• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:45
CEST 06:45
KST 13:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202561RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension5
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Server Blocker Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension Greatest Players of All Time: 2025 Update The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
[G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 612 users

48 hours to stop Uganda's anti-gay bill - Page 15

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 34 Next All
Chibithor
Profile Joined April 2011
Brazil514 Posts
May 10 2011 18:15 GMT
#281
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).

Petitions like this are about giving more rights and choices available to people, as is pro-choice. I don't understand your logic on how thinking that a mother should be able to make decisions about herself leads to you being unable to 'assert' your opinions on others. Or that how giving more rights to people is asserting opinions on/forcing anyone. Wouldn't it be: mothers should be able to make decisions about themselves -> gay people should be able to make decisions about themselves (to engage in a homosexual relationship, for example)?

In any case, I signed it and hopefully the petition will help.
trackd00r
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Chile284 Posts
May 10 2011 18:18 GMT
#282
I signed the petition.
But honestly, I don't think that a non-government organization will be able to stop this
''They put signs, but I can't read''
TALegion
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1187 Posts
May 10 2011 18:21 GMT
#283
On May 11 2011 03:15 Chibithor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).

Petitions like this are about giving more rights and choices available to people, as is pro-choice. I don't understand your logic on how thinking that a mother should be able to make decisions about herself leads to you being unable to 'assert' your opinions on others. Or that how giving more rights to people is asserting opinions on/forcing anyone. Wouldn't it be: mothers should be able to make decisions about themselves -> gay people should be able to make decisions about themselves (to engage in a homosexual relationship, for example)?

In any case, I signed it and hopefully the petition will help.

I was thinking along these lines:

Mother makes a choice about, "herself," (including the baby, as part of her, not a seperate victim).
No old, white guy sitting up in congress can tell her what to do! It'a her life!

Uganda makes a choice about themselves (the people in it, being part of the county).
Who are we to tell them to abide by our morals?
A person willing to die for a cause is a hero. A person willing to kill for a cause is a madman
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
May 10 2011 18:21 GMT
#284
On May 11 2011 03:18 trackd00r wrote:
I signed the petition.
But honestly, I don't think that a non-government organization will be able to stop this


You'd be surprised. NGOs get their pressure and effect by influencing politicians of various countries in which they have support, and through those channels they can make their effect be felt.
ZerGuy
Profile Joined June 2008
Poland204 Posts
May 10 2011 18:22 GMT
#285
As far as I know and read, they don't give death penalty for being gay. What I found said they give it for having gay sex when being ill for AIDS, or having an homo intercourse with an underaged person. Can you link me to sources claim that Uganda bill plans death penalty for being gay?
Someday ill be pro
j0k3r
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States577 Posts
May 10 2011 18:25 GMT
#286
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).


I disagree. An individual's freedom of choice must be protected. Fundamentally speaking, no majority should be able to take away a minority's ability to choose how to act or behave. There is clearly a standard of right and wrong. Objectively speaking, "right" morals, values, decisions etc. are ones that promote human advancement, reduce suffering and oppression, and maximize one's perceived happiness about the world.

Civilization cannot stand for ethical systems which are suboptimal, ones that restrict freedom of choice and cause suffering among the people who are subject to them.

I find it reprehensible to not make a stand against oppressive laws and regimes. We must actively expose logical loopholes in people's reasoning, reasoning derived from religiously fueled hatred, and undermine their actions to cause harm to others. Would you not agree?

Plainly, there are cases where it is the completely right thing to tell others what to do.
wzzit
Profile Joined February 2011
United States201 Posts
May 10 2011 18:31 GMT
#287
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).


As others have pointed out, human rights trump the democratic rights of nations. Most countries support the use of military intervention to prevent genocide. This situation is no different.
Bortlett
Profile Joined October 2010
United States302 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-05-10 18:33:05
May 10 2011 18:31 GMT
#288
On May 11 2011 03:22 ZerGuy wrote:
As far as I know and read, they don't give death penalty for being gay. What I found said they give it for having gay sex when being ill for AIDS, or having an homo intercourse with an underaged person. Can you link me to sources claim that Uganda bill plans death penalty for being gay?


