Question about twin paradox - Page 3
Forum Index > General Forum |
XxDefexX
Denmark19 Posts
| ||
Nawyria
Netherlands140 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:07 XxDefexX wrote: Cool!! Thanks a lot for the explanation. Say we were to make a glass with very small holes in it. Given the right proportions, the water would actually stay in the glass and thereby stay close to the other water molecules, instead of leaving the glass? Probably not. Part of the reason why water doesn't spill over the side of a glass is that only the water at the top of the glass goes into an gravitationally more favourable state by spilling. If you would have, say, a small hole in the middle of the glass, then any bit of water spilling out makes the water above able to take its place, so in essence spilling out puts an entire column of water above the spilling point in a gravitationally more favourable state, rather than just the bit that spilled. | ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:07 XxDefexX wrote: Cool!! Thanks a lot for the explanation. Say we were to make a glass with very small holes in it. Given the right proportions, the water would actually stay in the glass and thereby stay close to the other water molecules, instead of leaving the glass? I forget the name of the fabric, but there is a fabric that can hold water because of surface tension phenomenon. If I can remember the name of the fabric, I'll find links to it. | ||
Nawyria
Netherlands140 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:13 JinDesu wrote: I forget the name of the fabric, but there is a fabric that can hold water because of surface tension phenomenon. If I can remember the name of the fabric, I'll find links to it. Good man, I forgot the name of the phenomenon. | ||
XxDefexX
Denmark19 Posts
![]() | ||
Mafs
Canada458 Posts
I think this is what happens for what OP is asking. Just watch from 3 minutes to 4 minutes. Its a cool demonstration of time dilation. | ||
JinDesu
United States3990 Posts
On July 22 2011 03:15 XxDefexX wrote: I see, it would be nice though. Say I ragequit a 1v1 game and accidently hit my glass of coke, a little hole occurs but it doesn't spill on my computer cause of surface tension, so I can keep 1v1-ing :D. Please let me know, if you find the link ![]() I'm not quite sure that would be how it works lol.. I believe the fabric is cheesecloth, as looking on the web, lots of videos are showing how you can wrap cheesecloth on a bottle (or jar) full of water and turn it upside down, and the water remains inside. However, if enough pressure is applied, the water will still go through (of course). | ||
Sabin010
United States1892 Posts
| ||
Reborn8u
United States1761 Posts
Here is something else to wrap your mind around. It takes 8 minutes for light to travel from the sun to the earth. If you had 1 long chain or rope and it stretched from the earth to the sun. When you pulled one end it would take 8 minutes for the other end to move. | ||
MangoTango
United States3670 Posts
On July 22 2011 01:07 skunk_works wrote: how does traveling at the speed of light keep you from getting old? It doesn't. Outside observers will observe you aging very slowly. | ||
Nawyria
Netherlands140 Posts
On July 22 2011 05:06 Sabin010 wrote: The real question is what if the twins kept in contact via morse code through entagled particles? If twin A measures his entangled particle on one end, he knows the wavefunction of twin B's particle on the other hand. However, when twin B measured the particle on his end, he has no way of knowing whether the result he gets came from a wavefunction that collapsed because twin A measured the other particle. Entangled particles cannot actually transmit information. | ||
Igakusei
United States610 Posts
http://www.youtube.com/user/ozmoroid | ||
Najda
United States3765 Posts
On July 22 2011 01:02 Nawyria wrote: The Lorentz transformation in flat space-time is a continuous transformation, so the signal will not be discrete; however, the signal will be distorted due to the relativistic doppler-effect. Name the twin that stays on earth twin A and the travelling one twin B; assume further that they communicate by way of a continuous stream of light that varies mildly in wavelength around 550 nanometres (yellow). 1B) As twin B moves away from the earth at high speed, the relativistic doppler-effect redshifts the light signal, the signals he receives are in the red or infrared. He will also receive the signals at a lower pace due to the fact the light signals have to catch up to him, and thus the intensity will be much lower and the transmitted message plays very slowly. 2B) Just after twin B reverses his direction of travel (which we will assume he does instantly), all the signals he has been travelling ahead of will catch up to him in a very short amount of time. Since twin B is now travelling towards earth, the signals will be blueshifted and the signals he receives are in the blue, ultraviolet or beyond. He will now receive the signals at a much much higher pace, so the intensity will be much higher and the transmitted message plays extremely fast. 3B) After this short burst has passed and twin B is travelling back towards the earth, we are in the inverse of situation 1B. The light signals are blueshifted (as in 2B), the intensity is higher (though not as high in 2B) and the message players faster (though not as fast as in 2B). 1A) After twin A says his farewell to twin B, he will receive messages at a very slow pace, with the same redshift, intensity and message speed as in 1B. 2A) As twin B nears earth, all the messages that he has sent since turning around will reach earth in a very short fashion, much like what happens in 2B, only the intensity will be even higher. Edit: Assuming the distances are vast enough for twin A to die as twin B is travelling, it depends on the speed of twin B whether he receives words of twin A's death as he is travelling or soon after he turns around. The faster twin B travels, the less messages he will receive before turning around, thus increasing the chance he will hear of it after he turns around. What if the twin traveling in the spaceship traveled in an arc-shaped fashion that allowed him to always be equidistant from his twin so he is never going towards or away from his twin but closer to perpendicular? | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25551 Posts
