Arizona SB1070 Anti Immigration Law - Page 8
Forum Index > General Forum |
Rev0lution
United States1805 Posts
| ||
RoosterSamurai
Japan2108 Posts
On May 12 2010 09:58 ragnasaur wrote: http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf NBA superstar Charles Barkley and others such as myself are outraged with this new law. Now officers can racially profile anyone who looks Mexican and ask them for their legality papers. I asked my mexican roommate what he would do if a cop asked him, he replied that he would tell the cop, "go fuck yourself." According to the US Census Bureau, AZ had a 6,595,778 population in 2009. In 2008 30.1% of these people were persons of Hispanic or Latino origin. Furthermore, Arizona used to be in Mexico... "In the Mexican–American War (1847), the U.S. occupied Mexico City and forced the newly founded Mexican Republic to give up its northern territories, including what later became Arizona" (wiki) Then again, countless Native American tribes were deported when we claimed America, so I gather this is standard protocol. This law has already started protests of the state of Arizona, including one by Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik who refuses to uphold the law, saying it is "unwise", "stupid", and "racist." Personally, as a non-mexican arizonan i find this law comparable to Nazi Germany's separation and purification techniques, and all together just flat out wack. Thoughts? If anyone is for this law please state your reasoning as it baffles me that a resident of this fine state would support it. You obviously never lived in Nazi Germany. They aren't being shipped off to concentration camps, they're being kicked out to Mexico. Personally, I feel this law is very needless, however, it would be unwise of your roommate to tell a cop "go f yourself" As he'll only serve to get himself arrested, whether it's the right thing for the cop to do or not. Hopefully they abolish this law, though....But don't compare it to Nazi Germany...Ever. | ||
BlackJack
United States10521 Posts
| ||
LegendaryZ
United States1583 Posts
| ||
AmstAff
Germany949 Posts
if they woulds start such a stupid law in germany i would start fighting on the streets and im serious about this. | ||
Judicator
United States7270 Posts
On May 13 2010 01:21 JinMaikeul wrote: As far as I'm concerned, the issue of illegal immigration is one the should be solved by increased border control rather than harassing people already in the country... You want to keep people out? Build a fence... that's pretty much what China did with the Great Wall and apart from full scale military invasions, it did a pretty good job. If you're not going to strengthen the borders, stop whining about people crossing them... China's Great Wall was built on slave labor, who do you think is going to build this wall? The people whining/raging about immigration? Don't be dumb about it. And the people who say don't compare it to Nazi Germany, ends justifying whatever means is a pretty Fascist concept. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
Immigration reform is really simple: close the back door and open the front door. None of this would be an issue if the federal government got on the ball. | ||
Biochemist
United States1008 Posts
I'm curious to know. | ||
LegendaryZ
United States1583 Posts
On May 13 2010 01:33 Judicator wrote: China's Great Wall was built on slave labor, who do you think is going to build this wall? The people whining/raging about immigration? Don't be dumb about it. Considering the fact that I'm pretty sure we don't use slave labor in this country, I fail to see what your point is. It would be built by the same people that construct our dams and skyscrapers... Namely, paid contracters and laborers. So what's the problem again? | ||
Krikkitone
United States1451 Posts
On May 12 2010 23:36 statix wrote: Anything that doesn't treat American citizens differently just because of their race, color, or national origin. Does that sound too demanding? You do realize the law does that, it Specifically prohibits racial profiling. The cop can only ask for proof of immigration status if they have non-racially based reasonable suspicion that the individual is an illegal immigrant. Note: this is a Federal law from the 1930s, Arizona is just making it also a state misdemeanor, thereby empowering (and mandating) that their police officers enforce it. As for a fence v. enforcement in the country... enforcement at the border is important, but that doesn't mean that if you past the border that you are beyond law enforcement. Honestly what they really need to do is significantly strengthen the penalties for hiring illegal immigrants... say $1,000 fine for hiring a day laborer who doesn't have the right to work in the country and $100,000 fine for giving them a full-time job. Then you give illegal immigrants a reward for reporting their illegal employers (10% of the fine and a free one-month work visa) Then you eliminate the reason for them to come. That way you turn the illegal employees against the illegal employers (since the illegal employment relies on them trusting each other) | ||
Thrill
2599 Posts
It's racial profiling, no matter how you look at it Then again, racial profiling occurs on a daily basis in the US, every airport profiles muslim passengers with arabic looks, so i guess it's possible this law lives. There also hasn't really been any true vindication against the internment of US citizens of Japanese decent back in the 40's. On a final, very honest note - are hispanics discriminated against today? Absolutely and the only remedy to this that i can see is a significant decrease in the number of mexicans currently living illegally in the US. I don't think your average white Joe thinks of any other ethnic minority as "lesser citizens" however hispanics ARE in many cases perceived of as such. This is because this particular minority group houses so many individuals who are in fact not citizens at all. | ||
![]()
