EPTOn June 05 2011 20:01 Fredoq wrote:
True, I would like to see how a feminist would react to this :D
True, I would like to see how a feminist would react to this :D
Yea, me too.
8th grade Girls Attack/Strip 11-Year-Old Boy - Page 16
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Fuckyeah
17 Posts
Yea, me too. | ||
|
SpaceFighting
New Zealand690 Posts
it is stupid though, i wouldnt even call it a prank to be honest... cruel i guess i dont think they stole his shorts right? letting him walk home butt nekkid...optimism ftw =S | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
Like most people in this thread probably. | ||
|
Elroi
Sweden5599 Posts
You cannot compare male nudity and female nudity in our society. Female nudity is a much more sensitive matter. | ||
|
jello_biafra
United Kingdom6639 Posts
Theoretically they should wholeheartedly agree with the general sentiment of it because feminism is all about women being equal to men, in practice though I suspect they'd object  | ||
|
Grummler
Germany743 Posts
| ||
|
kerpal
United Kingdom2695 Posts
this is a little absurd. there's a reason that 3 14-year-old guys stripping a girl would be treated differently... it would be TOTALLY different. not to say this isn't horrible and absurd that they'd do it, but don't say it should be treated the same, that's the kind of thing that gets people punished way out of proportion to their crimes. | ||
|
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
On June 05 2011 20:10 Elroi wrote: intelligent mother to not press charges against that young girls. It would probably destroy their lives and make them much worse. It was just a prank - albeit it went too far. You cannot compare male nudity and female nudity in our society. Female nudity is a much more sensitive matter. HAHAHHA You really think that? Let me explain to you about the juvenile justice system in this country.... It doesn't exist. The only way a juvenile gets any sort of actual punishment when it comes to things like this is if they commit a horrible felony like sexual assault or murder. Otherwise they get a tap on the wrist at most and maybe a probationary period that really isn't probation. The fine has to be paid by the parent if there is one so the children aren't really going to feel the punishment in that regard either. The mother is intelligent because she probably realizes the only way those girls will face any sort of punishment is if their parents do something about it. | ||
AcesAnoka
Belgium262 Posts
| ||
|
Piski
Finland3461 Posts
On June 05 2011 20:10 Elroi wrote: intelligent mother to not press charges against that young girls. It would probably destroy their lives and make them much worse. It was just a prank - albeit it went too far. You cannot compare male nudity and female nudity in our society. Female nudity is a much more sensitive matter. So it's ok to humiliate 11 year old boys and put those videos on the web? If the mother would press charges it would be as a misdemeanor which hardly would ruin their lives. Also we are not talking about a full grown man who is fine with his sexuality. It's a 11 year old boy who actually has a lot more school years ahead of him, which now he will probably spent constantly being reminded how he got "raped" by three girls. | ||
|
Khenra
Netherlands885 Posts
I don't know how the American legal system works, but I think doing some community service like helping out in an elderly home for a year would be a great way to make clear that the girls really did cross the line. Being grounded / being withheld allowance for a month is not going to show that. Not to the girls, not to the public. About the gender reverse issue: I would propose the exact same punishment in that case. You CANNOT infer that the boys were trying to rape the girl. Hormones / etc have nothing to do with it. You are just theorycrafting. The fact is the boys are pulling a prank and go too far, and should be punished accordingly. | ||
|
jackofclubs81
United States196 Posts
On June 05 2011 15:03 freddievercetti wrote: I looked up the /b/ threads before they 404ed. They don't have the names of the girls but they do have their addresses/phone #s and parent names already. Those /b/ guys are real creepy. Don't diss /b/... it could turn out badly for you. | ||
|
green.at
Austria1459 Posts
 | ||
|
jlim
Spain943 Posts
On June 05 2011 14:43 HazMat wrote: TL truly is the 2 day late version of Reddit. On June 05 2011 14:43 Keitzer wrote: just saw this on 4chan.... pretty em-effing scary keep bragging about reddit btw just not to get warned for being off-topic, i think they should send the girls a year long to some reformatory so that they really learn the lesson; when you're 11 years old you just don't take anything seriously unless you recieve a really harsh lesson. if they've shown such an horrible demeanour being just 11 you can only fear what they will do when hey turn 18. i take for granted that the parents of the girls could have done a better job raising and educating them, but still... i, and any sane kid, would have never done such a terrible thing. now blame me for being harsh... | ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
