont know what to say about this case considering there are many more like it. I wish someone could respond to my last post.
|
On November 24 2011 19:34 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 19:32 Synwave wrote:On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. please bear in mind most of your points are your definition if civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) Oh yay a criticism that doesn't actually have any point or substance except to criticize. Wooo...or something you were trying to say? if you define the key terms based upon your own definition, how do you expect the discussion can continue/develop??
Post the "accepted" definition of civilized and stop blabbering so we can start discussing.
|
Whether a woman can rape a man or not depends on the definition of rape that is used in a country. Rape does not translate 1:1 into forced sex. A women can force sex on a man.
The problem is that some countries qualify rape as forced penetration in wich case a women having sex with you against your will doesn't count as rape.
None of this has any relation to the story however. Stop trying to think the story is different and we are all "missing" something. Sharia law is just that retarded, get with the times, or i suppose stay back in the times if you want a better understanding of this medieval thinking.
|
On November 24 2011 20:05 Nizaris wrote:because weak minded ppl (and i'm being nice) believe in this absurd thing called religion.
I find it hard to accept that views like this are completely tolerable on these forums, whereas a firm religious conviction will often close a thread. I understand the desire of moderators to play the neutral role, but in silencing religious opinion it's basically not neutral at all. I am glad that this thread has not yet been closed, but don't appreciate that posts like these go unwarned.
Just because you don't have faith in a deity and its associated moral teachings, doesn't obligate you to degrade those who do.
|
On November 24 2011 19:50 Synwave wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 19:34 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 19:32 Synwave wrote:On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. please bear in mind most of your points are your definition if civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) Oh yay a criticism that doesn't actually have any point or substance except to criticize. Wooo...or something you were trying to say? if you define the key terms based upon your own definition, how do you expect the discussion can continue/develop?? Yup you told him...to semantically defend himself. While not doing so yourself. ...your so... how and where do I find that school of argumentation because its so.. yeah First, I didn't tell him to do anything. I am just stating that all his definitions were based upon his own concept of "civilised" Secondly, I am not familiar with the topic, hence I don't not post a "standard I hope it is right because it sounds right to me" definition and pull off an argument as a fact. And thirdly, go find a school that teach you how to write proper sentences and grammar before trying to find "that school of argumentation".
|
On November 23 2011 22:14 Zvek wrote: What is disgusting is all the posters here on TL taking the "moral high ground".
Really, what do we/you know about culture/justice? I say they can handle on their own. Our disgust over it, no matter what it is, is a product of ignorance, or worse unchecked elitism. This cultural difference occur everywhere, why should Afganistan be singled out? In the USA, you can divorce, which is totally inhumane and completely idiotic for the Arabs. Not to mention all the wars the US has started in the name of "democracy". In some tribes in Africa, the boys are introduced to adulthood by making them have sex with their sisters, and drink the semen of older men.
Let them solve their "situation/problem". Keep your judgment to yourself.
That last line is probably one of the silliest things I've ever heard. Imagine if no one shared their judgements? No changes to our thoughts because we wouldn't see other people's point of view. If you don't like this forum made for discussion, then don't come here. And the "let them solve it themselves" bit is a really bad idea. We're all human beings, and any act that is being unjustly cruel to one of our species should be taken into consideration, no matter where it is. Here let me give you an example: Hey look some people just formed their own civilization in some remote part of the world. Their culture involves them eating some babies and cooking people alive. But, it's not happening here, so let's just leave them to their own devices.
Also, yes there are several other cultures that can be just as bad, or worse, but this thread is specifically dedicated to this culture. Make a thread about those cultures, or bad cultures in general, and then a good discussion about them can begin.
|
Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell.
|
On November 24 2011 18:46 vetinari wrote: Rapes were not ignored, Biff. It was a crime that got people lynched, after all. However, for the crime of rape to exist, there must be both the actus reus and the mens rea, that is the penetration without consent and the knowledge that one is having sex without the consent of the woman. Given that the medical evidence often doesn't show more than that sex occured, and that rape cases often come down to the verbal testimony of the alleged victim against that of the alleged perpetrator, it should be hard to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt. Thats why the history of alleged victim was dredged up: because if you are going to send someone to prison or the chair on the basis of a person's word, you want make damn sure that she is of unimpeachable integrity. Well, that's a convenient explanation. I think you overestimate humanity:
Now your first statement is just wrong: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/subpages/reviews/schulhofer.html
The first third of UNWANTED SEX describes the inadequacy of American laws against rape. Schulhofer begins with a sketch of what many readers will believe to be the bad, but bygone, days of restrictive definitions of the crime that drew upon Blackstone's eighteenth century yardstick: "carnal knowledge of a woman forcibly and against her will." American statutes employed Blackstone's standard until the 1950s. Legislators, police, judges, and jurors, virtually always male, demanded a showing of extreme violence, lest consent be considered to have been given by the victim. As a result, conviction rates for individuals accused of rape remained low. A typical judgment cited by Schulhofer was that of the Nebraska Supreme Court which, in 1947, stated "'submission' would count as consent 'no matter how reluctantly yielded'" (p. 20).
