• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:08
CET 07:08
KST 15:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners10Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!42$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win10
StarCraft 2
General
Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon! TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close"
Tourneys
Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
Where's CardinalAllin/Jukado the mapmaker? BW General Discussion [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET [ASL20] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro? Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Learning my new SC2 hotkey…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1190 users

The US debt (proper debate) - Page 46

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 44 45 46 47 48 59 Next
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-30 21:25:59
July 30 2011 21:16 GMT
#901
Oh and by the way hypercube, your assessment would be correct if America was within the EU like Hungary is. Because your debt is denominated in currency that is linked to the euro *and* your central bank cant go against ECB policies a country like yours *does* have to endure a painful deflation for a prolonged period of time. But that is the price of being in the gold standard.

Compare the yield on Greek debt vs the yield on US debt. One country is paying almost 20% for debt maturing in a year and another is paying 4% on 30 year debt.

Like someone else here said, America has an employment and tax loop-hope policy problem, not a debt problem.
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
July 30 2011 21:21 GMT
#902
On July 31 2011 06:15 kwizach wrote:
Sure I can deny it's true. Investors will continue to lend money to the US, because they're making a profit by doing so. If interest rates go higher, it means they get paid even more. Everyone knows the US is not going to erase its debt/go into a long-term default.


i agree with the general spirit of your post but this part of it is just wrong. If I buy a US treasury, at face value, today with an interest payment of 4% and tomorrow the interest rate goes up to 5% my US treasury is worth less. [Think about it, who would want to pay 100 for something that pays him 4% when they can pay the same 100 and get something that pays 5% with the exact same risk profile.]

Nonetheless, foreign investors *cannot* stop buying US treasuries as long as their policies encourage massive trade surpluses against America. Like I said, all world trade has to add up to 0. And when America is - 100 and the rest of the world is +100 the only solution, if the rest of the world wants its trade surplus, is to lend America that 100 no matter what the interest rate is.

That is why interest rates in America have been falling despite a rise in both the trade and government deficit over the last 10 years. Countries with trade surpluses vs America dont think in terms of "We will invest into this and make lots of money when they pay interest!" but in terms of "We will invest into this because its the only way we can keep a massive trade surplus against America, keep employment high and avoid revolutions"
vertigo1
Profile Joined October 2010
Scotland174 Posts
July 30 2011 21:22 GMT
#903
http://usdebt.kleptocracy.us/

visualisation of the problem.
trolling is a art
mrafaeldie12
Profile Joined July 2011
Brazil537 Posts
July 30 2011 21:27 GMT
#904
Stop both wars,cut down TSA,halt defense spending,tax the rich by 91%(Einsenhower style) then wake up to realize both houses are controlled by the corporations and their lobbyists.

If you raise the debt ceilling but keep funding those wars until 2014 you will still have a broken country,and unfortunately those who'll suffer the most are the middle working class and the retired folks.
"..it all comes thumbling down thumbling down thumblin down"
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
July 30 2011 21:31 GMT
#905
On July 31 2011 06:21 Sub40APM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2011 06:15 kwizach wrote:
Sure I can deny it's true. Investors will continue to lend money to the US, because they're making a profit by doing so. If interest rates go higher, it means they get paid even more. Everyone knows the US is not going to erase its debt/go into a long-term default.


i agree with the general spirit of your post but this part of it is just wrong. If I buy a US treasury, at face value, today with an interest payment of 4% and tomorrow the interest rate goes up to 5% my US treasury is worth less. [Think about it, who would want to pay 100 for something that pays him 4% when they can pay the same 100 and get something that pays 5% with the exact same risk profile.]

You are making a profit in both cases, are you not?
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-30 21:43:31
July 30 2011 21:38 GMT
#906
On July 31 2011 06:31 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2011 06:21 Sub40APM wrote:
On July 31 2011 06:15 kwizach wrote:
Sure I can deny it's true. Investors will continue to lend money to the US, because they're making a profit by doing so. If interest rates go higher, it means they get paid even more. Everyone knows the US is not going to erase its debt/go into a long-term default.


i agree with the general spirit of your post but this part of it is just wrong. If I buy a US treasury, at face value, today with an interest payment of 4% and tomorrow the interest rate goes up to 5% my US treasury is worth less. [Think about it, who would want to pay 100 for something that pays him 4% when they can pay the same 100 and get something that pays 5% with the exact same risk profile.]

You are making a profit in both cases, are you not?

Of course. But if you believe that interest rates are going to go up you are going to less likely to invest in lower yielding debt since as soon as the interest rate goes up your bonds are automatically revalued at a loss.

My general point was that investors might be paid more on new debt they also automatically lose out on their old debt. And more broadly I've been suggesting that a lot of people buy US debt not because they think they can make a ton of money but because *they have to* because their own economic/trade policies demand it.