On July 22 2011 05:14 Reborn8u wrote: Time is relative to the individual. The twin traveling would experience time in slow motion. So if you could talk via communication hypothetically, the twin traveling might take an hour to say one word, as it was observed by the twin here on earth. But to the twin in space time would feel normal, and when the twin on earth spoke it would probably sound like it was on fast forward. Here is something else to wrap your mind around. It takes 8 minutes for light to travel from the sun to the earth. If you had 1 long chain or rope and it stretched from the earth to the sun. When you pulled one end it would take 8 minutes for the other end to move. Instead of using light waves, you're using sound waves transferred via the E-M interactions of particles in the chain. It would take substantially longer than 8 minutes. On July 22 2011 05:06 Sabin010 wrote: The real question is what if the twins kept in contact via morse code through entagled particles? Not possible. Entangled particles don't transfer classical information, but rather, are entangled qubits, which work quite differently. In order to transfer information, one twin needs to use a 2nd qubit and produce 2 bits from his 2 qubits, then send that information via conventional means to the other twin at slower-than-light speeds. | ||
Zirith
Canada403 Posts
On July 22 2011 00:49 Jombozeus wrote: Well, your signal would take a near-infinite amount of time to reach your twin if hes traveling at near the speed of light. In other words, its probably just not going to reach him within his lifetime after 2 days if hes traveling at 99% speed of light. Just do the math. pretty much this, It has been years since I covered this topic in physics but there would just be a massive delay, depending on the speed of the phone waves. The twin in the space ship ages slower because he is moving faster, relative to our plain on existence, so for him we are all just moving slower ie he lives longer because everything he does is wayyyyy faster in comparison. I remember doing a question with some sort of particle that enters the earths atmosphere, it is moving so fast that it's normal half life of say(for example not accurate at all) is 2 seconds, since it is moving at like .8c it actually takes 5 of our seconds for it do finish 1 half life. Again the math behind this is all made up because I don't remember the formula or the numbers but that is basically how I remember it to work. Essentially what I'm trying to say is normal time from the person moving fast seems slower than their time and they age based off the the same time scale which is now slower! | ||
Quanticfograw
United States2053 Posts
| ||
Frigo
Hungary1023 Posts
On July 22 2011 01:58 Blazinghand wrote: A similar, but somewhat different effect happens with "time dilation" where if I communicate, say, through a series of pulses, each pulse and the gap between each pulse becomes shorter and shorter as my reference frame moves faster and faster. This would make the establishment of some sort of communications standard very difficult, since anything using frequency would be out the window, or extremely hard to calculate. There are self clocking signals that would make this kind of communication possible, provided you have a means to intercept shifted frequencies properly. I'm not sure about the latter tho, signal to noise ratio of time dilated signals might be pretty bad to make any kind of receiver impossible. You need to have a receiver capable of receiving very high frequencies, that's for sure. It would be certainly interesting to look into this matter. | ||
Kira__
Sweden2672 Posts
On July 22 2011 01:07 skunk_works wrote: how does traveling at the speed of light keep you from getting old? it doesnt | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25551 Posts
On July 22 2011 05:38 Frigo wrote: There are self clocking signals that would make this kind of communication possible, provided you have a means to intercept shifted frequencies properly. I'm not sure about the latter tho, signal to noise ratio of time dilated signals might be pretty bad to make any kind of receiver impossible. You need to have a receiver capable of receiving very high frequencies, that's for sure. It would be certainly interesting to look into this matter. I never said that establishing a communications standard would be impossible, just that it was "very difficult". Assuming, of course, that you can move at .99c, instead of firing lights you could just launch projectiles at .99c towards home, and which projectile you launch could be code for the message. | ||
Frigo
Hungary1023 Posts
On July 22 2011 05:43 Blazinghand wrote: I never said that establishing a communications standard would be impossible, just that it was "very difficult". Assuming, of course, that you can move at .99c, instead of firing lights you could just launch projectiles at .99c towards home, and which projectile you launch could be code for the message. Yeah, that would be the space age equivalent of dogs with CDs everyone keeps hearing in Computer Networks class :D | ||
| ||