You may also want to read this:
http://www.racismreview.com/blog/2009/10/11/the-rape-of-black-women-by-white-men-systemic-racism-again/
... and those 10 facts:
Fact #1: 17.6 % of women in the United States have survived a completed or attempted rape. Of these, 21.6% were younger than age 12 when they were first raped, and 32.4% were between the ages of 12 and 17. (Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women, Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, November, 2000)
Fact #2: 64% of women who reported being raped, physically assaulted, and/or stalked since age 18 were victimized by a current or former husband, cohabiting partner, boyfriend, or date. (Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women, Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, November, 2000)
Fact #3: Only about half of domestic violence incidents are reported to police. African-American women are more likely than others to report their victimization to police Lawrence A. Greenfeld et al. (1998). (Violence by Intimates: Analysis of Data on Crimes by Current or Former Spouses, Boyfriends, and Girlfriends. Bureau of Justice Statistics Factbook. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice. NCJ #167237. Available from National Criminal Justice Reference Service.)
Fact #4: The FBI estimates that only 37% of all rapes are reported to the police. U.S. Justice Department statistics are even lower, with only 26% of all rapes or attempted rapes being reported to law enforcement officials.
Fact #5: In the National Violence Against Women Survey, approximately 25% of women and 8% of men said they were raped and/or physically assaulted by a current or former spouse, cohabiting partner, or date in their lifetimes. The survey estimates that more than 300,000 intimate partner rapes occur each year against women 18 and older. (Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women, Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey, November, 2000)
Fact #6: The National College Women Sexual Victimization Study estimated that between 1 in 4 and 1 in 5 college women experience completed or attempted rape during their college years (Fisher 2000).
Fact #7: Men perpetrate the majority of violent acts against women (DeLahunta 1997).
Fact #8: Every two minutes, somewhere in America, someone is sexually assaulted. (Rape, Abuse and Incest National Network (RAINN) calculation based on 2000 National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice)
Fact #9: One out of every six American women have been the victims of an attempted or completed rape in their lifetime. (Prevalence, Incidence and Consequences of Violence Against Women Survey, National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998)
Fact #10: Factoring in unreported rapes, about 5% - one out of twenty - of rapists will ever spend a day in jail. 19 out of 20 will walk free. (Probability statistics based on US Department of Justice Statistics)
|
this is why we shouldnt have freed these people we should have just dropped a nuke on them and called it a war. We wasted american lifes oversea's to protect trash like this? F bush wish we would have had a president who had the balls to drop a nuke.
User was banned for this post.
|
On November 25 2011 03:06 Modeath wrote: this is why we shouldnt have freed these people we should have just dropped a nuke on them and called it a war. We wasted american lifes oversea's to protect trash like this? F bush wish we would have had a president who had the balls to drop a nuke. Stay classy, Teamliquid.
|
On November 25 2011 03:06 Modeath wrote: this is why we shouldnt have freed these people we should have just dropped a nuke on them and called it a war. We wasted american lifes oversea's to protect trash like this? F bush wish we would have had a president who had the balls to drop a nuke. I hope you enjoyed your stay here. Can hardly believe you lasted a month and a half.
|
On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which.
|
Sometimes i wonder why stuff like this pops up on TL, its disgusting.
|
On November 25 2011 03:13 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which. That's very haphazard logic.
Suggesting a lack of objective values entails either cultural relativism/subjectivism or outright nihilism. For the former, not only can we point to extreme cases where clearly relativism cannot extend (genocides, torture, etc), but there is nothing inherent in saying 'X act is moral in Y culture' that demands that another culture accept that Y perform X as moral. While it is true that each culture possesses different morals and upholds them in different ways, there is also sound argument that many of these cultural morals are internalized uncritically and are not subject to rational scrutiny. Something of the nature of what happens in this thread's topic is a case I would argue falls into this, as its attribution of blame is utterly irrational.
In the latter case, if you're arguing for nihilism (which I assume you're not), we don't have a discussion.
|
I dont even have words...... this world makes me sad
|
On November 25 2011 01:31 dOofuS wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 20:05 Nizaris wrote:On November 24 2011 19:53 HaXXspetten wrote: I don't even... WHY? because weak minded ppl (and i'm being nice) believe in this absurd thing called religion. I find it hard to accept that views like this are completely tolerable on these forums, whereas a firm religious conviction will often close a thread. I understand the desire of moderators to play the neutral role, but in silencing religious opinion it's basically not neutral at all. I am glad that this thread has not yet been closed, but don't appreciate that posts like these go unwarned. Just because you don't have faith in a deity and its associated moral teachings, doesn't obligate you to degrade those who do. Totally agree, we shouldn't degrade people who think it's morally right to jail a woman for being raped.
