EPTIts more likely that the molten nuclear material burns its way through the bottom of the reactors reaching the ground water.
Still, unimaginable impact on environment
Crisis in Japan - Page 117
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Thread is about the various issues surrounding Japan in the aftermath of the recent earthquake. Don't bring the shit side of the internet to the thread, and post with the realization that this thread is very important, and very real, to your fellow members. Do not post speculative and unconfirmed news you saw on TV or anywhere else. Generally the more dramatic it sounds the less likely it's true. | ||
|
naim
41 Posts
Its more likely that the molten nuclear material burns its way through the bottom of the reactors reaching the ground water. Still, unimaginable impact on environment | ||
Rus_Brain
Russian Federation1894 Posts
On March 15 2011 00:36 arbiter_md wrote: Yes, these materials can spread the fuck out.So the risk is that "only" the radioactive material from inside the reactor could be spread? How much material could there be? Hopefully the radioactive materials from supplies have been evacuated from the area. Other qestions seems to be quite difficult for me. But, say living in Moldova means ~0% risk for you. | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On March 15 2011 00:36 arbiter_md wrote: So the risk is that "only" the radioactive material from inside the reactor could be spread? How much material could there be? Hopefully the radioactive materials from supplies have been evacuated from the area. There are several tonnes of radioactive material used in a Nuclear power plant. In Tchernobyl for example the incident released several hundret tonnes of radioactive material. Iod-131; Caesium-137; Caesium-134; Strontium-90 and the "real long term" isotopes of Plutonium, Neptunium and Curium. But as said before - we can't have a Tchernobyl even in the worst case. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
On March 15 2011 00:37 LetoAtreides82 wrote: For those who haven't seen the video of the Minami-Sanriku town being swept away yet: Jesus, thats just incredible to see such a huge wave but after you realize the loss and destruction it just did, its not that incredible anymore.  | ||
|
Rus_Brain
Russian Federation1894 Posts
DJ: Tepco: Radiation Levels Outside Fukushima Daiichi No. 1 Plant 3130 Micro Sieverts At 1237 GMT - Kyodo ------------------------------ 15:47 DJ: Tepco: Radiation Levels Outside Fukushima Daiichi No. 1 Plant Double Previous Highest Level - Kyodo ------------------------------ | ||
|
smileyyy
Germany1816 Posts
More and more people are being washed ashore. | ||
|
elscuba
Japan34 Posts
I want to know it roughly. 1day? a few hours? Anyone knows? | ||
|
Ingruz
Italy380 Posts
| ||
|
Myrdin
United Kingdom47 Posts
On March 15 2011 00:05 FLu wrote: I'm just wondering, what's the worst case scenario for this? The worst case is the fuel rods melt and form a pool at the bottom of the reactor, this would stop them being able to control the reaction in any way. If this happens then the fuel will likely melt through the bottom of the pressure vessel, releasing superheated water with it. The water at this temperature can split into hydrogen and oxygen, causing explosions. Fires fueled by the unstoppable reaction can last for days or weeks, with the smoke spreading radioactive material to the winds. This is the worst case ofcourse. There will never be any nuclear bomb sort of explosion, the fuel isn't refined to the point where it can explode, all the fuel will do is melt its way into the ground. | ||
|
AntiLegend
Germany247 Posts
![[image loading]](http://images.scribblelive.com/2011/3/14/c2b2d559-7506-49eb-8600-0a8a859a563c_500.jpg) the plant seen from above. reactor 3 looks much worse than reactor 1 imho | ||
|
Rus_Brain
Russian Federation1894 Posts
Radiation Levels Outside Fukushima Daiichi No. 1 Plant 3130 Micro Sieverts At 1237 GMT As I got here it is 3k times more o_O | ||
|
SKC
Brazil18828 Posts
On March 15 2011 01:10 Rus_Brain wrote: Btw, I cannot understand how they say the rad level is equal to X-Ray's one, when As I got here it is 3k times more o_O Units. Micro != Mili, so it should be only 3 times more. | ||
|
Kr1pos
Norway67 Posts
On March 15 2011 00:59 Myrdin wrote: The worst case is the fuel rods melt and form a pool at the bottom of the reactor, this would stop them being able to control the reaction in any way. Based on (an excerpt of) this lecture, that's not the case: On March 14 2011 15:42 Toadesstern wrote: Edit: Another explanation: If the rods melt the chain reaction stops. | ||
|
Sawamura
Malaysia7602 Posts
On March 14 2011 21:20 Klamity wrote: 4 Nights without food, water, or heat. It's really striking that a first world country like Japan which is perhaps the most equipped to deal with an earthquake in the entire world can be brought to its knees like this. I hope this if nothing else makes the rest of the world reconsider where they stand in terms of building regulations, etc. Props to Japan for dealing with it as well as they are and I can only hope the rest of the world is funneling in aide. Nothing prepared them for a tsunami that huge which took out every life supporting services such as electricity which is essential in keeping the reactors cool so stop blaming that they were not equip for earthquake more importantly tsunami wasn't one of the disasters that they were trained in combating for . | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
|
Rus_Brain
Russian Federation1894 Posts
On March 15 2011 01:13 SKC wrote: Units. Micro != Mili, so it should be only 3 times more. Okay, sorry please | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10834 Posts
The powerplant survives a 9.0 Earhtquake which sounds like WTFHOW?... And then everything gets bad because it gets flooded by a Tsunami, which you ckinda should expect at the coast? I would imagine it would break down to the Earthquake, not to the floodwave... | ||
|
Myrdin
United Kingdom47 Posts
On March 15 2011 01:14 Kr1pos wrote: Based on (an excerpt of) this lecture, that's not the case: If the rods melt the chain reaction stops. Nothing I said was false? The chain reaction stops but the reaction from the radioactive isotopes carries on, without control rods or coolant this is uncontrolable, which is what I said. My worst case scenario was pretty much exactly the same as that proffesor described  | ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On March 15 2011 01:20 Velr wrote: I am actually a little confused. The powerplant survives a 9.0 Earhtquake which sounds like WTFHOW?... And then everything gets bad because it gets flooded by a Tsunami, which you ckinda should expect at the coast? I would imagine it would break down to the Earthquake, not to the floodwave... It was save for an earthquake up to 8.25 but this one was 9. The power plant was damaged by the quake, the tsunami only made it worse. | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On March 15 2011 01:20 Velr wrote: I am actually a little confused. The powerplant survives a 9.0 Earhtquake which sounds like WTFHOW?... And then everything gets bad because it gets flooded by a Tsunami, which you ckinda should expect at the coast? I would imagine it would break down to the Earthquake, not to the floodwave... While you can build to resist an earthquake with incredible engineering, a Tsunami is not that easy to stop, not only does it have a incredible force of water, but the debree that comes with it is also quite destructive. I believe the Tsunami destroyed(or damaged) a certain cooling generator(correct me on this one) which is causing problems with the Nuclear reactors as they can not cool down right now | ||
| ||