The text of the bill says this, although maybe the 2011 version is different (http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2009/10/15/15609):


2. The offence of homosexuality.
(1) A person commits the offence of homosexuality if-

(a) he penetrates the anus or mouth of another person of the same sex with his penis or any other sexual contraption;

(b) he or she uses any object or sexual contraption to penetrate or stimulate sexual organ of a person of the same sex;

(e) he or she touches another person with the intention of committing the act of homosexuality.

(2) A person who commits an offence under this section shall be liable on conviction to imprisonment for life.

3. Aggravated homosexuality.
(1) A person commits the offense of aggravated homosexuality where the

(a) person against whom the offence is committed is below the age of 18 years;

(b) offender is a person living with HIV;

(c) offender is a parent or guardian of the person against whom the offence is committed;

(d) offender is a person in authority over the person against whom the offence is committed;

(e) victim of the offence is a person with disability;

(f) offender is a serial offender, or

(g) offender applies, administers or causes to be used by any man or woman any drug, matter or thing with intent to stupefy overpower him or her so as to there by enable any person to have unlawful carnal connection with any person of the same sex,

(2) A person who commits the offence of aggravated homosexuality shall be liable on conviction to suffer death.

(3) Where a person is charged with the offence under this section, that person shall undergo a medical examination to ascertain his or her HIV status.


Presumably a "serial offender" is somebody who has sex with people of the same gender multiple times, which is going to be true for any gay person with an active sex life. Even if it's just once, you're imprisoned for life, which isn't much better.
Kinetik_Inferno
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1431 Posts
May 10 2011 18:33 GMT
#289
I can't believe that they're almost getting away with this! This is utter bullshit.
fortheGG
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom1002 Posts
May 10 2011 18:36 GMT
#290
On May 11 2011 03:33 Kinetik_Inferno wrote:
I can't believe that they're almost getting away with this! This is utter bullshit.


Same here, when I initially saw this thread I had no idea you could even try pass such crazy laws without massive backlash.
Goldfish300
Profile Joined February 2011
United Kingdom40 Posts
May 10 2011 18:36 GMT
#291
On May 11 2011 03:21 TALegion wrote:
I was thinking along these lines:

Mother makes a choice about, "herself," (including the baby, as part of her, not a seperate victim).
No old, white guy sitting up in congress can tell her what to do! It'a her life!

Uganda makes a choice about themselves (the people in it, being part of the county).
Who are we to tell them to abide by our morals?

As you said. Uganda isn't a single person. Its a large group of people who are capable of different opinions. In this case, some have decided the right thing to do is to tell the others how to behave or face punishment. To me, this is the same the old white guy telling the mother what to do, which you said isn't right.
Just because they are in another country doesn't mean they can do that anymore than we can, unless you have double standards.
You are what you eat, You are what you think, You are what you do. Remember that.
Thrill
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
2599 Posts
May 10 2011 18:40 GMT
#292
What kind of weird way of holding the world hostage is this? Ridiculous.

Quite similar to a "if i don't get a million likes on facebook in 48 hours, i'll kill myself on stream" blog.
BretZ
Profile Joined May 2011
United States1510 Posts
May 10 2011 18:41 GMT
#293
I signed, maybe one day I'll live to see world-wide acceptance. Ah, just a dream that will never exist.
HULKAMANIA
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States1219 Posts
May 10 2011 18:42 GMT
#294
On May 11 2011 03:25 j0k3r wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).


I disagree. An individual's freedom of choice must be protected. Fundamentally speaking, no majority should be able to take away a minority's ability to choose how to act or behave. There is clearly a standard of right and wrong. Objectively speaking, "right" morals, values, decisions etc. are ones that promote human advancement, reduce suffering and oppression, and maximize one's perceived happiness about the world.

Civilization cannot stand for ethical systems which are suboptimal, ones that restrict freedom of choice and cause suffering among the people who are subject to them.


I find it reprehensible to not make a stand against oppressive laws and regimes. We must actively expose logical loopholes in people's reasoning, reasoning derived from religiously fueled hatred, and undermine their actions to cause harm to others. Would you not agree?

Plainly, there are cases where it is the completely right thing to tell others what to do.

Don't you think it's a little problematic to assume that one's own worldview is the one that is objectively, incontrovertibly right?