Silencing idiots is also not neutral, but the mods do that, too! Why TL, whyyy?
|
On November 25 2011 04:08 Dfgj wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 03:13 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which. That's very haphazard logic. Suggesting a lack of objective values entails either cultural relativism/subjectivism or outright nihilism. For the former, not only can we point to extreme cases where clearly relativism cannot extend (genocides, torture, etc), but there is nothing inherent in saying 'X act is moral in Y culture' that demands that another culture accept that Y perform X as moral. While it is true that each culture possesses different morals and upholds them in different ways, there is also sound argument that many of these cultural morals are internalized uncritically and are not subject to rational scrutiny. Something of the nature of what happens in this thread's topic is a case I would argue falls into this, as its attribution of blame is utterly irrational. In the latter case, if you're arguing for nihilism (which I assume you're not), we don't have a discussion. The overabundance of -isms in your post got me a bit dizzy. Don't be simple. The sooner you realize that the world is more complicated than it appears, the better you'll be. Societies and cultures do not necessarily, and in fact do not have to operate on moral dichotomies.
|
On November 25 2011 04:25 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 04:08 Dfgj wrote:On November 25 2011 03:13 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which. That's very haphazard logic. Suggesting a lack of objective values entails either cultural relativism/subjectivism or outright nihilism. For the former, not only can we point to extreme cases where clearly relativism cannot extend (genocides, torture, etc), but there is nothing inherent in saying 'X act is moral in Y culture' that demands that another culture accept that Y perform X as moral. While it is true that each culture possesses different morals and upholds them in different ways, there is also sound argument that many of these cultural morals are internalized uncritically and are not subject to rational scrutiny. Something of the nature of what happens in this thread's topic is a case I would argue falls into this, as its attribution of blame is utterly irrational. In the latter case, if you're arguing for nihilism (which I assume you're not), we don't have a discussion. The overabundance of -isms in your post got me a bit dizzy. Don't be simple. The sooner you realize that the world is more complicated than it appears, the better you'll be. Societies and cultures do not necessarily, and in fact do not have to operate on moral dichotomies. Trying to find an overall solution is far better than simply saying 'we don't know which is which' with regards to right and wrong and leaving it at that. I'd argue that that mindset is a lot more 'simple'.
|
On November 25 2011 04:32 Dfgj wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 04:25 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 04:08 Dfgj wrote:On November 25 2011 03:13 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which. That's very haphazard logic. Suggesting a lack of objective values entails either cultural relativism/subjectivism or outright nihilism. For the former, not only can we point to extreme cases where clearly relativism cannot extend (genocides, torture, etc), but there is nothing inherent in saying 'X act is moral in Y culture' that demands that another culture accept that Y perform X as moral. While it is true that each culture possesses different morals and upholds them in different ways, there is also sound argument that many of these cultural morals are internalized uncritically and are not subject to rational scrutiny. Something of the nature of what happens in this thread's topic is a case I would argue falls into this, as its attribution of blame is utterly irrational. In the latter case, if you're arguing for nihilism (which I assume you're not), we don't have a discussion. The overabundance of -isms in your post got me a bit dizzy. Don't be simple. The sooner you realize that the world is more complicated than it appears, the better you'll be. Societies and cultures do not necessarily, and in fact do not have to operate on moral dichotomies. Trying to find an overall solution is far better than simply saying 'we don't know which is which' with regards to right and wrong and leaving it at that. I'd argue that that mindset is a lot more 'simple'. Unless you are GOD himself, stop pretending that you have an "overall solution." Before you reply again, let's go back to the OP, try to read the story again, and realize how little you know about the cultural context at play on that case, much less on the philosophical epistemes that animate and have animated such beliefs for such a long time (long enough to migrate them into the level of laws). And we are not even on the part of the actual narrative of events itself.
|
On November 25 2011 04:41 Zvek wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 04:32 Dfgj wrote:On November 25 2011 04:25 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 04:08 Dfgj wrote:On November 25 2011 03:13 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which. That's very haphazard logic. Suggesting a lack of objective values entails either cultural relativism/subjectivism or outright nihilism. For the former, not only can we point to extreme cases where clearly relativism cannot extend (genocides, torture, etc), but there is nothing inherent in saying 'X act is moral in Y culture' that demands that another culture accept that Y perform X as moral. While it is true that each culture possesses different morals and upholds them in different ways, there is also sound argument that many of these cultural morals are internalized uncritically and are not subject to rational scrutiny. Something of the nature of what happens in this thread's topic is a case I would argue falls into this, as its attribution of blame is utterly irrational. In the latter case, if you're arguing for nihilism (which I assume you're not), we don't have a discussion. The overabundance of -isms in your post got me a bit dizzy. Don't be simple. The sooner you realize that the world is more complicated than it appears, the better you'll be. Societies and cultures do not necessarily, and in fact do not have to operate on moral dichotomies. Trying to find an overall solution is far better than simply saying 'we don't know which is which' with regards to right and wrong and leaving it at that. I'd argue that that mindset is a lot more 'simple'. Unless you are GOD himself, stop pretending that you have an "overall solution." Before you reply again, let's go back to the OP, try to read the story again, and realize how little you know about the cultural context at play on that case, much less on the philosophical epistemes that animate and have animated such beliefs for such a long time (long enough to migrate them into the level of laws). And we are not even on the part of the actual narrative of events itself. Nobody claimed to have a solution to morality or ethics.
