• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:12
CEST 19:12
KST 02:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence7Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups3WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia7Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29LiuLi Cup - September 2025 Tournaments3
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence Diplomacy, Cosmonarchy Edition BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL $1,500 Open Bracket LAN
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Borderlands 3
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1229 users

The Big Programming Thread - Page 661

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 659 660 661 662 663 1031 Next
Thread Rules
1. This is not a "do my homework for me" thread. If you have specific questions, ask, but don't post an assignment or homework problem and expect an exact solution.
2. No recruiting for your cockamamie projects (you won't replace facebook with 3 dudes you found on the internet and $20)
3. If you can't articulate why a language is bad, don't start slinging shit about it. Just remember that nothing is worse than making CSS IE6 compatible.
4. Use [code] tags to format code blocks.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
September 03 2015 11:42 GMT
#13201
I'm no good with trigonometry. Could you help me out with Haversine formula a bit?

I have this query to get locations in select radius range from target location. Could it be made simpler? It works but it looks horrible...


$query = $queryBuilder
->select('CAST((2 * ATAN2(SQRT(POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude))), SQRT(1 - POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude)))) * 6371) AS DECIMAL(65,10)) AS d')
->having($expr->lte('d', ':radius'))
->setParameter('radius', $radius)
->getQuery();
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
mca64Launcher_
Profile Joined June 2015
Poland629 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-03 11:46:50
September 03 2015 11:46 GMT
#13202
who cares how it looks. Its works! Its all you need.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
September 03 2015 13:12 GMT
#13203
Yeah, but I'm afraid of complicated maths affecting database performance when requests (and thus queries) start to ramp up.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-03 13:59:08
September 03 2015 13:58 GMT
#13204
On September 03 2015 22:12 Manit0u wrote:
Yeah, but I'm afraid of complicated maths affecting database performance when requests (and thus queries) start to ramp up.

So do it in your PHP instead of SQL. I have no idea what is going to be faster. I would, as a general principal, expect PHP to do trigonometry faster than SQL, although you never knows until you test.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-03 14:17:51
September 03 2015 14:17 GMT
#13205
I'd have to grab all rows from db (at least lat and long values for each row) and then do the calculations for each one of them. Sounds simple enough but then you have to do all the circus with having a collection, performing calculations for each element, removing elements that didn't match the criteria and returning the collection.

I need to think about it.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Cyx.
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada806 Posts
September 03 2015 14:29 GMT
#13206
On September 03 2015 22:58 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 03 2015 22:12 Manit0u wrote:
Yeah, but I'm afraid of complicated maths affecting database performance when requests (and thus queries) start to ramp up.

So do it in your PHP instead of SQL. I have no idea what is going to be faster. I would, as a general principal, expect PHP to do trigonometry faster than SQL, although you never knows until you test.

I feel like I would expect SQL to do it faster - I can't see SQL being *slow* at trig, and I feel like the overhead of selecting the ones you need in PHP would more than outweigh the cost of using SQL trig. I have literally no idea though.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
September 03 2015 14:50 GMT
#13207
I'll test performance of SQL computations versus this thing:


public function getOfficesInRadius($latitude, $longitude, $radius)
{
$geolocations = $this->findAll();

foreach ($geolocations as $key => $location) {
$distance = $this->haversineGreatCircleDistance($latitude, $longitude, $location->getLatitude(), $location->getLongitude());

if ($distance > $radius) {
unset($geolocations[$key]);
}
}

return $geolocations;
}

public function haversineGreatCircleDistance($latitudeFrom, $longitudeFrom, $latitudeTo, $longitudeTo)
{
// degrees to radians
$latitudeFrom = deg2rad($latitudeFrom);
$latitudeTo = deg2rad($latitudeTo);
$longitudeFrom = deg2rad($longitudeFrom);
$longitudeTo = deg2rad($longitudeTo);

$latitudeDelta = $latitudeTo - $latitudeFrom;
$longitudeDelta = $longitudeTo - $longitudeFrom;

$angle = 2 * asin(sqrt(pow(sin($latitudeDelta / 2), 2) + cos($latitudeFrom) * cos($latitudeTo) * pow(sin($longitudeDelta / 2), 2)));

return $angle * self::EARTH_RADIUS;
}
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-03 15:06:45
September 03 2015 14:56 GMT
#13208
On September 03 2015 23:29 Cyx. wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 03 2015 22:58 Acrofales wrote:
On September 03 2015 22:12 Manit0u wrote:
Yeah, but I'm afraid of complicated maths affecting database performance when requests (and thus queries) start to ramp up.

