First-Ever Images of an Electron In Orbit - Page 3
Forum Index > General Forum |
EternalSC
Sweden313 Posts
| ||
SaftKalasEmil
Sweden213 Posts
On August 30 2011 03:06 travis wrote: Honey I shrunk the camera. wow, i lol'd xD pretty cool pics tho! | ||
Fatze
Germany1342 Posts
| ||
NrG.Bamboo
United States2756 Posts
On August 30 2011 03:41 enzym wrote: Which you don't have…? Or what are you trying to say? o_o I think he was probably trying to say that you have to understand the significance of the discovery in order to appreciate the magnitude of the breakthrough. But I am not science-savvy at all, so I am less blown-away by the images, and I think he feels the same way. | ||
Skilledblob
Germany3392 Posts
| ||
DoXa
Switzerland1448 Posts
Really nice to see it with "real" pictures and not just modells | ||
rebuffering
Canada2436 Posts
| ||
beg
991 Posts
On August 30 2011 03:46 Shockk wrote: This is truly impressive, especially the "microscope" technology involved. Let me quote that part of the article: Just imagine the level of precision neccessary to develop, manufacture, operate and record all of that. And think about the possibilites we could have if such machines couldn't just be used to scan, but instead to modify or create things on that scale. actually you can write your name in atoms already. at least our prof told us so ![]() ah damn. just realized someone else mentioned it already. | ||
Zedders
Canada450 Posts
So did they somehow overcome this hurdle? That's fucking sick but confuses me.....xplain to me physics majors plzzz | ||
Sentient
United States437 Posts
Down the road, this should lead to some pretty awesome advances in molecular modeling. Exciting times for science! | ||
chestnutman
176 Posts
On a side note, AFMs are a bitch to use. I broke that tip 3 times during my lab course and in the end I only got a picture of a giant grain of dirt. Thank god I dont have to deal with that anymore, you need so much patience. | ||
Sanq
Turkey2 Posts
On August 30 2011 04:42 Zedders wrote: okay so wait....is this like a series of photos compiled over time to create the probability of where the electron is? ie. the cloud. Cuz I thought that if you took a photograph of an electron it can't be actually done since it changes the state of energy that it would be at giving it an inaccurate photo. Heismann's principle or w/e.... So did they somehow overcome this hurdle? That's fucking sick but confuses me.....xplain to me physics majors plzzz This is actually the compiled data from the interaction of a single carbon dioxide molecule with this carbon polymer. From the interaction they determined the space where there is NO probability to find an electron therefore the parts left out (white parts) gave us the molecular orbitals. And you're correct, this is not a photo but a representation of their result from the experiment. However, as far as I know the MOs have been only justified by mathematical equations thus making this experiment so important. | ||
LambtrOn
United States671 Posts
| ||
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
5ukkub
Poland507 Posts
And to show REALLY how far the researchers have gone, here is a somewhat easy comparison: If the nucleus would be the basketball, electron would be like a needle tip. To see, how big an atom would be like that, you need to put the needle tip away for about 10 miles from the basketball! To show how fast the electron circles around the nucleus, i can't even think of a number that big to show the speed of the needle tip circling around the basketball... | ||
biomech
Germany380 Posts
go humans!! awesome stuff :D | ||
Antisocialmunky
United States5912 Posts
![]() Electrons in my mind will always now be linked to 'No Homo For L(o)mo.' Hwaseung Oz forever! | ||
Pillage
United States804 Posts
| ||
SwampZero
Greece350 Posts
| ||
enzym
Germany1034 Posts
The dangers of nano-particles are a tricky thing. They can stick to various parts of the biological machine that is you and negatively affect your functionality (make you ill or kill you). There seems to be consensus that, although one should be aware of materials containing fixed nanoparticles, the immediate concern is with free nanoparticles. Nanoparticles are very different from their everyday counterparts, so their adverse effects cannot be derived from the known toxicity of the macro-sized material. This poses significant issues for addressing the health and environmental impact of free nanoparticles. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_of_nanotechnology#Health_and_safety_impact_from_nanoparticles | ||
| ||