I don't consider 'it's their culture' as an acceptable reason to take acts like this - that's logic by which you can excuse any action unconditionally. In any case, Islamic law in society does not necessarily justify this as far as I know - while law in Islamic texts is extremely harsh, punishments of that meter were not always administered, rather it has been suggested they were written as deterrence in an unstable society. Religious texts in the past also forms only the core of Islamic legal process, being supplemented by schools of law and secular rulings (sunni), or interpretation by major religious figures (shia).
The Afghan law behind this ruling is technically in line with Sharia - a hadd punishment for haram (prohibited actions). However, we can definitely argue as to how reasonably this ruling was applied in terms of establishing blame, and the discretion of the judge.
|
On November 25 2011 04:54 Dfgj wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 04:41 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 04:32 Dfgj wrote:On November 25 2011 04:25 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 04:08 Dfgj wrote:On November 25 2011 03:13 Zvek wrote:On November 25 2011 02:20 Dark_Chill wrote: Ok I'm seeing a big problem in this thread, with people saying we can't talk about this, our cultures and our countries are fucked up too. And the weird thing is, in most of the comments, no one had ever said my country and culture is better than that one. The fuck is wrong with you people? I can't talk because my place sucks too? Does that somehow hinder my understanding? I still know that what's happening is fucked up. That fact wouldn't change if I lived in heaven or hell. Try to relax a bit. What we are saying is that don't ever assume you have a moral high ground on this matter, especially that it operates on a different cultural context. Complain and rage all you want, but never make the mistake that this is a simple right and wrong issue, and that you know with absolute certainty which is which. That's very haphazard logic. Suggesting a lack of objective values entails either cultural relativism/subjectivism or outright nihilism. For the former, not only can we point to extreme cases where clearly relativism cannot extend (genocides, torture, etc), but there is nothing inherent in saying 'X act is moral in Y culture' that demands that another culture accept that Y perform X as moral. While it is true that each culture possesses different morals and upholds them in different ways, there is also sound argument that many of these cultural morals are internalized uncritically and are not subject to rational scrutiny. Something of the nature of what happens in this thread's topic is a case I would argue falls into this, as its attribution of blame is utterly irrational. In the latter case, if you're arguing for nihilism (which I assume you're not), we don't have a discussion. The overabundance of -isms in your post got me a bit dizzy. Don't be simple. The sooner you realize that the world is more complicated than it appears, the better you'll be. Societies and cultures do not necessarily, and in fact do not have to operate on moral dichotomies. Trying to find an overall solution is far better than simply saying 'we don't know which is which' with regards to right and wrong and leaving it at that. I'd argue that that mindset is a lot more 'simple'. Unless you are GOD himself, stop pretending that you have an "overall solution." Before you reply again, let's go back to the OP, try to read the story again, and realize how little you know about the cultural context at play on that case, much less on the philosophical epistemes that animate and have animated such beliefs for such a long time (long enough to migrate them into the level of laws). And we are not even on the part of the actual narrative of events itself. Nobody claimed to have a solution to morality or ethics. I don't consider 'it's their culture' as an acceptable reason to take acts like this - that's logic by which you can excuse any action unconditionally. In any case, Islamic law in society does not necessarily justify this as far as I know - while law in Islamic texts is extremely harsh, punishments of that meter were not always administered, rather it has been suggested they were written as deterrence in an unstable society. Religious texts in the past also forms only the core of Islamic legal process, being supplemented by schools of law and secular rulings (sunni), or interpretation by major religious figures (shia). The Afghan law behind this ruling is technically in line with Sharia - a hadd punishment for haram (prohibited actions). However, we can definitely argue as to how reasonably this ruling was applied in terms of establishing blame, and the discretion of the judge. First, -ism bombing. Now, a questionable sketch of Islam/Afgan law and culture. Everything except a definitive and well-informed take on the issue (sorry, a misguided search for an overall solution does not count either). Which tells me that you are simply on a fishing expedition, so I promptly leave you alone to it now.
|
On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. if I am not mistaken, that is only your definition of civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.)