I wasnt disagreeing with the spirit of your post, just a technical aspect of it.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
July 30 2011 21:50 GMT
#907
On July 31 2011 06:38 Sub40APM wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2011 06:31 kwizach wrote:
On July 31 2011 06:21 Sub40APM wrote:
On July 31 2011 06:15 kwizach wrote:
Sure I can deny it's true. Investors will continue to lend money to the US, because they're making a profit by doing so. If interest rates go higher, it means they get paid even more. Everyone knows the US is not going to erase its debt/go into a long-term default.


i agree with the general spirit of your post but this part of it is just wrong. If I buy a US treasury, at face value, today with an interest payment of 4% and tomorrow the interest rate goes up to 5% my US treasury is worth less. [Think about it, who would want to pay 100 for something that pays him 4% when they can pay the same 100 and get something that pays 5% with the exact same risk profile.]

You are making a profit in both cases, are you not?

Of course. But if you believe that interest rates are going to go up you are going to less likely to invest in lower yielding debt since as soon as the interest rate goes up your bonds are automatically revalued at a loss.

My general point was that investors might be paid more on new debt they also automatically lose out on their old debt. And more broadly I've been suggesting that a lot of people buy US debt not because they think they can make a ton of money but because *they have to* because their own economic/trade policies demand it.

I wasnt disagreeing with the spirit of your post, just a technical aspect of it.

I know, and I agree with the rest of what you said, I simply don't think what I wrote was "just wrong" :p The interest rates are not likely to continuously jump by such large margins as to deter investors from lending money at any point, or at least during a significant amount of time.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Dreamscythe
Profile Joined August 2010
Finland273 Posts
July 30 2011 21:54 GMT
#908
This could be slighty off topic but here it goes anyways.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-14340470
Always forgive your enemies; nothing annoys them so much.Oscar Wilde
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
July 30 2011 21:56 GMT
#909
Well, lets hypothetically say that tomorrow China says "No more peg" and the Arab countries say "No more dollar denominated oil contracts" right? And the USD suddenly drops 50% in value. We could easily see a jump of interest rates that crushes current bond prices. So for those people who invest into bonds with *profit* as motive instead of *policy* they would be burned pretty bad.

An imperfect analog to this would be a place like Ireland or Greece. Very few people in 2006 would have predict what happened to those countries and so bought their bonds [especially German/French banks who had the same kind of relationship in funding Greek/Irish debts the way the Chinese/Oil exporters fund America's debts..] But as we can see today the interest rates those countries have to pay on their debt is higher than many developing countries.
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
July 30 2011 22:03 GMT
#910
Anyway my point in general is, when a lot of people buy US debt because their motivation isnt profit but some sort of not-free market policy the argument that we have to look treasuries as a purely economic good is stupid and cruel.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-30 22:08:23
July 30 2011 22:06 GMT
#911
On July 31 2011 06:56 Sub40APM wrote:
Well, lets hypothetically say that tomorrow China says "No more peg" and the Arab countries say "No more dollar denominated oil contracts" right? And the USD suddenly drops 50% in value. We could easily see a jump of interest rates that crushes current bond prices. So for those people who invest into bonds with *profit* as motive instead of *policy* they would be burned pretty bad.

An imperfect analog to this would be a place like Ireland or Greece. Very few people in 2006 would have predict what happened to those countries and so bought their bonds [especially German/French banks who had the same kind of relationship in funding Greek/Irish debts the way the Chinese/Oil exporters fund America's debts..] But as we can see today the interest rates those countries have to pay on their debt is higher than many developing countries.

Dude, I agree with you that one would rather lend to the US with a higher rate than not :p But in neither of the examples that you just cited did investors stop lending money because of suddenly increased interest rates, which is my point: investors are not going all to stop lending to the US if they see the interest rate go up. Maybe some will want to wait to see if the rate goes even higher, but others will still keep lending.
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
July 30 2011 22:16 GMT
#912
Yes but interest rates are a function of market demand. So if a lot less investors want to buy we can see a spike in interest rates. And there is a difference between paying 4% and 20% for both the US and the investors.
JonnyBNoHo
Profile Joined July 2011
United States6277 Posts
July 30 2011 22:17 GMT
#913
On July 31 2011 07:03 Sub40APM wrote:
Anyway my point in general is, when a lot of people buy US debt because their motivation isnt profit but some sort of not-free market policy the argument that we have to look treasuries as a purely economic good is stupid and cruel.


Correct, China's economic policy is to trade goods produced in China for US dollars and then lend those dollars back to the US consumer so they can buy more China goods.

