• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:17
CEST 00:17
KST 07:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 725 users

Could a Technocracy be Better than Democracy? - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 38 39 40 Next All
MonsieurGrimm
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada2441 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 08:32:44
August 12 2011 08:11 GMT
#21
On August 12 2011 17:09 Slaughter wrote:
The flaw isn't in the systems themselves but in people. If you had a technocracy then those in charge would simply abuse it and suppress things challenging to their viewpoints. Just like now everyone talks over each other.

the current system really, really isn't much better T_____T

like winston churchill said, democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.

it couldn't be a one-leader system though, it would have to be representatives from a bunch of different fields in a council who govern over their specific fields, but can exert some power over other fields maybe. I like the idea that people would come to positions of power through merit, but the general population needs a say. I don't know how to fit both concepts in... maybe you have a system where people vote for different fields and the votes more or less determine the budget? but that would assume that the general population know what's good for them, which they don't... but that's how democracy is supposed to work - people vote for the guy who most closely represents their ideals.

the fields would all have to be categories though. maybe the categories determine amongst themselves how to distribute their budget amongst the sub-categories and stuff, while the general population determines how to distribute the budget amongst the categories. the representatives try and get as much budget for themselves as possible with public speeches and stuff, but having a lot of charisma won't help as much I think. the guy who best details what he's going to do for the population and how the budget allows him to do it would get the votes, and failed promises won't get as many. it's not "oh the republican party failed me last time - now I'll vote democrat" it's "hey he said that we would be able to set up a colony on mars with the budget and didn't - I'm going to give it to someone else this time because those guys can't get things done"

I dunno. political theorycrafting

anyhow thought I should put an example in. say for instance one of the categories is natural sciences - there are a lot of subcategories in there. marine biology, astronomy, astrology, physics, et cetera. all of the subcategories each come up with a representative. then, all the representatives get together and decide who should represent the category (natural sciences). the representative of natural sciences then tries to persuade the public to vote for natural sciences in the upcoming budget election. some of the wealth is then distributed amongst the categories based on the votes. public services also have representatives and are voted upon for budget, but in a different vote.
"60% of the time, it works - every time" - Brian Fantana on Double Reactors All The Way // "Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people." - Eleanor Roosevelt
Thratur
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Canada917 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 08:29:55
August 12 2011 08:14 GMT
#22
I believe in a mixed system.

In Canada, we have the House of Commons and the Senate. The House of Commons is elected and they give us our prime minister and stuff like that. The Senate is another body. Every Senator is appointed by the prime minister for a long period.

When the House of Commons votes on something, it has to be approved by the Senate, and then it's good to go.

However, the Senate is made of a bunch of incompetents and it doesn't actually do anything these days. We even talk about abolishing it. Some people, most of my friends at least, are even surprised we have such a thing.

Imo, I would replace these senators by highly qualified individuals in science, as described by the OP. Nomination would be a difficult process, but I believe it could be done by either a lottery out of qualified experts who want to go for it (completely random as long as you qualify), or nomination by universities. It should be about 2 years long I'd say, to avoid corruption. Becoming a senator should give you benefits in your field, such as funds for your research. We want incentives to bring smart people. The task of this Senate would be similar as the one we have right now, vetoing the parliament, but in their respective fields, and they'll actually do their job this time.
Misanthrophic13
Profile Joined August 2011
Bahrain22 Posts
August 12 2011 08:17 GMT
#23
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEM_fields

I love how in college all of the Business majors and English majors bashed on STEM majors and called them nerds.

I agree.


I would much rather listen to Stephen Hawking's point of view of the world, than the great Obama.
The difference between satire and sarcasm is the difference between surgery and butchery. — Edward Nichols
Vore210
Profile Joined January 2011
Ireland256 Posts
August 12 2011 08:17 GMT
#24
If something like this were in place, it would have to have similar or better checks and balances in it as democracy does. I basically mean that the government can't be a hereditary dictatorship, that it can't have absolute power, and that the people can overturn it without having to resort to violence if things get bad enough.