His question was: "In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not?". So yea, of course its only my definition of civilized.
I don't see why you need education in order to be civilized. Feel free to explain.
Equality means treated equally. It's very easy to define, it's just hard to apply.
|
Historically, it's been personal moral discipline that curbed bad behavior. Today it seems like we all turn to governments or law enforcement to control what our societal decline in moral discipline has caused -- bad behavior.
Religions may not have a perfect record of obeying the teachings they themselves advocate, but to abolish religion entirely on that basis is illogical. People who openly blame 'religion' as a whole, refuse to accept that the individuals generally found contradicting the teachings of their professed religion, are 'extremist' or have misinterpreted or perverted the teachings to promote violence in the name of deity. The large majority of the adherents to any of these faiths in question, are moral and good people. To demand they give up their belief system because a few have tarnished the reputation of that system, is a dangerous step toward denying individuals freedom and liberty.
|
On November 25 2011 08:29 dOofuS wrote: Historically, it's been personal moral discipline that curbed bad behavior. Today it seems like we all turn to governments or law enforcement to control what our societal decline in moral discipline has caused -- bad behavior.
Religions may not have a perfect record of obeying the teachings they themselves advocate, but to abolish religion entirely on that basis is illogical. People who openly blame 'religion' as a whole, refuse to accept that the individuals generally found contradicting the teachings of their professed religion, are 'extremist' or have misinterpreted or perverted the teachings to promote violence in the name of deity. The large majority of the adherents to any of these faiths in question, are moral and good people. To demand they give up their belief system because a few have tarnished the reputation of that system, is a dangerous step toward denying individuals freedom and liberty.
It's also really stupid, don't forget that. Still, what way is there to remove religious extremism other than taking away the medium in which it is practiced? I'm going by the logic that the suffering of the many outweighs the happiness of the many
|
On November 25 2011 07:10 killa_robot wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. if I am not mistaken, that is only your definition of civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) His question was: "In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not?". So yea, of course its only my definition of civilized. I don't see why you need education in order to be civilized. Feel free to explain. Equality means treated equally. It's very easy to define, it's just hard to apply. treating equally doesn't mean equality. One very good example is, in some countries, women have stand-up urine toilet, is that equality? When you put it as part of your requirements, how do you define there is equity in law?
One definition that I stumbled upon when I was doing some related assignment, all the definitions that I came across never had clear steps of defining a country is civilised or not. The only common theme that they mentioned was "Culture" (from historical values and education to the current generation). High culture and Low culture level. The rest are such as "people have high level of ethics and moral"
It's a topic of sociology philosophy which I am not too familiar with, but saying out right as if Afghanistan is not civilized because they do not "fulfill" the requirements is just not right.
|
On November 25 2011 12:38 Dark_Chill wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 08:29 dOofuS wrote: Historically, it's been personal moral discipline that curbed bad behavior. Today it seems like we all turn to governments or law enforcement to control what our societal decline in moral discipline has caused -- bad behavior.
Religions may not have a perfect record of obeying the teachings they themselves advocate, but to abolish religion entirely on that basis is illogical. People who openly blame 'religion' as a whole, refuse to accept that the individuals generally found contradicting the teachings of their professed religion, are 'extremist' or have misinterpreted or perverted the teachings to promote violence in the name of deity. The large majority of the adherents to any of these faiths in question, are moral and good people. To demand they give up their belief system because a few have tarnished the reputation of that system, is a dangerous step toward denying individuals freedom and liberty. It's also really stupid, don't forget that. Still, what way is there to remove religious extremism other than taking away the medium in which it is practiced? I'm going by the logic that the suffering of the many outweighs the happiness of the many
Just because you don't like religion, what justifies, in all seriousness, the complete abolition of it? It offers peace, comfort, understanding, and happiness to many people. To completely remove it because you don't see the value in it, seems pretty selfish. Truly religious individuals are not going to harm you. They obey certain laws and adhere to moral principles because of an understanding of their purpose and benefit to themselves and society. The individuals who twist doctrines to justify breaking their own religions principles and teachings are a minority and should not be allowed to dictate the freedoms of the majority.
You're implying we should not allow individuals the freedom to practice religion.
|
I'm not saying that that's a good thing. If you read the beginning of my comment, you'd know I openly acknowledged it as being a stupid idea. All I am basically saying is that there is no simple solution to religious extremism, and the one we do have is moronic and unjust.
|
There are some cruel practices in different parts of the world, especially as we look in on other cultures. One that comes to mind similar to this is Pakistan's anti-blasphemy law, which can and does put people in jail (or sometimes kill) people for not following the main religion. A lot of Christians have been persecuted in Pakistan. I'm sure other countries are at oddswith each other over the difference in customs and traditions. However, I think the majority can agree that things like this are horrific and should be ended, at least from the western viewpoint.