oh who am I kidding, 4chan is mainstream as fuck now i really wish that there would be some sort of equal rights protest from men, just because we are the dominant gender and have throughout history been in power, the compensation for that in modern society goes too far, and females should not be more equal imagine the feminists on stupid daytime talk shows though :O | ||
|
sunprince
United States2258 Posts
Probably the same way they reacted when Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband's penis: "You go, girl!" Feminists aren't exactly known for taking the side of men or boys. | ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
Probably the same way they reacted when Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband's penis: "You go, girl!" Feminists aren't exactly known for taking the side of men or boys. They are also known for not being reasonable at all. | ||
|
Nanoko
Canada45 Posts
On June 05 2011 20:10 Elroi wrote: intelligent mother to not press charges against that young girls. It would probably destroy their lives and make them much worse. It was just a prank - albeit it went too far. You cannot compare male nudity and female nudity in our society. Female nudity is a much more sensitive matter. You Sir, made my brain bleed, I hope you're proud of that.So, you're telling me that juvenile detention, which someone commented above as being not harsh at all in the States, is worse then being publicly humiliated in front of potentially your ENTIRE SCHOOL,FRIENDS,AND PROBABLY THOUSANDS OF OTHER PEOPLE VIA YOUTUBE. As for it being "Just a Prank" literally, what The Fuck. How can people see this as a prank? Do you know what a prank is? Putting a bucket of water above a doorway and having someone open it and get covered in water, or like jell-o That's a fucking prank. drawing on people's faces, with markers or toothpaste, the ol' hand in a bowl of water, shit like that is a fucking prank. Hell flooding your buddies dorm room, that's a fucking prank too. You know why those are all pranks? some of them are humiliating, most of them just make a big mess for you to clean up.. If you think it's a prank because, like most pranks do, they humiliated him well that's great, and you're right they did humiliate him and hundreds of other people humiliate others and post it on youtube as well.....oh but wait, aren't pranks supposed to be funny? not to the victim but to others and the people who "pulled it off"? I don't find assault or stripping down an 11 year old kid who couldn't even fight back very funny....Do you? Do You really think it's funny? I thought not, don't fucking call something like this a prank, childish bullshit is vastly different from the maliciousness in this "Prank" AHA I failed to address something in your post!, "You cannot compare female nudity to male nudity" Actually yes i fucking can, Males have a penis and (technically breasts although they're pretty much flat" and Females have a Vagina, and what else? Breasts...what makes female nudity more unacceptable then male nudity? women's breasts are just bigger so what? as for the vagina.....*sigh* Goddamnit. From an upright position, you can only really see MAYBE the clitoral hood and parts of the labia. as for a male...you see THE WHOOOOLE THING so technically male nudity is WORSE then female nudity.. | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On June 05 2011 20:27 sunprince wrote: Probably the same way they reacted when Lorena Bobbitt cut off her husband's penis: "You go, girl!" Feminists aren't exactly known for taking the side of men or boys. Feminists are also not a hive mind and the action of a few doesn't not represent all of them. Just like atheists or other groups where a wide range of people fall under. | ||
|
-_-Quails
Australia796 Posts
On June 05 2011 20:10 Elroi wrote: intelligent mother to not press charges against that young girls. It would probably destroy their lives and make them much worse. It was just a prank - albeit it went too far. You cannot compare male nudity and female nudity in our society. Female nudity is a much more sensitive matter. Relevant to this case: A group of older people forcibly stripped a child as they screamed for mercy. Irrelevant to this case: The genders of any involved. Child nudity is more sensitive than female nudity. Edit: I am a feminist, and that is why I utterly condemn all gender double standards. Especially where they lead to acts like this going unpunished. | ||
| ||