All in all it's an interesting idea, but I think one of the best advances that we could make in our current system is to not have professional politicians and to get money out of politics.

Have people trained in managing a lot of things at once and keeping it stable. Critical thinking, training in the scientific method and backed up by the ability to call on the best minds suited to particular important state decisions. This would have to be an improvement over the current prickish, parading peacocks that we have running our countries today.

What happens too often is people are taught not to lead, but to look good leading. It's made a very shallow and corrupt political system which has screwed us over badly.

Light a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life. - Terry Pratchett
Kaitlin
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2958 Posts
August 12 2011 08:17 GMT
#25
Being highly skilled in a particular science such as a medical doctor doesn't equate to an ability in public administration of that area. There are many "experts" that don't know the first thing about anything outside the details of their specialty.
nohbrows
Profile Joined February 2011
United States653 Posts
August 12 2011 08:20 GMT
#26
On August 12 2011 17:07 MonsieurGrimm wrote:
it seems like a very, very vague concept. are representatives from certain fields elected by the people? by their peers? is there a president or just a council of representatives? how do you make sure the different fields are represented fairly? and so on and so forth. a system based on merit rather than public approval seems nice... but I absolutely think that the general population needs a say and obviously checks and balances need to be put in place.


Perhaps it doesn't exactly entail creating a totally new system of government. Perhaps a technocracy can be created within the current system. I think all it takes is the voters understanding who to vote for, and those educated in the sciences and arts getting invovled in politics. If the voters vote in politicians who are technocrats, then they have essentially established a technocracy within the current system.

I am all for a technocracy though. I think its absolutely crazy that we trust people who don't know much about the sciences and the arts to hold the power to make decisions with such far reaching consequences as to affect the very standard of life as we know it (exaggerating a bit).

Then again, the government does not really deal with science based issues on a day to day basis does it? And when it does, does it not call in experts to advise them?
Seizon Senryaku!
acker
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2958 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-12 08:30:13
August 12 2011 08:28 GMT
#27
Problems with "pure" technocracies are obvious. The most notable one being self-interest for the technocrats in question.

Pure democracies are also problematic. That's why almost none exist today.

Most democracies try to introduce technocratic principles through several steps, the most notable one being representation.
nekolux
Profile Joined November 2010
Singapore38 Posts
August 12 2011 08:31 GMT
#28
The first thing I thought of when i saw technocracy versus democracy is.
Why are they mutually exclusive? Yes you have election for your president etc that's fine. We could elect technocratic ministers from a pool of qualified individuals. Put up a few requisites ie. Health minister has to have an MD etc. And from there elect them into power.

False dichotomy. /thread
Klive5ive
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United Kingdom6056 Posts
August 12 2011 08:33 GMT
#29
WOAH WOAH WOAH holdup.

You can't bring Churchill into this without also quoting:
“It has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all the others that have been tried.”

So although you tried to suggest that he didn't believe in democracy. Actually he still thought it was the best option.
Don't hate the player - Hate the game
supdubdup
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States916 Posts
August 12 2011 08:37 GMT
#30
Each group would undermine each other for the money in their field, eventually causing Christianity to win out. Technocracy would not work.
Turn it Up
MonsieurGrimm
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada2441 Posts
August 12 2011 08:40 GMT
#31
On August 12 2011 17:37 supdubdup wrote:
Each group would undermine each other for the money in their field, eventually causing Christianity to win out. Technocracy would not work.

thats how democracy works right now dude, without the christianity bit

also a technocracy would probably be secular
"60% of the time, it works - every time" - Brian Fantana on Double Reactors All The Way // "Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people." - Eleanor Roosevelt
supdubdup
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States916 Posts
August 12 2011 08:45 GMT
#32
On August 12 2011 17:40 MonsieurGrimm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 12 2011 17:37 supdubdup wrote:
Each group would undermine each other for the money in their field, eventually causing Christianity to win out. Technocracy would not work.

thats how democracy works right now dude, without the christianity bit

also a technocracy would probably be secular

hahahahaha..would be secular. Even our government has...religious ties. And if u didn't get my point, exaclty, Technocracy is no greater than democracy.
Turn it Up
Ledcaveman
Profile Joined March 2011
100 Posts
August 12 2011 08:49 GMT
#33
I'd rather people with a clue about the world be in charge, rather than brainless politicians.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
August 12 2011 08:49 GMT
#34
On August 12 2011 17:17 Misanthrophic13 wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEM_fields

I love how in college all of the Business majors and English majors bashed on STEM majors and called them nerds.