|
On November 23 2011 20:41 Wafflelisk wrote: I'm usually a moral relativity guy; that other cultures have different values and should not be looked down upon. But even this has it's limits. And this, my friends, is a limit. Truly disgusting.
that moral relativity idea is morally bankrupt
|
ya this is pretty bad. The worst part about these uncivlisised countries prosecuting women is that it is the womens own male family members subscribe to such outrageous customs. On a side note how come in the general section of team liquid it is mostly horrible stories that are posted lol? In the last week there has been: child beaten by judge, american soldier rapes girls, girl raped, child run over by van, etc. I know the posters are trying to generate a conversation but what do they expect to hear besides its horrible lol. nobody is gonna disagree with them and if they do they get banned. Not really complaining it keeps me up to date with the latest horrors of the world but maybe the team liquid community needs to look on the brighter side lol.
I expect to see darkness lifted with posts of: girl makes cookies for nursing home, girl starts charity to help the homeless, american soldiers build schools for afghani children.
get to work ^^
|
But Ill belive that if you underestimate the woman, you will never achive anything. The woman has always been pushed down in all situations through time. But I guess that the Arabic countries reads the bible too mutch and thinks to little by them selfs.
Not that having a religion is something bad, I belive that everybody need something to belive in. Like, God, Allah etc. But everybody cant just stand in line and dont walk forward. I dont know if there is a solution to the problem, but something need to be done soon.
Regards, Gustav
|
On November 25 2011 17:04 iRk wrote: But Ill belive that if you underestimate the woman, you will never achive anything. The woman has always been pushed down in all situations through time. But I guess that the Arabic countries reads the bible too mutch and thinks to little by them selfs.
Not that having a religion is something bad, I belive that everybody need something to belive in. Like, God, Allah etc. But everybody cant just stand in line and dont walk forward. I dont know if there is a solution to the problem, but something need to be done soon.
Regards, Gustav
?
|
On November 25 2011 15:56 csfield wrote:Show nested quote +On November 23 2011 20:41 Wafflelisk wrote: I'm usually a moral relativity guy; that other cultures have different values and should not be looked down upon. But even this has it's limits. And this, my friends, is a limit. Truly disgusting. that moral relativity idea is morally bankrupt
Edit: nevermind, pretty sure I didn't understand your comment/joke/criticism properly the first time I made my post.
|
So pretty much if you don't want to go to jail, don't get raped. Fucking ace logic. + Show Spoiler +
|
|
On November 25 2011 17:10 FabledIntegral wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 17:04 iRk wrote: But Ill belive that if you underestimate the woman, you will never achive anything. The woman has always been pushed down in all situations through time. But I guess that the Arabic countries reads the bible too mutch and thinks to little by them selfs.
Not that having a religion is something bad, I belive that everybody need something to belive in. Like, God, Allah etc. But everybody cant just stand in line and dont walk forward. I dont know if there is a solution to the problem, but something need to be done soon.
Regards, Gustav ?
He has absolutely no idea what he is talking about
|
Someone explained to me in Arab culture men are treated as if they were children, almost all the shame and honor for that matter is placed on women it isn't religious it's tribal. This is why their women are 100% covered up in some of these countries they just accept the fact men are dogs and if they are aroused they will act like dogs. So from their point of view this is how they blame the women isn't it sad how little Arab's except form their men.
|
On November 25 2011 13:50 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 07:10 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. if I am not mistaken, that is only your definition of civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) His question was: "In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not?". So yea, of course its only my definition of civilized. I don't see why you need education in order to be civilized. Feel free to explain. Equality means treated equally. It's very easy to define, it's just hard to apply. treating equally doesn't mean equality. One very good example is, in some countries, women have stand-up urine toilet, is that equality? When you put it as part of your requirements, how do you define there is equity in law? One definition that I stumbled upon when I was doing some related assignment, all the definitions that I came across never had clear steps of defining a country is civilised or not. The only common theme that they mentioned was "Culture" (from historical values and education to the current generation). High culture and Low culture level. The rest are such as "people have high level of ethics and moral" It's a topic of sociology philosophy which I am not too familiar with, but saying out right as if Afghanistan is not civilized because they do not "fulfill" the requirements is just not right.
What do stand-up urine toilets for women have to do with equality in law?
How do I define that there is equality in law? Well when laws don't explicitly state a certain gender or certain race should be treated different, then equality should exist.
So would you say Afghanistan is a civilized country then? Because I would love to hear your reasoning for that.
