EPTAsk and answer stupid questions here! - Page 342
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:11 whatisthisasheep wrote: Is saying offensive things worse than doing offensive things? Bill Cosby did terrible things but never said a bad words so he is treated differently from a comedian who says offensive words but never actually engaged in an offensive act. Actions speak louder than words. | ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
Not true. Michael Jackson never said bad words in his music but had a questionable private life and it was completely overlooked. Same with Jimmy Saville, Roman Polanski, etc | ||
KwarK
United States43989 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:11 whatisthisasheep wrote: Is saying offensive things worse than doing offensive things? Bill Cosby did terrible things but never said a bad word. Most comedians who say offensive words but never actually activity engage in an offensive act and are more prosecuted in the court of public opinion than Cosby was. This isn't true. Care to name a comedian who was more reviled for a tasteless joke than Cosby is for being a serial rapist? Because I don't think that's a thing. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:17 whatisthisasheep wrote: Not true. Michael Jackson never said bad words in his music but had a questionable private life and it was completely overlooked. Same with Jimmy Saville, Roman Polanski, etc Your question was, "is it worse?" In this case, i would rather any of those individuals told a dirty joke on the subject of their crimes, (alleged or otherwise), than have gotten to the point where a legal case could be brought against them for their actions. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43989 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:17 whatisthisasheep wrote: Not true. Michael Jackson never said bad words in his music but had a questionable private life and it was completely overlooked. Same with Jimmy Saville, Roman Polanski, etc Jimmy Saville committed his crimes in secret. Same with Bill Cosby. Is your point really "How come comedians who stand on a stage and say inappropriate things but don't rape anyone on stage are more hated than rapists who rape people in rooms where nobody can see and people don't know about it?". People didn't fucking know. Jesus. The people on the stage got more attention than the people in the dark room with their victim because they were on a stage. If Bill Cosby were to drug and rape someone on a stage they'd also get negative attention and if a comedian were to tell a bad joke in a dark room with an unconscious woman they'd probably not get so much negative attention. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:21 ThomasjServo wrote: Your question was, "is it worse?" In this case, i would rather any of those individuals told a dirty joke on the subject of their crimes, (alleged or otherwise), than have gotten to the point where a legal case could be brought against them for their actions. One of those people are mean to you because you used a bad word. The other one you go to jail and people are also mean to you. Unless you dodge like Polanski, but he is an exception to the rule. | ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:17 KwarK wrote: This isn't true. Care to name a comedian who was more reviled for a tasteless joke than Cosby is for being a serial rapist? Because I don't think that's a thing. Daniel tosh, George carlin, Richard Pryor, Lenny Bruce, Jim Jeffries. Mabye it's just a generational thing? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43989 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:31 whatisthisasheep wrote: Daniel tosh, George carlin, Richard Pryor, Lenny Bruce, Jim Jeffries. Mabye it's just a generational thing? And who exactly thinks that any of them is worse than a serial rapist? Care to name someone? They get thousands of people to pay money to come to their shows whereas Bill Cosby can't get anyone to pay to watch him rape an unconscious woman. | ||
|
Shiragaku
Hong Kong4308 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18291 Posts
On September 16 2015 08:03 Shiragaku wrote: I'm about to go to a pub for the first time and by myself. Any advice so I do not end up looking like an idiot? Don't sip your piña coladas (with an umbrella, obviously) with your pinky in the air. It makes you look like a snob. Also, if someone tries to strike up a conversation with you, shiv them in the stomach, they are clearly looking for a fight, and it's best to strike preemptively. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On September 16 2015 08:03 Shiragaku wrote: I'm about to go to a pub for the first time and by myself. Any advice so I do not end up looking like an idiot? Order the frilliest shot you can, establish dominance. | ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
On September 16 2015 03:34 KwarK wrote: And who exactly thinks that any of them is worse than a serial rapist? Care to name someone? They get thousands of people to pay money to come to their shows whereas Bill Cosby can't get anyone to pay to watch him rape an unconscious woman. Cosby still gets peopleto come to his shows. Cosmo Kramer cant even though he was on the most successful tv show of all time because he said a couple words a decade ago. New question. How come children who are born via c-section and raised on baby formula have more health ailments then children born via natural birth and raised on mothers milk? | ||
|
SoSexy
Italy3725 Posts
| ||
|
Ghostcom
Denmark4783 Posts
On September 16 2015 20:05 SoSexy wrote: Why on Earth does Immigration New Zealand requires an X-Ray of my chest??? To confirm that you do not have TB. It's a rather silly way of doing it though, but that would be the explanation. US health services required one of me when I worked at US hospitals despite having a negative reaction to the skin test (done in the US) AND no anti-bodies in my blood (the Danish, and most definitive, way of testing). EDIT: TB is not TotalBiscuit but Tuberculosis. On September 16 2015 12:02 whatisthisasheep wrote: Cosby still gets peopleto come to his shows. Cosmo Kramer cant even though he was on the most successful tv show of all time because he said a couple words a decade ago. New question. How come children who are born via c-section and raised on baby formula have more health ailments then children born via natural birth and raised on mothers milk? There are multiple factors coming into play here and I'm only giving you the most essential points for each: 1) Formula vs milk: Formula does not contain any antibodies meaning the child's immune system does not get any help. Further formula is deficient in minerals, vitamins, specific fats, and other areas. 2) C-section vs birth: A child going through the vaginal birth will be exposed to quite a lot of bacteria on the way - there is a theory that this helps colonize the child's digestive tract - which also helps the immune system. Furthermore, the added "stress" for the baby to go through a vaginal birth means a higher epinehprine response which, alongside the mechanical pressure being applied during the birth, helps with expelling fluid from the lungs and ensure better breathing of the newborn child. There is quite a lot more to it, but this was it in short. | ||
|
oGoZenob
France1503 Posts
On September 16 2015 20:12 Ghostcom wrote: To confirm that you do not have TB. It's a rather silly way of doing it though, but that would be the explanation. US health services required one of me when I worked at US hospitals despite having a negative reaction to the skin test (done in the US) AND no anti-bodies in my blood (the Danish, and most definitive, way of testing). Why would he have TotalBiscuit in his chest ? | ||
|
Sent.
Poland9299 Posts
| ||
|
whatisthisasheep
624 Posts
Isn't it just a intellectually sophisticated form of apartheid? | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18291 Posts
On September 16 2015 23:36 whatisthisasheep wrote: In a world where its not legal discriminate against people based upon gender, skin color, sexual preference, etc. why it is perfectly legal to discriminate against a person based upon educational attainment, a diploma someone does or doesn't have, that was or wasent received form this or that school? Isn't it just a intellectually sophisticated form of apartheid? Are you stupid? If not, please prove it by attaching an imgur of your PhD diploma from a recognized university. Elsewise I will assume you're stupid (+ Show Spoiler + to be fair, I might assume that regardless of that piece of paper | ||
| ||