So do it in your PHP instead of SQL. I have no idea what is going to be faster. I would, as a general principal, expect PHP to do trigonometry faster than SQL, although you never knows until you test.

I feel like I would expect SQL to do it faster - I can't see SQL being *slow* at trig, and I feel like the overhead of selecting the ones you need in PHP would more than outweigh the cost of using SQL trig. I have literally no idea though.

Yeah, but the exerpt had no where clause, so I (mistakenly) assumed he simply wanted all distances. If there's more to the query then the only way to see speedups is to exhaustively test it.

Other than that, the only way I can think of making that faster is by declaring a MySQL procedure that does the calculation. You should then be able to set a variable to compute:
POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude))

and store it in a local variable. That way you don't have to compute it twice in the query. However, I don't know what the overhead is of doing that kinda stuff in MySQL.


EDIT: I was going to suggest using cosine law instead of haversine if your distances are large enough, but I checked, and float precision in MySQL is actually quite shockingly low. If precision is important, stick with Haversine. If precision ISN'T important, and a rough estimate is okay, then you can use pythagoras for most stuff unless you are computing distances at very high latitudes. Here's an overview of your options (and the formula for calculation): http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
September 03 2015 15:43 GMT
#13209
On September 03 2015 23:50 Manit0u wrote:
I'll test performance of SQL computations versus this thing:


public function getOfficesInRadius($latitude, $longitude, $radius)
{
$geolocations = $this->findAll();

foreach ($geolocations as $key => $location) {
$distance = $this->haversineGreatCircleDistance($latitude, $longitude, $location->getLatitude(), $location->getLongitude());

if ($distance > $radius) {
unset($geolocations[$key]);
}
}

return $geolocations;
}

public function haversineGreatCircleDistance($latitudeFrom, $longitudeFrom, $latitudeTo, $longitudeTo)
{
// degrees to radians
$latitudeFrom = deg2rad($latitudeFrom);
$latitudeTo = deg2rad($latitudeTo);
$longitudeFrom = deg2rad($longitudeFrom);
$longitudeTo = deg2rad($longitudeTo);

$latitudeDelta = $latitudeTo - $latitudeFrom;
$longitudeDelta = $longitudeTo - $longitudeFrom;

$angle = 2 * asin(sqrt(pow(sin($latitudeDelta / 2), 2) + cos($latitudeFrom) * cos($latitudeTo) * pow(sin($longitudeDelta / 2), 2)));

return $angle * self::EARTH_RADIUS;
}


By taking the arcsin rather than the arctan you run into problems with precision for small distances (somewhere around a meter according to stackexchange). If that's not an issue, carry on. If it is, use the arctan instead:


$a = pow(sin($latitudeDelta / 2), 2) + cos($latitudeFrom) * cos($latitudeTo) * pow(sin($longitudeDelta / 2), 2);
return 2 * atan2(sqrt($a), sqrt(1 - $a)) * self::EARTH_RADIUS;


Or something.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
September 03 2015 18:30 GMT
#13210
On September 03 2015 23:56 Acrofales wrote:
Yeah, but the exerpt had no where clause, so I (mistakenly) assumed he simply wanted all distances. If there's more to the query then the only way to see speedups is to exhaustively test it.


I kind of forgot to explain the query and blindly posted the DQL.

What it's supposed to do is to return all rows that match the criteria (all locations whose distance from target is equal to or less than given radius in km).

Precision isn't super important (it's used to display all shops/offices whatever within a certain radius).

I did some testing and PHP won't be good for that. Even though you can split it into chunks that are more understandable and easier to debug you run into real trouble when you're trying to parse an array containing thousands of objects.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18049 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-03 18:54:27
September 03 2015 18:53 GMT
#13211
On September 04 2015 03:30 Manit0u wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 03 2015 23:56 Acrofales wrote:
Yeah, but the exerpt had no where clause, so I (mistakenly) assumed he simply wanted all distances. If there's more to the query then the only way to see speedups is to exhaustively test it.