Also you can't say you're not familiar with something then say my opinion on the matter isn't right. After all you just said you don't know much about the subject, so you can't define what is right or wrong concerning it.
|
On November 25 2011 20:48 killa_robot wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 13:50 ETisME wrote:On November 25 2011 07:10 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. if I am not mistaken, that is only your definition of civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) His question was: "In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not?". So yea, of course its only my definition of civilized. I don't see why you need education in order to be civilized. Feel free to explain. Equality means treated equally. It's very easy to define, it's just hard to apply. treating equally doesn't mean equality. One very good example is, in some countries, women have stand-up urine toilet, is that equality? When you put it as part of your requirements, how do you define there is equity in law? One definition that I stumbled upon when I was doing some related assignment, all the definitions that I came across never had clear steps of defining a country is civilised or not. The only common theme that they mentioned was "Culture" (from historical values and education to the current generation). High culture and Low culture level. The rest are such as "people have high level of ethics and moral" It's a topic of sociology philosophy which I am not too familiar with, but saying out right as if Afghanistan is not civilized because they do not "fulfill" the requirements is just not right. What do stand-up urine toilets for women have to do with equality in law? How do I define that there is equality in law? Well when laws don't explicitly state a certain gender or certain race should be treated different, then equality should exist. So would you say Afghanistan is a civilized country then? Because I would love to hear your reasoning for that. Also you can't say you're not familiar with something then say my opinion on the matter isn't right. After all you just said you don't know much about the subject, so you can't define what is right or wrong concerning it.
Actually, what "the laws explicitly state" has almost Nothing to do with how society operates. Laws on the books are ignored by aspects of the government or don't cover actions by non governmental portions of society.
|
On November 24 2011 10:32 Probulous wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2011 09:28 s4life wrote:On November 24 2011 08:52 Rebs wrote: This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with the nature of society in the country, the same thing is pretty common where I am from, its pretty disgusting but the issues here are alot more complex than "omg what a savage society"
This has everything to do with religion friend. Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs. The problem with these beliefs is that you don't need to explain them logically or rationally, it's a jump made in the dark to an even darker place... hopefully your society will someday outgrow religion, at least to the same degree western cultures did w.r.t. catholic religion in the middle ages. Edit: to the poster above me.. I think you misquoted me. Just bare in mind that correlation != causation. A religious person can do monstrous stuff for reasons other than religion. If it was as simple as "Perfectly normal, average people will do the most terrible things -- mostly to women and children -- just because of religious beliefs." then you would expect that religious people are generally doing this more than non-religious. Well in societies that aren't stuck in the middle ages, I doubt this is the case. For example, this isn't possible in the US. Not because people are less religious but because people and society as a whole is more educated, structured and there is a robust system of law. People do monstrous things without religion. People do monstrous things with religion. It is how society deals with them that is different. It is easy to blame this stuff on religion, it just isn't always the cause. The fact that there are millions of muslims all over the world and this shit only happens in countries where societal structure has broken down, suggests to me that perhaps religion isn't the major cause for this behaviour.
I did not exclude any other reason as to why a person would commit mounstruos acts. I simply stated that it takes religion for a normal, otherwise good and moral person to commit the most hyenous acts against women and children and I stand by that statement. I agree on your second point, we are not torturing/burning people or killing women suspected of being witches no more BECAUSE we outgrew religion. Here in USA, the grip of religion has been reduced to basically a community outreach/building institution and that's fine.. to a certain point. However, in societies like the middle eastern ones, poverty, lack of education and other maladies are, if not as a direct result, facilitated tremendously by the dissemination of certain religious beliefs. Tere, women abuse in all possible ways is excused because of religion -- that's not correlation my friend, they jail women after being raped because of a twisted interpretation of the Coran --. Poverty in fact, is a direct consequence of the disempowerment of women if you think about it.
|
On November 25 2011 13:50 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On November 25 2011 07:10 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 19:25 ETisME wrote:On November 24 2011 17:24 killa_robot wrote:On November 24 2011 14:02 Zvek wrote:On November 24 2011 13:54 killa_robot wrote: Its Afghanistan, its not as though its a civilized country.
This is just terrible. In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not? And in your opinion, please list down the civilized and non civilized country that you know. While I won't list a bunch of countries, as that would be pointless, I'll tell you what qualifies a country as civilized. - Equality in law for people of all races and genders (LAW, not society) - Minimal fear of the government harming its own citizens for their own benefit - Minimal fear of citizens attacking people for religious/personal beliefs (Keep in mind this means in general, plenty of countries that are civilized have ghettos where this may happen) - Separation of religion and government, to a reasonable extent Afghanistan does not fulfill all of these requirements, therefore they are not civilized. Now feel free to actually input something rather than just ask questions. if I am not mistaken, that is only your definition of civilized. for one, you are missing education. (and how to define equality? it isn't so simple.) His question was: "In your opinion, what makes a country civilized or not?". So yea, of course its only my definition of civilized. I don't see why you need education in order to be civilized. Feel free to explain. Equality means treated equally. It's very easy to define, it's just hard to apply. treating equally doesn't mean equality. One very good example is, in some countries, women have stand-up urine toilet, is that equality? When you put it as part of your requirements, how do you define there is equity in law? One definition that I stumbled upon when I was doing some related assignment, all the definitions that I came across never had clear steps of defining a country is civilised or not. The only common theme that they mentioned was "Culture" (from historical values and education to the current generation). High culture and Low culture level. The rest are such as "people have high level of ethics and moral" It's a topic of sociology philosophy which I am not too familiar with, but saying out right as if Afghanistan is not civilized because they do not "fulfill" the requirements is just not right.
