|
On June 01 2016 04:00 Simberto wrote:
Probably. It also means that a lot of people have fucked up majorly. As far as i know professional porn is pretty rigid on health standards, which i would assume also means contraception.
Plus, when was the last time you actually saw someone ejaculate in a vagina in porn?
There's actually an entire sub-genre dedicated to it known as "creampie" 
|
On June 01 2016 03:55 JimmiC wrote:
If male pornstar impregnates and female porn star during the filming of movie is he responsible for the child?
I would assume contraception is mandatory and even that fails for some reason I doubt many porn actresses are pro-life.
|
|
|
You don't want the opinions of porn stars, you want the opinions of the lawyers of porn stars
|
On June 01 2016 03:58 farvacola wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 03:55 JimmiC wrote:
If male pornstar impregnates and female porn star during the filming of movie is he responsible for the child? That depends on the country and/or state in which the filming took place.
Can you name some countries where he wouldn't?
|
On June 01 2016 04:16 opisska wrote:Show nested quote +On June 01 2016 03:58 farvacola wrote:On June 01 2016 03:55 JimmiC wrote:
If male pornstar impregnates and female porn star during the filming of movie is he responsible for the child? That depends on the country and/or state in which the filming took place. Can you name some countries where he wouldn't?
Without knowing much about pornography law, I'd guess that California has a very complicated legal framework that touches on what exactly happens when a child is born out of a film production. On one hand, some states have very strict anti-contract policies that mandate the attachment of parental rights/liabilities to the genetic parents should a child be born, even when done through a surrogate. In other words, don't go to a state like New Jersey to do an IVF procedure with a surrogate because they'll be the one with rights in the child (probably shouldn't film porn here much either). On the other hand, states like California allow for very liberal contracting and flexibility with regards to who gets rights in a child upon birth, and given that a pretty huge majority of porn films are made there, I'd bet that there are some pretty crazy clauses in those employment contracts
As for the rest of the world, well I really don't know 
|
Could smileyfaces replace, or add to the current existing set of punctuation in a more traditional/official sense? (i.e. punctuation being accepted as valid punctuation by language scholars and mainstream media)
|
On June 03 2016 07:43 Uldridge wrote:
Could smileyfaces replace, or add to the current existing set of punctuation in a more traditional/official sense? (i.e. punctuation being accepted as valid punctuation by language scholars and mainstream media)
It could come to be accepted as a way of further indicating the sentiment behind a sentence or adding some degree, but they aren't really the same as punctuation are they?
They don't change the function or structure of a sentence, they just add some generally understood emotion or random symbol to a sentence 
|
Maybe you could use them to display sarcasm, it would be very useful in the Internet
|
On June 03 2016 21:21 ThomasjServo wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2016 07:43 Uldridge wrote:
Could smileyfaces replace, or add to the current existing set of punctuation in a more traditional/official sense? (i.e. punctuation being accepted as valid punctuation by language scholars and mainstream media) It could come to be accepted as a way of further indicating the sentiment behind a sentence or adding some degree, but they aren't really the same as punctuation are they? They don't change the function or structure of a sentence, they just add some generally understood emotion or random symbol to a sentence
The issue with emojis as opposed to punctuation is that, unlike this Oxford comma I just used, they are not strictly defined--nor could they be. could either be a happy, specifically smiling, or simply a note of positivism. Yet, apply that to a different sentence, then its the opposite, wherein you denote negativism. These aren't bad traits--and indeed the exclamation point and the question mark are sometimes used to this effect (right?!?!?!) but without the concrete foundation, it will be impossible to fully codify it as a rule set outside of a specific social group where they use emoji's to replace words or punctuation.
|
|
|
On June 03 2016 23:08 Thieving Magpie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2016 21:21 ThomasjServo wrote:On June 03 2016 07:43 Uldridge wrote:
Could smileyfaces replace, or add to the current existing set of punctuation in a more traditional/official sense? (i.e. punctuation being accepted as valid punctuation by language scholars and mainstream media) It could come to be accepted as a way of further indicating the sentiment behind a sentence or adding some degree, but they aren't really the same as punctuation are they? They don't change the function or structure of a sentence, they just add some generally understood emotion or random symbol to a sentence The issue with emojis as opposed to punctuation is that, unlike this Oxford comma I just used, they are not strictly defined--nor could they be. could either be a happy, specifically smiling, or simply a note of positivism. Yet, apply that to a different sentence, then its the opposite, wherein you denote negativism. These aren't bad traits--and indeed the exclamation point and the question mark are sometimes used to this effect (right?!?!?!) but without the concrete foundation, it will be impossible to fully codify it as a rule set outside of a specific social group where they use emoji's to replace words or punctuation.
But many punctation signs are also ambivalent ; for example a single ! at the end of a sentence can express surprise, anger, energy, positivism, and a ton of other stuff, and ... can also be used to for vastly different purposes. You'd just need to codify a limited amount of smileys which are officially recognized. That's not impossible, but by the time scholars accept that, we'll probably have invented something much more practical than written text to communicate
|
On June 04 2016 01:41 OtherWorld wrote:Show nested quote +On June 03 2016 23:08 Thieving Magpie wrote:On June 03 2016 21:21 ThomasjServo wrote:On June 03 2016 07:43 Uldridge wrote:
Could smileyfaces replace, or add to the current existing set of punctuation in a more traditional/official sense? (i.e. punctuation being accepted as valid punctuation by language scholars and mainstream media) It could come to be accepted as a way of further indicating the sentiment behind a sentence or adding some degree, but they aren't really the same as punctuation are they? They don't change the function or structure of a sentence, they just add some generally understood emotion or random symbol to a sentence The issue with emojis as opposed to punctuation is that, unlike this Oxford comma I just used, they are not strictly defined--nor could they be. could either be a happy, specifically smiling, or simply a note of positivism. Yet, apply that to a different sentence, then its the opposite, wherein you denote negativism. These aren't bad traits--and indeed the exclamation point and the question mark are sometimes used to this effect (right?!?!?!) but without the concrete foundation, it will be impossible to fully codify it as a rule set outside of a specific social group where they use emoji's to replace words or punctuation. But many punctation signs are also ambivalent ; for example a single ! at the end of a sentence can express surprise, anger, energy, positivism, and a ton of other stuff, and ... can also be used to for vastly different purposes. You'd just need to codify a limited amount of smileys which are officially recognized. That's not impossible, but by the time scholars accept that, we'll probably have invented something much more practical than written text to communicate
Sort of--but that's your reading of them, not their use. For example, when an exclamation point is used you know the sentence has finished. That's not the case with a smiley for example.
|
Well, the easy thing to know you've finished your sentence if using a smiley as punctuation is starting your next sentence with a capital letter...
|
How do you give your sympathies to the family members of someone who passed when they're a family member you barely know? I don't want to give my condolences because doesn't that imply I feel like the loss isn't mine.
|
On June 04 2016 12:20 Djzapz wrote:
How do you give your sympathies to the family members of someone who passed when they're a family member you barely know? I don't want to give my condolences because doesn't that imply I feel like the loss isn't mine.
I don't think I've seen a better answer than this.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/D9QCA.png)
|
Well I meant they're my family too, it's just I barely know them.
|
How do I get my parrot to stop cussing?
|
On June 05 2016 02:12 Epishade wrote:
How do I get my parrot to stop cussing?
Same way you get your dog to stop barking. Euthanasia.
|
Or a quick defeathering and about 20 minutes at 350 degrees Fahrenheit ought to do the trick
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