It's like crack for the US government and the consumer - money pours in from China and we get to indulge in expensive government programs and buy stuff without the pain of first having to first earn the money. HOWEVER it's also like crack from China's perspective. How can they NOT lend to the US? What else can they do with all those US dollars?? They can't import like crazy that would kill their economy so they lend lend lend!

If China can't fix their side of the problems (they ARE trying to in their new 5-yr plan) their economy will eventually blow up just as the US economy has.
kwizach
Profile Joined June 2011
3658 Posts
July 30 2011 22:25 GMT
#914
On July 31 2011 07:16 Sub40APM wrote:
Yes but interest rates are a function of market demand. So if a lot less investors want to buy we can see a spike in interest rates. And there is a difference between paying 4% and 20% for both the US and the investors.

I know this. At this point I'm not even sure what you disagree with in my original post :p
"Oedipus ruined a great sex life by asking too many questions." -- Stephen Colbert
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
July 30 2011 22:37 GMT
#915
On July 31 2011 07:25 kwizach wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2011 07:16 Sub40APM wrote:
Yes but interest rates are a function of market demand. So if a lot less investors want to buy we can see a spike in interest rates. And there is a difference between paying 4% and 20% for both the US and the investors.

I know this. At this point I'm not even sure what you disagree with in my original post :p

Just with the part where I thought your wording implied people will keep buying treasuries with *profit* as their main motivation. We both agree that people will keep buying the treasuries.
Sub40APM
Profile Joined August 2010
6336 Posts
July 30 2011 22:39 GMT
#916
On July 31 2011 07:17 JonnyBNoHo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2011 07:03 Sub40APM wrote:
Anyway my point in general is, when a lot of people buy US debt because their motivation isnt profit but some sort of not-free market policy the argument that we have to look treasuries as a purely economic good is stupid and cruel.


Correct, China's economic policy is to trade goods produced in China for US dollars and then lend those dollars back to the US consumer so they can buy more China goods.

It's like crack for the US government and the consumer - money pours in from China and we get to indulge in expensive government programs and buy stuff without the pain of first having to first earn the money. HOWEVER it's also like crack from China's perspective. How can they NOT lend to the US? What else can they do with all those US dollars?? They can't import like crazy that would kill their economy so they lend lend lend!

If China can't fix their side of the problems (they ARE trying to in their new 5-yr plan) their economy will eventually blow up just as the US economy has.

They could fix their problems by raising domestic interest rates. letting the yuan float and allow a real bond market to form. But that would go against the interests of incredibly powerful party insiders. And the ordinary Chinese suffer because of it. When they blow up, things will be worse then they could have been.
Jayjay54
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany2296 Posts
July 30 2011 23:07 GMT
#917
dunno if thats already in here. if not, enjoy.

http://usdebt.kleptocracy.us/
Things are laid back in Unidenland. And may the road ahead be lid with dreams and tomorrows. Which are lid with dreams. Also.
vertigo1
Profile Joined October 2010
Scotland174 Posts
July 30 2011 23:16 GMT
#918
On July 31 2011 08:07 Jayjay54 wrote:
dunno if thats already in here. if not, enjoy.

http://usdebt.kleptocracy.us/


its already posted on the very page you reposted it
trolling is a art
uiCk
Profile Blog Joined December 2002
Canada1925 Posts
July 30 2011 23:44 GMT
#919
On July 31 2011 08:07 Jayjay54 wrote:
dunno if thats already in here. if not, enjoy.

http://usdebt.kleptocracy.us/

i don't really understand the purpose of visualizing how much paper is needed to print 100 trillion dollars. This is sensationalism at its best.
I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids
vertigo1
Profile Joined October 2010
Scotland174 Posts
July 31 2011 00:24 GMT
#920
personally i think some perspective is welcome
trolling is a art
Prev 1 44 45 46 47 48 59 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
23:00
PiGosaur Cup #55
Liquipedia
BSL 21
20:00
ProLeague - RO32 Group A
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs OyAji
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 655
sorry 133
NotJumperer 2
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm104
LuMiX1
League of Legends
JimRising 1052
Counter-Strike
fl0m1298
Stewie2K530
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor123
Other Games
summit1g12431
tarik_tv11206
WinterStarcraft443
ViBE107
goatrope75
kaitlyn24
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick575
Counter-Strike
PGL109
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1503
• HappyZerGling115
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3h 52m
WardiTV Korean Royale
5h 52m
LAN Event
8h 52m
ByuN vs Zoun
TBD vs TriGGeR
Clem vs TBD
IPSL
11h 52m
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
13h 52m
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
1d 2h
Wardi Open
1d 5h
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
[ Show More ]
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Classic vs Creator
Cure vs TriGGeR
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
BSL 21
6 days
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual

Upcoming

SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.