I mean I'm with you on this issue. I signed the petition, but I don't see how the values you proposed are objective in any meaningful sense.
If it were not so, I would have told you.
Empyrean
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
16986 Posts
May 10 2011 18:47 GMT
#295
On May 11 2011 03:13 EtherealDeath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2011 03:08 BillClinton wrote:
couldnt be meant more ironically, thought it was clear


It was completely unclear until I looked at your posting history, after having a few double takes ><
Should at least throw in a spoiler clarifying irony given such a polemic statement >_>


Poe's law in action.
Moderator
j0k3r
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States577 Posts
May 10 2011 18:51 GMT
#296
On May 11 2011 03:42 HULKAMANIA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2011 03:25 j0k3r wrote:
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).


I disagree. An individual's freedom of choice must be protected. Fundamentally speaking, no majority should be able to take away a minority's ability to choose how to act or behave. There is clearly a standard of right and wrong. Objectively speaking, "right" morals, values, decisions etc. are ones that promote human advancement, reduce suffering and oppression, and maximize one's perceived happiness about the world.

Civilization cannot stand for ethical systems which are suboptimal, ones that restrict freedom of choice and cause suffering among the people who are subject to them.


I find it reprehensible to not make a stand against oppressive laws and regimes. We must actively expose logical loopholes in people's reasoning, reasoning derived from religiously fueled hatred, and undermine their actions to cause harm to others. Would you not agree?

Plainly, there are cases where it is the completely right thing to tell others what to do.

Don't you think it's a little problematic to assume that one's own worldview is the one that is objectively, incontrovertibly right?

I mean I'm with you on this issue. I signed the petition, but I don't see how the values you proposed are objective in any meaningful sense.


You're right, when it comes down to my phrasing, there is subjectivity involved. I hope you get the general idea of what I'm trying to say though - that there is an optimal set of ethics and morals for society.

To be objective, moral facts must be evaluated scientifically. I think the question of "what is good" can be answered by neuroscience, psychology, and other scientific fields

This explains everything much better than I:
HULKAMANIA
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States1219 Posts
May 10 2011 19:02 GMT
#297
On May 11 2011 03:51 j0k3r wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2011 03:42 HULKAMANIA wrote:
On May 11 2011 03:25 j0k3r wrote:
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).


I disagree. An individual's freedom of choice must be protected. Fundamentally speaking, no majority should be able to take away a minority's ability to choose how to act or behave. There is clearly a standard of right and wrong. Objectively speaking, "right" morals, values, decisions etc. are ones that promote human advancement, reduce suffering and oppression, and maximize one's perceived happiness about the world.

Civilization cannot stand for ethical systems which are suboptimal, ones that restrict freedom of choice and cause suffering among the people who are subject to them.


I find it reprehensible to not make a stand against oppressive laws and regimes. We must actively expose logical loopholes in people's reasoning, reasoning derived from religiously fueled hatred, and undermine their actions to cause harm to others. Would you not agree?

Plainly, there are cases where it is the completely right thing to tell others what to do.

Don't you think it's a little problematic to assume that one's own worldview is the one that is objectively, incontrovertibly right?

I mean I'm with you on this issue. I signed the petition, but I don't see how the values you proposed are objective in any meaningful sense.


You're right, when it comes down to my phrasing, there is subjectivity involved. I hope you get the general idea of what I'm trying to say though - that there is an optimal set of ethics and morals for society.

To be objective, moral facts must be evaluated scientifically. I think the question of "what is good" can be answered by neuroscience, psychology, and other scientific fields

This explains everything much better than I:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hj9oB4zpHww&feature=player_embedded

Actually, I don't think that video explains much.

You'll notice that Mr. Harris never derives his moral values from science, he never objectively arrives at a moral statement. What he does is use science to evaluate moral claims that are already in play. He has already decided "what is good," he's just advocating using objective methods to decide just how good.