I kind of forgot to explain the query and blindly posted the DQL.

What it's supposed to do is to return all rows that match the criteria (all locations whose distance from target is equal to or less than given radius in km).

Precision isn't super important (it's used to display all shops/offices whatever within a certain radius).

I did some testing and PHP won't be good for that. Even though you can split it into chunks that are more understandable and easier to debug you run into real trouble when you're trying to parse an array containing thousands of objects.

Any chance you can use Google Services and just geofence it? :D

This kind of thing is better done with a dedicated GIS system than an SQL backend.

Anyway, if approximate results is enough, use pythagoras. Way simpler and faster.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
September 03 2015 20:31 GMT
#13212
On September 04 2015 03:53 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 04 2015 03:30 Manit0u wrote:
On September 03 2015 23:56 Acrofales wrote:
Yeah, but the exerpt had no where clause, so I (mistakenly) assumed he simply wanted all distances. If there's more to the query then the only way to see speedups is to exhaustively test it.


I kind of forgot to explain the query and blindly posted the DQL.

What it's supposed to do is to return all rows that match the criteria (all locations whose distance from target is equal to or less than given radius in km).

Precision isn't super important (it's used to display all shops/offices whatever within a certain radius).

I did some testing and PHP won't be good for that. Even though you can split it into chunks that are more understandable and easier to debug you run into real trouble when you're trying to parse an array containing thousands of objects.

Any chance you can use Google Services and just geofence it? :D

This kind of thing is better done with a dedicated GIS system than an SQL backend.

Anyway, if approximate results is enough, use pythagoras. Way simpler and faster.


Ehh... It's just a client who wants to add stores/whatever to the db. Put in the address, grab lat/long from google and people can then search for nearby stores on his website.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
delHospital
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Poland261 Posts
September 03 2015 21:48 GMT
#13213
On September 03 2015 20:42 Manit0u wrote:
I'm no good with trigonometry. Could you help me out with Haversine formula a bit?

I have this query to get locations in select radius range from target location. Could it be made simpler? It works but it looks horrible...

+ Show Spoiler +

$query = $queryBuilder
->select('CAST((2 * ATAN2(SQRT(POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude))), SQRT(1 - POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude)))) * 6371) AS DECIMAL(65,10)) AS d')
->having($expr->lte('d', ':radius'))
->setParameter('radius', $radius)
->getQuery();

Using a WITH clause (or something like that) to assign RADIANS($latitude) and RADIANS($longitude) to variables would probably help a bit. Also, can't you pass these variables in a safer way (that is, without string concatenation)?
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17341 Posts
September 03 2015 23:30 GMT
#13214
On September 04 2015 06:48 delHospital wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 03 2015 20:42 Manit0u wrote:
I'm no good with trigonometry. Could you help me out with Haversine formula a bit?

I have this query to get locations in select radius range from target location. Could it be made simpler? It works but it looks horrible...

+ Show Spoiler +

$query = $queryBuilder
->select('CAST((2 * ATAN2(SQRT(POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude))), SQRT(1 - POW(SIN(RADIANS(latitude - '
.$latitude
.') / 2) , 2) + POW(SIN(RADIANS(longitude - '
.$longitude
.') / 2) , 2) * COS(RADIANS('
.$latitude
.')) * COS(RADIANS(latitude)))) * 6371) AS DECIMAL(65,10)) AS d')
->having($expr->lte('d', ':radius'))
->setParameter('radius', $radius)
->getQuery();

Using a WITH clause (or something like that) to assign RADIANS($latitude) and RADIANS($longitude) to variables would probably help a bit. Also, can't you pass these variables in a safer way (that is, without string concatenation)?