Yes, lets all argue about semantics and personal definitions, because thats what the topic is about. Right?
Most countries that follow Shariat have a tough time ensuring civil liberties of women are protected. The men get to do whatever the hell they want. It is always the woman who bears the greater punishment even if they are innocent. Honor killings and mistreatment of women is a common occurrence in these countries.
|
The only way to be convicted of adultery or fornication in the original sharia law is if four proven people witnessed the act of penetration or if the person came forth his/herself and confessed. So at Prophet Muhammad's time, you'd only get convicted if you came out and said so directly to a court (because people weren't having sex in front of an audience). Basically, it was your own business. If a child came from it, you still didn't have evidence that the sex was consensual. Rape was punished with no blame on the victim.
Blaming the victim or cases like this are a cultural result. In the case of Afghanistan, what's happening now is 10x less harsh than what was going on 10 years ago under Taliban. Yes, it's horrible, but you can't expect a people who lived for so long under the Taliban to be that socially developed. Sadly, this is technically progress for them.
|
On November 26 2011 06:40 LittleAtari wrote: The only way to be convicted of adultery or fornication in the original sharia law is if four proven people witnessed the act of penetration or if the person came forth his/herself and confessed. So at Prophet Muhammad's time, you'd only get convicted if you came out and said so directly to a court (because people weren't having sex in front of an audience). Basically, it was your own business. If a child came from it, you still didn't have evidence that the sex was consensual. Rape was punished with no blame on the victim.
Blaming the victim or cases like this are a cultural result. In the case of Afghanistan, what's happening now is 10x less harsh than what was going on 10 years ago under Taliban. Yes, it's horrible, but you can't expect a people who lived for so long under the Taliban to be that socially developed. Sadly, this is technically progress for them.
Well, the Taliban follows a 'strict' interpretations of the Coran and sharia law. You can't just come and pretend that what happened to that poor girl has no connection to religious fundamentalism and shamelessly attribute it to cultural differences.
|
|
|
Wack country with no regard for human rights. Why do we "help" over there? This is the government we've backed?
|
On December 02 2011 13:05 dUTtrOACh wrote: Wack country with no regard for human rights. Why do we "help" over there? This is the government we've backed? Huh? help ?? What has Cadana and America done to actually help over there haha.
|
Well, at least she isn't going to be in jail for 12 years. Even if she is kinda f-ed over now. As for help? Oh, I honestly don't know
|
So instead of jail, she agrees to marry her rapist with the prospects of being raped for the rest of her life... hmm
|
Fucking sick. I wonder if this kind of thing is wide in Afganistan and in the Islam countries. Real fucking sick.
|
|
On December 01 2011 06:32 s4life wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2011 06:40 LittleAtari wrote: The only way to be convicted of adultery or fornication in the original sharia law is if four proven people witnessed the act of penetration or if the person came forth his/herself and confessed. So at Prophet Muhammad's time, you'd only get convicted if you came out and said so directly to a court (because people weren't having sex in front of an audience). Basically, it was your own business. If a child came from it, you still didn't have evidence that the sex was consensual. Rape was punished with no blame on the victim.
Blaming the victim or cases like this are a cultural result. In the case of Afghanistan, what's happening now is 10x less harsh than what was going on 10 years ago under Taliban. Yes, it's horrible, but you can't expect a people who lived for so long under the Taliban to be that socially developed. Sadly, this is technically progress for them. Well, the Taliban follows a 'strict' interpretations of the Coran and sharia law. You can't just come and pretend that what happened to that poor girl has no connection to religious fundamentalism and shamelessly attribute it to cultural differences.
Why not exactly? It's not like he's denying the religious connection. What he's saying is that the interpretation has been skewed by the 'cultural differences'.
|
looks like she was pardoned and may not be marrying her attacker. lets hope this is accurate.
Afghanistan has pardoned a woman who was raped by a family member but then jailed for adultery, a statement from the presidential palace has said, in a case that highlights deep concerns about women's rights in the country.
It remained unclear whether the 21-year-old-woman, known as Gulnaz, would still have to marry the man who attacked her, her cousin's husband, after an earlier release offer which stipulated they must marry.
...
Gulnaz had eventually agreed to the condition she marry her attacker under the earlier release offer but her lawyer said the release granted this week did not depend on her going through with the marriage.
http://news.yahoo.com/afghan-woman-jailed-being-raped-wins-pardon-060512716.html
|
|
|
|