Can you explain how, for instance, neuroscience might answer the question of "what is good"? Or how one might use the scientific method to discover an optimal set of ethics and morals?
If it were not so, I would have told you.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
May 10 2011 19:07 GMT
#298
On May 11 2011 03:42 HULKAMANIA wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 11 2011 03:25 j0k3r wrote:
On May 11 2011 02:54 TALegion wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I signed the petition, but:

I just thought of something. In a debate against abortion, one of the arguments is that only a person should be allowed to make decisions about herself (in this case, I refer to the child as part of the mother, without its own rights). So, if you're pro-choice, how can you eb against this? It isn't your country. It doesn't affect you. You don't know what's best, and you shouldn't try to assert your opinions on others, more or less force them.

Like I said, I signed the petition, but I find it mildly hypocritical. I support Gay Rights (imo, they have just as much right to be happy as anyone else), but I don't like the idea of trying to force my beliefs/opinions/culture onto another group of people, when I also claim to be pro-choice (where people make independent choices for themselves).


I disagree. An individual's freedom of choice must be protected. Fundamentally speaking, no majority should be able to take away a minority's ability to choose how to act or behave. There is clearly a standard of right and wrong. Objectively speaking, "right" morals, values, decisions etc. are ones that promote human advancement, reduce suffering and oppression, and maximize one's perceived happiness about the world.

Civilization cannot stand for ethical systems which are suboptimal, ones that restrict freedom of choice and cause suffering among the people who are subject to them.


I find it reprehensible to not make a stand against oppressive laws and regimes. We must actively expose logical loopholes in people's reasoning, reasoning derived from religiously fueled hatred, and undermine their actions to cause harm to others. Would you not agree?

Plainly, there are cases where it is the completely right thing to tell others what to do.

Don't you think it's a little problematic to assume that one's own worldview is the one that is objectively, incontrovertibly right?

I mean I'm with you on this issue. I signed the petition, but I don't see how the values you proposed are objective in any meaningful sense.


For better or worse that's how human rights and the morality of Enlightenment works. The United States Declaration of Independence says: "We hold these truths to be self-evident..." not "We find the following statements have been gaining popularity in recent years in our culture."

Of course different cultures have different moral codes. It just happens that our moral code includes the rule that we should expect everyone else to follow it (at least the part about respecting basic human rights). Every moral relativist should appreciate this and let us try to force our own, superior morality on others.

And no, I don't mean this sarcastically, I do this respecting basic human rights is morally superior to ignoring them.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
gosublade
Profile Joined May 2011
632 Posts
May 10 2011 19:07 GMT
#299
Get me off this fucking planet!
Not even death can save you from me.
Brethern
Profile Joined February 2011
231 Posts
May 10 2011 19:11 GMT
#300

3. Aggravated homosexuality.
(1) A person commits the offense of aggravated homosexuality where the

(a) person against whom the offence is committed is below the age of 18 years;

(b) offender is a person living with HIV;

(c) offender is a parent or guardian of the person against whom the offence is committed;

(d) offender is a person in authority over the person against whom the offence is committed;

(e) victim of the offence is a person with disability;

(f) offender is a serial offender, or

(g) offender applies, administers or causes to be used by any man or woman any drug, matter or thing with intent to stupefy overpower him or her so as to there by enable any person to have unlawful carnal connection with any person of the same sex,

(2) A person who commits the offence of aggravated homosexuality shall be liable on conviction to suffer death.

(3) Where a person is charged with the offence under this section, that person shall undergo a medical examination to ascertain his or her HIV status.


That part of the bill I'll fully support. That covers rape, molestation, sex with people who may not be able to say no. Read ones who may be deaf unable to speak and blind.
and finally scum bags who don't tell the other person they are HIV positive.

That part of the bill should be applied to everyone straight and gay. Right now pedos get slap on the wrist sentences ten years in prison and their name on the sex offender list for ten years.

Seriously that's a joke. The only part that works is that fact that others in the neighborhood vilify that person.
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 34 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 16m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft552
Nina 234
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 4432
Sexy 50
Noble 0
League of Legends
JimRising 669
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1198
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor72
Other Games
summit1g7553
shahzam1052
ViBE217
C9.Mang0198
NotJumperer2
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1370
BasetradeTV27
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH221
• practicex 27
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota230
League of Legends
• Doublelift4432
• Lourlo1081
• Stunt386
Other Games
• Scarra990
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
5h 16m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
9h 16m
CSO Cup
11h 16m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
13h 16m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 4h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 9h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 13h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL Team Wars
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.