Yeah, I'm going to parametrize that and probably use custom DQL functions for that anyway. The code here is what I took from an old system where they built all their queries like that (concatenate strings and send it as plain SQL). Quite a bit of work before me
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
Crying
Profile Joined February 2011
Bulgaria778 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-04 00:43:28
September 04 2015 00:43 GMT
#13215
Anyone here interested in P NP problem? What's your thought on it?
Determination~ Hard Work Surpass NATURAL GENIUS!
delHospital
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Poland261 Posts
September 04 2015 02:48 GMT
#13216
On September 04 2015 09:43 Crying wrote:
Anyone here interested in P NP problem? What's your thought on it?

There's a lot of unsolved problems in complexity theory. I wonder how many of them we're going to solve before we invent strong AI to do it for us
Nesserev
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Belgium2760 Posts
September 04 2015 02:48 GMT
#13217
--- Nuked ---
ZenithM
Profile Joined February 2011
France15952 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-04 04:16:59
September 04 2015 04:09 GMT
#13218
On September 04 2015 09:43 Crying wrote:
Anyone here interested in P NP problem? What's your thought on it?

Haha sounds like you had your first class in complexity theory, we're all excited about that at first. After a while, "P vs NP" loses a bit of its charm, unfortunately. The most likely answer is that P != NP, and there are literally hundred of other "likely" results that have been demonstrated "assuming P != NP". And people are not really researching things that assume "P = NP", let's be honest here :D.
The efforts required to research P vs NP aren't actually worth the rewards. Tentative proofs (all for the != case, of course) are always super long (big fat complicated books) and basically uncheckable. The only exciting thing that could happen in research is if someone actually has an algorithm for reduction, and that it can be checked for correctness. The "almost impossible" thing is if someone actually has a program that does that in reasonable time, then you can think about all the sci-fi/thriller/cataclysm shit you can again!

"P vs NP" being unsolvable is likely due to this classes theory being flawed in the first place. Think about it: it's not really relevant to the real world, where anything longer than cubic is already unmanageable ;D.

If you still are interested, watch the Traveling Salesman. We had a lot of fun with my friends watching that a few years back (we were all computer science graduates obviously, don't watch it with people who don't know CS at all, it's just a bad movie in that case :D).
njt7
Profile Joined August 2012
Sweden769 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-09-04 10:12:20
September 04 2015 09:57 GMT
#13219
Nvm thx, just needed to take a step back and think about it for a sec
"All the casters who flamed me ever for anything."
TMG26
Profile Joined July 2012
Portugal2017 Posts
September 04 2015 13:55 GMT
#13220
On September 04 2015 11:48 Nesserev wrote:

Also, the consequences would be massive if P-TIME = NP-TIME, especially for security.



BRING ON THE CHAOS.
Supporter of the situational Blink Dagger on Storm.
Prev 1 659 660 661 662 663 1031 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 420
Creator 177
ProTech98
UpATreeSC 55
JuggernautJason2
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4968
Bisu 2629
Flash 2490
GuemChi 1868
Shuttle 838
EffOrt 690
Mini 615
PianO 606
BeSt 412
ZerO 186
[ Show more ]
Soulkey 182
hero 147
ggaemo 123
Snow 107
Dewaltoss 92
Rush 70
Hyun 66
Backho 65
sorry 35
Movie 34
JYJ29
Aegong 24
soO 24
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Sacsri 10
Terrorterran 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
HiyA 8
Hm[arnc] 6
SilentControl 5
Noble 4
Dota 2
Gorgc7586
singsing3921
qojqva3316
Fuzer 264
XcaliburYe132
Counter-Strike
fl0m396
Stewie2K329
Other Games
ceh9608
FrodaN527
Beastyqt396
Lowko356
Hui .353
oskar111
QueenE100
Trikslyr65
FunKaTv 58
NeuroSwarm40
MindelVK27
ZerO(Twitch)17
fpsfer 1
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• IndyKCrew
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 19
• FirePhoenix6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 4070
• WagamamaTV503
• masondota2442
League of Legends
• Nemesis5816
• TFBlade682
Other Games
• Shiphtur242
• imaqtpie16
Upcoming Events
OSC
5h 48m
PiGosaur Monday
6h 48m
LiuLi Cup
17h 48m
OSC
1d 1h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
Maru vs Reynor
Cure vs TriGGeR
The PondCast
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
Zoun vs Classic
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Online Event
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.