Bulgarian Riots - Page 10

On September 28 2011 00:40 Euronyme wrote:


It was on the front page.

On September 27 2011 23:25 vanhio wrote:
But when some of the gypsies refuse to work and are criminals, that isn't racism, that is being USELESS to society.



90% of them refuse to work and the only thing they do is stealing. People who wants only privilegs and no responsibilities are plague to society. Most of them are not paying their bills and still gets water and electricity. Free water and electricity sounds cool right ? Who do you think pays for all of this ? Who do you think pays child support to every 15 years old gipsy girl with 3 childrens ? People here are sick and tired of this SHIT !

On September 28 2011 00:43 Probe1 wrote:

See how it says temp banned?
All I see are more and more riots happening from the responses in this thread and elsewhere on the internet. Enjoy another 1100 years of hating each other....

On September 28 2011 00:39 Probe1 wrote:
n00b3rt it reads like all 10 of the kids are posting in this thread~
Post a fuckin solution instead of blanketing every single person of one group as murderous leeches.

On September 28 2011 00:42 RajaF wrote:


Actually it's not a "wild assumption" friend. The 2001 and 2006 romanian census found that 92% and 94% of the roma population was unemployed and not looking for work.

On September 28 2011 00:46 Motivate wrote:


also, when people say "gypsy" does it refer to the romani ethnic group or just the subgroup roma?

On September 28 2011 00:47 n00b3rt wrote:

read my post before being dumb. You have more than 6k posts, and you still haven't learnt to read those of others ? if it's too long for you, don't make comments about it while insulting me. And if you are so smart maybe you can give a solution ?

On September 28 2011 00:46 Motivate wrote:
wow i had no idea about the whole gypsy situation, but that's because i'm in australia

how is it that an entire ethnic group is so hated and fixed in their ways? doesn't seem to be any other ethnic group like this. while indigenous australians are much worse off than other groups in australia, it seems to be largely from a lack of opportunity and historically they were treated terribly. they do get a lot of special treatment now, but it doesn't seem like the right kind of treatment and like gypsies, there have been issues integrating them. but they don't hang together in groups and steal shit. i just don't get how an entire culture can be based around immoral stuff like that. how can people not be generalising here?

also, when people say "gypsy" does it refer to the romani ethnic group or just the subgroup roma?

On September 28 2011 00:46 RajaF wrote:


Talking like a true citizen of the only country to be in a continual state of war with someone for the last 30 years.

On September 28 2011 00:48 vanhio wrote:


No point to argue with statistician. You don`t have the numbers, you are wrong. Well i guess living in Bulgaria my whole life, doesnt mean i have an idea about stuff in Bulgaria. No need to reply to this genius.

On September 27 2011 22:10 speedphlux wrote:
OK, first off, this problem doesn't have any sort of racial hatred to it. It's an act vs. crime and corruption in Bulgaria, rather then vs. gypsies. But sadly it has created a lot of tension in the wrong direction, mainly ticked off by Rupert Murdock's bTV media outlet in here, who are just after cheap sensations.
The main protests were vs. Kiril Rashkov and his family, who plagued the area of over a decade now. The police and the authorities have done nothing to prevent it and the people from that area has risen up to ask for their expulsion from the area.
The murder of the 19 years old boy was the spark that caused that flame to burst out. In the following protests, another young man died due to heart failure (he was reported to have an artificial clamp or w/e on his heart). In the early stages of the protests, a member of the Rashkov family got in a car and drove thru a crowd of people, injuring quite a few. I'm sure about at least 4 police officers who have limbs broken, but I'm sure there are other civilians hurt as well.
After in the initial protests the house and few of the cars of the Rashkov family caught fire, Kiril Rashkov came on television, threatening that he'll "cut the throats" of those responsible and that he'll "call in reinforcements from other gypsy tribes".
In the aftermath, the gypsy head court of justice, known as "The Meshkere", sentenced Kiril Rashkov to death by hanging, but since that court has no real value, the sentence can't be performed and has absolutely no jurisdictial value. The actions of the court mean that pretty much no other gypsy clan would aid the Rashkov family, so there's no ground for racial hatred.
Of course, we have the usual nationalistic parties, trying to "ride the protest", but the people from the area are pretty much neglecting the political side of things. The only political aspect of the whole deal is that all the authorities haven't done their job already and that had to happen.
Gypsies from all over the country are scared to let their kids to school and refuse to go to work themselves, due to random, unorganized, shady activities by nationalistic bikers, but the main line is that this protest isn't targeting the gypsies.

On September 28 2011 00:53 Mohdoo wrote:
Can someone elaborate on what exactly a gypsy.. is? I don't get it. I'm having a hard time finding a definition which seems to fit what's being talked about in this thread.

On September 28 2011 00:54 PlaGuE_R wrote:


having lived in australia, i can tell you that aborigens dont get nearly as bad a wrap as gypsies. the general feeling on them was ranging from indifference to mild disgust. come to France, EVERYONE here despise gyspies, there are NO exceptions.

On September 28 2011 00:55 m00nchile wrote:

The hell? He said that the vast majority of gypsies were unemployed and not looking for work. He's not only agreeing there is a problem, he's posting eveidence as well. Why attack a person trying to prove your point?