I agree.


I would much rather listen to Stephen Hawking's point of view of the world, than the great Obama.


Just to make this clear: do you think that a physicist understands more about economics than an economist? or more about law than a jurist?
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Kh0nsu
Profile Joined June 2011
United Kingdom183 Posts
August 12 2011 08:49 GMT
#35
I'm sure if a country was going to entirely disassemble their political system and pioneer a technocracy, they would consider something as obvious as self-preservation amongst the elected representatives.

I've only wondered this for a few minutes, but the only real concern I would have would be who gets elected to represent their field? Most the greatest minds would be working for a company in some way shape or form and that brings in serious ethical dilemmas.

Imagine a company having one of their scientists involved in the "government", sounds like great advertising. Not to mention how having a guy who worked for you being in control of funding and ruling within that field could help a business.

And if you don't pick someone from a the business sector, where would you find potential candidates?


Freelances?
Current members of the government?
University academics ?

Any ideas?
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
August 12 2011 08:50 GMT
#36
We could probably transform the US Senate into a technocratic arm of the government. Require some basic things to run for office, an MD, PE, PhD, or some high level of decoration, then let the people vote on them. At worst, we'd get 100 of 1 profession in the Senate, but at least we'd know what everybody was worried about (or who was the most charismatic =P ).
UniversalMind
Profile Joined March 2011
United States326 Posts
August 12 2011 08:50 GMT
#37
Yeah I agree Infest all the terrans please

they had it coming..... (shakes fist)
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
August 12 2011 08:56 GMT
#38
I'd be automatically against this is the average person wasn't so fucking stupid.
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
August 12 2011 08:56 GMT
#39
On August 12 2011 17:49 Kh0nsu wrote:
I'm sure if a country was going to entirely disassemble their political system and pioneer a technocracy, they would consider something as obvious as self-preservation amongst the elected representatives.

I've only wondered this for a few minutes, but the only real concern I would have would be who gets elected to represent their field? Most the greatest minds would be working for a company in some way shape or form and that brings in serious ethical dilemmas.

Imagine a company having one of their scientists involved in the "government", sounds like great advertising. Not to mention how having a guy who worked for you being in control of funding and ruling within that field could help a business.

And if you don't pick someone from a the business sector, where would you find potential candidates?


Freelances?
Current members of the government?
University academics ?

Any ideas?


At least in a technocratic democracy, at worst we'd get to pick our poison. Right now, the scenario is no different that what you mentioned. Large companies pay legions of lawyers to come up with model legislation that fits their agenda, and then these groups submit them to ignorant lawmakers who have no real option other than take these documents and build off of them. People who have no experience in any of these fields have no other people to look to than those sent to them by those who can afford to send somebody. This also means they have the resources to pass along ideas that will benefit them.
Kamille
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Monaco1035 Posts
August 12 2011 09:01 GMT
#40
http://simpsons.wikia.com/wiki/They_Saved_Lisa's_Brain

Doesn't work.
Priphea
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 38 39 40 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 215
StarCraft: Brood War
ivOry 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever765
League of Legends
Dendi917
syndereN152
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1537
Stewie2K1050
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken54
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu598
Other Games
summit1g8099
FrodaN3245
tarik_tv1803
C9.Mang0208
PPMD41
ViBE10
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 56
• davetesta49
• musti20045 39
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• blackmanpl 48
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade579
Other Games
• imaqtpie1708
• Shiphtur408
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
12h 43m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
15h 43m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 11h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 15h
CSO Cup
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.