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On May 13 2010 01:37 xDaunt wrote: The unfortunate reality is that illegal immigrants take far more out of the system than they contribute to it. Period. This isn't about racism. It's about fiscal reality. The unfortunately reality is that you can't back up this statement because it's simply not true. There's a short term loss in things like education, but there's no indication that Hispanic immigrants worsen societal ills (the opposite has largely found, actually) and they've become a necessary part of the economy. The notion that jobs are being taken away is flatly untrue because the work being done is otherwise unfilled 3D jobs, and the economies of Arizona, Texas, New Mexico and California are all better off for having large immigrant populations, and for having irregular immigrants. Do you guys go grocery shopping at all? Do you know how much inflation would be caused if all illegal immigrants were found and deported? | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 13 2010 02:50 Jibba wrote: The unfortunately reality is that you can't back up this statement because it's simply not true. There's a short term loss in things like education, but there's no indication that Hispanic immigrants worsen societal ills (the opposite has largely found, actually) and they've become a necessary part of the economy. The notion that jobs are being taken away is flatly untrue because the work being done is otherwise unfilled 3D jobs, and the economies of Arizona, Texas, New Mexico and California are all better off for having large immigrant populations, and for having irregular immigrants. Do you guys go grocery shopping at all? Do you know how much inflation would be caused if all illegal immigrants were found and deported? I'm not sure if you're serious. Think for one moment: Large illegal immigrant population + very few illegal immigrants pay taxes (for obvious reasons) + illegal immigrants use social services = FISCAL PROBLEM. Fortunately, you don't need to rely upon your logic to figure that one out. It has been well documented and studied. http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html http://www.heritage.org/Research/Testimony/The-Fiscal-Cost-of-Low-Skill-Immigrants-to-State-and-Local-Taxpayers If you had any familiarity with the business side of medicine and hospitals, you'd know that their number 1 concern, particularly in areas with large populations of illegal immigrants, is getting compensated for treating illegal immigrants! The bottom line is that illegal immigrant labor does not lower prices enough to warrant their net drain upon the economy. Besides, Americans can go do those jobs that illegals do, especially those that are desperate for work right now. | ||
hejakev
Sweden518 Posts
| ||
rageroll
United States10 Posts
On May 13 2010 01:26 AmstAff wrote: in germany we started the same way and noone said something, maybe other countrys learned from german history. if they woulds start such a stupid law in germany i would start fighting on the streets and im serious about this. ++ Also, in general I think we'd all be better off with no borders. Any law that strengthens borders or gives cops more power is bad IMO. Lots of people in arizona hate this law. First and foremost there are shit tons of latinos here legally, human rights groups that sympathize with them, business owners who don't want half of their workforce / patrons to be dragged away in chains, and really anyone who pays attention to politics at all and isn't a biggot. | ||
hacpee
United States752 Posts
On May 13 2010 02:50 Jibba wrote: The unfortunately reality is that you can't back up this statement because it's simply not true. There's a short term loss in things like education, but there's no indication that Hispanic immigrants worsen societal ills (the opposite has largely found, actually) and they've become a necessary part of the economy. The notion that jobs are being taken away is flatly untrue because the work being done is otherwise unfilled 3D jobs, and the economies of Arizona, Texas, New Mexico and California are all better off for having large immigrant populations, and for having irregular immigrants. Do you guys go grocery shopping at all? Do you know how much inflation would be caused if all illegal immigrants were found and deported? Unfilled jobs? People worked at those jobs.Teenagers took those jobs way back. Fact is that the illegals take more from the system than they give in. There would be very little inflation if the federal government abolished minimum wage. That is the reason no one is hiring American Citizens or legal immigrants. The minimum wage prevents regular law abides from competing with the illegals for the work. | ||
hacpee
United States752 Posts
On May 13 2010 03:15 rageroll wrote: ++ Also, in general I think we'd all be better off with no borders. Any law that strengthens borders or gives cops more power is bad IMO. Lots of people in arizona hate this law. First and foremost there are shit tons of latinos here legally, human rights groups that sympathize with them, business owners who don't want half of their workforce / patrons to be dragged away in chains, and really anyone who pays attention to politics at all and isn't a biggot. No borders? Are you serious? There are 3 billion people who want to come into the US. Do you want us to support all those 3 billion? Fuck no. Fact is that 60% of Americans either support or think this law is too lenient. | ||
Jayme
United States5866 Posts
On May 13 2010 03:15 rageroll wrote: ++ Also, in general I think we'd all be better off with no borders. Any law that strengthens borders or gives cops more power is bad IMO. Lots of people in arizona hate this law. First and foremost there are shit tons of latinos here legally, human rights groups that sympathize with them, business owners who don't want half of their workforce / patrons to be dragged away in chains, and really anyone who pays attention to politics at all and isn't a biggot. No borders? The hell is wrong with you? That is such an AWFUL idea I don't know where to start. | ||
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On May 13 2010 03:23 hacpee wrote: No borders? Are you serious? There are 3 billion people who want to come into the US. Do you want us to support all those 3 billion? Fuck no. Fact is that 60% of Americans either support or think this law is too lenient. Don't get too upset with the kids that haven't yet figured out that money doesn't grow on trees. =p | ||
statix
United States1760 Posts
On May 13 2010 01:54 Krikkitone wrote: You do realize the law does that, it Specifically prohibits racial profiling. The cop can only ask for proof of immigration status if they have non-racially based reasonable suspicion that the individual is an illegal immigrant. So you're saying that racial profiling doesn't exist because the law prohibits it? What is an example of non-racially based reasonable suspicion? Having an accent? | ||
| ||